The Guerrilla Resistance Against the Japanese in the Philippines During World War II

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Guerrilla Resistance Against the Japanese in the Philippines During World War II Awaiting the Allies’ Return: The Guerrilla Resistance Against the Japanese in the Philippines during World War II Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University James A. Villanueva Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2019 Dissertation Committee Dr. Peter R. Mansoor, Advisor Dr. Mark Grimsley Dr. Bruno Cabanes Copyright by James Alexander Villanueva 2019 Abstract During World War II, guerrillas from across the Philippines opposed Imperial Japan’s occupation of the archipelago. While the guerrillas often fought each other and were never strong enough to overcome the Japanese occupation on their own, they disrupted Japanese operations, kept the spirit of resistance to Japanese occupation alive, provided useful intelligence to the Allies, and assumed frontline duties fighting the Japanese following the Allies’ landing in 1944. By examining the organization, motivations, capabilities, and operations of the guerrillas, this dissertation argues that the guerrillas were effective because Japanese punitive measures pushed the majority of the population to support them, as did a strong sense of obligation and loyalty to the United States. The guerrillas benefitted from the fact that many islands in the Philippines had weak Japanese garrisons, enabling those resisting the Japanese to build safe bases and gain and train recruits. Unlike their counterparts opposing the Americans in 1899, the guerrillas during World War II benefitted from the leadership of American and Filipino military personnel, and also received significant aid and direction from General Douglas MacArthur’s Southwest Pacific Area Headquarters. The guerrillas in the Philippines stand as one of the most effective and sophisticated resistance movements in World War II, comparing favorably to Yugoslavian and Russian partisans in Europe. ii Acknowledgments This project would not have been possible without the guidance, mentorship, and feedback from my dissertation advisor, Prof. Peter Mansoor. His expertise was indispensable as I conducted research and worked on each chapter. My other committee members, Profs. Mark Grimsley and Bruno Cabanes also assisted greatly, and the concepts I learned in their classes have been incredibly helpful as I crafted my arguments. I am also grateful for the assistance offered by the staffs at the National Archives (NARA II) in College Park, MD, the U.S. Army Heritage and Education Center at Carlisle, PA, and Jim Zobel at MacArthur Memorial Library and Archives in Norfolk, VA. Additionally, I am appreciative of the feedback from my colleagues in the Department of History at the United States Military Academy, including Professors Clifford Rogers, Sam Watson, Jenny Kiesling, John Stapleton, and Steve Waddell, as well as Colonels Ty Seidule and Bryan Gibby, who allowed time for me to work on my dissertation. The support of my parents, who have always pushed me to work hard, has always been inspiring. Last but not certainly not least, I am greatly indebted to my wife Taryn for her continued support as I worked through this project- I could not have done it without her. Any errors or mistakes in this work are mine alone. iii Vita CPT(P) James A. Villanueva was born in Belleville, NJ and graduated from the United States Military Academy in 2008 as an infantry officer with a BS in History. He has served in infantry units at Schofield Barracks, Hawaii and Fort Polk, Louisiana, and completed a combat deployment to Iraq from 2010-2011. Following command of an airborne infantry company at Fort Polk, he earned an MA in Military History from The Ohio State University in 2016 and has returned to West Point to teach in the Department of History as an Instructor and Assistant Professor. Publications “Field Artillery and Flying Columns: Combined Arms Maneuver in the Advance on and Seizure of Manila, 1945.” In Peter Schifferle, ed. Bringing Order to Chaos: Combined Arms Maneuver in Large-Scale Combat Operations. Ft. Leavenworth, KS: Army University Press, 2018. “‘The Most Outstanding Encounter’: Platoon Ambush at Macalibre Bridge, Mindanao, Philippines, 1943.” The West Point Guide to Platoon Operations. New York: Rowan Technologies, 2017. “The Destruction of the ‘Korea’ Battalion: Viet Minh Use of a Special Purpose Attack.” The West Point Guide to Small Unit Operations. New York: Rowan Technologies, 2016. Fields of Study Major Field: History iv Table of Contents Abstract……………………………………………………………………………………ii Acknowledgments………………………………………………………………………..iii Vita………………………………………………………………………………………..iv List of Tables……………………………………………………………………………..vi List of Figures……………………………………………………………………………vii Introduction………………………………………………………………………………..1 Chapter 1- The Beginnings of Resistance: Blackout and Establishment of Guerrilla Groups in the Philippines………………………………………………………………...19 Chapter 2- The Allied Intelligence Bureau and the Philippine Regional Section……….56 Chapter 3- “Quarreling Among Themselves”: SWPA and Guerrilla Conflicts…………92 Chapter 4- Setbacks and Successes: The Guerrillas from 1943-1944…………………127 Chapter 5- Guerrilla Logistics and Administration…………………………………….163 Chapter 6- Guerrillas Rising: The Guerrillas During the Liberation of the Philippines..207 Conclusion and Epilogue……………………………………………………………….243 Bibliography……………………………………………………………………………258 v List of Tables Table 1: Leyte Guerrilla Groups and Leaders ...........