Review: Jay Berkovitz’S”Rites

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Review: Jay Berkovitz’S”Rites New Book on R. Saul Wahl, King of Poland for a Day Dr. Neil Rosenstein, who has already published some rather important works on Jewish genealogy generally, as well as on R. Elijah Gaon of Vilna, has published a new book, devoted to R. Saul (Wahl) Katzenellenbogen. His earlier two-volume landmark work, The Unbroken Chain: Biographical Sketches and Genealogy of Illustrious Jewish Families from the 15th-20th Century, lists in great detail, the descendants of R. Saul (Wahl) Katzenellenbogen. R. Saul is best known for the legend that he became king for a day over Poland. The story goes that that after the Polish king died, the nobles were unable to come to an agreement who would replace him. The law, however, mandated that there not be a day go by without a king in place. The nobles decided to temporarily grant R. Saul Wahl the kingship until they could come to a consensus. In the end, R. Saul Wahl remained king for one day and during that time enacted various law for the benefit of the Jews. Dr. Rosenstein, has now collected in English for the first time, just about everything there is about this legend and more generally about Saul Wahl (including Saul Wahl’s library). He uncovered a document which has bearing on the dating of Saul Wahl’s death date as well as much other primary material. Additionally, he includes an extensive discussion about how this legend developed, as well as an article (by Professor S. A. Bershadsky) about Saul Wahl, as recorded in Polish and Russian literature. As Dr. Rosenstein is an expert in Jewish Genealogy and on the Katzenellenbogen family, he includes an extensive genealogy of Saul Wahl and his family. The book also includes about the history of the some of the figures involved in the Saul Wahl king story as well as more general history of the time. Most everything in the book includes photocopies of either the relevant documents or materials. While the book contains much fascinating material on Saul Wahl, I think that it is worthwhile to make note of a few things that Dr. Rosenstein was apparently unaware of their existence. Dr. Rosenstein notes the first mention of Saul Wahl being king, there were prior mentions of Saul Wahl and his standing, but not the king legend – and Rosenstein includes these earlier mentions as well – appears in the work Yesh M’Nechalin (previously touched upon at the Seforim blog here) authored by R. Pinchas Katzenellenbogen (no. 53-55), a descendant of Saul Wahl. But, Rosenstein appears to be unaware that this book is actually published; he notes that it remains in manuscript form, but never notes that in fact it has been printed in 1986! While obviously there is nothing wrong with going to the source – here, the manuscript – it helps the reader to know that they can also view the details somewhere for themselves. Another omission is Dr. Rosenstein includes a discussion of the medical school in Padua but appears to be unaware that this school and its Jewish connection and graduates was discussed extensively by Prof. David Ruderman (Jewish Thought and Scientific Discovery in Early Modern Europe [Yale University, 1995], esp. pp. 100-118) and Dr. Ruderman’s discussion would enhance Dr. Rosenstein’s considerably. The book is available at Beigeleisen, as well as here. Barukh Dayan Ha-Emet. Rabbi Prof. Mordechai (ben Shamshon) Breuer (1921-2007) Barukh Dayan Ha-Emet. Rabbi Prof. Mordechai (ben Shamshon) Breuer (also here), scion of the prominent German rabbinical family and world expert on Tanakh and on the Aleppo Codex, has passed away in Yerushalayim. (He was a cousin to the noted Jewish Historian, who shares his same name.) An appreciation to Rabbi Breuer and his work appeared in the Orthodox Forum volume, Modern Scholarship in the Study of Torah: Contributions and Limitations (Jason Aronson, 1996), a project of Yeshiva University. He received the Israel Prize for Torah Studies in 1999. Hamakom yenacheim etchem betoch shaar avelei tziyon v’yerushalayim. Adam Mintz — Rabbi Yosef Eliyahu Henkin: A Forgotten American Posek Rabbi Adam Mintz is a visiting professor of Jewish History at Queens College and the immediate past president of the New York Board of Rabbis. He lectures widely on a variety of topics in Jewish History and his weekly streaming video entitled “This Week in Jewish History” is featured on the internet at www.rayimahuvim.org. Rabbi Mintz served in the pulpit rabbinate for over twenty years and is one of the founders of Kehilat Rayim Ahuvim on the Upper West Side of Manhattan. He has recently published a book entitled Jewish Spirituality and Divine Law (Ktav, 2005) and is completing his dissertation “The Evolution of the American Orthodox Community: The History of the Communal Eruv” (New York University, forthcoming). Rabbi Mintz serves on the advisory committee of Sh’ma and is a member of