Appendix to Human Rights During the Pandemic

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Appendix to Human Rights During the Pandemic ............................................................................................................................. ............................................... Contents APPENDIX: GRAPHS FOR EACH COUNTRY ....................................................................................... 4 American Samoa ............................................................................................................ 5 Angola ........................................................................................................................... 6 Australia ...................................................................................................................... 11 Brazil ........................................................................................................................... 16 Cook Islands ................................................................................................................ 21 Democratic Republic of Congo ...................................................................................... 26 Fiji ............................................................................................................................... 31 French Polynesia .......................................................................................................... 36 Federated States of Micronesia ..................................................................................... 41 Guam ........................................................................................................................... 46 Hong Kong ................................................................................................................... 51 Jordan ......................................................................................................................... 56 Kazakhstan .................................................................................................................. 61 Kiribati ......................................................................................................................... 66 Kyrgyzstan ................................................................................................................... 70 Liberia.......................................................................................................................... 75 Malaysia ...................................................................................................................... 78 Marshall Islands ........................................................................................................... 83 Mexico ......................................................................................................................... 87 Mozambique ................................................................................................................ 92 Nauru ........................................................................................................................... 97 Nepal ........................................................................................................................... 98 New Caledonia ........................................................................................................... 103 New Zealand .............................................................................................................. 108 Niue ........................................................................................................................... 113 Northern Mariana Islands ............................................................................................ 118 Papua New Guinea ..................................................................................................... 123 Samoa ....................................................................................................................... 128 Saudi Arabia ............................................................................................................... 133 Solomon Islands ......................................................................................................... 138 South Korea ............................................................................................................... 140 Taiwan ....................................................................................................................... 145 Tonga ........................................................................................................................ 150 Tuvalu ........................................................................................................................ 155 United Kingdom .......................................................................................................... 156 United States .............................................................................................................. 161 Vanuatu ..................................................................................................................... 166 Venezuela .................................................................................................................. 168 Vietnam ..................................................................................................................... 173 ............................................................................................................................................................................ ............................................................................................................................................................................ Appendix: Graphs for each Country In the main body of our report Human Rights During the Pandemic, we present graphs showing our findings across all human rights experts from 39 countries. In this Appendix, we present graphs showing the full responses from human rights experts, country by country. For each country, shown in alphabetical order, some or all of the following are available: • A graph showing how badly each rights category was affected, based on the responses of human rights in our annual survey. • A graph for each of those rights categories: Safety from the State, Empowerment, and Quality of Life, showing which rights within the category were affected by Covid-19. • For convenience, screenshots from the Rights Tracker, showing