Piracy, Slavery, and Law in the Early Modern Ottoman Mediterranean

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Piracy, Slavery, and Law in the Early Modern Ottoman Mediterranean Catch and Release: Piracy, Slavery, and Law in the Early Modern Ottoman Mediterranean by Joshua Michael White A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (History) in the University of Michigan 2012 Doctoral Committee: Professor Rudi Paul Lindner, Chair Professor John V.A. Fine Associate Professor Gottfried J. Hagen Associate Professor Diane Owen Hughes © Joshua Michael White 2012 For my parents ii Acknowledgments From the Midwest to the Mediterranean, many individuals and institutions gave generously of their time, knowledge, and resources to make the research and writing of this dissertation possible and, occasionally, pleasurable. I am pleased to finally be able to acknowledge their contributions here. My undergraduate advisor, Ahmet T. Karamustafa, set me on this path. I will always be grateful to him for his gentle guidance and for nurturing my enthusiasm. During my graduate studies at the University of Michigan, I had the great good fortune to study with an outstanding ensemble of teacher-scholars. I thank first and foremost my dissertation committee members: Rudi Paul Lindner, Gottfried Hagen, Diane Owen Hughes, and John V.A. Fine. Back in early 2005, when I was still trying to decide where to go to graduate school, Rudi Lindner wrote to me of his own advisor, John Masson Smith, Jr.: “He taught me how to study, what to study, but he never tried to mold me after himself, and he went where I wanted to go, even down some dead end streets.” I am grateful to him for being the ideal mentor in the mold of his master—humane, patient, generous with his time, and endlessly supportive—and for allowing me go to where I wanted, even when others saw nothing but dead ends. Gottfried Hagen taught me Ottoman Turkish and much more. Through classes and extended conversations he had a profound impact on my development as a scholar. His influence has shaped every aspect of this project from iii conception to conclusion; his subtle course corrections during research, writing, and revision kept it from foundering on the rocks. I learned a great deal studying with and teaching for Diane Owen Hughes. She exposed me to ideas and approaches to history that have left a lasting impression on my thinking about research and teaching. John Fine, beyond being a master of all things Balkan and Byzantine, was a font of encouragement and kindness. I thank him for sharing his vast knowledge with me, for the many long lunches, and for believing I was on to something. Mehmet Süreyya Er introduced me to Modern Turkish. More recently, Katherine French gave me very good advice when it was most needed. Tom Green did the same, and provided valuable comments on chapters. My deep appreciation goes to the staff of the Department of History at Michigan, especially Lorna Altstetter and Kathleen King, for keeping everything running smoothly and handling various bureaucratic snags during my years abroad. Kathleen deserves a second mention for being a friend and confidante throughout my time in Ann Arbor and making the Department’s office an always-welcoming retreat from the outside world. A number of institutions generously provided funds that supported over two years of research in Istanbul, Venice, London, and Crete. A fellowship from the American Research Institute in Turkey (ARIT), funded by the State Department’s Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, kicked off my research in Istanbul in 2008. A Fulbright-Hays DDRA fellowship, administered by the Department of Education, continued it for another year. Later, a Rackham International Research Award and grants from the Department of History and the Medieval and Early Modern Studies Program at the University of Michigan financed further research in Istanbul and in Venice. After my iv return to Ann Arbor in the summer of 2010, the Mellon Humanities Dissertation Writing Seminar, convened by Linda Gregerson, supported ten precious weeks of intensive writing and provided an interdisciplinary forum to discuss the process and its results; I thank my fellow seminar participants, whose keen insights on a chapter-in-progress had a lasting impact. A Multi-Country Research Fellowship from the Council of American Overseas Research Centers sent me back into the field in the summer of 2011, funding essential work in London, Crete, and Istanbul. Starting that fall, a Mellon/ACLS Dissertation Completion Fellowship allowed me to concentrate on writing full-time and saw me through to the end. During my time abroad, I benefited greatly from the expertise and goodwill of fellow researchers and the professional staffs at all the institutions where I worked. In Istanbul, I would like to thank the administrations, archivists and librarians of the Prime Ministry’s Ottoman Archives, the Süleymaniye Library, and the library of the Islam Research Center (İSAM) for granting me access to their collections and for responding to my requests with good humor and remarkable efficiency. Research in the Ottoman archives was always a pleasure, made more so by the companionship of a revolving cast of fellow Ottomanists. Matt Ellis, David Gutman, Vjeran Kursar, James Meyer, Fulya Özkan, Zeynep Türkyılmaz, Will Smiley, and many others shared countless glasses of tea with me in the archive tea gardens—my sincere thanks to its hardworking staff—and more than a few elliliks after hours. Guy Burak showed me the ropes at the Süleymaniye and how to work with fetva collections; I am deeply indebted to him for his help. My home in Istanbul for nearly two years was the ARIT Istanbul hostel in the beautiful Bosphorus-side neighborhood of Arnavutköy. I thank Tony Greenwood and Gülden v Güneri for making ARIT such a warm and hospitable environment. I will mourn when it moves to its new location. Research in the Serenissima was made possible and infinitely more enjoyable by the presence of Tijana Krstic and Natalie Rothman, who introduced me to the beguiling world of the Venetian archives and helped me make the most of my stay. Both are exemplars of selfless generosity. I am grateful to the staff of the State Archives of Venice for giving me research permission and for granting me extra time to photograph documents near the end of my visit. My thanks go also to the staff of The National Archives of the United Kingdom in Kew Gardens, London. They run a tight ship. While in the U.K., Colin Heywood welcomed me into his home in Hull and shared his vast knowledge of things maritime. In Greece, I benefited immensely from the kindness and generosity of an array of scholars and friends. Yannis Spyropoulous provided contacts and advice. Alexander Katsigiannis and Katerina Stathi hosted me in turn in Athens and provided invaluable logistical support and good company. Marinos Sariyannis and his colleagues at the Institute for Mediterranean Studies in Rethymnon, Crete, went above and beyond the call of duty, making introductions, supplying transcriptions, and extending a warm welcome to the island. Research at the Vikelaia Municipal Library in Herakleion would not have been possible (nor, indeed, would it have been undertaken) without Marinos’ early encouragement and, years later, his facilitation. I am extremely grateful to him. I would also like to thank the director and staff of the Vikelaia for giving me permission to look at and photograph everything I wanted, and for the kind offers of coffee, pastries, and fruit that brightened long days immersed in seventeenth-century court records. For responding vi to inquiries and providing helpful advice and connections, I thank Eyal Ginio, Molly Greene, Marie Kelleher, and Nicolas Vatin. Portions of this dissertation were presented at numerous conferences, as well as at the Medieval and Early Modern Studies (2011) and History (2012) dissertation writing seminars at Michigan; the Adriatic Frontiers Workshop at the Mediterranean Research Meeting in Montecatini Terme (2010); the Violence in Ottoman Anatolia workshop at NYU (2011); the Current Research on a Shared European, Ottoman, and Mediterranean History (2010) and The Well-Connected Domains (2011) meetings at Heidelberg University; the Pre-Modern Colloquium at Michigan (2012); and the Mediterranean Seminar’s Maritime Mediterranean workshop at UCSD (2012). I would like to express my deep appreciation to all the participants for their probing questions and constructive feedback and, for giving me the opportunity to share my work, extend my heartfelt thanks to the organizers, conveners, and commenters Brian Catlos, Pascal Firges, Tobias Graf, Bruce Grant, Tom Green, Maximilian Hartmuth, George Hoffman, Sharon Kinoshita, Thomas Maissen, Nabil Matar, Leslie Peirce, Amanda Philips, Leslie Pincus, Michael Ursinus, Christian Roth, Gülay Tulasoğlu, and Tom Willette. Special thanks go to my frequent co-panelists, collaborators, and friends, Tobias Graf, Nur Sobers Khan, and Will Smiley for the brisk trade in ideas and inspiration over the last few years. Traces of their influence are scattered throughout this work. Will also read the entire dissertation towards the end and provided helpful comments. The fabulous Alison DeSimone read much of it at earlier, rougher stages. The final product is far better for her efforts, as is my taste in music. vii My friends and colleagues in History at Michigan have been a constant source of inspiration. I would like to thank the members of my cohort who were my close companions in the early years, kept me connected to Ann Arbor during my time away, and provided advice and support throughout: Sheree Brown, Ian Campbell, Emily Price, and Sara Lampert. I would also like to acknowledge the kindness and friendship of those who regularly kibitzed with me in the halls of Haven during my final years in Ann Arbor, especially Richard Antaramian, Yoni Brack, Melissa Johnson, Nevila Pahumi, Anshuman Pandey and Kimberly Powers.
