DOCSLIB.ORG

Satura Rādītājs

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Satura Rādītājs Modifications: the Cabinet of Ministers of Latvia order No560 (12.09.2008.) Modifications: the Cabinet of Ministers of Latvia order No395 (17.06.2009.) Modifications: the Cabinet of Ministers of Latvia order No94 (24.02.2010.) Modifications: the Cabinet of Ministers of Latvia order No367 (09.08.2011.) Modifications: the Cabinet of Ministers of Latvia order No444 (26.09.2013.) OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME „INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICES” CCI: 2007LV161PO002 MINISTRY OF FINANCE REPUBLIC OF LATVIA RIGA NOVEMBER 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ...................................................................................................................................... 2 LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................................. 4 LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................................... 5 ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................................................... 6 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................. 9 1. ANALYSIS OF CURRENT SITUATION IN SECTORS COVERED BY THE OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME “INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICES” ........................................................................... 11 1.1. TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE ................................................................................................................. 11 1.2. ENVIRONMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE ....................................................................... 31 1.3. ENERGY SECTOR ...................................................................................................................................... 39 1.4. DEVELOPMENT OF AN INFORMATION SOCIETY......................................................................................... 42 1.5. CULTURAL ENVIRONMENT ....................................................................................................................... 47 1.6. TOURISM .................................................................................................................................................. 50 1.7. EDUCATION AND CONTINUING EDUCATION ............................................................................................. 53 1.8. EMPLOYMENT AND UNEMPLOYMENT....................................................................................................... 75 1.9. LABOUR QUALITY – HEALTH-CARE ......................................................................................................... 95 1.10. INTERNATIONAL COMPETITIVENESS OF RIGA......................................................................................... 112 2. STRATEGY OF THE OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME „INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICES” 116 2.1. SWOT ANALYSIS OF THE OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME ......................................................................... 116 2.2. STRATEGY DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................................................ 125 3. DESCRIPTIONS OF PRIORITIES AND MEASURES .......................................................................... 132 Priority 3.1 “Infrastructure for Strengthening Human Capital” ............................................................... 132 Measure 3.1.1 „Vocational Education Infrastructure” ............................................................................. 135 Measure 3.1.2 „Tertiary (Higher) Education Infrastructure” ................................................................... 140 Measure 3.1.3 “Ensuring Educational Infrastructure for General Skills” ................................................ 145 Measure 3.1.4 „Employment and Social Services Infrastructure” ............................................................ 150 Measure 3.1.5 “Health Care Infrastructure” ............................................................................................ 157 Priority 3.2 “Promotion of Territorial Accessibility” ............................................................................... 163 Measure 3.2.1 “Promotion of Accessibility and Transport System” ......................................................... 165 Measure 3.2.2 “ICT Infrastructure and Services” .................................................................................... 172 Priority 3.3 “Development of Transport Network of European Significance and Promotion of Sustainable Transport” ................................................................................................................................................. 180 Measure 3.3.1 “Improvements and Development of Large Scale Transport Infrastructure” .................. 183 Measure 3.3.2 “Development of Sustainable Transport System” .............................................................. 195 Priority 3.4 “Quality Environment for Life and Economic Activity” ........................................................ 200 Measure 3.4.1 “Environment”................................................................................................................... 202 Measure 3.4.2 “Tourism” .......................................................................................................................... 210 Measure 3.4.3 “Socio-economic Impact of Cultural Environment” .......................................................... 216 Measure 3.4.4 “Energy Efficiency of Housing” ........................................................................................ 222 Priority 3.5 “Promotion of Environmental Infrastructure and Environmentally Friendly Energy” ......... 227 Measure 3.5.1 “Infrastructure of Environmental Protection” .................................................................. 230 Measure 3.5.2 “Energy” ............................................................................................................................ 241 Priority 3.6 “Polycentric Development” ................................................................................................... 249 Measure 3.6.1 “Support for Sustainable Urban Environment and Urban Area Development”................ 252 Measure 3.6.2 “Complex support to promote growth of amalgamated municipalities” ........................... 261 Priority 3.7 „Technical Assistance for ERDF Implementation” ............................................................... 