the Board of Directors of The Orthodox Caucus, Kehilat Rayim Ahuvim and Plaza Memorial Chapel. The post below on Rabbi Yosef Eliyahu Henkin was previously delivered as part of his lecture series “History of American Poskim.” We hope that Rabbi Mintz will contribute several posts, based on this fantastic series, to the Seforim blog. –Dan Rabinowitz Rabbi Yosef Eliyahu Henkin: A Forgotten American Posek by Adam Mintz Rabbi Yosef Eliyahu Henkin died in his apartment on the Lower East Side of Manhattan on Shabbat Nachamu, August 12, 1973. Rabbi Moshe Feinstein and Rabbi Yaakov Kaminetzky delivered eulogies at his funeral and Rabbi Joseph B. Soloveitchik attended the funeral but did not speak. Rabbi Henkin was born in White Russia in 1881. He studied, primarily, in the yeshiva in Slutzk and spent ten years as a rabbi and rosh yeshiva in Georgia on the Black Sea. Rabbi Henkin emigrated to America in 1923 and was appointed the rabbi of Congregation Anshei Shtutsen on the Lower East Side. In 1925, he became secretary and then director of Ezras Torah, a rabbinic organization founded in 1915 to assist Torah scholars imperiled by the turmoil of World War I. The organization was later expanded to assist rabbis and their students who attempted to flee Europe during the dark years surrounding World War II. Rabbi Henkin remained at the helm of Ezras Torah for the next forty-eight years. He served as a posek for rabbis and laymen throughout America and wrote numerous articles for a variety of Torah journals. Many of his essays and teshuvot are reprinted in a two-volume work entitled Kitvei ha-Gaon Rabbi Yosef Eliyahu Henkin (New York, 1980). In spite of Rabbi Henkin’s illustrious rabbinic career, we live today amidst a Torah and scholarly community “who knew not Yosef.” When poskim from the Lower East Side are considered, it is Rabbi Feinstein whose name and works are still authoritative twenty years after his passing. Yet, the first volume of Iggerot Moshe was published in 1959, when Rabbi Henkin was almost 80 years old and had spent a lifetime answering rabbinic questions and recording them for others. The reasons for the popularity of a posek depend on the culture of the contemporary Orthodox community as much as on the quality of the p’sak. Rabbi Feinstein lived for thirteen years after Rabbi Henkin’s passing. Those years, from 1973-1986, were critical years in the growth of the Torah community of America. Many of Rabbi Feinstein’s teshuvot date from that period and many more teshuvot became known during the last years of his life. Most of Rabbi Henkin’s teshuvot date to an era when interest in the intricate questions of halakhah in America was limited to the scholarly rabbis of the time. Yet, these teshuvot remain relevant for all students of halakhah and of the history of American Orthodoxy. The richness and originality of those teshuvot give us insight into the challenges of that generation of American Orthodoxy and into the pivotal role played by Rabbi Henkin during this period. I would like to address three issues in which Rabbi Henkin and Rabbi Feinstein reached different halakhic conclusions concerning areas of grave importance to American Orthodoxy. 1. The Mehitzah While Orthodox leaders have always defined mixed seating in synagogue as the great divide between the Orthodox and the non-Orthodox, the 1950’s and 1960’s saw a growing number of Orthodox synagogues which introduced mixed seating. One source claims that in 1961 there existed “perhaps 250 Orthodox synagogues where family seating is practiced.” While it is difficult to verify the accuracy of this report, it is certain that rabbis serving in mixed-seating synagogues continued to belong to the Rabbinical Council of America without fear of expulsion.[1] The tide began to turn in the late 1950’s as many Orthodox leaders declared their opposition to congregations with mixed-seating. A major step in this direction was introduced by Baruch Litvin, a businessman who belonged to Beth Tefilas Moshe, an Orthodox congregation in Mt. Clemens, Michigan which voted to introduce mixed-seating in 1955. Litvin took up the battle against this ruling based on an established American legal principle that a religious congregation cannot introduce a practice opposed to the doctrine of the congregation against the wishes of even a minority of the congregation. His attorneys, supported by the Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations of America (OU), introduced a significant amount of evidence to support the claim that mixed-seating was “clearly violative of the established Orthodox Jewish law and practice.” The lower courts sided with the congregation and refused to become involved. However, the Michigan Supreme Court unanimously reversed the decision and accepted the minority’s claim.[2] Litvin gathered the evidence that he had collected and published it, in 1962, in a volume entitled The Sanctity of the Synagogue.
