To View the PDF File

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

To View the PDF File Interview with Norman Berson February 8, 1979 Trying to describe how I first got interested in the political problems in Philadelphia takes a little bit of telling. We were married I guess in '55 and lived in Center City ever since Lenore and I were married. It became clear, I guess, at the end of when Dick Dilworth resigned to run for Governor and Jim Tate became mayor that the kind of government that we were having -- that we had in Philadelphia under Clark and Dilworth was not going to continue. I don't remember what year it was that you ran in the primary against Jim Tate — '63? At that time we participated in some small way in your primary election. There was a slate of candidates for Council at that time running with you. In my recollection there was Joy Takiff, Judge Takiff's wife; Dave Savitt, who is now the administrative judge of the Common Pleas Court; there were a couple of others who I can't recall who were on that Councilmanic slate, who all ran that year and we did a little fundraising for that councilmanic slate and we got interested at that point. Then I guess it was a year or so later that Tom McBride, a very distinguished Philadelphia lawyer, had been appointed to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. He would then have to run for a full term. I guess Governor Leader had appointed him. And -the regular Democratic organization selected the man who is now the present Chief Justice of Pennsylvania in preference to McBride. Several of us met with McBride and finally prevailed on him to go into a primary race for the seat on the Supreme Court, but McBride lost. We had sort of been peripherally involved up until the formation out of that McBride thing and out of your campaign grew the Central Philadelphia Reform Democrats — that was a group of people who had been involved in the Walter Phillips campaign for mayor in the primary election in '63. Gordon Cavenaugh, who is now the head of the Farmer's Home Loan Administration in the Carter administration. Gordon was the prime mover in forming the reform democrats. Gordon lived up here on Woodstock Street just off Race and he was one of the prime movers. I got involved — Libby Goldstein, there were several others. Cathleen Mulhearn, who owns the Garden Restaurant, was involved. There were a whole group of people. We could see we were getting regularly beaten because of the ward organization that had 2. been created in the city and what we thought we would do is start at the bottom level and try and create -- take some of these committeemen's jobs and take over some of these wards and get some voice in the politics of Philadelphia — particularly Democratic politics because it seemed at that point that it was a hopelessly Democratic city. It was just no way it was going to change back — at least not for a long time. And in '64, I guess, we ran a slate of candidates in what was then the old 7th ward and in the 8th ward — fewer candidates in the 8th, many more in the 7th. Those have all now since been amalgated into the 8th ward. And while we did fairly well in the 7th ward, after a number of law suits and shooting and hollering, in the 8th ward I was the only one that was able to get elected committeeman in '64 and again in '66. Now in '66 I ran again and at that time all of these small center city wards had been amalgamated into — we had a bunch of what we called rotten borroughs — wards that were just a couple of blocks long and a couple of blocks wide. And there was a ward realignment and all of them were amalgamated into one — all the Center City wards west of Broad Street from the Parkway down to Lombard were amalgamated into one big 8th ward. I guess it was basically Gordon Cavenaugh who got me interested in this, although we had worked in the McBride campaign and in your campaign even before the Reform Democrats were formed and I guess it was Gordon basically who formed it and who got me interested. Gordon had been a classmate of mine at Penn law school, as had Dave Savitt and we had known each other for a good many years and were good friends. We — the Reform Democrats have attempted to reform the policies of not only city government but as it has developed since the days of Clark and Dilworth. But also we have never been able to work in very close harmony -- or any kind of harmony — with the regular organization. We have tried from time to time to get them to slate the kind of people we think they ought to slate, but we have been rarely successful. I first ran for the state legislature in 1966 as a result of one man, one vote decision of the Supreme Court. They realigned all of the legislative districts to make