DOCSLIB.ORG

Meetings Minutes from April Council

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Meetings Minutes from April Council 1 GULF OF MEXICO FISHERY MANAGEMENT COUNCIL 2 3 263RD MEETING 4 5 FULL COUNCIL SESSION 6 7 Hyatt Regency Birmingham Birmingham, Alabama 8 9 10 APRIL 5-6, 2017 11 12 VOTING MEMBERS 13 Kevin Anson...............................................Alabama 14 Leann Bosarge.........................................Mississippi 15 Patrick Banks...........................................Louisiana 16 Doug Boyd...................................................Texas 17 Roy Crabtree..................NMFS, SERO, St. Petersburg, Florida 18 Pamela Dana...............................................Florida 19 Dale Diaz.............................................Mississippi 20 Tom Frazer................................................Florida 21 Johnny Greene.............................................Alabama 22 Martha Guyas (designee for Nick Wiley)....................Florida 23 Kelly Lucas (designee for Jamie Miller)...............Mississippi 24 Campo Matens............................................Louisiana 25 Lance Robinson (designee for Robin Riechers)................Texas 26 John Sanchez..............................................Florida 27 Greg Stunz..................................................Texas 28 Ed Swindell.............................................Louisiana 29 David Walker..............................................Alabama 30 31 NON-VOTING MEMBERS 32 Dave Donaldson..............................................GSMFC 33 Leo Danaher..................................................USCG 34 35 STAFF 36 Steven Atran.............................Senior Fishery Biologist 37 Matt Freeman............................................Economist 38 John Froeschke.....................Fishery Biologist-Statistician 39 Douglas Gregory................................Executive Director 40 Karen Hoak...................Administrative & Financial Assistant 41 Morgan Kilgour..................................Fishery Biologist 42 Ava Lasseter.......................................Anthropologist 43 Mara Levy....................................NOAA General Counsel 44 Emily Muehlstein.......................Public Information Officer 45 Bernadine Roy......................................Office Manager 46 Camilla Shireman.........................Administrative Assistant 47 Carrie Simmons....................................Deputy Director 48 1 1 OTHER PARTICIPANTS 2 Kirk Abernathy.....................................Birmingham, AL 3 Greg Abrams.......................................Panama City, FL 4 Andreas Anastassakis.................................Bessemer, AL 5 Bill Arant.........................................Birmingham, AL 6 Darrel Arnold......................................Birmingham, AL 7 Roger Ball.........................................Birmingham, AL 8 Scott Bannon....................Alabama Marine Resources Division 9 Avery Bates..............Organized Seafood Association of Alabama 10 Dean Blanchard.....................................Grand Isle, LA 11 Randy Boggs......................................Orange Beach, AL 12 Ryan Bradley..............Mississippi Commercial Fisheries United 13 Eric Brazer.......................Reef Fish Shareholders Alliance 14 David Campbell.....................................Birmingham, AL 15 Shane Cantrell................................................CFA 16 Ted Childress......................................Birmingham, AL 17 Chris Conklin...............................................SAFMC 18 Russell Cunningham.................................Birmingham, AL 19 Scott Dagget....................................Madeira Beach, FL 20 Jason Delacruz.................................................FL 21 Tim Essington................................Lenfest, Seattle, WA 22 Price Evans...................................................... 23 Tracy Floyd......................................MDMR, Biloxi, MS 24 Susan Gerhart................................................NMFS 25 Buddy Guindon.......................................Galveston, TX 26 Ken Haddad................................................ASA, FL 27 Scott Hickman.......................................Galveston, TX 28 Tom Hilton.............................................Arcola, TX 29 Alison Johnson.............................................Oceana 30 Bill Kelly..............................................FKCFA, FL 31 Bobby Kelly......................................Orange Beach, AL 32 Randy Lauser..............................SOFA, Madeira Beach, FL 33 Richard Lewis......................................Birmingham, AL 34 Joe Nash.........................................Orange Beach, AL 35 Bart Niquet.......................................Panama City, FL 36 Chris Niquet......................................Panama City, FL 37 Bill Owens..........................................Galveston, TX 38 Wiley