DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Population Figures, Series-18, Rajasthan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

PAPER 1 OF 1982 CENSUS OF INDIA 1981 SERIES 18 RAJASTHAN fINAL POPULATION FIGU~ES (TOTAL POPULATION, SCHEDULED CASTE POPULATION AND .sCHEDULED TRIBE POPULATION) I. C. SRIVASTAVA ·1)f the Indian Administrative Service Director of Census Operations Rajasthan INTRODUCfION The final figures of total population, scheduled caste and scheduled tribe population of Rajasthan Stat~ are now ready for release at State/District/Town and Tehsil levels. This Primary Census Abs­ tract, as it is called, as against the provisional figures contained in our three publications viz. Paper I, fFacts & Figures' and Supplement to Paper-I has been prepared through manual tabulation by over 1400 census officials including Tabulators, Checkers and Supervisors whose constant and sustained efforts spread over twelve months enabled the Directorate to complete the work as per the schedule prescribed at the national level. As it will take a few months more to publish the final population figures at the viJ1age as well as ward levels in towns in the form of District Census Handbooks, it is hoped, this paper will meet the most essential and immediate demands of various Government departments, autonomous bodies, Cor­ porations, Universities and rtsearch institutions in relation to salient popUlation statistics of the State. In respect of 11 cities with One lac or more population, it has also been possible to present ~the data by municipal wards as shown in Annexure. With compliments from Director of Census Operations, Rajasthan CONTENTS INTRODUCTION (iii) Total Population, Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribt' Population by Districts, 1981 Total Schedu1ed Caste and Scheduled Tribe Population. ( vi) 1. Ganganagar District 1 2. Bikaner District 2 3. ChufU District 3 4. lhunjhunun District 4 5. Alwar District 4 6. Bharatpur District 5 7. Sawai Madhopur District .. 6 8. laipur District 7 9. Sikar District 9 10. Ajmer District 10 11. Tonk District 10 12. Iaisalmer District 11 13. Jodhpur District 11 14. Nagaur District 12 15. Pali District 13 16. Barmer District 13 17. lalor District 14 18. Sirohi District 14 19. Bhilwara District 15- 20. Udaipur District 16 21. Chi ttaurgarh District 17' 22. Dungarpur District 18- 23. Banswara District 19 24. Bundi District 19 Q5. Kota District 2(} 26. Jhalawar District 2t APPENDIX Total ScheduleC: Ca5te and Scheduled Tribe Population of Jaipur U.A. 22 ANNEXURE Total Scheduled Caste end Schecvlco Trite PcrulaticDof Citi~s}a"jrg 23 population 100.000 and above. TOr \L POPULATION, SCHEDULED CASTE AND SCHEOlJlED TRIBE POPULATION BY DISTRICTS, 1981 -------------------------- Scheduled ~cheduled State/District Total Caste Tribe Population Population Population ---- RA.JASTHAN STATE 34,261,862 5,838,879 4,183,124 1. Ganganagar District .. 2,029,968 589,661 5,095 2. Bikaner District 848,749 155,767 1,496 3. Churu District 1,179,466 230,534 5,619 4. Ihunjhunun District .. 1,211,583 180,681 23,077 5. Alwar District 1,771,173 312,389 143,858 6. Bharatpur District 1,884,132 401,225 56,716 7. Sawai Madhopur District 1,535,870 328,147 348,130 8, Ja;pur District 3,420,574 556,190 380,199 9. Sibr District 1,377,245 189,434 36,552 10. Ajmer District 1,440,366 264,801 32,183 11. Tonk: District 783,635 161,685 92,477 12. Jaisalmer District 243,082 35,284 10,680 13. Jodhpur District 1,667,791 258,743 40,088 14. Nagaur District 1,628,669 312,336 2,984 15. Pali District 1,274,504 225,912 69,694 16. Barmer District 1,118,892 174,908 57,038 17. JaIor District 903,073 153,624 72,361 18. Sirohi District 542,049 101,:;81 125,245 19. Bhilwara District 1,310,379 222,842 121,664 20. Udaipur District 2,356,959 193,465 g09,156 21. Chitt'l.UrgJrh District .. 