Three Years of Neurohistory, 2 : 2007-2010
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
To Access Digital Resources Including: Blog Posts Videos Online Appendices
To access digital resources including: blog posts videos online appendices and to purchase copies of this book in: hardback paperback ebook editions Go to: https://www.openbookpublishers.com/product/800 Open Book Publishers is a non-profit independent initiative. We rely on sales and donations to continue publishing high-quality academic works. ANZUS and the Early Cold War With and Without Galton Vasilii Florinskii and the Fate of Eugenics in Russia NIKOLAI KREMENTSOV WITH AND WITHOUT GALTON About the Publisher Open Book Publishers is a not-for-profit, scholar-led Open Access academic press and we are dedicated to revolutionising academic publishing, breaking down the barriers of high prices and restricted circulation so that outstanding academic books are available for everyone to read and share. If you believe that knowledge should be available to everyone, you can support our work with a monthly pledge or a one-off donation and become part of the OBP community: https://www.openbookpublish/pledge About the Author Nikolai Krementsov is a Professor at the Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Technology, University of Toronto (Canada). He has published several monographs and numerous articles on various facets of the history of science, medicine, and literature in Russia and the Soviet Union. His latest publications include A Martian Stranded on Earth: Alexander Bogdanov, Blood Transfusions, and Proletarian Science (2011), Revolutionary Experiments: The Quest for Immortality in the Bolshevik Science and Fiction (2014), and The Lysenko Controversy as a Global Phenomenon (2017), 2 vols. (co-edited with William deJong-Lambert). With and Without Galton Vasilii Florinskii and the Fate of Eugenics in Russia Nikolai Krementsov https://www.openbookpublishers.com © 2018 Nikolai Krementsov This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0). -
Shirak Region Which Was Also After the Great Flood
NOTES: ARAGATSOTN a traveler’s reference guide ® Aragatsotn Marz : 3 of 94 - TourArmenia © 2008 Rick Ney ALL RIGHTS RESERVED - www.TACentral.com a traveler’s reference guide ® Aragatsotn Marz : 4 of 94 - TourArmenia © 2008 Rick Ney ALL RIGHTS RESERVED - www.TACentral.com a traveler’s reference guide ® soil surprisingly rich when irrigated. Unlike Talin INTRODUCTIONB Highlights the Southeast has deeper soils and is more heavily ARAGATSOTN marz Area: 2753 sq. km farmed. The mountain slopes receive more rainfall Population: 88600 ²ð²¶²ÌàîÜ Ù³ñ½ then on the plateau and has thick stands of Marz Capital: Ashtarak • Visit Ashtarak Gorge and the three mountain grass and wildflowers throughout the sister churches of Karmravor, B H Distance from Yerevan: 22 km By Rick Ney summer season. Tsiranavor and Spitakavor (p. 10)H MapsB by RafaelH Torossian Marzpetaran: Tel: (232) 32 368, 32 251 EditedB by BellaH Karapetian Largest City: Ashtarak • Follow the mountain monastery trail to Aragatsotn (also spelled “Aragadzotn”) is named Tegher (pp. 18),H Mughni (p 20),H TABLEB OF CONTENTS Hovhanavank (pp. 21)H and after the massive mountain (4095m / 13,435 ft.) that hovers over the northern reaches of Armenia. Saghmosavank (pp. 23)H INTRODUCTIONH (p. 5) The name itself means ‘at the foot of’ or ‘the legs NATUREH (p. 6) • See Amberd Castle, summer home for of’ Aragats, a fitting title if ever there was one for DOH (p. 7) Armenia’s rulers (p 25)H this rugged land that wraps around the collapsed WHEN?H (p. 8) volcano. A district carved for convenience, the • Hike up the south peak of Mt. -
Alexei Kojevnikov Alexei Kojevnikov Since 1948, the Lysenko Case Has Become Generally Known As the Symbol of the Ideological