Parks........................................Montgomery, AL 39 Clay Porch..................................................SEFSC 40 David Rainer..............................................AL DCNR 41 Mike Rowell......................................Orange Beach, AL 42 Lee Shook..........................................Birmingham, AL 43 Jay Skinner........................................Birmingham, AL 44 Robert Spaeth.............................SOFA, Madeira Beach, FL 45 Bill Staff.......................................Orange Beach, AL 46 Mike Thierry...................................Dauphin Island, AL 47 Skipper Thierry................................Dauphin Island, AL 48 Mark Tryon........................................Gulf Breeze, FL 2 1 Russell Underwood.................................Panama City, FL 2 Thao Vu............MS Coalition for Vietnamese-American Fishermen 3 Stewart Webb.......................................Birmingham, AL 4 Bubba Wells........................................Birmingham, AL 5 Wayne Werner..........................................Alachua, FL 6 Johnny Williams.....................................Galveston, TX 7 David Williamson...................................Birmingham, AL 8 Dale Woodruff....................................Orange Beach, AL 9 10 - - - 11 3 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 3 Table of Contents................................................4 4 5 Table of Motions.................................................5 6 7 Call to Order, Announcements, and Introductions..................9 8 9 Adoption of Agenda and Approval of Minutes.......................10 10 11 Review of Exempted Fishing Permit (EFP) Applications, if any ....11 12 13 Presentations....................................................11 14 Lenfest Ecosystem Task Force................................11 15 Alabama Law Enforcement Presentation........................24 16 17 Committee Reports................................................39 18 Administrative/Budget Committee Report......................39 19 Law Enforcement Committee Report............................40 20 Sustainable Fisheries Committee Report......................42 21 22 Public Comment...................................................50 23 24 Committee Reports (continued) ...................................107 25 Shrimp Committee Report.....................................107 26 Data Collection Committee Report............................110 27 Spiny Lobster Committee Report..............................125 28 Joint Coral/Habitat Protection & Restoration Report.........126 29 Reef Fish Committee Report..................................131 30 31 Supporting Agencies Update.......................................202 32 U.S. Coast Guard............................................202 33 SAFMC.......................................................204 34 Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission.....................205 35 36 Other Business...................................................206 37 Discussion of Pending Meeting with State Officials..........206 38 Discussion of Referendum....................................207 39 Discussion of Recreational Ad Hoc AP Meeting................208 40 41 Adjournment......................................................211 42 43 - - - 44 4 1 2 TABLE OF MOTIONS 3 4 PAGE 39: Motion to accept the revised language as stated in the 5 SOPPs. 6.4 Check Signatures: All checks issued will bear two 6 authorizing signatures, these signatures being two of either: 7 the Administrative Officer, the Executive Director, or the 8 Deputy Executive Director. All checks processed through 9 accounts payable for amounts greater than $5,000 must be 10 manually signed. The motion carried on page 40. 11 12 PAGE 42: Motion to instruct staff to develop an action to 13 require either descending devices or venting tools onboard 14 vessels possessing reef fish to reduce discard mortality. The 15 motion carried on page 45. 16 17 PAGE 108: Motion that the Texas closure out to 200 miles run 18 concurrent with the date the State of Texas recommends for the 19 2017 shrimp season. The motion carried on page 108. 20 21 PAGE 108: Motion to approve Shrimp Amendment 17B and that it be 22 forwarded to the Secretary of Commerce for review and 23 implementation, and deem the codified text as necessary and 24 appropriate, giving staff editorial license to make the 25 necessary changes in the document. The Council Chair is given 26 the authority to deem any changes to the codified text as 27 necessary and appropriate. The motion carried on page 110. 28 29 PAGE 125: Motion to make Alternative 2 the preferred 30 alternative in Action 2. Alternative 2 is prohibit the use of 31 traps for recreational
Load more

Recommended publications
  • No. 40. the System of Lunar Craters, Quadrant Ii Alice P