them equal in population and it then became clear that they had carved out a kind of new district in Center City and I ran for that in an election where the organization used every method under the sun to try and defeat me and I just barely won that. They tried again to defeat me two years later in a primary and they tried two years after that, so I have fought three very difficult primary elections with the organization.' I think I was able to win because my 3. wife's a better politician than they are and we just worked harder and we had basically the kind of approach that appeals to people in Center City, which is government officials who are accountable and who are responsible and have some sense of honesty and integrity and don't serve their own interests but serve the interests of the voters. (WMP: You had a complete organization of committeemen, I guess.) What happened with that was by the third time that they had run candidates against me in the primary election I decided that it was really very important that I not have to go through the job of recruiting poll workers every two years and that it would be so much better if we just took over the regular ward structure in the 8th ward and what we did in 1970 was to run a slate of committeemen in every division in the ward against the regular organization committeemen, except in those few divisions where we already had people. (WMP: How many divisions were there?) There are 29 divisions and we ran 58 candidates. We started a year before — one solid year before — to recruit people to run. It took a year to find the 58 candidates in every division. We were looking primarily for people who had their roots, who lived in the divisions, who had lived there, who weren't transients, who had their roots in the divisions and knew people in those divisions so we could get votes on election day. And sure enough we were successful and we elected the overwhelming majority of the committeemen in the ward. Fortunately for us the ward leader at that time was State Senator Benjamin Donolow, who was a very convenient target to shoot at because Donolow didn't live in the ward. He was a non-resident and treated Center City as a sort of political plantation. (WMP: He was sort of a shady character.) I don't know. He. was -- Philadelphia magazine once described him as a connoisseur of the unsavory. I'll rest with that description of him. I'm told that one shouldn't speak ill of the dead so we'll just let it go at that. But he was a convenient target to shoot at. He was an absentee. He wasn't a very pleasant personality and people in Center City couldn't for the life of them — paying the high rents and enjoying the neighborhood as they do — understand why a man who represented the area in Harrisburg and was the ward 4. leader wouldn't want to live there. But he didn't. He lived out in Overbrook Park out in Montgomery County and didn't make very much of a real hard attempt to conceal it. It was rather brazen. His car was registered out there and his children, if you looked at their school records it showed that that was their home address. He really didn't make any terrific effort. People in Center City just have to watch who is walking through Rittenhouse Square each day on their way to work to know who really lives in the area and who doesn't and it's not hard. It's a neighborhood. More cosmopolitan than most, but people know. (WMP: How did Donolow get into that position?) He got in on the first swing that took Joe Clark into the mayor's office. A bunch of these characters rode in with him, like Morrie Osser, and Benny Donolow, and some of these others. (WMP: I'm amazed because I thought Jim Finnegan, who was running the party at that time, wouldn't have gone for them.) I get the impression that they never really felt that they could oust the incumbent Republicans who had been there for a hundred years. And they just let people run and lo and behold Clark swept in and he took everybody in with him.
Recommended publications
  • Gay Era (Lancaster, PA)
    LGBT History Project of the LGBT Center of Central PA Located at Dickinson College Archives & Special Collections http://archives.dickinson.edu/ Documents Online Title: Gay Era (Lancaster, PA) Date: March 1976 Location: LGBT-001 Joseph W. Burns Collection Periodicals Collection Contact: LGBT History Project Archives & Special Collections Waidner-Spahr Library Dickinson College P.O. Box 1773 Carlisle, PA 17013 717-245-1399 [email protected] “SNUFF” SNUFFED Philadelphia feminists, coordinated by I DYKETACTICS! - a radical feminist lesbian collective - shortened the run of the movie "Snuff’' from a scheduled three-week engagement to one and a half days. I "Snuff" is a commercialization of a type of underground