Conservation, Conflict, and Community Context: Insights from Indian Tiger Reserves
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Important Facts for Prelims (31St December 2018)
Important Facts for Prelims (31st December 2018) drishtiias.com/printpdf/important-facts-for-prelims-31st-december-2018 M-STrIPES There has been an increase in the number of poachers arrested by forest officials in past one year. The mobile app, M-STrIPES, used for surveillance and patrolling of tiger-populated areas has played a major role in this. M-STrIPES (Monitoring System For Tigers-Intensive Protection and Ecological Status) This app was developed by the National Tiger Conservation Authority and the Wildlife Institute of India in 2010. M-STrIPES allows patrol teams to keep a better tab on suspicious activity while also mapping the patrolling, location, routes and timings of forest officials. The App was also used in the All India-Tiger Estimation. Dudhwa Tiger Reserve The Dudhwa Tiger Reserve is a protected area in Uttar Pradesh that stretches mainly across the Lakhimpur Kheri and Bahraich districts. It comprises of the Dudhwa National Park, Kishanpur Wildlife Sanctuary and Katerniaghat Wildlife Sanctuary. Dudhwa is home to a number of wildlife species, including the Bengal Tiger, Gangetic dolphin, rhinoceros, leopard, hispid hare, sambhar, swamp deer, hog deer, cheetah, sloth bear, elephant and over 450 species of birds. One District One Product (ODOP) Prime Minister of India recently attended a regional summit of ODOP scheme in Varanasi. ODOP Scheme was launched by the Uttar Pradesh Government to give a boost to traditional industries, synonymous with the respective state's districts. 1/2 Through this scheme, the state government wants to help local handicraft industries and products to gain national and international recognition through branding, marketing support, and easy credit. -
List of World Heritage Sites in India
www.gradeup.co 1 www.gradeup.co List of World Heritage Sites in India Cultural Heritage sites in India 1 Agra Fort Uttar Pradesh 2 Ajanta Caves Maharashtra 3 Ellora Caves Maharashtra 4 Taj Mahal Uttar Pradesh 5 Group of Monuments at Mahabalipuram Tamil Nadu 6 Sun Temple, Konârak Orissa 7 Churches and Convents of Goa Goa 8 Fatehpur Sikri Uttar Pradesh 9 Group of Monuments at Hampi Karnataka 10 Khajuraho Group of Monuments Madhya Pradesh 11 Elephanta Caves Maharashtra 12 Great Living Chola Temples 12 Tamil Nadu 13 Group of Monuments at Pattadakal Karnataka 14 Buddhist Monuments at Sanchi Madhya Pradesh 15 Humayun's Tomb Delhi 16 Qutb Minar and its Monuments Delhi Mountain Railways of India (Includes Darjeeling Himachal Pradesh, 17 Himalayan Railway, the Nilgiri Mountain Railway and the Sikkim, Tamilnadu Kalka-Shimla Railway) 18 Mahabodhi Temple Complex at Bodh Gaya Bihar 19 Rock Shelters of Bhimbetka Madhya Pradesh 20 Champaner-Pavagadh Archaeological Park Gujarat Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus (formerly Victoria 21 Mumbai Terminus) 22 Red Fort Complex Delhi 23 The Jantar Mantar Jaipur, Rajasthan Hill Forts of Rajasthan (Chittorgarh, Kumbhalgarh, 24 Ranthambore Fort, Gagron Fort, Amber Fort and Rajasthan Jaisalmer Fort) 25 Rani-ki-Vav at Patan Gujarat Archaeological Site of Nalanda Mahavihara (Nalanda 26 Bihar University) Capitol Building Complex - The Architectural Work of Le 27 Chandigarh Corbusier 28 Historic City of Ahmadabad Gujarat Mumbai, 29 Victorian Gothic and Art Deco Ensembles Maharashtra Natural Heritage sites in India 1 Kaziranga -
