Geology of Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, Utah Hellmut H

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Geology of Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, Utah Hellmut H Geology of Utah’s Parks and Monuments 2000 Utah Geological Association Publication 28 D.A. Sprinkel, T.C. Chidsey, Jr., and P.B. Anderson, editors Geology of Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, Utah Hellmut H. Doelling1, Robert E. Blackett1, Alden H. Hamblin2, J. Douglas Powell3, and Gayle L. Pollock4 ABSTRACT The 1.9-million-acre Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument was created September 18, 1996 by President Clin- ton and was the first national monument to be placed under the management of the U.S. Bureau of Land Management. Located in southern Utah, the monument contains an array of geological, paleontological, historic, archaeological, and bi- ological resources. It lies in a remote area comprised of canyons, plateaus, mesas, and cliffs set in an environment of col- orful geologic formations. The monument is surrounded by several national and state parks, a primitive area, and a national recreation area. It can be divided into three geographical sections: from west to east these are the Grand Staircase, Kaiparowits Basin, and Es- calante Canyons sections. Rock formations exposed in these sections range in age from Permian to Cretaceous comprising more than 200 million years of Earth’s history. Structurally, these rocks dip gently northward, and are deformed by most- ly north-south-trending faults, anticlines, synclines, and monoclines. The monument area contains known coal, oil and gas, and mineral resources and potential resources which are gener- ally undeveloped because market areas are distant and because ways of transporting the commodities out of the region have never been in place. As a national monument, the area will provide many future opportunities to study a region of remarkably well-exposed geology. INTRODUCTION incorporating the principles of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA). The proclamation gov- Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument was erns how the provisions of FLPMA will be applied within established by presidential proclamation on September 18, the monument. FLPMA directs the BLM to manage pub- 1996 to protect an array of geological, paleontological, his- lic land on the basis of multiple use and in a manner that toric, archaeological, and biological resources. Following will protect the quality of scientific, scenic, historic, eco- the creation of the monument, Congress passed the Utah logical, environmental, air and atmospheric, water re- Schools and Land Exchange Act, which transferred own- sources, and archaeological resources (U.S. Department of ership of all trust lands administered by the Utah School Interior, 2000). and Institutional Trust Lands Administration (SITLA) The monument covers about 1.9 million acres of land (176,699 acres) and trust mineral interests (24,000) acres in south-central Utah (figure 1). About 68 percent of the within the monument boundaries, to the Federal Govern- monument is in Kane County, while the remaining 32 per- ment. In exchange for these interests, and other lands and cent is in Garfield County. Conversely, about 49 percent of interests within national parks and monuments in Utah, Kane County and 18 percent of Garfield County lie within the State of Utah received title to federal lands elsewhere, the monument boundaries. The monument is primarily mineral royalties from other federal lands in Utah, and a surrounded on three sides by national forest and national one-time cash payment. It is the first national monument park lands, as well as other BLM administered lands to the managed by the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM), south and west. Kodachrome State Park also adjoins the 1 Utah Geological Survey, Salt Lake City, UT 84114-6100 monument near Cannonville. For more information on 2 Fremont Indian State Park and Museum, Sevier, UT 84766 3 monument management and use restrictions, the reader Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, Kanab, UT 84741 4 should refer to the approved management plan (U.S. De- Bryce Canyon National History Association, Bryce Canyon National Park, UT 84717-0002 partment of Interior, 2000) 1 H.H. Doelling, R.E. Blackett, A.H. Hamblin, J.D. Powell, and G.L. Pollock Geology of Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, Utah Antimony Capitol Canyonlands Reef National Park Dixie Dixie National Forest National Park National Boulder Forest Town Panguitch Escalante Hildale Tropic N Hatch Bullfrog Henrieville GARFIELD CO. Glen Long Valley Cannonville Canyon UTAH KANE CO. National Junction Alton Bryce Zion Canyon Grand Staircase- Recreation Area National