    NO. 40. THE SYSTEM OF LUNAR CRATERS, QUADRANT II by D. W. G. ARTHUR, ALICE P. AGNIERAY, RUTH A. HORVATH ,tl l C.A. WOOD AND C. R. CHAPMAN \_9 (_ /_) March 14, 1964 ABSTRACT The designation, diameter, position, central-peak information, and state of completeness arc listed for each discernible crater in the second lunar quadrant with a diameter exceeding 3.5 km. The catalog contains more than 2,000 items and is illustrated by a map in 11 sections. his Communication is the second part of The However, since we also have suppressed many Greek System of Lunar Craters, which is a catalog in letters used by these authorities, there was need for four parts of all craters recognizable with reasonable some care in the incorporation of new letters to certainty on photographs and having diameters avoid confusion. Accordingly, the Greek letters greater than 3.5 kilometers. Thus it is a continua- added by us are always different from those that tion of Comm. LPL No. 30 of September 1963. The have been suppressed. Observers who wish may use format is the same except for some minor changes the omitted symbols of Blagg and Miiller without to improve clarity and legibility. The information in fear of ambiguity. the text of Comm. LPL No. 30 therefore applies to The photographic coverage of the second quad- this Communication also. rant is by no means uniform in quality, and certain Some of the minor changes mentioned above phases are not well represented. Thus for small cra- have been introduced because of the particular ters in certain longitudes there are no good determi- nature of the second lunar quadrant, most of which nations of the diameters, and our values are little is covered by the dark areas Mare Imbrium and better than rough estimates.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary Glossary
    Glossary Glossary Albedo A measure of an object’s reflectivity. A pure white reflecting surface has an albedo of 1.0 (100%). A pitch-black, nonreflecting surface has an albedo of 0.0. The Moon is a fairly dark object with a combined albedo of 0.07 (reflecting 7% of the sunlight that falls upon it). The albedo range of the lunar maria is between 0.05 and 0.08. The brighter highlands have an albedo range from 0.09 to 0.15. Anorthosite Rocks rich in the mineral feldspar, making up much of the Moon’s bright highland regions. Aperture The diameter of a telescope’s objective lens or primary mirror. Apogee The point in the Moon’s orbit where it is furthest from the Earth. At apogee, the Moon can reach a maximum distance of 406,700 km from the Earth. Apollo The manned lunar program of the United States. Between July 1969 and December 1972, six Apollo missions landed on the Moon, allowing a total of 12 astronauts to explore its surface. Asteroid A minor planet. A large solid body of rock in orbit around the Sun. Banded crater A crater that displays dusky linear tracts on its inner walls and/or floor. 250 Basalt A dark, fine-grained volcanic rock, low in silicon, with a low viscosity. Basaltic material fills many of the Moon’s major basins, especially on the near side. Glossary Basin A very large circular impact structure (usually comprising multiple concentric rings) that usually displays some degree of flooding with lava. The largest and most conspicuous lava- flooded basins on the Moon are found on the near side, and most are filled to their outer edges with mare basalts.
    [Show full text]
  • Planetary Surfaces
    Chapter 4 PLANETARY SURFACES 4.1 The Absence of Bedrock A striking and obvious observation is that at full Moon, the lunar surface is bright from limb to limb, with only limited darkening toward the edges. Since this effect is not consistent with the intensity of light reflected from a smooth sphere, pre-Apollo observers concluded that the upper surface was porous on a centimeter scale and had the properties of dust. The thickness of the dust layer was a critical question for landing on the surface. The general view was that a layer a few meters thick of rubble and dust from the meteorite bombardment covered the surface. Alternative views called for kilometer thicknesses of fine dust, filling the maria. The unmanned missions, notably Surveyor, resolved questions about the nature and bearing strength of the surface. However, a somewhat surprising feature of the lunar surface was the completeness of the mantle or blanket of debris. Bedrock exposures are extremely rare, the occurrence in the wall of Hadley Rille (Fig. 6.6) being the only one which was observed closely during the Apollo missions. Fragments of rock excavated during meteorite impact are, of course, common, and provided both samples and evidence of co,mpetent rock layers at shallow levels in the mare basins. Freshly exposed surface material (e.g., bright rays from craters such as Tycho) darken with time due mainly to the production of glass during micro- meteorite impacts. Since some magnetic anomalies correlate with unusually bright regions, the solar wind bombardment (which is strongly deflected by the magnetic anomalies) may also be responsible for darkening the surface [I].