pornographic film in which the actual murder and dismember­ ment of women takes place. According to straight press accounts which appeared in the New York Times last summer,the underground films were being made in Argentina and distributed in the U.S. for private showings at $200.00 each. The commercial venture was protested here because the film's advertising made it unclear whether actresses in the film are actually murdered. The ads are also racist, saying: "Filmed in South America where life is cheap !" When concerned women from the com­ munity in which the film was to be shown attempted to negotiate with the theatre's managemen they were refused a meet­ ing. DYKE a ACTICS! called their own meeting and twenty women attended. It was pointed out that when men at­ tempt to act out the violent fantasies this type of film inspires, lesbians become victims as do other women who are not escorted by men.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania House Of
    1 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES House Appropriations Committee and House Judiciary Committee ---------------- -x PENNSYLVANIA PLAN FOR : PRIVACY AND SECURITY : OF CRIMINAL HISTORY RECORD INFORMATION : -------------- -x Majority Caucus Room House of Representatives Main Capitol Building Harrisburg, Pennsylvania Thursday, November 4, 19 76 Met, pursuant to notice at 10:10 a.m. BEFORE: For the Judiciary Committee: NORMAN BERSON, Chairman ROBERT O'DONNEL ANTHONY SCIRICA WILLIAM HUTCHINSON For the Appropriations Committee THOMAS FEE ROBERT GEISLER JAMES GOODMAN AMOS HUTCHINSON IVAN ITKIN JOEL JOHNSON JOSEPH KOLTER RUSSELL KOWALYSHYN WILLIAM SHANE FRED SHUPNIK RUDOLPH DININI GUY KISTLER CHARLES MEBUS L. EUGENE SMITH STAFF: For the Judiciary Committee SAM MC CLEA For the Appropriations Committee STEVE ROSSKOPF For the Speaker's office ROBERT KAGAN, Esq. -0- CONTENT_S_ SPEAKER PAGE ERNEST P. KLINE, Lieutenant Governor, 4 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania JOSEPH RIGGIONE, Director, Governor's 54 Task Force on Criminal Justice 19 7. Information Systems MICHAEL GARRITY, Deputy Attorney General, 135 Department of Justice, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania ALBERT F. KwIATEK, Pennsylvania State 149 Police LAWRENCE J. BEASER, Counsel to the Governor 177 -0- LE°_CEEDI_NGS_ CHAIRMAN BERSON: Would each committee member state his name and the committee that he belongs to it can be on the record. REPRESENTATIVE KISLLER: Guy Kisller, 'Cumberland, Appropriations. REPRESENTATIVE ITKIN: Representative Itkin, Allegheny, Appropriations. REPRESENTATIVE
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Transportation in Philadelphia, 1946-1984
    ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: “LET THE PEOPLE HAVE A VICTORY”: THE POLITICS OF TRANSPORTATION IN PHILADELPHIA, 1946-1984 Jacob Kobrick, Ph.D., 2010 Directed By: Professor Robyn L. Muncy Department of History Urban transportation planning in the United States underwent important changes in the decades after World War II. In the immediate postwar period, federal highway engineers in the Bureau of Public Roads dominated the decision-making process, creating a planning regime that focused almost entirely on the building of modern expressways to relieve traffic congestion. In the 1960s, however, local opposition to expressway construction emerged in cities across the nation, reflecting growing discontent with what many citizens perceived to be a closed planning process that resulted in the destruction of urban neighborhoods, environmental degradation, and inadequate attention paid to alternative modes of transportation. Local freeway protestors found allies in the new U.S. Department of Transportation, which moved in the mid-1960s to absorb the Bureau of Public Roads and support legislation promoting a planning process more open to local input as well as a greater emphasis on federal aid for urban mass transportation. The changing culture of transportation planning produced a series of freeway revolts, resulting in the cancellation or modification of interstate highway projects, in major American cities. Changes in transportation planning played out differently in every city, however. This dissertation examines controversies over Philadelphia’s major expressway projects – the Schuylkill Expressway, the Delaware Expressway, and the never-built Crosstown Expressway, in addition to major mass transit developments such as the city’s subsidization of the commuter railroads, the creation of the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, and the building of a railroad tunnel known as the Center City Commuter Connection, in order to trace the evolution of the city’s transportation politics between 1946 and 1984.