the change over time for Safety from the State and Empowerment rights. In some countries with small populations, the first two sets of graphs were not able to be produced, because we could not get enough responses from human rights experts. In these cases we only show what is available. Please note that the Rights Tracker has further information, including lists of which people groups were at extra risk of rights violations, and more context from our experts. Human Rights Measurement Initiative 24 June 2021 ............................................................................................................................................................................ American Samoa Which human rights were most affected by the Covid-19 pandemic? How have these rights changed over time? ............................................................................................................................................................................ Angola During 2020 in Angola, what effect did the Covid-19 pandemic have on the following categories of human rights practices? ............................................................................................................................................................................ Which human rights were most affected by the Covid-19 pandemic? Safety from the State ............................................................................................................................................................................ Empowerment ............................................................................................................................................................................ Quality of Life ............................................................................................................................................................................ How have these rights changed over time? ............................................................................................................................................................................ Australia During 2020 in Australia, what effect did the Covid-19 pandemic have on the following categories of human rights practices? ............................................................................................................................................................................ Which human rights were most affected by the Covid-19 pandemic? Safety from the State ............................................................................................................................................................................ Empowerment ............................................................................................................................................................................ Quality of Life ............................................................................................................................................................................ How have these rights changed over time? ...........................................................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Central Asia the Caucasus
    CENTRAL ASIA AND THE CAUCASUS English Edition VolumeISSN 1404-609121 Issue 4 ( Print2020) ISSN 2002-3839 (Online) CENTRAL ASIA AND THE CAUCASUS English Edition Journal of Social and Political Studies Volume 21 Issue 4 2020 CA&C Press AB SWEDEN 1 Volume 21 Issue 4 2020 CENTRAL ASIA AND THE CAUCASUS English Edition FOUNDED AND PUBLISHED BY INSTITUTE FOR CENTRAL ASIAN AND CAUCASIAN STUDIES Registration number: 620720-0459 State Administration for Patents and Registration of Sweden CA&C PRESS AB Publishing House Registration number: 556699-5964 Companies registration Office of Sweden Journal registration number: 23 614 State Administration for Patents and Registration of Sweden E d i t o r s Murad ESENOV Editor-in-Chief Tel./fax: (46) 70 232 16 55; E-mail: [email protected] Kalamkas represents the journal in Kazakhstan (Nur-Sultan) YESSIMOVA Tel./fax: (7 - 701) 7408600; E-mail: [email protected] Ainura represents the journal in Kyrgyzstan (Bishkek) ELEBAEVA Tel./fax: (996 - 312) 61 30 36; E-mail: [email protected] Saodat OLIMOVA represents the journal in Tajikistan (Dushanbe) Tel.: (992 372) 21 89 95; E-mail: [email protected] Farkhad represents the journal in Uzbekistan (Tashkent) TOLIPOV Tel.: (9987 - 1) 225 43 22; E-mail: [email protected] Kenan represents the journal in Azerbaijan (Baku) ALLAHVERDIEV Tel.: (+994 - 50) 325 10 50; E-mail: [email protected] David represents the journal in Armenia (Erevan) PETROSYAN Tel.: (374 - 10) 56 88 10; E-mail: [email protected] Vakhtang represents the journal in Georgia (Tbilisi)
    [Show full text]
  • Israeli Scholarships for Fijians, Praise for Govt, RFMF
    FRIDAY FEBRUARY 21, 2020 l 16 PAGES l ISSUE 3 VOL 11 l WWW.FIJI.GOV.FJ Fijijj Focus Israeli scholarships for Fijians, praise for Govt, RFMF Prime Minister Voreqe Bainimarama with President of the State of Israel, Reuven Rivlin at Pullman Resort and Spa in Wailoaloa, Nadi yesterday. Photo: NANISE NEIMILA DEEPER TIES MEREANI GONEDUA nouncement, highlighted that the new Pacific. This collaboration will enable us to culture that has enabled their relationship to scholarships would begin in August this work together to apply Israeli innovation deepen over the years. TOTAL of 100 new scholarships year for students interested in agriculture. to pressing challenges such as food secu- While acknowledging Fiji’s contribution for Fiji and the Pacific island coun- “I am also proud to announce that Israel rity, climate change, ocean rise and public towards peacekeeping, President Rivlin also A tries has been announced by Israel will open a centre of excellence and in- health. President, Reuven Rivlin. novation for Pacific Island States in col- President Rivlin said Fiji and Israel have President Rivlin, while making the an- laboration with the University of the South cooperated in many fields apart from agri- CONTINUES ON PAGE 3 email: [email protected]; @FijianGovt; Fijian Government; visit us @ www.fiji.gov.fj NATIONAL MATTERS phone: 3301806 Work on common goals, minister urges PICs INSIDE AZARIA FAREEN ACIFIC Island Countries (PICs) should work togeth- $17M GRANT FOR Per towards their common DISASTER RESILIENCE - 15 goal despite challenges linked to changing climate, frayed interna- GOVT PRAISED FOR BRINGING tional markets and threats to the POWER TO COMMUNITY - 14 multilateral trading system.
