Download Thesis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Download Thesis This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from the King’s Research Portal at https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/ Cyber security and the politics of time Stevens, Timothy Charles Awarding institution: King's College London The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without proper acknowledgement. END USER LICENCE AGREEMENT Unless another licence is stated on the immediately following page this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work Under the following conditions: Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non Commercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works - You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you receive permission from the author. Your fair dealings and other rights are in no way affected by the above. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 25. Sep. 2021 1 ] Cyber Security and the Politics of Time Timothy Charles Stevens Thesis submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy King’s College London Department of War Studies November 2013 2 Abstract Time is an under-represented topic in security studies and International Relations (IR). The development and implementation of security measures are often justified as necessary responses to the contemporary rate of global change yet little attention is granted time and temporality as factors influencing the politics and practices of security. This thesis proposes that security can be understood within the framework of a ‘politics of time’ (chronopolitics), in which collective perceptions of time and temporality are constitutive of security politics and practices. Its principal object is cyber security, which aims to regulate and exploit complex sociotechnical systems of networked and interdependent information technologies. The thesis examines how cyber security actors imagine time and temporality in (post)modernity and the implications of these temporal biases for the politics of cyber security. It explores how cyber security actors imagine the accelerating present and the relative deceleration of political decision-making; how apocalyptic narratives of imminent catastrophe illustrate concerns about the immanent dangers of technology; how the past is mobilised through historical analogies to understand dystopian futures; how the future is metaphorically inhabited through preparedness exercises and simulations, and literally populated through education, training and recruitment. These ‘chronotypes’ inform the cyber security imaginary and disclose a manifold of deeper chronopolitical tendencies, theorised here as the logics of assemblage, real time, event, and eschaton. The thesis makes an original contribution to IR by promoting the interdisciplinary analysis of time to help understand the politics and practices of contemporary security. Declaration The copyright of this dissertation rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without proper acknowledgement. 3 Contents Acknowledgements …………………………………………………………………………………….……... 5 1 Introduction ………………………………………………..…………………………………………………….. 6 1.1 Cyber Security ………………………………………………….……………………………….…………. 8 1.2 Imagination and Community ………………………………………………………………….……. 15 1.3 Time in International Relations ……………………….………………………………….……….. 22 1.4 Approach and Methods ………………………………….………………………….………………… 25 1.5 Thesis Structure ……………………………………..………..………….………..……………………. 30 2 Towards a Politics of Time 2.1 Introduction: From Time to Temporality …………………………………………….……..… 35 2.2 Emergent Sociotemporality ……………………………………………….……………….……….. 40 2.3 Knowing Nonhuman Temporalities …………………………………………….…….……….. 45 2.4 Now and the Present ………………………………………………………………….……….………. 50 2.5 Temporality and Narrative ………………………………………….………………………..…….. 57 2.6 The Time of Politics ………………………………………………………………….…………….……. 62 2.7 Towards a Politics of Time ………………………………………………………………….…….…. 70 3 Diagnosing the Present 3.1 Introduction: The Revolutionary Present ……………………………….……………….…… 76 3.2 Speed and Acceleration ………………………………………….…………………..……..……….. 84 3.3 Netspeed I: Acceleration ………………………………………….……………………………….…. 91 3.4 Netspeed II: Deceleration ………………………………………….…………………..……………. 101 3.5 Diagnosing the Present …………………………………………….…………….……….………….. 112 4 Imagining the Future 4.1 Introduction: Future and Futurity …………………………….………………………….………. 115 4.2 Imagination and Dystopia …………………………………………..……………………………….. 120 4.3 Catastrophe and Apocalypse ………………………………………..……………………….…….. 126 4.4 Immanence and Accident ………………………………………….…………………………….….. 135 4.5 Revelation, Transformation and Desire ………………………….………………………….… 145 4.6 Imagining the Future …………………………………………….………………………………….…. 153 4 5 Arguing Through the Past 5.1 Introduction: Past, Present and the Appeal to History ………….……………………... 157 5.2 Provocative Politics ………………………………………………….………….………………………. 167 5.3 Memory and Identity …………………………………………….………………….…………………. 178 5.4 Arguing Through the Past ………………………………….………………………….…………….. 189 6 Inhabiting the Future 6.1 Introduction: Anticipation and Preparation ……………………….…………………........ 197 6.2 Exercise and Simulation …………………………………………..………………………………….. 204 6.3 The Public Sensorium …………………………………………….………………….………………… 213 6.4 Recruitment and Education ……………………………………….