Uranium Deposits at Shinarump Mesa and Some Adjacent Areas in the Temple Mountain District, Emery County, Utah

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Uranium Deposits at Shinarump Mesa and Some Adjacent Areas in the Temple Mountain District, Emery County, Utah Uranium Deposits at Shinarump Mesa and Some Adjacent Areas in the Temple Mountain District, Emery County, Utah By DonaUJG. Wyant Trace Elements Investigations Report 51 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY RESTRICTED IN REPLY REFER TO: SECURITY INFORMATION UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY,,^ material contains information WASHINGTON 25. D.C. affecting the national defense of , the United States within the mean- JAN21 1953 ing of the espionage laws, Title 18, UoSoCo, Sees, 793 and 794,.the . transmission or revelation of which AEG - .709/3 .in any manner to an unauthorized . person is prohibited by Iaw0 Dr, Phillip L, Merritt, Assistant Director Division of Raw Materials Uo S c Atomic Energy Commission Po Oo Box 30y Ansonia Station New York 23, New York Dear Phil: Transmitted herewith are six copies of Trace Elements Investi­ gations Report 51 3 "Uranium deposits at. Shinarump Mesa and some adjacent areas in the Temple Mountain district, Emery County, Utah," by Donald Gc Wyant, January 1953° The investigation upon which this report is based was conducted in 1947» The report has been delayed due to the pressure of other work, but is being transmitted at this time for its possible value in future studies that might be undertaken in the area. As a result of the 1947 work, 950 tons of asphaltite- and carnptite'-bearirig sandstone are estimated to contain from 0.01 to 0.2 per- cent11 uranium^of which"about half ;may contain from 0,1 to 0 0 2 percent, and 90 tons are estimated to contain 0.005 to 08 01 percent uranium. An addi­ tional 1,000 tons of potential ore containing more than 0.01 percent uranium may also be present,, However, inasmuch as the main purpose of the 1947 sampling program was to determine the general uranium content of all of the Shinarump conglomerate at Shinarump Mesa and not to determine re­ serves of minable ore, individual ore bodies were not sampled completely. The Survey plans no additional investigation of the Temple Mountain district at this time. We plan to publish Part I of this report as a Geological Survey bulletin, and are asking Mr. Hosted to approve this plan,, Sincerely yours, W. H O Bradley Chief Geologist RESTRICTED SECURITY INFORMATION >><-;1^ -~ / - \ C( '- f \ / SECURITY INFORMATION Geqlogy - Mineralogy This document consists of 98 pages, plus 3 figures. Series A UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OP THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURYEY URANIUM DEPOSITS AT SHINARUMP MESA MD SOME ADJACENT AREAS IN TH1 TEMPLE MOUNTAIN DISTRICT, EMERY COUWY, UTAH* Donald G* Wyant January 1953 Trace Elements Investigations This preliminary report is dis­ tributed without editorial and technical review for conformity the United States within the mean- with official standards and no­ menclature. It is not for pub- 18, U.S.O., Sees. 793 and ?9^9 the lie inspection or quotation* transmission or revelation of iz©d person is prohibited "by law, *This report .concerns work done on "behalf of the Division of Raw Materials of the U. .S. Atomic Energy Commission When separated from Part II, handle Part I as ^CLASSIFIED RESTRICTED SECURITY INFORMATION Eeport 51 No. of copies Amerieaa Cyanamid Company, Winchester. ............ 1 Argonne National laboratory ................. 1 Atomic Energy Commission, Washington ............. 2 Battell© Memorial Institute, Columbus ............ 1 Carbide and Carbon Chemicals Company, Y-12 Area ....... 1 Division of Raw Materials, Grants .............. 1 Division of Raw Materials, Denver .............. 1 Division of Raw Materials, Hot Springs ............ 1 Division of Raw Materials, Hew Tork .............. 6 Division of Raw Materials, Salt Lake City .......... 