    [Show full text]
  • NINETY-NINE 9\Je\Ns
    NINETY-NINE THE INTERNATIONAL WOMEN PILOT S MAGAZINE J _________ November-December,N 1993 • Crater Lake Flyers • !Ange(s — Corporate Angel Network • Becoming a “FED” Successful Board Meeting Reflects Fresh Outlook Just ask the Governors who were present; they didn’t pick up their knitting once - well, maybe once! The fall Board agenda was packed with items for discussion and action. On pages 10, 11 and 15 of this issue you’ll find detailed reports covering many of the items we evaluated, discussed, voted on, remanded for additional President’s Message information or to a committee, etc. We selected a new N e w s editor, Betty Rowley, and extended our thanks to Ann Cooper for her wonderful effort as editor. We discussed an informal proposal made by a member of the Atchison Historical Society Board that The 99s consider deeding 60 percent ownership of the Amelia Earhart Birthplace Museum to the Historical Society. In exchange, an undefined amount of funding for restoration would be made available. The Board unanimously decided they needed considerably more information Board members Alexis Koehler, Connie Woods, Joyce Wells, Gene Nora Jessen, Doris before an accurate assessment of this Abbate, Lee Orr, Carolyn Carpp, Lu Hollander and Lois Erickson pause during a full early-stage proposal could be fairly Board meeting schedule to look at one of the many early-day scrapbooks housed at 99s' International Headquarters. evaluated and acted upon. This addi­ tional information has been requested from the 99s’ Birthplace Museum Board, and will be available for further consideration prior to the spring Board meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • National Blue Ribbon Schools Recognized 1982-2015
    NATIONAL BLUE RIBBON SCHOOLS PROGRAM Schools Recognized 1982 Through 2015 School Name City Year ALABAMA Academy for Academics and Arts Huntsville 87-88 Anna F. Booth Elementary School Irvington 2010 Auburn Early Education Center Auburn 98-99 Barkley Bridge Elementary School Hartselle 2011 Bear Exploration Center for Mathematics, Science Montgomery 2015 and Technology School Beverlye Magnet School Dothan 2014 Bob Jones High School Madison 92-93 Brewbaker Technology Magnet High School Montgomery 2009 Brookwood Forest Elementary School Birmingham 98-99 Buckhorn High School New Market 01-02 Bush Middle School Birmingham 83-84 C.F. Vigor High School Prichard 83-84 Cahaba Heights Community School Birmingham 85-86 Calcedeaver Elementary School Mount Vernon 2006 Cherokee Bend Elementary School Mountain Brook 2009 Clark-Shaw Magnet School Mobile 2015 Corpus Christi School Mobile 89-90 Crestline Elementary School Mountain Brook 01-02, 2015 Daphne High School Daphne 2012 Demopolis High School Demopolis 2008 East Highland Middle School Sylacauga 84-85 Edgewood Elementary School Homewood 91-92 Elvin Hill Elementary School Columbiana 87-88 Enterprise High School Enterprise 83-84 EPIC Elementary School Birmingham 93-94 Eura Brown Elementary School Gadsden 91-92 Forest Avenue Academic Magnet Elementary School Montgomery 2007 Forest Hills School Florence 2012 Fruithurst Elementary School Fruithurst 2010 George Hall Elementary School Mobile 96-97 George Hall Elementary School Mobile 2008 1 of 216 School Name City Year Grantswood Community School Irondale 91-92 Guntersville Elementary School Guntersville 98-99 Heard Magnet School Dothan 2014 Hewitt-Trussville High School Trussville 92-93 Holtville High School Deatsville 2013 Holy Spirit Regional Catholic School Huntsville 2013 Homewood High School Homewood 83-84 Homewood Middle School Homewood 83-84, 96-97 Indian Valley Elementary School Sylacauga 89-90 Inverness Elementary School Birmingham 96-97 Ira F.