Recommended publications
  • Scenario Book 1
    Here I Stand SCENARIO BOOK 1 SCENARIO BOOK T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S ABOUT THIS BOOK ......................................................... 2 Controlling 2 Powers ........................................................... 6 GETTING STARTED ......................................................... 2 Domination Victory ............................................................. 6 SCENARIOS ....................................................................... 2 PLAY-BY-EMAIL TIPS ...................................................... 6 Setup Guidelines .................................................................. 2 Interruptions to Play ............................................................ 6 1517 Scenario ...................................................................... 3 Response Card Play ............................................................. 7 1532 Scenario ...................................................................... 4 DESIGNER’S NOTES ........................................................ 7 Tournament Scenario ........................................................... 5 EXTENDED EXAMPLE OF PLAY................................... 8 SETTING YOUR OWN TIME LIMIT ............................... 6 THE GAME AS HISTORY................................................. 11 GAMES WITH 3 TO 5 PLAYERS ..................................... 6 CHARACTERS OF THE REFORMATION ...................... 15 Configurations ..................................................................... 6 EVENTS OF THE REFORMATION
    [Show full text]
  • Barbary Pirates Peace Treaty
    Barbary Pirates Peace Treaty AllenIs Hernando still hinged vulval secondly when Alden while highlightpromissory lividly? Davidde When enraptures Emilio quirk that his exposes. mayoralties buffeted not deprecatingly enough, is Matthew null? Shortly after president now colombia, and mutual respect to be safe passage for all or supplies and crew sailed a fight? Free school at peace upon terms of barbary pirates peace treaty did peace. Also missing features; pirates in barbary powers wars. European states in peace treaty of pirates on and adams feared that his men managed to. Mediterranean sea to build a decade before he knew. From the treaty eliminating tribute? Decatur also meant to treaty with the american sailors held captive during the terms apply to the limited physical violence. As means of a lucrative trade also has been under the. Not pirates had treaties by barbary states had already knew it will sometimes wise man git close to peace treaty between their shipping free. The barbary powers wars gave jefferson refused to learn how should continue payment of inquiry into the settlers were still needs you. Perhaps above may have javascript disabled or less that peace. Tunis and gagged and at each one sent a hotbed of a similar treaties not? Yet to pirates and passengers held captive american squadron passed an ebrybody een judea. President ordered to. Only with barbary pirates peace treaty with their promises cast a hunt, have detected unusual traffic activity from. Independent foreign ships, treaty was peace with my thanks to end of washington to the harbor narrow and defense policy against american.
    [Show full text]
  • Title Page Diss
    Pre-Modern Iberian Fragments in the Present: Studies in Philology, Time, Representation and Value By Heather Marie Bamford A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Hispanic Languages and Literatures in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in Charge: Professor Jesús Rodríguez-Velasco, Co-Chair Professor José Rabasa, Co-Chair Professor Hans Ulrich Gumbrecht Professor Ignacio Navarrete Professor David Hult Fall 2010 1 Abstract Pre-Modern Iberian Fragments in the Present: Studies in Philology, Time, Representation, and Value by Heather Marie Bamford Doctor of Philosophy in Hispanic Literatures and Languages University of California, Berkeley Professors Jesús Rodríguez-Velasco and José Rabasa, Co-Chairs This dissertation examines the uses of medieval and early-modern Iberian cultural objects in the present. It draws on the notion of fragment and actual fragmentary testimonies to study how pre- modern Iberian things and texts are reconstituted and used for various projects of personal, institutional, national and transnational reconstitution in the present. The corpus objects are necessarily diverse in chronological scope, with examples from the medieval, early-modern and modern periods, and touch upon works of many genres: chivalric romance, royal and personal correspondence, early-modern and modern historiography, Hispano-Arabic and Hispano-Hebrew lyric, inscriptions, pre-modern and modern biographies and 21st century book exhibitions. The dissertation proposes that Iberian fragments are engaged in various forms of reconstitution or production in the present and, at the same time, are held as timeless, unchanging entities that have the capability to allow users to connect with something genuinely old, truly Spanish and, indeed, eternal.