……………………….……….. 223 6.5 Inhabiting the Future …………………………………………….………………………….…………. 236 7 Cyber Security and the Politics of Time 7.1 Introduction: Logics and Chronopolitics ………………………….………….…………..…… 241 7.2 The Logic of Assemblage ………………………………….…….……………………………………. 243 7.3 The Logic of Real Time ……………………………..…………………….……………………………. 249 7.4 The Logic of Event ……………………………………….……………….……………………………… 257 7.5 The Logic of Eschaton …………………………………….………………………….………………… 264 7.6 Cyber Security and the Politics of Time ………………………………………….……………. 271 8 Conclusion ………………..……………………………………………………………………….………………. 278 Reference List ………………………………………………………………………………………….………… 286 5 Acknowledgements I would like to thank David Bhowmik, Daniel Cordle, Kathryn Marie Fisher, Chris Fryer, Mike Innes, Jo Kovacik, Sean Lawson, Sam Liles and Jan Nederveen Pieterse for sharing ideas and research materials. I have benefited greatly from the collegiality and wisdom of my colleagues at King’s College London, particularly Neville Bolt, Peter McBurney, Nick Michelsen, Richard Overill, Thomas Rid and John Stone. My supervisors deserve particular gratitude: David Betz marshalled this project to completion and my debt to him is immeasurable; Theo Farrell has long been an encouraging voice without whom this thesis would not have been possible. My examiners, Christopher Coker and Andrew Hoskins, provided comments and insights I am fortunate to be able to incorporate into this work. I acknowledge the financial support of the Economic and Social Research Council (ES/H022678/1) and Charles Wolfson Townsley. I cannot thank my parents and family enough for their support and encouragement. To Lu, who makes all things possible, and Stanley, from whom I have already learnt more than he will ever know, my eternal love, thanks and appreciation. 6 1 INTRODUCTION For tribal man space was the uncontrollable mystery. For technological man it is time that occupies the same role.1 Security is an inherently temporal proposition. In the modern political philosophical tradition, security is an essential bulwark against the exigencies of an unknowable future. For Thomas Hobbes, whose Leviathan (1651) is a foundation of Western political theory, security is the antidote to a situation in which man, ‘in the care of future time, hath his heart all day long, gnawed on by feare of death, poverty, or other calamity; and has no repose, nor pause of his anxiety, but in sleep’.2 Security arises as a central feature of the social contract between people and the state, in which the pursuit and practices of security are invoked to calm the jittery present by the imposition of order on times yet to come. As Hobbes states elsewhere, diligence is always required: ‘For we cannot tell the good and bad apart, hence even if there were fewer evil men than good men, good, decent people would still be saddled with the constant need to watch, distrust, anticipate and get the better of others, and to protect themselves by all possible means’.3 Security is always an exercise in futurity, a perpetual search for ways to mitigate uncertainty and the potentialities of fear, conflict and violence, even as each living moment fades immediately into the past. Security is always political, whether we believe security to be epiphenomenal to politics or foundational of politics.4 Like security, politics is perennially concerned with time. Every political act is always a ‘process in time’, oriented towards a particular end, the conception of 1 Marshall McLuhan, The Mechanical Bride: Folklore of Industrial Man (Corte Madera, CA: Gingko Press, 2002/1951), 85. 2 Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan, ed. Richard Tuck, rev. edn. (Cambridge: Cambridge University
Recommended publications
  • Cost of a Cyber Incident)
    CO ST OF A CYBER INCIDENT: S YSTEMATIC REVIEW AND C ROSS-VALIDATION OCTOBER 26, 2020 1 Acknowledgements We are grateful to Dr. Allan Friedman, Dr. Lawrence Gordon, Jay Jacobs, Dr. Sasha Romanosky, Matthew Shabat, Kelly Shortridge, Steven Surdu, David Tobar, Brett Tucker and Sounil Yu for the review comments and helpful feedback on the earlier draft of the report. The authors would like to thank CISA staff for support and advice on this project. 2 Table of Contents 1. Objectives .................................................................................................................................................................... 7 2. Results in Brief .......................................................................................................................................................... 8 3. Analysis ...................................................................................................................................................................... 16 3.1. Per-Incident Cost and Loss Estimates .............................................................................................. 18 3.1.1. Cross-Validation: Primary Loss Data for Large and Small Incidents .................................. 20 3.1.2. Reconciliation of Per-Incident Cost Studies .................................................................................. 26 3.1.3. Per-Record Estimates ............................................................................................................................. 29 3.2. Aggregate
