2017–2018 Annual Research Report
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Strategic Priorities 2017–2030: Reissued 2020
INSPIRING FUTURES STRATEGIC PRIORITIES 2017–2030: REISSUED 2020 INSPIRING FUTURES: STRATEGIC PRIORITIES 2017–2030: REISSUED 2020 INSPIRING FUTURES: STRATEGIC PRIORITIES 2017–2030: REISSUED 2020 CONTENTS Note on 2020 reissue PREFACE 4 This long-term strategy was first published in 2017 as the culmination of FOREWORD 6 a rigorous process that began in 2015. It is a living document and the need for INTRODUCTION 8 review and adaptation before 2030 was acknowledged from the start. A formal STRATEGIC PRIORITIES commitment to review the strategic priorities after no less than five years is built in (p12) and will fall in 2022. But Rising priorities at 2020 12 the progress we have already made in realising our mission to inspire futures, Grow science capital in 16 and the fast pace of change within the individuals and society Group and the external environment, have led us to this interim review and Grow our audiences and 20 refresh of the original document. exceed their expectations Inspiring Futures was always conceived as an overarching framework, not Sustain and grow our 24 a straitjacket. It continues to be a world-class collection touchstone for our planning and activities, with a focus on the seven Extend our international reach 28 strategic priorities. In refreshing the document for this edition, we have Transform our estate 33 kept changes to a minimum. Mostly, changes are updating, as follows: Harness the potential of digital 36 - Changes to titles of people, organisations and initiatives Increase income 39 - Revision of numbers and data, where more recent data was MONITORING PROGRESS 42 available, including the information boxes containing charts, tables and lists in each strategic priority section - Addition of some recent activity and plans In addition, we are addressing other significant areas that have moved up the Group’s agenda since 2017 and that we anticipate will be more comprehensively articulated in the next phase of Inspiring Futures from 2022. -
Touring Exhibitions and Consultanc Y
TOURING EXHIBITIONS AND CONSULTANCY ABOUT US Touring Exhibitions Consultancy Inspiring exhibitions from across our The Science Museum Group is pleased to sites are available to hire and display at offer consultancy services to museums your venue. Since 2014, our exhibitions and science centres both in the UK and have been displayed in 39 countries. internationally. Our experienced team draws from the expertise within the Group’s We tour three types of exhibition: world-leading alliance of science museums Turnkey exhibitions to provide a range of advice and training We provide all the physical assets on many aspects of museum activity and required for the exhibition, including operation. Current consultancy projects objects, cases, set-works, audiovisual include supporting the delivery of unique and lighting equipment. interactive galleries and strategic analysis of existing organisations to pinpoint Curated collections opportunities and inform future planning. We provide a collection of objects and interpretation that you can adapt into [email protected] your own display. Exhibition Blueprint Packs Virtual reality licensing We provide digital assets, including Join astronaut Tim Peake in a thrilling content, IP, designs, videos, interviews, high-speed spaceflight in a new virtual programming ideas and information reality experience, created by the for sourcing objects, enabling you to award-winning Alchemy VR for the produce your own tailored contemporary Science Museum Group. The 13-minute science exhibition. experience runs on Samsung’s Gear VR platform and gives the public a unique [email protected] opportunity to experience the 360-degree 3D view from inside a Soyuz spacecraft as it makes the dangerous 400 km journey back to Earth from the International Space Station, slowing from a speed in orbit of 25,000 km/h to land safely in Kazakhstan. -
The Future of the Science Museum Group
