Supplement to the London Gazette Extraordinary, 7 February, 1952

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

SUPPLEMENT TO THE LONDON GAZETTE EXTRAORDINARY, 7 FEBRUARY, 1952 Herbert Morrison.,. Tmyers Humphreys. '' ' John Beaumont. ." :-: Percy Loraine. Alfred Barnes. ... Pakehham. Hall. ..-. • Henry Willink. Morrison. •F. .A., Newsam. Arthur Woodbum: ''••A\ Fadden. Leslie Boyce. H. 4., Strutt. Broadbridge. Oliver Lyttelton. George Wilkinson. Cherwell. John Laurie. Peter • Thorneycroft. Frank Newson-Smith. Shajtesbury. Bracewell Smith. Hankey. Frederick Wells. -B^ssborough. F. Rowland. R. H. Dorman-Smith. Denys Lowson. .. ^ G. A. Brown. Gerald Dodson. ,: Tom Williams. Rupert De la Bere.'' " jowitt-:' -•' Cuthbert L. Ackrqyd. Edith Summerskill. F. Tidbury-Beer. Porter. G. •/: Cullum Welch. Bruce. / -: 5. Haroid'Gillett. - - , Morton of Henryton. Edmund V. M. Stockdale. De Ulsre & Dudley. ~'~ William. Mabane. E. Calcott Pryce. Halifax. Bernard N. Waley-Cohen. Templewood. F. A. Hoare. Ernest Brown. Denis H. Truscott. Andrew R* Duncan. C. James Harmon. Pethick-Lawrence. Irving B. Gone. William Whiteley. Anthony Pickford. Felix Cassel. Desmond Heap. .Frederick Sykes. A. E. Young. Charles Waterhouse. Leslie C. Bowker. Richard Law. C. B. Sanders. Florence Horsbrugh. Harold Macmillan. Stanhope. Wilmot of Selmeston. Ralph Assheton. Thomas White. Winterton. Citrine. Douglas Jay. L. S. Amery. Killearn. F. W. Doidge. De La Warr. E.A.P. Wijeyeratne. Duncan Sandys. Henderson. G. A. Isaacs. Stansgate. Cuthbert Headlam. G. R. Bellew, Garter. Arthur Greenwood, Osbert Peake. John Wheatley. Silkin. James Stuart. Alfred Robens. Walter E. Elliot. Ismay. Anthony Eden. Alan Lennqx-Boyd. Neville Leigh. David Eccles. Philip Noel-Baker. Selwyn Lloyd. Walter Monckton. Hilary A. Marquand. Donald Somervell. R. A. Butler. Charles Hodson. Hardinge of Penshurst. Antony Head. Merriman. Courthope. K. M. Goodenough. Asquith of Bishopstone. Howe. Percivale Liesching. Home. Habib I. Rahimtoola. Raymond Evershed. Mountbatten of Burma. W. Nash. Arthur Salter. Harold Wilson. Tom Dugdale. Hugh Dalton. Salisbury. Aneurin Sevan. Walter Womersley. Frank Soskice. Listowel. Clarendon. John W. Morris. Gowrie. Geoffrey Shakespeare. Malcolm McCorquodale. Geoffrey Lloyd. Emanuel Shinwell. Vincent Massey. D.R. Grenfell. Stanmore. Drogheda. • -Oaksey. • . Hudson. Lionel Leach. Hugh Gaitskell..

Copy Link

Recommended publications

The Attlee Governments
Vic07 10/15/03 2:11 PM Page 159 Chapter 7 The Attlee governments The election of a majority Labour government in 1945 generated great excitement on the left. Hugh Dalton described how ‘That first sensa- tion, tingling and triumphant, was of a new society to be built. There was exhilaration among us, joy and hope, determination and confi- dence. We felt exalted, dedication, walking on air, walking with destiny.’1 Dalton followed this by aiding Herbert Morrison in an attempt to replace Attlee as leader of the PLP.2 This was foiled by the bulky protection of Bevin, outraged at their plotting and disloyalty. Bevin apparently hated Morrison, and thought of him as ‘a scheming little bastard’.3 Certainly he thought Morrison’s conduct in the past had been ‘devious and unreliable’.4 It was to be particularly irksome for Bevin that it was Morrison who eventually replaced him as Foreign Secretary in 1951. The Attlee government not only generated great excitement on the left at the time, but since has also attracted more attention from academics than any other period of Labour history. Foreign policy is a case in point. The foreign policy of the Attlee government is attractive to study because it spans so many politically and historically significant issues. To start with, this period was unique in that it was the first time that there was a majority Labour government in British political history, with a clear mandate and programme of reform. Whereas the two minority Labour governments of the inter-war period had had to rely on support from the Liberals to pass legislation, this time Labour had power as well as office.