GAMES OF SOVIET DEMOCRACY IDEOLOGICAL DISCUSSIONS IN SCIENCES AROUND 1948 RECONSIDERED. Alexei Kojevnikov* Alexei Kojevnikov Alexei Kojevnikov Since 1948, the Lysenko case has become generally known as the symbol of the ideological dic- tate in science and its damaging consequences. It is often explained that in the years following World War II, the Stalinist leadership launched an ideological and nationalistic campaign aimed at the creation of Marxist-Leninist and/or distinctively Russian, non-Western science. Concepts and theories which were found idealistic or bourgeois were banned and their supporters si- lenced. In no other science was this process completed to the same degree as in biology after the infamous Session of the Soviet Academy of Agricultural Sciences in August 1948, at which Lysenko declared the victory of his "Michurinist biology" over presumably idealistic "formal" genetics. The August Session, in turn, served as the model for a number of other ideological dis- cussions in various scholarly disciplines. This widely accepted interpretation encounters, however, two serious difficulties. The first ari- ses from a selective focus on one particular debate which fits stereotypes the best. It was critics of the Stalinist system who singled out the Lysenko case as the most important example of the application of Soviet ideology to science. The communist party viewed it differently. It did re- gard the event as a major achievement of the party ideological work and a great contribution to the progress of science (until 1964 when the mistake was quietly acknowledged). But what is more interesting and less expected, is that communists claimed five main ideological successes in science rather than one. -
With and Without Galton Vasilii Florinskii and the Fate of Eugenics in Russia
With and Without Galton Vasilii Florinskii and the Fate of Eugenics in Russia Nikolai Krementsov Publisher: Open Book Publishers Year of publication: 2018 Published on OpenEdition Books: 21 March 2019 Serie: OBP collection Electronic ISBN: 9791036525063 http://books.openedition.org Printed version ISBN: 9781783745111 Number of pages: xxvi + 668 Electronic reference KREMENTSOV, Nikolai. With and Without Galton: Vasilii Florinskii and the Fate of Eugenics in Russia. New edition [online]. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers, 2018 (generated 04 mai 2019). Available on the Internet: <http://books.openedition.org/obp/7333>. ISBN: 9791036525063. © Open Book Publishers, 2018 Creative Commons - Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported - CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 WITH AND WITHOUT GALTON About the Publisher Open Book Publishers is a not-for-profit, scholar-led Open Access academic press and we are dedicated to revolutionising academic publishing, breaking down the barriers of high prices and restricted circulation so that outstanding academic books are available for everyone to read and share. If you believe that knowledge should be available to everyone, you can support our work with a monthly pledge or a one-off donation and become part of the OBP community: https://www.openbookpublish/pledge About the Author Nikolai Krementsov is a Professor at the Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Technology, University of Toronto (Canada). He has published several monographs and numerous articles on various facets of the history of science, medicine, and literature in Russia and the Soviet Union. His latest publications include A Martian Stranded on Earth: Alexander Bogdanov, Blood Transfusions, and Proletarian Science (2011), Revolutionary Experiments: The Quest for Immortality in the Bolshevik Science and Fiction (2014), and The Lysenko Controversy as a Global Phenomenon (2017), 2 vols. -
Psicologia Histórico- Cultural Da Memória
SANDRO HENRIQUE VIEIRA DE ALMEIDA PSICOLOGIA HISTÓRICO- CULTURAL DA MEMÓRIA Educação: Psicologia da Educação – PUC/SP São Paulo – 2008 SANDRO HENRIQUE VIEIRA DE ALMEIDA PSICOLOGIA HISTÓRICO- CULTURAL DA MEMÓRIA Tese apresentada à Banca Examinadora da Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, como exigência parcial para a obtenção do grau de Doutor em Educação: Psicologia da Educação, sob a orientação da Profa. Dra. Mitsuko Aparecida Makino Antunes. Educação: Psicologia da Educação – PUC/SP São Paulo – 2008 ________________________________________ ________________________________________ ________________________________________ ________________________________________ ________________________________________ Dedico este trabalho àqueles que permitiram que esta tese se realizasse AGRADECIMENTOS Diversas pessoas contribuíram para que este trabalho fosse realizado e a elas agradeço. Infelizmente não posso escrever o nome de todos. Assim, agradeço especialmente - primeiramente aos meus pais Vera e Sérgio por caminharem junto comigo nas descobertas e obstáculos da vida; - à Adriana e Emerson e ao meu irmão Sérgio pelo amor e incentivo; - à Mimi pelas preciosas orientações e confiança; - ao amor, carinho e ininterrupto incentivo de minha sempre linda Flávia; - às preciosas sugestões, correções e auxílios de José Paulo Netto e Betty Oliveira, cada qual com suas especificidades, no entendimento do marxismo, educação e União Soviética; - à juventude de amigos – Adriana Eiko, Marcelo, Fernanda, Netto, Celinha, Adriana Louro, Flávia – que dia-a-dia -