268 Measure 3.7.1 “Assistance for Management of the Operational Programme “Infrastructure and Services” ERDF Co-financed Measures” .................................................................................................................. 270 Priority 3.8 “Technical Assistance for the CF Implementation” .............................................................. 273 Measure 3.8.1 “Assistance to Management of the Operational Programme “Infrastructure and Services” CF Co-financed Measures” ....................................................................................................................... 275 4. FINANCIAL PLAN OF OP „INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICES” ............................................... 278 5. ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK ....................................................................................................... 280 Operational Programme „Infrastructure and Services” 5.1. INSTITUTIONS INVOLVED IN THE MANAGEMENT OF FUNDS ................................................................... 282 5.2. PARTNERSHIP ......................................................................................................................................... 286 5.3. IMPLEMENTATION .................................................................................................................................. 288 5.4. MONITORING .......................................................................................................................................... 293 5.5. EVALUATION .......................................................................................................................................... 296 5.6. CONTROLS ............................................................................................................................................. 299 5.7. INFORMATION AND PUBLICITY ............................................................................................................... 302 5.8. COORDINATION OF THE ASSISTANCE ...................................................................................................... 310 6. INFORMATION ON EX-ANTE EVALUATION AND SEA PROCESS AND RECCOMENDATIONS TAKEN INTO THE CONSIDERATION IN RESPECT TO OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME “INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICES” ..................................................................................................... 311 6.1. EX-ANTE EVALUATION PROCESS ............................................................................................................ 311 6.2. STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT .......................................................................................... 314 7. ANNEXES .................................................................................................................................................... 316 Operational Programme „Infrastructure and Services” 3 LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1: BREAKDOWN
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ober-Haus Real Estate Market Report 2019
    REAL ESTATE MARKET REPORT 2019 / 3 PART OF Realia Group helps its customers to find the best services and solutions in all questions related to housing and building management. Our vision is to offer better living and real estate wealth to our customers. Realia Group is the largest provider of expert services specialising in the brokerage and management services of apartments, properties and commercial facilities in the Nordic countries. Our services include: • Brokerage services for consumers • Housing management • Property management services for commercial properties • Property management services for residential buildings • Project management and construction services • Financial management services • Valuation services • Energy management services • Residential leasing Realia Group consists of Realia Isännöinti Oy, Realia Management Oy, Arenna Oy, Huoneistokeskus Oy, SKV Kiinteistönvälitys Oy and Huom! Huoneistomarkkinointi Oy in Finland. A/S Ober-Haus operates in the Baltic region and Hestia in Sweden. Our customers include apartment house companies and real estate companies, private and public owners and end users of apartments and properties, fund companies, banks and many other parties operating in the real estate sector as well as consumers. All of our companies share the significance of customer experiences in the development of products and services. We are building a better customer experience by investing in customer-oriented service production, an active service culture and strong and competent operations. We want to be a customer experience driven pioneer in our field. The Realia Group's competitiveness is made up of strong brands, motivated and skillful personnel, and the ability and will to invest in working methods and processes of the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Protected Areas and Opportunities for Ecotourism in Latvia
    Protected areas and opportunities for ecotourism in Latvia Valdis Pilâts Gauja National Park, Baznîcas iela 3, Sigulda, LV-2150, Latvia [email protected] Introduction In Latvia similarly to elsewhere, nature based tourism and nature protection have clo- sely evolved. For instance, Gauja River valley with sandstone outcrops became a fa- mous destination place for travellers already at the beginning of the 19th century. German travellers who compared it to the Elba in Saxony and to the “Switzerland of Saxony” called it the “Switzerland of Livland”. In 1920s the first three areas of Gauja valley obtained the status of protected areas, and in 1930s a National Park of 375 ha was created there. During the first period of independence in the first half of 20th century Latvia had a powerful tourism industry. Income from tourism was almost twice the income from our main export product - bacon. Already in the 1930’s tourism was regar- ded as an essential component of regional development, which succeeded in stimula- ting economic development, maintaining the traditional rural landscape and also play- ing a role in public education about history and nature. Unfortunately, during the mid 1900’s Latvia was once again embroiled in war, and incorporated in the Soviet Union. As a result it was isolated behind the “iron curtain” and therefore still is a “blank spot “ on today’s European and World tourist maps. Nowadays Latvia similarly to other Eastern European States in post-communist transition period is looking for new ways to strengthen national economy. Tourism is one of the areas with greatest potential for development.
