INDEPENDENT ENDLINE EVALUATION of the COMMONSENSING PROJECT Provisional Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

INDEPENDENT ENDLINE EVALUATION of the COMMONSENSING PROJECT Provisional Report INDEPENDENT ENDLINE EVALUATION OF THE COMMONSENSING PROJECT Provisional Report June 2021 Planning, Performance Monitoring and Evaluation Unit This page is intentionally left blank. i This report is a product of the Planning, Performance Monitoring and Evaluation Unit of UNITAR. The findings, conclusions and recommendations expressed therein do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the partners and countries of the CommonSensing project or its donor. The evaluation was conducted by Ms. Gemma Piñol Puig, Independent Evaluator with support from in country evaluators Linda Bui Kin Yuen (Fiji), Jennifer Louise Bowtell (Vanuatu) and Sammy Dan Warihiru Airahui (Solomon Islands). The report is issued without formal copy editing. The designation employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNITAR concerning the legal status of any country, city or area or its authorities or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. ii Table of Contents ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................................................. IV FOREWORD ............................................................................................................................................. V INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND................................................................................................ 1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE ......................................................................................................................... 3 METHODOLOGY ...................................................................................................................................... 4 LIMITATIONS OF THE METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................ 6 PART A. PROCESS EVALUATION ....................................................................................................... 7 EFFECTIVENESS ................................................................................................................................................. 7 EFFICIENCY ...................................................................................................................................................... 13 PART B: IMPACT EVALUATION ......................................................................................................... 17 ASSESSMENT OF GENDER EQUALITY AND THE EMPOWERMENT OF WOMEN ............................................... 17 EFFECTIVENESS ............................................................................................................................................... 19 IMPACT ............................................................................................................................................................. 23 SUSTAINABILITY .............................................................................................................................................. 27 CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................................................ 28 RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................................................................................................... 29 LESSONS LEARNED ............................................................................................................................ 31 APPENDICES ......................................................................................................................................... 32 1. TERMS OF REFERENCE .......................................................................................................................... 33 2. SURVEY/QUESTIONNAIRES DEPLOYED .................................................................................................. 44 3. LIST OF PERSONS INTERVIEWED ............................................................................................................ 57 4. LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED ............................................................................................................ 65 5. EVALUATION QUESTION MATRIX ............................................................................................................. 66 6. EVALUATION CONSULTANT AGREEMENT FORM AND ETHICAL PLEDGE ................................................ 104 7. OUTPUT TABLE ..................................................................................................................................... 106 8. OUTCOME HARVESTING RESULTS ....................................................................................................... 112 9. LOGFRAME ........................................................................................................................................... 