DOCSLIB.ORG

Hillsborough: the Report of the Hillsborough Independent Panel

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hillsborough: the Report of the Hillsborough Independent Panel Hillsborough The Report of the Hillsborough Independent Panel September 2012 Return to an Address of the Honourable the House of Commons dated 12 September 2012 for The Report of the Hillsborough Independent Panel Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed on 12 September 2012 HC 581 London: The Stationery Office £59.00 © Hillsborough Independent Panel 2012 All intellectual property rights for this report belong to Hillsborough Independent Panel and/or third parties (which may include you or other users). Nothing in these terms grants you a right or licence to use any of the intellectual property rights owned or controlled by the Hillsborough Independent Panel without the prior written permission of the Editor-in-Chief: [email protected] Nothing in these terms grants you a right or licence to use any of the intellectual property rights owned or controlled by any other third party and you acquire no ownership of intellectual property rights or proprietary interest in any of the materials on this site. This publication is available for download at www.official-documents.gov.uk This document is also available from our website at: http://hillsborough.independent.gov.uk ISBN: 9780102980356 Printed in the UK for The Stationery Office Limited on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office ID P002501090 09/12 22947 19585 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum. Contents Foreword 1 Report summary 3 Part 1: Hillsborough: ‘what was known’ 27 Part 2: Hillsborough: ‘what is added to public understanding’ 59 Chapter 1. 1981–1989: unheeded warnings, the seeds of disaster 61 Chapter 2. The ‘moment’ of 1989 87 Chapter 3. Custom, practice, roles, responsibilities 103 Chapter 4. Emergency response and aftermath: ‘routinely requested to attend’ 131 Chapter 5. Medical evidence: the testimony of the dead 159 Chapter 6. Parallel investigations 181 Chapter 7. Civil litigation 227 Chapter 8. The Coroner’s inquiry: from the immediate aftermath to the preliminary hearings 255 Chapter 9. The generic hearing, Judicial Review and continuing controversies 271 Chapter 10. The 3.15pm cut-off 291 Chapter 11. Review and alteration of statements 315 Chapter 12. Behind the headlines: the origins, promotion and reproduction of unsubstantiated allegations 341 Part 3: The Permanent Archive for the Hillsborough Disaster 369 Appendix 1. Hillsborough Independent Panel terms of reference 377 Appendix 2. Disclosure process 381 Appendix 3. Research process and method 387 Appendix 4. Retained tissue following post mortem examination 391 Appendix 5. Freedom of information and Parliamentary debate 393 Foreword The fourth-century philosopher, Lactantius, wrote: The whole point of justice consists precisely in our providing for others through humanity what we provide for our own family through affection. The disclosed documents show that multiple factors were responsible for the deaths of the 96 victims of the Hillsborough tragedy and that the fans were not the cause of the disaster. The disclosed documents show that the bereaved families met a series of obstacles in their search for justice. The Hillsborough Independent Panel, in accepting its terms of reference from the Home Secretary, acknowledges the legitimacy of the search for justice by the bereaved families and survivors of Hillsborough through the disclosure of documents relating to the disaster and its aftermath. The Panel was asked to consult with the Hillsborough families. We decided to meet with the three established groups on the very first day that we met as a Panel. Our meetings with the groups that day were the foundation of the Panel’s work in the intervening two and a half years. In that period, we have made contact with at least one member of each of the families bereaved by Hillsborough. This includes a number of families who are not affiliated to any of the established groups. We should like to pay tribute to the individual families and to the representative groups. Their comments have informed the work of the Panel. But, more than that, the Panel has been impressed constantly by the determination of the families and survivors and by their dignity in their search for justice. This came to the fore when, in 2009, the Hillsborough Family Support Group met the Home Secretary, who then took the decision to appoint the Hillsborough Independent Panel. The Panel has overseen full public disclosure of information relating to Hillsborough. The new Hillsborough website makes this information available publicly. Most of it is now being published for the first time. The Panel was also asked to illustrate how the information disclosed adds to public understanding of the tragedy and its aftermath. The Panel does so through this Report, firstly by providing an overview of what was previously known and then by explaining, in 12 chapters, how the disclosed information changes public understanding. When the Panel began its work in February 2010, it could not and did not know whether the information it would reveal would add to public understanding and change that 1 understanding. Over the intervening months, we have discovered that the information disclosed will add significantly to public understanding. The Panel was also asked to consult with statutory agencies in securing maximum possible disclosure of the documents. The Panel is grateful for the cooperation of over 80 organisations who made available their own records, and especially to South Yorkshire Police who set an example for the process of disclosure. When over 30,000 came to Anfield for the 20th Anniversary of Hillsborough, it showed that the wound of grief was still