……………………………………52 Table 2: Samar Guerrilla Groups and Leaders ….………………………………………54 vi List of Figures Figure 1: The Japanese Invasion of the Philippines and the Forces Employed…………26 Figure 2: Gen. MacArthur Awards Jesus Villamor the Distinguished Service Cross...…59 Figure 3: Lt. Cdr. Charles Parsons, Gen. MacArthur, and Cpt. Charles M. Smith…...…72 Figure 4: Philippine Islands Communications, 15 December 1943……………………..76 Figure 5: Sketch for Attack Against Sibaloa…………………………………………...147 Figure 6: Panay Courier Network………………………………………………………149 Figure 7: Major Guerrilla Forces in the Philippines……………………………………211 Figure 8: Guerrilla Forces on Luzon, October-November 1944………………………..218 Figure 9: Central Philippines Guerrilla Organization, October-November 1944………231 Figure 10: Mindanao Guerrilla Organization, 31 January 1945………………………..238 Figure 11: Portrait of President Ramon Magsaysay…………………………………....250 vii Introduction On the morning of February 3, 1945, paratroopers of the U.S. Army’s 511th Parachute Infantry Regiment (PIR) staged a daring daylight parachute assault along Tagaytay Ridge on the island of Luzon in the Philippines, part of operations to liberate the island from Japanese occupation. The first 345 paratroopers in the eighteen lead transport planes landed near their assigned drop zone, previously scouted and marked the night before by elements of the 511th’s Demolition Platoon assisted by local Filipino guerrillas.1 However, the succeeding thirty aircraft, inexplicably trailing six miles behind this initial element, were confused when leading aircraft dropped two supply bundles prematurely. Seeing these two bundles ejected, paratroopers began exiting their C-47 transports. Despite pleas by the pilots to cease the drop because they were not yet over the correct drop zone, the jumpmasters of the 511th PIR continued to send paratroopers out of their planes. After all of the parachute drops were complete, the men of the 511th found themselves scattered over an area of six miles, with barely a third landing in the 1 Robert Ross Smith, The U.S. Army in World War II: Triumph in the Philippines, The War in the Pacific (1963; repr., Honolulu, HI: University Press of the Pacific, 2005), 227-228; E.M. Flanagan, Jr., The Angels: A History of the 11th Airborne Division (Novato, CA: Presidio Press, 1989), 239. 1 planned drop zone.2 To add to the confusion, the transport planes had not properly slowed before disgorging their paratroopers, causing many jumpers to experience an especially hard shock when their parachutes opened and resulting in the loss of helmets and other equipment.3 On top of it all, twenty- to thirty-mile-per-hour winds caused many paratroopers to experience hard landings. Fortunately for the airborne troopers, the Japanese did not oppose their parachute assault, as there were no defending troops on Tagaytay Ridge. As a later letter to the local guerrilla commander acknowledged, the Fil-American Cavite Guerrilla Forces (FACGF), one of many groups operating on Luzon prior to the Allied invasion, had already largely cleared the area of Japanese forces.4 This was one of countless actions where the overt and covert actions of Filipinos, and American servicemen and women left behind in the Philippines after the fall of Bataan and Corregidor in 1942, contributed to the Allied war effort and the liberation of the islands in 1944 and 1945. Three years earlier, on May 8, 1942, General Jonathan Wainwright, commander of American and Filipino forces in the Philippines, surrendered his battered and starving soldiers to units of the Imperial Japanese Army. Resistance to the Japanese did not cease with Wainwright’s surrender, however. Filipino guerrilla forces, often led by Filipino or 2 Of the men in the second lift of transport aircraft, 425 landed on the proper drop zone, with the other 1,345 landing between four and six miles east-northeast of the drop zone. Flanagan, The Angels, 247. 3 Ibid. 4 Headquarters, Military Police Command U.S. Army Forces Far East, “Letter to Col. Mariano M. Castaneda, Philippine Army,”
Recommended publications
  • THE PHILIPPINES, 1942-1944 James Kelly Morningstar, Doctor of History
    ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: WAR AND RESISTANCE: THE PHILIPPINES, 1942-1944 James Kelly Morningstar, Doctor of History, 2018 Dissertation directed by: Professor Jon T. Sumida, History Department What happened in the Philippine Islands between the surrender of Allied forces in May 1942 and MacArthur’s return in October 1944? Existing historiography is fragmentary and incomplete. Memoirs suffer from limited points of view and personal biases. No academic study has examined the Filipino resistance with a critical and interdisciplinary approach. No comprehensive narrative has yet captured the fighting by 260,000 guerrillas in 277 units across the archipelago. This dissertation begins with the political, economic, social and cultural history of Philippine guerrilla warfare. The diverse Islands connected only through kinship networks. The Americans reluctantly held the Islands against rising Japanese imperial interests and Filipino desires for independence and social justice. World War II revealed the inadequacy of MacArthur’s plans to defend the Islands. The General tepidly prepared for guerrilla operations while Filipinos spontaneously rose in armed resistance. After his departure, the chaotic mix of guerrilla groups were left on their own to battle the Japanese and each other. While guerrilla leaders vied for local power, several obtained radios to contact MacArthur and his headquarters sent submarine-delivered agents with supplies and radios that tie these groups into a united framework. MacArthur’s promise to return kept the resistance alive and dependent on the United States. The repercussions for social revolution would be fatal but the Filipinos’ shared sacrifice revitalized national consciousness and created a sense of deserved nationhood. The guerrillas played a key role in enabling MacArthur’s return.
    [Show full text]
  • On Celestial Wings / Edgar D
    Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Whitcomb. Edgar D. On Celestial Wings / Edgar D. Whitcomb. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. 1. United States. Army Air Forces-History-World War, 1939-1945. 2. Flight navigators- United States-Biography. 3. World War, 1939-1945-Campaigns-Pacific Area. 4. World War, 1939-1945-Personal narratives, American. I. Title. D790.W415 1996 940.54’4973-dc20 95-43048 CIP ISBN 1-58566-003-5 First Printing November 1995 Second Printing June 1998 Third Printing December 1999 Fourth Printing May 2000 Fifth Printing August 2001 Disclaimer This publication was produced in the Department of Defense school environment in the interest of academic freedom and the advancement of national defense-related concepts. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the United States government. This publication has been reviewed by security and policy review authorities and is cleared for public release. Digitize February 2003 from August 2001 Fifth Printing NOTE: Pagination changed. ii This book is dedicated to Charlie Contents Page Disclaimer........................................................................................................................... ii Foreword............................................................................................................................ vi About the author ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • America's Rangers
    America’s Rangers: The Story of America’s First Warriors and their Journey from Tradition to Institution by James Sandy, B.A. A Thesis In HISTORY Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Texas Tech University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS Approved Dr. John R. Milam Chair of Committee Dr. Laura Calkins Dr. Barton Myers Peggy Gordon Miller Dean of the Graduate School August, 2011 Copyright 2011, James Sandy Texas Tech University, James Sandy, Summer 2011 Acknowledgments This work would not have been possible without the constant encouragement and tutelage of my committee. They provided the inspiration for me to start this project, and guided me along the way as I slowly molded a very raw idea into the finished product here. Dr. Laura Calkins witnessed the birth of this project in my very first graduate class and has assisted me along every step of the way as a fantastic proofreader and a wonderful sounding board where many an idea was first verbalized. Dr. Calkins has been and will continue to be invaluable mentor and friend throughout my graduate education. Dr. Barton Myers was the latest addition to my committee, but he pushed me to expand my project further back into American History. The vast scope that this work encompasses proved to be my biggest challenge, but has come out as this works’ greatest strength. I cannot thank Dr. Myers enough for pushing me out of my comfort zone. Dr. Ron Milam has been a part of my academic career from the beginning and has long served as my inspiration in pursuing a life in academia.