House of Commons Culture, Media and Sport Committee The Future of the Science Museum Group Oral and written evidence 2 July 2013 Mr Edward Vaizey MP, Ian Blatchford, Tony Reeves, Kersten England and Vicky Rosin Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 2 July 2013 HC 507-i Published on 31 January 2014 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £11.50 The Culture, Media and Sport Committee The Culture, Media and Sport Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration and policy of the Department for Culture, Media and Sport and its associated public bodies. Current membership Mr John Whittingdale MP (Conservative, Maldon) (Chair) Mr Ben Bradshaw MP (Labour, Exeter) Angie Bray MP (Conservative, Ealing Central and Acton) Conor Burns MP (Conservative, Bournemouth West) Tracey Crouch MP (Conservative, Chatham and Aylesford) Philip Davies MP (Conservative, Shipley) Paul Farrelly MP (Labour, Newcastle-under-Lyme) Mr John Leech MP (Liberal Democrat, Manchester, Withington) Steve Rotheram MP (Labour, Liverpool, Walton) Jim Sheridan MP (Labour, Paisley and Renfrewshire North) Mr Gerry Sutcliffe MP (Labour, Bradford South) The following members were also a member of the committee during the parliament: David Cairns MP (Labour, Inverclyde) Dr Thérèse Coffey MP (Conservative, Suffolk Coastal) Damian Collins MP (Conservative, Folkestone and Hythe) Alan Keen MP (Labour Co-operative, Feltham and Heston) Louise Mensch MP (Conservative, Corby) Mr Adrian Sanders MP (Liberal Democrat, Torbay) Mr Tom Watson MP (Labour, West Bromwich East) Powers The committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. -
Historical Group
Historical Group NEWSLETTER and SUMMARY OF PAPERS No. 64 Summer 2013 Registered Charity No. 207890 COMMITTEE Chairman: Prof A T Dronsfield | Prof J Betteridge (Twickenham, 4, Harpole Close, Swanwick, Derbyshire, | Middlesex) DE55 1EW | Dr N G Coley (Open University) [e-mail [email protected]] | Dr C J Cooksey (Watford, Secretary: Prof. J. W. Nicholson | Hertfordshire) School of Sport, Health and Applied Science, | Prof E Homburg (University of St Mary's University College, Waldegrave | Maastricht) Road, Twickenham, Middlesex, TW1 4SX | Prof F James (Royal Institution) [e-mail: [email protected]] | Dr D Leaback (Biolink Technology) Membership Prof W P Griffith | Dr P J T Morris (Science Museum) Secretary: Department of Chemistry, Imperial College, | Mr P N Reed (Steensbridge, South Kensington, London, SW7 2AZ | Herefordshire) [e-mail [email protected]] | Dr V Quirke (Oxford Brookes Treasurer: Dr J A Hudson | University) Graythwaite, Loweswater, Cockermouth, | Prof. H. Rzepa (Imperial College) Cumbria, CA13 0SU | Dr. A Sella (University College) [e-mail [email protected]] Newsletter Dr A Simmons Editor Epsom Lodge, La Grande Route de St Jean, St John, Jersey, JE3 4FL [e-mail [email protected]] Newsletter Dr G P Moss Production: School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS [e-mail [email protected]] http://www.chem.qmul.ac.uk/rschg/ http://www.rsc.org/membership/networking/interestgroups/historical/index.asp 1 RSC Historical Group Newsletter No. 64 Summer 2013 Contents From the Editor 2 Obituaries 3 Professor Colin Russell (1928-2013) Peter J.T. -
Annual Report on the BBC 2019/20
Ofcom’s Annual Report on the BBC 2019/20 Published 25 November 2020 Raising awarenessWelsh translation available: Adroddiad Blynyddol Ofcom ar y BBC of online harms Contents Overview .................................................................................................................................... 2 The ongoing impact of Covid-19 ............................................................................................... 6 Looking ahead .......................................................................................................................... 11 Performance assessment ......................................................................................................... 16 Public Purpose 1: News and current affairs ........................................................................ 24 Public Purpose 2: Supporting learning for people of all ages ............................................ 37 Public Purpose 3: Creative, high quality and distinctive output and services .................... 47 Public Purpose 4: Reflecting, representing and serving the UK’s diverse communities .... 60 The BBC’s impact on competition ............................................................................................ 83 The BBC’s content standards ................................................................................................... 89 Overview of our duties ............................................................................................................ 96 1 Overview This is our third -