    [Show full text]
  • Rail Baltica Global Project Cost- Benefit Analysis Final Report
    Rail Baltica Global Project Cost- Benefit Analysis Final Report 30 April 2017 x Date Table of contents Table of contents ........................................................................................................................ 2 Version ...................................................................................................................................... 2 1. Terms and Abbreviations ...................................................................................................... 3 2. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 5 2.1 EY work context ................................................................................................................ 5 2.2 Context of the CBA ............................................................................................................ 5 2.3 Key constraints and considerations of the analysis ................................................................ 6 3. Background and information about the project ....................................................................... 8 3.1 Project background and timeline ......................................................................................... 8 3.2 Brief description of the project ........................................................................................... 9 4. Methodology ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • “Market Potential and Competition Analysis for Selected Ports of the Amber Coast”
    “Market Potential and Competition Analysis for selected ports of the Amber Coast” Final Report Riga, 2/04/2013 Client: Freeport of Ventspils Authority Prepared by: SIA "NK Konsultāciju birojs" Market Potential and Competition Analysis for selected ports of the Amber Coast Final Report, date: 02/04/2013 SIA "NK Konsultāciju birojs" Contacts: Mūkusalas street 42 Normunds Lukša LV 1004 Riga E-mail: [email protected] Latvia Direct phone: +371 29-115484 Phone: +371 67-609490 Fax: +371 67-609491 www.nkconsulting.lv Report prepared by: Tobias Merten Vladas Stūrys Normunds Lukša Page 2 of 122 Market Potential and Competition Analysis for selected ports of the Amber Coast Final Report, date: 02/04/2013 Notice This report has been prepared by SIA "NK konsultāciju birojs" (NK) with all reasonable skill, care and diligence within the terms of the Contract with the client, incorporating NK’s General Terms and Conditions of Business and taking account of the manpower and resources devoted to it by agreement with the client. NK disclaims any responsibility to the client and others in respect of any matters outside the scope of the above. NK undertakes no obligation to notify recipients of events occurring after the date on the front cover that might change the content or conclusion of this report. In preparing this report NK has used data from both its own internal databases and from third party sources, and has also interviewed representatives of the business community. NK can accept no liability for the accuracy of data sourced in good faith from third-party sources.
    [Show full text]
  • АВТОБУСНЫЕ МАРШРУТЫ VAKARBUĻĻI 3 30 56 JAUNCIEMA Mangaļu Pr