1 Division of Raw Materials, Richfield ............. 1 Division of Raw Materials, Butt© ............... 1 Division of Raw Materials, Washington ............ 8 Dow Chemical, Company, Pittsburg ............... 1 Exploration Division, Grand Junction Operations Office .... 6 Grand Junction Operations Office ............... 1 Technical Information Service,, Oak Ridge ........... 6 Tennessee Valley Authority,, Wilson Dam ............ 1 U. S. Mineral Deposits Branch, Washington ............. 2 Geochemistry and Petrology Branch, Washington ........ 1 Geophysics Branoh9 Washington ................ 1 Alaskan Geology Branch;, Washington .............. 1 Fuels Branch,, Washington ................... 1 L. R. Page, Denver ..«...*...«........... 2 R. P. Fiseher e Grand Junction ................ 1 A. So Weissenborn, Spokane .................. 1 J. P. Smith, Jr., DenT©r ................... 1 N. M. Denson9 Denver ..................... 1 R. W. Swanson, Spokane .................... 1 Lo S. Gardner,, Albuquerque .................. 1 A. H. Koschmann9 Denver ................... 1 E. He Bailey, San Prancisc© ................. 1 C. E. Dutton,, ffedison .................... 1 R. A. Laurence 9 Knoxville .................. 1 R. J. R©"berts 9 Salt Lake City ................ 1 J. D. .Love, Lammie ..................... 1 TEPC0 9 Washington ...................... 5 "66" 3 CONTENTS 5 oeo»»oft«o«oooo6».»»o.»e»« O fOrJK .»aoooo0ooo»o«oo«o«<»aaa O Present work. .»« » » ........... 9 Acknowledgment© .. .. .«... e ..». e o«e« 10 Chert-pebble conglomerate unit ............. 19 Sandstone-mudstone unit. ................ 21 "Xdme-s-pellet conglomerate unit. ............. 23 Upper white sandstone unit .......* .....;. 25 Radioactivity and sampling . «, . , . 0 . » . 26 Uranium ©r© deposits .. ..*............ ^1 ««.*.*. Ore "bodies at Shinanamp Mesa. ......... e 0 0 .. 50 Ore "bodies in the chert-pebble conglomerate unit . » . 51 Ore "bodies in the sandst©ne-=mudston© unit. *,»»».. 52 Ore bodies in the lime~pellet conglomerate unit. .... 56 Ore "bodies at the South Temple workings ........... 58 Ore "bodies at the North Tempi© workings ........... 65 Other deposits. ....................... 65 ore minerals and mineraloids. ............... 67 Origin of the deposits ...................... 73 Outlook and suggestions for prospectinge ............. 86 Summary and conclusions. ..................... 88 Bibliography ........................... 90 Figure 1. Index map of Temple Mountain distriet 9 2mery County, e e 2. General seotion of roek formations in the San Hafael Swell, Utah. ..................... 12 3o G-eologi© section and map of the surface of Shinarump Mesa, Emery County, TTtah ...............In envelope ty. Sketch sections surrounding Shinarump Mesa, Emery County, Utah .....................In envelope 4 ILLUSTEA.TXOUS (Continued) Figore 5» Maps and sections of the South Temple workings,, Temple Mountain district,, Emery County, Utah . N. In envelope 6 to 16. .Columnar sections SH-1 to SH-11, inclusive, Shinarurap Mesa, Emery County, Utah . «,,.... 28-38 Ta"ble 1, Analyses of channel samples p Shinarump Mesa9 Tempi© Mountain di strict 9 Emery County , Utah ........ 39 2, Analyses of bituminous sandstone and conglomerate, Temple Mountain district ,, Utah ........... 49 3. Analyses of samples, Through adit, South Temple workings. .... .<>. ......... ., , Eadiometric and chemical analyses of selected samples, Temple Mountain districts Emery County, Utah. a . ?2 URANIUM DEPOSITS AT SHINARUMP MESA AID SOME ADJACENT AREAS IN THE TEMPLE MOUNTAIN DISTRICT, EMERT COUNTY, UTAH By Donald G. Wyant ABSTRACT Deposits of uraniferous hydrocarbons are associated with carnotite in the Shinarump conglomerate of Trias sic age at Shinarump Mesa and ad­ jacent areas of the Temple Mountain district in th© San Rafael Swell of Emery County9 Utah. .The irregular ore todies of carnotite-tearing sand­ stone are genetically related to lenticular uraniferous ore "bodies con­ taining disseminated asphaltitie and humic hydrocarbon in permeable sand­ stones and were localized indirectly "by sedimentary controls. .Nearly non-uraniferous "bitumen commonly permeates the sandstones in the Shinarump conglomerate and the underlying Moenkopi formation in the area. The ore deposits at Temple Mountain have teen altered locally "by hydrothermal solutions, and in other deposits throughout the area carnotite has "been transported "by ground and surface water. Uraniferous asphaltite is thought to "be the non-volatile, residue of an original weakly uraniferous crude oil that migrated into the San Rafael anticline; the ore metals concentrated in the asphaltite as the oil was devolatilizad and polymerized. Carnotite is thought to have formed from the asphaltite "by ground water leaching. It is concluded that additional study of the genesis of the asphalt it ic uranium ores in the San Rafael Swell, of the processes "by which the hydrocarbons interact and are modified (such as heat, poly­ merization, and hydrogenation -under the influence of alpha-ray "bombard­ ment), of petroleum source "beds, and of volcanic intrusive rocks of Tertiary age are of fundamental importance in the continuing study of the uranium deposits on the Colorado Plateau. INTRODUCTION The asphaltic ores of uranium and vanadium in the Temple Mountain district, Emery County, Utah have long "been of interest to geologists and, occasionally, to miners. The ore can now "be treated successfully com­ mercially and the importance of the district will probably increase with additional prospecting and the further increase and application of factual geologic data. Prom these data, interpretation may lead to additional discoveries of ore in the San Rafael Swellj and would prob­ ably aid in the "better understanding of the genesis of other uranium deposits elsewhere in the Colorado Plateau. The Temple Mountain district (fig. l) is within
Recommended publications
  • Geology of U Rani Urn Deposits in Triassic Rocks of the Colorado Plateau Region
    Geology of U rani urn Deposits in Triassic Rocks of the Colorado Plateau Region By W. I. FINCH CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE GEOLOGY OF URANIUM GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1074-D This report concerns work done on behalf ~1 the U. S. Atomic Energy Commission -Jnd is published with the permission of ~he Commission NITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1959 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRED A. SEATON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printin~ Office Washin~ton 25, D. C. CONTENTS Page Abstract---------------------------------------------------------- 125 Introduction__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 125 History of mining and production ____ ------------------------------- 127 Geologic setting___________________________________________________ 128 StratigraphY-------------------------------------------------- 129 ~oenkopiformation_______________________________________ ~29 Middle Triassic unconformity_______________________________ 131 Chinle formation__________________________________________ 131 Shinarump Inernber____________________________________ 133 ~udstone member------------------------------------- 136 ~oss Back member____________________________________ 136 Upper part of the Chinle formation______________________ 138 Wingate sandstone_________________________________________ 138 lgneousrocks_________________________________________________ 139 Structure_____________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Iidentilica2tion and Occurrence of Uranium and Vanadium Identification and Occurrence of Uranium and Vanadium Minerals from the Colorado Plateaus