Recommended publications
  • Shabbos Shorts May 22 - 23, 2020 - 29 Iyar 5780 - Parshas Bamidbar/Mevorchim Hachodesh Light Candles by 8:02 - Havdalah 9:09
    Young Israel Shomrai Emunah - Shabbos Shorts May 22 - 23, 2020 - 29 Iyar 5780 - Parshas Bamidbar/Mevorchim Hachodesh Light Candles by 8:02 - Havdalah 9:09 Mazal Tov Weekday Shiurim • Howard & Rosanne Benn on the Bar Mitzvah of their grandson, Tzvi Options for remote learning are listed below. For the latest list, go Hirsch Lipman, of Beitar Illit, Israel. Mazal Tov to parents Miriam to https://wp.yise.org/remote-learning-schedule/ (Michelle Benn) & Rabbi Dovid Lipman and grandparents Karen & • Rabbi Rosenbaum - Daily - one chapter of Tehillim followed Bernie Lipman of Woodside. by a 15-minute Shiur on the Parsha. Sunday 9:00 AM/Monday • Shulie & Ronnie Bergman on the birth of a grandson, Shmuel, born to through Friday 8:30 AM - Zoom A. their children, Nechama & Noach Bergman. Mazal Tov to big brother • Rabbi Rosenbaum - Daily - one chapter of Tehillim, Moshe and big sister Miriam. followed by a 15-minute Halacha Shiur. Sunday through Thursday, 7:30 PM - Zoom A. • Manasseh Katz for taking 2nd place in the Table Topics Impromptu • Rabbi Rosenbaum’s Mussar Study Group for Women Speech Contest for Toastmasters International District 36, comprised of (spiritual self-improvement), Sundays at 9:30 AM, Zoom A. over 200 clubs and 5,000 members in Maryland, DC and Virginia. • Rabbi Rosenbaum’s Gemara Shiur for Men, Tuesdays and • Becca & Brett Kugler on the virtual Bar Mitzvah of their son, Akiva. Fridays, 6:00 AM, Zoom A. Mazal Tov to the entire family. • Rabbi Rosenbaum’s Nach Shiur, Wednesdays at 11:00 AM, • Marion & Fred Miller on the graduation of their daughter, Adena, from Zoom A.
