Urban Transportation in Korea
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
8 Transportation Research Record 848 allocation of the spatial distribution of dwelling grated Transportation and Land Use Package. unit opportunities input to the household-allocation Transportation, Vol. 3, 1974, pp. 193-224. model. These dwelling-unit allocation functions 5. M, Ayeni. A Predictive Model of Urban Stock showed that the locations of apartments were more and Activity: 1, Theoretical Considerations. sensitive to employment accessibility than those of Environment and Planning A, Vol. 7, No. 8, the detached dwelling units. The household-alloca 1975, pp. 965-980. tion submodel also has a tendency to overallocate 6. M. Ayeni. A Predictive Model of Urban Stock household growth to the peripheral locations, which and Activity: 2, Empirical Development. Envi is also a zone size effect. ronment and Planning A, Vol. 8, No. 1, 1976, The spatial distribution of the growth in service pp. 59-78. employment is influenced by the size of the retail 7. R. Mackett. A Dynamic Integrated Activity Al shopping area and travel deterrence, the factors location-Transportation Model for West York incorporated in most allocation functions. shire. School of Geography, Univ. of Leeds, The model described in this paper may be used to Leeds, England, Rept. WP 40, 1976. support strategic planning studies at the regional B, R. Mackett. The Theoretical Structure of a Dy scale. It seems to be capable of capturing the namic Urban Activity and Stock Allocation major influences on development in growing areas. Model. School of Geography, Univ. of Leeds, The allocation functions have plausible structures, Leeds, England, Rept. WP 135, 1976, and the response of the model to changes in parame 9. M. Florian and s. Nguyen. An Application and ter magnitudes suggests that the initial calibration Validation of Equilibrium Trip Assignment Meth strategy and internal structure of the model were ods. Centre de Recherche sur les Transport, satisfactory. The major deficiency of the model, as Univ. de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, in all models of this type, is that it relies 1975. heavily on the exogenous input of many of the 10. G.M. Said. An Urban Systems Model for the supply-related variables. Toronto Region. Department of Civil Engineer ing, Univ. of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, REFERENCES Canada, Ph.D. thesis, 1979. 11. J.W. Simmons. Patterns of Residential Movement 1, M. Batty. Dynamic Simulation of an Urban Sys in Metropolitan Toronto. Univ. of Toronto tem. In Pattern and Process in Urban and Re Press, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 1974. gional Systems (A.G. Wilson, ed.), Pion, Lon 12. D. Seidman. The Construction of an Urban don, 1972. Growth Model. Delaware Valley Regional Plan 2. M. Batty. Urban Modelling. Cambridge Univ. ning Commission, Philadelphia, Tech. Supplement Press, Cambridge, England, 1976. PRl, Vol. A, 1969. 3. S.H. Putman. The Interdependence of Transpor 13. A.G. Wilson. Urban and Regional Models in tation Development and Land Development. In Geography and Planning, Wiley, New York, 1974. stitute of Environmental Studies, Department of City and Regional Planning, Univ. of Pennsyl vania, Philadelphia, 1973. Publication of this paper sponsored by Committee on Transportation and 4 . S.H. Putman. Preliminary Results from an Inte- Land Development. Urban Transportation 1n l(orea: Lesson for the World or a Passing Phase? TONY MICHELL Research into Korean urban transportation prospects conducted in 1979 and which strategy is adopted, the achievements in holding down the growth of 1980 is summarized. This paper identifies unusually low automobile owner private cars is a lesson that might be considered in other developing countries. ship during a period of rapid growth as the distinctive feature of Korean cities and traces the fiscal, financial, and utilitarian reasons for this phenomenon. It is argued that the low number of automobiles has benefited both existing Automobile ownership in South Korea has remained at automobile owners and users of public transportation. The public transporta an unusually low level during a period of rapid tion system is described ~nd evaluated. Future plans for Korean cities are economic growth that spans more than 20 years. This based on the assumption that rapid motorization will occur. It is argued that paper presents a summary of research conducted in the plans contain contradictory policies about decentralization and fail to 1979 and 1980 into the results of restricting such consider viable alternatives. These consist of increasing the efficiency of the an important variable in the urban transportation existing transportation system while retaining the full set of policies for con system and the prospects for the future (1-!l . It straining the growth of automobile ownership and use. It is suggested that is argued