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 8Th International Conference on Cyber Conflict: Cyber Power
    2016 8th International Conference on Cyber Conflict: Cyber Power N.Pissanidis, H.Rõigas, M.Veenendaal (Eds.) 31 MAY - 03 JUNE 2016, TALLINN, ESTONIA 2016 8TH International ConFerence on CYBER ConFlict: CYBER POWER Copyright © 2016 by NATO CCD COE Publications. All rights reserved. IEEE Catalog Number: CFP1626N-PRT ISBN (print): 978-9949-9544-8-3 ISBN (pdf): 978-9949-9544-9-0 CopyriGHT AND Reprint Permissions No part of this publication may be reprinted, reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the NATO Cooperative Cyber Defence Centre of Excellence ([email protected]). This restriction does not apply to making digital or hard copies of this publication for internal use within NATO, and for personal or educational use when for non-profit or non-commercial purposes, providing that copies bear this notice and a full citation on the first page as follows: [Article author(s)], [full article title] 2016 8th International Conference on Cyber Conflict: Cyber Power N.Pissanidis, H.Rõigas, M.Veenendaal (Eds.) 2016 © NATO CCD COE Publications PrinteD copies OF THIS PUBlication are availaBLE From: NATO CCD COE Publications Filtri tee 12, 10132 Tallinn, Estonia Phone: +372 717 6800 Fax: +372 717 6308 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.ccdcoe.org Head of publishing: Jaanika Rannu Layout: Jaakko Matsalu LEGAL NOTICE: This publication contains opinions of the respective authors only. They do not necessarily reflect the policy or the opinion of NATO CCD COE, NATO, or any agency or any government.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyber Benefits and Risks: Quantitatively Understanding and Forecasting the Balance
    Cyber Benefits and Risks: Quantitatively Understanding and Forecasting the Balance Extended Project Report from the Frederick S. Pardee Center for International Futures Josef Korbel School of International Studies University of Denver www.pardee.du.edu September 2015 Barry B. Hughes, David Bohl, Mohammod Irfan, Eli Margolese-Malin, and José Solórzano In project collaboration with and the Table of Contents Executive Summary 4 Conceptualizing Benefits and Costs 4 Using the IFs System for Analysis 4 Background Research Foundations 5 Forecasts and Findings 9 Conclusion 11 A Final Note on Study Contributions 12 1. Introduction: Understanding and Anticipating Change in the Benefits and Costs of Cyber Technology 13 2. ICT and Cyber Development Indices 18 Indices Replicated in the IFs Forecasting System 18 ICT Development Index 18 Global Cybersecurity Index 19 Additional Indices of Importance in Cyber Security Analyses 21 Digitization Index 21 Digital Economy Ranking Index 21 Networked Readiness Index 22 3. Benefits 23 Competing Schools of Thought on Economic Benefits 23 Pessimism Versus optimism concerning ICT’s economic production impacts 23 ICT as a general-purpose technology 25 ICT’s Economic Impact: The Production Side 26 ICT as a growth sector in the economy 26 ICT investment and capital services 29 ICT and multifactor productivity 32 Comparing the Productivity Impacts of GPTs: Steam, Electricity, ICT 33 Variation in ICT Impact across Time/Pervasiveness and Countries 36 Drivers of variation in ICT impact: ICT (especially broadband) pervasiveness 36 Drivers of variable ICT impact: Beyond PCs and broadband 39 Drivers of variable ICT impact: Country development level 41 Consumer Surplus 42 Consumer surplus forecasts 46 Summary of Knowledge Concerning Cyber Risk Benefits: Modeling Implications 47 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Deutsche Nationalbibliografie
    Deutsche Nationalbibliografie Reihe T Musiktonträgerverzeichnis Monatliches Verzeichnis Jahrgang: 2015 T 05 Stand: 20. Mai 2015 Deutsche Nationalbibliothek (Leipzig, Frankfurt am Main) 2015 ISSN 1613-8945 urn:nbn:de:101-ReiheT05_2015-7 2 Hinweise Die Deutsche Nationalbibliografie erfasst eingesandte Pflichtexemplare in Deutschland veröffentlichter Medienwerke, aber auch im Ausland veröffentlichte deutschsprachige Medienwerke, Übersetzungen deutschsprachiger Medienwerke in andere Sprachen und fremdsprachige Medienwerke über Deutschland im Original. Grundlage für die Anzeige ist das Gesetz über die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek (DNBG) vom 22. Juni 2006 (BGBl. I, S. 1338). Monografien und Periodika (Zeitschriften, zeitschriftenartige Reihen und Loseblattausgaben) werden in ihren unterschiedlichen Erscheinungsformen (z.B. Papierausgabe, Mikroform, Diaserie, AV-Medium, elektronische Offline-Publikationen, Arbeitstransparentsammlung oder Tonträger) angezeigt. Alle verzeichneten Titel enthalten einen Link zur Anzeige im Portalkatalog der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek und alle vorhandenen URLs z.B. von Inhaltsverzeichnissen sind als Link hinterlegt. Die Titelanzeigen der Musiktonträger in Reihe T sind, wie sche Katalogisierung von Ausgaben musikalischer Wer- auf der Sachgruppenübersicht angegeben, entsprechend ke (RAK-Musik)“ unter Einbeziehung der „International der Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation (DDC) gegliedert, wo- Standard Bibliographic Description for Printed Music – bei tiefere Ebenen mit bis zu sechs Stellen berücksichtigt ISBD (PM)“ zugrunde.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Cyber Doom
