DOCSLIB.ORG

Why Unary and Binary Operations in Logic: General Result Motivated by Interval-Valued Logics Hung T

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Why Unary and Binary Operations in Logic: General Result Motivated by Interval-Valued Logics Hung T University of Texas at El Paso DigitalCommons@UTEP Departmental Technical Reports (CS) Department of Computer Science 3-1-2001 Why Unary and Binary Operations in Logic: General Result Motivated by Interval-Valued Logics Hung T. Nguyen Vladik Kreinovich University of Texas at El Paso, [email protected] I. R. Goodman Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.utep.edu/cs_techrep Part of the Computer Engineering Commons Comments: UTEP-CS-01-07. Published in the Proceedings of the Joint 9th World Congress of the International Fuzzy Systems Association and 20th International Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society IFSA/NAFIPS 2001, Vancouver, Canada, July 25-28, 2001, pp. 1991-1996. Recommended Citation Nguyen, Hung T.; Kreinovich, Vladik; and Goodman, I. R., "Why Unary and Binary Operations in Logic: General Result Motivated by Interval-Valued Logics" (2001). Departmental Technical Reports (CS). Paper 371. http://digitalcommons.utep.edu/cs_techrep/371 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Computer Science at DigitalCommons@UTEP. It has been accepted for inclusion in Departmental Technical Reports (CS) by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UTEP. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Why Unary and Binary Operations in Logic: General Result Motivated by Interval-Valued Logics Hung T. Nguyen Vladik Kreinovich Mathem. Sciences, New Mexico State Univ. Comp. Science, Univ. of Texas at El Paso Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA El Paso, TX 79968, USA [email protected] [email protected] I.R. Goodman Code D42215, Space & Naval Warfare Systems Center San Diego, CA 92152, USA [email protected] Abstract We are interested in explaining why unary and binary logical operations are the only basic ones. If we assume Traditionally, in logic, only unary and binary operations that the logic of human reasoning is the two-valued are used as basic ones – e.g., “not”, “and”, “or” – while (classical) logic, then the possibility to transform every the only ternary (and higher order) operations are the logical function into a DNF form explains this empirical operations which come from a combination of unary fact. and binary ones. For the classical logic, with the binary set of truth values ¢¡¤£¦¥¨§ , the possibility to express an However, classical logic is not a perfect description of arbitrary operation in terms of unary and binary ones is human reasoning: for example, it does not take into con- well known: it follows, e.g., from the well known pos- sideration fuzziness and uncertainty of human reason- sibility to express an arbitrary operation in DNF form. ing. This uncertainty is taken into consideration in fuzzy ¡¤£¦¥ A similar representation result for © -based logic was logic [9, 25, 29]. In the traditional fuzzy logic, the set ¡¤£¥ ( proven in our previous paper. In this paper, we expand of truth values is the entire interval © . This this result to finite logics (more general than classical interval has a natural notion of continuity, so it is natu- logic) and to multi-D analogues of the fuzzy logic – both ral to restrict ourselves to continuous unary and binary motivated by interval-valued fuzzy logics. operations. With this restriction in place, a natural question is: can ¡£¥ ¡¤£¥ #+% © an arbitrary continuous function )!*© be represented as a composition of continuous unary and 1. Introduction binary operations? The positive answer to this question was obtained in our papers [19, 22]. Traditionally, in logic, only unary and binary operations ¡£¥ In © -based fuzzy logic, an arbitrary logical operation are used as basic ones – e.g., “not”, “and”, “or” – while can be represented as a composition of unary and binary the only ternary (and higher order) operations are the ¡¤£¦¥ ones. However, the © -based fuzzy logic is, by itself, operations which come from a combination of unary only an approximation to the actual human reasoning and binary ones. about uncertainty. A natural question is: are such combinations sufficient? Indeed, how can we describe the expert’s degree of con- I.e., to be more precise, can an arbitrary logical op- / fidence ,.