    [Show full text]
  • The Frats Are at It Again SMC Activities for Next Week
    Homecoming 71 It’s all over.. by Larry Marion “ Coming up,” theme for Dre­ xel’s 1971 Homecoming, was car­ icatured by a huge tuition .bill reflecting the constant tuition increases, and a disappointing turnout at the Sugarloaf concert. Over 400 tickets were sold to THISTLETHWAITE the two shows and champagne party bash held last Friday night Drexel’s homecoming queen is safely delivered by helicopter. in the Main Auditorium and the DAC, the 7:30 p.m. show was the most popular, drawing over 300 people, the rest showed up for Verne Cozzolino the 9:30 show. “Wax,” the bright football game. (See sports The frats are at it again back-up group for the two shows pages). The Queen and her court were delivered to the field by Don Hendler shorted out all their electronic Last week Drexel’s fraternities erupted once equipment, and consequently did by the ARCO helicopter, pro­ Last Friday, representatives of the twelve fra­ vided free by those friendly pol­ again. This time their activities Involved paint not perform the second show. ternities met to determine a procedure for handling luters. throwing and fistfighting by brothers of three of “ 1200 roast beef sandwiches, incidents of this type. In order to become an of­ Many students felt that the the University’s twelve frats. The participants 480 bottles of Cold Duck cham­ ficial part of the I-F bylaws; however, such a pro­ Sugarloaf concert was more in this particular melee were brothers from pagne, and 1000 champagne cedure must be ratified by members of the I.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Silhouette (1958)
    r^v 1 S^Pfe^v ' : >«, I. 'I ! MroiffliwiM^wraffiKiaaawftiva^^ WM jm? m -v-'.$t\ J$&% j #* ¥ ?*&* ,«*WS :• < ** «> %tfir v ri^'Ht Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2010 with funding from Lyrasis Members and Sloan Foundation http://www.archive.org/details/silhouette195800agne 1958 silhouette published by the students i& &~. ' ll l£4 M j*/0** '* * 4 " ' : : u4 ldl& Ji^ if g <3aj*ftfa> :~*-~. n %* ft! %r . 4 r4 $ Dedication .... 6 Features 16 Organizations . 52 Athletics 78 Faculty 90 Classes Advertising . sfe 1958 Silhouette Dedication Mr. P. J. Rogers Auctioning cakes for student charity drives is frequently the job of Mr. Rogers. Mr. P. J. Rogers is the man behind the scenes at Agnes Scott. As Business Manager of the College, he has a tremendous task in the practical, everyday job of keeping the college going. It is his place to supervise the maintenance, the budget, the buying of equipment, and all repairwork of the school. Add to these the many miscellaneous jobs which fall to him daily, and it is indeed amazing to note the com- petency, swiftness, and effectiveness with which he works. Despite the fact that every student uses his services everyday, we are often unaware of the vital part which he plays in making our life more com- fortable and happy. There are other things which anyone who has contact with Mr. Rogers is immediately aware of. Those things are his wonderful personality, his sin- cere friendliness toward every student, and his cooperative willingness to help in any situation. No matter how small the job, from buying paper to mov- ing furniture, he receives you with a smile, listens to you attentively, and then immediately takes steps to grant the favor you ask.
    [Show full text]
  • Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
    COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA MONDAY, FEBRUARY 5,1979 Session of 1979 lb3rd of the General Assembly Vol. 1, No. 3 An Act implementing the addition of section 4.1 to Article IV OF of the Constitution of Pennsylvania; establishing the Office of TheHouse convened at 1p.m., e.s.t. Attorney General elected by the citizens a~d+setting forth powers and duties of the Attorney General;' THE SPEAKER (H. JACK SELTZER) IN THE CHAIR Referred to Committee on Judiciary. PRAYER No. 3 By Messrs. RYAN, SALVATORE, NOYE, THE HONORABLE DAVID R. WRIGHT, member of the ANDERSON, IRVIS, DiCARLO and House of Representatives and guest chaplain, offered the fol- MANDERINO lowing prayer: A Joint Resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitu- 0 Lord, our Lord, whose ways are excellent in all the earth, tion of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania by providing for additional judges for the superior court,changing certainpro. grant us perception to see the excellence of Thy grandest work, visions relating to initial terms, and further providing for the so that we in truth may proclaim, I have believed the best of presidentjudgeof theSuperiorCourt. every man and I find and believe it is enough to show a bad man Referred to Committee on Judiciary. at his best and even a good man to swing his lantern higher. Amen. No. 4 By Messrs. SALVATORE, GREENFIELD, NOYE, POLITE, F. J.LYNCH, PERZEL, JOURNAL APPROVAL POSTPONED D. S. HAYES, HELFRICK, CORNELL, VROON, FREIND, GOEBEL, D. M. The SPEAKER. Without objection, approval of the Journal FISHER, RYAN, BOWSER, GLADECK, for Tuesday, January 16,1979,will be postponed until printed.