1,232,494 178,380 223,864 22. DUllgarpur District 682,845 30,828 440,026 23. Banswara District 886,600 41,811 643,966 24. Bundi District 586,982 110,977 J 18,030 -25. Kota District 1,559,784 293,421 231,316 26. Jhalawar District 784,998 134,253 91,610 1981 CENSlJS TOTAL, SCHEDULED CASTES AND SCHEDllLED TRIBES POPULATION RAJAS11IAN Sta te/District/Tehsil/UA/City ITown Total Total Scheduled Scheduled Rural Population Castes Tribes Urban (persons) (persons) (Persons) 2 3 4 -----5 RAJASTHAN STATE Total 34,261,862 5,838,879 4,183,124 Rural 27,051,354 4,790.504 4,027,168 Urban 7.210,508 1,048,375 155,956 1. GANGANAGAR DISTRICT Total 2,029,968 589,661 5,095' Rural 1,611,669 504,816 2,633 Urban 418,299 84,~45 2,462. L Karanpur Tehsil T 114,167 47.672 106 R 89,177 39,873 16 U 24,990 7.199 90 Kesrisinghpur (M) U 9,738 3,064 28 Karanpur (M) U 15,252 4.735 62 2. Ganganagar Tehsil T 279,762 73.278 775 R 156,070 50,7[;7 109 U 123,692 22,491 666- Ganganagar (M) U 123,692 22,491 666 3. Padampur Tehsil T 116,580 35,690 174 R 99,273 30,801 94 U 17,307 4,889 80 "'Padampur (M) U 10,734 2,612 51 Gajsinghpur( M) U 6,573 2,277 29 4. Sadulsahar Tehsil T 97,912 30.294 196 R 85,244 27,112 78 U 12,668 3,182 118 *SaduIsahar{M) U 12,668 3,182 11S. 5. Sangaria Tehsil T 95,294 23,689 100 R 76,292 19,875 55 U 19,002 3,814 45 Sangaria (M) U 19,002 3,814 45 6. Tibi Tehsil .. .'" T 95,370 31,334 224 R 95,370 31,334 ~4 U 7. Hanumangarh Tehsil •• .. T 212,369 57,103 766 R 152,298 46,628 249 U 60,071 10,475 517' Hanumangarh (M) U 60,071 lOA75 517 8. Raisinghnagar Tehsil ., T 130,709 49,571 162 R 113,640 44,813 101 U 17,069 4,758 61 Raisinghnagar (M) U 17,069 4.758 6] 2 0} [;\ '(:/ DistrictjTehsiljUAjCityjTown Total Total Scheduled Scheduled Rural Population Castes Tribes Urban (Persons) (Persons) (Persons) 1 2 3 4 5 9. Suratgarh Tehsil T 245,910 69,597 743 R 198,243 59,485 422 U 47,667 10,112 321 Pilibanga (M) U 17,852 4,853 203 Suratgarh (M) U 29,815 5,259 118 10. Nohar Tehsil .. T 266,027 60,869 835 R 217,433 52,296 624 U 48,594 8,573 211 Rawats'lr (M) .. U 25,914 6,574 27 Nohar (M) U 22,680 1,999 184 11. Bhadra Tehsil T 174,869 33,434 424 R 152,301 30,212 365 U 21,568 3,222 59 B'nira (M) .. U 22,568 3,222 59 12. Anupgarh Tehsil T 200,999 77,130 590 R 176,328 71,600 296 U 24,671 5,530 294 Anupgarh (M) U 12,997 2,625 146 Vijainagar (M) U 11,674 2,905 148 BIKANER DISTRICT Total 848,749 155,767 1,496 Rural 513,664 119,129 458 Urban 335,085 36,638 1,038 Bikaner Tehsil T 458,285 73,047 1,152 R 147,319 39,272 150 U 310,966 33,775 1,002 Bikaner U.A. U 2S7,712 29,367 1,002 (a) Bikaner .. U 256,057 25,355 1,001 (i) Bikaner (M) .• U 253,174 25,088 981 (ii) Urban Outgrowth of Bichhwal Village (*) O.G. U 2,883 267 20 (b) Gangashahar (M) U 21,192 1,506 1 (c) Bhinasar (M) U 10,463 2,506 Napasar (CT) U 12,259 2,383 Deshnok (M) U 10,995 2,025 2. Lunkaransar Tehsil T 114,195 23,170 165 R 114,195 23,170 165 U .. 3. Kolayat Tehsil T 94,327 24,623 70 R 94,327 24,623 70 U 4. Nokha Tehsil T 131,942 34,927 109 R 157,823 32,064 73 U 24,119 2,863 36 Nokha (M) T -, :4,119 2,863 36 NOTB-;*Urbanised portion of Bichhwal Village comprising ,)' Lalgarh Palac~, Urmal Dairy, Rep C"lony, RAC Batt llion, Wo()Uen \1ill~ etc., located in Bichhwa1 Village of Bikaner Tehsil. 3 --- StatelDistricl ITehsiljUAjCity/T'own Total Total Scheduled Scheduled Rural Population Castes Tribes Urban (Persons) (persons) (Persons) :! 3 4 5 3. CHURU DISTRICT Total ],179,466 230,534 5,619 Rural 834,807 189,651 3,946 Urban 344,659 40,883 1,673 1. Taranagar Tehsil T 109,315 21,853 449 R 93,880 19,781 426 U 15,435 2,072 23 Taranagar (M) U 15,435 2,072 23 2. Rajgarh Tehsil T 205,722 42,562 2,066 R 175,343 37,522 1,593 if 30,379 :".040 473, Rajgarh (M) U 30,379 5,040 473 3. Sardarshahar Tehsil T 191,440 33,636 ],099 R 135,052 29,798 538 U 56,388 3,838 561 Sardarshahar U. A. .. U 56,388 3,838 561 (i) Sardarshahar (M) U 55,473 3,760 508 (ii) Sardarshahar (O.G.)* U 915 78 53 4. Churu Tehsil .. T ]63,624 27,499 1,017 R 93,916 20,333 760 U 69,708 7,166 257 Churu U.A. U 62,070 6,231 109 (i) Churu (M) .. U 61,811 6,215 109, (ii) Churu (O.G.)t U 259 16 Ratan Nagar (M) U 7,638 935 148 5. Dungargarh Tehsil T 125,051 24,633 150 R 95,975 22,329 45 U 29,076 2,304 105 Dungargarh (M) U 29,076 2,304 105 6.
Recommended publications
  • Characteristics of Pegmatoidal Granite Exposed Near Bayalan, Ajmer District, Rajasthan