    [Show full text]
  • Taking Stock of Regional Democratic Trends in Asia and the Pacific
    Taking Stock of Regional Democratic Trends in Asia and the Pacific Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic The Global State of Democracy Special Brief, December 2020 IN FOCUS The Global State of Democracy Special Brief, December 2020 Taking Stock of Regional Democratic Trends in Asia and the Pacific Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic Key facts and findings • Prior to the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, organizations and courts, conduct their work. In countries across Asia and the Pacific faced a range a number of countries, for example, government of democratic challenges. Chief among these ministries, electoral commissions, legislators, were continuing political fragility, violent conflict, health officials and civil society have developed recurrent military interference in the political sphere, innovative new online tools for keeping the public enduring hybridity, deepening autocratization, informed about national efforts to combat the creeping ethnonationalism, advancing populist pandemic. And some legislatures are figuring out leadership, democratic backsliding, shrinking new ways to hold government to account in the civic space, the spread of disinformation, and absence of real-time parliamentary meetings. weakened checks and balances. The crisis conditions engendered by the pandemic risk further • The consideration of political regime type in entrenching and/or intensifying the negative debates around ways of containing the pandemic democratic trends observable in the region prior to also assumes particular relevance in Asia and the COVID-19 outbreak. the Pacific, a region that houses high-performing democracies, such as New Zealand and the Republic • Across the region, governments have been using of Korea (South Korea), a mid-range performer the conditions created by the pandemic to expand (Taiwan), and also non-democratic regimes, such as executive power and restrict individual rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Covid-19 Pandemic and the Subsequent Effect on Public Tranport in Asia
    Discussion paper issued without formal editing FOR PARTICIPANTS ONLY 10 November 2020 ENGLISH ONLY UNITED NATIONS CENTRE FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT In collaboration with Ministry of the Environment, Government of Japan United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia & the Pacific INTERGOVERNMENTAL 13th REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTALLY SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT (EST) FORUM IN ASIA 10-11 NOVEMBER 2020 Virtual meeting via video conference in Webex platform COVID-19 PANDEMIC AND THE SUBSEQUENT EFFECT ON PUBLIC TRANPORT IN ASIA (Background Paper for Joint ESCAP-UNCRD Policy Dialogue 1) Final Draft ------------------------------------- This background paper has been prepared by Dipanju Buragohain, Madan B. Regmi and Ganesh Raj Joshi for the 13th Regional EST Forum in Asia. The views expressed herein are those of the authors only and do not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations. Disclaimer: The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this report do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Moreover, the views expressed do not necessarily represent the decision or the stated policy of the UNCRD, nor does citing of trade names or commercial processes constitute endorsement. COVID-19 PANDEMIC AND THE SUBSEQUENT EFFECT ON PUBLIC TRANPORT IN ASIA1 Dipanju Buragohain1, Madan B. Regmi1 and Ganesh Raj Joshi2 1United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific 2United Nations Centre for Regional Development Abstract: Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) outbreak was first reported in Wuhan, P.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract Book, First National Conference on Zoology 2020
    First National Conference on Zoology Biodiversity in a Changing World 28-30 November 2020 Abstracts Organized By Supported By: Foreword It is our pleasure to welcome you to the First National Conference on Zoology: Biodiversity in a Changing World on November 28–30, 2020 on a virtual platform. This conference is organized by the Central Department of Zoology and its Alumni on the occasion of the 55th Anniversary of the Department. This conference is supported by the IUCN Nepal, National Trust for Nature Conservation, WWF Nepal and Zoological Society of London Nepal office. The Central Department of Zoology envisioned three important strategies; teaching, research and extension of its strategic plan 2019 – 2023. The First National Conference is one of the most important extension activities of the Department in collaboration with leading conservation organizations of the country. We believe