    [Show full text]
  • 6 X 10.Long New.P65
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-88628-4 - European Warfare, 1350-1750 Edited by Frank Tallett and D. J. B. Trim Index More information Index Abbasid, 112, 114 Aragon, 13, 30, 34, 255, 313 Abbeville, 56 Aragon-Catalonia, 236, 241, 243 absolutism, 123, 323 Arbedo, battle of, 214 Aden, 41 Argo, 64 Adriatic Sea, 45, 46, 98, 106, 108, 119 Argonauts, Jason and the, 64 Aegean Sea, 282 aristocracy, 13, 122, 314, see nobility Afghanistan, 43 armada, 246, 255, 256 Africa, 7, 9, 21, 33, 34, 37, 38, 39, 40, 43, against England, 36 293, 295, 296, 312 French, 244 African Ocean, 6 ‘Invincible Armada’, 237, 245 Agincourt, battle of, 52, 53, 186, 192, 206, Spanish Armada, 245 216, 229 to Crete, 296 Agnadello, battle of, 198, 224 Armenia, 43 Ahmed III, sultan, 146 armour, 25, 54, 69, 105, 114, 209–11, 223, Aix-la-Chapelle, Peace of, 173 226, 227, 228 akinci, 14, 116, 136, 141, 142, 143 Army of Flanders, 52, 54, 57, 81, 125, alay beyi, 156 164, 331 Alba, duke of, 276 arquebus, 25, 125, 127, 163, 210, 211, Albania, 40, 41, 196 212, 213, 215, 217, 218, 222, 224, Albigensian Crusades, 272 228, 230 Alcazarquivir, battle of, 34, 39, 280 Arte della guerra, 75, 159, 160 Aleppo, 41, 44, 115 Artikelbrief, 165 Alexander the Great, 114 artillery, 7, 23–25, 55, 61, 62, 105, 109, Alexander VI, Pope, 29 116, 124, 139, 178, 181, 182–3, Alexandria, Crusade of, 282 188, 189, 190–95, 196, 200, 201, Algeria, 28 202, 206, 208, 216, 230, 235, Aljubarrota, battle of, 204 241, 242, 245, 246, 249, 253, allodia, 121, 122 254, 256, 276, 317, see cannon; almugavers, 204 see also
    [Show full text]
  • Christian Allies of the Ottoman Empire by Emrah Safa Gürkan
    Christian Allies of the Ottoman Empire by Emrah Safa Gürkan The relationship between the Ottomans and the Christians did not evolve around continuous hostility and conflict, as is generally assumed. The Ottomans employed Christians extensively, used Western know-how and technology, and en- couraged European merchants to trade in the Levant. On the state level, too, what dictated international diplomacy was not the religious factors, but rather rational strategies that were the results of carefully calculated priorities, for in- stance, several alliances between the Ottomans and the Christian states. All this cooperation blurred the cultural bound- aries and facilitated the flow of people, ideas, technologies and goods from one civilization to another. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. Christians in the Service of the Ottomans 3. Ottoman Alliances with the Christian States 4. Conclusion 5. Appendix 1. Sources 2. Bibliography 3. Notes Citation Introduction Cooperation between the Ottomans and various Christian groups and individuals started as early as the beginning of the 14th century, when the Ottoman state itself emerged. The Ottomans, although a Muslim polity, did not hesitate to cooperate with Christians for practical reasons. Nevertheless, the misreading of the Ghaza (Holy War) literature1 and the consequent romanticization of the Ottomans' struggle in carrying the banner of Islam conceal the true nature of rela- tions between Muslims and Christians. Rather than an inevitable conflict, what prevailed was cooperation in which cul- tural, ethnic, and religious boundaries seemed to disappear. Ÿ1 The Ottomans came into contact and allied themselves with Christians on two levels. Firstly, Christian allies of the Ot- tomans were individuals; the Ottomans employed a number of Christians in their service, mostly, but not always, after they had converted.