    Characteristics of Pegmatoidal Granite Exposed Near Bayalan, Ajmer District, Rajasthan

    Characteristics of pegmatoidal granite exposed near Bayalan, Ajmer district, Rajasthan Nilanjan Dasgupta1,∗, Taritwan Pal2, Joydeep Sen1 and Tamoghno Ghosh1 1Department of Geology, Presidency University, 86/1 College Street, Kolkata 700 073, India. 2Department of Geology and Geophysics, IIT Kharagpur, Midnapore, West Bengal, India. ∗e-mail: [email protected] The study involves the characterization of pegmatoidal granite, southeast of Beawar, Ajmer district, Rajasthan. Earlier researchers had described this granite as part of the BGC, basement to the Bhim Group of the Delhi Super Group rocks. However, the present study indicates that it is younger than the rocks of Bhim Group of South Delhi Fold Belt, into which it is intrusive. The intrusion is structurally controlled and the outcrop pattern is phacolithic. The granite had intruded post-D2 deformation of the Delhi orogeny along the axial planes of D2 folds. The intrusion has also resulted in the formation of a contact aureole about the calc gneisses. 1. Introduction host rocks by this emplacement have been studied. An attempt is made to fix the time of emplacement A long geological history since Middle Archaean with respect to the different deformational events is recorded in the Precambrian belt of Rajasthan. of the Delhi orogeny. The rocks of the study area fall within the The granites were earlier classified as basement ‘Delhi System’, defined in the pioneering study of rocks of pre-Delhi age (Heron 1953; Gupta 1934), Heron (1953), and now rechristened as the Delhi which is contrary to the present findings. Supergroup (Gupta and Bose 2000 and references therein) (figure 1). Within the study area around the small village of Bayalan, 10 km southeast of Beawar in Ajmer district of Rajasthan, pegma- 2.