116 iii Acronyms CCA Climate Change Adaptation CCR Climate Change Resilience CEA Cost-Effectiveness Analysis COVID-19 Coronavirus Disease 2019 CS CommonSensing DRR Disaster Risk Reduction EO Earth Observation IPP International Partnership Programme GIS Geospatial Information System GIT Geospatial Information Technology M&E Monitoring and Evaluation PPME Planning, Performance Monitoring and Evaluation Unit SDG Sustainable Development Goal SPC South Pacific Community TA Technical Assistance UAV Unmanned Aerial Vehicle UKSA United Kingdom Space Agency UN United Nations UNITAR United Nations Institute for Training and Research UNOSAT UNITAR Operational Satellite Applications Programme Unit WP Work Package iv Foreword The CommonSensing project aims to strengthen the capacities of Fiji, Solomon Islands and Vanuatu in reaching important sustainable development objectives and particularly Goals 9 (Industry, innovation and infrastructure) and 13 (Climate action) under the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Commencing in 2018, the project is implemented by a consortium of partners specialising in satellite applications, geospatial and remote sensing, and is funded by the United Kingdom Space Agency through its International Partnership Programme. The project is one of UNITAR’s largest projects with focus on Small Island Developing States. While the project was scheduled to end in March 2021, a no-cost extension was granted in March (at the time the present evaluation was being finalized), extending the project through May 2021. As it is likely be further granted for another year, the present report is issued provisionally. Should the further extension be granted and funding made available, a new endline evaluation will be undertaken (or the present report revised) during the fourth quarter of 2021. The Cost Effectiveness Analysis report is planned to be updated in the fourth quarter of 2021 and is hence not issued in conjunction with this provisional endline evaluation report. Without prejudice to the provisional status of the present report, the evaluation found the project to be efficient and effective and found some signals of likelihood of impact and commitment of the consortium members to sustainability. The evaluation identified areas for improvement with a set of four recommendations to strengthen the project’s sustainability and impact, with the assumption that the additional no-cost extension through March 2022 will be granted. The evaluation was managed by the UNITAR Planning, Performance Monitoring, and Evaluation (PPME) Unit and was undertaken by Ms. Gemma Piñol Puig, consultant and independent evaluator with support from three local experts, with one based in each of the three target countries. The PPME Unit further provided guidance, oversight and quality assurance. The Consortium leads’ response to the evaluation and its conclusions and recommendations are outlined in the Management Response. The PPME Unit is grateful to the evaluator, the UNITAR-UNOSAT, Catapult and the other consortium members, the donor (UK Space Agency), Caribou Digital, the partner countries and the other stakeholders for providing important input into this evaluation. Brook Boyer Director, Division for Strategic Planning and Performance Manager, Planning, Performance Monitoring, and Evaluation Unit v Executive Summary This report presents the findings, recommendations and lessons from the endline evaluation of the CommonSensing (CS) project. Funded by the United Kingdom Space Agency (UKSA) under the International Partnership Programme with financing from the Global Challenges Research Fund, the project aims to strengthen disaster risk reduction (DRR) and climate change resilience by the end of 2020 in Fiji, Solomon Islands and Vanuatu by 1) increasing national resource capacities to use of Earth Observation (EO) solutions to address DRR and CCR and 2) enhancing evidence-based decision making by using CS solutions for DRR and CCA. The project was delivered initially from February 2018 until March 2021, with a total forecasted budget of £24,269,759. In early April 2021 and prior to the issuance of this evaluation report, UKSA granted the project a no-cost extension until 31 May 2021, and a further extension is expected to be granted through March 2022. Consequently, the report is being issued provisionally and may be updated or replaced by a new endline evaluation at the end of 2021 to account for the no cost extension period. The report should be read with this caveat in mind. The project was designed and implemented by a consortium of partners led by the United Nations Institute for
Recommended publications
  • 2019-2020 Annual Report
    Bringing Hope in Emergency Building partnerships for the future Annual Report 2019-2020 The Catholica BRINGING Agency HOPE for IN EMERGENCYInternational Aid and Development “The Spirit of the Lord is Contents upon me, because he has anointed me to bring good Our Vision news to the poor. He has Vision and Mission 1 sent me to proclaim release to the captives and recovery From the Chair 2 of sight to the blind, to let From the CEO 3 the oppressed go free, to Principles 4 proclaim the year of the Strategy 5 Lord’s favour.” Our Work Luke 4:17-19 Where we work 6-7 Myanmar 8 Australia 9 Lebanon 10 South Sudan 11 Solomon Islands 12 Vietnam 13 Evaluation and learning 14 COVID-19 response 15 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander readers should be aware that this publication may contain images or names of people who have since passed away. Caritas Our Year Australia acknowledges the traditional owners and custodians, past and present, of the land on which all our offices are located. Year in review 16-17 Our year in advocacy 18 Cover: Villagers in Afghanistan learn how to protect themselves from COVID-19 In their own words 19 through hand-washing and hygiene measures. Photo: Stefanie Glinski/Catholic Relief Services Financial snapshot 20-21 Inside cover: A child in the Turkana region of Kenya, an arid region and the poorest in Kenya, with 60% of the population living in extreme poverty. Photo: Garry Walsh, Trocaire Fundraising spotlight 22 Design: Three Blocks Left ABN 90 970 605 069 Published November 2020 by Caritas Australia © Copyright Caritas Australia 2020 Leadership ISSN 2201-3083 In keeping with Caritas Australia’s high standard of transparency, this version has Our Diocesan network 23 been updated to correct minor typographical errors from an earlier version.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix to Human Rights During the Pandemic