    IIdentilica2tion and occurrence of uranium and Vanadium Identification and Occurrence of Uranium and Vanadium Minerals From the Colorado Plateaus c By A. D. WEEKS and M. E. THOMPSON A CONTRIBUTION TO THE GEOLOGY OF URANIUM GEOLOGICAL S U R V E Y BULL E TIN 1009-B For jeld geologists and others having few laboratory facilities.- This report concerns work done on behalf of the U. S. Atomic Energy Commission and is published with the permission of the Commission. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1954 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE- INTERIOR FRED A. SEATON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan. Director Reprint, 1957 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Ofice Washington 25, D. C. - Price 25 cents (paper cover) CONTENTS Page 13 13 13 14 14 14 15 15 15 15 16 16 17 17 17 18 18 19 20 21 21 22 23 24 25 25 26 27 28 29 29 30 30 31 32 33 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 , 40 41 42 42 1v CONTENTS Page 46 47 48 49 50 50 51 52 53 54 54 55 56 56 57 58 58 59 62 TABLES TABLE1. Optical properties of uranium minerals ______________________ 44 2. List of mine and mining district names showing county and State________________________________________---------- 60 IDENTIFICATION AND OCCURRENCE OF URANIUM AND VANADIUM MINERALS FROM THE COLORADO PLATEAUS By A. D. WEEKSand M. E. THOMPSON ABSTRACT This report, designed to make available to field geologists and others informa- tion obtained in recent investigations by the Geological Survey on identification and occurrence of uranium minerals of the Colorado Plateaus, contains descrip- tions of the physical properties, X-ray data, and in some instances results of chem- ical and spectrographic analysis of 48 uranium arid vanadium minerals.
    [Show full text]
  • 42EM65, the Temple Mountain Pictograph Panel
    Steven J. Manning 42EM65, The Temple Mountain Pictograph Panel The Temple Mountain rock art panel, as it is The location of the Temple Mountain panel has called locally, is a group of large and striking been discussed in several "guide books" darkred pictographs (Figure 1). They are locat- (Barnes 1982:136, Castleton 1984:160, Slifer ed on the north side of South Temple Mountain 2000:126). The content of the panel has also Wash, roughly one mile west of the turnoff to been discussed in the rock art literature on sev- Goblin Valley State Park, which is in the San eral occasions (Gunnerson 1957, Manning Rafael Reef area of central Utah. 1990, Schaafsma 1970, 1971 and Siegrist Because the site can easily be seen from the 1972). paved road it is well known and heavily visited. The Temple Mountain pictographs are excep- The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) rang- tional—more exceptional than is generally ap- er in an information trailer at the turnoff to preciated, especially considering the apparent Goblin Valley said that he personally had over poor condition of the panel. The cliff face is 10,000 visitor contacts the previous year marred by large areas of exfoliated sandstone (2001). These contacts are with people request- (Figure 1). It appears that most of the picto- ing information about the San Rafael Reef area graphs have been destroyed, and the ones that as they drive in from State highway 24. I no- remain are severely damaged. Despite this de- ticed, during the hour I spent visiting with the terioration, the panel contains a great deal of ranger one morning, that only about one out of extremely valuable information, and the re- every ten cars stopped as they passed the trailer; maining images are unique and obviously irre- so 10,000 people is certainly an underestimate placeable.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Date 06/10/2021 21:27:28
    Taphonomy of fossil plants in the Upper Triassic Chinle Formation. Item Type text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Demko, Timothy Michael. Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 06/10/2021 21:27:28 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/187397 INFORMATION TO USERS I This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print' bleed through, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy.