M^^^S^^^Fflu^Nro^M
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HIGH-ENERGY PHYSICS CERN COURIER VOLUME 44 NUMBER 9 NOVEMBER 2004 m^^^S^^^fflu^nro^M ACCELERATORS ANNIVERSARY Researchers make breakthrough ICTP celebrates four decades of with laser-driven plasmas p5 international co-operation p30 Designing for the Next Generation I fat6" VOYAGE] Our experience, future GLASSMAN EUROPE Tel: +44(0) 1256 883007 One supplier, Glassman Europe, provides design engineers Fax: +44 (0) 1256 883017 with a comprehensive range of well regulated high-voltage GLASSMAN USA Tel: (908) 638-3800 Fax: (908) 638-3700 DC power supplies, boasting a unique combination of GLASSMAN JAPAN high-performance, small-size and light-weight products for Tel: (045)902-9988 Fax: (045) 902-2268 years ahead. GLASSMAN J! europe www.glassmanhv.com CONTENTS Covering current developments in high- energy physics and related fields worldwide CERN Courier is distributed to member-state governments, institutes and laboratories affiliated with CERN, and to their personnel. It is published monthly, except for January and August, in English and French editions. The views expressed are not CERN necessarily those of the CERN management. Editor Christine Sutton CERN, 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland E-mail: [email protected] Fax:+41 (0)22 785 0247 Web: cerncourier.com COURIER Advisory board James Gillies, Rolf Landua and Maximilian Metzger VOLUME 44 NUMBER 9 NOVEMBER 2004 Laboratory correspondents: Argonne National Laboratory (US): D Ayres Brookhaven National Laboratory (US): P Yamin Cornell University (US): D G Cassel DESY Laboratory -
President of Stalin' S Academy
President of Stalin' s Academy The Mask and Responsibility of Sergei Vavilov By Alexei Kojevnikov * T HAS BECOME A CLICH$ when speaking about Sergei Vavilov (1891-1951), to I start with a dramatic comparison of two fates: that of Sergei himself-a high-ranking official, president of the Soviet Academy of Sciences at the apogee of Stalin's rule, 1945- 1951; and that of his brother Nikolai-a famous geneticist who became a victim of the purges and starved in prison in 1943. Although the general reader may find it paradoxical, such a pattern was not unusual for that epoch. Participants in political games accepted the cruelty and dangers of that life as inevitable, and even Politburo members-Viacheslav Molotov and Mikhail Kalinin--could have convicts among their closest relatives. Sergei Vavilov proved himself a true politician who both administered the scientific academy and delivered the required political speeches during a time characterized by the cold war, Communist totalitarianism, nationalism (including anti-Semitism), Stalin's personality cult, and ideological purges in culture and science. He managed to perform this job without committing any major political mistakes and died in 1951 in full official recognition; Nikita Khrushchev, speaking at his funeral, called Vavilov a "non-Party Bolshevik," a laudatory term for one who was not formally a member of the Communist Party.' (See Figure 1.) However, Vavilov did not fit any of the stereotypical images of Soviet officials-the rude and energetic revolutionary, the gloomy apparatchik, and so forth. He was a phleg- matic and solitary intellectual whose hobby was searching for rare books among the heaps in secondhand bookstores and who translated Isaac Newton's Lectiones opticae into Rus- sian. -
History Corner at FENS Forum 2018