    [Show full text]
  • New Jersey in Focus: the World War I Era 1910-1920
    New Jersey in Focus: The World War I Era 1910-1920 Exhibit at the Monmouth County Library Headquarters 125 Symmes Drive Manalapan, New Jersey October 2015 Organized by The Monmouth County Archives Division of the Monmouth County Clerk Christine Giordano Hanlon Gary D. Saretzky, Curator Eugene Osovitz, Preparer Produced by the Monmouth County Archives 125 Symmes Drive Manalapan, NJ 07726 New Jersey in Focus: The World War I Era, 1910-1920 About one hundred years ago, during the 1910-1920 decade in America, the economy boomed and the Gross National Product more than doubled. Ten million Americans bought automobiles, most for the first time. Ford’s Model T, produced with then revolutionary assembly line methods, transformed family life for owners. Such personal “machines” led to paved roads and the first traffic light, reduced the need for blacksmiths and horses, increased the demand for auto mechanics and gas stations, and, when not caught up in traffic jams, sped up daily life. Some owners braved dirt roads to drive to the Jersey Shore, where thousands thronged to see the annual Baby Parade in Asbury Park. While roads at the start of the decade were barely adequate for travel in the emerging auto boom, New Jersey became a leader in the advocacy and construction of improved thoroughfares. Better road and rail transportation facilitated both industrial and agricultural production, bringing such new products as commercially grown blueberries from Whitesbog, New Jersey, to urban dwellers. In the air, history was made in 1912, when the first flight to deliver mail between two government post offices landed in South Amboy.
    [Show full text]
  • Philippine Airlines' Laboratory and Testing Partners for Philippine Domestic Travel
    Philippine Airlines’ Laboratory and Testing Partners for Philippine Domestic Travel RAPID TEST AND RT-PCR TEST PARTNER One Health Medical Services, Inc. ADDRESS: OHM Building, Andrews Avenue (beside PAL Gate 1A), MIAA Zone, Pasay City 1300 LANDLINE: (+632) 8938-6680 to 81 MOBILE: (+639) 66-561-7639 E-MAIL: [email protected] RELEASE OF TEST RESULTS: 20 min for Rapid Tests, 24-48 hrs for RT-PCR Tests RT-PCR TEST PARTNERS Cardinal Santos Medical Center Fe Del Mundo Medical Center ADDRESS: 10 Wilson, Greenhills West, San Juan 1502 ADDRESS: 11 Banawe st. Brgy Dona Josefa, Quezon City LANDLINE: (+632) 8724-3997 LANDLINE: (+632) 8712-0845 loc 1903 and 1601 MOBILE: (+639) 49-333-5489 MOBILE: (+639) 17-5583-726 E-MAIL: [email protected] E-MAIL: [email protected] WEBSITE: www.csmceconsult.com WEBSITE: www.fedelmundo.com.ph RELEASE OF TEST RESULTS: 72-120 hrs RELEASE OF TEST RESULTS: 48-72 hrs Kaiser Medical Center New World Diagnostics WEBSITE: https://appointments.kaisermedcenter.com/pal WEBSITE: https://www.nwdi.com.ph/ RELEASE OF TEST RESULTS: 24 hrs RELEASE OF TEST RESULTS: 48-72 hrs (excl. Sun) MAKATI CITY QUEZON CITY ADDRESS: G/F King's Court Building 1, 2129 Don Chino ADDRESS: 205 D. Tuazon Street, Brgy. Maharlika, Roces Avenue, Makati City Quezon City, Philippines LANDLINE: (+632) 8804-9988 LANDLINE: (+632) 8790-8888, local 218 or 225 MOBILE: (+639) 17-577-3886 MOBILE: OIC – Laboratory Manager Gretchen Catli: E-MAIL: [email protected] (+639) 17-530-1143, Sales & Marketing Manager Rio E. Barrozo: (+639) 16-453-5662 MANILA CITY E-MAIL: [email protected], ADDRESS: G/F Robinsons Place Ermita, Manila [email protected] LANDLINE: (+632) 8353-0495 MOBILE: (+639) 17-183-5488 QUEZON CITY E-MAIL: [email protected] ADDRESS: G/F Hipolito Bldg.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Tom Shell Gwen Wright
