Dunn, Enlarging Rensselaerswijck
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
g Rensselaerswijck: Century Land isition on the East 31 f the River Shirley WV.Dunn CZrails State Histmk Site n 1660 Jeremias van Rensselaerwrote, “I bought the Van Rensselaers still claimed under Kiliaen van flat opposite Bethlehem, on the main land, from the Rensselaer’soriginal purchaseon the west side. After the Indians and have promised Pieter de Flamingh and English takeover, those claims were renewed. The city Carsten de Noorman that they may dwell there. .“t In was deemed too important to the province by British this casual way, much of the land in Rensselaerswijckon Governors Andros and Dongan to turn over to a single the east side of the river was acquired piece by piece family, even though the Van Rensselaer’sposition was during the seventeenthcentury. conceded to be valid.3 The east and west boundaries twenty-four miles distant from the river awardedin 1685 Some writers have assumed that Kiliaen van reflected not theoriginal bounds but the expansion which Rensselaer, when he established Rensselaerswijck, had occurred in over 50 years, as well as the need for a bought an extensive rectangle of land stretching from political boundary with neighboring jurisdictions, Beeren Island at present-day Coeymans north to the particularly Massachusettsto the cast. Cohoes Falls near the mouth of the Mohawk River, having equal length on both sides of the river, and What were the limitations of the early purchasesof extending back into the interior 24 miles. This imaginary Kiliaen van Rensselaer?How did his agentsand descen- tract, reported as encompassingmore than 700,000acres, dants manageexpansion of the Van Rensselaerholdings is a misunderstandingperpetrated over the years.2In his on the eastside of the Hudson River, prior to 1685?Who lifetime, Kiliaen van Rensselaernever owned all the land else obtained land within the proposed bounds of the described above. Although he had acquired land on the domain? These questions are worth investigating, since, west side of the river between the above north and south with persistence and flexibility, the Van Rensselaers bounds, he at first obtained only one limited parcel on maintained long-term control of the lands so acquired, the east side. This was followed by a second parcel on operating what might be termed their family business the east shore about six years later. The area north and into the middle of the nineteenth century. The early land south of thcsc two grants remained in Indian hands and ownership patterns had a far-reaching effect on the was not acquired by Kiliaen van Rensselaer.Moreover, developmentof a four-county areaand servedas a major the interior boundaries for all his early properties were focus for maintiining Dutch ethnic influence in the non-specific, making any accurate computation of Hudson Valley. acreageimpossible in his day. The registration of Kiliaen van Rensselaer and his The reason for the confusion about the fist Patroon’s associatesfor their colony in 1629 specified they were holdings is that in 1685, long after his deathin 1643,Van choosing land “above and below Fort Orange on both Rensselaer’sdescendants were awarded a patent by the sidesof the. River. .“4 Although this was merely an English for a very large tract of land on both sides of the early statementof intention to form a colony, Kiliaen van river. This patent contained the land commonly Rensselaerhad expressedhis goals. Those which he did attributed to the first Patroon.The English patent of 1685 not achieve, despite his persistent efforts, became the expanded the boundaries of Rensselaerswijck, par- goals of his family and officers of the colony in the years ticularly on the east side, to the limits requestedby the to come. Van Rensselaers,as part of a compromise settling Van Rensselaerclaims of many years’ standing. Granting the The Dutch West India Company patroonships in New boundaries requested by the family was intended to Netherland were to be governed by the “Charter of compensatethem for the loss of the City of Albany and Freedoms and Exemptions,” ratified in June, 1629, to a tract to the west of it, as well as for the loss of certain regulate and encourage these “colonies.” Article V of $ivileges and rights. The city had grown up on land the this charter specified: 43 14 SELECTED RENSSELAERSWIJCK SEMINAR PAPERS The patrcms, by their agents, may, at the place where they wish The De Laet’s-Burch farm later became the Van to settle their colonies, (fix) their limits (so that the colony shall) Rensselaerfarm known as Crailo, appropriated by then extend four leagues along the coast on one side of a navigable river, Director Jeremias van Rensselaerfor his personal sup- or two leagues along both sides of a river and as far inland as the situation of the occupants will pennit.5 port. A comparison of De Laet’s-Burch on the map of 1632 with the farm of Johannes van Rensselaer, an The Dutch West India Company was to retain ownership inheritor of Crailo, on a 1788 map confirms the similar of lands betweencolonies but promised that no one else location of the two farms.