Glendale National Escalante Park Park National Monument Orderville Paria 0 Mt Carmel Paria 20 miles Canyon Adairville Johnson Primitive Church Wells Canyon Area Kanab Big Water Towns and settlements Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument National Parks Glen Canyon National Recreation Area Paria Canyon Primitive Area Dixie National Forest BLM, State, and private land FigureFi 1.g ureIndex 1. map Index for Grand map forStaircase-Escalante the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument Nationalin Garfield Monument and Kane Counties, in Garfield Utah. and The Kane 1.9-million-acre Counties, monument is encircled by national parks, a national recreation area, a primitive area, and a national forest. Four state parks, Coral Pink Sand Dunes, Kodachrome, Escalante Petrified Forest, and Anasazi Indian Village State Parks are also in the area, west of Kanab, near Cannonville, near Escalante, and near Boulder Town, respectively. Boulder 26 Wolverine Loop 15 road 4 Burr Trail 10 3 Escalante 27 13 12 20 16 5 Escalante 0 5 10 15 20 Canyons MILES d 23 a section o 22 S H Tropic r o t l h r e s a - 12 in a i - g th W h 7 e Cannonville t -R y 21 d o e a c Henrieville v k l o r ro GARFIELD COUNTY A n a 18 y 8 d C t C KANE COUNTY e l ll i 9 o f f 11 C s 22 or 6 89 F if Grand Staircase ty d m a 24 i o section le r C r o M d t Glendale 27 o o a o n u h r n a d r p o t m a h a Paria 12 a tu o s S i u r d n k a m S h Townsite s o W Kaiparowits Basin a k 2 W 17 d y 22 o M l o section 25 t a w n Orderville r 25 n r r o o o d 27 t a t Smoky a C d o o r Hollow n C e n Loop h y c t 24 C road i 14 K n o s n 25 h 19 1 o J Kanab Big Water 89 89 UTAH ARIZONA Figure 2. Map showing the locations of the classic geologic sites (numbers) within Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument in southern Utah. See text for descriptions of these sites. Also, the Grand Staircase section is shown in blue, the Kaiparowits Basin section in yellow, and the Escalante Canyons section in green. 2 D.A. Sprinkel, T.C. Chidsey, Jr., and P.B. Anderson, editors 2000 Utah Geological Association Publication 28 GEOGRAPHY capped by the Upper Triassic Shinarump Member of the Chinle Formation. Descriptions of these formations are Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument is lo- given in the stratigraphy section of this paper. Discontin- cated within the Colorado Plateau physiographic uous Shinarump outcrops explain why this riser is not province, near its western margin. It is bordered by the well developed in the monument. The next step is known gateway communities of Boulder, Escalante, Henrieville, as the Shinarump Flats. This bench is mostly developed Cannonville, Tropic, Glendale, Kanab, and Big Water (fig- on top of the hard Shinarump Member and the overlying ures 1 and 2). Annual precipitation in the region varies soft Petrified Forest Member of the Chinle Formation. The from about six inches at the lowest altitudes near Lake Vermilion Cliffs form the next riser, which is well devel- Powell (4,000 ft), to about 25 inches at the highest altitudes oped in the monument. The cliffs are made up of the re- near Canaan Peak (9,280 ft). The variations in altitude and sistant red sandstone beds of the Lower Jurassic Moenave precipitation produce three climatic zones: upland, semi- and Kayenta Formations. The Wygaret Terrace forms the desert, and desert. At the highest altitudes, precipitation next step and includes the soft upper part of the Kayenta falls primarily during the winter. The majority of precipi- and the lower parts of the Lower Jurassic Navajo Sand- tation in the semi-desert and desert areas occurs during stone. The imposing White Cliffs form the next riser and the summer months. consist of the upper part of the Navajo Sandstone and the The monument may be divided into three broad areas: Middle Jurassic Co-op Creek Limestone Member of the from west to east these are the Grand Staircase, Kaiparow- Carmel Formation. The bench on this riser is the Sku- its Basin, and Escalante Canyons sections (figure 2). The tumpah Terrace built on the remaining soft parts of the Grand Staircase section is a broad feature that encom- Carmel Formation and the overlying Entrada Sandstone. passes the western third of the monument, and consists of The Gray Cliffs are a series of low cliffs formed by hard a series of topographic benches and cliffs that, as its name Cretaceous sandstone beds. Several benches have formed implies, step progressively up in elevation from south to between these cliffs in the softer shales and sandstones of north. The risers correspond to cliffs and the steps corre- the Tropic, Straight Cliffs, Wahweap, and Kaiparowits For- spond to the benches, terraces, or plateaus in the staircase mations. The final riser, mostly north and west of the (figure 3).