    Season 6, Episode 7: Black Tom Shell Gwen Wright: Our first story probes a devastating act of foreign sabotage on American soil. World War One. America is determined to remain neutral. Then, an earth-shaking explosion rocks New Jersey and Manhattan. Headlines attribute the devastation and carnage to an industrial accident on nearby Black Tom Island. But Black Tom was being used to store ammunition bound for British guns…and the blast was no accident. Unlike other terrifying peacetime attacks, however -- Pearl Harbor or 9/11 -- Black Tom is little known, and strangely faded from history. Almost a century later, Elaine Harvan Barbini from White House Station, New Jersey, believes she has an artillery shell that survived that fateful attack. Elaine: My mother always used it at home as a doorstop and I thought wouldn’t be great to find out more history about it and see if you could trace it back and actually find out how it got into the family. Gwen: I’m Gwendolyn Wright, and I’m here to take a careful look at Elaine’s shell. Hi you’re Elaine? Elaine: Nice to meet you. Please come in. Gwen: So this is what you wanted to show me? Elaine: Yes it is. Gwen: Wow. This does look like an artillery shell, what do you know about it? Elaine: Very little. My mom had put this piece of paper in it. It says “Bomb, Black Tom explosion” and she wasn’t sure the year she put 1914 and World War I. Gwen: Aren’t you a little nervous about having what might still be live ammunition in your house? Elaine: I know my mom did have this checked out so it is safe.
    [Show full text]
  • Province, City, Municipality Total and Barangay Population AURORA
    2010 Census of Population and Housing Aurora Total Population by Province, City, Municipality and Barangay: as of May 1, 2010 Province, City, Municipality Total and Barangay Population AURORA 201,233 BALER (Capital) 36,010 Barangay I (Pob.) 717 Barangay II (Pob.) 374 Barangay III (Pob.) 434 Barangay IV (Pob.) 389 Barangay V (Pob.) 1,662 Buhangin 5,057 Calabuanan 3,221 Obligacion 1,135 Pingit 4,989 Reserva 4,064 Sabang 4,829 Suclayin 5,923 Zabali 3,216 CASIGURAN 23,865 Barangay 1 (Pob.) 799 Barangay 2 (Pob.) 665 Barangay 3 (Pob.) 257 Barangay 4 (Pob.) 302 Barangay 5 (Pob.) 432 Barangay 6 (Pob.) 310 Barangay 7 (Pob.) 278 Barangay 8 (Pob.) 601 Calabgan 496 Calangcuasan 1,099 Calantas 1,799 Culat 630 Dibet 971 Esperanza 458 Lual 1,482 Marikit 609 Tabas 1,007 Tinib 765 National Statistics Office 1 2010 Census of Population and Housing Aurora Total Population by Province, City, Municipality and Barangay: as of May 1, 2010 Province, City, Municipality Total and Barangay Population Bianuan 3,440 Cozo 1,618 Dibacong 2,374 Ditinagyan 587 Esteves 1,786 San Ildefonso 1,100 DILASAG 15,683 Diagyan 2,537 Dicabasan 677 Dilaguidi 1,015 Dimaseset 1,408 Diniog 2,331 Lawang 379 Maligaya (Pob.) 1,801 Manggitahan 1,760 Masagana (Pob.) 1,822 Ura 712 Esperanza 1,241 DINALUNGAN 10,988 Abuleg 1,190 Zone I (Pob.) 1,866 Zone II (Pob.) 1,653 Nipoo (Bulo) 896 Dibaraybay 1,283 Ditawini 686 Mapalad 812 Paleg 971 Simbahan 1,631 DINGALAN 23,554 Aplaya 1,619 Butas Na Bato 813 Cabog (Matawe) 3,090 Caragsacan 2,729 National Statistics Office 2 2010 Census of Population and
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Karapatan Yearend Report (WEB).Pdf
    2017 KARAPATAN YEAR-END REPORT ON THE HUMAN RIGHTS SITUATION IN THE PHILIPPINES Duterte’s Choice: The Tyrant Emerged 2017 Karapatan Year-End Report on the Human Rights Situation in the Philippines Duterte’s Choice: The Tyrant Emerged Published in the Philippines in 2018 by KARAPATAN 2/F Erythrina Bldg., 1 Maaralin St., Central District, Diliman Quezon City 1100 Philippines Telefax: (+63 2) 435 41 46 [email protected] www.karapatan.org KARAPATAN is an alliance of human rights organizations and programmes, human rights desks and committees of people’s organisations, and individual advocates committed to the defense and promotion of people’s rights and civil liberties. It monitors and documents cases of human rights violations, assists and defends victims, and conducts education, training and campaigns. Cover art by Archie Oclos “Mahal Ko Ang Pilipinas,” 4 ft x 8 ft