[Show full text]
The British Labour Party and Zionism, 1917-1947 / by Fred Lennis Lepkin
THE BRITISH LABOUR PARTY AND ZIONISM: 1917 - 1947 FRED LENNIS LEPKIN BA., University of British Columbia, 196 1 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in the Department of History @ Fred Lepkin 1986 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY July 1986 All rights reserved. This thesis may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without permission of the author. Name : Fred Lennis Lepkin Degree: M. A. Title of thesis: The British Labour Party and Zionism, - Examining Committee: J. I. Little, Chairman Allan B. CudhgK&n, ior Supervisor . 5- - John Spagnolo, ~upervis&y6mmittee Willig Cleveland, Supepiso$y Committee -Lenard J. Cohen, External Examiner, Associate Professor, Political Science Dept.,' Simon Fraser University Date Approved: August 11, 1986 PARTIAL COPYRIGHT LICENSE I hereby grant to Simon Fraser University the right to lend my thesis, project or extended essay (the title of which is shown below) to users of the Simon Fraser University Library, and to make partial or single copies only for such users or in response to a request from the library of any other university, or other educational institution, on its own behalf or for one of its users. I further agree that permission for multiple copying of this work for scholarly purposes may be granted by me or the Dean of Graduate Studies. It is understood that copying or publication of this work for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Title of Thesis/Project/Extended Essay The British Labour Party and Zionism, 1917 - 1947.
[Show full text]
'The Left's Views on Israel: from the Establishment of the Jewish State To
‘The Left’s Views on Israel: From the establishment of the Jewish state to the intifada’ Thesis submitted by June Edmunds for PhD examination at the London School of Economics and Political Science 1 UMI Number: U615796 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U615796 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 F 7377 POLITI 58^S8i ABSTRACT The British left has confronted a dilemma in forming its attitude towards Israel in the postwar period. The establishment of the Jewish state seemed to force people on the left to choose between competing nationalisms - Israeli, Arab and later, Palestinian. Over time, a number of key developments sharpened the dilemma. My central focus is the evolution of thinking about Israel and the Middle East in the British Labour Party. I examine four critical periods: the creation of Israel in 1948; the Suez war in 1956; the Arab-Israeli war of 1967 and the 1980s, covering mainly the Israeli invasion of Lebanon but also the intifada. In each case, entrenched attitudes were called into question and longer-term shifts were triggered in the aftermath.
[Show full text]
Arguing for the Death Penalty: Making the Retentionist Case in Britain, 1945-1979
Arguing for the Death Penalty: Making the Retentionist Case in Britain, 1945-1979 Thomas James Wright MA University of York Department of History September 2010 Abstract There is a small body of historiography that analyses the abolition of capital punishment in Britain. There has been no detailed study of those who opposed abolition and no history of the entire post-war abolition process from the Criminal Justice Act 1948 to permanent abolition in 1969. This thesis aims to fill this gap by establishing the role and impact of the retentionists during the abolition process between the years 1945 and 1979. This thesis is structured around the main relevant Acts, Bills, amendments and reports and looks briefly into the retentionist campaign after abolition became permanent in December 1969. The only historians to have written in any detail on abolition are Victor Bailey and Mark Jarvis, who have published on the years 1945 to 1951 and 1957 to 1964 respectively. The subject was discussed in some detail in the early 1960s by the American political scientists James Christoph and Elizabeth Tuttle. Through its discussion of capital punishment this thesis develops the themes of civilisation and the permissive society, which were important to the abolition discourse. Abolition was a process that was controlled by the House of Commons. The general public had a negligible impact on the decisions made by MPs during the debates on the subject. For this reason this thesis priorities Parliamentary politics over popular action. This marks a break from the methodology of the new political histories that study „low‟ and „high‟ politics in the same depth.