  • Banswara District

    Banswara District Hydrogeological Atlas of Rajasthan Banswara District Contents: List of Plates Title Page No. Plate I Administrative Map 2 Plate II Topography 4 Plate III Rainfall Distribution 4 Plate IV Geological Map 6 Plate V Geomorphological Map 6 Plate VI Aquifer Map 8 Plate VII Stage of Ground Water Development (Block wise) 2011 8 Location of Exploratory and Ground Water Monitoring Plate VIII 10 Stations Depth to Water Level Plate IX 10 (Pre-Monsoon 2010) Water Table Elevation Plate X 12 (Pre-Monsoon 2010) Water Level Fluctuation Plate XI 12 (Pre-Post Monsoon 2010) Electrical Conductivity Distribution Plate XII 14 (Average Pre-Monsoon 2005-09) Chloride Distribution Plate XIII 14 (Average Pre-Monsoon 2005-09) Fluoride Distribution Plate XIV 16 (Average Pre-Monsoon 2005-09) Nitrate Distribution Plate XV 16 (Average Pre-Monsoon 2005-09) Plate XVI Depth to Bedrock 18 Plate XVII Map of Unconfined Aquifer 18 Glossary of terms 19 2013 ADMINISTRATIVE SETUP DISTRICT – BANSWARA Location: Banswara district is located in the extreme southern part of Rajasthan. It is bounded in the North by Dungarpur and Pratapgarh districts, in the west by Dungarpur district, in the East by state of Madhya Pradesh and South by state of Gujarat and. It stretches between 23⁰03' 22.98” to 23⁰ 55' 31.36” north latitude and 73⁰ 57' 12.92’’ to 74⁰ 46' 22.15’’ east longitude covering area of 4,493 sq km. Major part of the district has a systematic drainage system, as whole region is the part of ‘Mahi River Basin’. Administrative Set-up: Banswara district is administratively divided into ten Blocks.
  • Tax Payers of Dungarpur District Having Turnover Upto 1.5 Crore

    Tax Payers of Dungarpur District Having Turnover Upto 1.5 Crore

    Tax Payers of Dungarpur District having Turnover upto 1.5 Crore Administrative S.No GSTN_ID TRADE NAME ADDRESS Control 1 CENTRE 08ALFPJ1052M1Z3 MAHAVEER AGENCY SAGWARA, DUNGARPUR, SAGWARA, DUNGARPUR, DUNGARPUR, 2 STATE 08AGQPJ2319D1ZI RIGAL INDUSTRIES H-38, DUNGARPUR, DUNGARPUR, DUNGARPUR, 314001 3 STATE 08AJDPC5360P1ZZ DARBAR CONSTRUCTION VPO- RAMA, TEH- ASPUR, DUNGARPUR, DUNGARPUR, DUNGARPUR, 4 STATE 08CPZPS3894G1ZR SOLANKI CEMENT SUPPLIERS BANSWARA ROAD, ASPUR, DUNGARPUR, DUNGARPUR, DUNGARPUR, 314021 5 STATE 08ARRPG7914R1ZT DARPAN AGENCEY KANSARA CHOWK DAMWADA KANSARA CHOWK SAGWASRA DT. DUNGARPUR, DUNGARPUR, DUNGARPUR, DUNGARPUR, 6 STATE 08APKPK7438R1ZX DINESH KUMAR & BROTHER`S VILL- BICHIWARA, TEH- BICHIWARA, DUNGARPUR, BICHIWARA, DUNGARPUR, DUNGARPUR, 7 STATE 08ABWFS3185M1Z5 SATKAR STORES INDIRA COLONY, SAGWARA, DUNGARPUR, DUNGARPUR, 314001 8 STATE 08ADTPJ4182E1ZA ASHISH AUTOMOBILES PETROL PUMP ARIYA, SAGWARA, DUGARPUR, DUNGARPUR, DUNGARPUR, 9 STATE 08CDVPP6851L1ZH PRAJAPATI BUILDING MATERIAL VPO-GARIYATA, TEH-GALIYAKOT, DUNGARPUR, DUNGARPUR, DUNGARPUR, 314035 10 STATE 08ALAPP3671R1ZF HARI SHANKER PATEL DUNGARPUR, DUNGARPUR, 11 CENTRE 08AALFB9815H1Z5 BLACKSTONE INDUSTRIES N.H. -8, SHISHOD INDUSTRIAL AREA, VPO- SHISHOD, DUNGARPUR, DUNGARPUR, DUNGARPUR, 314001 12 STATE 08AADFT2279B1ZB THOMAS AND COMPANY DUNGARPUR, DUNGARPUR, DUNGARPUR, DUNGARPUR, 13 STATE 08ABDPJ5335K1ZK PARAS HOSIERY WORKS 5- SANMATI COMPLEX, DUNGARPUR, DUNGARPUR, DUNGARPUR, 14 STATE 08BBYPJ4171M1ZU VIJAY MERCHANT GANATAWARA SAGWARA, DUNGARPUR, DUNGARPUR, 15 STATE
  • Pre–Feasibility Report

