P ARIPEX -INDIANJOURNALOFRESEARCH identified weresent totheWesternRegionalStation Akurdi, (1991) using in placed and were water. fishing, fish abundance T Collection, aquaculture. construction is and . the The Study Material occur Lake, the reservoir 2013). and also aquatic palatable valuable freshwater which approximately world andlivesinalltypesofaquatichabitats.Aroundthe Fishes employment socio-economic day thesearealsoutilizedforfisheries.Theseimportantfrom generation, of manmade, freshwater constitutes developing bodies Water Introduction w S. Patole* Manisha U.Patil o of w

their events Panzara s present 74 faunastic w specimens aquaculture, used scale

t ABSTRACT 945 snapped. during u and .w The different 2500 constitutes area 0 is in d i.e. For Nakana

Simpson’s diversity including Whereas Cyprinidae balanced Fishes Pune and 43' food orldwidejournals abdomen brought y for life, 4 source and m,

fishing food as geographical formula prompting % lakes, t and having identification of only 31.82" h recourses River, identification study countries, (11%) irrigation, the June of (Khan a (MS). maximum

e chain, It formalin Nakana Methods are diversity

Jayaram genetic 22,000 1,570 the For is item, literature were Lake i present indices c point a of is ponds single them h ecosystem. family utmost was 2013 stimulate near Reciprocal aquatic great half minute and was are done t et lake advanced E). were h protein, nutrient y is al are for purchased Lake conducted o found where drinking on construction

Morane of library of although This found ., fish to a preserved. of location is height economic such f to species (2002). and study. regularly. a .com 1991). Clupiedae, marine NAKANA LAKE,DISTRICT-(M.S.)INDIA. A CHECKLISTOFFRESHWATERICHTHYOFAUNA and human viz., important manmade for the u noted. view, May creatures, ORIGINAL RESEARCHPAPER the fraction freshwater laboratory and was n is human species a reservoirs index in cycling as drinking in as earthen study Present to for l total taxonomic

The is earth. 2014. Village, India Day and selected Shannon-Wiener preservation large d of addition of be as (Umbarhande Those Dist-Dhule, Dhule.*Corresponding Dept Dept. from 18.41 the i at consumption. possible Small importance. v (1/D), each It the The e aim i.e. dominant number it morphological interest Nakana flood (1994); r for of have is and among lake, perfectly Mastacembalidae, s fishes Many amount lake water has study i In also and fish lake t etc. Tah. fisherman less of of fishes y water m. survival. which specimens contribute as Margalef's of , ecosystem India to

study this control been selected future having potential Zoology, used r a Main species are were has than wash edible and e Lake. in Zoology, supply, these of Talwar reveals case being l form a study adopted of

were Indian nature et of bodies t vertebrates vital 424304. (20 these are i for the Dist. They v recorded given 1% fish al

purpose use diversity study. e catchment It them The etc at water 930 fish 0

., major characters, aquaculture. as

was (5%). an from irrigation were and 52' not resources was s Richness photographs services. identified total of 2011). the - history p in of (WRS,ZSI),

are (Rao VVM’s, are Dhule freshwater freshwater species species e for but an important for providing 56.27" c built V. The medicine with the to Jhingran Channidae, properly in i bulk sight Nakana e incision directly 20 part index behind

out mostly power now s Authors aquatic in reveal et U Fish

them fresh is (MS) total area over a index and Fish species tap the (30%). Author are are full al. for .Patil n fin by of of of N is S.G.Patil d a (H), , (MD) life. documented Simpson’s Arts Fallowed Ciclidae, belonging 16 Sonawane River. belonging Recently, . w (60%) member Dhule. recorded S to District, t different Cypriniformes, higher evident Due and al period fishes (M.S.). families and35generaduringtheirstudyonKrishnaRiveratWai et and (2010) reportedthe60speciesoffishesbelongingto15families corroborated Orders, The with period. total During Results 6. 5. 4. 3. 2. 1. Data about determine and of For h i Freshwater

l i and e u (2017) t al 14 diverse

h genera, r quantitative Pielou's Margalef's Simpson's Simpson's Simpson's Shannon 45

i study 36 to Arts, i

(2012) Order, f and Pandhakar, c 20 analysis or 6 genera Pielou’s fish h belonging Patole Cypriniformes on more population. Jayabhaye genera These

the genera t in The m Maharashtra. 12 and by h Dominance species of s Gobidae, freshwater recorded 22 y e t Pimpaldari the species.

