<<

Sampling on Hyperbolic Surfaces

Stephen CASEY Department of Mathematics and Statistics, American University, Washington, DC 20016 USA [email protected]

Abstract—We discuss harmonic analysis in the setting of hy- we have Plancherel-Parseval – kfk 2 = kfk hf, gi = L (R) b L2(b) perbolic space, and then focus on sampling theory on hyperbolic R hf,b gbi. The Paley-Wiener Space PWΩ is defined as PWΩ = surfaces. We connect sampling theory with the geometry of 2 the signal and its domain. It is relatively easy to demonstrate {f continuous : f, fb ∈ L , supp(fb) ⊂ [−Ω, Ω]} . The this connection in Euclidean spaces, but one quickly gets into Whittaker-Kotel’nikov-Shannon (W-K-S) Sampling Theorem open problems when the underlying space is not Euclidean. We applies to functions in PWΩ. discuss how to extend this connection to and general surfaces, outlining an Erlangen-type program for Theorem I.1 (W-K-S Sampling Theorem). Let f ∈ PWΩ, sampling theory. π sincT (t) = sin( T t)/πt, and δnT (t) = δ(t − nT ). 1) If T ≤ 1/2Ω, then for all t ∈ , I.INTRODUCTION R ! This paper discusses harmonic analysis in the setting of X  f(t) = T δ · f ∗ sinc (t) . (I.1) hyperbolic space, and then focuses on developing sampling nT T n∈ theory on surfaces with an intrinsic hyperbolic geometry. Z We start with a brief discussion of sampling in Euclidean 2) If T ≤ 1/2Ω and f(nT ) = 0 for all n ∈ Z, then f ≡ 0. space. Section 2 gives an overview of surfaces. This discussion will show the key role of hyperbolic space in general surface II.GEOMETRY OF SURFACES theory. It concludes with a discussion of the Uniformization A surface is a generalization of the Euclidean plane. This Theorem, which gives that all orientable surfaces inherit their section discusses the geometry of surfaces, and, in particular, intrinsic geometry from their universal covers. There are only three important surfaces – the complex plane C, the Riemann three of these covers – the plane C (), the sphere Ce, and the unit disc D. Background material for this Ce (spherical geometry), and the hyperbolic section can be found in many texts, e.g., [7], [8]. We assume disk D (hyperbolic geometry). We then develop harmonic our surfaces are connected and orientable. Therefore, we can analysis in a general setting, looking at the Fourier-Helgason choose a coordinate system so that differential forms are transform and its inversion in the context of Euclidean, spher- positive. We consider Riemann surfaces, but our discussion ical, and hyperbolic geometries. Section 3 discusses harmonic carries through to connected and orientable Riemannian man- Analysis in hyperbolic space, and we conclude with a sampling ifolds of two. Riemann surfaces allow us to discuss formula for a hyperbolic surface. This uses the covering theory the , which gives that all orientable discussed in Section 2. surfaces inherit their intrinsic geometry from their universal There are numerous motivations for extending sampling to coverings. non-Euclidean geometries, and in particular, hyperbolic geom- Klein’s Erlangen program sought to characterize and clas- etry. Irregular sampling of band-limited functions by iteration sify the different geometries on the basis of projective ge- in hyperbolic space is possible, as shown by Feichtinger and ometry and group theory. Since there is a lot of freedom Pesenson and Christensen and Olafsson´ ([4], [5]). Hyperbolic in , due to the fact that its properties space and its importance in Electrical Impedance Tomography do not depend on a metric, projective geometry became the (EIT) and Network Tomography has been mentioned in several unifying frame of all other geometries. Also, group theory papers of Berenstein et. al. and some methods developed in provided a useful way to organize and abstract the ideas of papers of Kuchment. More details of these applications may symmetry for each geometry. The different geometries need be found in [2], [4]. The paper [2] includes applications to their own appropriate languages for their underlying concepts, network tomography, with emphasis on the internet. since objects like circles and angles are not preserved under Classical sampling theory applies to functions that are projective transformations. Instead, one could talk about the square integrable and