Uranium Deposits at Shinarump Mesa and Some Adjacent Areas in the Temple Mountain District, Emery County, Utah
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Uranium Deposits at Shinarump Mesa and Some Adjacent Areas in the Temple Mountain District, Emery County, Utah By DonaUJG. Wyant Trace Elements Investigations Report 51 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY RESTRICTED IN REPLY REFER TO: SECURITY INFORMATION UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY,,^ material contains information WASHINGTON 25. D.C. affecting the national defense of , the United States within the mean- JAN21 1953 ing of the espionage laws, Title 18, UoSoCo, Sees, 793 and 794,.the . transmission or revelation of which AEG - .709/3 .in any manner to an unauthorized . person is prohibited by Iaw0 Dr, Phillip L, Merritt, Assistant Director Division of Raw Materials Uo S c Atomic Energy Commission Po Oo Box 30y Ansonia Station New York 23, New York Dear Phil: Transmitted herewith are six copies of Trace Elements Investi gations Report 51 3 "Uranium deposits at. Shinarump Mesa and some adjacent areas in the Temple Mountain district, Emery County, Utah," by Donald Gc Wyant, January 1953° The investigation upon which this report is based was conducted in 1947» The report has been delayed due to the pressure of other work, but is being transmitted at this time for its possible value in future studies that might be undertaken in the area. As a result of the 1947 work, 950 tons of asphaltite- and carnptite'-bearirig sandstone are estimated to contain from 0.01 to 0.2 per- cent11 uranium^of which"about half ;may contain from 0,1 to 0 0 2 percent, and 90 tons are estimated to contain 0.005 to 08 01 percent uranium. An addi tional 1,000 tons of potential ore containing more than 0.01 percent uranium may also be present,, However, inasmuch as the main purpose of the 1947 sampling program was to determine the general uranium content of all of the Shinarump conglomerate at Shinarump Mesa and not to determine re serves of minable ore, individual ore bodies were not sampled completely. The Survey plans no additional investigation of the Temple Mountain district at this time. We plan to publish Part I of this report as a Geological Survey bulletin, and are asking Mr. Hosted to approve this plan,, Sincerely yours, W. H O Bradley Chief Geologist RESTRICTED SECURITY INFORMATION >><-;1^ -~ / - \ C( '- f \ / SECURITY INFORMATION Geqlogy - Mineralogy This document consists of 98 pages, plus 3 figures. Series A UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OP THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURYEY URANIUM DEPOSITS AT SHINARUMP MESA MD SOME ADJACENT AREAS IN TH1 TEMPLE MOUNTAIN DISTRICT, EMERY COUWY, UTAH* Donald G* Wyant January 1953 Trace Elements Investigations This preliminary report is dis tributed without editorial and technical review for conformity the United States within the mean- with official standards and no menclature. It is not for pub- 18, U.S.O., Sees. 793 and ?9^9 the lie inspection or quotation* transmission or revelation of iz©d person is prohibited "by law, *This report .concerns work done on "behalf of the Division of Raw Materials of the U. .S. Atomic Energy Commission When separated from Part II, handle Part I as ^CLASSIFIED RESTRICTED SECURITY INFORMATION Eeport 51 No. of copies Amerieaa Cyanamid Company, Winchester. ............ 1 Argonne National laboratory ................. 1 Atomic Energy Commission, Washington ............. 2 Battell© Memorial Institute, Columbus ............ 1 Carbide and Carbon Chemicals Company, Y-12 Area ....... 1 Division of Raw Materials, Grants .............. 1 Division of Raw Materials, Denver .............. 1 Division of Raw Materials, Hot Springs ............ 1 Division of Raw Materials, Hew Tork .............. 6 Division of Raw Materials, Salt Lake City .......... 1 Division of Raw Materials, Richfield ............. 1 Division of Raw Materials, Butt© ............... 1 Division of Raw Materials, Washington ............ 8 Dow Chemical, Company, Pittsburg ............... 1 Exploration Division, Grand Junction Operations Office .... 6 Grand Junction Operations Office ............... 1 Technical Information Service,, Oak Ridge ........... 6 Tennessee Valley Authority,, Wilson Dam ............ 1 U. S. Mineral Deposits Branch, Washington ............. 2 Geochemistry and Petrology Branch, Washington ........ 1 Geophysics Branoh9 Washington ................ 1 Alaskan Geology Branch;, Washington .............. 1 Fuels Branch,, Washington ................... 1 L. R. Page, Denver ..«...*...«........... 2 R. P. Fiseher e Grand Junction ................ 1 A. So Weissenborn, Spokane .................. 1 J. P. Smith, Jr., DenT©r ................... 1 N. M. Denson9 Denver ..................... 1 R. W. Swanson, Spokane .................... 