    [Show full text]
  • Recreation Guide to the San Rafael Area – Moab Area Travel Council - 7/11/06 Page 1
    Recreation Guide to the San Rafael Area – Moab Area Travel Council - 7/11/06 Page 1 include tent pads, picnic tables, toilets, Areas South of 1-70 and fire rings. No drinking water is Recreation Guide to the available. When camping at other areas, 5. Head of Sinbad / Swasey's Cabin San Rafael Area please use existing undeveloped campsites to avoid impacting new areas. Just off 1-70, the Head of Sinbad area invites camping, hiking, and exploring. 2. Wedge Overlook The elements have molded the buff- colored sandstone into pocketed The Wedge Overlook provides a striking watchtowers and other fanciful shapes. Moab Area Travel Council view of the Little Grand Canyon, the San Internet Brochure Series Rafael River, and the Sid's Mountain Members of the Swasey family first Available from: Wilderness Study Area. To protect the grazed livestock in the area in the late fragile resources, notably an endangered 1800's. Today visitors may see the log discovermoab.com cactus species, use of motorized vehicles cabin they built in 1921. Listed on the and mountain bikes is limited to Utah State Register of Historic Sites, the designated roads and camping is limited cabin can be reached from 1-70 from to designated sites. To visit the overlook, ranch exit 129. Head west and south from INTRODUCTION drive from the town of Cleveland south exit 129 for four miles. Turn right and towards the San Rafael Recreation Site. continue for 1.1 miles. Turn right again Continue beyond the Buckhorn Reservoir and travel in a northwesterly direction for The San Rafael Swell, 2,000 square miles just over four miles to the water tank at about four miles.
    [Show full text]
  • Spcoll Energy Tel 328A (F
    SpColl Energy TEl 328A (f/ r.=== UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY TEI-328A / GEOLOGIC ASPECTS OF THE RESOURCE APPRAISAL OF URANIUM DEPOSITS IN PRE-MORRISON FORMATIONS OF THE COLORADO PLATEAU: An Interim Report By W. I. Finch This preliminary report Is released without editorial and technical review for conformity with official standards and nomenclature, to make the information available to interested organizations and to stimulate the search for uranium deposits. May 1953 II ... ,..... , ............. ,,N., '" .. UNITED STATES ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION Technical Information Service, Oak Ridge, Te!!nALL~ ~·· ·-- ·--:~ ~~r0-:: Lc~if;;.·~·:;·. GEOLOGY AND MINERALOGY This report has been reproduced direct from copy as submitted to the Technical Information Service. Arrangements for reproduction of this document in whole or in part should be made directly with the author and the organiza­ tion he represents. Such reproduction is encouraged by the United States Atomic Energy Commission. 2 AEC, oak Ridge, Tenn.,-W36235 3 CONTENTS Page c Abstract c 5 Introduction 8 Geologic setting • 10 Stratigraphy c 0 • • 10 Moenkopi formation 0 • • 10 Shinarump conglomerate ' 13 Chinle formation ' ' • • ' • • • 15 Structure and igneous rocks 0 • • 16 Ore deposits , c 0 ' ' . • • • 17 Mineralogy • 0 0 17 Principal uranium minerals 17 Vanadium and copper minerals ' 18 Other minerals ' 18 ,, Types of deposits 0 0 • 18 Vanadium-uranium deposits • 0 19 Copper-uranium deposits 0 ' • 19 Uranium deposits 0 • • • • • 20 Habits of uranium ore deposits 0 0 20 • ' • Guides to ore deposits 0 0 22 ' • Thickening of beds 0 • ' 22 Alteration of mudstone and underlying beds • 23 Carbonaceous material • • • 0 23 Other guides , , 0 • 0 0 • • • • • " 24 Comparison of uranium deposits in Shinarump and Morrison formations 0 .