    ............................................................................................................................. ............................................... Contents APPENDIX: GRAPHS FOR EACH COUNTRY ....................................................................................... 4 American Samoa ............................................................................................................ 5 Angola ........................................................................................................................... 6 Australia ...................................................................................................................... 11 Brazil ........................................................................................................................... 16 Cook Islands ................................................................................................................ 21 Democratic Republic of Congo ...................................................................................... 26 Fiji ............................................................................................................................... 31 French Polynesia .......................................................................................................... 36 Federated States of Micronesia ..................................................................................... 41 Guam ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Accept Corona As Part of Life, Return to Normalcy
    Indian Horizon National English Daily [email protected] www.indianhorizon.org RNI NO: DELENG/2013/51507 In memory of Dr Asima Kemal and Prof. Dr. Salim W Kemal [email protected] Volume Issue No: 139 Published from New Delhi & Hyderabad New Delhi, Thursday, May 21, 2020 No: 7 Pages 12 + 4 pull out (P16) Price: 3.00 INS TO SC: CENTRE, STATES TOOK HCQ AFTER VALET MAIN AIM IS TO WIN AN OLY OWE SEVERAL CRORES’ DUES TESTED COVID POSITIVE, MEDAL OF DIFFERENT COLOUR TO MEDIA INDUSTRY SAYS TRUMP IN TOKYO: MARY P-3 P-8 P-11 HOLIDAY NOTICE New Delhi, May 20 (IANS) mentation of the scheme that Prime Minister Narendra Modi NARENDRA MODI : is expected to bring about Blue THE WORLD UNDER ATTACK on Wednesday said several de- Revolution through sustainable cisions taken by the Cabinet Migrants, fishermen, and responsible development SCOURGE OF CORONAVIRUS today focused on welfare of of fisheries sector in India un- migrants, poor and senior citi- senior citizen to gain from der two components -- Central zens, adding these would facili- Sector Scheme and Centrally TOTAL TALLY IN INDIA Our office will be tate easier availability of credit Cabinet decisions Sponsored Scheme -- at a to- mounts to 1,06,750, death closed on 21st of May, and create opportunities in the tal estimated investment of Rs 2020 on the occasion fisheries sector. equate livelihood for rural-ur- 20,050 crore. toll 3,303 of Shab-E-Qadr. While welcoming the Cabi- ban communities.On ‘Pradhan The scheme is likely to ad- Therefore, net’s decision on formalisation Mantri Matsya Sampada Yo- dress the critical gaps in the of microfood processing enter- jana’, Modi said it will “revolu- fisheries sector and realize its there will be no issue prises, PM Modi tweeted: “The tionise the fisheries sector”.
    [Show full text]
  • Being Prepared for Unprecedented Times Peter Layton
    Being prepared for unprecedented times National mobilisation conceptualisations and their implications Peter Layton 1 2 3 BEING PREPARED FOR UNPRECEDENTED TIMES National mobilisation conceptualisations and their implications Peter Layton 3 About the Griffith Asia Institute The Griffith Asia Institute (GAI) is an internationally recognised research centre in the Griffith Business School. We reflect Griffith University’s longstanding commitment and future aspirations for the study of and engagement with nations of Asia and the Pacific. At GAI, our vision is to be the informed voice leading Australia’s strategic engagement in the Asia Pacific— cultivating the knowledge, capabilities and connections that will inform and enrich Australia’s Asia-Pacific future. We do this by: i) conducting and supporting excellent and relevant research on the politics, security, economies and development of the Asia-Pacific region; ii) facilitating high level dialogues and partnerships for policy impact in the region; iii) leading and informing public debate on Australia’s place in the Asia Pacific; and iv) shaping the next generation of Asia-Pacific leaders through positive learning experiences in the region. Visit us at: www.griffith.edu.au/asiainstitute About the publication This paper has been developed with the support of the Directorate of Mobilisation, Force Design Division within the Australian Department of Defence. Mobilisation involves civil society, emergency services and all levels of government. The sharing of the research undertaken aims to encourage informed community debate. Disclaimer: The views expressed in this publication are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Australian Government or the Department of Defence, or any part thereof.