-0/21 in a certain statement ? A natural way eration be represented as a combination of unary and to determine this degree is, e.g., to ask an expert to es- binary ones? timate his degree of confidence on a scale from 0 to 10. ¥¦¡ 6587 For the classical logic, with the binary set of truth values If he selects 8, then we take ,3-4/21 . ¨¨£¤¨§ ¡£¥§ (= ), the positive answer to this To get a more accurate result, we can then ask the same question is well known. Indeed, it is known that an arbi- expert to estimate his degree of confidence on a finer $#&%' trary logical operation "! can be represented, scale, e.g., from 0 to 100, etc. For example, if an expert ¥ ¥¦¡9¡ ¡¤: ¥ 7 5 e.g., in DNF form and thus, it can indeed be represented 5 selects 81, we will take ,.-0/21 . If we as a combination of unary (“not”) and binary (“and” and want an even more accurate estimate, we can ask the “or”) operations. expert to estimate his degree of confidence on an even Uncertainty of expert estimates is only one reason why ¡¤£¥ finer scale, etc. we may want to go beyond the traditional © -valued logic; there are also other reasons: The problem with this approach is that experts cannot describe their degrees of too fine scales. For example, an expert can point to 8 on a scale from 0 to 10, but this A 1-D value is a reqsonable way of describing the same expert will hardly be able to pinpoint a value on a uncertainty of a single expert. However, the con- ¯ scale from 0 to 100. fidence strongly depends on the it consensus be- tween different experts. We may want to use ad- So, to attain a more adequate description of human ditional dimensions to describe how many expert ¡£¥ reasoning, we must modify the traditional © -based share the original expert’s opinion, and to what de- fuzzy logic. Two types of modifications have been pro- gree; see, e.g., [13, 23]. posed. Different experts may strongly disagree. To de- One possibility is to take the finest (finite) scale which scribe the dgeree of this disagreement, we also an expert can still use, and take the values on this scale need additional numerical characteristics, which as the desired degrees of confidence. This approach make the resulting logic multi-D; see, e.g., [21]. leads to a finite-valued fuzzy logic, in which the set of truth values is finite. In all these cases, we need a multi-D logic to adequately This approach has been successfully used in practice; describe expert’s degree of confidence. see, e.g., [1, 5, 20, 26]. It is therefore desirable to check In this paper, we show that both for finite-valued logics whether in a finite logic, every operation can be repre- and for multi-D logics, every logical operation can be sented as a composition of unary and binary operations. represented as a composition of unary and binary op- The problem with finite-valued logics is that the set erations. Thus, we give a general explanation for the of resulting truth values depends on which scale we use. above empirical fact. Instead of fixing a finite set, we can describe the expert’s ¡¤£¦¥ degree of confidence by an interval from © . For ex- ample, if an expert estimates his degree of confidence 2. Finite-Valued Logics by a value 8 on a 0 to 10 scale, then the only thing that we know about the expert’s degree of confidence is that 2.1. What Was Known Before it is closer to 0.8 (8/10) than to 0.7 or to 0.9, i.e., that it ¡¤: £¡¤: ¢¡ 5£¡ belongs to the interval © . In the Introduction, we have already mentioned that for ¡£¥¨§ So, a natural way of describing degrees of confidence the 2-element set of truth values , an ar- # % £ ! © ¥§¦ ¥©¨ more adequately is to use intervals ¤ instead bitrary logical operation can be repre- of real numbers. In this representation, real numbers can sented as a composition of unary and binary operations. be viewed as particular – degenerate – cases of intervals Specifically, in this case, an arbitrary logical operation % £ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ © . The idea of using intervals have been originally can be represented as a composition of negation , proposed by Zadeh himself and further developed by conjunction , and disjunction . Bandler and Kohout [2], Turks¨ ¸en [27], and others; for a In [6], we proved that the same is true for the case when recent survey, see, e.g., [24]. is a finite Boolean algebra. Specifically, we prove In interval-valued fuzzy approach, to describe each de- that for such sets , an arbitrary logical operation can be gree of confidence, we must describe two real numbers: represented as a composition of negation, conjunction the lower endpoint and the upper endpoint of the corre- (“intersection”), disjunction (“union”), constants, and a sponding “confidence interval”. special unary operation called absolute truth: We can go one step further and take into consideration Definition 1. For an arbitrary Boolean algebra , -¥ 1 that the endpoints of the corresponding interval are also we define an absolute truth operation as follows: - 1 -¥ 1 ¥ not precisely known. Thus, each of these endpoints is, and for all . in actuality, an interval itself. So, to describe a degree of -31 The function is similar to the delta-function (see, confidence, we now need four real numbers: two to de- e.g., [30]), which is defined, crudely speaking, as a scribe the lower endpoint, and two to describe the upper function which is different from 0 only at one point ¡ one.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Operations Per Se, to See If the Proposed Chi Is Indeed Fruitful
