102894 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

102894 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized 102894 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Attracting Capital for Railway Development in China Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Acknowledgements: This report was prepared by a team from the World Bank, led by Martha Lawrence and co led by Gerald Ollivier, in collaboration with Beijing Jiaotong University. Team members include Mengke Chen, Xiaoming He, Joanna Moody, Dominic Patella, Jipeng Qi, Siddhartha Raja, Wenting Wei, Lei Wu and Qiusheng Zhang. The team would like to thank the following people for reviewing and commenting on the report: Daniel Alberto Benitez, Peter Bishop, Jordan Cartier, Vickram Cutaree, Andrei Evdokimov, Patrick B. Loftus, Dongbin Lu, Jin Murakami, Milena Pacia, Shuanguang Qi, Rajendra Singh, Serge Salat, Jukka-Pekka Strand, Hiroaki Suzuki, and John Winner. All errors are the responsibility of the authors. The team is grateful to Yuxiang Gao, Michel Kerf, Run Li, Yujie Wang, Dan Zhao for their guidance and support in preparing this report. Pictures on the cover were provided by Gerald Ollivier. The team would also like to acknowledge the excellent discussions with Staff from China Railway Corporation that deepened the analysis and informed the report. Any findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the World Bank. Neither the World Bank nor the author guarantee the accuracy of any data or other information contained in this document and accept no responsibility whatsoever for any consequence of their use. All rights reserved Rights and Permissions The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. ©2015 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW Washington DC 20433 Telephone: (202) 473-1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org E-mail: [email protected] Table of Contents Overview Chapter 1: Attracting Capital for Railway Development ………………………………………………………................................................................……1 Martha Lawrence and Gerald Ollivier Portfolio Management Cases Chapter 2: Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad-Berkshire Hathaway…………………………………………………………………………….……………………7 Martha Lawrence Chapter 3: China Cereals, Oils and Foodstuffs Corporation…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..17 Jipeng Qi and Xiaoming He Chapter 4: Union Pacific—Focusing on the Core Railway Business………………………………………………………………………………………….…………….31 Dominic Patella Financial Leasing Cases Chapter 5: Russia: Private Investment in Rail Rolling Stock……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………45 Martha Lawrence Chapter 6: TTX Company—Rail Wagon Pooling ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………57 Martha Lawrence Equity Floatation Cases Chapter 7: PKP Cargo: Successful Restructuring & IPO………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….65 Martha Lawrence and Joanna Moody Chapter 8: IPO/Refinancing of Jinxi Axle………………………………………………….……………………………………………………………………….……………………75 Xiaoming He and Qiusheng Zhang PPP Cases Chapter 9: France HSR Public-Private Partnership……………………………………………………………………………………………….………..………………………87 Mengke Chen and Martha Lawrence Chapter 10: PPP for Primary Land Development in Shantou City…………………………………………………………………………………….…………………….99 Xiaoming He and Qiusheng Zhang Leveraging Real Estate and Land Asset Cases Chapter 11: Tokyu Corporation and Futakotamagawa Station Redevelopment Project………………………………………………………………………111 Gerald Ollivier and Wenting Wei Chapter 12: London King’s Cross Regeneration Program…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….123 Gerald Ollivier and Wenting Wei Chapter 13: Hong Kong Rail Plus Property Program…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….139 Gerald Ollivier and Wenting Wei Chapter 14: Suning REIT…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….………………..151 Xiaoming He and Qiusheng Zhang Chapter 15: RailTel Corporation of India Ltd. ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..161 Siddhartha Raja Chapter 16: Southern Pacific Leveraging Telecom Assets……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………169 Siddhartha Raja CRC is seeking to attract investment from Nonetheless some common principles for both the private sector and from public capital budgeting and portfolio management Attracting Capital for sources such as local governments and state are evident. owned enterprises. It refers to these sources Railway Development of capital as “Social Capital.” • Align the portfolio to the strategy. In many of the cases, the company Introduction This report examines how companies in acquired or developed subsidiaries that China and railways in seven other supported its strategy and divested China Railways Corporation (CRC) is countries—China, France, India, Japan, companies that did not. For example, in considering new ways to attract capital to Poland, Russia, United Kingdom, United the Union Pacific case, the strategy was support the strategic development of the States—have attracted capital and made to extend the geographic reach of the railway sector. Currently, government is the capital budgeting decisions to support their Union Pacific (UP) railway to remain RAILWAY DEVELOPMENT RAILWAY predominant equity financier, with debt strategic development. competitive with other USA railways that being supplied by domestic bank credits and had expanded geographically. In pursuit limited amounts borrowed from Portfolio Management of this strategy, UP divested non-railway International Financial Institutions such as properties (including natural resources, CAPITAL FOR CAPITAL the World Bank and Asian Development CRC’s structure includes eighteen local solid waste and trucking businesses) and Bank. Considering its high level of railway bureaus (within which are some used the funds generated to acquire accumulated debt and liabilities (RMB 3.7 1500 non-transport entities), six subsidiary railways that extended UP’s line and 1 trillion on an asset base of 5.7 trillion), CRC companies, and interests in numerous High provided access to key markets such as ATTRACTING wishes to explore equity investment Speed Railway (HSR) joint ventures. CRC is : Chicago. 1 mechanisms, to increase cash flow from its considering how it should organize and core and non-core activities, and to use manage these entities to maximize their In the COFCO case, COFCO realized that different financing channels as a way to value and generation of cash flow to CRC. to compete effectively with integrated CHAPTER leverage the value of its assets and introduce The cases in the following chapters international competitors, it needed to market-based business models to the sector. represent a broad range of situations. control its full value chain. It acquired 1 As of March 31, 2015. 1 upstream and downstream companies to • Require each entity to be financially World Bank has provided CRC with a pursue this strategy. In the Jinxi Axle self-supporting. In the COFCO case, the separate note on applying these concepts to case, Jinxi Axle focused its portfolio parent company created an internal CRC’s portfolio. management activities on its strategy of capital market to channel its investment strengthening its technological base and capital to the most worthy projects. In Public Private Partnerships production capacity. the Burlington Northern Santa Fe- Berkshire Hathaway (BNSF) case, the The case studies of Shantou land • Use capital transactions to finance parent company, Berkshire Hathaway, development and French high speed rail execution of the strategy. In the COFCO, carries out this function using a capital PPPs illustrate a number of broadly Jinxi Axle and Russia cases, Initial Public allocation approach focused on creating applicable features of public private Offering (IPO) of shares in profitable long term value. partnerships (PPPs). subsidiaries provided funding for RAILWAY DEVELOPMENT RAILWAY • investments that supported the • Combine management autonomy with PPPs can attract significant social capital. In the France High Speed Rail company’s strategy. accountability for results. In the BNSF Public Private Partnership case, the case, Berkshire Hathaway made the introduction of PPP enabled HSR projects • Rationalize the portfolio to improve managers of subsidiaries such as BNSF to be undertaken sooner than possible efficiency. The COFCO case responsible for all operational decisions. with a traditional financing approach, demonstrates that rationalizing the Berkshire Hathaway aligns the because financing was mobilized from structure and relationships between the managers’ interests with those of its the private sector, local and national companies in the portfolio—grouping shareholders, by providing Berkshire government