    [Show full text]
  • Multiple Disaster and Debt Sustainability in Small Island
    December 2020 UNCTAD Research Paper No. 55 UNCTAD/SER.RP/2020/14 Anja Slany Multiple disasters and Associate Expert Division for Africa, Least Developed debt sustainability in Countries, and Special Programmes (ALDC), UNCTAD Small Island Developing [email protected] States Abstract Small Island Developing States (SIDS) are the most disaster-prone countries in the world. With an increasing frequency over time, they are regularly hit by severe storms and other disasters, causing on average an annual damage of 2.1 percent of GDP. In the aftermath of disasters, reconstruction efforts require massive financial resources which are often covered through external borrowing. On top, small countries are highly dependent and exposed to economic shocks what results in a massive drop of GDP and exports during global crisis such as COVID-19. In order to provide policy makers with tools to maintain debt sustainability, a better understanding of the options and the complexity between disaster response and debt is required. This paper estimates the impact of multiple disasters on debt sustainability indicators in SIDS over the period 1980 to 2018. Applying a fixed- effects and a Synthetic Control estimator, the results indicate an only weak correlation between a severe natural disaster and external debt what can be related to the restrictions of already highly indebted SIDS to access adequate financing. The paper discusses the implications for financing stronger resilience to disasters in the future and calls for stronger multilateral cooperation and greater flexibility in the accessibility to pre- and post- disaster financial instruments. Key words: Natural disasters, debt, SIDS, panel data © 2020 United Nations 1 UNCTAD Research Paper No.
    [Show full text]
  • Israeli Scholarships for Fijians, Praise for Govt, RFMF
    FRIDAY FEBRUARY 21, 2020 l 16 PAGES l ISSUE 3 VOL 11 l WWW.FIJI.GOV.FJ Fijijj Focus Israeli scholarships for Fijians, praise for Govt, RFMF Prime Minister Voreqe Bainimarama with President of the State of Israel, Reuven Rivlin at Pullman Resort and Spa in Wailoaloa, Nadi yesterday. Photo: NANISE NEIMILA DEEPER TIES MEREANI GONEDUA nouncement, highlighted that the new Pacific. This collaboration will enable us to culture that has enabled their relationship to scholarships would begin in August this work together to apply Israeli innovation deepen over the years. TOTAL of 100 new scholarships year for students interested in agriculture. to pressing challenges such as food secu- While acknowledging Fiji’s contribution for Fiji and the Pacific island coun- “I am also proud to announce that Israel rity, climate change, ocean rise and public towards peacekeeping, President Rivlin also A tries has been announced by Israel will open a centre of excellence and in- health. President, Reuven Rivlin. novation for Pacific Island States in col- President Rivlin said Fiji and Israel have President Rivlin, while making the an- laboration with the University of the South cooperated in many fields apart from agri- CONTINUES ON PAGE 3 email: [email protected]; @FijianGovt; Fijian Government; visit us @ www.fiji.gov.fj NATIONAL MATTERS phone: 3301806 Work on common goals, minister urges PICs INSIDE AZARIA FAREEN ACIFIC Island Countries (PICs) should work togeth- $17M GRANT FOR Per towards their common DISASTER RESILIENCE - 15 goal despite challenges linked to changing climate, frayed interna- GOVT PRAISED FOR BRINGING tional markets and threats to the POWER TO COMMUNITY - 14 multilateral trading system.
    [Show full text]
  • MSA Newsletter 7 | 19 May 2020 1
    A newsletter for Member Schools of Marist Schools Australia published fortnightly during term time From Frank Malloy Dear Colleagues, Kindness, it’s contagious! Early in the first month of the current pandemic appearing in this country, Prime Minister Morrison urged Australians to be kind to one another. The statement seemed remarkable from a Prime Minister, and entirely appropriate. As we navigate the impacts of COVID-19, take pride in our collective efficacy in minimising infections through adherence to the various prescribed measures, and make the necessary careful adjustments to new ways of working and living whilst the virus remains active, the need to be kind to one another is growing rather than diminishing. In difficult times great leaders come to the fore, at all levels of society. This has certainly been the case in our Marist schools, among staff, parents and students. The demands upon parents and students these past months have been extraordinary and rightly teachers and Principals across the country are being hailed as unassuming, national heroes. The speed and agility with which our school communities have responded to the crisis and the many changes it has necessitated is remarkable. Most impressive has been the strategic, purposeful evaluation by teachers of the various off-site learning arrangements and the manner in which new insights are influencing learning and teaching as students return to school. Reports of greater engagement particularly by boys in the coeducational settings have been common, whilst students of a quieter disposition have also featured prominently in positive feedback. Most overwhelming from our schools across the country, is the demonstrable sheer delight of our young people to be together again, learning at school.