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 204 124 SE 035 176 AUTHOR Weaver, J. F. TTTLE "Addition," "Subtraction" and Mathematical Operations. 7NSTITOTION. Wisconsin Univ., Madison. Research and Development Center for Individualized Schooling. SPONS AGENCY Neional Inst. 1pf Education (ED), Washington. D.C. REPORT NO WIOCIS-PP-79-7 PUB DATE Nov 79 GRANT OS-NIE-G-91-0009 NOTE 98p.: Report from the Mathematics Work Group. Paper prepared for the'Seminar on the Initial Learning of Addition and' Subtraction. Skills (Racine, WI, November 26-29, 1979). Contains occasional light and broken type. Not available in hard copy due to copyright restrictions.. EDPS PRICE MF01 Plum Postage. PC Not Available from EDRS. DEseR.TPT00S *Addition: Behavioral Obiectives: Cognitive Oblectives: Cognitive Processes: *Elementary School Mathematics: Elementary Secondary Education: Learning Theories: Mathematical Concepts: Mathematics Curriculum: *Mathematics Education: *Mathematics Instruction: Number Concepts: *Subtraction: Teaching Methods IDENTIFIERS *Mathematics Education ResearCh: *Number 4 Operations ABSTRACT This-report opens by asking how operations in general, and addition and subtraction in particular, ante characterized for 'elementary school students, and examines the "standard" Instruction of these topics through secondary. schooling. Some common errors and/or "sloppiness" in the typical textbook presentations are noted, and suggestions are made that these probleks could lend to pupil difficulties in understanding mathematics. The ambiguity of interpretation .of number sentences of the VW's "a+b=c". and "a-b=c" leads into a comparison of the familiar use of binary operations with a unary-operator interpretation of such sentences. The second half of this document focuses on points of vier that promote .varying approaches to the development of mathematical skills and abilities within young children.
    [Show full text]
  • Hyperoperations and Nopt Structures
    Hyperoperations and Nopt Structures Alister Wilson Abstract (Beta version) The concept of formal power towers by analogy to formal power series is introduced. Bracketing patterns for combining hyperoperations are pictured. Nopt structures are introduced by reference to Nept structures. Briefly speaking, Nept structures are a notation that help picturing the seed(m)-Ackermann number sequence by reference to exponential function and multitudinous nestings thereof. A systematic structure is observed and described. Keywords: Large numbers, formal power towers, Nopt structures. 1 Contents i Acknowledgements 3 ii List of Figures and Tables 3 I Introduction 4 II Philosophical Considerations 5 III Bracketing patterns and hyperoperations 8 3.1 Some Examples 8 3.2 Top-down versus bottom-up 9 3.3 Bracketing patterns and binary operations 10 3.4 Bracketing patterns with exponentiation and tetration 12 3.5 Bracketing and 4 consecutive hyperoperations 15 3.6 A quick look at the start of the Grzegorczyk hierarchy 17 3.7 Reconsidering top-down and bottom-up 18 IV Nopt Structures 20 4.1 Introduction to Nept and Nopt structures 20 4.2 Defining Nopts from Nepts 21 4.3 Seed Values: “n” and “theta ) n” 24 4.4 A method for generating Nopt structures 25 4.5 Magnitude inequalities inside Nopt structures 32 V Applying Nopt Structures 33 5.1 The gi-sequence and g-subscript towers 33 5.2 Nopt structures and Conway chained arrows 35 VI Glossary 39 VII Further Reading and Weblinks 42 2 i Acknowledgements I’d like to express my gratitude to Wikipedia for supplying an enormous range of high quality mathematics articles.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Doing and Undoing' Applied to the Action of Exchange Reveals
