Bruce Nauman : March 1-May 23, 1995
Author Nauman, Bruce, 1941-
Date 1995
Publisher The Museum of Modern Art
Exhibition URL www.moma.org/calendar/exhibitions/451
The Museum of Modern Art's exhibition history— from our founding in 1929 to the present—is available online. It includes exhibition catalogues, primary documents, installation views, and an index of participating artists.
MoMA © 2017 The Museum of Modern Art BRUCE NAUMAN MARCH 1-MAY 23, 1995
You recognize Bruce Nauman's work not by Each of Nauman's visual mediums is a language with its its look, but by its effect. Indeed, its lack of con own sensory vocabulary, connotations, and ambiguities. sistent style and the great diversity of media employed Meanwhile, Nauman manipulates verbal language as if are among his art's most salient characteristics. Since words themselves were a sculptural substance. In his the late 1960s, when he first appeared on the scene, hands a single noun or common catch phrase assumes Nauman has freely chosen his means to suit his spe a dynamic shape, qualified by gestural adverbs and cific ends, which, from his earliest experiments adjectives of light and color. Tone of voice is thereby onward, have radiated in multiple directions. At the translated into an optical equivalent—or the reverse, core, his constant aim has insofar as Nauman is equally been to question received likely to render his layered text ideas about human nature images as a whisper, rant, in terse and emotionally or song. "Please/Pay/Atten- forceful terms. Along with tion/Please" reads one of his other artists of his process- or early collage drawings, and conceptually oriented gen since then the artist has used eration, Nauman is a pio everything at his disposal to neer in the use of new get our attention and hold it. technologies, but he is also capable of extracting the The distinctive effect Nauman finest expressive nuance consistently produces in all from traditional methods, dimensions of his activity is a though he often does so purposeful entanglement of by denying the viewer a Untitled. 1967 the gut and the head. In so conventionally "well-made" doing he has greatly widened object. With equal strangeness and intensity in the the intellectual, affective, and spiritual scope of concep result, he may employ old-fashioned materials such as tual art, which has often been thought of and practiced wax and plaster; modern synthetics such as fiberglass as a detached mental exercise. In part, the narrower and latex; electronic means of display and reproduc estimate of conceptual art's aesthetic potential derives tion such as neon, holography, video, and recorded from a theoretical separation of the mind and the body sound; or live performance. Examples of all these dif that is deeply ingrained in Western philosophy. Ideas, ferent approaches are represented in this retrospec according to this schema, are a thing of pure reason, tive, which is the first comprehensive view of the while the body is captive to needs and instincts. Nauman artist's diverse activity to be seen in New York in over attacks this dichotomy with all the skill of a born logician. twenty years. Moreover, like others of his demanding and unpredic- table imaginative disposition—Lewis Carroll, for example, senses in the task of deciphering the metaphoricalsituation in or the playwright Samuel Beckett—Nauman revels in the which the viewer is physically located. In short, Nauman makes rational exceptions to reason and the weird poetry of systems us feel what it is like to think at the highest pitch of perplexity. gone haywire. Conversely,he makes us think about what it feels like to over flow with frustration, anger, longing, and alienated tenderness. The whimsy of Nauman's punning photographs and sculptural The riddles Nauman has phrased don't have "correct"answers. reliefs comes closest to Carroll's style of philosophical word Furthermore,his shifting but often abrupt forms of address pre play, while the stark neon litanies and harsh slapstick of his clude a single appropriate reaction. It is unlikely than anyone videos recast the absurd humor and existential dread of entering this exhibition and staying the course will come away Beckett. In the trajectory from works of the first kind, such as with a stable, or entirely coherent, impressionof what they have Eating My Words (1966-67) and From Hand to Mouth (1967), seen or of the fragmented world it describes. The ambivalent to works of the second, such as response Nauman's art provokes Clown Torture (1987) and One confirms the truth he means to con Hundred Live and Die (1984), vey: we are, at heart, contradictory Nauman's vision has darkened in creatures, vulnerable to confusion proportion to the increasing bright and denial, but capable also of a ness and graphic impact of his range of insights and reactions images. Nauman'srefusal to accept greater,subtler, and more surprising the classical mind-body split is not than we are ordinarilycalled upon to because he holds out any hope of a express. Insofar as art is understood more perfect unity of being. Rather, as a heightened and deepened he upends the hierarchy that sup experience of fundamental realities, poses the human intellect to be sov Nauman's art meets that standard ereign over our baser inclinations, on every count. showing how every aspect of our consciousness is pitted against Arguably the most internationally another, and every "natural" drive influential figure of his generation of dooms its own satisfaction. If art Americans (the one which came raises a mirrorto humanity,Nauman after that of Jasper Johns and rigorously calibrates his mirror to Robert Rauschenberg), Nauman distort our reflections to exactly the has faced the basic facts of life and point where our skewed self-images death, love and hate, faith and become inescapably obvious at doubt, and examined them close last, and the reflex behavior to ly—more closely, indeed, than is which we are slaves assumes its comfortable. His themes are the truly monstrousproportions. great themes of art, past and pre sent; his treatment of them Like other modern masters whose Bruce Nauman bespeaksthe quickening disquiet of art is premisedon turning a grin to a our age in its own distinct idioms. grimace—Pablo Picasso and Willem de Kooning chief among Taken singly or together, Nauman's sculptures, drawings, and them—Nauman can make you laugh and wince in the same environments may in some cases be difficult to comprehend instant. Unlike these predecessors, he not only confronts the and hard to take. Over time, they are harder still to forget. That, public head-on with alternatively comic and horrific images, he ultimately,is the test of art of the first order. surrounds them with nerve-jangling stimuli, leaving little room for distanced contemplation.Filling his environmentswith flash ing lights and deafening noise, Nauman transforms the act of looking into an experience that sometimes tests endurance. Robert Storr The point of these keyed-up installationsis not to shock or intro Curator duce stylistic novelty for its own sake, but to engage all the Departmentof Painting and Sculpture
Photo: © Donald Woodman UNTITLED 1965 fiberglass,polyester resin CourtesyAnthony d'Offay Gallery, London
An exampleof Nauman'searly "soft-shape"fiberglass sculptures, this is a two-part work, each part cast by laying liquid polyesterresin (coloredby var ious dyes) and fiberglassmats into a single handmadeclay mold. When the work was made, its strong organic associationsand crude finish differenti ated it from the rigid geometriesand pristine surfacesof Minimalistsculpture, the movementthat dominatedAmerican artistic practice at the time. Like many of Nauman'sworks, this one makes referenceto the human form; many have read the work as the legs of a dancer doing the splits.
