1 Luke Handout – Two Herods Herod the Great and Herod Antipas, The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

1 Luke Handout – Two Herods Herod the Great and Herod Antipas, the Tetrarch Herod the Great (Luke 1:5) was appointed king of the Jews by the Roman senate in 40 BC and took control of Jerusalem in 37 BC after defeating the Hasmonean king Antigonus. He reigned for the rest of his life as a client-king of Caesar Augustus. Since he was the son of an Idumean father and an Arabian mother, he was considered a half Jew at best and certainly not a king in the line of David! Famous for his building projects, he expanded the Jerusalem temple complex; constructed the city of Caesarea, where Paul was later held in custody (Acts 25:4); and built or rebuilt fortresses such as Herodium near Bethlehem, Masada on the western shore of the Dead Sea, and Machaerus on its eastern shore, where John the Baptist was later imprisoned by Herod Antipas (Luke 3:19–20). Herod was notorious for his cruelty, killing three of his sons because of fear of conspiracies and uncertainty about his heir. When he died, his kingdom was divided among his sons Archelaus (Matt 2:22; deposed in AD 6 by the Romans), Herod Antipas, and Philip (Luke 3:1). The consensus since the end of the nineteenth century for the date of Herod’s death is 4 BC. However, several recent studies of the first-century Jewish historian Josephus’s many references to Herod, as well as of ancient inscriptions and coins, propose that he died later, in 1 BC or AD 1. The date has implications for dating Jesus’ birth, which was one or two years earlier (Matt 2:16). Herod Antipas was tetrarch of Galilee throughout Jesus’ public ministry, a position he maintained until his exile in AD 39. “Herod” in Luke’s Gospel refers to him, except the initial reference to King Herod (1:5). Like his father, Antipas engaged in building projects—for example, in his capitals Sepphoris and Tiberias. Since Antipas arrested and killed John the Baptist, Jesus had to be wary of him (9:7–9; 13:31–33). The two finally met during his trial in Jerusalem (23:6–15). (Ibid. Gadenz p 36.) .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

John the Baptist According to Flavius Josephus, and His Incorporation in the Christian Tradition
JOHN THE BAPTIST ACCORDING TO FLAVIUS JOSEPHUS, AND HIS INCORPORATION IN THE CHRISTIAN TRADITION Johannes Tromp In Jewish Antiquities 18.116-119, Flavius Josephus includes a section on John the Baptist. His reason for including it was that it contained a widely circulating explanation for the victory of the Nabatean king Aretas over the tetrarch Herod Antipas. 1 In my translation, it reads as follows: 116. Some Jews believed that the army of Herod was destroyed by God, who quite rightly avenged the fate of John, surnamed the Baptist. 117. For Herod had John killed, although he had been a good man. He had asked the Jews to lead a virtuous life and to come together for baptism,2 while practising righteousness towards each other, and piety towards God. In this way, it seemed to him, was baptism acceptable: they should not use it to obtain forgiveness for the sins they had committed, but as a purification of the body, inasmuch as their soul had already been cleansed beforehand by righteousness. 118. When others joined them-for they became highly agitated by his preaching-Herod feared his influence on people to be so great that it might lead to some uprising; for they seemed to be doing everything according to his advice. Therefore Herod decided that it would be much better to take the initiative to have him killed before he was able to cause some revolution, than to get involved in matters once the revolt had begun, and then be sorry. 119. Because of Herod's apprehension,John was sent in chains to the aforementioned fortress of Machaerus and killed there.
[Show full text]
Salome: the Image of a Woman Who Never Was
Salome: The Image of a Woman Who Never Was Salome: The Image of a Woman Who Never Was; Salome: Nymph, Seducer, Destroyer By Rosina Neginsky Salome: The Image of a Woman Who Never Was; Salome: Nymph, Seducer, Destroyer, By Rosina Neginsky This book first published 2013 Cambridge Scholars Publishing 12 Back Chapman Street, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2XX, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2013 by Rosina Neginsky All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-4438-4621-X, ISBN (13): 978-1-4438-4621-9 To those who crave love but are unable to love. TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Illustrations ..................................................................................... ix Epigraph: Poem “Salome” by Rosina Neginsky ........................................ xv Preface ...................................................................................................... xxi Introduction ................................................................................................. 1 Part I: Creation of the Salome Myth Chapter One ................................................................................................. 8 History and Myth in the Biblical Story Chapter Two .............................................................................................