and the railway. In the ATTRACTING CAPITAL FOR CAPITAL ATTRACTING Shantou case, the local government companies in similar markets and Hathaway stock as incentive transferred responsibility for financing separating them from companies in compensation for exceeding targets on the redevelopment of an urban area unrelated markets—can be necessary to return on capital invested. In the COFCO (estimated at US$ 8.3 billion over 20 CHAPTER 1: 1: CHAPTER improve efficiency. As the UP case case, COFCO creates strong incentives years) from government to a private shows, this rationalization can be for performance through performance company through a PPP. disruptive in the short term, but yields contracts with its manager,
Recommended publications
  • 2018 Annual Report Built Drive to Growth
    BUILT TO DRIVE GROWTH 2018 ANNUAL REPORT BUILT TO DRIVE BUILT GROWTH CP 2018 ANNUAL REPORT PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS $ in millions, except per share data, ratios or unless otherwise indicated 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 EXCHANGELISTINGS FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS Total revenues $ 6,620 $ 6,712 $ 6,232 $ 6,554 $ 7,316 The common shares of Canadian Pacific Railway Limited are (1) Operating income 2,202 2,618 2,411 2,519 2,831 listed on the Toronto and New York stock exchanges under Adjustedoperatingincome(1)(2) 2,198 2,550 2,411 2,468 2,831 the symbol CP. Operating ratio (1) 66.7% 61.0% 61.3% 61.6% 61.3% Adjusted operating ratio (1)(2) 66.7% 62.0% 61.3% 62.4% 61.3% Net income 1,476 1,352 1,599 2,405 1,951 Adjusted income (2) 1,482 1,625 1,549 1,666 2,080 CONTACTUS Diluted earnings per share (EPS) 8.46 8.40 10.63 16.44 13.61 Investor Relations AdjusteddilutedEPS(2) 8.50 10.10 10.29 11.39 14.51 Email: [email protected] Cash from operations 2,123 2,459 2,089 2,182 2,712 Free cash (2) 969 1,381 1,007 874 1,289 Canadian Pacific Investor Relations Return on invested capital (ROIC) (2) 14.4% 12.9% 14.4% 20.5% 15.3% 7550 Ogden Dale Road S.E. Adjusted ROIC (2) 14.5% 15.2% 14.0% 14.7% 16.2% Calgary, AB, Canada T2C 4X9 Shareholder Services STATISTICAL HIGHLIGHTS(3) Email: [email protected] Revenue ton-miles (RTMs) (millions) 149,849 145,257 135,952 142,540 154,207 Canadian Pacific Shareholder Services Carloads (thousands) 2,684 2,628 2,525 2,634 2,740 Office of the Corporate Secretary Gross ton-miles (GTMs) (millions) 272,862 263,344 242,694 252,195 275,362 7550 Ogden Dale Road S.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Another HB Reavis Warsaw Asset Awarded the BREEAM Excellent Certificate
    19 October 2015 Press Release Another HB Reavis Warsaw asset awarded the BREEAM Excellent certificate The Warsaw office complex West Station, currently under construction in the direct vicinity of Warszawa Zachodnia railway station, has been awarded the BREEAM Interim certificate at the Excellent level. The project's developer and owner is HB Reavis. The audit was carried out by Go4Energy. This is the third BREEAM certificate granted to a HB Reavis investment in Warsaw, following Gdański Business Center and Postępu 14 which also received the same honour for their sustainable designs. 'West Station’s recent receipt of the BREEAM Interim certificate at the Excellent level is testament that all of HB Reavis’ projects are developed to the highest standard, using top- quality materials, and modern ecological and technological solutions,' said Stanislav Frnka, President of the Management Board at HB Reavis Poland. He added: 'These credentials are particularly satisfactory given the audit resulted in very high grades in two areas of particular importance to our future tenants - the categories pertaining to the development’s accessibility and to the health and well-being of future tenants'. 'BREEAM is the most highly recognised method for assessing the quality of buildings in Europe. The certification process entails the analysis of ten areas including, among others, energy efficiency, location and access to public transportation and all kinds of services, as well as the quality of construction materials employed. The West Station complex received 73.2% of the maximum number of points under BREEAM Interim. This is an impressive result, which is best evidenced by the fact that only a dozen or so office buildings in the city can to date boast a similar grade,' said Tomasz Augustyniak, a licensed BREEAM Accredited Professional.