UNTITLED 1965 fiberglass,polyester resin CollectionThe Saint Louis Art Museum MuseumPurchase: National Endowmentfor the Arts and MatchingFunds raised by the ContemporaryArts Society m Resemblinga piece of unfinishedArt Deco architecture,this is an exampleof Nauman's"hard-edge" fiberglass sculptures, which were cast in plywood- and-corrugated-cardboardmolds that producedsmooth shapes with sharp edges. While the work shares the regular, abstract forms and architectural associationsof Minimalistsculpture, its rough surfaces and mottled colors set it apart from the purity of sculptureby artists such as Carl Andre, Donald Judd, and Sol LeWitt.
3
UNTITLED 1965-1966 latex rubber with cloth backing Solomon R. GuggenheimMuseum, New York, Panza CollectionExtended Loan
Madefrom a single sheet of latex and slit into strips, this sculptureis an early exampleof Nauman'sexperiments with ProcessArt, a movementin which the propertiesof the chosen materialdictated the work's final form. Despite its seeming casualness,the work clearly evokes the human body, specifi cally that of a dancer. It also has been noted that the work bears a resemblanceto Nauman,who is tall, thin, and long-waisted.
4
A CAST OF THE SPACE UNDER MY CHAIR 1965-1968 concrete CollectionGeertjan Visser Exhibitioncopy
The drawing for this work was inspired by a remark Nauman attributedto the painter Willem de Kooning:"If you want to paint a chair, don't paint the thing, but paint the spaces betweenthe rungs of a chair." Like Shelf Sinking into the Wall. . . (exhibitionno. 8), the completedobject gives a normally unnoticed,intangible space a real physicalexistence. In works madeall through Nauman'scareer, chairs—and their arms, legs, and backs—have served as surrogatesfor the human body. This piece is dated 1965-68 becausein those years Naumanmade preparatorydrawings and a plaster test cast of the space underneatha chair in his studio, tying cardboardaround the chair's legs to make the mold.
COLLECTION OF VARIOUS FLEXIBLE MATERIALS SEPARATED BY LAYERS OF GREASE WITH HOLES THE SIZE OF MY WAIST AND WRISTS 1966 aluminumfoil, plastic sheet, foam rubber, felt, grease CollectionLinda and Harry Macklowe,New York
This sculptureis exactly what its title states it is. It also reflects Nauman'scharacteristic practice of enliveningseemingly abstract works by incorporat ing traces of a human presence.As the Nauman scholar Coosje van Bruggenwrites, "[Nauman]sets up an ambiguitybetween two kinds of observa tion—one in which materialsfollow their own course and another in which the processof thinking rendersthe object in its lyrical form." The association with stocks,the old woodendevice for lockingthe feet and hands of criminalswhile they are on public display, also relatesthe work to the many sculp tures Naumanmade that heightenawareness of the body by isolatingor limitingthe movementof one or more of its parts.
The numbers in this brochurerefer to the cataloguenumbers in the publicationBmce Naumanthat accompaniesthe exhibition. Gaps in sequenceare due to the fact that certain works are not included in this installation. 6
NEON TEMPLATES OF THE LEFT HALF OF MY BODY TAKEN AT TEN-INCH INTERVALS 1966 neon tubing on clear glass tubing suspensionframe Collection Philip Johnson O Exhibitioncopy o Early in his career, alone his studio, Nauman began dealing with the day-to-dayreality of being an artist. Instead of making traditional art objects, he focused on his social role as an artist, on his name, on his body, and on the very processof makingart. This self-portrait,an exhibitioncopy of an orig inal fabricatedin "uraniumgreen" neon, is an analysisof his own physicalbeing as well as of the tradition of figurativesculpture. Like Leonardoda Vin <