Complaint to the Science Museum Group
COMPLAINT TO THE SCIENCE MUSEUM GROUP STATEMENT OF SUPPORT This formal complaint, compiled by Culture Unstained and supported by the undersigned, outlines how the Science Museum Group’s corporate partnerships with the fossil fuel companies BP, Shell and Statoil undermine its integrity as a scientific institution and are in conflict with both the museum’s own Group Ethics Policy and relevant policies governing the wider museums sector. On its website, the Science Museum Group highlights how a corporate partnership with the museum will allow companies to ‘demonstrate their commitment to addressing some of the most urgent scientific challenges of our time’. But even though these three companies have been aware of the urgent challenge of global warming for decades, they have all demonstrated through the ongoing pursuit of new sources of fossil fuels incompatible with meaningful climate change mitigation that they are unwilling to respond in a constructive way to the scientific consensus on climate change. Furthermore, these companies have often worked to undermine action in line with that scientific consensus, by supporting the spread of disinformation, lobbying against environmental regulations and opposing clean energy solutions that would threaten their ongoing interests in fossil fuels. By associating with the Science Museum Group, these companies hope to gain a ‘social license to operate’; a perception among both policy-makers and the wider public that they are responsible companies engaged in activities that respect people and the environment, and that they are in alignment with the scientific consensus on climate change and, by extension, the goals set out in the Paris Climate Agreement. -
Guidance for Applicants
Guidance for applicants The British Academy, Royal Academy of Engineering and A full list of the disciplines covered by the Academies can the Royal Society are three of five Designated Competent be found in the ‘Guidance on Policy for UK visas under Tier Bodies (DCBs) appointed by the Home Office to assess 1 (Exceptional Talent)’ document available on the Home applications for the Research and Innovation Talent Visa Office website. under the Home Office Tier 1 (Exceptional Talent) Visa route. Holders of a Research and Innovation Talent Visa that were As DCBs, the Academies are responsible for considering endorsed through Exceptional Talent are eligible to apply whether an individual who makes an application for settlement (Indefinite Leave to Remain) after three years. is demonstrably ‘exceptionally talented’ or has Holders endorsed through Exceptional Promise are eligible ‘exceptional promise’. after five years. Tier 1 (Exceptional Talent) is subject to a limit of 2,000 visas per year (beginning on 6 April one year and ending on 5 April the following year). The Academies assess applications in the following areas and are allocated a minumum number of endorsements by the Home Office from the total annual pool. • The British Academy – for humanities and social sciences (150 endorsements); • The Royal Society – for natural sciences and medical science research (250 endorsements); • The Royal Academy of Engineering – for engineering (150 endorsements). TIER 1 APPLICATION GUIDANCE 1 Overview of the application process The application for a Research & Innovation Talent visa Should the decision be upheld then the process ends here. (Tier 1 Exceptional Talent) is in two stages: You can still apply via another visa route or re-apply to this route with revised supporting evidence. -
UNIVERSITY of CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL EXAMINATIONS Cambridge International Level 3 Pre-U Certificate Principal Subject
UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL EXAMINATIONS Cambridge International Level 3 Pre-U Certificate Principal Subject PHYSICS 9792/02 Paper 2 Part A Written Paper May/June 2012 PRE-RELEASED MATERIAL The question in Section B of Paper 2 will relate to the subject matter in these extracts. You should read through this booklet before the examination. The extracts on the following pages are taken from a variety of sources. University of Cambridge International Examinations does not necessarily endorse the reasoning expressed by the original authors, some of whom may use unconventional Physics terminology and non-SI units. You are also encouraged to read around the topic, and to consider the issues raised, so that you can draw on all your knowledge of Physics when answering the questions. You will be provided with a copy of this booklet in the examination. This document consists of 8 printed pages. DC (LEO/JG) 51113/1 © UCLES 2012 [Turn over 2 Extract 1: How Maglev Trains Work If you’ve been to an airport lately, you’ve probably noticed that air travel is becoming more and more congested. Despite frequent delays, aeroplanes still provide the fastest way to travel hundreds or thousands of miles. Passenger air travel revolutionised the transport industry in the last century, letting people traverse great distances in a matter of hours instead of days or weeks. Fig. E1.1 The first commercial maglev line made its debut in December of 2003. The only alternatives to aeroplanes – feet, cars, buses, boats and conventional trains – are just too slow for today’s fast-paced society. -
Scientific Instrument Curators in Britain: Building a Discipline with Material Culture
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by National Museums Scotland Research Repository Alberti, S J M M (2018) Scientific instrument curators in Britain: building a discipline with material culture. Journal of the History of Collections (fhy027). ISSN 1477-8564 https://doi.org/10.1093/jhc/fhy027 Deposited on: 09 December 2019 NMS Repository – Research publications by staff of the National Museums Scotland http://repository.nms.ac.uk/ Journal of the History of Collections vol. 31 no. 3 (2019) pp. 519–530 Scientific instrument curators in Britain Building a discipline with material culture Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jhc/article-abstract/31/3/519/5077066 by National Museums Scotland user on 09 December 2019 Samuel J.M.M. Alberti From the mid-1960s a new breed of scientific instrument curators emerged in the United Kingdom. This small community of practice developed in parallel to but distinctly from the expanding generation of university historians of science and other cognate museum sub-professions. Presenting the trajectories, experiences and practices of personnel in British scientific instrument collections, especially the Royal Scottish Museum in Edinburgh, this article explores how networks of interest around collections shaped the museum sector in later twentieth-century Britain. With particular objects – especially eighteenth-century instruments – the ‘brass brigade’ built a discipline. On 3 September 1968, sixty curators and other The museum professionals present at the ‘Aspects’ historians gathered at the Royal Scottish Museum meeting formed part of a distinct cohort emerging at in Edinburgh to discuss ‘Aspects of Eighteenth- this time. -
The Jesus College Record 2013
RECOR D 2013 CONTENTS FROM THE EDITOR 3 THE PRINCIPAL’S R EPORT 6 FELLOWS & COLLEGE LECTURERS 12 FELLOWS’ NEWS 20 THE DON FOWLER M EMORIAL LECTURE 2013 26 PRIZES, AWARDS, DOCTORATES & ELECTIONS 27 THE SIGNIFICANCE OF GREAT TITS: AN I NTERVIEW WITH L ORD KREBS 39 INTIMATIONS OF MORTALITY BY NORMAN F RISKNEY 46 TRAVEL AWARDS 47 TRAVEL AWARDS REPORTS 49 SIR FRANCIS M ANSELL: THREE TIMES P RINCIPAL OF JESUS C OLLEGE 55 THE SIRENS’ SONG: REDISCOVERING ANCIENT G REEK MUSIC 61 THE WALL PAINTING IN THE JCR 65 THE DAFFODIL’S VERSION BY DAVID CRAM 68 THE BOOKS OF LORD HERBERT OF CHERBURY 69 THE ACCOMMODATION, CATERING AND CONFERENCES TEAM 72 A YEAR IN THE JCR 75 A YEAR IN THE MCR 76 A YEAR IN DEVELOPMENT 77 A YEAR IN CHAPEL 80 SPORTS REPORTS 82 OLD MEMBERS’ OBITUARIES 88 SELECT PUBLICATIONS 104 HONOURS, AWARDS & QUALIF ICATIONS 112 APPOINTMENTS 115 MARRIAGES & CIVIL PARTNERSHIPS 117 BIRTHS & ADOPTIONS 120 IN MEMORIAM 125 USEFUL INFORMATION 128 MERCHANDISE 134 1 2 FROM THE EDITOR DR ARMAND D’A NGOUR Economy once meant good housekeeping. Then came the political economy, the knowledge economy, and the information economy. Now, it seems, we have the attention economy. The notion, which goes back to the 1990s, is that nowadays people compete for attention as much as for money or knowledge. According to the pundits, attention has become a currency: it has scarcity value and endless attraction. As with money, only the naïve or incapable (or the truly wise) can resist its lure. In the digital age, to be a winner in the attention economy requires constant tweeting, blogging, and updating one’s status on Facebook; a hugely time-consuming business. -