    [Show full text]
  • Slope - Geologic Age Relationships in Complex Lunar Craters C
    49th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference 2018 (LPI Contrib. No. 2083) 2399.pdf SLOPE - GEOLOGIC AGE RELATIONSHIPS IN COMPLEX LUNAR CRATERS C. Rojas1, P. Mahanti1, M. S. Robinson1, LROC Team1, 1LROC Science Operation Center, School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona ([email protected]) Table 1: List of complex craters. *Copernican craters Introduction: Impact events leading to formation Crater D (km) Model Age (Ga) Lon Lat of basins and large craters dominate the early history Moore F* 24 0.041∓0.012 [8] 37.30 185.0 of the Moon [1] leading to kilometer scale topographic Wiener F* 30 0.017∓0.002 149.9740.90 variations on the lunar surface, with smaller crater [2], Klute W* 31 0.090∓0.007 216.7037.98 progressively introducing higher frequency topography. Necho* 37 0.080∓0.024 [8] 123.3 –5.3 Crater wall slopes represent most of the overall topo- Aristarchus* 40 0.175∓0.0095 312.5 23.7 graphic variation since many locations on the Moon are Jackson* 71 0.147∓0.038 [9] 196.7 22.1 craters. While impact events lead to the formation of McLaughlin 75 3.7∓0.1 [10] 267.1747.01 steep slopes [3], they are also primarily responsible for Pitiscus 80 3.8∓0.1 [10] 30.57 -50.61 landform degradation [4]. During crater formation, tar- Al-Biruni 80 3.8∓0.1 [10] 92.62 18.09 get properties and processes controlling structural sta- La Pérouse 80 3.6∓0.1 [10] -10.66 76.18 bility limit maximum slopes [4].
    [Show full text]
  • 1876-09-09.Pdf
    KVOL. VI. DOVER, MORRIS COUNTY, NEW JERSJEY, SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER U, 1870. NO. 39 Curds. POKTIC. 1 E'IVIK'II l»:n I. i THE IRON ERA A few mouths ago two gen'lcmen wenl A family on Pine strciit oo a jiup o Perhaps the uwat ftimilinr of inybtori- IS VAIX. xcerr THAT ^OUE WORE IIUDI; OIIS'A A fumily named Smith ban recently (niflHfuirids nro tlirm protlnciul liv Uiu fCDUauiffi Busy SATCIDAT I t K. A. BENNETT, Af. D , .HIVIJI] toOenminlowiJ, uml Mr, Brown s"[iut to fiKbt a duel upropus of an nclrcss, the KcnTouQdliitid brand—ono of U.HSI Ah, paldoti nith tliu Iruntlng njljn, AND OT1IEI13 WEIIB TATTOOI'D. add 11)13 ia Iiotr inntturs p:mai!tl: 51.libyful creatures with misehkvaitH even, Yi'Dtrifaqniat; fitniiliar, 1JUC.IIIHB ulfiioat .J.V, <m Saturday, leaned ovor tbo fence every country fair ia vitritcid liy one ur BENJ.II.VOGT. HOMCEOPATHIC Tlii.ii; ii. M luiili:Lire sivain! nmt Riive to our rejinricir nia im|»reHsiooH Fcuillit-rndo and OHiviur, tbe flnt "*w- Vhv. family are very niucj ultachuil to it. Yon may wait till the cnm',03 Hrlligbl diou, y nn tb b tinted" by MM. Peilcller and Gitillurd. Iu tbetio hard tiuiiu tu become uttncli n dUit'r of tha-e exbibitorii, niyhterifius, EDITOR i«o pr.oniF.Tor,. nf Mr. Hinitb'abuy, a li'd ubuutfmirtocu bcL-aiiMo tlio r«nl Knurco of suUnd d<ip« PHYSICIAN & SUKGKOX, Till Ilia fliry stjin tlnHli nut hi tbo ekk-a, 187C, iirnviuE ul H*tug KOUK yeiii-H old: tbcRPCond by MM.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tennessee Meteorite Impact Sites and Changing Perspectives on Impact Cratering
    UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN QUEENSLAND THE TENNESSEE METEORITE IMPACT SITES AND CHANGING PERSPECTIVES ON IMPACT CRATERING A dissertation submitted by Janaruth Harling Ford B.A. Cum Laude (Vanderbilt University), M. Astron. (University of Western Sydney) For the award of Doctor of Philosophy 2015 ABSTRACT Terrestrial impact structures offer astronomers and geologists opportunities to study the impact cratering process. Tennessee has four structures of interest. Information gained over the last century and a half concerning these sites is scattered throughout astronomical, geological and other specialized scientific journals, books, and literature, some of which are elusive. Gathering and compiling this widely- spread information into one historical document benefits the scientific community in general. The Wells Creek Structure is a proven impact site, and has been referred to as the ‘syntype’ cryptoexplosion structure for the United State. It was the first impact structure in the United States in which shatter cones were identified and was probably the subject of the first detailed geological report on a cryptoexplosive structure in the United States. The Wells Creek Structure displays bilateral symmetry, and three smaller ‘craters’ lie to the north of the main Wells Creek structure along its axis of symmetry. The question remains as to whether or not these structures have a common origin with the Wells Creek structure. The Flynn Creek Structure, another proven impact site, was first mentioned as a site of disturbance in Safford’s 1869 report on the geology of Tennessee. It has been noted as the terrestrial feature that bears the closest resemblance to a typical lunar crater, even though it is the probable result of a shallow marine impact.