    No. 11-01 January 2011 WORKING PAPER BEYOND CYBER-DOOM: Cyberattack Scenarios and the Evidence of History By Sean Lawson The ideas presented in this research are the author’s and do not represent official positions of the Mercatus Center at George Mason University. 1 Beyond Cyber-Doom: Cyberattack Scenarios and the Evidence of History Sean Lawson, Ph.D. Department of Communication University of Utah “[T]hese war games are about the real effects of a cyberwar . about causing chaos in our streets at home due to sudden crashes in our critical infrastructure through manipulation of our banking, transportation, utilities, communications, and other critical infrastructure industries. These are all real scenarios.” (Patterson, 2010b) “In seeking a prudent policy, the difficulty for decision-makers is to navigate the rocky shoals between hysterical doomsday scenarios and uninformed complacency.” (Cavelty, 2007: 144) Introduction Recently, news media and policy makers in the United States have turned their attention to prospective threats to and through an ethereal and ubiquitous technological domain referred to as “cyberspace.” “Cybersecurity” threats include attacks on critical infrastructures like power, water, transportation, and communication systems launched via cyberspace, but also terrorist use of the Internet, mobile phones, and other information and communication technologies (ICTs) for fundraising, recruiting, organizing, and carrying out attacks (Deibert & Rohozinski, 2010). Frustration over a perceived lack of public and policy maker attention to these threats, combined with a belief that “exaggeration” and “appeals to emotions like fear can be more compelling than a rational discussion of strategy” (Lewis, 2010: 4), a number of cybersecurity proponents have deployed what one scholar has called “cyber-doom scenarios” (Cavelty, 2007: 2).
    [Show full text]
  • Study (Abridged Version) the FUTURE of VALUES HELD by PEOPLE in OUR COUNTRY a Summary of Key Findings and Scenarios
    Study (abridged version) THE FUTURE OF VALUES HELD BY PEOPLE IN OUR COUNTRY A summary of key findings and scenarios Study (abridged version) THE FUTURE OF VALUES HELD BY PEOPLE IN OUR COUNTRY A summary of key findings and scenarios Principal investigators: Cordula Klaus Dr Christian Grünwald Michael Astor Authors: Anna Hornik Dr Georg Klose Dr Thomas Stehnken Florian Spalthoff Holger Glockner Dr Christian Grünwald Daniel Bonin Julian Sachs August 2020 This publication was developed as part of the Zukunfts- büro des Foresight-Prozesses (Foresight III) service contract awarded to Prognos AG and Z_punkt GmbH on behalf of the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), Strategic Foresight; Participation and Citizen Science unit. The authors are responsible for the content of this publication. The German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) accepts no liability for the factual correctness, accuracy or completeness of the information provided. The views and opinions expressed in this publication are not necessarily those of the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF). 3 Table of contents Summary of key findings ..............................................................................................................................................4 1 Introduction ..............................................................................................................................................................6 2 Summary of key findings: today’s life goals and the hopes and fears for the
    [Show full text]
  • Global Risks 2014 Ninth Edition Global Risks 2014, Ninth Edition Is Published by the World Economic Forum
    Insight Report Global Risks 2014 Ninth Edition Global Risks 2014, Ninth Edition is published by the World Economic Forum. The information in this report, or on which this report is based, has been obtained from sources that the authors believe to be reliable and accurate. However, it has not been independently verified and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to the accuracy or completeness of any information obtained from third parties. In addition, the statements in this report may provide current expectations of future events based on certain assumptions and may include statements that do not directly relate to a historical or current fact. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which are not exhaustive. The companies contributing to this report operate in a constantly changing environment and new risks emerge continually. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these statements. The companies contributing to this report undertake no obligation to publicly revise or update any statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, and they shall in no event be liable for any loss or damage arising from the use of the information in this report. World Economic Forum Geneva Copyright © 2014 By the World Economic Forum All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, or otherwise, without the prior permission of the World Economic Forum. ISBN-13: 92-95044-60-6 ISBN-10: 978-92-95044-60-9 REF: 090114 This report and an interactive data platform are available at www.weforum.org/risks.