band-limited. A function in L2(R) subgroups and normal subgroups created by the different R −2πitω whose Fourier transform fb(ω) = f(t)e dt is com- concepts of each geometry, and use this to create relations R pactly supported and has several smoothness and growth between other geometries. The underlying group structure is properties given in the Paley-Wiener Theorem (see, e.g., [12], the group of under which the geometry is invariant. [9]). The choice to have 2π in the exponent simplifies certain Isometries are functions that preserve distances and angles of 1 2 1 2 3 expressions, e.g., for f, g ∈ L ∩ L (R), f,b gb ∈ L ∩ L (Rb), all points in the set. A property of surfaces in R is said to be intrinsic if it is preserved by , i.e., if it can be Theorem II.1 (The Uniformization Theorem). Let S be a determined from any point on the surface. Isometries can be . modeled as the groups of symmetries of the geometry. Thus, 1.) Every surface admits a Riemannian metric of constant the hierarchies of the symmetry groups give a way for us to Gaussian curvature κ. define the hierarchies of the geometries. We explore the groups 2.) Every simply connected Riemann surface is conformally of isometries for three geometries – Euclidean, spherical, and equivalent to one of the following: hyperbolic. We present the Uniformization Theorem, which a.) C with Euclidean Geometry (parabolic) – κ = 0 – shows that for connected and orientable surfaces, these are with isometries the only intrinsic geometries.   D iθ E We say that Se is an unlimited covering of S provided that e z + α , ◦ , where α ∈ C and θ ∈ [0, 2π) , for every curve γ on S and every ζe ∈ Se with f(ζe) = γ(0), there exists a curve γe on Se with initial point ζe and f(γe) = γ. b.) Ce with Spherical Geometry (elliptic) – κ = 1 – with The curve γe is called a lift of γ. This is generally referred isometries to as the curve lifting property, and it follows directly for an   D αz + β E 2 2 unlimited, unramified covering. , ◦ , where α, β ∈ C and |α| +|β| = 1 , −βz + α Given a point z0 on a Riemann surface S, we consider all c.) with Hyperbolic Geometry (hyperbolic) – κ = −1 closed curves on S passing through z0. We say that any two D of these paths are equivalent whenever they are homotopic. – with isometries The set of these equivalence classes forms a group with the D z − α  E eiθ , ◦ , where |α| < 1 and θ ∈ [0, 2π) . operation of multiplication of equivalence classes of paths. 1 − αz This group is called the of S based at Proof is given in Farkas and Kra [7], Section IV.6. We may z and denoted as π (S, z ). Since all Riemann surfaces are 0 1 0 extend Uniformization to orientable Riemannian manifolds of path connected, given any two points z , z on S, the groups 0 1 dimension two. In fact, every orientable topological two-real- π (S, z ) and π (S, z ) are isomorphic. This allows us to refer 1 0 1 1 dimensional manifold with a countable basis for its topology to the fundamental group of S (π (S)) by picking any base 1 admits a Riemann surface structure [7]. The consequences of point on S. Note, if S is simply connected, π (S) is trivial. 1 the Uniformization Theorem can be stared very succinctly. The There is an important connection between π (S) and the 1 only covering surface of Riemann sphere Ce is itself, with the smooth unlimited covering spaces S of S. If S is a smooth e e covering map being the identity. The plane C is the universal unlimited of S, then π1(Se) is isomorphic to covering space of itself, the once punctured plane C \{z0} a subgroup of π1(S). Conversely, every subgroup of π1(S) (with covering map exp(z −z0)), and all tori C/Γ, where Γ is determines a smooth unlimited covering corresponding to the a parallelogram generated by z 7−→ z +nγ1 +mγ2 , n, m ∈ Z space S. Given that the trivial group is a subgroup of every e and γ1, γ2 are two fixed complex numbers linearly independent group, the group of π (S) determines a simply connected 1 over R. The universal covering space of every other Riemann smooth unlimited covering space S, which is called the uni- e surface is the hyperbolic disk D. This last result demonstrates versal cover, i.e., the universal covering space is the covering the importance of hyperbolic space. space corresponding to the trivial subgroup of π1(S). Given