    29 58 (vasaras sezonā) Rīgas Jūras Līcis VECĀĶI Pludmale Pludmale DAUGAVGRĪVA '' АВТОБУСНЫЕ МАРШРУТЫ VAKARBUĻĻI 3 30 56 JAUNCIEMA Mangaļu pr. la daugava KAPI Pagrieziens ie ec Действует с 16 марта 2020 года 24 uz Mangaļsalus Plēksnes iela Zvīņu iela Daugavgrīvas D/P V. Pikuļa aleja ''V Attīrīšanas iekārtas a 36 Ziemeļupe eja Memmes pļava Dzelmes iela Zēģeļu iela Roņu iela Pludmale Vētras iela v ija ieki Z tn Osta Lielupe ns MANGAĻSALA Stac 11 Aizvēj cāķu Paegles Ska 3 (darba dienās) Parādes iela Daugavgrīvas Ve 30 (brīvdienās, vasaras sezonā) 30 (brīvdienās, vasaras sezonā)DAUGAVGRĪVA cietoksnis Bākas iela iela Jaunciema eiksmes iela prospekts Ķīļu iela Stāvvadu iela V Airu kapi Buļļupe SUŽI Vecdaugavas iela LANGSTIŅI Bolderājas Mangaļu prospekts poliklīnika Pagrieziens Vecmīlgrāvja D/P Atlantijas iela 11 19. vidusskola uz Vecmīlgrāvi Baltāsbaznīcas iela 28 A.DombrovskaKreimeņu iela iela Bukulti Stūrmaņu iela Kultūras pils "Ziemeļblāzma" Ādažu iela VECMĪLGRĀVIS Martas Rinkas iela Bolderājas Jaunciema Spilves pļavas Bumbu kalniņš Kleistu iela tirgus 8. šķērslīnija JAUNCIEMS VECMĪLGRĀVIS e Krievupes iela Vecmīlgr. 5. līnija Gāles iela Emmas iela Ozoli Kalēji Pagrieziens uz Carnikavu Zundagi Ziemeļblāzma Jaunciema gatve 233 Līgeri Langa Āliņģu iela Pagrieziens uz Jaunciema kapiem Niedru iela Jaunciema 1. škērslīnija Jaunciema 2. škērslīnija Jaunciema 4. škērslīnija 2 29 58 Jaunciema 6. škērslīnija Jaunciema gatve VOLERI Mediķu iela iela Milnas Lejasvīganti kapi Silikātu iela Mīlgrāvja tilts ūts DZIRCIEMA IELA Viestura prospekts 97 Jaunie Melīdas iela Kūdras bāz Buļļupe Ziemeļnieki . ži) Lielā iela Platā Guberņciems LēdurgasOstas iela iela Pagrieziens pr Suži Bolderājas 54 Silikātu iela uz Bukultiem Muzejs "Dauderi" Brīvdabas muzejs Lapsukalni Viestura prospekts 38 Klipiņas estura Ozolkalni Berģi ģijas instit Zilā iela Vi MAN-TESS Jaunciema Nordeka Voleru iela 3 Ķīšezers 10.
    [Show full text]
  • KĀ NOKĻŪT LĪDZ SILTĀ ĒDIENA IZSNIEGŠANAS VIETĀM RĪGĀ? (Tuvākās Pieturvietas) Lai Mazinātu Vīrusa COVID-19 Izplatību, Aicinām Izvērtēt Braucienu Nepieciešamību
    KĀ NOKĻŪT LĪDZ SILTĀ ĒDIENA IZSNIEGŠANAS VIETĀM RĪGĀ? (tuvākās pieturvietas) Lai mazinātu vīrusa COVID-19 izplatību, aicinām izvērtēt braucienu nepieciešamību. Ievērojiet visus piesardzības pasākumus! Pārdaugavā / Āgenskalna apkaimē, Daugavgrīvas ielā 1, darba dienās no plkst. 10.00 līdz 13.00 Autobuss 3 (Daugavgrīva – Pļavnieki) pieturvieta „Kalnciema iela” (~ 300 m) 22 (Abrenes iela – Lidosta) pieturvieta „Daugavgrīvas iela” (virzienā uz Abrenes ielu, ~ 120 m) vai pieturvieta „Nometņu iela vai „Kalnciema iela” (virzienā uz Lidostu, ~ 400 m) 32 (Abrenes iela – Piņķi) pieturvieta „Daugavgrīvas iela” (virzienā uz Abrenes ielu, ~ 120 m) vai pieturvieta „Nometņu iela vai „Kalnciema iela” (virzienā uz Piņķiem, ~ 400 m) 43 (Abrenes iela – Skulte) pieturvieta „Daugavgrīvas iela” (virzienā uz Abrenes ielu, ~ 120 m) vai pieturvieta „Nometņu iela vai „Kalnciema iela” (virzienā uz Piņķiem, ~400 m) 30 (Centrālā stacija – Daugavgrīva) pieturvieta „Valsts arhīvs” (~ 450 m) 37 (Imanta – Esplanāde) pieturvieta „Valsts arhīvs” (~ 450 m) 41 (Imanta – Esplanāde) pieturvieta „Valsts arhīvs” (~ 450 m) 53 (Esplanāde – Zolitūde) pieturvieta „Valsts arhīvs” (~ 450 m) Trolejbuss 9 (Stacijas laukums – Iļģuciems) pieturvieta „Daugavgrīvas iela” (virzienā uz Stacijas laukumu, ~ 120 m) vai pieturvieta „Baložu iela” (virzienā uz Iļģuciemu, ~ 600 m) 5 (Daugavas stadions – Paula Stradiņa slimnīca) pieturvieta „Valsts arhīvs” (virzienā uz Daugavas stadionu, ~ 450 m) vai pieturvieta „Baložu iela” (virzienā uz slimnīcu, ~ 600 m) 12 (Āgenskalna priedes – Šmerlis) pieturvieta „Valsts arhīvs” (virzienā uz Šmerli, ~ 450 m) vai pieturvieta „Baložu iela” (virzienā uz Āgenskalna priedēm, ~ 600 m) 25 (Brīvības iela – Iļģuciems) pieturvieta „Valsts arhīvs” (virzienā uz Brīvības ielu, ~ 450 m) vai pieturvieta „Baložu iela” (virzienā uz Iļģuciemu, ~ 600 m) Tramvajs 1 (Imanta – Jugla) pieturvieta „Nometņu iela” vai „Kalnciema iela” (~ 400 m) 5 (Iļģuciems – Mīlgrāvis) pieturvieta „Nometņu iela” vai „Kalnciema iela” (~ 400 m) Sarkandaugavā, Aptiekas ielā 8, darba dienās no plkst.