    [Show full text]
  • Ten Key Questions on Cyber Risk and Cyber Risk Insurance the GENEVA ASSOCIATION
    Ten Key Questions on Cyber Risk and Cyber Risk Insurance THE GENEVA ASSOCIATION November 2016 The Geneva Association The Geneva Association is the leading international insurance think tank for strategically important insurance and risk management issues. The Geneva Association identifies fundamental trends and strategic issues where insurance plays a substantial role or which influence the insurance sector. Through the development of research programmes, regular publications and the organisation of international meetings, The Geneva Association serves as a catalyst for progress in the understanding of risk and insurance matters and acts as an information creator and disseminator. It is the leading voice of the largest insurance groups worldwide in the dialogue with international institutions. In parallel, it advances— in economic and cultural terms—the development and application of risk management and the understanding of uncertainty in the modern economy. The Geneva Association membership comprises a statutory maximum of 90 chief executive of officers (CEOs) from the world’s top insurance and reinsurance companies. It organises international expert networks and manages discussion platforms for senior insurance executives and specialists as well as policymakers, regulators and multilateral organisations. Established in 1973, The Geneva Association, officially the ‘International Association for the Study of Insurance Economics’, is based in Zurich, Switzerland and is a non-profit organisation funded by its Members. 2 www.genevaassociation.org
    [Show full text]
  • Cyber Threats to National Security
    DEALING WITH TODAY’S ASYMMETRIC THREAT Cyber Threats to National Security S YMPOSIUM F IVE Keeping the Nation’s Industrial Base Safe From Cyber Threats The Asymmetric Threat website (asymmetricthreat.net) includes downloadable reports from all symposia in both series and serves as a knowledge network to advance the dialogue on national and global security, presenting resources and original research, and providing a forum for review and discussion of pertinent themes and events. S ERIES O NE S ERIES T WO UNCLASSIFIED Cyber Threats to National Security Symposium Five: Keeping the Nation’s Industrial Base Safe From Cyber Threats This document is intended only as a summary of the personal remarks made by participants at the March 1, 2011 symposium, “Keeping the Nation’s Industrial Base Safe From Cyber Threats,” held at the Carnegie Institution for Science, Washington, D.C., and co-sponsored by CACI International Inc (CACI), the U.S. Naval Institute (USNI), and the Center for Security Policy (CSP). It is published as a public service. It does not necessarily reflect the views of CACI, USNI, CSP, the U.S. government, or their officers and employees. The pro bono Asymmetric Threat symposia series was started in 2008 to contribute to the national discourse on the topic of asymmetric threats facing the United States. CACI and the National Defense University sponsored Symposium One in the series, and CACI and USNI sponsored Symposia Two and Three. With Symposium Four, also sponsored by CACI and USNI, a new Asymmetric Threat series was initiated focusing on Cyber Threats. With new sponsor CSP,“Keeping the Nation’s Industrial Base Safe From Cyber Threats” is the fifth symposium in the Asymmetric Threat series and the second in the Cyber Threat series.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyber Security—2010 Hearings Committee On
    S. Hrg. 111–1103 CYBER SECURITY—2010 HEARINGS BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY AND GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION JUNE 15, 2010 PROTECTING CYBERSPACE AS A NATIONAL ASSET: COMPREHENSIVE LEGISLATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY NOVEMBER 17, 2010 SECURING CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE IN THE AGE OF STUXNET Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.fdsys.gov/ Printed for the use of the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 58–034 PDF WASHINGTON : 2011 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Nov 24 2008 14:00 Nov 14, 2011 Jkt 058034 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 P:\DOCS\58034.TXT SAFFAIRS