[Show full text]
Orme) Wilberforce (Albert) Raymond Blackburn (Alexander Bell
Copyrights sought (Albert) Basil (Orme) Wilberforce (Albert) Raymond Blackburn (Alexander Bell) Filson Young (Alexander) Forbes Hendry (Alexander) Frederick Whyte (Alfred Hubert) Roy Fedden (Alfred) Alistair Cooke (Alfred) Guy Garrod (Alfred) James Hawkey (Archibald) Berkeley Milne (Archibald) David Stirling (Archibald) Havergal Downes-Shaw (Arthur) Berriedale Keith (Arthur) Beverley Baxter (Arthur) Cecil Tyrrell Beck (Arthur) Clive Morrison-Bell (Arthur) Hugh (Elsdale) Molson (Arthur) Mervyn Stockwood (Arthur) Paul Boissier, Harrow Heraldry Committee & Harrow School (Arthur) Trevor Dawson (Arwyn) Lynn Ungoed-Thomas (Basil Arthur) John Peto (Basil) Kingsley Martin (Basil) Kingsley Martin (Basil) Kingsley Martin & New Statesman (Borlasse Elward) Wyndham Childs (Cecil Frederick) Nevil Macready (Cecil George) Graham Hayman (Charles Edward) Howard Vincent (Charles Henry) Collins Baker (Charles) Alexander Harris (Charles) Cyril Clarke (Charles) Edgar Wood (Charles) Edward Troup (Charles) Frederick (Howard) Gough (Charles) Michael Duff (Charles) Philip Fothergill (Charles) Philip Fothergill, Liberal National Organisation, N-E Warwickshire Liberal Association & Rt Hon Charles Albert McCurdy (Charles) Vernon (Oldfield) Bartlett (Charles) Vernon (Oldfield) Bartlett & World Review of Reviews (Claude) Nigel (Byam) Davies (Claude) Nigel (Byam) Davies (Colin) Mark Patrick (Crwfurd) Wilfrid Griffin Eady (Cyril) Berkeley Ormerod (Cyril) Desmond Keeling (Cyril) George Toogood (Cyril) Kenneth Bird (David) Euan Wallace (Davies) Evan Bedford (Denis Duncan)
[Show full text]
Trade-Union Policy Between the Wars the Case of Holidays with Pay in Britain*
STEPHEN G. JONES TRADE-UNION POLICY BETWEEN THE WARS THE CASE OF HOLIDAYS WITH PAY IN BRITAIN* Most standard histories of Britain between the wars refer to the develop- ment of holidays with pay, albeit briefly. It is widely acknowledged that by the end of the 1930's the majority of the British working population benefited from a paid holiday. The crucial initiative, so it is claimed, was the Holidays with Pay Act of 1938, which gave Parliamentary approval to the principle of payment of wages during holidays.1 Clearly the growth of paid holidays is seen as yet another instance of a more affluent Britain, an integral element of the growth of leisure.2 However, there has been very little detailed discussion of the paid-holiday-policy option and the precise reasons for the formulation and implementation of that policy. This neglect is rather surprising given the popular support for this "fringe benefit", which was perceived as providing a certain degree of financial security during the annual break from the rigours of work. It is true that there has been more specialised treatment, but even this is of a general nature, with little reference to the industrial and political struggle for holidays with pay.3 * I would like to thank Dr M. E. Rose, Professor A. E. Musson and members of the Editorial Board for their helpful comments. 1 See C. L. Mowat, Britain Between the Wars 1918-1940 (London, 1955), p. 501; D. H. Aldcroft, The Inter-War Economy: Britain, 1919-1939 (London, 1970), p. 366; N. Branson and M.