mural, latex on plywood, 2017 Lay-out by Ron Villegas Photos/Images: Manila Bulletin, ABS-CBN, Altermidya, Kadamay, Karapatan Southern Mindanao, Karapatan Cagayan Valley, Bulatlat, Kilab Multimedia, IFI, Katungod Sinirangang Bisayas, Leonilo Doloricon, Renan Ortiz, Dee Ayroso, AFP-Getty Images, Bicol Today, Ilocos Human Rights Alliance, Interaksyon, RMP-NMR, Daily Mail UK, Alcadev, Obet de Castro, Cordillera Human Rights Alliance, Fox News, Rappler, Karapatan Western Mindanao, Humabol Bohol, Brigada News Davao, IBON, Crispin B. Beltran Resource Center, Tindeg Ranao, Carl Anthony Olalo, Luigi Almuena The reproduction and distribution of information contained in this publication are allowed as long as the sources are cited, and KARAPATAN is acknowledged as the source. Please furnish Karapatan copies of the final work where the quotation or citation appears.
    [Show full text]
  • World War Ii in the Philippines
    WORLD WAR II IN THE PHILIPPINES The Legacy of Two Nations©2016 Copyright 2016 by C. Gaerlan, Bataan Legacy Historical Society. All Rights Reserved. World War II in the Philippines The Legacy of Two Nations©2016 By Bataan Legacy Historical Society Several hours after the bombing of Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, the Philippines, a colony of the United States from 1898 to 1946, was attacked by the Empire of Japan. During the next four years, thou- sands of Filipino and American soldiers died. The entire Philippine nation was ravaged and its capital Ma- nila, once called the Pearl of the Orient, became the second most devastated city during World War II after Warsaw, Poland. Approximately one million civilians perished. Despite so much sacrifice and devastation, on February 20, 1946, just five months after the war ended, the First Supplemental Surplus Appropriation Rescission Act was passed by U.S. Congress which deemed the service of the Filipino soldiers as inactive, making them ineligible for benefits under the G.I. Bill of Rights. To this day, these rights have not been fully -restored and a majority have died without seeing justice. But on July 14, 2016, this mostly forgotten part of U.S. history was brought back to life when the California State Board of Education approved the inclusion of World War II in the Philippines in the revised history curriculum framework for the state. This seminal part of WWII history is now included in the Grade 11 U.S. history (Chapter 16) curriculum framework. The approval is the culmination of many years of hard work from the Filipino community with the support of different organizations across the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Ranger Handbook) Is Mainly Written for U.S
    SH 21-76 UNITED STATES ARMY HANDBOOK Not for the weak or fainthearted “Let the enemy come till he's almost close enough to touch. Then let him have it and jump out and finish him with your hatchet.” Major Robert Rogers, 1759 RANGER TRAINING BRIGADE United States Army Infantry School Fort Benning, Georgia FEBRUARY 2011 RANGER CREED Recognizing that I volunteered as a Ranger, fully knowing the hazards of my chosen profession, I will always endeavor to uphold the prestige, honor, and high esprit de corps of the Rangers. Acknowledging the fact that a Ranger is a more elite Soldier who arrives at the cutting edge of battle by land, sea, or air, I accept the fact that as a Ranger my country expects me to move further, faster, and fight harder than any other Soldier. Never shall I fail my comrades I will always keep myself mentally alert, physically strong, and morally straight and I will shoulder more than my share of the task whatever it may be, one hundred percent and then some. Gallantly will I show the world that I am a specially selected and well trained Soldier. My courtesy to superior officers, neatness of dress, and care of equipment shall set the example for others to follow. Energetically will I meet the enemies of my country. I shall defeat them on the field of battle for I am better trained and will fight with all my might. Surrender is not a Ranger word. I will never leave a fallen comrade to fall into the hands of the enemy and under no circumstances will I ever embarrass my country.