    [Show full text]
  • Akedah, Art, and Illustrations in Hebrew Books
    Akedah, Art, and Illustrations in Hebrew Books The Akedah (binding of Isaac) is a very popular theme in the arts. It appears in music, most recently (from a decidedly Christian perspective), the critically acclaimed indie musician Sufjan Steven’s who has the songAbraham (on his Seven Swans CD). In the visual arts, numerous representations of the Akedah can be found, from Rembrandt to Chagall. Some of the earliest Jewish art also contains the Akedah. In both the Dura_Europos Synagogue and the Beth-Alpha Synagogue there are depictions of the Akedah. This trend was continued in Hebrew manuscripts throughout the Middle Ages. In Hebrew books, however, there is a dearth of illustrations generally. At most in Haggadot or on title pages, at times, there are minor illustrations. But, there is a notable exception. In 1685, the work Pachad Yitzhak was published in Amsterdam. This book, written by Rabbi Dr. Isaac Vita (or Hayyim) Cantarini (see note 1), is about the attack on the Jewish ghetto of Padua in 1684. Preceding the title page there is an elaborate illustration of the Akedah. The simple reason for the inclusion of this is due to Cantarini’s first name Isaac and thus an allusion to his name. But, as we will see, there is more to this illustration. In his later work Et Kets, also published in Amsterdam in 1710 he includes another depiction of the Akedah. This work is devoted to figuring out when the Messiah will come, (he thinks in 1740), a much more upbeat topic than his prior work. As you can see both illustrations, it bears discussing them in some detail.
    [Show full text]
  • Another Case of Historical Censorship at Volozhin Or Simply Poor Research?
    Another Case of Historical Censorship at Volozhin or Simply Poor Research? One of the more important sources for the history relating to the famed Volozhin Yeshiva is Moshe Shmuel v’Doro, by R. Moshe Shmuel Shapiro (Shmukler), which is is full of important material on this yeshiva and the related personalities. R. Schapiro also published a monograph on the founder of the Yeshiva, R. Chaim of Volozhin. This work, Toldot Rabbenu Chaim Volozhin, was first published in 1909 in Vilna, republished a year later in Vilna and then published twice in Israel, once in Bnei Brak in 1957 and once in Jerusalem in 1968. Recently, in 2000, Toldot Rabbenu Chaim Volozhin, was republished by R. Schapiro’s descendants. In the 2000 edition of Toldot Rabbenu Chaim Volozhin, R. Schapiro’s descendants include a brief introduction about the history of the book, yet they were unaware of some key facts. First, they claim the book was only published twice, when in fact it was published four times. Additionally, then erroneously note that their edition is the third when in fact it is the fifth. Finally, they claim the first edition was the 1910 edition, when in fact the first edition appeared in 1909. In addition to these three inaccuracies and omissions, there is a much more glaring one; not bibliographical in the abstract, but related to the content of the book – they have left out something which appeared in the earlier editions. In the first (1909) edition, a letter from R. Dr. Abraham Eliyahu Harkavy (1839-1919), a former student at the yeshiva in Volozhin, appears which contains both his warm approval of the book as well as a few comments on the book.
    [Show full text]
  • Bal Tashchit : the Jewish Prohibition Against Needless Destruction Wolff, K.A
    Bal Tashchit : the Jewish prohibition against needless destruction Wolff, K.A. Citation Wolff, K. A. (2009, December 1). Bal Tashchit : the Jewish prohibition against needless destruction. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/1887/14448 Version: Corrected Publisher’s Version Licence agreement concerning inclusion of doctoral thesis in the License: Institutional Repository of the University of Leiden Downloaded from: https://hdl.handle.net/1887/14448 Note: To cite this publication please use the final published version (if applicable). BAL TASHCHIT: THE JEWISH PROHIBITION AGAINST NEEDLESS DESTRUCTION Copyright © 2009 by K. A. Wolff All rights reserved Printed in Jerusalem BAL TASHCHIT: THE JEWISH PROHIBITION AGAINST NEEDLESS DESTRUCTION Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van Doctor aan de Universiteit Leiden, op gezag van de Rector Magnificus prof. mr