extension activities including national conference will help to mainstream zoology and make priority agenda of the government for research, faunal conservation, national development and employment. The main theme of the conference is “Biodiversity in a Changing World”, which is of utmost importance given global changes that species, ecosystem processes, landscapes and also people currently have to face together. Excessive exploitation of biological resources as well as global changes and the degradation of the natural environment have large-scale effects, some of which directly lead to the extinction of species and impacts on the health of people. The Conference provides us with the opportunity to meet, connect and learn from each other, share latest research results, and eventually envisage feasible means of conciliating human development and protect health of ecosystem and people with biodiversity conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • How Oli Aimed Ordinance at Splitting Parties but Instead Led to Their Merger
    WITHOUT F EAR OR FAVOUR Nepal’s largest selling English daily Vol XXVIII No. 58 | 8 pages | Rs.5 O O Printed simultaneously in Kathmandu, Biratnagar, Bharatpur and Nepalgunj 34.5 C 4.9 C Friday, April 24, 2020 | 12-01-2077 Nepalgunj Jiri How Oli aimed ordinance at splitting parties but instead led to their merger Two ordinances introduced on Monday culminated in a political drama that saw allegations of kidnapping and the merger of two Madhesi parties long at odds. TIKA R PRADHAN & ANIL GIRI KATHMANDU, APRIL 23 The introduction of two controversial ordinances on Monday by Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli set into motion a chain of events that eventually culminated in the alleged “kidnapping” of a political leader and the long-awaited merger of two Madhesi parties. Late Wednesday night, the Samajbadi Party Nepal and the Rastriya Janata Party Nepal, the third and fourth largest parties in the feder- al parliament, finally agreed to merge in order to “deal a blow to Oli’s ill-in- POST PHOTO: BEEJU MAHARJAN tended move of splitting the Samajbadi A farmer dumps flowers at Ramkot in the Capital’s Nagarjun Municipality as the lockdown due to coronavirus puts florists out of business. Party,” they said. POST PHOTO: KABIN ADHIKARI “We foiled Oli’s plan to split the Samajbadi Party and Rastriya Janata Party Samajbadi Party by deciding to merge applied to the Election Commission on with them,” Rajendra Mahato, a lead- Thursday to register a unified party. er in the six-member Janata Party praesidium, told the Post. However, Samajbadi Party coordi- Nepalis in London face xenophobia amid Covid fears Hours before the merger, Samajbadi nator and former prime minister Party Vice-chair Renu Yadav had Baburam Bhattarai was quick to attempted to split the party with the react, calling Surendra Yadav’s depar- Last week, two cars belonging to former British Gurkhas were set on fire in what is believed to be racially motivated attacks.
    [Show full text]
  • Amnesty International Report 2020/21
    AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL Amnesty International is a movement of 10 million people which mobilizes the humanity in everyone and campaigns for change so we can all enjoy our human rights. Our vision is of a world where those in power keep their promises, respect international law and are held to account. We are independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion and are funded mainly by our membership and individual donations. We believe that acting in solidarity and compassion with people everywhere can change our societies for the better. Amnesty International is impartial. We take no position on issues of sovereignty, territorial disputes or international political or legal arrangements that might be adopted to implement the right to self- determination. This report is organized according to the countries we monitored during the year. In general, they are independent states that are accountable for the human rights situation on their territory. First published in 2021 by Except where otherwise noted, This report documents Amnesty Amnesty International Ltd content in this document is International’s work and Peter Benenson House, licensed under a concerns through 2020. 1, Easton Street, CreativeCommons (attribution, The absence of an entry in this London WC1X 0DW non-commercial, no derivatives, report on a particular country or United Kingdom international 4.0) licence. territory does not imply that no https://creativecommons.org/ © Amnesty International 2021 human rights violations of licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode concern to Amnesty International Index: POL 10/3202/2021 For more information please visit have taken place there during ISBN: 978-0-86210-501-3 the permissions page on our the year.