Recommended publications
  • PRELUDE to SEVEN SLOTS: FILLING and SUBSEQUENT MODIFICATION of SEVEN BROAD CANYONS in the NAVAJO SANDSTONE, SOUTH-CENTRAL UTAH by David B
    PRELUDE TO SEVEN SLOTS: FILLING AND SUBSEQUENT MODIFICATION OF SEVEN BROAD CANYONS IN THE NAVAJO SANDSTONE, SOUTH-CENTRAL UTAH by David B. Loope1, Ronald J. Goble1, and Joel P. L. Johnson2 ABSTRACT Within a four square kilometer portion of Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, seven distinct slot canyons cut the Jurassic Navajo Sandstone. Four of the slots developed along separate reaches of a trunk stream (Dry Fork of Coyote Gulch), and three (including canyons locally known as “Peekaboo” and “Spooky”) are at the distal ends of south-flowing tributary drainages. All these slot canyons are examples of epigenetic gorges—bedrock channel reaches shifted laterally from previous reach locations. The previous channels became filled with alluvium, allowing active channels to shift laterally in places and to subsequently re-incise through bedrock elsewhere. New evidence, based on optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) ages, indicates that this thick alluvium started to fill broad, pre-existing, bedrock canyons before 55,000 years ago, and that filling continued until at least 48,000 years ago. Streams start to fill their channels when sediment supply increases relative to stream power. The following conditions favored alluviation in the study area: (1) a cooler, wetter climate increased the rate of mass wasting along the Straight Cliffs (the headwaters of Dry Fork) and the rate of weathering of the broad outcrops of Navajo and Entrada Sandstone; (2) windier conditions increased the amount of eolian sand transport, perhaps destabilizing dunes and moving their stored sediment into stream channels; and (3) southward migration of the jet stream dimin- ished the frequency and severity of convective storms.
    [Show full text]
  • Ron Blakey, Publications (Does Not Include Abstracts)
    Ron Blakey, Publications (does not include abstracts) The publications listed below were mainly produced during my tenure as a member of the Geology Department at Northern Arizona University. Those after 2009 represent ongoing research as Professor Emeritus. (PDF) – A PDF is available for this paper. Send me an email and I'll attach to return email Blakey, R.C., 1973, Stratigraphy and origin of the Moenkopi Formation of southeastern Utah: Mountain Geologist, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 1 17. Blakey, R.C., 1974, Stratigraphic and depositional analysis of the Moenkopi Formation, Southeastern Utah: Utah Geological Survey Bulletin 104, 81 p. Blakey, R.C., 1977, Petroliferous lithosomes in the Moenkopi Formation, Southern Utah: Utah Geology, vol. 4, no. 2, p. 67 84. Blakey, R.C., 1979, Oil impregnated carbonate rocks of the Timpoweap Member Moenkopi Formation, Hurricane Cliffs area, Utah and Arizona: Utah Geology, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 45 54. Blakey, R.C., 1979, Stratigraphy of the Supai Group (Pennsylvanian Permian), Mogollon Rim, Arizona: in Carboniferous Stratigraphy of the Grand Canyon Country, northern Arizona and southern Nevada, Field Trip No. 13, Ninth International Congress of Carboniferous Stratigraphy and Geology, p. 89 109. Blakey, R.C., 1979, Lower Permian stratigraphy of the southern Colorado Plateau: in Four Corners Geological Society, Guidebook to the Permian of the Colorado Plateau, p. 115 129. (PDF) Blakey, R.C., 1980, Pennsylvanian and Early Permian paleogeography, southern Colorado Plateau and vicinity: in Paleozoic Paleogeography of west central United States, Rocky Mountain Section, Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, p. 239 258. Blakey, R.C., Peterson, F., Caputo, M.V., Geesaman, R., and Voorhees, B., 1983, Paleogeography of Middle Jurassic continental, shoreline, and shallow marine sedimentation, southern Utah: Mesozoic PaleogeogÂraphy of west central United States, Rocky Mountain Section of Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists (Symposium), p.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyclicity, Dune Migration, and Wind Velocity in Lower Permian Eolian Strata, Manitou Springs, CO