[Show full text]
Luke 23:4-11 Pilate to Herod and Back Crossroads: Traveling with Our Savior #6 March 12, 2008 Then Pilate Announced to the Chief
Luke 23:4-11 Pilate to Herod and Back Crossroads: Traveling with Our Savior #6 March 12, 2008 Then Pilate announced to the chief priests and the crowd, “I find no basis for a charge against this man.” But they insisted, “He stirs up the people all over Judea by his teaching. He started in Galilee and has come all the way here.” On hearing this, Pilate asked if the man was a Galilean. When he learned that Jesus was under Herod’s jurisdiction, he sent him to Herod, who was also in Jerusalem at that time. When Herod saw Jesus, he was greatly pleased, because for along time he had been wanting to see him. From what he had heard about him, he hoped to see him perform some miracle. He plied him with many questions, but Jesus gave him no answer. The chief priests and the teachers of the law were standing there, vehemently accusing him. Then Herod and his soldiers ridiculed and mocked him. Dressing him in an elegant robe, they sent him back to Pilate. (NIV) Have you ever had a once-in-a-lifetime chance and blown it? Maybe you didn’t even realize at the time what you had, and as a result you spent your opportunity on worthless things—and now it’s too late. This evening Herod has just such an opportunity—and blows it. The crossroad Jesus walks this evening is a short one—maybe a mile or so round- trip. It begins at Pontius Pilate’s palace, where Pilate has had an unpleasant start to his day.
[Show full text]
Asko Sahlberg's Herodes
Mika Hallila Uniwersytet Warszawski Retelling Salome: Asko Sahlberg’s Herodes Abstract: The article presents an analysis on the retelling of the story of the Princess Salome in a contemporary Finnish novel, Herodes (2013) by Asko Sahlberg. In the analysis, Salome’s story is considered as an outlandish narrative of an outlandish character that has interested people through history, and especially in the modern era. Sahlberg’s narrative of Salome is contextualized within some of the most known versions of Salome’s story such as the Gospels, and the play of Oscar Wilde. Eventually, the aim is to point out how and to what ends the rewriting of the story of Salome is done in this novel. Keywords: Salome, retelling, rewriting, outlandish, Finnish literature, contemporary novel The topic of this article is one of the most famous female characters of the biblical stories: I will analyze the story of the Princess Salome. The main focus of the analysis is on the retelling of the story of Salome in one contemporary Finnish novel, Herodes (2013) by Asko Sahlberg. I am asking how and to what ends the story is retold in this novel. When analyzing Sahlberg’s novel, I will especially focus on the narrator–protagonist Herod Antipas as his voice and his point of view make a particular change in the story of the Princess Salome. The key concepts formulated in the analysis are the ideas of retelling and rewriting, and outlandishness; as shown here, the Princess Salome is an outlandish character whose mystery has remained unsolved through history. The representation of the Princess in Sahlberg’s novel is, hence, part of a long tradition of the interpretations and reinterpretations of the well-known historical narrative which took place at the beginning of Christianity.
[Show full text]
Daughter of Eve, Femme Fatale, and Persecuted Artist: the Mythic Transgressive Woman in Oscar Wilde’S and Richard Strauss’ Salome
MONOGRAFÍA Amaltea. Revista de Mitocrítica ISSN-e: 1989-1709 http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/AMAL.51851 Daughter of Eve, Femme Fatale, and Persecuted Artist: The Mythic Transgressive Woman in Oscar Wilde’s and Richard Strauss’ Salome Corinne E. Blackmer1 Recibido: 1 de febrero de 2016 / Aceptado: 3 de julio de 2016 Abstract. Historically, Salome was a mundane figure who never catalyzed John the Baptist's death. However, in Christian Scripture, she becomes the seductress and fallen daughter of Eve. Her stepfather Herod promises Salome his kingdom if she dances for him, but she follows her mother’s wish to have John beheaded. In Strauss’s opera, after Wilde's Symbolist-Decadent play, Salome becomes independent of Herodias’ will, and the mythic avatar of the femme fatale and persecuted artist who Herod has killed after she kisses John's severed head. Her signature key of C# major, resolving to the C major sung by Herod and Jokanaan at her death, represents her tragic fate musically. Keywords: Salome; Herod; John the Baptist; femme fatale; Oscar Wilde; Richard Strauss; Symbolism; Decadence. Fille d’Éve, Femme Fatale, et l’Ártiste Persécutée: La Femme Transgressive Mythique dans la Salome d’Oscar Wilde et de Richard Strauss Résumé. Selon l’histoire, Salomé était une personnalité banale qui n’a jamais précipité la mort de Jean le Baptiste. En revanche, dans les textes chrétiens, elle devient la séductrice et la fille déchue d’Ève. Son beau-père Hérode promet à Salomé son royaume si elle danse pour lui, mais elle suit le souhait de sa mère qui exige la décapitation de Jean.