    [Show full text]
  • All Roads in County (Updated January 2020)
    All Roads Inside Deschutes County ROAD #: 07996 SEGMENT FROM TO TRS OWNER CLASS SURFACE LENGTH (mi) <null> <null> 211009 Other Rural Local Dirt-Graded <null> County Road Length: 0 101ST LN ROAD #: 02265 SEGMENT FROM TO TRS OWNER CLASS SURFACE LENGTH (mi) 10 0 101ST ST 0.262 END BULB 151204 Deschutes County Rural Local Macadam, Oil 0.262 Mat County Road Length: 0.262 101ST ST ROAD #: 02270 SEGMENT FROM TO TRS OWNER CLASS SURFACE LENGTH (mi) 10 0 HWY 126 0.357 MAPLE LN, NW 151204 Deschutes County Rural Local Macadam, Oil 0.357 Mat 20 0.357 MAPLE LN, NW 1.205 95TH ST 151203 Deschutes County Rural Local Macadam, Oil 0.848 Mat County Road Length: 1.205 103RD ST ROAD #: 02259 SEGMENT FROM TO TRS OWNER CLASS SURFACE LENGTH (mi) <null> <null> 151209 Local Access Road Rural Local AC <null> <null> <null> 151209 Unknown Rural Local AC <null> 40 2.75 BEGIN 3.004 COYNER AVE, 141228 Deschutes County Rural Local Macadam, Oil 0.254 NW Mat County Road Length: 0.254 105TH CT Page 1 of 975 \\Road\GIS_Proj\ArcGIS_Products\Road Lists\Full List 2020 DCRD Report 1/02/2020 ROAD #: 02261 SEGMENT FROM TO TRS OWNER CLASS SURFACE LENGTH (mi) 10 0 QUINCE AVE, NW 0.11 END BUBBLE 151204 Deschutes County Rural Local Macadam, Oil 0.11 Mat County Road Length: 0.11 10TH ST ROAD #: 02188 SEGMENT FROM TO TRS OWNER CLASS SURFACE LENGTH (mi) <null> <null> 151304 City of Redmond City Collector AC <null> <null> <null> 151309 City of Redmond City Local AC <null> <null> <null> 151304 City of Redmond City Collector Macadam, Oil <null> Mat <null> <null> 141333 City of Redmond Rural
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Workshop on New Technologies for Lunar Resource Assessment
    JOINT WORKSHOP ON NEW TECHNOLOGIES FOR LUNAR RESOURCE ASSESSMENT t)--- LPI Technical Report Number 92,06 _ LUNAR AND PLANETARY INSTITUTE 3600 BAY AREA BOULEVARD HOUSTON TX 77058-1113 LPIITR--92-06 Cover: Artist's concept of an oxygen production module at a lunar base. Oxygen is extracted from lunar soil, liquified, and put into the spherical tanks. Solid byproducts and slag are removed from the sides of the module for disposal or use elsewhere as radiation shielding. A mining module is shown in the background. NASA photo S90·46025. JOINT WORKSHOP ON NEW TECHNOLOGIES FOR LUNAR RESOURCE ASSESSMENT Edited by R. C. Elphic and D. S. McKay Held at Santa Fe, New Mexico April 6- 7, 1992 Sponsored by DOE/Los Alamos National Laboratory NASA Johnson Space Center Lunar and Planetary Institute Lunar and Planetary Institute 3600 Bay Area Boulevard Houston TX 77058-1113 LPI Technical Report Number 92-06 LPIITR,,92,06 Compiled in 1992 by LUNAR AND PLANETARY INSTITUTE The Insrirure is operared by Universiries Space Research Associarion under Con­ rract NASW-4574 wirh rhe Narional Aeronaurics and Space Adminisrrarion. Material in rhis documenr may be copied wirhout restrainr for library, absrracr service, educarional, or personal research purposes; however, republicarion of any porrion requires rhe wrirren permissiol'l of the aurhors as well as appropriare acknowledgmenr of this publicarion. This reporr may be cired as Elphic R. C. and McKay D. S., eds. (1992) Join! Workshop on New Technologies for Lunar Resource Assessment. LPI Tech. Rpr. 92-06, Lunar and Planetary Instirure, Houston. 56 pp. Papers in this repon may be cired as Aurhor A.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Sexual Abuse Claims in Chapter 11 Cases of Boy Scouts of America