    [Show full text]
  • CIRCASSIANS of UZUNYAYLA, TURKEY Eiji
    MEMORY POLITICS: CIRCASSIANS OF UZUNYAYLA, TURKEY Eiji Miyazawa A dissertation submitted for the degree of PhD. Department of Anthropology and Sociology Faculty of Arts and Humanities School of Oriental and African Studies University of London MEMORY POLITICS: CIRCASSIANS OF UZUNYAYLA, TURKEY BY EIJI MIYAZAWA ABSTRACT This thesis explores social memories among Circassians in Turkey. It is based on eighteen months’ field research in the Uzunyayla plateau, Pınarbaşı district of Kayseri province, central Turkey. The Circassians (Çerkez) settled there are the descendants of refugees who fled from the Russian invasion of the Caucasus in the mid nineteenth century. “Memory” here is used in a broad sense to include the experiences and expressions of historical consciousness in everyday interactions, as well as articulated historical narratives. By interweaving them, the present work aims to analyse the political process involved in the production of knowledge about history and society. In efforts to reproduce a community in their new homeland, Circassians emphasise their history and collective identity. The local elites from noble (worq) families dominate such conservative, essentialist discourses, stressing their status superiority over ex-slave families. They recognise historical significance and identify the driving forces of their history by reference to specific social themes, such as the opposition between the two status groups. They monopolise history as a resource by excluding ex-slaves from the production of authoritative knowledge. Here, memory politics, consisting of space construction, control over interpersonal exchanges, and hierarchized personhood, plays a crucial role. In that process, ex-slaves become muted, made passively to embody a “feudal” past. By contrast, in Karakuyu, an affluent village also known as “Slave Village”, male comrades produce social relations different from elite representations by committing themselves to alcohol drinking.
    [Show full text]
  • Slavery and Slave Prices in the Crimean Khanate (According to Islamic Court Registers) Nuri Kavak*
    Journal of International Eastern European Studies/Uluslararası Doğu Avrupa Araştırmaları Dergisi, Vol./Yıl. 1, No/Sayı. 1, Summer/Yaz 2019) ISSN: 2687-3346 Slavery and Slave Prices in the Crimean Khanate (According to Islamic Court Registers) Nuri Kavak* (Article Sent on: 12.05.2019 / Article Accepted on: 18.08.2019) Abstract Before the appearance of the Crimean Khanate, the Latin Kingdoms, the Byzantine Empire and the Russians as well had slave markets on the Black Sea shores and in the north of the Black Sea for a long time. In other words, when the Crimean Khanate became a major actor in the aforementioned part of the world, it came into possession of the slave markets which preceding civilizations had already created. Therefore, the Crimean Tatars made use of economic benefits of slave markets and the high profit of slave trade attracted the khanate. Especially, the difficulty of the Ottomans in obtaining slaves due to the end of the Ottoman frontier raids encouraged the Crimean Tatars. Thereafter, they became a major actor of slave trade. The inheritance (tereke) records and some tittle deeds (hüccets) of the Islamic court registers (şer'iye sicilleri) of the Crimean Khanate speak of slaves and concubines. The records about the need for and use of slave labor, commercial relations and disputes due to buying and selling of slaves, and emancipation of slaves show the significance of slavery in social and economic life of the Crimean Khanate. This study aims to shed light on slave prices and the place of slavery in the economic structure of the Crimean Khanate.