    [Show full text]
  • Geology and Uranium Deposits of the Temple Mountain District Emery County, Utah
    Geology and Uranium Deposits of the Temple Mountain District Emery County, Utah By C. C. HAWLEY, D. G. WYANT, and D. B. BROOKS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1192 Prepared on behalf of the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission RECEIVED MAY 91966 I.U.J. LIMSVUU. IY. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 196S UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. GS 65-310. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Abstract__ _____________________________________________________ 1 Introduction._____________________________________________________ 3 Geography _____ _______________________________________ 4 History of mining operations and production._____________________ 6 Previous geologic work_________________________________.___-___ 9 Fieldwork and acknowledgments._______________________________ 12 Analyses._-_________-______-__-_-_-^-___--__-_--____-___-__-__-_- 13 Geology.__.__..________...._______________ 15 Stratigraphy._________________________________________________ 15 Permian System_________________________________________ 15 Triassic and Jurassic Systems.______________________________ 16 Moenkopi Fonnation_________-______-____--______---__ 16 Chinle Formation_________--.__________-____-----__- 18 Temple Mountain and Monitor Butte Members.--..-- 18 Moss Back Member....___________________________ 20 Church Rock Member...__-___------_-_-_ _. 29 Wingate Sandstone_--__-__----_-_-__-_---_---__-------
    [Show full text]
  • Temple Mountain Member --A New
    TEMPLE MOUNTAIN MEMBER --A NEW MEMBER OF THE CHINLE FORMATION IN THE SAN RAFAEL SWELL, UTAH By Raymond C. Robeck Trace Elements Memorandum Report 800 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY IN REPLY REFER TOt UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WASHINGTON 25. D. C. AEC - 745/6 May 17, 1956 Mr, Bbbert D» Nininger, Assistant Director Division of Raw Materials U. S. Atomic Energy'Commission Washington 25, D0 C« Dear Bob? Transmitted herewith are three copies of TEH-SOO, Temple Mountain member—a new member of the Chinle formation in the San Rafael Swell, Utah, w by Raymond C. Robeck, March 1956* We are asking Mr. Hosted to approre our plan to submit this report for publication as a geologic note in the Bulletin of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists. Sincerely yours, O o i—-*- W. H, Bradley Chief Geologist 1 2001 Geology and Mineralogy This document consists of 19 pages, Series A UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY TEMPLE MOUNTAIN MEMBER A NEW MEMBER OF THE GHINLE FORMATION IN THE SAN RAFAEL SWELL, UTAH* Raymond Co Robeck JUL 1 5 1983 V „ March 1956 Trace Elements Memorandum Report 800 This preliminary report is distributed without editorial and technical review for conformity with official standards and nomenclature. It is not for public inspection or quotation. *This report concerns work done on behalf of the Division of Raw Materials of the U 0 S 0 Atomic Energy Commission. 2 USGS - TM-800 GEOLOGY AND MINERALOGY Distribution (Series A) No. of copies Atomic Energy Commission, Washington ..........'.
    [Show full text]
  • Recreation Guide to the San Rafael Area
    Safety Tips Bureau of Land Management To ensure that your stay in the San Rafael area is a safe and enjoyable experience, consider the following safety tips: A dry wash can flash flood in a matter of minutes even if you don't see a cloud in the sky. Never camp or park your vehicle in a stream bed. Recreation Guide Water is essential - at least a gallon per person per day in the summer. If you find free-flowing water, it might not be safe to drink. Carry your own. to the Wear a hat in the summer and remember that extreme temperature changes are possible in all seasons. Anticipate problems. Take extra food, clothing and vehicle repair parts and fluids. San Rafael Area Let someone know where you're going and when you expect to return. If you should break down or become lost, stay with your vehicle - it's a lot more visible to searchers. And speaking of getting lost: the map in this brochure is a general guide. It is a good idea to pick up a large-scale map that shows roads, trails and topography in detail. Bureau of Land Management The San Rafael has historically been a mining area. When you are exploring around San Rafael Resource Area mines, be very careful; old mines and the ground around them can be dangerous. If P.O. Drawer AB, Price, Utah 84501 (801) 637-4584 the mine is currently being worked, please respect the miner's claims. Very few desert creatures are dangerous to humans but all creatures can be Canyonlands Natural History Association dangerous when cornered.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Population Study of Small Vertebrates in the Uranium Areas of the Upper Colorado River Basin of Utah Wilmer W
