DOCSLIB.ORG

Darpa-Pegasus.Htm.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Darpa-Pegasus.Htm.Pdf DARPA PROJECT PEGASUS Project Pegasus Category: Organizations - Political Organizations Description: Project Pegasus is a quest. Project Pegasus was begun in 1968 by Andrew D. Basiago, when he was serving as a child participant in the US time-space exploration program, Project Pegasus. Andy, a lawyer in private practice in Washington, was the first American child to teleport and one of America’s early time-space explorers, as told in his soon-to-be-published book, Once Upon a Time in Time’s Stream: My Adventures in Project Pegasus at the Dawn of the Time-Space Age. Andy serves as Team Leader of Project Pegasus. The mission of Project Pegasus is to lead the legal and political campaign to urge the US government to disclose its teleportation capability, so that this life-advantaging technology can be used by humanity to achieve planetary sustainability. Contact Info Email: Website: http://www.projectpegasus.net Office: The Law Office of Andrew D. Basiago Location: PO Box 2311 Vancouver, WA, 98668 http://www.facebook.com/group.php?v=info&gid=171297480834 Home | Members Section | Radio Archive | Subscribe | About Us Andrew D. Basiago - Comments, Questions & Answers October 18, 2009 Andrew D. Basiago returns to the program for a three hour discussion on Mars, life on Mars, Human activity there and his teleportation to the red planet and much more. We begin with the first hour to take some questions from our listeners. Topics Discussed: Bringing Metal objects while teleporting, Suits, Description of the jump room and the device, Courtney M Hunt. Does it take a lot of Energy to run the Jump Room, the Chronovisor or the Teleportation Device? Tokamak Fusion Test Reactor at Princeton University, Inventions of Tesla, Death Ray Experimentation, Keeping things Secret, FBI and CIA confiscation of Tesla's work, Foreknowledge of 9/11, We also discuss more on Bill Richardson, the David Wilcock/Andrew Basiago controversy and much more. We continue our discussion for another two hours in our members section with Andrew. We go into greater detail about Andrews trip to Mars, We discuss: The importance of New Mexico in terms of Military, Martian humanoids, Meeting the Martians on Earth, their language and Appearance, their high pitched voices and body structure, time displacement, quantum displacement, the Hunt family, the teleportation trip to Mars, Andrew didn't want to go to Mars at first, saving the human race, the atmosphere and smell on Mars, Andrew arrived in an underground bunker where the "elevator" was located on Mars. We discuss the cataclysm in 9500 B.C. that affected Mars and Earth, pyramids, Baalbek as a space port, Pharaoh Statues, the work of Carl Munch, the face on Mars, Giza in Egypt, the Earth and Mars link, skull fossils on Mars, What area did Andrew go to on Mars? The PIA10214 image, acclimatization on Mars. What was Andrews purpose for going to Mars? Hebefrenia, various life forms on Mars, insect hybrids, simulations or "threat tests", personnel being eaten on Mars, Plesiosaurs, different species, the "dog man", Human animal hybrids, genetic experiments on Mars, visitation to Mars on two occasions. Do the Martians want to come to Earth? We talk about Courtney Brown's Remote Viewing of Martian bases on Earth, the dominant races on Mars: Humanoids & Grays, Human underground bases on Mars. What is the civilization like on Mars? We talk about NASA and their exploration rovers, critics of Andrews work from NASA, the Moon mission, secret space program, Tom Van Flandern. Why the Secrecy about Life on Mars? We also talk about the Brookings report, origins of life on Earth, oil based economy. ecology, pollution free transportation and "free energy". Red Ice Creations DARPA Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency Agency overview Formed 1958 Headquarters Arlington, Virginia Employees 240 Annual budget $3.2 billion Regina E. Dugan [1], Agency executive Director Website www.darpa.mil DARPA headquarters in the Virginia Square neighborhood of Arlington. The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) is an agency of the United States Department of Defense responsible for the development of new technology for use by the military. DARPA has been responsible for funding the development of many technologies which have had a major effect on the world, including computer networking, as well as NLS, which was both the first hypertext system, and an important precursor to the contemporary ubiquitous graphical user interface. Its original name was simply Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA), but it was renamed DARPA (for Defense) during March 1972, then renamed ARPA again during February 1993, and then renamed DARPA again during March 1996. DARPA was established during 1958 (as ARPA) in response to the Soviet launching of Sputnik during 1957, with the mission of keeping U.S. military technology more sophisticated than that of the nation's potential enemies. From DARPA's own introduction,[2] DARPA’s original mission, established in 1958, was to prevent technological surprise like the launch of Sputnik, which signaled that the Soviets had beaten the U.S. into space. The mission statement has evolved over time. Today, DARPA’s mission is still to prevent technological surprise to the