a connected Riemann surface S and its universal III.HARMONIC ANALYSIS IN NON-EUCLIDEAN DOMAINS covering space Se, S is isomorphic to Se/Γ, where the group In a very general setting, we can discuss a harmonic analysis Γ is isomorphic to the fundamental group of S, π1(S) (see of a locally compact Hausdorff space X which is acted [7], [8]). The corresponding universal covering is simply the upon transitively by a locally compact topological group G quotient map which sends every point of Se to its orbit under [11]. (Recall that a topological group G is a group equipped Γ. Thus, the fundamental group of S determines its universal with a topology such that multiplication and inversion are cover. Moreover, the universal covering is indeed the “biggest” continuous maps.) We will assume that X has a positive smooth unlimited covering of a connected Riemann surface, in measure µ, and that G leaves this measure invariant, e.g., µ the sense that all other unramified unlimited covering spaces is Lebesgue measure on R, and G is the set of normalized of a Riemann surface can be covered unlimitedly and without linear translations. If G is also abelian, we define a character ramification by the universal covering of this surface. as a continuous group homomorphism ϕ : G → T. The set The Uniformization Theorem allows us to classify all uni- of characters form a group Gb under pointwise multiplication, versal covers of all Riemann surfaces. This in turn allows us to the dual group. Let f ∈ L1(G). The Fourier transform is the R understand the geometry of every Riemann surface. An open mapping fb : Gb → C defined by fb(ϕ) = G f(x)ϕ(x)dµ(x) . R −ixω Riemann surface is called hyperbolic if the maximum principle (In R, this gives fb(ω) = f(x)e dx.) 2 R is not valid. This is equivalent to the existence of a Green’s Let f ∈ L (X) and g ∈ G, and define TX (g)f(x) as −1 function and a harmonic measure. An open Riemann surface TX (g)f(x) = f(g · x) . Then TX is the unitary representa- is called parabolic if it does not have these properties. Closed tion of G acting on L2(X). (Recall that a representation of Riemann surfaces are elliptic. G is a pair (T,H), where H is a separable Hilbert space and T : G → GL(H), where GL(H) is the group of invertible normalize the Haar measure dg on SL(2, R) so that linear maps on H.) The representation is unitary if it preserves Z dxdy Z the inner product. It is called irreducible if there is no closed f(z) = f(g(i))dg . y2 proper subspace W of H such that T (g)W ⊂ W for all U SL(2,R) g ∈ G.) A harmonic analysis of X is the decomposition of The Hilbert space L2(SL(2, R) is the space of square TX into irreducible elements [10], [11]. integrable functions with the inner product Recall that a Lie group is a locally Euclidean topological Z dx dy group whose group operations are C∞ maps. Let us add more hf, gi = f(z)g(z) . y2 structure to X by letting X = G/K be a , U where the group of symmetries of X contains an inversion The Laplacian ∆ on U is symmetric and given by symmetry about every point. Symmetric spaces are Rieman-  ∂2 ∂2  nian manifolds whose curvature tensor is invariant under all 2 ∆ = y 2 + 2 . parallel transports. This holds if and only if each ∂x ∂y symmetry γ(s) → γ(−s) at a point x is a local isometry. For 2 −1 2 If f, ∆f ∈ L (U), then hf, ∆fi ≤ 4 kfk . The Fourier- this to hold globally, the space must possess a transitive group Helgason transform is defined by K of isometries. Then, X = G/K is a Z dx dy of a Lie group G, where K is a compact subgroup of G, and s fb(s, ρ) = f(z)(Im (kρ(z)) , y2 where the Lie algebra of K is an involution of the Lie algebra U G of . We can now use the machinery of the Lie theory. Let for s ∈ , ρ ∈ , and kρ ∈ SO(2) being a by angle ∞ C T E denote the set of C functions on X, and D denote the ρ. For f ∈ D( ), this has the inversion, for t ∈ , ∞ U R set of C functions on X which have compact support. We Z Z D(G/K) 1 (it+1/2) can consider the algebra of all differential operators fb((it+1/2), ρ)(Im (kρ(z)) t tanh(πt)dρ dt . 