Bhadra Voluntary Relocation India
BHADRA VOLUNTARY RELOCATION INDIA INDIA FOREWORD During my tenure as Director Project Tiger in the Ministry of Environment and Forests, Govt. of India, I had the privilege of participating in voluntary relocation of villages from Bhadra Tiger Reserve. As nearly two decades have passed, whatever is written below is from my memory only. Mr Yatish Kumar was the Field Director of Bhadra Tiger Reserve and Mr Gopalakrishne Gowda was the Collector of Chikmagalur District of Karnataka during voluntary relocation in Bhadra Tiger Reserve. This Sanctuary was notified as a Tiger Reserve in the year 1998. After the notification as tiger reserve, it was necessary to relocate the existing villages as the entire population with their cattle were dependent on the Tiger Reserve. The area which I saw in the year 1998 was very rich in flora and fauna. Excellent bamboo forests were available but it had fire hazard too because of the presence of villagers and their cattle. Tiger population was estimated by Dr. Ullas Karanth and his love for this area was due to highly rich biodiversity. Ultimately, resulted in relocation of all the villages from within the reserve. Dr Karanth, a devoted biologist was a close friend of mine and during his visit to Delhi he proposed relocation of villages. As the Director of Project Tiger, I was looking at voluntary relocation of villages for tribals only from inside Tiger Reserve by de-notifying suitable areas of forests for relocation, but in this case the villagers were to be relocated by purchasing a revenue land which was very expensive. -
CP Vol VIII EIA
GOVERNMENT OF UTTAR PRADESH Public Works Department Uttar Pradesh Core Road Network Development Program Part – A: Project Preparation DETAILED PROJECT REPORT Volume - VIII: Environmental Impact Assessment Report and Environmental Management Plan Gola – Shahjahanpur Road (SH-93) July 2015 India Consulting engineers pvt. ltd. Uttar Pradesh Core Road Network Development Program DETAILED PROJECT REPORT Volume-VIII: EIA and EMP Report Gola – Shahjahanpur Road (SH-93) Volume-VIII : Environmental Impact Assessment Report (EIA) and Document Name Environmental Management Plan (EMP) (Detailed Project Report) Document Number EIRH1UP020/DPR/SH-93/GS/004/VIII Uttar Pradesh Core Road Network Development Program Project Name Part – A: Project Preparation including Detailed Engineering Design and Contract Documentation Project Number EIRH1UP020 Document Authentication Name Designation Prepared by Dr. S.S. Deepak Environmental Specialist Reviewed by Sudhendra Kumar Karanam Sr. General Manager (Roads & Highways) Rajeev Kumar Gupta Deputy Team Leader Avadesh Singh Technical Head Approved by Rick Camise Team Leader History of Revisions Version Date Description of Change(s) Rev. 0 19/12/2014 First Submission Rev. 1 29/12/2014 Second Submission after incorporating World Bank’s Comments and Suggestions Rev. 2 13/01/2015 Incorporating World Bank’s Comments and Suggestions Rev. 3 16/07/2015 Revision after discussion with Independent Consultant Page i| Rev: R3 , Uttar Pradesh Core Road Network Development Program DETAILED PROJECT REPORT Volume-VIII: EIA and EMP -
Bibliography on Tiger (Panthera Tigris L.)