    Cyclicity, Dune Migration, and Wind Velocity in Lower Permian Eolian Strata, Manitou Springs, CO by James Daniel Pike, B.S. A Thesis In Geology Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Texas Tech University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCES Approved Dustin E. Sweet Chair of Committee Tom M. Lehman Jeffery A. Lee Mark Sheridan Dean of the Graduate School August, 2017 Copyright 2017, James D. Pike Texas Tech University, James Daniel Pike, August 2017 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to extend my greatest thanks to my advisor Dr. Dustin Sweet, who was an excellent advisor during this research. Dr. Sweet was vital throughout the whole process, be it answering questions, giving feedback on figures, and imparting his extensive knowledge of the ancestral Rocky Mountains on me; for this I am extremely grateful. Dr. Sweet allowed me to conduct my own research without looking over my shoulder, but was always available when needed. When I needed a push, Dr. Sweet provided it. I would like to thank my committee memebers, Dr. Lee and Dr. Lehman for providing feedback and for their unique perspectives. I would like to thank Jenna Hessert, Trent Jackson, and Khaled Chowdhury for acting as my field assistants. Their help in taking measurements, collecting samples, recording GPS coordinates, and providing unique perspectives was invaluable. Thank you to Melanie Barnes for allowing me to use her lab, and putting up with the mess I made. This research was made possible by a grant provided by the Colorado Scientific Society, and a scholarship provided by East Texas Geological Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Scoping Report: Grand Staircase-Escalante National
    CONTENTS 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 1 2 Scoping Process ....................................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Purpose of Scoping ........................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Scoping Outreach .............................................................................................................................. 3 2.2.1 Publication of the Notice of Intent ....................................................................................... 3 2.2.2 Other Outreach Methods ....................................................................................................... 3 2.3 Opportunities for Public Comment ................................................................................................ 3 2.4 Public Scoping Meetings .................................................................................................................. 4 2.5 Cooperating Agency Involvement ................................................................................................... 4 2.6 National Historic Preservation Act and Tribal Consultation ....................................................... 5 3 Submission Processing and Comment Coding .................................................................................... 5
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial Vertebrate Fauna of the Kaiparowits Basin
    Great Basin Naturalist Volume 40 Number 4 Article 2 12-31-1980 Terrestrial vertebrate fauna of the Kaiparowits Basin N. Duane Atwood U.S. Forest Service, Provo, Utah Clyde L. Pritchett Brigham Young University Richard D. Porter U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Provo, Utah Benjamin W. Wood Brigham Young University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Atwood, N. Duane; Pritchett, Clyde L.; Porter, Richard D.; and Wood, Benjamin W. (1980) "Terrestrial vertebrate fauna of the Kaiparowits Basin," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 40 : No. 4 , Article 2. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol40/iss4/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. TERRESTRIAL VERTEBRATE FAUNA OF THE KAIPAROWITS BASIN N. Diiane Atwood', Clyde L. Pritchctt', Richard D. Porter', and Benjamin W. Wood' .\bstr^ct.- This report inehides data collected during an investigation by Brighani Young University personnel to 1976, as well as a literature from 1971 review. The fauna of the Kaiparowits Basin is represented by 7 species of salamander, toads, mnphihians (1 5 and 1 tree frog), 29 species of reptiles (1 turtle, 16 lizards, and 12 snakes), 183 species of birds (plus 2 hypothetical), and 74 species of mammals. Geographic distribution of the various species within the basin are discussed. Birds are categorized according to their population and seasonal status.