    [Show full text]
  • Prices and Costs in the Railway Sector
    ÉCOLE POLYTECHNIQUE FÉDÉRALEDE LAUSANNE ENAC - INTER PRICESPRICES AND AND COSTS COSTS ININ THE THE RAILWAY RAILWAY SECTOR SECTOR J.P.J.P. Baumgartner Baumgartner ProfessorProfessor JanuaryJanuary2001 2001 EPFL - École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne LITEP - Laboratoire d'Intermodalité des Transports et de Planification Bâtiment de Génie civil CH - 1015 Lausanne Tél. : + 41 21 693 24 79 Fax : + 41 21 693 50 60 E-mail : [email protected] LIaboratoire d' ntermodalité des TEP ransports t de lanification URL : http://litep.epfl.ch TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. FOREWORD 1 2. PRELIMINARY REMARKS 1 2.1 The railway equipment market 1 2.2 Figures and scenarios 1 3. INFRASTRUCTURES AND FIXED EQUIPMENT 2 3.1 Linear infrastructures and equipment 2 3.1.1 Studies 2 3.1.2 Land and rights 2 3.1.2.1 Investments 2 3.1.3 Infrastructure 2 3.1.3.1 Investments 2 3.1.3.2 Economic life 3 3.1.3.3 Maintenance costs 3 3.1.4 Track 3 3.1.4.1 Investment 3 3.1.4.2 Economic life of a main track 4 3.1.4.3 Track maintenance costs 4 3.1.5 Fixed equipment for electric traction 4 3.1.5.1 Investments 4 3.1.5.2 Economic life 5 3.1.5.3 Maintenance costs 5 3.1.6 Signalling 5 3.1.6.1 Investments 5 3.1.6.2 Economic life 6 3.1.6.3 Maintenance costs 6 3.2 Spot fixed equipment 6 3.2.1 Investments 7 3.2.1.1 Points, switches, turnouts, crossings 7 3.2.1.2 Stations 7 3.2.1.3 Service and light repair facilities 7 3.2.1.4 Maintenance and heavy repair shops for rolling stock 7 3.2.1.5 Central shops for the maintenance of fixed equipment 7 3.2.2 Economic life 8 3.2.3 Maintenance costs 8 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Systems in Management of Polish Railway Companies of Pkp Group in Aspects of Technology and Economy
    INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN MANAGEMENT Information Systems in Management (2015) Vol. 4 (3) 193 −204 INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN MANAGEMENT OF POLISH RAILWAY COMPANIES OF PKP GROUP IN ASPECTS OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMY MICHAŁ HENRYK RUDOWSKI Institute of Computer Science, Warsaw University of Technology Paper presents selected management information systems in the railway industry companies arising from the transformation of the Polish State Rail- ways into PKP Group. Hardware and software solutions used by this systems and benefits of implement them are also pointed out. Takes into account the areas of financial management as well as the areas of operational manage- ment, specific for their activities. These issues are presented in the context of technology and economy. It has been proved that the organizational solu- tions imply the impossibility of efficient use of resources allocated to infor- mation systems due to consummate the benefits of consolidation, virtualiza- tion and cloud computing is impossible. Keywords: managing systems, railway industry, consolidation, virtualization, cloud computing. 1. Introduction IT is a very important part of modern enterprise and its quality and Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) may determine a competitive advantage in the market. IT solutions are particularly significant in companies on the railway market like PKP Group companies. Modern IT has a number of solutions that increase productivity and significantly lowering TCO, which is the sum of capital and operating costs. Currently the leading role is played by systems operating in the cloud environment with the ability to provide both highest availability and highest performance for the various applications while reducing costs thanks to consolidation, virtualization, automation of service delivery and management.
    [Show full text]
  • N Scale SW1500 Locomotives & Train
    January 2017 Denver & Rio Grande Western® Road Number 810419 This 89’ tri-level closed autorack is orange with black lettering and aluminum roof and runs on Barber Roller Bearing trucks. Built in 1979 as part of series 810352-810456, this enclosed autorack design became the universal standard for most railroads by the mid 1970s, as it prevents vandalism and pilferage and helps to protect vehicles from the elements. This D&RGW marked autorack rides on an ETTX flat. DRGW® is a registered trademark of the Union Pacific Railroad. #111 00 220...$44.95 Shell Oil Louisville & Nashville Road Numbers SCMX 1005/1006 Road Number 41044 These 39’ single dome tank cars are aluminum with black lettering and run on Bettendorf trucks. Built This 50’ auto box car with double side doors and end door is grey with yellow ends and roof and in 1941 at the Milton, PA plant and assigned road numbers 1005 and 1006, these cars were used in the one yellow door and runs on Bettendorf trucks. The Louisville & Nashville railroad used boxcars and transportation of chemical solvents and raw materials for synthetic rubbers. piggyback trailers for transporting company material between cities. Originally red with white reporting marks, they were repainted into the yellow and grey scheme, denoting company materials service in the ONLY TWO NUMBERS early 1970s. #065 00 921...$26.90 #065 00 922...$26.90 #078 00 140...$27.90 Port Huron & Detroit NASA Series Road Number PHD 1042 Road Number NLAX 127 This 50’ rib side box car with single door and no roofwalk is blue with white band and herald and runs on Barber This 57’ converted TOFC flat car is brown with white lettering and runs on Barber Roller Bearing trucks.