    [Show full text]
  • Fortification Drawings of the Baroque Age at the National Library of Malta
    European Journal of Science and Theology, December 2019, Vol.15, No.6, 197-202 BOOK REVIEW Lines of defence: fortification drawings of the Baroque Age at the National Library of Malta Denis De Lucca, Stephen Spiteri and Hermann Bonnici (eds.) International Institute for Baroque Studies, University of Malta, Malta, 2015, 399 pp, ISBN: 978-99957-856-1-1, EUR 850 In 2015, the International Institute for Baroque Studies in collaboration with Malta Libraries published its magnum opus ‘Lines of Defence: Fortification Drawings of the Baroque Age at the National Library of Malta’. This work is edited by three academics of the Institute, namely Denis De Lucca (Director), Stephen Spiteri (a leading scholar in the field of historical research focused on fortress building) and Hermann Bonnici (an architect whose specialisation is the conservation/restoration of Malta’s fortifications). Albeit the publication’s main forward was penned by Juanito Camilleri (Rector of the University of Malta at the time of publication), one also finds an informal one by Oliver Mamo (the National Librarian and CEO of Malta Libraries at the time of publication) followed by a general introduction to the collection of drawings housed at the National Library of Malta (NLM) by Maroma Camilleri (Senior Librarian at the NLM). This publication is an all-encompassing compendium of graphical designs relating to the diverse fortifications studded all over the Maltese Islands. It brings together a unique collection, mostly preserved at the NLM in Valletta, of plans and drawings of mainly eighteenth century military architecture in Malta and Gozo. This significant publication constitutes the largest collection of original plans, elevations and axonometric-type/perspective drawings of fortifications, projected and/or realised on the islands during the rule of the Hospitaller Order (1530-1798).
    [Show full text]
  • From Jerusalem to Malta: the Hospital's Character and Evolution1 from Peregrinationes, a Publication of the Accademia Internazionale Melitense
    From Jerusalem to Malta: the Hospital's character and evolution1 From Peregrinationes, a publication of the Accademia Internazionale Melitense Anthony Luttrell The origins of the Order of St. John remain somewhat obscure, and the homelands of the founder Girardus, perhaps an Italian, and of the first Master Fr. Raymond de Podio, possibly French or Provençal, are unknown. The emergence of the Hospital was an aspect of the profound religious revival in the West which generated a reformed papacy, monastic renewal based on Cluny, lay movements for the support of charity and hospitals, and the first crusade. Probably in about 1070 various merchants from Amalfi, and perhaps from elsewhere in Southern Italy, founded a hospice for Latin pilgrims in Jerusalem which was attached to the Benedictine house of Sancta Maria Latina; subsequently a second house was established for women. These hospices were for pilgrims and especially for the poor rather than for the medically sick. Their staff may have been lay brethren under some vow of obedience. The hospices seem not to have had their own incomes or endowments, their resources coming from the Amalfitans and the Benedictines and perhaps also from pilgrims and other visitors2. The crusaders' conquest of 1099 brought fundamental change to Jerusalem which became a Christian city. The number of Latin pilgrims and poor increased, the Holy Sepulchre was occupied by Latin canons and the Greek Patriarch was replaced by a Latin one. The Benedictines of Sancta Maria Latina lost their predominance in Jerusalem. The Latin hospice survived under its competent leader Girardus; it was detached from Sancta Maria Latina and was somehow associated with the Holy Sepulchre nearby.
    [Show full text]
  • Violence, Protection and Commerce
    This file is to be used only for a purpose specified by Palgrave Macmillan, such as checking proofs, preparing an index, reviewing, endorsing or planning coursework/other institutional needs. You may store and print the file and share it with others helping you with the specified purpose, but under no circumstances may the file be distributed or otherwise made accessible to any other third parties without the express prior permission of Palgrave Macmillan. Please contact [email protected] if you have any queries regarding use of the file. Proof 1 2 3 3 4 Violence, Protection and 5 6 Commerce 7 8 Corsairing and ars piratica in the Early Modern 9 Mediterranean 10 11 Wolfgang Kaiser and Guillaume Calafat 12 13 14 15 Like other maritime spaces, and indeed even large oceans such as the 16 Indian Ocean, the Mediterranean was not at all a ‘no man’s sea’ – as 17 the sea in general appears, opposed to territorial conquest and occupa- 18 tion of land, in a prominent way in Carl Schmitt’s opposition between 19 a terrestrian and a ‘free maritime’ spatial order.1 Large oceanic spaces 20 such as the Indian Ocean and smaller ones such as the Mediterranean 21 were both culturally highly saturated and legally regulated spaces.2 22 The Inner Sea has even been considered as a matrix of the legal and 23 political scenario of imposition of the Roman ‘policy of the sea’ that 24 had efficiently guaranteed free circulation and trade by eliminating 25 the pirates – Cicero’s ‘enemy of mankind’ 3– who formerly had infected the 26 Mediterranean.