    [Show full text]
  • A Preliminary Assessment of Archaeological Resources Within the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, Utah
    A PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES WITHIN THE GRAND STAIRCASE-ESCALANTE NATIONAL MONUMENT, UTAH by David B. Madsen Common rock art elements of the Fremont and Anasazi on the Colorado Plateau and the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument. ,I!! CIRCULAR 95 . 1997 I~\' UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ." if;~~ 6EPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES ISBN 1-55791-605-5 STATE OF UTAH Michael O. Leavitt, Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Ted Stewart, Executive Director UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY M. Lee Allison~ Director UGS Board Member Representing Russell C. Babcock, Jr. (chairman) .................................................................................................. Mineral Industry D. Cary Smith ................................................................................................................................... Mineral Industry Richard R. Kennedy ....................................................................................................................... Civil Engineering E.H. Deedee O'Brien ......................................................................................................................... Public-at-Large C. William Berge .............................................................................................................................. Mineral Industry Jerry Golden ..................................................................................................................................... Mineral Industry Milton E. Wadsworth ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Relation of Sediment Load and Flood-Plain Formation to Climatic Variability, Paria River Drainage Basin, Utah and Arizona
    Relation of sediment load and flood-plain formation to climatic variability, Paria River drainage basin, Utah and Arizona JULIA B. GRAF U.S. Geological Survey, Water Resources Division, 375 S. Euclid, Tucson, Arizona 85719 ROBERT H. WEBB U.S. Geological Survey, 1675 W. Anklam Road, Tucson, Arizona 85745 RICHARD HEREFORD U.S. Geological Survey, Geologic Division, 2255 North Gemini Drive, Flagstaff, Arizona 86001 ABSTRACT sediment load for a given discharge declined fill that rises 1-5 m above the modern channel abruptly in the early 1940s in the Colorado bed. Flood-plain deposits are present in all Suspended-sediment load, flow volume, River at Grand Canyon (Daines, 1949; Howard, major tributaries of the Paria River. The area of and flood characteristics of the Paria River 1960; Thomas and others, 1960; Hereford, flood plains is slightly greater than 20 km2, and were analyzed to determine their relation to 1987a). The decline in suspended-sediment sediment volume is estimated to be about 40 climate and flood-plain alluviation between loads has been attributed to improved land use million m3 (Hereford, 1987c). Typically, flood 1923 and 1986. Flood-plain alluviation began and conservation measures initiated in the 1930s plains are not present in first-order drainage ba- about 1940 at a time of decreasing magnitude (Hadley, 1977). A change in sediment-sampler sins but are present in basins of second and and frequency of floods in winter, summer, type and in methods of analysis have been higher order where the stream channel is uncon- and fall. No floods with stages high enough to discounted as causes for the observed decrease fined and crosses nonresistant bedrock forma- inundate the flood plain have occurred since (Daines, 1949; Thomas and others, 1960).
    [Show full text]
  • Calcite Cementation of Sixty-Five-Year-Old Aragonite Sand Dredge Pile
    University of Mississippi eGrove Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2011 Calcite Cementation of Sixty-Five-Year-Old Aragonite Sand Dredge Pile Nathan M. Snyder Follow this and additional works at: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd Part of the Geology Commons Recommended Citation Snyder, Nathan M., "Calcite Cementation of Sixty-Five-Year-Old Aragonite Sand Dredge Pile" (2011). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 269. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd/269 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at eGrove. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of eGrove. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CALCITE CEMENTATION OF SIXTY-FIVE-YEAR-OLD ARAGONITE SAND DREDGE PILE A Thesis presented in partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of Master of Science in the Department of Geology and Geological Engineering The University of Mississippi by NATHANIAL M. SNYDER May 2011 Copyright Nathanial M. Snyder ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ABSTRACT Dredging of the harbor at Stocking Island, Bahamas (23°31’45”N, 75°49’41”W) in 1942 produced four dredge piles of cross-bedded aragonite skeletal sand. The spoils piles are on the leeward (western) shore of the island, where they are subject to minimal wave energy. Collectively they are 350 x 50 m in plan view and 2 m high. The surface is very well cemented, which requires a hammer and chisel for sampling. Samples were collected from six sites at various locations of the dredge pile. Samples were analyzed for both chemical and physical properties using thin-section examination, X-ray diffraction, X-ray fluorescence, bulk density measurements, isotopic analyses, and scanning electron microscopy.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of Elements in Sedimentary Rocks of the Colorado Plateau a Preliminary Report