PsN: PAT COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY AND GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS JOSEPH I. LIEBERMAN, Connecticut, Chairman CARL LEVIN, Michigan SUSAN M. COLLINS, Maine DANIEL K. AKAKA, Hawaii TOM COBURN, Oklahoma THOMAS R. CARPER, Delaware SCOTT P. BROWN, Massachusetts MARK L. PRYOR, Arkansas JOHN MCCAIN, Arizona MARY L. LANDRIEU, Louisiana GEORGE V. VOINOVICH, Ohio CLAIRE MCCASKILL, Missouri JOHN ENSIGN, Nevada JON TESTER, Montana LINDSEY GRAHAM, South Carolina ROLAND W. BURRIS, Illinois EDWARD E. KAUFMAN, Delaware * CHRISTOPHER A. COONS, Delaware * MICHAEL L. ALEXANDER, Staff Director DEBORAH P. PARKINSON, Senior Professional Staff Member ADAM R, SEDGEWICK, Professional Staff Member BRANDON L. MILHORN, Minority Staff Director and Chief Counsel ROBERT L. STRAYER, Minority Director of Homeland Security Affairs DEVIN F.
    [Show full text]
  • European Cyber Security Perspectives 2019 | 1 Preface
    European 2019Cyber Security Perspectives European Cyber Security Perspectives 2019 | 1 Preface Dear reader, 2018 is a difficult year to summarize for Infosec. After the initial flurry of activity around Spectre and Meltdown in the beginning of January, we ended the year with global supply chain concerns brought about by the Super Micro story. Throughout the year we saw the geopolitical dilemmas of 2018 manifest in cyber security issues. Technology giants like Facebook and Google had a security reckoning. However in pure scariness the medical data breaches of MyHeritage (DNA) and MyFitnessPal (health) rank higher. The Starwood Marriot Hotel breach made every travelling executive nervous for the rest of the year, but probably not as nervous as the incident of CEO Fraud at Pathé. In an effort to alleviate some of that impact we are proud to publish the 6th European Cyber Security Perspectives (ECSP) report. The 2019 issue is filled with great articles from our partners ranging from government, universities and private companies. Special thanks goes out to all the partners who have submitted an article for the 6th edition of the ECSP. Also huge hugs to first time authors from de Piratenpartij, de Volksbank, Leiden University, University of Illinois, Hack in the Box and QuSoft. If IoT was the buzzword in 2017 then Artificial Intelligence (AI) was most definitely in 2018. AI and security seem to be intertwined and that is why you will find several articles about AI in this issue. This year the organization of Hack in the Box created a challenge which you can find at the bottom of the centerfold.
    [Show full text]
  • Simulated Crisis Shows Potential Gaps in U.S. Cyber Defenses 18 February 2010, by Bob Drogin
    Simulated crisis shows potential gaps in U.S. cyber defenses 18 February 2010, By Bob Drogin The crisis began when college basketball fans Katrina struck in 2005. "The biggest danger," he downloaded a free March Madness application to declared, "is if we're ineffective." their smart phones. The app hid spyware that stole passwords, intercepted e-mails and created havoc. Panelists brought verisimilitude to their roles. Stewart Baker, former general counsel of the Soon 60 million cell phones were dead. The National Security Agency, said he would urge the Internet crashed and commerce collapsed. White White House to shut down cell phone networks House aides discussed declaring martial law. even if no law specifically allows it. That formed some of the doomsday scenario when "We will be criticized if we don't do everything we 10 former White House advisers and other top can," Baker said. "We can straighten out the (legal) officials met Tuesday in a rare public cyber war- authorities over time." game designed to highlight the potential vulnerability of the nation's digital infrastructure to Francis Fragos Townsend, who served as attack. counterterrorism adviser in the Bush White House, called for rationing of gasoline and other supplies if The results were hardly reassuring. necessary. "We're in uncharted territory here," was the most John Negroponte, who spent most of his career as common refrain during a three-hour simulated a diplomat before becoming the first director of crisis meeting of the National Security Council, the national intelligence, urged a diplomatic approach. crux of the Cyber Shockwave exercise.
    [Show full text]