    Pre–Feasibility Report

    PRE–FEASIBILITY REPORT Development of 8 lanes (Greenfield Highway) from Itawa (Ch. 284.000) to after Chambal River Banda Hera (Ch. 392.800) Section of NH-148 N (Total length 108.800 Km), Under BHARATMALA PRIYOJANA Lot-4/Pkg-4 in the state of Rajasthan June 2019 DISCLAIMER This report has been prepared by DPR Consultant on behalf of NHAI for the internal purpose and use of the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MOEF&CC), Government of India. This document has been prepared based on public domain sources, secondary and primary research. The purpose of this report is to obtain Term of Reference (ToR) for Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) study for Environmental Clearance to develop the Economic Corridors and Feeder Routes to improve the efficiency of freight movement in India under Bharatmala Pariyojana, Section of Lot 4/Pkg 4: Firozpur Jhirka – Kota section. It is, however, to be noted that this report has been prepared in best faith, with assumptions and estimates considered to be appropriate and reasonable but cannot be guaranteed. There might be inadvertent omissions/errors/aberrations owing to situations and conditions out of the control of NHAI and DPR Consultant. Further, the report has been prepared on a best-effort basis, based on inputs considered appropriate as of the mentioned date of the report. Neither this document nor any of its contents can be used for any purpose other than stated above, without the prior written consent from NHAI. Feasibility Report Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................ 1 2. Introduction to the project ..................................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Project Proponent ................................................................................................................................
  • District Census Handbook, Bikaner, Rajasthan

    District Census Handbook, Bikaner, Rajasthan

    CENSUS OF INDIA 1961 RAJASTHAN DISTRICT CENSUS HANDBOOK BIKANER DISTRICT C. S. GUPTA OF THE INDlAN ADMINlS'l'RATlVE: SERVICE Superintendent of Census Operations, Rajasthan Printed by Mafatlal Z. Gandhi. at Nayan Printing Preis. Ahmedabad-I. FOREWORD The Census data has always been considered as indispensable for day to day administration. ] t is increasingly being considered now as the foundation stone or' all regional planning. The publication of this series of District Census Handbooks wherein census statistics is made available for smaller territorial units is. therefore~ a significant occasion for it fills many existing gaps in statistics at the lower levels. Many interesting details have been revealed by the Census 1961 and I hope persons engaged in the administration of the State and public in general will appreciate the value and the effort that has gone into the production of such a standard book of reference. 1 congratulate the Superintendent of Census Operations, Rajasthan, Shri C. S. Gupta I. A. S. and his colleagues who have done a good job with skill and perseverence. B. MEHTA JAIPUR, Chief Secretary 1st March, 1966. to the Government of Rajasthan. iii PREFACE The District Census Handbooks, to which series the present volume belongs. are the gifts of the Census of India and were first introduced in 1951. The 1961 series of District Census Handbooks are more elaborate than their counter-part in 1951 and present all important cen,slls data alon~with such other basic information as is very relevant for an understanding of the district. A wide variety of information which the Census 1961 collected: has already been released in several parts as mentioned elsewhere in this book.
  • Economics of Milk Production in Alwar District (Rajasthan): a Comparative Analysis

    Economics of Milk Production in Alwar District (Rajasthan): a Comparative Analysis