    [Show full text]
  • 1991 Rail Vs Truck Fuel Efficiency
    Rail vs. Truck Fuel Efficiency: U.S. Department The Relative Fuel Efficiency of Truck of Transportation Competitive Rail Freight and Federal Railroad Administration Truck Operations Compared in a Range of Corridors Office of Policy FINAL REPORT Abacus Technology Corporation Chevy Chase, Maryland Moving America New Directions, New Opportunities DOT/FRA/RRP-91/2 April 1991 Document is available to the public through the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161 Technical Report Documentation Page 1 • R e p o rt N o . 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catolog No. FRA-RRP-91-02 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Rail vs Truck Fuel Efficiency: The Relative Fuel Efficiency of Truck Competitive Rail Freight and Truck 6. Performing Organizotion Code Operations Compared in a Range of Corridors 8. -Performing Organization Report No. 7. Authors) Abacus Technology Corporation 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Abacus Technology Corporation 5454 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 1100 11. Contract or Grant No. DTFR-53-90-C-00017 Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815 13. Type of Report and Period Covered 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address U.S. Department of Transportation Final Report Federal Railroad Administration Office of Policy, RRP-32 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Washington, DC 20590 Federal Railroad Admin. 15. Supplementary Notes William Gelston (Chief, Economic Studies Division, FRA), Project Sponsor Marilyn W. Klein (Senior Policy Analyst, FRA), Project Monitor 16. Abstract This report summarizes the findings of a study to evaluate the fuel efficiency of rail freight operations relative to competing truckload service. The objective of the study was to identify the circumstances in which rail freight service offers a fuel efficiency advantage over alternative truckload options, and to estimate the fuel savings associated with using rail service.
    [Show full text]
  • Implementation for Polish State Railways Group
    SYSTEMS IMPLEMENTATION POLISH STATE RAILWAYS GROUP Polish State Railways Group (PKP Group) combines its public service GDYNIA with activity characteristic for a modern GDAŃSK enterprise operating in the market OLSZTYN economy. The PKP Group comprises SZCZECIN PKP S.A., the parent company, and ten BIAŁYSTOK companies that provide services, among BYDGOSZCZ others, on railway transport, energy and ICT markets. The mission of the PKP Group companies is to build trust and POZNAŃ improve the image of the railway, so as to SIEDLCE enhance the role of railway transport in WARSZAWA Poland, following the example of modern ZIELONA GÓRA railways operating in Europe. Companies ŁÓDŹ belonging to Polish State Railways Group: PKP CARGO S.A., PKP Intercity WROCŁAW LUBLIN S.A., PKP Linia Hutnicza Szerokotorowa SKARŻYSKO-KAMIENNA Sp. z o.o.. CZĘSTOCHOWA WAŁBRZYCH The companies of the PKP Group TARNOWSKIE GÓRY KIELCE ZAMOŚĆ altogether hire almost 70,000 people – SOSNOWIEC specialists in the railway, IT, ICT, energy RZESZÓW and real property sectors. In terms of the KATOWICE KRAKÓW number of employees, the PKP Group is NOWY SĄCZ the second largest employer in Poland.[1] Locations of Polish State Railways Group subsidiaries. PKP S.A. PKP LHS PKP PLK S.A. PKP SKM PKP CARGO XCITY PKP INTERCITY NATURA TOUR [1] Source: www.pkp.pl PKP INFORMATYKA PKP TELKOM ET GPS Positioning system The ET GPS system is designed to monitor the position of locomotives and wagons. GPS tracker saves the object location, speed, direction of movement and information from sensors and interfaces. The data saved in the internal memory of the GPS tracker are transferred to the monitoring system.