    [Show full text]
  • Hlanrbpatpr Leupmng Upralb Financing Post-High Schooe Theo Badenhuizen, Director of Style Harmony
    < biggin Racks The Weather PAGE TWENTY- MANCHESTER EVENING HEaiALD. Mancheater. Conn., Mon.. Oct. 9,1972 ficers will rehearse at 6:15. Mtw SPEBSQSA, will rehean* ton||^t Vp lOOth Win Scholarship Service will be given, at the KofC Home at 8. FVlr tonight, low in the u m w the meeUng, refreshments will be 30i. FUr and milder WedneMbo, ^m lnars are free. rehearsal la open to all men See Page 10 A b o u t T o w n served. highs near 70. Manchester Police interested In singing barbershop- Hlanrbpatpr lEupmng Upralb Financing post-high schooE Theo Badenhuizen, director of style harmony. Obituary northbound car operated by John The religious education board MANCHESTER education will be the subject of the Lutz Junior Museum, vylll of Second Congregational Church J. Walker, 57, of 9 Eldridge St. the third seminar, tomorrow at — Carmine M. Viterito, 18, of 118 appear on the Ranger Andy will meet tonight at 7:30 at the The Senior Citizeni Italian MANCHESTER, CONN., TUESDAY,.OCTOBER 10,1B72 VOL. XCH. No. 8 MANCHESTER A City of Village Charm SIXTEEN PAGES Walker was Issded a written war­ 7:15 p.m. in the Manchester High PRICE FIFTEEN CR V n affairs and was a member of its N. Elm St., was charged Sunday television program Ihesday at church. The board of deaconesses Night program will be Thursday Andrew G. Zale ning for driving after drinking, Schtiol cafeteria, for parents of Republican Town Committee and night with fourth-degree larceny, 3:30 p.m. on Channel 3, V^IC.
    [Show full text]
  • LGBTQ+ Youth Advocacy (Children’S Law Center, 2015) - Provides a Compilation of Best Practices That Have Been Found to Meet the Needs of LGBTQ+ Youth
    Supporting LGBTQ+ Students: Providing a Safe Zone Dr. Carrie R. Jackson, BCBA Professor, Youngstown State University School Psychologist, West Middlesex Area School District Wednesday, November 4, 2020 Session Overview • Participants will learn more about: • How sexuality and gender influence everyday experiences & the impact on students and their families in the educational setting. • Written antidiscrimination policies regarding LGBTQ+ students. • Legal and ethical issues (state and federal). • Training of educators and administrator support. • Inclusiveness of curriculum. • Creating and sustaining meaningful change in schools. Core Vocabulary • Ally; Asexual; Biological sex; Biphobia; Bisexual; Cisgender; Coming out; Gay; Gender expression; Gender identity; Genderqueer; Heteronormativity; Homophobia; Homosexual; Intersex; Lesbian; Pansexual; Passing; Queer; Questioning; Romantic attraction; Sexual attraction; Sexual orientation; Straight; Transgender; Transphobia • https://thesafezoneproject.com/wp- content/uploads/2015/08/Core-Vocabulary- Do_Don’t-Handout.pdf Impact on Students and Families Significance in Schools • A survey of 12,000 LGBTQ+ teenagers across the United States was completed by the Human Rights Campaign Foundation and the University of Connecticut in 2017, indicating the challenges these teens experience. • Study revealed that LGBTQ+ teenagers experience high levels of stress, anxiety, and rejection, as well as feeling unsafe in schools. • Participants indicated that supportive families and inclusive schools are key
    [Show full text]
  • Commonwealth of Pennsylvania House of Representatives
    COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES House Appropriations Committee and House Judiciary Committee _____________ _x PENNSYLVANIA PLAN FOR : PRIVACY AND SECURITY : OF CRIMINAL HISTORY : RECORD INFORMATION : _____________ _x Majority Caucus Room House of Representatives Main Capitol Building Harrisburg, Pennsylvania Friday, November 5, 19 76 Met, pursuant to adjournment, at 10:05 a.m. BEFORE: 'For the Judiciary Committee: NORMAN BERSON, Chairman ROBERT O'DONNEL ANTHONY SCIRICA WILLIAM HUTCHINSON For the Appropriations Committee: THOMAS FEE AMOS HUTCHINSON IVAN ITKIN JOSEPH KOLTER RUSSELL KOWALYSHYN FRED SHUPNIK RUDOLPH DININI GUY KISTLER L. EUGENE SMITH STAFF: For the Judiciary Committee SAM MC CLEA For the Appropriations Committee STEVE ROSSKOPF For the Speaker's office ROBERT KAGAN, Esq. -0- ^10 £0NTENTS_ SPEAKER PAGE PETER J. LIACOURAS, Dean, Temple Law School 217 ROBERT MORRISON, Administrative Assistant 255 to Director of Public Safety, Harrisburg IAN H. LENNOX, speaking for D. Donald 261 Jamison, Citizens Crime Commission IRVING CHASEN, Director, Philadelphia Justice 274 Information System RAYMOND M. SEIDEL, Citizen 30 7 • MICHAEL PACKENHAM, Director, Freedom of 318 Information Committee of Greater Philadelphia Chapter of the Society of Professional Journalists JAMES HERRON, Police Department, Philadelphia 34 2 EDWARD ROBINSON, American Civil Liberties Union 356 STEPHANIE M. GRECO, Women in Communication 37 3 -0- E.E2£EE_DI_NGS CHAIRMAN BERSON: This is the second day of public hearings, specifically directed to the Pennsylvania Plan for Privacy and Security of Criminal History Record Information developed by the Governor's Task Force on criminal •justice information systems. Our first witness, today, is Dean Peter J. Liacouras of Temple University Law School, who, of course, has distributed,already,copies of his statement.