    International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 2, Issue 8, August 2012 1 ISSN 2250-3153 Economics of Milk Production in Alwar District (Rajasthan): A Comparative Analysis G. L. Meena* and D. K. Jain** * Department of Agricultural Economics and Management, MPUAT, Udaipur (Rajasthan) ** Division of Dairy Economics, Statistics and Management, NDRI, Karnal (Haryana) Abstract- This study covered 75 cooperative member milk 1. To compare the cost and return of milk production producers and 75 non-member milk producers which were post- among different herd size categories of households stratified into small, medium and large herd size categories. Per across member and non-member in different seasons. day net maintenance cost was found to be higher for member 2. To compare the production, consumption and marketed group than that of non-member group. It was found to be higher surplus of milk among different herd size categories of in case of buffalo than that of cow and also observed more in the households across member and non-member in different summer season. Per litre cost of buffalo and cow milk production seasons. was observed to be higher for the non-member as compared to member group. Per litre cost of buffalo milk production decreased with increase in herd size categories across different II. REVIEW OF LITERATURE seasons while same trend was not observed in case of cow milk Attempts have been made to review briefly the specific and production. Further, it was found higher in summer season. Daily relevant literature, which has direct or indirect bearing on the net return was found relatively higher in member group as objectives of the present study.
  • Brief Industrial Profile of Hanumangarh District

    Brief Industrial Profile of Hanumangarh District

    lR;eso t;rs lR;eso t;rs Brief Industrial Profile of Hanumangarh District Carried out by MSME-Development Institute (Ministry of MSME, Govt. of India,) Phone : 0141-2213099 ,2212098,2215847 Fax: 0141-2210533 e-mail: [email protected] Web : www.msmedijaipur.gov.in Contents S. No. Topic Page No. 1. General Characteristics of the District 4 1.1 Location & Geographical Area 5 1.2 Topography 5 1.3 Availability of Minerals. 5-6 1.4 Forest 6 1.5 Administrative set up 7 2. District at a glance 7-11 2.1 Existing Status of Industrial Area in the District -------- 11 3. Industrial Scenario Of --------- 11 3.1 Industry at a Glance 12 3.2 Year Wise Trend Of Units Registered 12 3.3 Details Of Existing Micro & Small Enterprises & Artisan Units In 13 The District 3.4 Large Scale Industries / Public Sector undertakings 13 3.5 Major Exportable Item 13 3.6 Growth Trend 14 3.7 Vendorisation / Ancillarisation of the Industry 14 3.8 Medium Scale Enterprises 14 3.8.1 List of the units in ------ & near by Area 14 3.8.2 Major Exportable Item 14 3.9 Service Enterprises 14 3.9.1 Potentials areas for service industry 14 3.10 Potential for new MSMEs 14-15 4. Existing Clusters of Micro & Small Enterprise 15 4.1 Detail Of Major Clusters 15 4.1.1 Manufacturing Sector 15 4.1.2 Service Sector 15 4.2 Details of Identified cluster 16 4.2.1 Leather Footwear 16 4.2.2 Plats of Paris 17 5.
  • Evaluating Pearl Millet Varieties with Farmers in Barmer District

    Evaluating Pearl Millet Varieties with Farmers in Barmer District

    \ EVALUATING PEARL MILLET VARIETIES WITH FARMERS IN BARMER DISTRICT M.K. Choudhary, E. Weltzien R., and M.M. Sharma ABSTRACT A newly formed NGO, operating in Barmer district in western Rajasthan, applied and modified methods of farmerparticipatory variety evaluation develop by ICRISA Tscientists in otheri'egions of Rajasthan. Barmer district has the largest area under pearl millet of all the Indian districts; it is characterized by low and erratic annual rainfall. The first year results of varietal evaluations with farmers indicated that farmers from Barmer district assigned the two highest ranks to varieties with medium to late maturity, large panicles andhigh yieldpotential. The farmers from the more sandy, drierareas of Barmerdistrict didprefer higher tillering, earliermaturir~yvarieties, commonly with larger grain size as a secondary group of desirable materials. The traits used to compare varieties most often were also the characteristics of the most preferred varieties. Farmers insisted on at least one more year of such evaluations before a decision on initial adoption of any of these varieties could be taken. INTRODUCTION The Society to Uplift Rural Economy (SURE) has recently begun to manage and direct a Krishi Vigyan Kendra (KVK), a farmer training center, with the approval of Ihe Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR). In collaboration with ICRISAT, the KVK has started a program to identify cultivars of pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.] suitable for cultivation in Barmer district. Barmer district has no previous research results on the adaptation of newly released varieties of pearl millet.' The current program was designed to evaluate a broad range of genetic diversity on the KVK-farm and on farmers' fields.
  • Circle District Location Acc Code Name of ACC ACC Address