water findings to to Late a o and the s Science Siluridae, the Families, order entire Dwivedi Family 11 had t evenness f scientific V fecundity i Discussion a bodies fish 5 (2014) a o – belong 5 falling These Lake olume-7 |Issue-7July-2018PRINTISSNNo2250-1991 with u Evenness n from reciprocal Index Dominance n record Weiner orders, Patole families during Index,(1958): those n diversity d orders, way s reported were Dr. a bodies Cyprinoformes

to species 2016). and study

and O t 143 and showed Dominance h o earlier Claridae, River belong st again comprise 6 of under of reservoirs. index

f et r Bagridae tank, and to B. 18 Index,

name, o (2017) They were e of Lahane order their of collected families status 18 Index, Diversity P u og suitable water fish and index 12 al 5 different a were g Index S. genera indices major fish . With l from 51

families h l a orders, recorded Commerce o Index,(1949) Dist. researchers (D), (2017) revealed s

4 to species study families s also that Desale (1966): 6 - KEY WORDS: Zoology Shannon-wiener DiversityIndex. Conservation, Aquaculture, D si local species reported (MD): were N was (1963): Orders diversity (J). assessment, 6 computed (2013) Heteropneustidae and variety f orders h i Simpson’s o and l Panzara carp; = of environmental help Hingoli Sakhre e u orders, from r = were and recorded reported to g 1/D, l m on fish e 12 and name fish a 1-D, illustrated shared Ambassidae revealed MD

e including o 13 (J): 32 21 assess and s a of density (Cypriniformes, n (H): Ujani 20 families of were Science ) from of n variety 20 . Nakana dominated

by 43 species

fish J species d viz; = fishes 12 genera (M.S.). and r :(D): River, P = e fishes species.

following of H= College, R=S-1/Ln(n) in fish 18 a calculating genera s index N H/Ln*S species families by species t 27 e wetland observed species Nakane, how ol Sarwade the a recent r Joshi -∑Pi D= of that v in n genera. 4 species e had belonging and other o d Recently belonging

Tahsil Lake,

condition of species and Cypriniformes Tabel-1. orders, i during each Cyprinidae, fish college, r u ∑ a of

(In diverse Our n r fishes from and (2002) from n(n-1)/N(N-1), 58 i b diversity been 22 d n belonging and from diversity years a formulae, maintain (M.S.). Pi),

Sakri, species authors Sulwade with 21 r during belonging , Perciformes, P O and the genera.

findings fish The a Cobitidae their 22 the 23 d major s (46.55%). belonging Sharma t species observed, m Tapi i to i relatively (Kawade reported s l the various to (10%).

genera. families t a Khillare Sakri, family species Paisuni indices r Kharat ( the n Dist. Dist- 20 (I-D), i along order study study c a River from 13 the bulk t to lake was b and The 09