Bibliography on Tiger (Panthera tigris L.) Global Tiger Forum Publication 2014 Copyright © Secretariat of Global Tiger Forum, 2014 Suggested Citation: Gopal R., Majumder A. and Yadav S.P. (Eds) (2014). Bibliography on Tiger (Panther tigris L.). Compiled and published by Global Tiger Forum, p 95. Cover Pic Vinit Arora Inside pictures taken by Vinit Arora, Samir K. Sinha, Aniruddha Majumder and S.P.Yadav CONTENTS Acknowledgements i Introduction to Bibliography on tiger 1 Literature collection and compilation process for bibliography on tiger 2-4 1) Ecology, Natural History and Taxonomy 5-23 2) Aspects of Conflicts 24-35 3) Monitoring (tiger, co-predator, prey and habitat) and Status 36-62 evaluation 4) Genetics, morphology, health and disease monitoring 63-75 5) Protection, Conservation, Policies and Bio-politics 76-95 Acknowledgements The “Bibliography on Tiger (Panthera tigris L.)” is an outcome of the literature database on tiger, brought out by the Global Tiger Forum (GTF). The GTF is thankful to all officials, scientists, conservationists from 13 Tiger Range Countries for their support. Special thanks are due to Dr Adam Barlow, Mr. Qamar Qureshi, Dr. Y.V. Jhala, Dr K. Sankar, Dr. S.P. Goyal, Dr John Seidensticker, Dr. Ullas Karanth, Dr. A.J.T Johnsingh, Dr. Sandeep Sharma, Ms. Grace Gabriel, Dr. Sonam Wangchuk, Mr Peter Puschel, Mr. Hazril Rafhan Abdul Halim, Mr Randeep Singh and Dr. Prajna Paramita Panda for sharing some important references on tiger. Mr P.K. Sen, Dr Jagdish Kiswan, Mr Vivek Menon, Mr Ravi Singh and Dr Sejal Vora and Mr Keshav Varma are duly acknowledged for their comments and suggestions. -
Displacement and Relocation of Protected Areas: a Synthesis and Analysis of Case Studies
SPECIAL ARTICLE Displacement and Relocation of Protected Areas: A Synthesis and Analysis of Case Studies Antoine Lasgorceix, Ashish Kothari Relocation of human populations from the protected elocation of human populations from within areas areas results in a host of socio-economic impacts. In notified for wildlife conservation (protected areas or PA India, in many cases, especially relating to tribal R s) has been undertaken in several countries, as a means of trying to reduce pressures on wildlife. It is not the aim communities that have been relatively isolated from the of this essay to dwell on the ecological and social justifi cation for outside world, the displacement is traumatic from both such relocation. Instead, it attempts to describe and analyse the economic and cultural points of view. This paper full range of relocation cases in India in the last few decades, provides brief case studies of displacement (past, discuss the impacts of these displacements from both environ- mental and livelihood perspectives, and offer recommendations ongoing, or proposed) from protected areas, number of on the way to enhance the process by which relocation decisions villages/families displaced, the place where these are taken and implemented.1 villages/families were relocated to, governance of the 1 Background relocation process, and the kind or nature of relocation (voluntary, induced or forced). It finds that not even a 1.1 PAs and Relocation single study shows the ecological costs and benefits of India’s fi rst modern “protected area” was Hailey National Park relocation, comparing what happens at the old site to created in 1936 by the British colonialists, though there were what happens at the rehabilitation site. -
National Ganga River Basin Authority (Ngrba)
NATIONAL GANGA RIVER BASIN AUTHORITY (NGRBA) Public Disclosure Authorized (Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India) Public Disclosure Authorized Environmental and Social Management Framework (ESMF) Public Disclosure Authorized Volume I - Environmental and Social Analysis March 2011 Prepared by Public Disclosure Authorized The Energy and Resources Institute New Delhi i Table of Contents Executive Summary List of Tables ............................................................................................................... iv Chapter 1 National Ganga River Basin Project ....................................................... 6 1.1 Introduction .................................................................................................. 6 1.2 Ganga Clean up Initiatives ........................................................................... 6 1.3 The Ganga River Basin Project.................................................................... 7 1.4 Project Components ..................................................................................... 8 1.4.1.1 Objective ...................................................................................................... 8 1.4.1.2 Sub Component A: NGRBA Operationalization & Program Management 9 1.4.1.3 Sub component B: Technical Assistance for ULB Service Provider .......... 9 1.4.1.4 Sub-component C: Technical Assistance for Environmental Regulator ... 10 1.4.2.1 Objective ................................................................................................... -