8π2 on X which are invariant under all translations of cosets R T xK by g ∈ G, i.e., τ(g): xK −→ gxK . A function on The map f −→ fb extends to an isometry from (L2( ), dµ) X U which is an eigenfunction (actually, eigendistribution) of onto (L2( × , ( 1 t tanh(πt)dρ dt)). D ∈ D(G/K) joint eigenfunction D(G/K) R T 8π2 each is a of . Let These provide us the tools for harmonic analysis on . ϕ : D(G/K) −→ U C and Analogously, we can develop hyperbolic geometry in the unit z−i Eϕ(X) = {f ∈ E(X): Df = ϕ(D)f for all D ∈ D(G/K)} . disk D = {z ∈ C : |z| < 1}. The mapping w = T (z) = z+i conformally maps U to D and is an isometry from (U, dsU) E (X) is called a joint eigenspace. Let T be the represen- −1 z+1 ϕ ϕ to (D, ds ). The inverse mapping is z = T (w) = −i . tation (T (g)f)(x) = f(g−1x) .T is called an eigenspace D z−1 ϕ ϕ From the group theoretic viewpoint, SL(2, R) ∼ SU(1, 1). representation. Let dz denote the area measure on D, and let the measure A harmonic analysis in this setting is the study of the dv be given by the SU(1, 1)-invariant measure on D given following. First, the decomposition of arbitrary functions on by dv(z) = dz/(1 − |z|2)2. The isometries are the Mobius-¨ G/K into joint eigenfunctions of D(G/K). Second, the Blaschke transformations of D onto D, given by cataloging of Eϕ(X), joint eigenspaces of D(G/K). Third, iθ z − α determining the set of maps ϕ for which Tϕ is irreducible [10], ϕθ,α(z) = e , α ∈ D, θ ∈ [0, 2π) . [11]. Given that K is compact, then X = G/K is Riemannian 1 − αz and hence the algebra D(G/K) contains an elliptic operator, The Laplacian ∆ on D is symmetric and given by the Laplacian. Therefore, every eigenfunction is an analytic  ∂2 ∂2  function. ∆ = (1 − x2 − y2)−2 + . ∂x2 ∂y2 IV. HARMONIC ANALYSIS IN HYPERBOLIC SPACE Let hz, bi denote the minimal hyperbolic distance from Let z = x + iy ∈ , with x = 0}. SL(2, R) is the set of 2×2 matrices Eigenfunctions of ∆ are of the form eβhz,bi. We have that with determinant one, and SO(2) = {A ∈ O(2) : det A = 1}. (iλ+1)hz,bi 2 (iλ+1)hz,bi The action of SL(2, R) on U is given by ∆(e ) = −(λ + 1)e , λ ∈ C ,  az + b  and that the eigenfunctions of ∆ are the functions g(z) = : ad − bc = 1 . cz + d Z f(z) = e(iλ+1)hz,bi dµ(b) , SL(2, ) acts transitively on with SO(2) being the stabi- R U T lizer of i, giving the identification for λ > 0 and b ∈ T, and where µ is an analytic functional U = SL(2, R)/SO(2) . on T. Let E(D) denote the set of C∞ functions on D, and let We have that U has Riemannian metric ds2 = y−2(dx2 +dy2) −2 2 and corresponding Riemannian measure dµ = y (dx dy). We Eλ(D) = {f ∈ E(D) : ∆(f) = −(λ + 1)(f)} . For λ ∈ C, let Tλ be the representation of SU(1, 1) on the ρ = dist(xj, ∂D < r/4). In this case, refine the covering eigenspace of Eλ(D). Then Tλ is irreducible if and only if in those covering elements with B(xj, ρ). iλ + 1 6∈ 2Z. Let ϕj be smooth non-negative functions which are sup- P Let T = ∂D. By identifying the eigenfunctions of ∆ and ported in B(xj, r/2) and satisfy that j ϕj = 1D and define determining the set of maps ϕ for which Tϕ is irreducible, the operator we can write down, for functions f ∈ L1(D, dv), the Fourier-   Helgason transform, which is defined as X T f(x) = PΩ  f(xj)ϕj(x) , Z j fb(λ, b) = f(z)e(−iλ+1)hz,bi dv(z) 2 D where PΩ is the orthogonal projection from L (D, dv) onto 2 2 ( ). By decreasing r (and thus choosing x closer) one for λ > 0, b ∈ T, and dv(z) = dz/(1 − |z| ) . The PWΩ D j 2 can obtain the inequality kI − T k < 1, in which case T can mapping f → fb extends to an isometry L (D, dv) → ∞ be inverted by T −1f = P (I − T )kf. For given samples, L2(R+ × T, (2π)−1λ tanh(λπ/2)dλ db), i.e., the Plancherel k=0 R 2 dz we can calculate T f and the Neumann series. This provides formula becomes |f(z)| 2 2 = D (1−|z| ) the recursion formula Z 1 2 |fb(λ, b)| λ tanh(λπ/2)dλ db. fn+1 = fn + T f − T fn . 2π + R ×T We have that limn→∞ fn = f with norm convergence. The db Here denotes the normalized measure on the circle T, such rate of convergence is determined by the estimate kfn − fk ≤ that R db = 1, and dλ is Lebesgue measure on . The n+1 T R kI − T k kfk. Fourier-Helgason inversion formula is Theorem V.1 (Irregular Sampling by Iteration). Let S be 1 Z Z f(z) = fb(λ, b)e(iλ+1)hz,biλ tanh(λπ/2) dλ db . a hyperbolic Riemann surface with universal covering D. 2π + R T Then there exists an (r, N)-lattice on S such that given f ∈ = (S), f can be reconstructed from its We also note that ∆f(λ, b) = −(λ2 + 1)f(λ, b). PWΩ PWΩ c b samples on the lattice via the recursion formula