[Type text] [Type text] History Corner at FENS Forum 2018 Poster abstracts 1. History Online Projects 1. A Brain Museum Tour of Europe 2. A Virtual Museum of Irish Brain Science 3. Broca's brains: An example of the importance of brain museums for modern neuroscience 4. COSE DA PAZZI E CERUSICI DEI NERVI - Notes for a history of neuroscience in Campania 5. Discovery of the first neurotranmitter receptor 6. Discovering the History of Spanish Neuroscience 7. European Innovations in Sensory Neuroprostheses 8. Friedrich Sanides: A unifying framework of cortical organization with ontogenetic, phylogenetic and functional ramifications 9. Heinrich Obersteiner and the Foundation of Neuroscience at 19th C. Vienna 10. Neuroscience Giants 11. Olga Vinogradova (1929-2001): role of the hippocampus in selection and registration of information 12. Orbeli’s Phenomenon 13. Platon Kostyuk - founder of Ukrainian school of neuroscientists 14. Stars and thorns of the Ukrainian neuroscientist Oleksandr Chernyakhivsky 15. The legacy of Russian School of Neurophysiology 16. The Magnus-Rademaker Neurocinematography Film Collection: European pioneers of the study of body posture and reflexes 17. The pioneers of neuroscience in Poland: Waclaw Blazey Orlowsky and Maximillian Rose 2. FENS Member Societies 1. A curious Berlin perspective 2. British Neuroscience Association: fifty years young and ever stronger 3. Consolidating Brain Chemistry in Europe: Reflections on Four Decades of the European Society for Neurochemistry 4. French Traditions in Microscopic Neuroanatomy 5. Galectin 1 expression profile in CNS 6. Historical Contribution of Irish Neuroscientists and Physicians to Cannabinoid Research and Cannabis as Medicine 7. History of the European Sleep Research Society 8. -
Lysenkoism Against Genetics: the Meeting of the Lenin All-Union Academy of Agricultural Sciences of August 1948, Its Background, Causes, and Aftermath
| PERSPECTIVES Lysenkoism Against Genetics: The Meeting of the Lenin All-Union Academy of Agricultural Sciences of August 1948, Its Background, Causes, and Aftermath Svetlana A. Borinskaya,*,1 Andrei I. Ermolaev,† and Eduard I. Kolchinsky† *N. I. Vavilov Institute of General Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 119991, Russia and †St. Petersburg Branch of the S.I. Vaviolv Institute for the History of Science and Technology, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia ORCID IDs: 0000-0002-9204-2341 (S.A.B.); 0000-0002-7935-8632 (E.I.K.) ABSTRACT Progress in genetics and evolutionary biology in the young Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) was hindered in the 1930s by the agronomist Trofim Lysenko, who believed that acquired traits are inherited, claimed that heredity can be changed by “educating” plants, and denied the existence of genes. Lysenko was supported by Communist Party elites. Lysenko termed his set of ideas and agricultural techniques “Michurinism,” after the name of the plant breeder Ivan Michurin, but they are currently known as Lysen- koism. Although Michurinism opposed biological science, Lysenko took up one academic position after another. In 1929, Nikolai Vavilov founded the Lenin All-Union Academy of Agricultural Sciences and became its head; it directed the development of sciences underpinning plant and animal breeding in the Soviet Union. Vavilov was dismissed in 1935 and later died in prison, while Lysenko occupied his position. The triumph of Lysenkoism became complete and genetics was fully defeated in August 1948 at a session of the academy headed by Lysenko. The session was personally directed by Joseph Stalin and marked the USSR’s commitment to developing a national science, separated from the global scientific community. -
From Newspeak to Cyberspeak: a History of Soviet Cybernetics
FROM EWSPEAKN TO A HISTORY OF SOVIET CYBERNETICS SLAVA GEROVITCH From Newspeak to Cyberspeak This Page Intentionally Left Blank From Newspeak to Cyberspeak A History of Soviet Cybernetics Slava Gerovitch The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England ©2002 Massachusetts Institute of Technology All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from the publisher. Set in Sabon by The MIT Press. Printed and bound in the United States of America. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Gerovitch, Slava. From newspeak to cyberspeak : a history of Soviet cybernetics / Slava Gerovitch. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-262-07232-7 (hard cover : alk. paper) 1. Cybernetics—Soviet Union—History. I. Title. Q305 .G47 2002 003'.5'0947—dc21 2001056241 for my mother, Raisa Sklyar This Page Intentionally Left Blank Contents Preface and Acknowledgements xi Introduction: Soviet Science and Politics through the Prism of Language 1 1The Cold War in Code Words: The Newspeak of Soviet Science 11 Balancing Military and Ideological Priorities for Cold War Science 14 Shifting Boundaries between Knowledge and Ideology 18 Newspeak: The Fundamentals 21 Scientific Newspeak 26 “Formalism” as a Floating Signifier 31 From Formulas to “Formalism” in Mathematics 33 From Literary Form to “Formalism” in Linguistics 37 The Specter of “Idealism” in Physiology 42 2 Cyberspeak: -