sore because so many questions were yet unanswered. These disclosed documents address many of those questions. The Panel, which was set up deliberately and distinctly from an inquiry, produces this Report without any presumption of where it will lead. But it does so in the profound hope that greater transparency will bring to the families and to the wider public a greater understanding of the tragedy and its aftermath. For it is only with this transparency that the families and survivors, who have behaved with such dignity, can with some sense of truth and justice cherish the memory of their 96 loved ones. The Right Reverend James Jones, Bishop of Liverpool September 2012 2 Report summary Introduction On 15 April 1989 over 50,000 men, women and children travelled by train, coach and car to Hillsborough Stadium, home of Sheffield Wednesday Football Club, to watch an FA Cup Semi-Final between Liverpool and Nottingham Forest. It was a sunny, warm, spring day and one of the high points of the English football season. Hillsborough was a neutral venue, like so many stadia of its time a mix of seated areas and modified standing terraces. As the match started, amid the roar of the crowd it became apparent that in the central area of the Leppings Lane terrace, already visibly overcrowded before kick-off, Liverpool fans were in considerable distress. In fact, the small area in which the crush occurred comprised two pens. Fans had entered down a tunnel under the West Stand into the central pens 3 and 4. Each pen was segregated by lateral fences and a high, overhanging fence between the terrace and the perimeter track around the pitch. There was a small locked gate at the front of each pen. The crush became unbearable and fans collapsed underfoot. To the front of pen 3 a safety barrier broke, creating a pile of people struggling for breath. Despite CCTV cameras transmitting images of distress in the crowd to the Ground Control Room and to the Police Control Box, and the presence of officers on duty on the perimeter track, it was a while before the seriousness of what was happening was realised and rescue attempts were made. As the match was stopped and fans were pulled from the terrace through the narrow gates onto the pitch, the enormity of the tragedy became evident. Fans tore down advertising hoardings and used them to carry the dead and dying the full length of the pitch to the stadium gymnasium. Ninety-six women, men and children died as a consequence of the crush, while hundreds more were injured and thousands traumatised. In the immediate aftermath there was a rush to judgement concerning the cause of the disaster and culpability. In a climate of allegation and counter-allegation, the Government appointed Lord Justice Taylor to lead a judicial inquiry. What followed, over an 11-year period, were various different modes and levels of scrutiny, including LJ Taylor’s Interim and Final Reports, civil litigation, criminal and disciplinary investigations, the inquests into the deaths of the victims, judicial reviews, a judicial scrutiny 3 of new evidence conducted by Lord Justice Stuart-Smith, and the private prosecution of the two most senior police officers in command on the day. Despite this range of inquiry and investigation, many bereaved families and survivors considered that the true context, circumstances and aftermath of Hillsborough had not been adequately made public. They were also profoundly concerned that following unsubstantiated allegations made by senior police officers and politicians andeported r widely in the press, it had become widely assumed that Liverpool fans’ behaviour had contributed to, if not caused, the disaster. In 2009, at the 20th anniversary of the disaster, Andy Burnham, Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, announced the Government’s intention to effectively waive the 30-year rule withholding public records to enable disclosure of all documents relating to the disaster. In July 2009 the Hillsborough Family Support Group, supported by a group of Merseyside MPs, presented to the Home Secretary a case for disclosure based on increasing public awareness of the circumstances of the disaster and the appropriateness of the investigations and inquiries that followed.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 'The Truth' of the Hillsborough Disaster Is Only 23 Years Late
    blo gs.lse.ac.uk http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/archives/26897 ‘The Truth’ of the Hillsborough disaster is only 23 years late John Williams was present on the fateful day in April of 1989. He places the event within its historical and sociological context, and looks at the slow process that finally led to the truth being revealed. I have to begin by saying – rather pretentiously some might reasonably argue – that I am a ‘f an scholar’, an active Liverpool season ticket holder and a prof essional f ootball researcher. I had f ollowed my club on that FA Cup run of 1989 (Hull City away, Brentf ord at home) and was at Hillsborough on the 15 April – f ortunately saf ely in the seats. But I saw all the on- pitch distress and the bodies being laid out below the stand f rom which we watched in disbelief as events unf olded on that awf ul day. Fans carrying the injured and the dying on advertising boards: where were the ambulances? As the stadium and the chaos f inally cleared, Football Trust of f icials (I had worked on projects f or the Trust) asked me to take people f rom the f ootball organisations around the site of the tragedy to try to explain what had happened. It was a bleak terrain: twisted metal barriers and human detritus – scarves, odd shoes and pairs of spectacles Scarve s and flag s at the Hillsb o ro ug h me mo rial, Anfie ld . Cre d it: Be n Suthe rland (CC-BY) via Flickr – scattered on the Leppings Lane terraces.