are we 14 a to of et i n d 5 - ) PARIPEX - INDIAN JOURNAL OF RESEARCH Volume-7 | Issue-7 | July-2018 | PRINT ISSN No 2250-1991 Dedorgaon dams of Dhule District. Very recently Bharman et al 4 Simpson's Dominance Index (D) (Simpson, 0.0713 (2018) recorded 49 fish species from 4 orders, 11 families and 28 1949) genera from Kaladan River and its four major tributaries of Kaladan 5 Simpson's Index of Diversity (1-D) 0.9291 River, Indo-Myanmar biodiversity hotspot, Mizoram state of India. 6 Simpson's Reciprocal Index (1/D) 14.0469 7 Margalef's Index (MD) (Marglef, 1958) 7.1315 In present investigation family wise percentage of fishes is shown 8 Pielou's Evenness Index (J) (Pielou, 1966) 0.6073 in fig.-2, in which Family Cyprinidae is dominant with 6 species (30%) over all the reported families. Ambassidae, Bagridae and The present investigation focused richness, abundance and Siluridae were having 2 species (10%). Family Clupiedae, different diversity indices of freshwater body Nakana Lake. The Mastacembalidae, Channidae, Ciclidae, Gobidae, Claridae, lake represents richer value about fish species i.e. 20 and Heteropneustidae and Cobitidae including single species of each abundance is 252. The value of the Shannon-Weiner index was contribute (5%). (1.7550) shows greater diversity. The index of dominance is useful for determining particular fish species dominating by that habitat. Every natural ecosystem doesn't have equal abundance, it shows In Simpson’s Dominance Index quantify the probability that two variety of species which differ in their relative abundance and individuals randomly selected from a sample will belongs to the richness. During tenure of this research work total 252 catches of same species. The value of this index was (0.0713), which ranges 20 fish species represented by 12 families. between 0 and 1. If a value of this index was 0 stands for infinite diversity and 1 indicates no diversity. When value of lake is low, the Ÿ Family Cyprinidae found to be dominant group with 6 species implication is that “Dominance is shared by all the species of that in the assemblage composition in which Cirrhinus reba was community” Cummins (2002). To get over this problem ‘D’ is less abundant, Puntius sophore, Rasbora doniconius and subtracted from 1 to give the Simpson’s index of diversity (1-D) Labeo boggut were found to be abundant as well as Cyprinus which was (0.9291) and Simpson’s reciprocal Index (1/D) was carpio and Labeo rohita were moderately abundant. (14.0469). These three are the closely related indices shows the Ÿ Family Siluridae shown 2 species Ompok bimaculatus was same diversity. The species richness is calculated by Margalef’s found to be less abundant and Wallago attu was rear. Index (MD) was (7.1315) and evenness is by Pielou’s index (J) was Ÿ Family Bagridae represents 2 species Mystus bleekeri and (0.6073). Our findings are supported by earlier studies like Mystus vittatus were less abundant and moderately abundant Mandal, et al (2010); Shukla and Sing (2013) are calculated the values of diversity of two floodplain lakes Gopalnagar and Damur respectively. of West Bengal and Ami river respectively. Ÿ Family Ambassidae shown 2 species Chanda nama and Parambasis ranga was abundant and less abundant Conclusion respectively. Freshwater resources are nothing but the life supporting system. If Ÿ Family Heteropneustidae had shown Heteropneustes fossilis they exploited economic purpose there are not beneficial for species was rare. human society. Aquatic environment and his biota necessary to Ÿ Claridae family includes Clarius batrachus was moderately save and kept the ecosystem undisturbed. Nakana Lake is abundant. manmade water reservoir, it is away from dumping of industrial Ÿ Ciclidae family represents exotic species Oreochromis effluents, and drainage of city and garbage. It is dynamic wetland mossambicus was found to be abundant. ecosystem but the ichthyofauna of this lake being disturbed due to Ÿ Family Gobidae includes Glossogobius guiris was rare. some anthropogenic activities including over fishing with Ÿ Channidae family conveys Channa punctata was less fingerlings and juveniles. At the time of religious festivals huge abundant. idols of Lord Ganesha and Durga were disposed into the lake. Ÿ Family Mastacembalidae includes Mastacembelus armatus Every year this type of siltation reduced the capacity of water body. was found to be rare On the other hand presence of exotic fish species in the reservoir Ÿ Family Clupeidae represents species Tenulosa ilisha was directly affects on commercially important major carps. The abundant. diversity of fish fauna of Nakana Lake is richer hence there is urgent need to create awareness among fishermen and local peoples Rao, et al (2013) recorded 63 fish species from river Champavathi about the importance of lake. Government fishery department (Vizianagaram, A.P., India). They showed 13 species were and NGO’s has to take lead and conserve them for future abundant, 15 moderate, 23 species common and 12 were rare. generation. In the Present Investigation Chanda nama and Oreochromis mossambicus species were found to be abundant and Acknowledgement Heteropneustes fossilis showed least count. Thirumala, et al (2011) Authors