[Show full text]
Who Was Responsible for the Crucifixion Ofjesus?
C HAPTER 10 Who Was Responsible for the Crucifixion ofJesus? CAIAPHAS, PONTIUS PILATE, AND THE HERODS he question of who is responsible for putting Jesus to death has been argued and re-argued on a regular basis. Those who read the gospel T accounts literally assign the blame largely to the Jews, led by Caiaphas, and see Pilate as someone who unwillingly went along with their demands. Current scholarship points toward Pilate and the Romans who were seeking to prevent a riot, though Caiaphas and the other Jewish leaders might have encouraged such a view.1 Herod is mentioned in the gospels in relation to Jesus’ death only because Pilate sees him as a way to avoid responsibility. Historically, Herod probably had nothing to do with Jesus’ death, though he did put John the Baptist to death, whether to prevent a rebellion or because of John’s criticism of his marriage. The books of three of the five authors here—Burgess, Ricci, and Kazantzakis—divide the blame between the Romans, led by Pilate, and the Jews, led by Caiaphas. Mailer’s novel puts the burden completely on the Jews, while Ricci’s does the same for the Romans. All five writers draw on the gospels and noncanonical writings and legends in crafting their characterizations of Caiaphas, Pilate, and Herod. CAIAPHAS Burgess’ novel develops Caiaphas much more fully than do any of the other books. The novels by Kazantzakis, Ricci, and Saramago barely mention him, as does Mailer’s, though Mailer’s lack of mention means much more than those of the others.
[Show full text]
The Family of Herod the Great
The Family of Herod the Great Contents Herod the Great .............................................. 2 Herod Agrippa I .............................................. 3 from several sources, including: men if they would circumcise their genitals and ob- serve Jewish law.” (God’s ﬁnal whip against the Josephus, Flavius, Antiquities; and Wars of the Edomites was Rome. For the Romans used 20,000 Jews of the Idumeans as allies in the siege of Jerusalem, Edersheim, Alfred, Sketches of Jewish Social Life; 70AD. But afterwards, the Romans annihilated the The Life and Times of Jesus the Messiah; and The Idumeans, stating simply that they were a lawless Temple. and despicable race.) The Herod mentioned in Matthew 2 and in Luke Herod’s grandfather, Antipas, had been ap- 1, is known to history as Herod the Great. His pointed as the governor of Idumea by the Romans. family was Jewish, by race, but the were actually He died in 78 BC, and Julius Caesar appointed Idumeans (Edomites). Herod’s father, Antipater, procurator of Judea, who held the post from 47 to 43 BC. Edom is the name of a country lying south of Ju- dah. It is bounded on the north by Moab, and it After Caesar’s death in 44 BC, Rome was ruled for extends from the Dead Sea to the Gulf of Aqaba. a time by a triumvirate, including Mark Antony, The people of Edom were descendants of Esau, and who appointed Herod the Great as the tetrarch the country has a prominence in the Bible (along of Galilee in 37 BC. Herod increased the physi- with Moab) as the scene of the ﬁnal destruction cal splendor of Jerusalem and erected the Temple, of the Gentile world-power in the Day of the Lord.