    [Show full text]
  • Product Guide
    2019 PRODUCT GUIDE *Layout and photo by Jay Oberg Experience & Quality You Can Depend On Dear Model Railroader: Welcome to our 2019 Micro-Trains Product Guide. Located in Southern Oregon, Micro-Trains manufactures premier N and Z scale rolling stock, our popular Magne-Matic® Coupler Welcome System, and a variety of model railroad tools and accessories, in our 33,000 sq ft factory. And we’ve been at it for over 46 years! During 2019, we have an array of all new model railroad products, that we’ll be designing, tooling and producing for you, our valued customer. This year our new tooling will include our 11th Heavyweight Passenger car, in this series; the Single Window Coach Car. And given the popularity of our N scale DODX 68’ flat car with military loads; we’ll be producing our own injection-molded multipurpose, light 4-wheel drive military utility vehicle known as the Humvee, as the next military load for our DODX flat cars. Already underway, Micro-Trains has been enhancing our ever-popular 40’ and 50’ box cars by lowering the car’s underframe to the rail, and offering “cored through”, injection-molded roof walks, similar to what we’ve already done with our 50’ box car roof walks. In addition, we’re modifying the cars to body-mount couplers, and where appropriate adding etched metal brake platforms to the car ends. We’re essentially making the best N scale rolling stock, even better! In addition to tooling up all new rail cars and accessories, Micro-Trains continues the tradition of issuing prototypical railcar series during 2019; we’ll be introducing our “Farm- to-Table” Reefer series in both N and Z scale.
    [Show full text]
  • Montana HI-LINE
    Montana HI-LINE USER MANUAL Contents Introduction, History, Operations Page 2 Locomotives, Overview Page 2 Locomotives, Cab Controls Page 4 Rolling Stock Page 6 Scenarios Page 10 Signals and Infrastructure Page 12 Route Maps Page 14 Credits and Acknowledgements Page 15 ©Copyright 2019 VNHRR and Dovetail Games, all rights reserved Rev 4, 2019 Page 1 Introduction This route is a model of the east half of the BNSF Hi-Line Subdivion, which runs straight across Montana's high plains from Shelby to Havre. Its western terminus, Shelby, connects to the Marias Pass route DLC from Dovetail Games, thus completing the entire Hi-Line Subdivision from Whitefish to Havre in Train Simulator. History The Hi-Line subdivision is part of BNSF's busy northern transcontinental mainline (Chicago-Seattle). It was originally built in the late 19th century by James J. Hill's Great Northern Railway (GN) and is the northernmost of the transcontinental railroads in the United States. The building of the Great Northern mainline brought a settlement boom to the plains of Montana, many of the small towns and villages along what is today called the Hi-Line subdivision where established during or shortly after the construction of the railroad. Havre and Shelby, the two end points of this route, were important junction points on the Great Northern. At Havre, a secondary mainline, routed through the beautiful upper Missouri canyon, branched off towards Great Falls, MT, an important traffic hub in the GN network. That line no longer exists today, only two short branch lines from Havre to Big Sandy in the north and from Great Falls to Fort Benton in the south remain in (very infrequent) service.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Maine State Rail Plan
    Maine State Rail Plan TABLE OF CONTENTSview Chapter 1 Framework of the Maine State Rail Plan 1.1 Purpose of the State Rail Plan 1.1 1.2 Visions, Goals, Objectives of the Maine State Rail Plan 1.3 1.3 Transportation and Rail Planning in Maine 1.6 . Figure 1-1: MaineDOT Organizational Chart 1.7 . Figure 1-2: Maine’s MPO Areas 1.10 . Figure 1-3: Regional Planning and Development Councils 1.11 1.4 Public and Stakeholder Involvement 1.12 1.5 Review of Freight and Passenger Rail Planning Studies 1.17 1.6 Evaluation Criteria 1.18 Chapter 2 Freight Rail System 2.1 Overview 2.1 . Figure 2-1: North American Class I Rail Connections 2.2 . Figure 2-2: Map of MM&A Abandonment 2.6 . Figure 2-3: State of Maine Owned Rail Status 2.10 2.2 Freight Rail Industry Development 2.10 2.3 Maine’s Freight Railroad Facilities 2.12 2.4 International, National and Regional Context 2.21 . Figure 2-4: Canadian Class I Connections to Maine System 2.21 . Figure 2-5: Northeast U.S. Rail Freight System 2.22 . Figure 2-6: NS, CP, PAS and PAR Corridors 2.23 . Figure 2-7: Railroad Return on Investment and Cost of Capital 2.24 2.5 Freight Rail Issues and System Constraints 2.24 . Figure 2-8: Estimated National Highway System Peak-Period Congestion 2.25 . Figure 2-9: Estimated Rail Freight Service Levels, 2035 2.25 . Figure 2-10: Rail Clearance and Weight Constraints 2.28 .