    [Show full text]
  • Wimbledon FC to Milton Keynes This Summer Is a Critical Moment in London’S Football History
    Culture, Sport and Tourism Away from home Scrutiny of London’s Football Stadiums June 2003 Culture, Sport and Tourism Away from home Scrutiny of London’s Football Stadiums June 2003 copyright Greater London Authority June 2003 Published by Greater London Authority City Hall The Queen’s Walk London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk enquiries 020 7983 4100 minicom 020 7983 4458 ISBN 1 85261 496 1 Cover photograph credit EMPICS Sports Photo Agency This publication is printed on recycled paper Chair’s Foreword The move by Wimbledon FC to Milton Keynes this summer is a critical moment in London’s football history. This move prompted the London Assembly’s Culture, Sport and Tourism committee to look into the issue of redevelopment for London clubs. With Fulham and Brentford yet to secure new stadiums for their clubs and question marks remaining over Arsenal’s and Tottenham’s grounds the issue is a live one. We do not want to see more clubs leave London. During the 2002/03 season about 5 million fans watched professional football in London. In addition, hundreds of thousands of Londoners participate every year in club sponsored community projects and play football. This report seeks to ensure that this added value isn’t lost to Londoners. We did not set out to judge local situations but to tease out lessons learnt by London football clubs. Football is more than just a business: the ties that a club has with its area and the fans that live or come from there are great. We recommend that more clubs have supporters on their board and applaud the work of Supporters Direct in rejuvenating the links between clubs and their fan base.
    [Show full text]
  • Stadium Safety Management in England
    Stadium Safety Management in England Chris Whalley, Senior Manager, Stadia Safety and Security at The Football Association, comments on the transformation that has occurred in terms of stadium safety in England. In particular, he highlights how each football club now takes responsibility for the safety of all spectators entering its stadium. English Premier League matches are broadcast all over the world. In all continents, those fans with an interest in developments off the pitch as well as on it will have noticed the splendid all-seated stadia, the lack of pitch perimeter and segregation fences and, generally, a positive atmosphere among supporters inside the stadia. But it hasn’t always been like this. Just three decades ago, English football was still blighted by the problems of supporter violence, old stadia and what we can now recognise as a lack of any safety management culture within the stadia. Two major stadium disasters in the 1980’s and a Government-led review of stadium safety brought about a programme of change which has seen the gradual transformation of English stadia and the introduction of a new system of stadium safety management. Before examining these changes in more detail, it is helpful to look at some of the problems that led to the occurrence of these major stadium disasters. Throughout the 1970’s and 1980’s, fighting between rival supporter groups was commonplace in English football stadia. From the early beginnings of football up to the late 1960’s there had been no separation of supporters in English football stadia – home and away supporters could enter any part of the stadium and generally they would stand side by side to watch the match.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Bulleting 7: Stadia, Football Academies and Centres of Excellence
    Planning Bulletin Issue Seven March 2000 Stadia, Football Academies and Centres of Excellence Introduction The planning implications of training facilities, football academies and centres of excellence will also be This bulletin focuses on sports stadia – sporting facilities examined. New training and youth development facilities that enjoyed a boom in the 1990s both in the UK and are being planned and built by many leading football worldwide. The Millennium Stadium in Cardiff which clubs, often in green belt and countryside areas. The hosted the Rugby World Cup final in November 1999, the planning issues raised by such facilities are complex and National Stadium in Sydney which will host the Olympic will be examined by reference to two case studies. Games later this year and the new Wembley Stadium have all featured heavily in the news over the past few Stadia months. On a smaller scale, many football clubs and rugby clubs play in new stadia often located away from Sports stadia are familiar landmarks to all sports their traditional heartlands, or in stadia that have seen spectators, both the armchair and the more active major expansion and adaptation. These changes have varieties. A major stadium will often be the most happened partly to accommodate the requirements of recognisable feature of many British towns and cities, the Taylor Report on the Hillsborough Stadium disaster and of cities around the world. Indeed, it is likely that and partly as a reflection of professional sport’s more people are able to identify the Old Trafford football move ‘upmarket’. ground as a Manchester landmark than the city’s cathedral or town hall.