    Circle District Location Acc Code Name of ACC ACC Address

    Sheet1 DISTRICT BRANCH_CD LOCATION CITYNAME ACC_ID ACC_NAME ADDRESS PHONE EMAIL Ajmer RJ-AJM AJMER Ajmer I rj3091004 RAJESH KUMAR SHARMA 5849/22 LAKHAN KOTHARI CHOTI OSWAL SCHOOL KE SAMNE AJMER RA9252617951 [email protected] Ajmer RJ-AJM AJMER Ajmer I rj3047504 RAKESH KUMAR NABERA 5-K-14, JANTA COLONY VAISHALI NAGAR, AJMER, RAJASTHAN. 305001 9828170836 [email protected] Ajmer RJ-AJM AJMER Ajmer I rj3043504 SURENDRA KUMAR PIPARA B-40, PIPARA SADAN, MAKARWALI ROAD,NEAR VINAYAK COMPLEX PAN9828171299 [email protected] Ajmer RJ-AJM AJMER Ajmer I rj3002204 ANIL BHARDWAJ BEHIND BHAGWAN MEDICAL STORE, POLICE LINE, AJMER 305007 9414008699 [email protected] Ajmer RJ-AJM AJMER Ajmer I rj3021204 DINESH CHAND BHAGCHANDANI N-14, SAGAR VIHAR COLONY VAISHALI NAGAR,AJMER, RAJASTHAN 30 9414669340 [email protected] Ajmer RJ-AJM AJMER Ajmer I rj3142004 DINESH KUMAR PUROHIT KALYAN KUNJ SURYA NAGAR DHOLA BHATA AJMER RAJASTHAN 30500 9413820223 [email protected] Ajmer RJ-AJM AJMER Ajmer I rj3201104 MANISH GOYAL 2201 SUNDER NAGAR REGIONAL COLLEGE KE SAMMANE KOTRA AJME 9414746796 [email protected] Ajmer RJ-AJM AJMER Ajmer I rj3002404 VIKAS TRIPATHI 46-B, PREM NAGAR, FOY SAGAR ROAD, AJMER 305001 9414314295 [email protected] Ajmer RJ-AJM AJMER Ajmer I rj3204804 DINESH KUMAR TIWARI KALYAN KUNJ SURYA NAGAR DHOLA BHATA AJMER RAJASTHAN 30500 9460478247 [email protected] Ajmer RJ-AJM AJMER Ajmer I rj3051004 JAI KISHAN JADWANI 361, SINDHI TOPDADA, AJMER TH-AJMER, DIST- AJMER RAJASTHAN 305 9413948647 [email protected]
  • A CASE STUDY of SIKAR, RAJASTHAN Manisha

    A CASE STUDY of SIKAR, RAJASTHAN Manisha

    Journal of Global Resources Volume 4 (01) January 2018 Page 133-137 ISSN: 2395-3160 (Print), 2455-2445 (Online) 20 STRATEGIC PLANS FOR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AND ITS POTENTIAL: A CASE STUDY OF SIKAR, RAJASTHAN Manisha Sharma 1and M. A. Khan 2 1 Head, Dept. of Geography. B.D. Todi College, Lachhmangarh (Sikar), India 2Deputy Director, Department of Minority Affairs, GoR, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India Abstract: Industrial Potential means anything that may be a possibility; potentially and existing in possibility, not in actuality and being potent. Industrial or economic potential is determined by the quantity of labor resources and the quality of their vocational training by the volume of production capacities of Industrial and construction organizations, by the production capacities of agriculture, by the extent of transportation arteries, by the development of sectors in the non-production sphere by advances in science and technology and by the resources of explored mineral deposits. Resources have the most vital role in the development of a region. The main resources of study area which have great significance for industrial development are minerals, agriculture and livestock. Water and electricity provides basis for Industrial development. However, the area has good potential for agro based, mineral based and livestock based industries. As Sikar enjoys the benefits of surplus agricultural production and large number of livestock, it would be worthwhile to propose few agro based and livestock industrial units. Limestone is also being exploited so, there is scope of cement and others industries. This paper describes a strategic plan for development of Industries and its potential in Sikar district.
  • THEIR OWN COUNTRY :A Profile of Labour Migration from Rajasthan