Rituals of Stalinist Culture at Work: Science and the Games of Intraparty Democracy Circa 1948
Rituals of Stalinist Culture at Work: Science and the Games of Intraparty Democracy circa 1948 ALEXEI KOJEVNIKOV We cannot do without self-criticism,Aleksei Maksimovich. Without it, stag- nation, corruption of the apparat, and an increase of bureaucratization would be inevitable. Of course, self-criticism provides arguments for our enemies, you are completely right here. But it also gives arguments (and a push) for our own progressive movement. Joseph Stalin to Maxim Gorky, 1930. TheLysenko case has become a symbol of the ideological dictate in science and its damaging consequences. It is often explained that in the years following World War 11, the Stalinist leadership launched an ideological and nationalistic campaign aimed at the creation of a Marxist-Leninist and/or distinctively Russian, non-West- ern science. Concepts and theories which were found idealistic or bourgeois were banned, their supporters silenced. In no other science was this process completed to the same degree as in biology after the infamous August 1948 Session of the Soviet Academy of Agricultural Sciences, at which Trofim Lysenko declared the victory of his "Michurinist biology" over presumably idealistic "formal" genetics. The August Session, in turn, served as the model for a number of other ideological discussions in various scholarly disciplines. This widely accepted interpretation, however, encounters two serious difficul- ties. The first arises from a selective focus on one particular debate which best fits the Earlier versions of this paper were presented at the RussianISoviet History Colloquium at the University of Chicago, the 1995 Midwest Russian History Workshop, the Max-Planck-Institut fiir Wissen- schaftsgeschichte, and several other meetings and colloquia. -
Review Sergei Davidenkov, the Father of Soviet Neurogenetics
Review Neurosciences and History 2018; 6(1): 21-27 Sergei Davidenkov, the father of Soviet neurogenetics M. Marco Igual Department of Neurology. Hospital Parc Taulí, Sabadell, Spain. ABSTRACT Sergei Davidenkov (1880-1961) was one of the most important Soviet neurologists of the first half of the 20th century, and the founder of neurogenetics in the Soviet Union. Davidenkov mainly studied hereditary diseases, focusing on neuromuscular disorders. He was the first author to describe scapuloperoneal amyotrophy, also known as Davidenkov syndrome, as well as hereditary myoclonic dystonia. He spent most of his career in Leningrad and had a close relationship with Ivan Pavlov and other members of his school, and became interested in eugenics. A tireless researcher, he published numerous studies and created a fruitful school of neurologists and geneticists. As did many other scientists of his time, he suffered the injustices of Stalinism; in 1948, he was forced to give up his studies on genetics and lost a son in the Gulag. KEYWORDS Hereditary myoclonic dystonia, Ivan Pavlov, neurogenetics, scapuloperoneal amyotrophy, Sergei Davidenkov, Stalinism Introduction literature. In the West, Davidenkov is essentially known for his descriptions of two syndromes, which were The great Soviet neurologist Sergei Davidenkov published in English and in German. This is the price (Давиденков) is considered the father of neurogenetics many scientists and intellectuals have to pay for not in his country and developed a productive school of systematically publishing in an international lingua neurologists and geneticists (Figure 1). Unlike their franca. Despite the scarcity of available information, we predecessors (Kojevnikov, Bekhterev, Rossolimo, Minor, hope this article contributes to the recognition of the and other well-known scientists), the neurologists figure of Sergei Davidenkov.