    [Show full text]
  • NARRATING the NATIONAL FUTURE: the COSSACKS in UKRAINIAN and RUSSIAN ROMANTIC LITERATURE by ANNA KOVALCHUK a DISSERTATION Prese
    NARRATING THE NATIONAL FUTURE: THE COSSACKS IN UKRAINIAN AND RUSSIAN ROMANTIC LITERATURE by ANNA KOVALCHUK A DISSERTATION Presented to the Department of Comparative Literature and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy June 2017 DISSERTATION APPROVAL PAGE Student: Anna Kovalchuk Title: Narrating the National Future: The Cossacks in Ukrainian and Russian Romantic Literature This dissertation has been accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy degree in the Department of Comparative Literature by: Katya Hokanson Chairperson Michael Allan Core Member Serhii Plokhii Core Member Jenifer Presto Core Member Julie Hessler Institutional Representative and Scott L. Pratt Dean of the Graduate School Original approval signatures are on file with the University of Oregon Graduate School. Degree awarded June 2017 ii © 2017 Anna Kovalchuk iii DISSERTATION ABSTRACT Anna Kovalchuk Doctor of Philosophy Department of Comparative Literature June 2017 Title: Narrating the National Future: The Cossacks in Ukrainian and Russian Romantic Literature This dissertation investigates nineteenth-century narrative representations of the Cossacks—multi-ethnic warrior communities from the historical borderlands of empire, known for military strength, pillage, and revelry—as contested historical figures in modern identity politics. Rather than projecting today’s political borders into the past and proceeding from the claim that the Cossacks are either Russian or Ukrainian, this comparative project analyzes the nineteenth-century narratives that transform pre- national Cossack history into national patrimony. Following the Romantic era debates about national identity in the Russian empire, during which the Cossacks become part of both Ukrainian and Russian national self-definition, this dissertation focuses on the role of historical narrative in these burgeoning political projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Flying the Black Flag: a Brief History of Piracy
    Flying the Black Flag: A Brief History of Piracy Alfred S. Bradford Praeger The Locations and Chronological Periods of the Pirate Bands Described in This Book 1. The Greeks (800–146 bc) 2. The Romans (753 bc to ad 476) 3. The Vikings (ad 793–1066) 4. The Buccaneers (1650–1701) 5. The Barbary Pirates (1320–1785) 6. The Tanka Pirates (1790–1820) 7. America and the Barbary Pirates (1785–1815) FLYING THE BLACK FLAG A Brief History of Piracy Alfred S. Bradford Illustrated by Pamela M. Bradford Contents Preface xi Part I. Greek Piracy 1. Odysseus: Hero and Pirate 3 2. Greeks and Barbarians 12 3. Greek vs. Greek 19 4. Greek vs. Macedonian 25 Part II. The Romans 5. The Romans Take Decisive Action 35 6. The Pirates of Cilicia 38 7. The Scourge of the Mediterranean 43 8. The End of Mediterranean Piracy 49 Part III. The Vikings 9. “From Merciless Invaders ...”57 viii Contents 10. The Rus 65 11. Conversion and Containment 71 Part IV. The Worldwide Struggle against Piracy 12. The Buccaneers 81 13. Tortuga and the Pirate Utopia 90 14. Henry Morgan 97 15. The Raid on Panama 105 16. The Infamous Captain Kidd 111 Part V. The Barbary Pirates 17. Crescent and Cross in the Mediterranean 121 18. War by Other Means 129 Part VI. Pirates of the South China Coast 19. Out of Poverty and Isolation 137 20. The Dragon Lady 144 Part VII. To the Shores of Tripoli 21. New Nation, New Victim 151 22. “Preble and His Boys” 160 23.
    [Show full text]