    [Show full text]
  • (Public Pack)Agenda Document for Planning and Highways Committee
    Public Document Pack Planning and Highways Committee Tuesday 25 August 2020 at 2.00 pm To be held as a virtual meeting The Press and Public are Welcome to Attend Membership Councillors Peter Rippon (Chair), Jack Clarkson, Tony Damms, Roger Davison, Jayne Dunn, Peter Garbutt, Dianne Hurst, Alan Law, Bob McCann, Zahira Naz, Peter Price, Chris Rosling-Josephs and Andrew Sangar Substitute Members In accordance with the Constitution, Substitute Members may be provided for the above Committee Members as and when required. PUBLIC ACCESS TO THE MEETING The Planning and Highways Committee is responsible for planning applications, Tree Preservation Orders, enforcement action and some highway, footpath, road safety and traffic management issues. A copy of the agenda and reports is available on the Council’s website at www.sheffield.gov.uk. You may not be allowed to see some reports because they contain confidential information. These items are usually marked * on the agenda. Recording is allowed at Planning and Highways Committee meetings under the direction of the Chair of the meeting. Please see the website or contact Democratic Services for details of the Council’s protocol on audio/visual recording and photography at council meetings. Planning and Highways Committee meetings are normally open to the public but sometimes the Committee may have to discuss an item in private. If this happens, you will be asked to leave. Any private items are normally left until last. Further information on this or any of the agenda items can be obtained by speaking to Abby Brownsword on 0114 273 5033 or by email to [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Hillsborough - the Truth Pdf, Epub, Ebook
    HILLSBOROUGH - THE TRUTH PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Phil Scraton | 496 pages | 16 Jun 2016 | Mainstream Publishing | 9781910948019 | English | Edinburgh, United Kingdom Hillsborough - The Truth PDF Book Taylor concluded his criticism of South Yorkshire Police by describing senior officers in command as "defensive and evasive witnesses" who refused to accept any responsibility for error: "In all some 65 police officers gave oral evidence at the Inquiry. At one point it was so bad that I developed a stock response. Cancel Delete comment. The Spectator. It has since fuelled persistent and unsustainable assertions about drunken fan behaviour". Retrieved 12 March The Stationery Office, London. One supporter wrote to the Football Association and Minister for Sport complaining, "The whole area was packed solid to the point where it was impossible to move and where I, and others around me, felt considerable concern for personal safety". Retrieved 30 April On 11 April , Liverpool fans sang "You'll Never Walk Alone" as a tribute to the upcoming anniversary of the disaster before the home game against Blackburn Rovers which ended in Liverpool winning 4—0 and was followed by former Liverpool player, Stephen Warnock presenting a memorial wreath to the Kop showing the figure 96 in red flowers. Was hooked on the extent to which the authorities buried the truth. Mackrell pleaded not guilty to the two charges against him. The extreme reaction to Mr Bigley's murder is fed by the fact that he was a Liverpudlian. Leeds United have arguably experienced the most dramatic upheaval in fortunes of any club in A book that should be read by everybody who seeks the truth from its society A disturbing account of what can happen when society's trusted institutions decide to distort the facts and lie to save their own skins regardless of the hurt they will cause the bereaved.