P.F. van der Heijden, volgens besluit van het College voor Promoties te verdedigen op dinsdag 1 december 2009 klokke 15:00 uur door Keith A. Wolff geboren te Fort Lauderdale (Verenigde Staten) in 1957 Promotiecommissie Promotores: Prof. Dr F.A. de Wolff Prof. Dr A. Wijler, Rabbijn, Jerusalem College of Technology Overige leden: Prof. Dr J.J. Boersema, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Prof. Dr A. Ellian Prof. Dr R.W. Munk, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Prof. Dr I.E. Zwiep, Universiteit van Amsterdam To my wife, our children, and our parents Preface This is an interdisciplinary thesis. The second and third chapters focus on classic Jewish texts, commentary and legal responsa, including the original Hebrew and Aramaic, along with translations into English. The remainder of the thesis seeks to integrate principles derived from these Jewish sources with contemporary Western thought, particularly on what might be called 'environmental' themes.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Catalogue
    F i n e J u d a i C a . printed booKs, manusCripts, Ceremonial obJeCts & GraphiC art K e s t e n b au m & C om pa n y thursday, nov ember 19th, 2015 K est e n bau m & C o m pa ny . Auctioneers of Rare Books, Manuscripts and Fine Art A Lot 61 Catalogue of F i n e J u d a i C a . BOOK S, MANUSCRIPTS, GR APHIC & CEREMONIAL A RT INCLUDING A SINGULAR COLLECTION OF EARLY PRINTED HEBREW BOOK S, BIBLICAL & R AbbINIC M ANUSCRIPTS (PART II) Sold by order of the Execution Office, District High Court, Tel Aviv ——— To be Offered for Sale by Auction, Thursday, 19th November, 2015 at 3:00 pm precisely ——— Viewing Beforehand: Sunday, 15th November - 12:00 pm - 6:00 pm Monday, 16th November - 10:00 am - 6:00 pm Tuesday, 17th November - 10:00 am - 6:00 pm Wednesday, 18th November - 10:00 am - 6:00 pm No Viewing on the Day of Sale This Sale may be referred to as: “Sempo” Sale Number Sixty Six Illustrated Catalogues: $38 (US) * $45 (Overseas) KestenbauM & CoMpAny Auctioneers of Rare Books, Manuscripts and Fine Art . 242 West 30th street, 12th Floor, new york, NY 10001 • tel: 212 366-1197 • Fax: 212 366-1368 e-mail: [email protected] • World Wide Web site: www.Kestenbaum.net K est e n bau m & C o m pa ny . Chairman: Daniel E. Kestenbaum Operations Manager: Jackie S. Insel Client Relations: Sandra E. Rapoport, Esq. Printed Books & Manuscripts: Rabbi Eliezer Katzman Rabbi Dovid Kamenetsky (Consultant) Ceremonial & Graphic Art: Abigail H.
    [Show full text]
  • HAMAOR Rosh Hashanah 5779 / September 2018 HAMAOR 5 זכרתי לך חסד נעורייך
    ROSH HASHANAH 5779 SEPTEMBER 2018 Gateshead’s Master of Technology A Prole of Mr Dovid Gurwicz osh Hashanah Through the Age Signicant Roshei Hashanah from the 10th to the 17th centuries זכרתי לך חסד נעורייך Shofar Rabbi Gershon Miller speaks out on helping today’s youth build strong Mesiras Nefesh and Mesoroh relationships with Hashem SWEEPING AWAY STIGMA Parenting a child with serious mental health challenges זכרתי לך חסד נעורייך 4 Helping today’s youth to build strong relationships with Hashem 9 Shofar Mesiras Nefesh and Mesoroh 20 Rosh Hashanah: A New Day Thoughts for Yom Tov from Rabbi Yaacov Haber shlita he theme of resilience is one that is repeated throughout this 23 Rosh Hashanah edition of Hamaor. In Rabbi Gershon Miller’s Rosh Hashanah Through the Ages Significant Roshei Hashanah from the 10th to the thoughtful op-ed, he speaks of the terrible consequences of a 17th centuries Tlack of resilience in today’s young people. Indeed, as you will read 30 in my own article, ‘Sweeping Away Stigma’, this absence is having a Yom Kippur: The Chinuch of Kedushoh devastating effect on the mental health of many adolescents in our and Perishus Achieving Taharoh on the Day of Atonement kehillos today. 32 Gateshead’s Master of Technology Resilience, which is defined as the capacity to recover quickly A Profile of Mr Dovid Gurwicz from difficulties, is a trait that has stood our people in good stead 40 throughout history, however. In one of the vignettes in Rabbi Aubrey Mishpot V’tzedek Supporting you Practical Financial Shailos Hersh’s article on Roshei Hashanah of the past, we learn of the humble 47 origins of the world’s largest Jewish population, in New York – a prime The Other Side of the Coin A look behind the scenes at MaaserText’s inner example of Jewish resilience if ever there was one.