[Show full text]
The Following Telegram Was Sent Today by Mr. Arthur Greenwood, Minister
. No. 1. MR. ARTHUR GREENWOOD'S MESSAGE TO SEAMEN'S UNION. The following telegram was sent today by Mr. Arthur Greenwood, Minister Without Portfolio, to a meeting of the National Union of Seamen at Brighton!- Deeply regret unable to be with you today. I pay my tribute to the magnificent courage and fortitude of the Mercantile Marine. I feel confident that it will continue to play its full part in the grim struggle on which we are engaged. There is a grave call to-day to all our people to gird themselves for a mighty effort in order that victory shall be swift and sure,. 1REASURY.. 1 1 J'·l O J'\ !- • nu1lJ _ .r I..J E: -''J. ]·~ l'··T l J\j·- -o • 726 ,, _._ ___ ..._ ~-- - ------- The Air Ministry regrets to ~nnounce the following cauuulties on vari ous aates:- KILLED_J_~ACTION. ADAMS 27100 Flying Officer w.s.c. BEAUMONT 5521J,.L~3 Aircraf tmo.n 2nd Class O.Ro CI-IARL E '110 N 628854 Aircrnftman 1st Class R .. ECHLIN 77117 Pilot Officer R.W.H. JOHNSON 39533 Flying Officer N. PICKARD 539009 Aircro.ftman 1st Class J.G. ROONEY 541-i-996 Loading Aircraftman J. SKELTON 29147 Fli ght Lieutenant G.F.A. VAGG 70825 Pilot Officer E.A. WEBB 4315Ll, Pilot Officer H.G. WOLSTENHO LME 5801-i-46 Sergeant D. HAITHWAITE 524167 Sergeant N. HAYES 580893 Sergeant J.F. HORRIGAN 39525 Flying Officer OoGo WHITLEY 632190 Aircraftrnnn 2nd Class C.C. 1!1/0UNDED OR INJURED IN ACTION. BARRON 580276 Sergeant H.. J.
[Show full text]
Economists' Papers 1750-2000
ECONOMISTS’PAPERS 1750 - 2000 A Guide to Archive and other Manuscript Sources for the History of British and Irish Economic Thought. ELECTRONIC EDITION ….the ideas of economists and political philosophers, both when they are right and when they are wrong, are more powerful than is commonly understood. Indeed the“ world is ruled by little else. “Practical men, who believe themselves to be quite exempt from any intellectual influences, are usually the slaves of some defunct economist.’ John Maynard Keynes’s General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money (1936) ECONOMISTS’ PAPERS 1750-2000 THE COMMITTEE OF THE GUIDE TO ARCHIVE SOURCES IN THE HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT IN 1975 R.D. COLLISON BLACK Professor of Economics The Queen’s University of Belfast A.W. COATS Professor of Economic and Social History University of Nottingham B.A. CORRY Professor of Economics Queen Mary College, London (now deceased) R.H. ELLIS formerly Secretary of the Royal Commission on Historical Manuscripts LORD ROBBINS formerly Professor of Economics University of London (now deceased) D.N. WINCH Professor of Economics University of Sussex ECONOMISTS' PAPERS 1750-2000 A Guide to Archive and other Manuscript Sources for the History of British and Irish Economic Thought Originally compiled by R. P. STURGES for the Committee of the Guide to Archive Sources in the History of Economic Thought, and now revised and expanded by SUSAN K. HOWSON, DONALD E. MOGGRIDGE, AND DONALD WINCH with the assistance of AZHAR HUSSAIN and the support of the ROYAL ECONOMIC SOCIETY © Royal Economic Society 1975 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without permission.
[Show full text]
The British Council of Industrial Design Lesley Whitworth
Inscribing Design on the Nation: The Creators of the British Council of Industrial Design Lesley Whitworth This article is derived from a larger study of the consumer education work of the Council of Industrial Design, founded in Britain in 1944. My particular aim is to develop a convincing account of the personal interactions that propelled the Council into existence following decades of relative inertia around the issue of industrial design, which was viewed as significant, but had so far failed to achieve the prominence associated with a dedicated state-aided body. In so doing, I stress the importance of the presence of individuals drawn from the worlds of business into the administration of the wartime state. The introduction to the 2005 Business History Conference in Minneapolis referred to the way in which, “Throughout history, firms, industries, regions, and nations have demonstrated remarkable capacities to transform prevailing business practices and reorient economic activities.”1 The achievements of wartime states are a case in point, and those of the British state under duress have attracted a considerable body of commentary. In response to the theme of “Reinvention and Renewal,” however, in this article I bring forward material related to the creation of a seldom-referenced body intended to have a pronounced effect on material conditions and prevailing industrial practices in the post-1945 world. Brought into being in the waning moments of World War II by Britain’s I acknowledge the award (RES-143-25-0037-R0536) made by the Economic and Social Research Council with the Arts and Humanities Research Council, which underpins my project in the “Cultures of Consumption” research program (see http://www.consume.bbk.ac.uk).