are thankful to Director, Western Regional Station, reported the exotic fish species Oreochromis mossambicus Zoological Survey of India for their keen interest in identification of established rapidly and widely. As per local fisherman's fishes. We are also thankful to Principal, S. G. Patil College, Sakri information catching of tilapia is increasing over the years. During Dist- Dhule for providing Central Library facility for fish literature. post monsoon season it dominates the indigenous fish species. There is no demand hence fishermen treat this unwanted fish. Table-1, Ichthyofaunal diversity of Nakana Lake during June, 2013 to May, 2014. Biological Indices Order Family Scientific Name Local Status Biological diversity can be measured by many different ways i.e. Name Richness and Evenness. Different kinds of organisms are present in CYPRINIFOR Cyrinidae 1.Cirrhinus reba Reba R a particular area is called richness while evenness compares the MES (Hamilton) similarity of population of each species. Diversity depends on 2. Cyprinus carpio Kombda MA those, both things are increases, diversity automatically increases. (Linnaeus) Shannon and Wiener index is also an important tool for 3. Puntius sophore Dhebri A quantifying diversity of particular habitat. By using different (Hamilton) formulas we calculated values of same indices given in table - 2. 4.Rasbora doniconius Zora A (Hamilton) Table:-2, Fish species richness, abundance, dominance and 5. Labeo rohita Rav MA diversity indices of Nakana Lake, Dhule. (Hamilton) Sr. No. Index Value 6. Labeo boggut (Sykes) Ger A 1 Species Richness (S) 20 Cobitidae 7. Lepidocephalichthys Zirmuti R 2 Species abundance (N) 252 thermalis (Val) 3 Shannon-Weiner Index (H) (Shannon and 1.7550 SILURIFORM Siluridae 8. Ompok bimaculatus Raigdi LA Wiener, 1963) ES (Bloch) 14 www.worldwidejournals.com PARIPEX - INDIAN JOURNAL OF RESEARCH Volume-7 | Issue-7 | July-2018 | PRINT ISSN No 2250-1991 9. Wallago attu Papada R 10. Marglef, R., (1958). Perspective in ecological theory, Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago, USA IL-111. (Schneider) 11. Mondal, D.K., Kaviraj, A. and Saha, S. (2010). Water Quality Parameters and Fish Bagridae 10.Mystus Bleekeri Chichva LA Biodiversity Indices as Measures of Ecological Degradation: A Case Study in Two Floodplain Lakes of India, J. Wat. Res and Prot., 2, 85-92. (Day) 12. Patole, S. S., and Patil, Manisha (2009). A note on Ichthyofauna of Panzara River 11.Mystus vittatus Chichva MA (Tah. Sakri) Dist.-Dhule, Maharashtra. J. Aqua. Biol, 24 (2): 61-66. 13. Patole, S.S. (2014). Ichthyfaunal diversity of Nandurbar districts (Northwest (Hamilton) Region) of Maharashtra (India), Int. of Fisheries and Aqua. Studies, 2(2): Heteropneu 12.Heteropneustes Tochya R 167-172. stidae 14. Pielou, E.C. (1966). The measurement of diversity in different types of biological fossilis (Bloch) collections, J. Theor. Bio. 13: 131-144. 13. Clarius batrachus Mangur M 15. Rao, Chadra Sekhara, J., Simhachalam, G. and Sebastian Raju, Ch. (2013). A study (Linn.) on Ichthyofaual diversity, conservation status and anthropogenic stress of river Champavathi, Vizianagaram District (AP) India, ISSN 0975-5845, Asian J. Biol. Sci. PERCIFORMES Ambassidae 14. Chanda nama ( Kach vol. 4 (3), 418-425. Ham- Buch) masa A 16. Sakhare, V.B. and Joshi, P.K. (2002). Ecology of Palas-Nilegaon reservoir in Osmanabad District, Maharashtra, J. Aqua. Biol. 12(1): 28-31. 15. Parambasis ranga Zanzara LA 17. Sarwade, J.P. and. Khillare, Y.K (2010). Fish Diversity of Ujani Wetland, (Hamilton) Maharashtra, India. Bioscan Spl. Issue 1: 173-179. 18. Shannon, C E., and Wiener, W. (1963). The Mathematical theory of Ciclidae 16.Oreochromis Shilpi R communication, University of Illinois Press Urbana, IL, PP., 125. mossambicus (Peters) 19. Sharma, A.P., Das, M. K., Vass, K.K. and Tyagi, R.K. (2017). Patterns of fish diversity, community structure and ecological integrity of River Yamuna, India, J. Gobidae 17.Glossogobius guiris Khavlya R Aqua. Eco. Health and Manag. 20(1-2):30-42. (Hamilton) 20. Shukla, P., and Singh, A. (2013). Distribution and Diversity of Freshwater Fishes in Aami River, Gorakhpur, India, Advances in Biol. Res., 7(2):26-31. Channidae 18. Channa punctata Dok LA 21. Simpson, E. H. (1949). Measurement of diversity, Nature, Lond. 163, (4148) -688. (Bloch) 22. Sonawane, Deepali and Patole, S.S. (2017). Studies on ichthyofaunal diversity of Nakane, Sulwade and Dedorgaon Dams of Dhule District (M.S.) Golden Research SYNBRANCHI Mastacem 19. Mastacembelus Eel R Thoughts, 6(9):1-9. FORMES balidae armatus (Lacepede) 23. Talwar, P.K. and Jhingran, A.G. (1991). Inland fishes of India and adjacent countries. Oxford and IBH Publishers, New Delhi. CIUPEIFORMES Clupeidae 20. Tenulosa ilisha Bhat A 24. Thirumala, S., Kiran, B. R. and Kantraj, G. S. (2011). Fish diversity in relation to (Hamilton) masa physico-chemical characteristics of Bhadra reservoir of Karnataka, India, Adv.in Applied Sci. Res., 2(5):34-47. A-Abundant, LA=Less Abundant, MA- Moderately Abundant, R- 25. Umberhande, S.B., Jagtap, J.T. and Sonawane, S.R. (2011). Ichthyfaunal diversity from Ambadi Dam, Taluka Kannad, District Aurangabad(MS), Rec.Res.in Sci. and Rare Tech., 3(6) 34-37.