    [Show full text]
  • Children in Armed Conflict: Philippines
    CHILDREN IN ARMED CONFLICT: PHILIPPINES Processes and Lessons Learned | 2009-2017 Action Plan on the Recruitment and Use of Children in Armed Conflict United Nations and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front FOREWORD The successful implementation of the UN-MILF Action Plan was a significant milestone in the international community’s global commitment to fulfil the rights of children in situations of armed conflict. The eight-year implementation started in 2009 and ended in July 2017 with the disengagement of nearly 2000 children and the delisting of the MILF- BIAF from the annexes of the UN Secretary General’s Report. Reaching its completion was challenging and required tremendous effort by all involved. I am pleased to acknowledge the commitment of the Government of the Philippines and the MILF leadership toward ensuring compliance with the provisions of the Action Plan. Particular appreciation is also owed to the Office of the Special Representative of the Secretary General for Children and Armed Conflict for its oversight and guidance, and to the United Nations in the Philippines. We also recognize the large number of our civil society partners in Mindanao who worked tirelessly on the ground to achieve the results highlighted here. This report acknowledges their special contributions. This report is a valuable resource, locally and internationally, for understanding how to effectively implement a plan that has successfully stopped and now prevents recruitment and use of children by armed groups. However, while we celebrate this success, we must not forget that armed groups in Mindanao and many other locations around the world are still recruiting and using children in their struggles.
    [Show full text]
  • The Philippine Army World War II
    The Philippine Army World War II The commonwealth of the Philippines was governed on the structure of outmoded strategies of former colonial governments. New goals included the development of an independent military force, was widely scattered and inadequate. The United States government in principal provided token support until the threat of war surfaced. The recruiting and funding of the Philippine Scouts was under the jurisdiction of the United States, resulted in the establishment and foundation of The Philippine Army. President Delano Roosevelt of the United States commissioned General Douglas MacArthur, to become the mentor of the infant military force. The appointment was withdrawn, caused by internal colonial American petty political dissention and jealousies. MacArthur retired from American military service in 1937 to accept the Baton of Field Marshall, of the Philippines, by an Act of the commonwealth government to retain the General's services. General MacArthur had envisioned the growing threat of war in the far-east. He addressed his underlying concept which called for the full support of Commonwealth government and instilled upon President Manuel Quezon to guard against the probable menace. The young nation was practically defenseless in 1947 to cope with threat that within five years became a reality. Under MacArthur’s expertise and direction were implemented the insurmountable plans for the defense of hundreds of islands in the archipelago. On July 27, 1941, war clouds were brewing, and the retired General was recalled to active American military service this time to energize and muster the infant Philippine Army. By this act, the United States was concerned in the continued sovereignty of the Philippines.
    [Show full text]