    mathematics Article How the Theme of ‘Doing and Undoing’ Applied to the Action of Exchange Reveals Overlooked Core Ideas in School Mathematics John Mason 1,2 1 Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Open University, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UK; [email protected] 2 Department of Education, University of Oxford, 15 Norham Gardens, Oxford OX2 6PY, UK Abstract: The theme of ‘undoing a doing’ is applied to the ubiquitous action of exchange, showing how exchange pervades a school’s mathematics curriculum. It is possible that many obstacles encountered in school mathematics arise from an impoverished sense of exchange, for learners and possibly for teachers. The approach is phenomenological, in that the reader is urged to undertake the tasks themselves, so that the pedagogical and mathematical comments, and elaborations, may connect directly to immediate experience. Keywords: doing and undoing; exchange; substitution 1. Introduction Arithmetic is seen here as the study of actions (usually by numbers) on numbers, whereas calculation is an epiphenomenon: useful as a skill, but only to facilitate recognition Citation: Mason, J. How the Theme of relationships between numbers. Particular relationships may, upon articulation and of ‘Doing and Undoing’ Applied to analysis (generalisation), turn out to be properties that hold more generally. This way of the Action of Exchange Reveals thinking sets the scene for the pervasive mathematical theme of inverse, also known as Overlooked Core Ideas in School doing and undoing (Gardiner [1,2]; Mason [3]; SMP [4]). Exploiting this theme brings to Mathematics. Mathematics 2021, 9, the surface core ideas, such as exchange, which, although appearing sporadically in most 1530.
    [Show full text]
  • Bitwise Operators
    Logical operations ANDORNOTXORAND,OR,NOT,XOR •Loggpical operations are the o perations that have its result as a true or false. • The logical operations can be: • Unary operations that has only one operand (NOT) • ex. NOT operand • Binary operations that has two operands (AND,OR,XOR) • ex. operand 1 AND operand 2 operand 1 OR operand 2 operand 1 XOR operand 2 1 Dr.AbuArqoub Logical operations ANDORNOTXORAND,OR,NOT,XOR • Operands of logical operations can be: - operands that have values true or false - operands that have binary digits 0 or 1. (in this case the operations called bitwise operations). • In computer programming ,a bitwise operation operates on one or two bit patterns or binary numerals at the level of their individual bits. 2 Dr.AbuArqoub Truth tables • The following tables (truth tables ) that shows the result of logical operations that operates on values true, false. x y Z=x AND y x y Z=x OR y F F F F F F F T F F T T T F F T F T T T T T T T x y Z=x XOR y x NOT X F F F F T F T T T F T F T T T F 3 Dr.AbuArqoub Bitwise Operations • In computer programming ,a bitwise operation operates on one or two bit patterns or binary numerals at the level of their individual bits. • Bitwise operators • NOT • The bitwise NOT, or complement, is an unary operation that performs logical negation on each bit, forming the ones' complement of the given binary value.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Algebraic Structures
    Notes on Algebraic Structures Peter J. Cameron ii Preface These are the notes of the second-year course Algebraic Structures I at Queen Mary, University of London, as I taught it in the second semester 2005–2006. After a short introductory chapter consisting mainly of reminders about such topics as functions, equivalence relations, matrices, polynomials and permuta- tions, the notes fall into two chapters, dealing with rings and groups respec- tively. I have chosen this order because everybody is familiar with the ring of integers and can appreciate what we are trying to do when we generalise its prop- erties; there is no well-known group to play the same role. Fairly large parts of the two chapters (subrings/subgroups, homomorphisms, ideals/normal subgroups, Isomorphism Theorems) run parallel to each other, so the results on groups serve as revision for the results on rings. Towards the end, the two topics diverge. In ring theory, we study factorisation in integral domains, and apply it to the con- struction of fields; in group theory we prove Cayley’s Theorem and look at some small groups. The set text for the course is my own book Introduction to Algebra, Ox- ford University Press. I have refrained from reading the book while teaching the course, preferring to have another go at writing out this material. According to the learning outcomes for the course, a studing passing the course is expected to be able to do the following: • Give the following. Definitions of binary operations, associative, commuta- tive, identity element, inverses, cancellation. Proofs of uniqueness of iden- tity element, and of inverse.