US, but also to create technological surprise for our enemies. DARPA is independent from other more conventional military R&D and reports directly to senior Department of Defense management. DARPA has around 240 personnel (about 140 technical) directly managing a $3.2 billion budget. These figures are "on average" since DARPA focuses on short-term (two to four-year) projects run by small, purpose-built teams. DARPA's mission DARPA's own introduction:[2] DARPA is a Defense Agency with a unique role within DoD. DARPA is not tied to a specific operational mission: DARPA supplies technological options for the entire Department, and is designed to be the “technological engine” for transforming DoD. Near-term needs and requirements generally drive the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, and Air Force to focus on those needs at the expense of major change. Consequently, a large organization like DoD needs a place like DARPA whose only charter is radical innovation. DARPA looks beyond today’s known needs and requirements. As military historian John Chambers noted, “None of the most important weapons transforming warfare in the 20th century – the airplane, tank, radar, jet engine, helicopter, electronic computer, not even the atomic bomb – owed its initial development to a doctrinal requirement or request of the military.”[3] None of them. And to this list, DARPA would add unmanned systems, Global Positioning System (GPS) and Internet technologies. DARPA’s approach is to imagine what capabilities a military commander might want in the future and accelerate those capabilities into being through technology demonstrations. These not only provide options to the commander, but also change minds about what is technologically possible today. DARPA as a model According to former DARPA Director Tony Tether and W. B. Bonvillian (“Power Play,” W. B. Bonvillian, The American Interest, Volume II, p 39, November-December 2006), DARPA's key characteristics to be replicated to reproduce DARPA's success are:[4] Small and flexible: DARPA has only about 140 technical professionals; some have referred to DARPA as “100 geniuses connected by a travel agent.”[citation needed][who?] Flat organization: DARPA avoids hierarchy, essentially operating at only two management levels to ensure the free and rapid flow of information and ideas, and rapid decision-making. Autonomy and freedom from bureaucratic impediments: DARPA has an exemption from Title V civilian personnel specifications, which provides for a direct hiring authority to hire talent with the expediency not allowed by the standard civil service process. Eclectic, world-class technical staff and performers: DARPA seeks great talent and ideas from industry, universities, government laboratories, and individuals, mixing disciplines and theoretical and experimental strengths. DARPA neither owns nor operates any laboratories or facilities, and the overwhelming majority of the research it sponsors is done in industry and universities. Very little of DARPA’s research is performed at government labs. Teams and networks: At its very best, DARPA creates and sustains great teams of researchers from different disciplines that collaborate and share in the teams’ advances. Hiring continuity and change: DARPA’s technical staff is hired or assigned for four to six years. Like any strong organization, DARPA mixes experience and change. It retains a base of experienced experts – its Office Directors and support staff – who are knowledgeable about DoD. The staff is rotated to ensure fresh thinking and perspectives, and to have room to bring technical staff from new areas into DARPA. It also allows the program managers to be bold and not fear failure. Project-based assignments organized around a challenge model: DARPA organizes a significant part of its portfolio around specific technology challenges. It foresees new innovation-based capabilities and then works back to the fundamental breakthroughs required to make them possible. Although individual projects typically last three to five years, major technological challenges may be addressed over longer time periods, ensuring patient investment on a series of focused steps and keeping teams together for ongoing collaboration. Continued funding for DARPA projects is based on passing specific milestones, sometimes called “go/no-go’s.” Outsourced support personnel: DARPA extensively leverages technical, contracting, and administrative services from other DoD agencies and branches of the military. This provides DARPA the flexibility to get into and out of an area without the burden of sustaining staff, while building cooperative alliances with its “agents.” These outside agents help create a constituency in their respective organizations for adopting the technology. Outstanding program managers: The best DARPA program managers have always been freewheeling zealots in pursuit of their goals. The Director’s most important task is to recruit and hire very creative people with big ideas, and empower them.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Recursive Incentives and Innovation in Social Networks