    [Show full text]
  • The PKP Group 2016 About the PKP Group 3
    2016 Contents 2 1. About the PKP Group 2. Scheme of the PKP Group 3. The Main Companies of the PKP Group: • PKP S.A. • PKP PLK • PKP Cargo • PKP Intercity • PKP LHS • PKP SKM • PKP Informatyka • Xcity Investment The PKP Group 2016 About the PKP Group 3 The PKP Group was established in 2001 as a result of the restructuring process of the Polskie Koleje Państwowe (Polish State Railways) the State Owned Enterprise. Polskie Koleje Państwowe Spółka Akcyjna was established on 1 January 2001 as a result of the commercialization of the Polskie Koleje Państwowe SOE and entered into the rights and obligations of its predecessor. On the basis of the Polskie Koleje Państwowe SOE a number of companies were established in 2001 in the areas of: railway passenger transport; freight transport; railway infrastructure management; in addition, the following entities were established: • nine companies providing services for infrastructure renovations and repairs; • two companies dealing with rolling stock repairs; • three companies operating in secondary areas, such as training, pharmacy and supplies; • five companies operating in other areas related to railway services. The PKP Group 2016 About the PKP Group 4 As the result of the ownership changes, including privatization and restructuring in 2016 the PKP Group consisted of: Polskie Koleje Państwowe Spółka Akcyjna – the Parent Company in the PKP Group; PKP Intercity S.A. and PKP Szybka Kolej Miejska w Trójmieście Sp. z o.o. (also being the infrastructure manager of No. 250 Urban Line) – the passenger transport operator; PKP CARGO S.A. and PKP Linia Hutnicza Szerokotorowa Sp. z o.o.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2020
    2020 ANNUAL REPORT JOY CITY PROPERTY LIMITED ANNUAL REPORT 2020 CConttribbutee quualitty greeen liviing sppaca e annd sservicees, leadd thhe treennd of a faashhionaabble liffessttylee, iin orddeer to beecoomee a leaadder aammong reeall esttate brands in thhe PPRC wiwith thhee greeata eest ssustainnabble ddevvelooppmment pootenntiaal. MMaximizee thee benefits off custtomerss, sharehooldeers and staff memberrs wwhoolehearrtedly. CONTENTS Company Profile 2 Corporate Governance Report 73 Major Business Structure 4 Directors’ Report 85 Major Events and Awards 6 Five Years Financial Summary 108 Financial Highlights 12 Independent Auditor’s Report 109 Chairman’s Statement 14 Financial Statements and Notes 113 Joy-Full Occasions 17 Definitions 248 Management Discussion and Analysis 25 Corporate Information 252 Profile of Directors and Senior Management 65 2 Joy City Property Limited Annual Report 2020 Company Profile Joy City Property Limited is a large-scale Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area, Chengdu-Chongqing and commercial property developer and operator, middle Yangtze River. Meanwhile, the Group successfully focusing on the development, operation, established its presence in 20 cities including Beijing, sales, leasing and management of complexes Shanghai, Tianjin, Shenyang, Yantai, Jinan, Hangzhou, and commercial properties in the PRC. Chengdu, Xi’an, Chongqing, Qingdao, Wuhan, Kunming, Sanya, Changsha, Suzhou, Xiamen, Nanchang, Wuxi and COFCO Corporation, the ultimate controlling shareholder Anshan in mainland China and Hong Kong. It possesses or of Joy City Property Limited, is one of the 49 major state- manages 23 Joy City urban complexes, 3 Joy Breeze projects owned enterprises under the administration of the Central and premium investment properties at prime locations in Government of China, and has been selected as one of the first-tier cities, including Beijing COFCO Plaza, Hong Kong Fortune Global 500 for more than 26 consecutive years COFCO Tower and Beijing COFCO • Landmark Tower, since 1995.
    [Show full text]