[Show full text]
The Herodsherods - Part 1 HEROD the GREAT HEROD ARCHELAUS N King of Judea from 40/37 B.C
TheThe HerodsHerods - Part 1 HEROD THE GREAT HEROD ARCHELAUS n King of Judea from 40/37 B.C. - 4 B.C. n Ruled Judea from 4 B.C. - A.D. 6 n Son of Antipater and Kypros n Also called Herod the Tetrarch n Was an Edomite n Was the eldest son of Herod the great by his n Appointed procurator of Judea by Julius Caesar Samaritan wife, Malthace n Was advised by Antony and Octavian n Ruled Judea in Herod’s place but without the title of n Made “King of the Jews” by Roman Senate in 40 or 37 king B.C. n Was advised by Antony and Octavian n Was married 10 times n Had the worst reputation of all of Herod’s sons • Doris • Pallas (Matthew 2:22) • Mariamne I • Phaedra • Mariamne II • Elpis HEROD ANTIPAS • Malthace • To a daughter of Salome • Cleopatra • To a niece n Tetrarch of Galilee and Perea until A.D. 39 n A prolific builder n The youngest son of Herod the Great by Malthace n Reconstructed the Temple at Jerusalem n Brother of Herod Archelaus n Was despised by the Jews n Married a daughter of Areta IV, King of Nabatea, n Jesus was born shortly before Herod’s death but divorced her to marry Herodian, the wife of his (Matthew 2:1) — “Now when Jesus was born in half-brother, Herod Philip (Luke 3:19-20) Bethlehem of Judea in the days of Herod the king, n Pilate sent Jesus to him for judgment (Luke 23:7- behold there came wise men from the east to 12) Jerusalem.” n Built the city of Tiberias on the eastern shore of the n Ordered the slaughter of the Jewish male babies Sea of Galilee (Matthew 2:16) — “Then Herod, when he saw that he n Was disposed of his tetrarchy in A.D.
[Show full text]
Herod Antipas
BOOK REVIEWS 73 came to an end in 722 B.C. The most speculative part of the book is that in which Hammershaimb attempts to reestablish the mentality of the historical Amos. There is no doubt that something of Amos' personality comes across in the book that bears his name, but it is doubtful if we can reconstruct a biography to the extent here attempted. Altogether this work of Hammershaimb follows the style of his other learned works. The proposed scale of the book does not enable him to discuss the issues at length, but it provides a sound basis of interpretation from which fresh thinking can be done. Los Angeles Valley College, Van Nuys, California ZEV GARBER Hoehner, Harold W. Herod Antipas. "Society for New Testament Studies; Monograph Series," Vol. 17. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972. xvi + 437 pp. 1 map. $22.00. The work under discussion is a reworked doctoral dissertation accepted in 1968 by the University of Cambridge. Its origin as a piece of thorough research is internally betrayed first by the wealth of footnotes-almost 2000- which cover approximately 125 pages, or more than one-third of the text; and second, by a bibliography of 46 pages. Hoehner's Herod Antipas is the first scholarly. book-length treatment of the sovereign who killed John the Baptist and under whom Jesus lived. Other forerunners of this work have been either chapter-length studies of this king in connection with publications dealing with all the Herods, or popular books such as those by V. E. Harlow (1954) and G.
[Show full text]
Dead Or Alive? Five Facts That Point to the Resurrection of Jesus Christ
Alleged Historical Errors in the Gospels Dr. Timothy McGrew Oakwood Bible Church December 18, 2016 1 Luke 1:4 ... it seemed good to me also, having followed all things closely for some time past, to write an orderly account for you, most excellent Theophilus, that you may have certainty concerning the things you have been taught. 2 Some Important Questions 1. Is there internal evidence for the truth of the Gospels? ✓ 2. Is there external, historical evidence for the truth of the Gospels? ✓ 3. What is the truth about alleged contradictions in the Gospels? ✓ 4. What is the truth about alleged historical errors in the Gospels? 3 A map of the material External Internal Positive Non-Christian sources Undesigned Coincidences Incidental confirmations Other internal clues Evidence Objections Alleged historical errors Alleged contradictions in the Gospels between the Gospels 4 Our objectives this morning • To examine, from an historical point of view, several of the most common historical objections raised against the Gospels. • To draw some morals from our examination of these objections. 5 Some objections to Mark 1. Mark is mistaken about the geography around the sea of Galilee (Mark 5:1-13) 2. Mark is mistaken about the geography of the coast of Palestine (Mark 7:31) 3. Mark switches the locations of Bethphage and Bethany (Mark 11:1) 4. Mark is mistaken about the Jewish law of divorce (Mark 10:12) 6 Objection #1: Mark 5:1-13 They came to the other side of the sea, to the country of the Gerasenes. ... and the herd, numbering about two thousand, rushed down the steep bank into the sea and were drowned in the sea.