    [Show full text]
  • Reported and Unregulated (IUU) Fishing and Transnational Crime
    INQUIRY INTO STRENGTHENING AUSTRALIA’S RELATIONSHIPS WITH COUNTRIES IN THE PACIFIC REGION Submission to the Joint Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade by the Office of the Pacific, Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) June 2020 CONTENTS INQUIRY INTO STRENGTHENING AUSTRALIA’S RELATIONSHIPS WITH COUNTRIES IN THE PACIFIC REGION INTRODUCTION 3 CONTEXT 4 IMPACTS OF COVID-19 ON THE PACIFIC AND AUSTRALIA’S ENGAGEMENT 5 IMPLEMENTATION OF THE STEP-UP: ECONOMIC PROSPERITY, SHARED SECURITY & PEOPLE CONNECTIONS IN THE PACIFIC 7 REACHING OUTSIDE GOVERNMENT TO STRENGTHEN THE STEP-UP 10 REFLECTING THE PRIORITY NEEDS OF THE PACIFIC 12 CONCLUSION 14 Inquiry into strengthening Australia’s relationships with countries in the Pacific Region 2 INTRODUCTION Australia’s relationships with its neighbours in the Pacific region are anchored in our common interests and values, our shared history, decades of sustained engagement and our collective interests in a stable, resilient and prosperous Pacific. In partnership over many years with the countries of our region, Australia has worked to help grow economies, to build resilience and to enhance regional stability through our development programs, our defence, policing and border security cooperation and our humanitarian and disaster responses in times of need. As a long-standing partner, Australia has recognised the need to do more to support our Pacific family. The Pacific Step-up is a commitment to lift the ambition and scope of Australia’s engagement, elevating the Pacific to one of our highest foreign policy priorities and making it a central component of Australia’s long-term objective of shaping an open, inclusive and prosperous Indo-Pacific.
    [Show full text]
  • Kyrgyz Post-Soviet Foreign Policy: a Habit of Dependency
    THE LIMITS OF WASHINGTON’S STAYING POWER IN CENTRAL ASIA CROSSROADS POLICY BRIEF No. 7-2020, November 2020 KYRGYZ POST-SOVIET FOREIGN POLICY: A HABIT OF DEPENDENCY Emilbek Dzhuraev OSCE Academy in Bishkek The record of independent foreign policy of Kyrgyzstan may be described, in general, as state-building foreign policy [1]. Much of the country's relations with the outside world were carried out from the perspective of a newly established and still 'under- construction' nation-state. While all of the former Soviet states are eligible for that categorization, Kyrgyzstan has arguably taken a longer time than its fellows in that status of a newcomer or newborn, allowed to err and in need of help. It is that last point – in need of help – supplies one important way to describe the substance or the prevailing nature of Kyrgyzstan’s foreign policy of the nearly thirty years of independence. Needing help – in any form and terms, from grants and aid to loans and deals – and seeking it, or dependency, in a word, has been a defining leitmotif of Bishkek foreign policy. Dependency in foreign policy as proposed here is not the same as in dependency theory and not quite the same as in aid dependency. The former is a macro theory (or rather, a family of theories) of global political economy, mostly a critique of capitalism for its inherent reproduction of inequality, and here the concern is not with that, albeit the overarching conditions of Kyrgyzstan's dependency may be traced to this theory's arguments. The latter is more narrowly a description of a country's actual dependency on foreign aid, such as, arguably, the state of the Afghan economy – a reference that neither fits the urgency of Kyrgyzstan's dependency, nor the scope of what Kyrgyzstan depends on.