    [Show full text]
  • SOLAR UNDER STORM for POLICYMAKERS Select Best Practices for Resilient Photovoltaic Systems for Small Island Developing States
    M OUN KY T C A I O N R I N E STIT U T SOLAR UNDER STORM FOR POLICYMAKERS Select Best Practices for Resilient Photovoltaic Systems for Small Island Developing States BY CHRISTOPHER BURGESS, JUSTIN LOCKE, LAURIE STONE AUTHORS & ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AUTHORS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Christopher Burgess, Justin Locke, Laurie Stone The authors thank the following individuals/ organizations for offering their insights and * Authors listed in alphabetical order perspectives on this work: Joseph Goodman, Rocky Mountain Institute ADDITIONAL CONTRIBUTORS (previously) Sanya Detweiler, Clinton Climate Initiative, Clinton Chris Needham, FCX Solar Foundation Frank Oudheusden, FCX Solar Shifaana Thowfeequ, UN-OHRLLS CONTACTS Christopher Burgess, [email protected] Sanya Detweiler, [email protected] Shifaana Thowfeequ, [email protected] SUGGESTED CITATION Laurie Stone, Christopher Burgess, and Justin Locke, Solar Under Storm for Policymakers: Select Best Practices for Resilient PV Systems for Small Island Developing States, 2020, www.rmi.org/insight/solar- under-storm-for-policymakers. All images from iStock unless otherwise noted. ABOUT US M OUN KY T C A I O N R I N E STIT U T ABOUT ROCKY MOUNTAIN INSTITUTE Rocky Mountain Institute (RMI)—an independent nonprofit founded in 1982—transforms global energy use to create a clean, prosperous, and secure low-carbon future. It engages businesses, communities, institutions, and entrepreneurs to accelerate the adoption of market-based solutions that cost-effectively shift from fossil fuels to efficiency and renewables. RMI has offices in Basalt and Boulder, Colorado; New York City; the San Francisco Bay Area; Washington, D.C.; and Beijing. ABOUT THE CLINTON FOUNDATION Building on a lifetime of public service, President Clinton established the Clinton Foundation on the simple belief that everyone deserves a chance to succeed, everyone has a responsibility to act, and we all do better when we work together.
    [Show full text]
  • Tropical Cyclone Harold & Covid 19
    WASH Cluster Lessons Learn 2020 TROPICAL CYCLONE HAROLD & COVID 19 LESSONS LEARNT July 2020. 1 WASH Cluster Lessons Learn 2020 Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 3 Objectives................................................................................................................................... 3 Methodology .............................................................................................................................. 3 Results ........................................................................................................................................ 4 Annex 1. List of participants .................................................................................................... 15 Annex 2: Questions for WASH SOP development ................................................................... 16 2 WASH Cluster Lessons Learn 2020 Introduction Vanuatu declared a COVID 19 pandemic and declared a state of emergency for its response in March 2020. WASH responded with hygiene and sanitation promotion measures across all provinces. When COVID 19 promotional measures were progressing well, a category 5 Tropical Cyclone Harold swept through the north central part of Vanuatu causing widespread damage to infrastructures and livelihood on 6-7 April 2020. The most affected islands were Santo (West, South, South East Santo, Malo, Aore, and the offshore islands, Central Pentecost 1, Central
    [Show full text]
  • NTS Insight- Humanitarian Assistance in the Asia-Pacific During COVID-19
    NTS Insight, no. IN20-06, August 2020 This insight is part of the centre’s COVID-19 series, looking at current developments in the global pandemic and its future implications for the social, political and economic spheres in the region. Humanitarian Assistance in the Asia-Pacific during COVID-19 By Christopher Chen and Alistair D. B. Cook As the world grapples with the COVID-19 pandemic, the threat of natural hazards still looms large. How will humanitarian response to a major natural hazard Be affected during the COVID-19 pandemic? As the monsoon season Begins in the Asia-Pacific, particularly in the South West Pacific and Southeast Asia, this is a scenario that countries face. The overlapping effects of a pandemic and a natural hazard can compound socio-economic vulneraBilities in countries. While the current focus is on managing the COVID-19 pandemic, governments and communities also need to Be prepared for concurrent natural hazards. This NTS Insight explores the effects of concurrent pandemic-disaster events, and how they threaten states and societies in the Asia-Pacific. This Insight demonstrates the potential challenges of dual crises on societies and vulneraBle populations. It argues that the current situation calls for a Broader and deeper localisation of the humanitarian system, one that places human security as its core organising principle unlike the Backseat it currently takes today. To this end, it argues that inter-regional cooperation can further localisation through the experience of the South West Pacific where human security is articulated as national security and the cooperation in Southeast Asia on disaster response which Builds national capacity.