[Show full text]
Oxford, 1984); H
Notes Notes to the Introduction I. K. O. Morgan, Labour in Power, 194~1951 (Oxford, 1984); H. Pelling, The Labour Governments, 194~51 (London, 1984); A. Cairncross, Years of Recovery: British Economic Policy, 194~51 (London, 1985); P. Hen nessy, Never Again: Britain, 194~1951 (London, 1992). 2. J. Saville, The Labour Movement in Britain (London, 1988); J. Fyrth (ed.), Labour's High Noon: The Government and the Economy, 194~51 (London, 1993). 3. C. Barnett, The Audit oj War: The Illusion and Reality of Britain as a Great Nation (London, 1986); The Lost Victory: British Dreams, British Realities, 194~1950 (London, 1995). 4. Symposium, 'Britain's Postwar Industrial Decline', Contemporary Record, 1: 2 (1987), pp. 11-19; N. Tiratsoo (ed.), The Altlee Years (London, 1991). 5. J. Tomlinson, 'Welfare and the Economy: The Economic Impact of the Welfare State, 1945-1951', Twentieth-Century British History, 6: 2 (1995), pp. 194--219. 6. Hennessy, Never Again, p. 453. See also M. Francis, 'Economics and Ethics: the Nature of Labour's Socialism, 1945-1951', Twentieth Century British History, 6: 2 (1995), pp. 220--43. 7. S. Fielding, P. Thompson and N. Tiratsoo, 'England Arise!' The Labour Party and Popular Politics in 1940s Britain (Manchester, 1995), pp. 209- 18. 8. P. Kellner, 'It Wasn't All Right,Jack', Sunday Times, 4 April 1993. See also The Guardian, 9 September 1993. 9. For a summary of the claims made by the political parties, see J. Barnes and A. Seldon, '1951-64: 13 W asted Years?', Contemporary Record, 1: 2 (1987). 10. V. Bogdanor and R.
[Show full text]
Labour and the Politics of Alcohol: the Decline of a Cause
Labour and the politics of alcohol: The decline of a cause A report produced for the Institute of Alcohol Studies By Dr Peter Catterall University of Westminster September 2014 About the Author Peter Catterall is Reader in History at the University of Westminster and Chair of the George Lansbury Memorial Trust. He has written extensively on modern British politiCal history, and is Currently Completing a book on RadiCalism, Righteousness and Religion: Labour and the Free Churches 1918-1939, to be published by Bloomsbury. Please note that the views expressed in this paper are those of the author and do not represent the views of the Institute of AlCohol Studies Institute of AlCohol Studies AllianCe House 12 Caxton Street London SW1H 0QS LABOUR AND THE POLITICS OF ALCOHOL: THE DECLINE OF A CAUSE1 Dr Peter Catterall, University of Westminster The index to James Nicholls’ recent survey of the history of the drink question in England to the present day contains precisely no references to the Labour Party.2 Anxiety to curb the deleterious effects of alcohol is presented therein largely as a Liberal preserve. He is not alone in overlooking the importance of the drink question in the early history of the Labour Party. Even John Greenaway’s analysis of the high politics of alcohol since 1830 only briefly discusses Labour’s attitude to the subject, and then primarily in terms of intra- party divisions.3 Many Labour historians have also largely written the subject out of the Party’s history. There is only brief mention of ‘fringe issues like temperance’
[Show full text]
British War Cabinet
British War Cabinet Dear Delegates to the British War Cabinet, Welcome to the British War Cabinet (BWC) and University of Michigan Model United Nations Conference (UMMUN). I would like to extend a special welcome to those of you new to UMMUN. This committee will hopefully prove to be very exciting because of the dynamics and, of course, you, the delegates. This year, we have decided to create a new committee to fit the growing needs of delegates. You will be asked to tackle difficult situations quickly and keep your wits about you. Also, with no set topic, I expect each delegate to be well-versed in the person he or she represents as well as his or her powers and areas expertise. I do not expect you to become experts, but I do expect you to know what information you should know so that it may be called upon, if needed. This is a small committee, and as such, I will expect you all to be very active during the conference. I have a great staff this year. Dana Chidiac is my Assitant Director. She is a second year student concentrating in English. My name is Nicole Mazur. I am a fourth year student at UM, double concentrating in Political Science and Communications. My model UN career began when I got to college and have since been to conferences at University of Pennsylvania, Harvard University, University of Chicago, McGill University, and Georgetown University. Last year for UMMUN, I was the Director of the United States National Security Council. If you have any questions, please feel free to email me.
[Show full text]