Challenges and Opportunities of Transboundary Rhino Conservation
Challenges and opportunities of transboundary rhino conservation Challenges and opportunities of transboundary rhino conservation in India and Nepal Bibhab Kumar Talukdar1,2* and Satya Priya Sinha3 1Aaranyak and 2International Rhino Foundation C/o 50 Samanwoy Path (Survey), PO Beltola, Guwahati – 781 028, Assam, India; *Corresponding author email: [email protected] 3Wildlife Institute of India, Chandrabani, Dehradun, Uttarkhand – 248 001, India; email: [email protected] Abstract Currently, the wild population of the greater one-horned rhinoceros (Rhinoceros unicornis) is found in India and Nepal. To manage this transboundary population along the Indo-Nepal border, their habitats and numbers need scientific monitoring. Regular data should be collected on their movement patterns and management, and the data shared across borders with concerned conservation and management agencies to monitor the rhino population and the corridors they use, especially in Suklaphanta–Lagga Bagga, Pilibhit Forest Division, Dudhwa, Katerniaghat and Bardia landscape. Rhinos moving around the Indo-Nepal border in Katerniaghat– Bardia and Lagga Bagga–Suklaphanta should be fixed with radio collars to generate vital information that will assist conservation and management of the greater one-horned rhino along the border, strengthen transboundary planning and conservation for the rhino, besides orienting the police and border security forces in both countries to contribute towards protection of this rhino population moving between the countries. Résumé Actuellement, -
Adopt a Heritage Project - List of Adarsh Monuments
Adopt a Heritage Project - List of Adarsh Monuments Monument Mitras are invited under the Adopt a Heritage project for selecting/opting monuments from the below list of Adarsh Monuments under the protection of Archaeological Survey of India. As provided under the Adopta Heritage guidelines, a prospective Monument Mitra needs to opt for monuments under a package. i.e Green monument has to be accompanied with a monument from the Blue or Orange Category. For further details please refer to project guidelines at https://www.adoptaheritage.in/pdf/adopt-a-Heritage-Project-Guidelines.pdf Please put forth your EoI (Expression of Interest) for selected sites, as prescribed in the format available for download on the Adopt a Heritage website: https://adoptaheritage.in/ Sl.No Name of Monument Image Historical Information Category The Veerabhadra temple is in Lepakshi in the Anantapur district of the Indian state of Andhra Virabhadra Temple, Pradesh. Built in the 16th century, the architectural Lepakshi Dist. features of the temple are in the Vijayanagara style 1 Orange Anantpur, Andhra with profusion of carvings and paintings at almost Pradesh every exposed surface of the temple. It is one of the centrally protected monumemts of national importance. 1 | Page Nagarjunakonda is a historical town, now an island located near Nagarjuna Sagar in Guntur district of Nagarjunakonda, 2 the Indian state of Andhra Pradesh, near the state Orange Andhra Pradesh border with Telangana. It is 160 km west of another important historic site Amaravati Stupa. Salihundam, a historically important Buddhist Bhuddist Remains, monument and a major tourist attraction is a village 3 Salihundum, Andhra lying on top of the hill on the south bank of the Orange Pradesh Vamsadhara River. -
National Parks in India (State Wise)
National Parks in India (State Wise) Andaman and Nicobar Islands Rani Jhansi Marine National Park Campbell Bay National Park Galathea National Park Middle Button Island National Park Mount Harriet National Park South Button Island National Park Mahatma Gandhi Marine National Park North Button Island National ParkSaddle Peak National Park Andhra Pradesh Papikonda National Park Sri Venkateswara National Park Arunachal Pradesh Mouling National Park Namdapha National Park Assam Dibru-Saikhowa National Park Orang National Park Manas National Park (UNESCO World Heritage Centre) Nameri National Park Kaziranga National Park (Famous for Indian Rhinoceros, UNESCO World Heritage Centre) Bihar Valmiki National Park Chhattisgarh