    Brigham Young University Science Bulletin, Biological Series Volume 7 | Number 1 Article 1 5-1965 A comparative population study of small vertebrates in the uranium areas of the Upper Colorado River Basin of Utah Wilmer W. Tanner Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/byuscib Part of the Anatomy Commons, Botany Commons, Physiology Commons, and the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Tanner, Wilmer W. (1965) "A comparative population study of small vertebrates in the uranium areas of the Upper Colorado River Basin of Utah," Brigham Young University Science Bulletin, Biological Series: Vol. 7 : No. 1 , Article 1. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/byuscib/vol7/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Brigham Young University Science Bulletin, Biological Series by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. S-NA-P^ mUS. COMP. ZOOL LIBRARY JAN 2 8 1966 HARVARD UNIVERSITY BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY SCIENCE BULLETIN A COMPARATIVE POPULATION STUDY OF SMALL VERTEBRATES IN THE URANIUM AREAS OF THE UPPER COLORADO RIVER BASIN OF UTAH by Wilmer W. Tanner Biological Series — Volume VII, Number 1 MAY, 1965 BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY SCIENCE BULLETIN A COMPARATIVE POPULATION STUDY OF SMALL VERTEBRATES IN THE URANIUM AREAS OF THE UPPER COLORADO RIVER BASIN OF UTAH by Wilmer W. Tanner Biological Series — Volume VII, Number 1 MAY, 1965 tviuS. COMP. ZOOL LIBRARY JAW HARVARD UNIVERSITY PREFACE This paper constitutes a terminal report to the United States Atomic Energy Commission for contract AT(11-1)819.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology, Altered Rocks and Ore Deposits of the San Rafael Swell Emery County, Utah
    Geology, Altered Rocks And Ore Deposits of The San Rafael Swell Emery County, Utah By C. C. HAWLEY, R. C. ROBECK, and H. B. DYER GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1239 A study of the stratigraphy, structure, alteration, and uraniferous deposits in sedimentary rocks, with emphasis on the Chinle Formation Prepared on behalf of the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1968 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. GS 67-287 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Abstract... _ _ ____ _ ________ ____ 1 Introduction_____._._________-__________--_-_-______________--_--_ 5 Location and geography_____ ____ _____________ _ ______ 7 Some previous geologic investigations-___________!.-- ___ - 7 Sources of data and acknowledgments _-_---_--_ _____ 9 Stratigraphy_________________________________.____._________-_---- 10 Pre-Triassic rocks____________ 10 Triassic System.______________________________________________ 11 Moenkopi Formation_______________-_-___-__________-_---_ 11 Chinle Formation___________________________________ __ 14 Monitor Butte and Temple Mountain Members____ ____ 14 Moss Back Member_____.______________ 20 Channels in the Chinle Formation_______________________ 23 Church Rock Member__________-___-__-_________------ 25 Triassic and Jurassic Glen Canyon Group__________-__-___-_---__ 26 Post-Glen Canyon rocks_____________-______-______-____-_----
    [Show full text]
  • Interim Geologic Map of the Temple Mountain Quadrangle Emery County, Utah
    INTERIM GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE TEMPLE MOUNTAIN QUADRANGLE EMERY COUNTY, UTAH by Hellmut H. Doelling and Paul A. Kuehne Disclaimer This open-file release makes information available to the public during the review and production period necessary for a formal UGS publication. This map may be incomplete, and possible inconsistencies, errors, and omissions have not been resolved. While the document is in the review process, it may not conform to UGS standards; therefore it may be premature for an individual or group to take actions based on its contents. Although this product represents the work of professional scientists, the Utah Department of Natural Resources, Utah Geological Survey, makes no warranty, expressed or implied, regarding its suitability for a particular use. The Utah Department of Natural Resources, Utah Geological Survey, shall not be liable under any circumstances for any direct, indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages with respect to claims by users of this product. For use at 1:24,000 scale only. The UGS does not guarantee accuracy or completeness of the data. This geologic map was funded by the Utah Geological Survey and U.S. Geological Survey, National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program, through USGS STATEMAP award number 07HQAG0141. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the U.S. Government. OPEN-FILE REPORT 541 Utah GEOLOGICAL SURVEY a division of Utah
    [Show full text]