    THEIR OWN COUNTRY :A Profile of Labour Migration from Rajasthan

    THEIR OWN COUNTRY A PROFILE OF LABOUR MIGRATION FROM RAJASTHAN This report is a collaborative effort of 10 civil society organisations of Rajasthan who are committed to solving the challenges facing the state's seasonal migrant workers through providing them services and advocating for their rights. This work is financially supported by the Tata Trust migratnt support programme of the Sir Dorabji Tata Trust and Allied Trusts. Review and comments Photography Jyoti Patil Design and Graphics Mihika Mirchandani All communication concerning this publication may be addressed to Amrita Sharma Program Coordinator Centre for Migration and Labour Solutions, Aajeevika Bureau 2, Paneri Upvan, Street no. 3, Bedla road Udaipur 313004, Ph no. 0294 2454092 [email protected], [email protected] Website: www.aajeevika.org This document has been prepared with a generous financial support from Sir Dorabji Tata Trust and Allied Trusts In Appreciation and Hope It is with pride and pleasure that I dedicate this report to the immensely important, yet un-served, task of providing fair treatment, protection and opportunity to migrant workers from the state of Rajasthan. The entrepreneurial might of Rajasthani origin is celebrated everywhere. However, much less thought and attention is given to the state's largest current day “export” - its vast human capital that makes the economy move in India's urban, industrial and agrarian spaces. The purpose of this report is to bring back into focus the need to value this human capital through services, policies and regulation rather than leaving its drift to the imperfect devices of market forces. Policies for labour welfare in Rajasthan and indeed everywhere else in our country are wedged delicately between equity obligations and the imperatives of a globalised market place.
  • Sharma, V. & Sankhala, K. 1984. Vanishing Cats of Rajasthan. J in Jackson, P

    Sharma, V. & Sankhala, K. 1984. Vanishing Cats of Rajasthan. J in Jackson, P

    Sharma, V. & Sankhala, K. 1984. Vanishing Cats of Rajasthan. J In Jackson, P. (Ed). Proceedings from the Cat Specialist Group meeting in Kanha National Park. p. 116-135. Keywords: 4Asia/4IN/Acinonyx jubatus/caracal/Caracal caracal/cats/cheetah/desert cat/ distribution/felidae/felids/Felis chaus/Felis silvestris ornata/fishing cat/habitat/jungle cat/ lesser cats/observation/Prionailurus viverrinus/Rajasthan/reintroduction/status 22 117 VANISHING CATS OF RAJASTHAN Vishnu Sharma Conservator of Forests Wildlife, Rajasthan Kailash Sankhala Ex-Chief Wildlife Warden, Rajasthan Summary The present study of the ecological status of the lesser cats of Rajasthan is a rapid survey. It gives broad indications of the position of fishing cats, caracals, desert cats and jungle cats. Less than ten fishing cats have been reported from Bharatpur. This is the only locality where fishing cats have been seen. Caracals are known to occur locally in Sariska in Alwar, Ranthambore in Sawaimadhopur, Pali and Doongargarh in Bikaner district. Their number is estimated to be less than fifty. Desert cats are thinly distributed over entire desert range receiving less than 60 cm rainfall. Their number may not be more than 500. Jungle cats are still found all over the State except in extremely arid zone receiving less than 20 cms of rainfall. An intelligent estimate places their population around 2000. The study reveals that the Indian hunting cheetah did not exist in Rajasthan even during the last century when ecological conditions were more favourable than they are even today in Africa. The cats are important in the ecological chain specially in controlling the population of rodent pests.