Kanger Ghati National Park Guru Ghasidas (Sanjay) National Park Indravati National Park Goa Mollem National Park Gujarat Marine National Park, Gulf of Kutch Vansda National Park Blackbuck National Park, Velavadar Gir Forest National Park Haryana WWW.BANKINGSHORTCUTS.COM WWW.FACEBOOK.COM/BANKINGSHORTCUTS 1 National Parks in India (State Wise) Kalesar National Park Sultanpur National Park Himachal Pradesh Inderkilla National Park Khirganga National Park Simbalbara National Park Pin Valley National Park Great Himalayan National Park Jammu and Kashmir Salim Ali National Park Dachigam National Park Hemis National Park Kishtwar National Park Jharkhand Hazaribagh National Park Karnataka Rajiv Gandhi (Rameswaram) National Park Nagarhole National Park Kudremukh National Park Bannerghatta National Park (Bannerghatta Biological Park) -
The Spacing Pattern of Reintroduced Tigers in Human- Dominated Sariska Tiger Reserve
Volume 5 (1): 1-14 (2021) (http://www.wildlife-biodiversity.com/) Research Article The spacing pattern of reintroduced tigers in human- dominated Sariska Tiger Reserve Gobind Sagar Bhardwaj1*, Gogul Selvi2, Saket Agasti2, Balaji Kari3, Hemant Singh4, Anand Kumar5, Rajesh Gupta6, GodillaVishvanatha Reddy7 1 Additional Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Aranya Bhawan, Rajasthan, India, 2 Sariska Tiger Reserve, Alwar, India, 3Deputy Conservator of Forests, Udaipur (North), Rajasthan, India, 4Deputy Conservator of Forests, Jhalawar, Rajasthan, India, 5Assistant Conservator of Forests, Nagour, Rajasthan, India, 6 Principal Officer on Special Duty, CM Office, Rajasthan, India, 7Principal Chief Conservator of Forest (Retired), Rajasthan, India *Email: [email protected] Received: 13 April 2020 / Revised: 09 June 2020 / Accepted: 29June 2020 / Published online: 08 August 2020. Ministry of Sciences, Research, and Technology, Arak University, Iran. How to cite: Bhardwaj, G.S., Selvi, G., Agasti, S., Kari, B., Singh, H., Kumar, A., Gupta, R. & Reddy, G.V. (2021). The spacing pattern of reintroduced tigers in human-dominated Sariska Tiger Reserve, 5(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/ 10.22120/jwb.2020.124591.1129 Abstract This study aimed to estimate the tiger home range size and obtain information on the movement pattern of reintroduced tigers in the human-dominated Sariska Tiger Reserve. The observed extensive home ranges (100% MCP method) of tigresses ST3 (172.75 km²), ST9 (85.25 km²), and ST10 (80.10 km²) can be attributed to low prey base and very high anthropogenic forces. Similarly, the observed small home range of tigresses ST7, ST2, ST14, and ST8 viz. 16.59 km², 19.34 km², 36.58 km², and 43.04 km² respectively is due to high prey abundance in their respective areas. -
State of Conservation of World Heritage Properties
STATE OF CONSERVATION OF WORLD HERITAGE PROPERTIES Name of World Heritage property: Hill Forts of Rajasthan State Party: India Identification number: 247rev Date of Inscription: 2013 Criteria: (ii) (iii) Introduction Within the State of Rajasthan, six extensive and majestic forts together reflect the elaborate, fortified seats of power of Rajput princely states that flourished between the 8th and 18th centuries. The extensive fortifications, up to 20 kilometres in circumference, optimized various kinds of terrain, hilly at Chittuargarh, Kumbhalgarh and Amer, riverside at Gagron, the dense forests at Ranthambore, and the desert at Jaisalmer, exhibit an important phase in the development of an architectural typology based on established “traditional Indian principles of fortifications”. The vocabulary of architectural forms shares much common ground with other greater styles, such as Sultanate and Mughal forts. Rajput style was not ‘unique’, but the particular manner in which Rajput architecture was eclectic (drawing inspiration from antecedents and neighbours) together with its degree of influence over later regional styles (such as Maratha architecture) do make it distinctive. As a former capital of the Sisodia clan and the target of three famous historical sieges, Chittorgarh is strongly associated with Rajput history and folklore. Furthermore the sheer number and variety of architectural remains dating from the 8th to the 16th centuries, mark it as an exceptional fort in its scale and monumentality comparable to very few other Indian forts. Kumbhalgarh was constructed in a single process and (apart from the palace of Fateh Singh, added later) retains its architectural coherence. Its design is attributed to an architect known by name –Mandan – who was also an author and theorist at the court of Rana Kumbha in Chittorgarh.