V. SAMPLINGONA HYPERBOLIC SURFACE fn+1 = fn + T f − T fn .

The Uniformization Theorem demonstrates the importance We have fn+1 → f as n → ∞ in norm. The rate of n+1 of hyperbolic geometry. The only covering surface of Riemann convergence is kfn − fk ≤ kI − T k kfk. sphere Ce is itself, with the covering map being the identity. REFERENCES The plane C is the universal covering space of itself, the once [1] J.J. Benedetto, Harmonic Analysis and Applications, CRC Press, Boca punctured plane C\{z0} (with covering map exp(z−z0)), and Raton, FL (1997). all tori C/Γ, where Γ is a parallelogram generated by z 7−→ [2] Casey, S.D., “Harmonic Analysis in Non-Euclidean Spaces: Theory and z + nγ1 + mγ2 , n, m ∈ Z and γ1, γ2 are two fixed complex Application,” Chapter 6 in Recent Applications of Harmonic Analysis numbers linearly independent over R. The universal covering to Function Spaces, Differential Equations, and Data Science (Novel Methods in Harmonic Analysis, Volume 2), Springer-Birkhauser¨ book space of every other Riemann surface is the hyperbolic disk in the Applied and Numerical Harmonic Analysis Series – pp. 565-601 D. Let’s refer to these surfaces as hyperbolic surfaces. Given (2017). a connected hyperbolic Riemann surface S and its universal [3] Casey, S.D., “Poisson Summation and Selberg Trace,” 2017 Interna- tional Conference on Sampling Theory and Applications (SAMPTA covering space D, S is isomorphic to D/Γ, where the group 2017), IEEE Xplore, pp. 96-100 (2017). Γ is isomorphic to the fundamental group of S, π1(S). The [4] S.D. Casey and J.G. Christensen, “Sampling in Euclidean and Non- corresponding universal covering is simply the quotient map Euclidean Domains: A Unified Approach,” Chapter 9 in Sampling The- ory, a Renaissance, Appl. Numer. Harmon. Anal., Birkhauser/Springer,¨ which sends every point of D to its orbit under Γ. New York, 331–359 (2015). 2 A function f ∈ L (D, dv) is called band-limited if its [5] J.G. Christensen and G. Olafsson,´ Sampling in spaces of bandlimited Fourier-Helgason transform fb is supported inside a bounded functions on commutative spaces. Excursions in harmonic analysis + (Volume 1), Appl. Numer. Harmon. Anal., Birkhauser/Springer,¨ New subset [0, Ω] of R . The collection of band-limited functions York, 35–69 (2013). with band-limit inside a set [0, Ω] will be denoted PWΩ = [6] A. Deitmar and S. Echterhoff, Priciples of Harmonic Analysis (Second Edition), Springer, New York, 35–69 (2014). Ω( ). This shows that sampling is possible for band- PW D [7] Farkas, H.M, and Kra, I., Riemann Surfaces. Springer-Verlag, New York limited functions. If f ∈ PWΩ(D), f satisfies the following (1980). Bernstein inequality – k∆nfk ≤ (1 + |Ω|2)n/2kfk. We can [8] Forster, O., Lectures on Riemann Surfaces. Springer-Verlag, New York find a natural number N such that for any sufficiently small (1981). [9] K. Grochenig,¨ Foundations of Time-Frequency Analysis, Birkhauser,¨ r, there are points xj ∈ D for which B(xj, r/4) are disjoint, P Boston (2000). B(xj, r/2) cover D, and 1 ≤ j χB(xj ,r) ≤ N. Such a [10] S. Helgason, Geometric Analysis on Symmetric Spaces, American Math- ematical Society, Providence, RI (1994). collection of {xj} will be called an (r, N)-lattice. Use this [11] S. Helgason, Groups and Geometric Analysis, American Mathematical covering on the fundamental domain D, which is a subregion Society, Providence, RI (2000). of D. At points of the covering intersecting the boundary [12] J.R. Higgins, Sampling Theory in Fourier and Signal Analysis: Founda- of the universal cover, a refined covering is needed when tions, Clarendon Press, Oxford (1996).