    [Show full text]
  • Episode 7.03 – Coding Bitwise Operations
    Episode 7.03 – Coding Bitwise Operations Welcome to the Geek Author series on Computer Organization and Design Fundamentals. I’m David Tarnoff, and in this series, we are working our way through the topics of Computer Organization, Computer Architecture, Digital Design, and Embedded System Design. If you’re interested in the inner workings of a computer, then you’re in the right place. The only background you’ll need for this series is an understanding of integer math, and if possible, a little experience with a programming language such as Java. And one more thing. This episode has direct consequences for our code. You can find coding examples on the episode worksheet, a link to which can be found on the transcript page at intermation.com. Way back in Episode 2.2 – Unsigned Binary Conversion, we introduced three operators that allow us to manipulate integers at the bit level: the logical shift left (represented with two adjacent less-than operators, <<), the arithmetic shift right (represented with two adjacent greater-than operators, >>), and the logical shift right (represented with three adjacent greater-than operators, >>>). These special operators allow us to take all of the bits in a binary integer and move them left or right by a specified number of bit positions. The syntax of all three of these operators is to place the integer we wish to shift on the left side of the operator and the number of bits we wish to shift it by on the right side of the operator. In that episode, we introduced these operators to show how bit shifts could take the place of multiplication or division by powers of two.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 Sets, Combinatorics, and Probability Section
    Chapter 4 Sets, Combinatorics, and Probability Section 4.1: Sets CS 130 – Discrete Structures Set Theory • A set is a collection of elements or objects, and an element is a member of a set – Traditionally, sets are described by capital letters, and elements by lower case letters • The symbol means belongs to: – Used to represent the fact that an element belongs to a particular set. – aA means that element a belongs to set A – bA implies that b is not an element of A • Braces {} are used to indicate a set • Example: A = {2, 4, 6, 8, 10} – 3A and 2A CS 130 – Discrete Structures 2 Continue on Sets • Ordering is not imposed on the set elements and listing elements twice or more is redundant • Two sets are equal if and only if they contain the same elements – A = B means (x)[(xA xB) Λ (xB xA)] • Finite and infinite set: described by number of elements – Members of infinite sets cannot be listed but a pattern for listing elements could be indicated CS 130 – Discrete Structures 3 Various Ways To Describe A Set • The set S of all positive even integers: – List (or partially list) its elements: • S = {2, 4, 6, 8, …} – Use recursion to describe how to generate the set elements: • 2 S, if n S, then (n+2) S – Describe a property P that characterizes the set elements • in words: S = {x | x is a positive even integer} • Use predicates: S = {x P(x)} means (x)[(xS P(x)) Λ (P(x) xS)] where P is the unary predicate.
    [Show full text]
  • Prolog Experiments in Discrete Mathematics, Logic, and Computability
    Prolog Experiments in Discrete Mathematics, Logic, and Computability James L. Hein Portland State University March 2009 Copyright © 2009 by James L. Hein. All rights reserved. Contents Preface.............................................................................................................. 4 1 Introduction to Prolog................................................................................... 5 1.1 Getting Started................................................................................ 5 1.2 An Introductory Example................................................................. 6 1.3 Some Programming Tools ............................................................... 9 2 Beginning Experiments................................................................................ 12 2.1 Variables, Predicates, and Clauses................................................ 12 2.2 Equality, Unification, and Computation ........................................ 16 2.3 Numeric Computations ................................................................... 19 2.4 Type Checking.................................................................................. 20 2.5 Family Trees .................................................................................... 21 2.6 Interactive Reading and Writing..................................................... 23 2.7 Adding New Clauses........................................................................ 25 2.8 Modifying Clauses ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Java Compound Assignment Operators