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Adequacy (E) Task Force RBC Proposal Form
    Capital Adequacy (E) Task Force RBC Proposal Form [ ] Capital Adequacy (E) Task Force [ x ] Health RBC (E) Working Group [ ] Life RBC (E) Working Group [ ] Catastrophe Risk (E) Subgroup [ ] Investment RBC (E) Working Group [ ] SMI RBC (E) Subgroup [ ] C3 Phase II/ AG43 (E/A) Subgroup [ ] P/C RBC (E) Working Group [ ] Stress Testing (E) Subgroup DATE: 08/31/2020 FOR NAIC USE ONLY CONTACT PERSON: Crystal Brown Agenda Item # 2020-07-H TELEPHONE: 816-783-8146 Year 2021 EMAIL ADDRESS: [email protected] DISPOSITION [ x ] ADOPTED WG 10/29/20 & TF 11/19/20 ON BEHALF OF: Health RBC (E) Working Group [ ] REJECTED NAME: Steve Drutz [ ] DEFERRED TO TITLE: Chief Financial Analyst/Chair [ ] REFERRED TO OTHER NAIC GROUP AFFILIATION: WA Office of Insurance Commissioner [ ] EXPOSED ________________ ADDRESS: 5000 Capitol Blvd SE [ ] OTHER (SPECIFY) Tumwater, WA 98501 IDENTIFICATION OF SOURCE AND FORM(S)/INSTRUCTIONS TO BE CHANGED [ x ] Health RBC Blanks [ x ] Health RBC Instructions [ ] Other ___________________ [ ] Life and Fraternal RBC Blanks [ ] Life and Fraternal RBC Instructions [ ] Property/Casualty RBC Blanks [ ] Property/Casualty RBC Instructions DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE(S) Split the Bonds and Misc. Fixed Income Assets into separate pages (Page XR007 and XR008). REASON OR JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANGE ** Currently the Bonds and Misc. Fixed Income Assets are included on page XR007 of the Health RBC formula. With the implementation of the 20 bond designations and the electronic only tables, the Bonds and Misc. Fixed Income Assets were split between two tabs in the excel file for use of the electronic only tables and ease of printing. However, for increased transparency and system requirements, it is suggested that these pages be split into separate page numbers beginning with year-2021.
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-19 FHA Decision Support Tool UPDATED 20 MAY 2020
    UNCLASSIFIED CENTER FOR EXCELLENCE IN DISASTER MANAGEMENT & HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE WWW.CFE-DMHA.ORG COVID-19 FHA Decision Support Tool UPDATED 20 MAY 2020 UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED List of Countries and U.S. Territories in USINDOPACOM AOR Notes: For quick access to each section place cursor over section and press Ctrl + Click Updated text in last 24 hours highlighted in yellow Table of Contents AMERICAN SAMOA .................................................................................................................................................... 3 AUSTRALIA ................................................................................................................................................................. 5 BANGLADESH ............................................................................................................................................................. 7 BHUTAN ................................................................................................................................................................... 12 BRUNEI ..................................................................................................................................................................... 15 CAMBODIA ............................................................................................................................................................... 17 CHINA .....................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]