    Summary of Sexual Abuse Claims in Chapter 11 Cases of Boy Scouts of America There are approximately 101,135sexual abuse claims filed. Of those claims, the Tort Claimants’ Committee estimates that there are approximately 83,807 unique claims if the amended and superseded and multiple claims filed on account of the same survivor are removed. The summary of sexual abuse claims below uses the set of 83,807 of claim for purposes of claims summary below.1 The Tort Claimants’ Committee has broken down the sexual abuse claims in various categories for the purpose of disclosing where and when the sexual abuse claims arose and the identity of certain of the parties that are implicated in the alleged sexual abuse. Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is a chart that shows the sexual abuse claims broken down by the year in which they first arose. Please note that there approximately 10,500 claims did not provide a date for when the sexual abuse occurred. As a result, those claims have not been assigned a year in which the abuse first arose. Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is a chart that shows the claims broken down by the state or jurisdiction in which they arose. Please note there are approximately 7,186 claims that did not provide a location of abuse. Those claims are reflected by YY or ZZ in the codes used to identify the applicable state or jurisdiction. Those claims have not been assigned a state or other jurisdiction. Attached hereto as Exhibit 3 is a chart that shows the claims broken down by the Local Council implicated in the sexual abuse.
    [Show full text]
  • Workshop on Lunar Crater Observing and Sensing Satellite (LCROSS) Site Selection, P
    WORKSHOP PROGRAM AND ABSTRACTS LPI Contribution No. 1327 WWWOOORRRKKKSSSHHHOOOPPP OOONNN LLLUUUNNNAAARRR CCCRRRAAATTTEEERRR OOOBBBSSSEEERRRVVVIIINNNGGG AAANNNDDD SSSEEENNNSSSIIINNNGGG SSSAAATTTEEELLLLLLIIITTTEEE (((LLLCCCRRROOOSSSSSS))) SSSIIITTTEEE SSSEEELLLEEECCCTTTIIIOOONNN OOOCCCTTTOOOBBBEEERRR 111666,,, 222000000666 NNNAAASSSAAA AAAMMMEEESSS RRREEESSSEEEAAARRRCCCHHH CCCEEENNNTTTEEERRR MMMOOOFFFFFFEEETTTTTT FFFIIIEEELLLDDD,,, CCCAAALLLIIIFFFOOORRRNNNIIIAAA SSSPPPOOONNNSSSOOORRRSSS LCROSS Mission Project NASA Ames Research Center Lunar and Planetary Institute National Aeronautics and Space Administration SSSCCCIIIEEENNNTTTIIIFFFIIICCC OOORRRGGGAAANNNIIIZZZIIINNNGGG CCCOOOMMMMMMIIITTTTTTEEEEEE Jennifer Heldmann (chair) NASA Ames Research Center/SETI Institute Geoff Briggs NASA Ames Research Center Tony Colaprete NASA Ames Research Center Don Korycansky University of California, Santa Cruz Pete Schultz Brown University Lunar and Planetary Institute 3600 Bay Area Boulevard Houston TX 77058-1113 LPI Contribution No. 1327 Compiled in 2006 by LUNAR AND PLANETARY INSTITUTE The Institute is operated by the Universities Space Research Association under Agreement No. NCC5-679 issued through the Solar System Exploration Division of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this volume are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Material in this volume may be copied without restraint for
    [Show full text]