    Recruiting Hay to Find Needles: Recursive Incentives and Innovation in Social Networks Erik P. Duhaime1, Brittany M. Bond1, Qi Yang1, Patrick de Boer2, & Thomas W. Malone1 1Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2University of Zurich Finding innovative solutions to complex problems is often about finding people who have access to novel information and alternative viewpoints. Research has found that most people are connected to each other through just a few degrees of separation, but successful social search is often difficult because it depends on people using their weak ties to make connections to distant social networks. Recursive incentive schemes have shown promise for social search by motivating people to use their weak ties to find distant targets, such as specific people or even weather balloons placed at undisclosed locations. Here, we report on a case study of a similar recursive incentive scheme for finding innovative ideas. Specifically, we implemented a competition to reward individual(s) who helped refer Grand Prize winner(s) in MIT’s Climate CoLab, an open innovation platform for addressing global climate change. Using data on over 78,000 CoLab members and over 36,000 people from over 100 countries who engaged with the referral contest, we find that people who are referred using this method are more likely than others both to submit proposals and to submit high quality proposals. Furthermore, we find suggestive evidence that among the contributors referred via the contest, those who had more than one degree of separation from a pre-existing CoLab member were more likely to submit high quality proposals. Thus, the results from this case study are consistent with the theory that people from distant networks are more likely to provide innovative solutions to complex problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Qualifications: Dr
    Scott Pinkstaff UNIV 200 M/W 2/23/2015 Source 9 Research Question: How does having the positive support of family as well as the availability of private insurance and an active lifestyle affect the treatment of men who have been exposed to Agent Orange during the Vietnam War who have been diagnosed with Prostate Cancer in comparison to those who have to rely on the support of the Veterans Affairs health system? Is there a difference between these men and the general population of men diagnosed with Prostate Cancer in the United States? Citation: Stellman, Jeanne, Steven Stellman, Richard Christian, Tracy Weber, and Carrie Tomasallo “The extent and patterns of usage of Agent Orange and other herbicides in Vietnam” Nature, 422 (2003):681‐687. Web. 23 Feb. 2016. Qualifications: Dr. Jeanne Stellman received her PhD in 1972 from City University of New York and has spent her career focusing on occupational and environmental issues in public health with a considerable amount of experience in Agent Orange and other military herbicides used in Vietnam. She and her husband, Dr. Steven Stellman have worked on creating a geographic information system that has been used to estimate the exposer to various herbicides and defoliants in Vietnam under contract by the National Academy of Sciences that has been backed by the Institute of Medicine. She and her husband are professors of Health Policy and Management at Columbia University. Main Claim: Herbicides were sprayed by the United States for military purposes during the Vietnam War at far greater rates then domestically. Sub Claim(s): When a link of dioxins to birth defects was established and the use of them were banned within the United States, the Military actually soon followed halting the use by 1971, 4 years before the end of the war.
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey of Systemic Risk Analytics
    OFFICE OF FINANCIAL RESEARCH U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Office of Financial Research Working Paper #0001 January 5, 2012 A Survey of Systemic Risk Analytics 1 Dimitrios Bisias 2 Mark Flood 3 Andrew W. Lo 4 Stavros Valavanis 1 MIT Operations Research Center 2 Senior Policy Advisor, OFR, [email protected] 3 MIT Sloan School of Management, [email protected] 4 MIT Laboratory for Financial Engineering The Office of Financial Research (OFR) Working Paper Series allows staff and their co-authors to disseminate preliminary research findings in a format intended to generate discussion and critical comments. Papers in the OFR Working Paper Series are works in progress and subject to revision. Views and opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent official OFR or Treasury positions or policy. Comments are welcome as are suggestions for improvements, and should be directed to the authors. OFR Working Papers may be quoted without additional permission. www.treasury.gov/ofr A Survey of Systemic Risk Analytics∗ Dimitrios Bisias†, Mark Flood‡, Andrew W. Lo§, Stavros Valavanis¶ This Draft: January 5, 2012 We provide a survey of 31 quantitative measures of systemic risk in the economics and finance literature, chosen to span key themes and issues in systemic risk measurement and manage- ment. We motivate these measures from the supervisory, research, and data perspectives in the main text, and present concise definitions of each risk measure—including required inputs, expected outputs, and data requirements—in an extensive appendix. To encourage experimentation and innovation among as broad an audience as possible, we have developed open-source Matlab code for most of the analytics surveyed, which can be accessed through the Office of Financial Research (OFR) at http://www.treasury.gov/ofr.