[Show full text]
The Life of CHRIST… Seeing the LORD Through Luke’S Eyes!
The Life of CHRIST… seeing the LORD through Luke’s eyes! Temple Baptist Church April 15, 2018 Part 88 The seven trials of Jesus 1. Before Annas - John 18:19 2. Before Caiaphas – Luke 22:54 3. Before the Sanhedrin – Matthew 27:1 & Luke 22:66 4. Before Pilate the first time – Matthew 27:2 & Luke 23:1 5. Before Herod Antipas – Luke 23:6-11 6. Before Pilate the second time – John 18:36-19:5 7. Before the People – Matthew 27:23-25, Luke 23:21-26 Trial 1-Annas They seized Him, and led Him away, and brought Him to the high priest’s house Gethsemane Possible Location of the House of Annas St. Peter in Gallicantu Jerusalem (aerial view from the southwest) 22:54 When they had kindled a fire in the middle of the courtyard . Peter sat down among them Traditional location of the house of Caiaphas (St. Peter in Gallicantu Church) 22:55 And he went out and wept bitterly Ancient street near St. Peter in Gallicantu Church 22:62 And he went out and wept bitterly Ancient street near St. Peter in Gallicantu Church 22:62 When they had kindled a fire in the middle of the courtyard . Peter sat down among them Excavations near the St. Peter in Gallicantu Church 22:55 Trial 2-Caiaphus As soon as it was day Sunrise over the Mount of Olives 22:66 Trial 3-Sanhedrin Trial 3-Sanhedrin Trial 3-Sanhedrin Taking Jesus to the Governor The Pilate Stone-1961 Trial 4-Pilate Location of the temple Antonia Fortress Praetorium NT:4232 praitorion (prahee-to'-ree-on); of Latin origin; the praetorium or governor's court-room (sometimes including the whole edifice and camp): KJV - (common, judgment) hall (of judgment), palace, praetorium.
[Show full text]
The Herodians
The Herodians Image from: https://pastorglenn.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/herods-family-tree.png Herod the Great [Matt. 2:1ff.] – Governor of Galilee (47-44), tetrarch of Galilee (44-40), elected king of Judea in 40 B.C. and ruled 37-4 B.C. After Herod’s death, Judea was ruled by 4 people (tetrarchy) (an arrangement made by the Roman Senate) Herod Archelaus [Matt. 2:22] – Ethnarch of Judea, Samaria and Idumea (roughly half of his father’s territory), 4 B.C. – A.D. 6 (banished to Gaul and his land became the Roman province of Judea) Philip the Tetrarch [Luke 3:1, Matt. 14:3(??)] – Tetrarch of Iturea and Trachonitis, 4 B.C. – A.D. 34 (died childless, land given over to Syrian legate, later to Agrippa I) Herod Antipas [Every Gospel reference except those noted above and Acts 4:27 and 13:1] – Tetrarch of Galilee and Perea, 4 B.C.-A.D. 39 (exiled to Spain by Caligula) Herod Agrippa I [Every Acts reference except 4:27 and 13:1]– King of the Jews, A.D. 37-44 (given Philip’s territories in 37, Antipas’ in 39, and Archaelaus’ in 41 Herod Agrippa (II) [Agrippa of Acts 25-26] – A.D. 48-66 (In 66 A.D. the Jewish Revolt broke out against Rome. Agrippa chose to fight on Rome’s side. The Romans won and left Jerusalem in ruins. The Herodian Dynasty ends here. The Herodians The Herods in the Gospels 1. Herod the Great, founder of the dynasty, tried to kill the infant Jesus by the “slaughter of the innocents” at Bethlehem.
[Show full text]