    [Show full text]
  • Hillsborough Hall & Hillsborough Park
    HILLSBOROUGH HALL & HILLSBOROUGH PARK The Steades Thomas Steade was the builder of Hillsborough Hall. He was the son of Nicholas Steade and Anne Micklethwaite and was born on 16 March 1728 at Ecclesfield. He married Millicent (Meliscent) Pegge, who was the daughter of Strelley Pegge of Beauchief and Mary Broughton from Lowdham, on 30 April 1768. He was a magistrate and he died in 1793. Hillsborough House was built in 1779 as a dwelling for Thomas and his wife Meliscent who had been living in nearby Burrowlee House, which is situated just 250 metres to the east. The Steades were a family of local of landowners whose history went back to the 14th century. At the time of construction the house stood in rural countryside well outside the Sheffield boundary. Steade named his new residence in honour of Wills Hill who at the time was known as the Earl of Hillsborough (later Lord Downside of Hillsborough, County Down), an eminent politician of the period and a patron of the Steades. Steade acquired more land and the grounds eventually had an area of 103 acres (0.42 km2). They were much more extensive than the present Hillsborough Park, stretching north to the current junction of Leppings Lane and Penistone Road and included the site on which Hillsborough Stadium now stands. It extended further south encompassing the site now occupied by the Hillsborough arena. The grounds had areas given over to agriculture but there was also extensive parkland featuring a lake, two lodges and a tree lined avenue. There was also a walled garden, which still exists today, which provided fresh produce for the house’s kitchens.
    [Show full text]
  • Pound for Peace
    LLoookok outout fforor ourour 'P'Poundound fforor PPeaceace'e' AAppppealeal 1st edition 2007 “The quality of delivery is exceptional”. Louise Solden – Extended School Co-ordinator – South Leeds High School The highlight of 2006 for me was the major effort that we put into taking our name, work and profile into areas of the UK we had not previously targeted. This represents the start of the outreach of our profile, so pivotal to our continued growth and development. The activities of which I am speaking falls into two broad categories: 1. Operational: A pioneering piece of work of great significance was introduced into a Leeds high school which was and still is encountering serious inter faith / inter race conflict. The project content was developed by Kelly Simcock after she conducted a comprehensive attitude audit amongst pupils and staff. The results strongly corroborated the belief that relations were exceptionally difficult and, left unchecked, would inevitably lead to even greater levels of violent conflict. Three discrete Welcome to the 1st Edition programmes involving 72 young people are being run over the period up to Quarter 2007 of ‘Peace Talks’ from the 1, 2007 and we expect results to verify that interventions of this type are very Tim Parry Johnathan Ball Trust. effective and worthwhile. This is a bumper edition of our 2. Marketing / Public Relations: newsletter, bringing you news and The Trust, through Wendy, Pat Taylor, Clare White and I, were privileged to be given updates about our work. You’ll see the opportunity to hold a hosted dinner at the offices of Clifford Chance in Canary that the Trust has expanded both its Wharf, London.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents & Contacts
    Contents & Contacts Contents Chairman’s Notes Nostell MW Recent Results & Match Reports NCEL Division One—Table & Today’s Games The Non-League Paper Article by Matt Badcock Proud History /Bright Future Todays Visitors— Hallam FC Club History Nostell MW Season’s Stats & Facts Getting to know with Nathan Hawkhead On this day—15th February Past Results—Hallam FC Meet the Ref— Liam Smith Nostell MW Squad & Sponsors 2019/20 Today’s Squads Contacts Chairman: Kevin Allsop – 07803 546888 Club Secretary: Granville Marshall – 01924 864462 Matchday Sec: Ralph Wainwright -07974 646640 Twitter - @nostellmwfc Facebook – Nostell Miners Welfare FC E-Mail – [email protected] Chairman’s Notes I’dNoes like to ….extend a warm welcome to everyone for today’s NCEL Division One fixture against Hallam FC here at the Welfare Ground. It’s always proved difficult to find positive results against todays opponents, the last of which was in this fixture last season when I took temporary charge in the touch- line absences of Simon & Jason the win coming after an early goal wrestled the ini- tiative and saw us weather a second-half storm to run out 1 nil winners. Hallam’s current form looks very positive with just one defeat in their last seven games in what apparently was a feisty affair at home to a resurgent Rossington Main side. I understand Hallam ended the game with just eight players on the pitch after a sending-off and two sin-bins. Let’s hope todays clash isn’t quite so feisty. Last Saturday’s result against a “dogged” Dronfield Town was particularly disap- pointing given how we dominated play for virtually the whole of the ninety minutes, missed chances cost us badly.