    [Show full text]
  • Interests and Politics in Sentencing Reform: the Development of Sentencing Guidelines in Minnesota and Pennsylvania
    Volume 29 Issue 1 Article 2 1984 Interests and Politics in Sentencing Reform: The Development of Sentencing Guidelines in Minnesota and Pennsylvania Susan E. Martin Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/vlr Part of the Criminal Law Commons, and the Criminal Procedure Commons Recommended Citation Susan E. Martin, Interests and Politics in Sentencing Reform: The Development of Sentencing Guidelines in Minnesota and Pennsylvania, 29 Vill. L. Rev. 21 (1984). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/vlr/vol29/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Villanova Law Review by an authorized editor of Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. Martin: Interests and Politics in Sentencing Reform: The Development of S 1983-84] INTERESTS AND POLITICS IN SENTENCING REFORM: THE DEVELOPMENT OF SENTENCING GUIDELINES IN MINNESOTA AND PENNSYLVANIA SUSAN E. MARTINt TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ... ......................................... 22 II. THE POLITICAL AND LEGAL CONTEXT OF SENTENCING REFORM ................................................... 25 A. The Nature of the Problem ............................. 25 B. CriminalJustice Systems in Mnnesota and Pennsylvania ... 28 III. THE POLITICS OF SENTENCING REFORM IN M INNESOTA ............................................... 34 A . The Legislation ...................................... 34 1. The Legislative Battle ............................. 34 2. The Provisions of the Law ......................... 39 3. The Role of Interest Groups in Shaping the Sentencing Law ............................................ 4 1 B. Formulating the Guidelines ............................. 43 1. The Key Elements in Shaping the Guidelines ......... 43 2. Constructing the Guidelines ......................... 50 3. Endorsements and Interest Group Positions ............ 58 4. The 1980 Legislative Session Strategy ..............
    [Show full text]
  • Gay Era (Lancaster, PA)
    LGBT History Project of the LGBT Center of Central PA Located at Dickinson College Archives & Special Collections http://archives.dickinson.edu/ Documents Online Title: Gay Era (Lancaster, PA) Date: April 1974 Location: LGBT-001 Joseph W. Burns Collection Periodicals Collection Contact: LGBT History Project Archives & Special Collections Waidner-Spahr Library Dickinson College P.O. Box 1773 Carlisle, PA 17013 717-245-1399 [email protected] suPREme COURT SfiYS ••nfiY” OfiGRY (reprinted from Philadelphia Gayzette) The New York Times reported that the Supreme Court in a 6 to 3 decision, ruled "that states may prosecute and imprison people for committing homosexual acts even when both parties to an act are con­ senting adults and the act occurs in private. "The ruling sharply departs from a ten year trend in which the high court had in­ creasingly expanded the concept of the con­ stitutional right to privacy. "In effect, the Court found that the right to privacy does not include the right ofwill- ing adult homosexuals to engage privately in their chosen sexual conduct. " The Supreme Court made its decision without holding hearings or issuing any opinion. It simply upheld the ruling of a lower federal court which had rejected a challenge to a Virginia law prohibiting con­ sensual sodomy. The lower court, in its written opinion, found that the Virginia law did not violate the right to privacy, the ban against cruel and unusual punishment, or the rights to due process of freedom of ex­ pression. Only three justices dissented from the decision: Brennan, Marshall, and Stevens. They expressed a desire to have hearings on the case before rendering a decision.
    [Show full text]