    [Show full text]
  • Reflecting on the DARPA Red Balloon Challenge
    contributed articles Doi:10.1145/1924421.1924441 how more recent developments (such Finding 10 balloons across the U.S. illustrates as social media and crowdsourcing) could be used to solve challenging how the Internet has changed the way problems involving distributed geo- we solve highly distributed problems. locations. Since the Challenge was an- nounced only about one month before By John C. tanG, manueL Cebrian, nicklaus a. GiaCoBe, the balloons were deployed, it was not hyun-Woo Kim, taemie Kim, anD Douglas “BeaKeR” WickeRt only a timed contest to find the bal- loons but also a time-limited challenge to prepare for the contest. Both the dif- fusion of how teams heard about the Challenge and the solution itself dem- Reflecting onstrated the relative effectiveness of mass media and social media. The surprising efficiency of apply- ing social networks of acquaintances on the DaRPa to solve widely distributed tasks was demonstrated in Stanley Milgram’s celebrated work9 popularizing the no- tion of “six degrees of separation”; that is, it typically takes no more than six in- Red Balloon termediaries to connect any arbitrary pair of people. Meanwhile, the Internet and other communication technolo- gies have emerged that increase the Challenge ease and opportunity for connections. These developments have enabled crowdsourcing—aggregating bits of information across a large number of users to create productive value—as a popular mechanism for creating en- cyclopedias of information (such as ThE 2009 dARPA Red Balloon Challenge (also known Wikipedia) and solving other highly distributed problems.1 as the DARPA Network Challenge) explored how the The Challenge was announced at the Internet and social networking can be used to solve “40th Anniversary of the Internet” event a distributed, time-critical, geo-location problem.
    [Show full text]
  • Rainbow Herbicides/ a Brief History
    RAINBOW HERBICIDES: A Brief History and Impact “Tactical Herbicides” Vietnam and Southeast Asia 1965-1970 Developed for use by Vietnam Veterans of America Wisconsin State Council’s Toxic Exposure Committee & Education Team - Team Wisconsin Copyright © 2019 Preface The intent of this document is to: a) provide a brief history of the use of “tactical herbicides” in Vietnam and Southeast Asia, b) share the impact tactical herbicides have had on Veterans exposed to these chemicals in the U.S. as well as exposure to these herbicides during testing, storage, and shipping, c) the impact on personnel who dispersed the more than 11 million gallons of Orange herbicide, hereafter referred to as Agent Orange or AO, used from 1965 to 1971” (Perkins Studdard, 2017)1 and the long-term impact of those tactical herbicides on our Veterans who served in Vietnam and Southeast Asia during the dispersal period, and d) the impact tactical herbicides with dioxins have had on Veterans, their children, grandchildren, and future generations. The information provided has been gathered from articles, research, and stories shared by Veterans. Today marks 55 years since the beginning (1964-1975) of the U.S. combat role in Vietnam. According to statistics gathered by The U.S. Wardogs Association, Inc. from 1995 and 2000 census reports during the Vietnam Era: a) 9.1 million military personnel served on active duty, b) 8.7 million were on active duty during the war, c) 2.7 million Americans served in Vietnam, d) 3.4 million (including .5 million offshore) served in throughout Southeast Asia (i.e., Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, and Thailand), e) More than seven thousand women served in Vietnam - 83.5 percent were nurses, and f) 58,202 Americans were killed in action.
    [Show full text]
  • Tags, Tweets, and Tethers
    February 2014 Tags, Tweets, and Tethers Introduction1 Dr. Dorothy E. Denning, On 29 January 2007, I opened my e-mail to discover that a colleague and U.S. Naval Postgraduate School friend, Jim Gray, was feared to be lost at sea. A noted computer scientist and Turing Award2 winner, Gray had failed to return the day before from a solo trip aboard his 40-foot sailboat Tenacious to the Farallon Islands, which lie about 27 miles off the coast of San Francisco. Over the next several days, I ob- served a massive search effort spring into action. Not only did the U.S. Coast Guard search 40,000 square miles, but a large social network also emerged to assist in the effort. Sadly, Gray was never found, but the scale and energy put into the search itself was inspiring. Since then, I have observed three other large-scale search operations, although none with life and death consequences. Indeed, all three were contests that offered prizes to the winners. The first of these, the Vanish competition, took place in 2009 with the goal of finding a person who intentionally tried to disappear under a new identity. The second, the Red Balloon Challenge, took place later that year with the objective of finding 10 red balloons that had been tethered to unspecified locations across the United States. Finally, the third, the Tag Challenge, took place in 2011 with the goal of finding five individuals in five cities of the world. In all four of these cases, social networks emerged to assist with the search, leveraging communications and information technologies, especially social media, to mobilize, organize, coordinate, and share information.