    [Show full text]
  • Holders of Ministerial Office in the Conservative Governments 1979-1997
    Holders of Ministerial Office in the Conservative Governments 1979-1997 Parliamentary Information List Standard Note: SN/PC/04657 Last updated: 11 March 2008 Author: Department of Information Services All efforts have been made to ensure the accuracy of this data. Nevertheless the complexity of Ministerial appointments, changes in the machinery of government and the very large number of Ministerial changes between 1979 and 1997 mean that there may be some omissions from this list. Where an individual was a Minister at the time of the May 1997 general election the end of his/her term of office has been given as 2 May. Finally, where possible the exact dates of service have been given although when this information was unavailable only the month is given. The Parliamentary Information List series covers various topics relating to Parliament; they include Bills, Committees, Constitution, Debates, Divisions, The House of Commons, Parliament and procedure. Also available: Research papers – impartial briefings on major bills and other topics of public and parliamentary concern, available as printed documents and on the Intranet and Internet. Standard notes – a selection of less formal briefings, often produced in response to frequently asked questions, are accessible via the Internet. Guides to Parliament – The House of Commons Information Office answers enquiries on the work, history and membership of the House of Commons. It also produces a range of publications about the House which are available for free in hard copy on request Education web site – a web site for children and schools with information and activities about Parliament. Any comments or corrections to the lists would be gratefully received and should be sent to: Parliamentary Information Lists Editor, Parliament & Constitution Centre, House of Commons, London SW1A OAA.
    [Show full text]
  • The Premier League and Tile New Consumption. Of
    THE PREMIER LEAGUE AND TILE NEW CONSUMPTION. OF FOOTBALL ANTHONY KING PhD THESIS UNIVERSITY OF SALFORD INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL RESEARCH 1995 Abstract: This thesis is a historical and critical examination of the development of the Premier League and the new consumption of football, which attempts to link these developments with wider post-Fordist transformations. The thesis argues that the transformation of labour relations in football set the Football League on a course of organic political economic development which privileged the big city clubs. During the 1980s, these clubs became conscious of this divide and, in a complex series of negotiations, effected a breakaway from the League to form the Premier League. It is argued that the latter organisation was the institutional framework in which the new consumption of football was possible. The particular form of that new consumption of football was determined by certain discursive interventions from 1985, which prescribed a particular course of reform for football. The thesis argues that these discourses were intimately related to wider post-Fordist developments and were privileged both because of those (post- Fordist) developments and the organic transformation of football itself. The thesis goes on to suggest that the conjunctural discourses of reform were implemented by a fraction of the capitalist class, the new business class and Part N, involves an extensive examination of this class fraction's participation in the game and the fans' resistance and compliance to this project. By examining both the long-term, organic developments and the more immediate conjunctural moments of the 1980s, the thesis attempts to provide a holistic account of recent developments in football, which it is hoped will throw light on Britain's post-Fordist transformation.
    [Show full text]
  • NEC Annual Report 2019
    Labour Party | Annual Report 2019 LABOUR PARTY ANNUAL REPORT 2019 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION Treasurers’ Responsibilities . 54 Foreword from Jeremy Corbyn . 5 Independent Auditor’s Report Introduction from Tom Watson . 7 to the members of the Labour Party . 55 Introduction from the General Secretary . 9 Consolidated income and expenditure account 2018/2019 National Executive Committee . 10 for the year ended 31 December 2018 . 57 NEC Committees . 12 Statements of comprehensive income Obituaries . 13 and changes in equity for the year ended NEC aims and objectives for 2019 . 14 31 December 2018 . 58 Consolidated balance sheet BY-ELECTIONS . 15 at 31 December 2018 . 59 Peterborough . 16 Consolidated cash flow statement for the year Newport West . 17 ended 31 December 2018 . 60 ELECTIONS 2019 . 19 Notes to Financial Statements . 61 Analysis . 20 APPENDICES . 75 Local Government Report . 23 Members of Shadow Cabinet LOOKING AHEAD: 2020 ELECTIONS . 25 and Opposition Frontbench . 76 The year ahead in Scotland . 26 Parliamentary Labour Party . 80 The year ahead in Wales . 27 Members of the Scottish Parliament. 87 NEC PRIORITIES FOR 2019 . 29 Members of the Welsh Assembly . 88 Members and Supporters Members of the European Parliament . 89 Renewing our party and building an active Directly Elected Mayors . 90 membership and supporters network . 30 Members of the London Assembly . 91 Equalities . 31 Leaders of Labour Groups . 92 Labour Peers . 100 NEC PRIORITIES FOR 2019 . 35 Labour Police and Crime Commissioners . 103 National Policy Forum Parliamentary Candidates endorsed NPF Report . 36 by the NEC at time of publication . 104 NEC PRIORITIES FOR 2019 . 39 NEC Disputes . 107 International NCC Cases .
    [Show full text]