    [Show full text]
  • Sabbateans - Wikipedia
    Sabbateans - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sabbateans Sabbateans The Sabbateans (or Sabbatians) were a variety of Jewish followers, disciples, and believers in Sabbatai Zevi (1626–1676), [1][2][3] a Sephardic Jewish rabbi and Kabbalist who was proclaimed to be the Jewish Messiah in 1666 by Nathan of Gaza.[1][2] Vast numbers of Jews in the Jewish diaspora accepted his claims, even after he outwardly became an apostate due to his forced conversion to Islam in the same year.[1][2][3] Sabbatai Zevi's followers, both during his proclaimed messiahship and after his forced conversion to Islam, are known as Sabbateans.[1][3] Part of the Sabbateans lived on until well into 21st-century Turkey as descendants of the Dönmeh.[1] Contents Sabbatai Zevi Conversion to Islam Sabbatean-related controversies in Jewish history The Emden-Eybeschutz controversy Sabbateans and early Hasidism Sabbateans and modern secularism Rabbis who opposed the Sabbateans See also References Further reading Sabbatai Zevi Sabbatai Zevi was a Sephardic ordained rabbi from Smyrna (now İzmir, Turkey).[4][5] A kabbalist of Romaniote origin,[6] Zevi, who was active throughout the Ottoman Empire, claimed to be the long- awaited Jewish Messiah. He was the founder of the Sabbatean movement, whose followers subsequently were to be known as Dönmeh "converts" or crypto-Jews.[7] Conversion to Islam In February 1666, upon arriving in Constantinople, Sabbatai was imprisoned on the order of the grand vizier Köprülüzade Fazıl Ahmed Pasha; in September of that same year, after being moved from different prisons around the capital to Adrianople (the imperial court's seat) for judgment on accusations of fomenting sedition, Sabbatai was given by the Grand Vizier, in the name of the Sultan of the Ottoman Empire, Mehmed IV, the choice of either facing death by some type of ordeal, or of converting to Islam.
    [Show full text]
  • TORAH WEEKLY 5 - 11 May, 2019 Parshat Kedoshim Whether You Believe Darkness out There Too
    בס״ד TORAH WEEKLY 5 ‑ 11 May, 2019 Parshat Kedoshim Whether you believe darkness out there too. And if 30 Nissan ‑ SPIRITUAL VS. that those who practice spi‑ we are not dealing with Jewi‑ 6 Iyar, 5779 HOLY ritualism are indeed making sh prophets of old or bona fide Torah: In a Parshah whe‑ contact or not, makes little holy mystics, we may, G‑d Leviticus 19:1 ‑ 20:27 re we read the golden rule difference from the Jewish forbid, get burned. And, who of Love Thy Neighbor as perspective. Imaginary or knows if our connections are Haftorah: Thyself and numerous other real, the Torah forbids it. Even not seen as interference. We Ezekiel 20:2‑20 “social” mitzvot, I find it ne‑ if it is real that doesn’t mean may well be guilty of distur‑ cessary to focus on another of it isright. Not everything that bing the dead, in which case can be done ought to be done. we might actually be doing CALENDARS our Parshah’s commandmen‑ Most people seem more harm than good. We have Jewish ts—one which in our own day to be confused by this. They My brother‑in‑law, Calendars, if you would seems to have been forgotten, much to our own detriment, I become convinced that if it Rabbi Shabsi Alpern, is the like one, please send us fear. really is able to happen then Chabad shliach in Brazil. a letter and we will send Under the general this legitimizes it. Often, Many such practices occur you one, or ask the Rab‑ command to “Be Holy” it is those who have been in his community.