Fig.:-1, Map Showing Study area, Nakana Lake, Dhule (MS) India.

Fig.:-2, Percentage occurrence of fish families of Nakana Lake, Dhule (MS), India

References 1. Barman, A. S., Sing, M. and Pande, P.K. (2018). DNA barcoding and genetic diversity analyses of fishes of Kaladfan River of Indo-Myanmar biodiversity hotspot J. Mitochondrial DNA part A> DNA mapping, Sequencing and Analysis. 29(3): 367- 378. 2. Cummins, Hays. (2002). Paleoecology Problem Set. 3. Dey, F. (1994). The fishes of India, Burma Ceylon, fourth Indian reprint, Vol. I and II Jagmandar book agency, New Delhi. 4. Dwivedi, A. C.,Mayank, P., Tripathi, S. and Tiwari, A.(2017). Biodiversity: The Non- natives species versus the Natives species and Ecosystem functioning. J. Biodervs. Biopros. Dev., 4:164. Doi:10.4172/0214.1000164. 5. Jayabhaye, U. M. and Lahane, L.D. (2013). Studies on Ichthyfaunal Diversity of Pimpaldari Tank, Hingoli, Maharashtra, India, S.S.M. R.A E., Jaipur, (4), 54-55. 6. Jayaram, K.C. (2002). The freshwater fishes of the Indian region. Narendra Publication House, Delhi, pp., 551. 7. Kawade, S.A. and Pandhakar, A. K. (2016). Study of diversity indices fish heterogeneity of Kalu dam, Ahmednagar, Int. J. Adv. Biol. Res., 6(1): 75-78. 8. Khan, A. A., Kartha, K. N., Pery Dawson and Gorge (1991). Fish harvesting system in Indian reservoir, Proc. of Nat., Workshop on 1000 energy fishing, 8-9 August (99). 9. Kharat, S.S., Paingankar, M. and Dahanukar, N. (2012). Freshwater Fish Fauna at Wai, Northern Western Ghats, India. J. Threatened Taxa, 4(6): 2644-2652. www.worldwidejournals.com 15