‘* would be allowed to come within seven or eight leagues of a patroonship without the owner’s consent, except in Having made his first acquisitions and begun settle- special circumstances. ment, Kiliaen van Rensselaer turned his attention to further purchasesfrom the Mahican Indians on the east Article XXVI of the charter presented Kiliaen van side of the river. In 1634 he wrote, “I wish that the Rensselaerand his successorswith an irresistible lure. remaining little islands and also the land that is on the Investors might “satisfy the Indians of that place for the east side of the river and belongs to the Mahycans, had land and may enlarge the limits of their colonies if they been bought also. Be pleased therein to do your best.” settle a proportionate number of colonists thereon.” Delays extended over three years until finally in 1637 a purchasewas made from the heirs of Papsickenakas,an Encouraged by this carte blanche, Kiliaen van Indian chief who had died after negotiations for his lands Rensselaer was prepared to acquire land beyond the had begun. Jacob Planck, Officer and Commissary of limits permitted by item V of the charter with his land Rensselaerswijck after 1634, finally concluded a acquisitions. His intentions were clear from the first. In purchase of the islands and mainland of Papsickenakas a letter of January 1630, Van Rensselaerhad urged his on April 23, 1637. This was actually about two weeks agent, BastiaenJanz Krol, to buy lands from the Indians. after settlers sent from Amsterdam in anticipation of the “The limits he shall extend as far as possible, as high acquisition had arrived to occupy their farms on the main above Fort Orange and as far inland as they will in any island.” The 1637 purchase encompassedthe large is- way cede,equally below Fort Orange,even if it were five land still known as PapscaneeIsland, with an accom- or more leaguesabove and as many below the samefort, panying small island (later known as Cooper’s Island) on and as far inland as possible . .7’6In 1630, land on the the west of Papscaneeas well as two other islands lying west shore stretching from below the present-day Nor- south of the large island. These latter on eighteenth and manskill to the CohoesFalls, “extending three leagues,” nineteenth century mapswere called Peghtals Island and and including also West Island (now the site of the Port Winne’s (or Campbell’s) Island. In addition, “all the of Albany) waspurchased. The estimateof three leagues, main and broken land situate on the eastside of the River a little over nine miles, was considerably short of the real aforesaid,and landward as far as their rig;htsextend” was distance. One parcel on the east shore from opposite included. This purchase, supposed to end “almost op- West Island to opposite Fort Orange was also obtained. posite Smack’s Island,” extended to below present By May, 1631, Van Rensselaer’s representative had Castleton village.12 bought from theIndiansadditional land on the west shore between Beeren Island and Smack’s Island. The interior A letter written by Kiliaen van Rensselaer in 1634 extent of this 1631 parcel was described as “two days’ recites his acquisitions of 1630 and 1631 and clearly journey inland.“77Of the first purchases,Van Rensselaer locates them on their respective sides of the river, clear- wrote in 1634 that the lands on the west shore extended ing up any confusion which might have,been causedby inland “indefinitely.“* For the Semezeeckparcel on the the vague wording of the deeds.The letter indicates he eastshore, neither the letter of 1634nor the deedof 1630 believed he owned all the land from Beeren Island to the specified a distance inland. CohoesFalls on the west side of the river. This letter also expresseshis expectation to add to Semezeeckon the east A new farm was to be established on the Semezeeck shore the islands of the Indian sachem,Papsickenakas, purchaseon the east side. Van Rensselaernamed it “De with the adjacentmainland.‘3 Van Rensselaerspeculated Laet’s-Burch” after one of his associates.On a map in 1634 that the acreage he had acquired amounted to drawn about 16329De Laet’s-Burch extended north and 17,200morgens of land, or about 35,OOlOacres. By 1636 south of a mill stream,now Red Mill Creek, and included he was suggestingto a partner that they had obtained over the large island adjacentto the north end of the property. 300,000 acres of land. Both guesses fell short of the ENLARGING RENSSELAERSWIJCK 15 fortheori inallands butalsotopreventconflictamong subsequent estimated manor acreagegiven by Cadwallader Colden lb in 1762as 1,132,OOOacrest” Colden was hostile to large settlers.