    [Show full text]
  • Halakhic Responses to Artificial Intelligence and Autonomous Machines
    בס"ד Rabbi Daniel Nevins CJLS HM 182.1.2019 Approved, June 19, 2019 (18‐0‐0). Voting in favor: Rabbis Pamela Barmash, Elliot Dorff, Baruch Frydman Kohl, Susan Grossman, Judith Hauptman, Joshua Heller, Jeremy Kalmanofsky, Steve Kane, Jan Kaufman, Gail Labovitz, Amy Levin, Daniel Nevins, Micah Peltz, Robert Scheinberg, Deborah Silver, Ariel Stofenmacher, Iscah Waldman, Ellen Wolintz Fields. Halakhic Responses to Artificial Intelligence and Autonomous Machines Question: With rapid advances in the development of artificial intelligence and autonomous machines have come calls for “moral machines” that integrate ethical considerations into analysis and action. What halakhic principles should apply to the conduct of such machines? Specifically: 1. Are Jews liable for the halakhic consequences of actions taken by machines on their behalf, for example, Sabbath labor? 2. Should ethical principles derived from halakhah be integrated into the development of autonomous systems for transportation, medical care, warfare and other morally charged activities, allowing autonomous systems to make life or death decisions? 3. Might a robot perform a mitzvah or other halakhically significant action? Is it conceivable to treat an artificial agent as a person? As a Jew? Response: I. The Rise of Artificial Intelligence and the Call for Machine Ethics Among the extraordinary developments of our digital age, perhaps none is as startling as the introduction of smart machines that function without direct human supervision, in an open and dynamic environment, with the possibility of significant and even lethal consequences for people. An academic field of machine ethics has emerged, but there is no consensus about what type of ethical system, whether rule‐based, consequentialist, or virtue, should guide the development of artificial intelligence.1 To date there has been negligible engagement by halakhic authorities in this discourse, 1 Keith Abney, “Robotics, Ethical Theory, and Metaethics: A Guide for the Perplexed,” in Patrick Lin, Keith Abney, George A.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Mortem Circumcision מילה אחר מיתה
    Post-Mortem Circumcision מילה אחר מיתה Baruch Frydman-Kohl YD 263:5 This teshuvah was approved unanimously (16-0-0) on April 6, 2016. Voting in Favor Rabbis Pamela Barmash, Miriam Berkowitz, Noah Bickart, Elliot Dorff, Baruch Frydman-Kohl, Susan Grossman, Reuven Hammer, Joshua Heller, Jeremy Kalmanofsky, Jane Kanarek, Gail Labovitz, Amy Levin, Jonathan Lubliner, Daniel Nevins, Micah Peltz, and Jay Stein. עולם לברית בבשרכם בריתי והיתה My covenant shall be in your flesh as a sign of an eternal covenant :שאלה In the event of the tragedy of a stillbirth or the death of an infant boy, must there be a brit milah, circumcision, before burial? Many male Jews from the former Soviet Union did not have a brit milah as children and, even after emigrating, did not arrange for their circumcision. When they die, must they be circumcised before burial? In either case, if circumcision is required, would this be considered part of the regular preparation for burial or, would the surviving family have to be informed and provide explicit consent? :תשובה The core mitzvah The first mitzvah of the Torah that is particular to our people is the commandment to Avraham: וַ יֹּ֤אמֶ ר א-ֹלהִ ים אֶל־אַבְרָ הָָ֔ ם וְאַתָ ָּ֖ ה אֶ ת־בְרִ ִ֣ יתִ י מתִשְ ֹ֑ ר אַתָ ָּ֛ ה וְזַרְ עֲך א ַחֲרֶ ָּ֖ יך לְ ד ר תָ ם׃ ז ִ֣את בְרִ יתִִ֞ י ִ֣ אֲשֶ ר תִשְמְ ר֗ ּו בֵּ ינִי ּובֵּ ִ֣ינֵּיכֶָ֔ ם ּובֵּ ין זַרְ עֲךָּ֖ ֹ֑ אַחֲרֶ יך הִמול לָכֶ ָּ֖ם כָ ל־זָכָ ר׃ ּונְמַ לְתֶֶּ֕ ם אֵּ ָּ֖ ת ִ֣ בְשַ ר עָרְ לַתְכֶ ֹ֑ם וְהָ יָה לְאִ֣ ות ָ֔ בְרִ ית בֵּ ינִ ָּ֖י ּובֵּ ינֵּיכֶ ם׃ ּובֶ ן־ משְ נַ ִ֣ת יָמִ֗ ים יִמול לָכֶ ָּ֛ם כָ ל־זָכָ ָּ֖ר לְ דר תֵּ יכֶֹ֑ ם….