MODERN TRENDS in TRACTION Mr
International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research Volume 12, Issue 1, January-2021 908 ISSN 2229-5518 MODERN TRENDS IN TRACTION Mr. Ankit Aloni Abstract— The modern trend in the railway sector is the Maglev trains. Maglev, also called magnetic levitation train or maglev train, a floating vehi- cle for land transportation that's supported by either electromagnetic attraction or repulsion. The maglev transportation have very benefits such as high level of safety, no derailment, reliability, high speed, ecofriendly, low maintenance fees, energy efficient, the quietest transportation system, less space required, climbing grade and maneuverability, etc. This paper involves all the aspects, design, technology, applications, future uses of these trains. Index Terms— Electrodynamic suspension, Electromagnetic suspension, Inductrack, stability, power-use, magnetic induction —————————— —————————— 1 INTRODUCTION hat if you'll travel from NY to LA in only under seven hours without boarding a plane? It could be 2 HOW MAGLEV WORKS? Wpossible on a Maglev train. This idea was raised by a physics scientist in 1909 by Rob- "A Maglev train vehicle is only a case with magnets on the ert H. Goddard the American rocket scientist. After that a four corners," says Jesse Powell, the child of the Maglev de- British electrical engineer Eric Laithwaite developed the signer. It's a smidgen more unpredictable than that, however first full sized working model of linear motor induction af- the idea is basic. The magnets utilized are superconducting, ter that many scientist came and improved the technology. which implies that when they are cooled to under 450 degrees The world first commercial maglev system was a low- Fahrenheit under zero, they can create attractive fields up to speed maglev shuttle that ran between the airport terminal multiple times more grounded than customary electromag- of Birmingham international airport and Birmingham in- nets, enough to suspend and move a train. -
Maglev and Aérotrain: Why and How Europe Killed Its Own High
MAGLEV AND AÉROTRAIN Why and How Europe Killed Its Own High-Speed Transportation Plans by Karel Vereycken Sept. 29—When considering the breathtaking expansion of high-speed rail networks in China—including its am- bitious plans for the con- struction of maglev sys- tems—it may come as a shock to learn that more than forty years ago, it was Europe that was leading the way in the development of these ad- vanced technologies. France, Germany, Italy and Britain were all pushing the enve- Transrapid lope for the creation of a Transrapid 08 maglev train, at the Emsland Test Facility, in Emsland, Germany. Europe-wide, 21st Century transportation system, and were poised for the develop- why European states scrapped the very best of their na- ment and deployment of maglev and related systems. tional research on the new revolutionary technologies Yet almost all of these efforts were systematically shut that were being spun off from the aerospace programs down. Why? of the Kennedy era. A fresh look at the archives—the 1978 Working As I will demonstrate, the archives indicate that this Papers of the Strasbourg-based Parliamentary Assem- was done, top-down, in great secret, in the name of Eu- bly of the Council of Europe1—provides insights into ropean “unity,” demanding that each nation sacrifice its own scientific contribution, however valuable it might be! 1. The Council of Europe (not to be confused with the European Coun- Typical was the sabotage of the Transrapid, the Ger- cil, on which sit the heads of state and heads of government), is a 47- nation international organization (much larger than the European man-developed high-speed monorail train using mag- Union) dedicated to upholding human rights, democracy and the rule of netic levitation, for which planning started in 1969.