1 Lo S. Gardner,, Albuquerque .................. 1 A. H. Koschmann9 Denver ................... 1 E. He Bailey, San Prancisc© ................. 1 C. E. Dutton,, ffedison .................... 1 R. A. Laurence 9 Knoxville .................. 1 R. J. R©"berts 9 Salt Lake City ................ 1 J. D. .Love, Lammie ..................... 1 TEPC0 9 Washington ...................... 5 "66" 3 CONTENTS 5 oeo»»oft«o«oooo6».»»o.»e»« O fOrJK .»aoooo0ooo»o«oo«o«<»aaa O Present work. .»« » » ........... 9 Acknowledgment© .. .. .«... e ..». e o«e« 10 Chert-pebble conglomerate unit ............. 19 Sandstone-mudstone unit. ................ 21 "Xdme-s-pellet conglomerate unit. ............. 23 Upper white sandstone unit .......* .....;. 25 Radioactivity and sampling . «, . , . 0 . » . 26 Uranium ©r© deposits .. ..*............ ^1 ««.*.*. Ore "bodies at Shinanamp Mesa. ......... e 0 0 .. 50 Ore "bodies in the chert-pebble conglomerate unit . » . 51 Ore "bodies in the sandst©ne-=mudston© unit. *,»»».. 52 Ore bodies in the lime~pellet conglomerate unit. .... 56 Ore "bodies at the South Temple workings ........... 58 Ore "bodies at the North Tempi© workings ........... 65 Other deposits. ....................... 65 ore minerals and mineraloids. ............... 67 Origin of the deposits ...................... 73 Outlook and suggestions for prospectinge ............. 86 Summary and conclusions. ..................... 88 Bibliography ........................... 90 Figure 1. Index map of Temple Mountain distriet 9 2mery County, e e 2. General seotion of roek formations in the San Hafael Swell, Utah. ..................... 12 3o G-eologi© section and map of the surface of Shinarump Mesa, Emery County, TTtah ...............In envelope ty. Sketch sections surrounding Shinarump Mesa, Emery County, Utah .....................In envelope 4 ILLUSTEA.TXOUS (Continued) Figore 5» Maps and sections of the South Temple workings,, Temple Mountain district,, Emery County, Utah . N. In envelope 6 to 16. .Columnar sections SH-1 to SH-11, inclusive, Shinarurap Mesa, Emery County, Utah . «,,.... 28-38 Ta"ble 1, Analyses of channel samples p Shinarump Mesa9 Tempi© Mountain di strict 9 Emery County , Utah ........ 39 2, Analyses of bituminous sandstone and conglomerate, Temple Mountain district ,, Utah ........... 49 3. Analyses of samples, Through adit, South Temple workings. .... .<>. ......... ., , Eadiometric and chemical analyses of selected samples, Temple Mountain districts Emery County, Utah. a . ?2 URANIUM DEPOSITS AT SHINARUMP MESA AID SOME ADJACENT AREAS IN THE TEMPLE MOUNTAIN DISTRICT, EMERT COUNTY, UTAH By Donald G. Wyant ABSTRACT Deposits of uraniferous hydrocarbons are associated with carnotite in the Shinarump conglomerate of Trias sic age at Shinarump Mesa and ad jacent areas of the Temple Mountain district in th© San Rafael Swell of Emery County9 Utah. .The irregular ore todies of carnotite-tearing sand stone are genetically related to lenticular uraniferous ore "bodies con taining disseminated asphaltitie and humic hydrocarbon in permeable sand stones and were localized indirectly "by sedimentary controls. .Nearly non-uraniferous "bitumen commonly permeates the sandstones in the Shinarump conglomerate and the underlying Moenkopi formation in the area. The ore deposits at Temple Mountain have teen altered locally "by hydrothermal solutions, and in other deposits throughout the area carnotite has "been transported "by ground and surface water. Uraniferous asphaltite is thought to "be the non-volatile, residue of an original weakly uraniferous crude oil that migrated into the San Rafael anticline; the ore metals concentrated in the asphaltite as the oil was devolatilizad and polymerized. Carnotite is thought to have formed from the asphaltite "by ground water leaching. It is concluded that additional study of the genesis of the asphalt it ic uranium ores in the San Rafael Swell, of the processes "by which the hydrocarbons interact and are modified (such as heat, poly merization, and hydrogenation -under the influence of alpha-ray "bombard ment), of petroleum source "beds, and of volcanic intrusive rocks of Tertiary age are of fundamental importance in the continuing study of the uranium deposits on the Colorado Plateau. INTRODUCTION The asphaltic ores of uranium and vanadium in the Temple Mountain district, Emery County, Utah have long "been of interest to geologists and, occasionally, to miners. The ore can now "be treated successfully com mercially and the importance of the district will probably increase with additional prospecting and the further increase and application of factual geologic data. Prom these data, interpretation may lead to additional discoveries of ore in the San Rafael Swellj and would prob ably aid in the "better understanding of the genesis of other uranium deposits elsewhere in the Colorado Plateau. The Temple Mountain district (fig. l) is within