    [Show full text]
  • Kabbalah – Jewish Mysticism I
    Kabbalah – Jewish MysticisM I What is Kabbalah and The Prerequisites for its Study abbalah seems to be in style today, along with all sorts of Eastern spirituality, Kmysticisms, and various forms of meditation. Many people are left wondering about the authenticity of Kabbalah, about whether or not it offers a way to circumvent the strictures of adhering to a Torah lifestyle, and whether or not it is indeed a real part of the Jewish tradition. There are three Morasha shiurim on Kabbalah. This first class addresses the definition of Kabbalah, its authenticity, and the prerequisites for its study. The shiur also discusses how the revealed Torah offers tremendous depth and opportunity for personal and spiritual development without the study of Kabbalah. Finally, two books are suggested for students seeking to study introductory Kabbalah with a qualified mentor. The second and third Morasha classes explore the primary topics addressed by Kabbalah. In this class we will address the following questions: Is Kabbalah an authentic expression of Judaism? Is it a recent development or is it part of the Sinai transmission? Who were the primary teachers of Kabbalah and what texts did they write? How can one differentiate real Kabbalah from pseudo-Kabbalah? How does one become a Kabbalist? What are the prerequisites? Is it necessary to study Kabbalah to establish a connection to spirituality and enable personal development? Class Outline: Section I. Introduction: What Kabbalah Is, and What It Isn’t Section II. The Authenticity of Kabbalah Part A. A Multi-faceted Torah Part B. A Secret Tradition Part C. The Tradition Rediscovered and Verified Section III.
    [Show full text]
  • י Gratitude to Egypt?
    בס“ד Parshat Vaera 1 Shevat, 5777/January 28, 2017 Vol. 8 Num. 21 This issue of Toronto Torah is dedicated by Rochel and Jeffrey Silver נ“י in honour of the recent birthdays of Jeffrey’s parents, Leona and Label Silver Gratitude to Egypt? Yaron Perez “Tell Aharon: Take your staff, and they began to oppress and enslave us. others, and return the favour, and not extend your arm upon the waters of So why should we display gratitude? be disgusting, distant and ungrateful. Egypt, upon their rivers, upon their This is a wicked trait, entirely revolting, canals, etc.” (Shemot 7:19) Rashi We may suggest an answer. The Torah before G-d and Man.” Pharaoh exhibits explains, citing a midrash, “Because states that “a new king arose in Egypt, an extreme example of the challenge of the river protected Moshe, it was not who did not know Yosef.” (Shemot 1:8) developing a sense of gratitude, and this struck by his hand in the plagues of On this, Rashi explains that the king flaw led to his demise. We must learn to Blood and Frogs; it was struck by knew all about Yosef, but “he acted as be different. Aharon’s hand.” This is perplexing; of though he did not know Yosef.” Building what value is gratitude toward an on the same idea, a midrash (Midrash Therefore, when we express gratitude to inanimate object? HaGadol, Parshat Shemot) states, “He Egypt, benefiting the undeserving knew, but he did not look at this; he hid Egyptians is not the ultimate goal; our Devarim 23:20 adds to our confusion, [Yosef’s] benevolence, and in the end he gratitude to the inanimate river, too, is commanding, “You shall not reject the hid G-d’s benevolence.” Expanding not for the sake of the insensate river.
    [Show full text]