    [Show full text]
  • Bs Editorial
    https://telegram.me/TheHindu_Zone https://telegram.me/PDF4EXAMS 12 ISSUES AND INSIGHTS MUMBAI | MONDAY, 3 JULY 2017 1 > ance”. Nike succeeded because it man- not pass the muster of sugar/health or aged to hit on a new emerging cultural organic/natural, but it hit on the cultur- > CHINESE WHISPERS Cultural infusion in brands phenomenon in the US, of people run- al truth of authentic, almost forgotten ning to stay fit. Anyone and everyone old taste. In a sense even Fab India has After rational, emotional and social factors, experts have now decoded yet could do it. Nike’s heroes were not sports infused its brand with a strong cultural another magic ingredient that has been helping brands stay ahead celebrities (though they were featured in truth; authentic, natural, home-grown Who coined good & simple tax? the ads), but the everyday Joe who had fabrics and also great social values of pay- In his address at the Central Hall of bought it for purely emotional reasons, of time. So a detergent brand not only re- taken up running. Or take the brand ing a fair price to their vendors. Parliament on Friday to mark the launch of they will never be satisfied.” moved dirt, thereby giving the mother Patagonia. This very successful brand of This is just an indicative list. I am sure the goods and services tax (GST), Prime So rational reasons help the consumer the confidence to let her kids play in the outdoor wear hit on the cultural truth of there are many more brands in the Indian Minister Narendra Modi delivered a catchy stay satisfied with the purchase.
    [Show full text]
  • Study of the US Darpa Model and Its Applicability to the Indian Defence Research and Development System
    MANEKSHAW PAPER No. 43, 2014 Study of the US DARPA Model and its Applicability to the Indian Defence Research and Development System Bikramdeep Singh D W LAN ARFA OR RE F S E T R U T D N IE E S C CLAWS VI CT N OR ISIO Y THROUGH V KNOWLEDGE WORLD Centre for Land Warfare Studies KW Publishers Pvt Ltd New Delhi New Delhi Editorial Team Editor-in-Chief : Maj Gen Dhruv C Katoch SM, VSM (Retd) Managing Editor : Ms Avantika Lal D W LAN ARFA OR RE F S E T R U T D N IE E S C CLAWS VI CT N OR ISIO Y THROUGH V Centre for Land Warfare Studies RPSO Complex, Parade Road, Delhi Cantt, New Delhi 110010 Phone: +91.11.25691308 Fax: +91.11.25692347 email: [email protected] website: www.claws.in The Centre for Land Warfare Studies (CLAWS), New Delhi, is an autonomous think tank dealing with national security and conceptual aspects of land warfare, including conventional and sub-conventional conflicts and terrorism. CLAWS conducts research that is futuristic in outlook and policy-oriented in approach. © 2014, Centre for Land Warfare Studies (CLAWS), New Delhi Disclaimer: The contents of this paper are based on the analysis of materials accessed from open sources and are the personal views of the author. The contents, therefore, may not be quoted or cited as representing the views or policy of the Government of India, or Integrated Headquarters of MoD (Army), or the Centre for Land Warfare Studies. KNOWLEDGE WORLD www.kwpub.com Published in India by Kalpana Shukla KW Publishers Pvt Ltd 4676/21, First Floor, Ansari Road, Daryaganj, New Delhi 110002 Phone: +91 11 23263498 / 43528107 email: [email protected] l www.kwpub.com Contents 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Office of the President President's Council of Advisors On
    REPORT TO THE PRESIDENT AND CONGRESS DESIGNING A DIGITAL FUTURE: FEDERALLY FUNDED RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN NETWORKING AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Executive Office of the President President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology JANUARY 2013 About the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology The President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) is an advisory group of the nation’s leading scientists and engineers, appointed by the President to augment the science and tech- nology advice available to him from inside the White House and from cabinet departments and other Federal agencies. PCAST is consulted about and often makes policy recommendations concerning the full range of issues where understandings from the domains of science, technology, and innovation bear potentially on the policy choices before the President. For more information about PCAST, see www.whitehouse.gov/ostp/pcast. ★ i ★ The President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology Co-Chairs John P. Holdren Eric Lander Assistant to the President for President Science and Technology Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT Director, Office of Science and Technology Policy Vice Chairs William Press Maxine Savitz Raymer Professor, Computer Science and Vice President Integrative Biology National Academy of Engineering University of Texas at Austin Members Rosina Bierbaum Mark Gorenberg Professor, Natural Resources and Environmental Managing Director Policy Hummer Winblad Venture Partners School of Natural Resources and Environment
    [Show full text]
  • Limits of Social Mobilization