that the effect has been beneficial to the this strategy would maintain the efficiency and equitability of the existing city majority of urban Koreans, but that a combination of while minimizing investment. If this alternative strategy is adopted, then Korean cities will become the scene for important experiments in urban trans forces is now working to reverse past policies and portation, comparable to the Singapore area licensing scheme. In this case, accelerate the growth of automobile ownership. The Korea might become a lesson to the world. However, if existing constraints short- and medium-term consequences of this growth on automobile ownership are relaxed, then the present system will prove only will be to destroy the existing system. Alterna a passing phase and Korea will experience the problems of adjustment to the tives exist that would allow sufficient time to motorcar faced by European and Japanese cities in the past. Irrespective of experiment to preserve many of the beneficial fea- Transportation Research Record 848 9 Table 1. Major indicators of principal Korean cities. Item Seoul Pusan Daegu Inchon Kwangju Daejon Populiltion , 1979 (000 OOOs) 8.1 3.0 1.57 1.04 0.73 0.61 Area (km2 ) 627 436 178 200 213.4 87 .5 Urban area8 252.6 132.4 64.8 66 34 33.7 Urban density 32 066 22 652 24 228 15 740 21 479 18 085 Private cars 77 008 14 126 8239 3135 2214 2025 Official cars 2131 377 288 110 226 209 Taxis 26 960 20 051 3297 1866 1360 1053 Buses 6411 1915 1712 679 1279 596 Minibuses 600 Trucks 50 688 18 838 12 849 5048 4323 3593 Total vehiclesb 167 101 45 114 27 118 12 877 9734 7616 Cars per 1000 people 9.8 4.9 5.5 3.35 3.2 3.48 Bus companies 90 30 30 NA 4 14 Bus linesc 193 110 43 NA NA NA Per capita incomed (1975 $) 1099 900 883 NA 462 705 a £licludlng. mo~ntain, agricultural land, rivers, and lakes; in several cities these act as pa.rks and recreational areas. btnclud lng special vehicles, private buses, etc. C£xcludlna minibus lineJ, ,co1b uses, etc. dcalcul1ted by RORJ :and Kot~an Institute for Science and T echnology from Bank of Korea data for J 978 at t 975 prices, · Table 2. Sample comparisons of national levels of automobile ownership. fastest-growing economies, with an average annual gross national product (GNP) growth rate of 9.9 GDP per Capita percent between 1963 and 1978. Population growth (1975 or 1976 Cars per I 000 has also been rapid, al though slowing from around 3 Count ry Year U.S. dollars) Inhabitants percent/year at the beginning of the 1960s to about Pakistan 1976 200 2.7 1.6 percent during much of the 1970s. Urban growth Thailand 1975 379 6.2 has been even faster. Most cities have grown by Philippines 1976 407 8.82 about 5-6 percent/year, but several cities around Colombia 1975 574 16.4 Seoul have experienced an annual growth rate of well Ivory Coast 1976 610 12.8 over 10 percent. The basic ingredients of urban Ecuador 1976 640 13.7 Paraguay 1976 640 9.9 transportation demand--population and income--are Korea 1976 707 2.7 therefore extremely dynamic, and the potential 197 9 817" 6.8 rapidity of change compounds the problem of appro Tunisia 197 6 840 21.3 priate action. Turkey 1975 900 11.5 Brazil 1975 1158 46.1 Koreans do not think their cities function well, Japan 1976 4937 164.0 but few outside observers can fail to be impressed West Germany 1976 7249 307.6 by the way such high-density cities function. For United States 1976 7912 504.0 example, average car journey speeds in 1978 in Notes: GDP = gross domestic product. crosstown journeys at peak times were in the region The vagaries of national in com~ calculations in different countries mean of 29 km/h, nearly twice that of most large cities that GD P per capita figures cannot be precisely compared without spt!cific country information. in the Western world. When it is remembered that 3 1976 constant prices; all other figures current. the actual distances involved are short by European standards, and very short in American terms, it appears that the average Korean is spending much tures of the present system. If conducted, such less time per day in traveling than his or her Amer experiments could be of great interest to Western ican or European counterpart (6; 7, pp. 21-22). planners, and the future progress of the Korean Public transportation also has a high-average speed. urban system should prove deserving of closer atten That traffic and people move as well as they do tion. Regardless of the future, the Korean experi in this situation is chiefly the result of Korean ence offers a useful lesson to developing countries success at holding down the number of automobiles. with lower per capita incomes. As can be seen from Table 2 (§.,.2.), Korea had until very recently a level of car ownership approximately THE KOREAN CITY four times lower than countries with comparable per capita incomes, and only 5 percent of households own South Korea is the fourth most densely populated motorcars at the present time.