    Java Compound Assignment Operators Energising and loutish Harland overbuy, but Sid grimly masturbate her bever. Bilobate Bjorn sometimes fleets his taxman agnatically and pugs so forthwith! Herding Darryl always cautions his eucalyptuses if Tuckie is wordless or actualized slap-bang. Peter cao is? 1525 Assignment Operators. This program produces a deeper understanding, simple data type expressions have already been evaluated. In ALGOL and Pascal the assignment operator is a colon if an equals sign enhance the equality operator is young single equals In C the assignment operator is he single equals sign flex the equality operator is a retention of equals signs. Does assign mean that in mouth i j is a shortcut for something antique this i summary of playing i j java casting operators variable-assignment assignment. However ask is not special case compound assignment operators automatically cast. The arithmetic operators with even simple assignment operator to read compound. Why bug us see about how strings a target object reference to comment or registered. There are operators java does not supported by. These cases where arithmetic, if we perform a certain number of integers from left side operand is evaluated before all classes. Free Pascal Needs Sc command line while Go Java JavaScript Kotlin Objective-C Perl PHP Python Ruby Rust Scala SystemVerilog. Operator is class type integer variable would you have used. Compound assignment operators IBM Knowledge Center. The 2 is it example of big compound assignment operator which. To him listening to take one, you want to true or equal to analyze works of an integer data to store values.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Image Processing and Analysis Laboratory 1: Operations on Images
    Digital image processing and analysis Laboratory 1: Operations on images Vedrana Baliceviˇ c,´ Pavle Prentasiˇ c´ 2014. 1.1 Unary operations on the image Unary operations on the image are mathematical operations whose input is a pixel intensity value, and the output is a changed intensity value of the same pixel. The operation is performed for all of the pixels in the image, meaning that an unary operator produces an image for each given input image. A scheme of an unary operation is given with Fig.1.1. Figure 1.1: Unary image operations scheme Unary operation can be any mathematical function that changes the intensity values of the pixels in an image. Codomain of the function does not have to be equal to its domain. Therefore, if we want to obtain a meaningful display of an image after performing an unary operation on it, the resulting image will need to be rescaled. Images whose pixel values are given with a class double should be scaled to the interval [0;1], whereas the images whose pixel values are given with a class integer should be scaled to the interval [1;255]. MATLAB function imagesc() does an automatic scaling to the required interval and displays it. An example >> [img, map] = imread(’medalja_kamenita_vrata.png’); >> img = double(img); % most of the functions require input arguments of a class double >> imgU = sqrt(img); % performing an unary operation >> max(imgU(:)) % display the maximal value ans = 15.9687 % maximal value is not 255 anymore >> imagesc(imgU) % scale and display the image simultaneously >> colormap(gray) % change the color palette 1 1.1.1 Problems 1.
    [Show full text]
  • A Binary Operation on a Set S Is an Operation That Takes Two Elements of S As Input and Produces One Element of S As Output
    Definitions! • A binary operation on a set S is an operation that takes two elements of S as input and produces one element of S as output. • A set S is closed under an operation if whenever the inputs to the operation come from S, the output of the operation is in S too. ◦ [Note that in order for an operation to qualify as a binary operation on a set under the first definition above, the set must be closed under the operation, because the definition of binary operation requires that the output of the operation be in the set. If the set isn't even closed under the operation, then the operation does not qualify as a binary operation on the set, and none of the following definitions apply.] • A binary operation ? on a set S is commutative if a ? b = b ? a for all elements a and b in S. • A binary operation ? on a set S is associative if (a ? b) ? c = a ? (b ? c) for all elements a, b, and c in S. • Let S be a set with a binary operation ?. An element e in S is an identity element (or just an identity) if e ? a = a and a ? e = a for every element a in S. • Let S be a set with a binary operation ? and an identity element e. ◦ Let a be an element in S. If there exists an element b in S such that a ? b = e and b ? a = e, then the element a is invertible, and b is an inverse of a.
    [Show full text]
  • Linear Algebra I Skills, Concepts and Applications
    Linear Algebra I Skills, Concepts and Applications Gregg Waterman Oregon Institute of Technology c 2016 Gregg Waterman This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. The essence of the license is that You are free to: Share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format • Adapt - remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. • The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms: Attribution - You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes • were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. No additional restrictions - You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits. Notices: You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation. No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material. For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work. The best way to do this is with a link to the web page below. To view a full copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.
    [Show full text]