    Limits of social mobilization Alex Rutherforda, Manuel Cebrianb,c, Sohan Dsouzaa, Esteban Morod,e, Alex Pentlandf, and Iyad Rahwana,g,1 aComputing and Information Science, Masdar Institute of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi 54224, United Arab Emirates; bDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093; cNational Information and Communications Technology Australia, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia; dDepartamento de Matemáticas and Grupo Interdisciplinar de Sistemas Complejos, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, 28911 Madrid, Spain; eInstituto de Ingeniería del Conocimiento, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain; fMedia Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139; and gSchool of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, United Kingdom Edited* by Jon Kleinberg, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, and approved March 1, 2013 (received for review September 19, 2012) The Internet and social media have enabled the mobilization of large targets were visible for only 12 h and followed normal itineraries crowds to achieve time-critical feats, ranging from mapping crises around the cities of Stockholm, London, Bratislava, New York, in real time, to organizing mass rallies, to conducting search- and Washington DC. Our winning team located three of the five and-rescue operations over large geographies. Despite significant suspects using social media, without any of the team members success, selection bias may lead to inflated expectations of the being based in any of the target cities (10), demonstrating yet an- efficacy of social mobilization for these tasks. What are the limits other example of time-critical social mobilization in tasks that re- of social mobilization, and how reliable is it in operating at these quire coverage of large geographies.
    [Show full text]
  • Engaging Members with Projects Slides
    Engaging Members with Projects Grayson Randall Region 3 Projects September 2019 1 What engages members??? ▸In the “Old” days (before internet), people came to the IEEE for information. ▸Today, that information is all available online… oSo what is it that engages IEEE members??? - * Ability to network and meet new people - * Ways to discover what is happening in their community that is not online - * Ability to use, learn, apply skills that they do not use in the regular day job - * Working on projects that have social meaning and technical challenges Why do a Project ▸Engage our members ▸Educate our members ▸“Advance Technology for Humanity” (our tag line) ▸Stimulate interaction outside of IEEE - To teach the public about IEEE - To educate and engage students in STEM - To make the world a better place - Get new IEEE members 3 Projects Types of Projects ▸High School / College project teams (STEM) - FIRST Robotics - Future City - Local science events (i.e. Atlanta Science Festival) ▸Professional Competitions (Professional Development) - DARPA has launched a number of prize challenges in recent years: DARPA Grand Challenges (2004 and 2005) DARPA Urban Challenge (2007) DARPA Network Challenge (2009) DARPA Chikungunya Challenge (2014-2015) DARPA Robotics Challenge Trials (2013) DARPA Robotics Challenge Finals (2015) Cyber Grand Challenge (2016) - XPRIZE ▸Projects that support “Advancing Technology for Humanity” (Community) 4 What are the following examples: ▸ Variety of projects that should stimulate your thought process on projects you might
    [Show full text]
  • The Untold Story of DARPA, the Pentagon Agency That Changed the World by Sharon Weinberger
    2020-074 14 Aug. 2020 The Imagineers of War: The Untold Story of DARPA, The Pentagon Agency That Changed the World by Sharon Weinberger . New York: Knopf, 2017. Pp. x, 475. ISBN 978–0–385–35179–9. Review by David Cullen, Arkansas Tech University ([email protected]). The first decades of the Cold War produced two federal agencies—the CIA and DARPA 1—whose early successes led to a series of ambitious failures that badly damaged the reputation of US for- eign services. Of the two institutions, the CIA has been the subject of far more books (and films).2 With The Imagineers of War , noted journalist Sharon Weinberger 3 does something to correct this imbalance. Created in 1958, the “Advanced Research Projects Agency” (ARPA) was charged with closing the missile gap between the USSR and the United States. The Soviet Union had launched its Sputnik satellite in 1957, panicking many in the Eisenhower administration for geopolitical rea- sons. The United States needed to immediately develop new missiles to reassure Americans of their safety and intimidate Soviet leaders. Like the CIA, ARPA received little oversight by congres- sional committees. This was not an attempt, at least initially, to hide the activities of the agency but to free it from bureaucratic impediments. Sputnik and the subsequent failed launch of the US Vanguard missile created a sense of ur- gency at the Pentagon and among Eisenhower’s political associates. Established in February 1958, ARPA was meant to win the space race with Russia. Despite its half-billion-dollar budget, it had no permanent staff, laboratories, or offices.
    [Show full text]