    Distribution of Elements in Sedimentary Rocks of the Colorado Plateau A Preliminary Report GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1107-F Prepared on behalf of the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission Distribution of Elements in Sedimentary Rocks of the Colorado Plateau A Preliminary Report By WILLIAM L. NEWMAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE GEOLOGY OF URANIUM GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1107-F Prepared on behalf of the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE. WASHINGTON : 1962 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D.G. CONTENTS Page Abstract____________________________-__-__-_---_-___-___ 337 Introduction ______________________________________________________ 339 Physical features of sedimentary rocks------_--__----_------------__- 339 Precambrian sedimentary rocks.________________________________ 341 Cambrian system____________________________________________ 342 Ordovician system..___________________________________________ 344 Devonian system._____________________________________________ 344 Mississippian system.._________________________________________ 346 Pennsylvanian system________________________________________ 346 Permian system _______________________________________________ 349 Triassic system______________________________________________ 352 Moenkopi formation _______________________________________ 352 Chinle formation..._______________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogeology of Wales
    Hydrogeology of Wales N S Robins and J Davies Contributors D A Jones, Natural Resources Wales and G Farr, British Geological Survey This report was compiled from articles published in Earthwise on 11 February 2016 http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php/Category:Hydrogeology_of_Wales BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY The National Grid and other Ordnance Survey data © Crown Copyright and database rights 2015. Hydrogeology of Wales Ordnance Survey Licence No. 100021290 EUL. N S Robins and J Davies Bibliographical reference Contributors ROBINS N S, DAVIES, J. 2015. D A Jones, Natural Rsources Wales and Hydrogeology of Wales. British G Farr, British Geological Survey Geological Survey Copyright in materials derived from the British Geological Survey’s work is owned by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) and/or the authority that commissioned the work. You may not copy or adapt this publication without first obtaining permission. Contact the BGS Intellectual Property Rights Section, British Geological Survey, Keyworth, e-mail [email protected]. You may quote extracts of a reasonable length without prior permission, provided a full acknowledgement is given of the source of the extract. Maps and diagrams in this book use topography based on Ordnance Survey mapping. Cover photo: Llandberis Slate Quarry, P802416 © NERC 2015. All rights reserved KEYWORTH, NOTTINGHAM BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 2015 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY The full range of our publications is available from BGS British Geological Survey offices shops at Nottingham, Edinburgh, London and Cardiff (Welsh publications only) see contact details below or BGS Central Enquiries Desk shop online at www.geologyshop.com Tel 0115 936 3143 Fax 0115 936 3276 email [email protected] The London Information Office also maintains a reference collection of BGS publications, including Environmental Science Centre, Keyworth, maps, for consultation.
    [Show full text]
  • Strength Developed from Carbonate Cementation in Silica-Carbonate Base Course Materials
    24 TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD 1190 Strength Developed from Carbonate Cementation in Silica-Carbonate Base Course Materials ROBIN E. GRAVES, JAMES L. EADES, AND LARRY L. SMITH Strength increases resulting Crom carbonate cementalion in are depleted, new sources must be found to accommodate compacted sands and cemented coquina highway base course the transportation needs of the state's rapidly expanding materials or variable quartz-calcite composition were investi­ population. Materials obtained from the newer quarries gated lhrough the use of limerock-bearing-ratio (LBR) le ting. often have a different mineralogical composition because Q uart~ and calcite sands were mixed in various proportion , of the great variability of geologic conditions affecting their compacted into LBR mold , oaked for time periods from 2 deposition. days up to 60 days, and tested to determine stt·ength increase with time. For comparison, cemented coquina highway base This has been the case with cemented coquina base course course materials of variable quartz-calcite composition were materials in Florida (3). Currently mined cemented coquina also compacted soaked, and tested. Jn addition duplicate sets contains abundant quartz sand, often resulting in carbon­ or specimens were te tcd that had 1 percent Ca(OH}i, (hydrated ate compositions below the 50 percent required by FDOT. lime) mixed with the dry materials before compacting and The quartz occurs in two forms. Some is incorporated into soaking. This was done to provide a om·ce of' CaH ions for cemented limestone rock, but most exists as unconsoli­ formation of additional calcium carbonate cement. Re ul~ of the LBR testing program showed that more strength developed dated quartz sand.
    [Show full text]
  • Yanawant: Paiute Places and Landscapes in the Arizona Strip
    Yanawant Paiute Places and Landscapes in the Arizona Strip Volume Two OfOfOf The Arizona Strip Landscapes and Place Name Study Prepared by Diane Austin Erin Dean Justin Gaines December 12, 2005 Yanawant Paiute Places and Landscapes in the Arizona Strip Volume Two Of The Arizona Strip Landscapes and Place Name Study Prepared for Bureau of Land Management, Arizona Strip Field Office St. George, Utah Prepared by: Diane Austin Erin Dean Justin Gaines Report of work carried out under contract number #AAA000011TOAAF030023 2 Table of Contents Preface……………………………………………………………………………………………ii i Chapter One: Southern Paiute History on the Arizona Strip………………………………...1 Introduction.............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Early Southern Paiute Contact with Europeans and Euroamericans ........................... 5 1.2 Southern Paiutes and Mormons ........................................................................................ 8 1.3 The Second Powell Expedition......................................................................................... 13 1.4 An Onslaught of Cattle and Further Mormon Expansion............................................ 16 1.5 Interactions in the First Half of the 20 th Century ......................................................... 26 Chapter Two: Southern Paiute Place Names On and Near the Arizona Strip 37 Introduction ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]