    [Show full text]
  • Examining the Pressure on Human Rights in Kyrgyzstan
    Retreating Rights: Examining the pressures on human rights in Kyrgyzstan Executive Summary Kyrgyzstan has just experienced another period of rapid and chaotic change, the third time the country has overthrown an incumbent President in the last 15 years. This publication shows how the roots of the problem run deep. It explores how a culture of corruption and impunity have been at the heart of Kyrgyzstan’s institutional failings, problems that have sometimes been overlooked or downplayed because of the comparison to challenges elsewhere in Central Asia, but that were ruthlessly exposed by the COVID-19 pandemic. The publication tries to explain the recent emergence of the new President Sadyr Japarov in the unrest of October 2020 and what it might mean for the future of Kyrgyzstan. An instinctive anti-elite populist with a powerful personal narrative and a past reputation for economic nationalism Japarov is undertaking a rapid consolidation of power, including through controversial constitutional reform. Liberal minded civil society has been under increasing pressure throughout the last decade. They have faced successive governments increasingly seeking to regulate and pressure them and a rising tide of nationalism that has seen hatred against civil society activists expressed on the streets and online, particularly due to the weaponisation of work on women’s and LGBTQ rights. The publication proposes a root and branch rethink of donor initiatives in Kyrgyzstan to take stock of the situation and come again with new ways to help, including the need for greater flexibility to respond to local issues, opportunities for new ideas and organisations to be supported, and a renewed focus on governance, transparency and accountability.
    [Show full text]
  • Fiji 2020 Human Rights Report
    FIJI 2020 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Fiji is a constitutional republic. In 2018 the country held general elections, which international observers deemed free, transparent, and credible. Josaia Voreqe (Frank) Bainimarama’s Fiji First party won 27 of 51 seats in parliament, and he began a second four-year term as prime minister. The Fiji Police Force maintains internal security. The Republic of Fiji Military Force is responsible for external security but may also have some domestic security responsibilities in specific circumstances. Both report to the Ministry of Defense, National Security, and Policing. Civilian authorities maintained effective control over the security forces. Members of the security forces committed numerous abuses. Significant human rights issues included: cases of cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment, in some cases leading to death; restrictions on free expression, such as substantial interference with the right of peaceful assembly; and trafficking in persons. The government investigated some security force officials who committed abuses and prosecuted or punished officials who committed abuses elsewhere in the government; however, impunity was a problem in cases with political implications. Section 1. Respect for the Integrity of the Person, Including Freedom from: a. Arbitrary Deprivation of Life and Other Unlawful or Politically Motivated Killings In April, four corrections officers at the Lautoka Corrections Center allegedly murdered one remand prisoner and assaulted two others. The officers were arrested and charged; on September 15, a court granted the officers bail. As of year’s end, the trial had not yet opened. b. Disappearance There were no reports of disappearances by or on behalf of government authorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Guiding the Hand of God: the Influence of State Involvement in Religion on Religionational Identity by Dustin Gamza a Dissertati
    Guiding the Hand of God: The Influence of State Involvement in Religion on Religionational Identity by Dustin Gamza A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Political Science) in the University of Michigan 2019 Doctoral Committee: Professor Pauline Jones, Chair Associate Professor Robert Mickey Professor Mark Tessler Professor Geneviève Zubrzycki Dustin Gamza [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5233-6719 © Dustin Gamza 2019 i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am grateful to all those who made this dissertation possible, whether it be through their support, advice, or comradery. I am thankful to the Weiser Center for Emerging Democracies, the University of Michigan’s International Institute, Georgetown University’s Berkley Center for Religion, Peace & World Affairs, and the Boren Fellowship for providing platforms and funding that allowed me to begin my studies into religion and politics in the post-Soviet space. I am also grateful to the American University of Central Asia and their Central Asian Studies Institute for providing me an institutional home during my fieldwork that served as the foundation for this project, to the National Science Foundation for funding my survey in Kyrgyzstan, and to PIL Research Company for doing an excellent job administering the survey. Many people have provided me support throughout this endeavor. I owe thanks to Nurbek Bekmurzaev, who served as a guide, a translator, a co-researcher, and above all a friend during my time in Kyrgyzstan; to Alton Worthington and Anil Menon, who provided me with helpful advice on my methods; to Andrew Walker and Ana María Silva, who always provided a voice of reason and an escape through conversation and music; to my cohort in the political science department who embarked on this journey with me; and to all my Ann Arbor friends who spent countless nights with me cooking meals, playing games, and creating worlds.
    [Show full text]