    [Show full text]
  • Operational Challenges to Port Interfaces in the Multi-Modal Transport Chain (Maritime and Hinterland Connections)
    Operational Challenges to Port Interfaces in the Multi-modal Transport Chain (Maritime and Hinterland Connections) 2013 Table of contest Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 4 PART I EVALUATION OF THE EXISTING SITUATION .................................................... 5 1. Research methodology ....................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Setting the Criteria ....................................................................................................... 5 1.3 Selection of indicators ............................................................................................... 11 2. Latvian ports ..................................................................................................................... 21 2.1 Freeport of Riga ......................................................................................................... 22 2.2 Port of Liepaja ........................................................................................................... 33 2.3 Port of Ventspils ........................................................................................................ 38 3. Lithuanian ports ................................................................................................................ 43 3.2 Port of Klaip ėda ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Environmental Investments 2006
    REPORT ON ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTMENTS 2006 Riga REPORT ON ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTMENTS 2006 CONTENTS FOREWORD ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 3 INVESTMENTS IN Environmental PROTECTION ����������������������������������������������� 4 ATTRACTION OF CO-FINANCING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ������������� 8 INVESTMENTS IN DEVELOPMENT OF water serviCES INFRASTRUCTURE ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 10 Implementation of the projects co-financed by the Cohesion Fund ���������������������11 Implementation of the ERDF co-financed projects ��������������������������������������������� 13 INVESTMENTS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 15 Implementation of the projects co-financed by the Cohesion Fund �������������������� 17 Implementation of ERDF co-financed projects ��������������������������������������������������� 18 INVESTMENTS IN NATURE PROTECTION �������������������������������������������������������������� 19 Implementation of the ERDF co-financed projects ��������������������������������������������� 19 Implementation of LIFE co-financed projects ������������������������������������������������������ 20 Implementation of INTERREG co-financed projects ������������������������������������������� 23 INVESTMENTS IN THE Radiation SAFETY �����������������������������������������������������������
    [Show full text]
  • 3. Pielikums. Informācija Par NO2 Piesārņojuma Līmeni Rīgā
    100 100 150 200 250 300 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 10 20 30 40 50 2 NO maksimālā kurās Apkaimes, attēls. 1. 50 0 . attēls. attēls. 0 0 Centrs maks. Centrs Centrs maks. maks. NO maks. novērt. zonā maks. novērt.maks. zonā novērt. zonā 2 stundas koncentrācijas koncentrācijas stundas vid. vid. Grīziņkalns Grīziņkalns maks. Grīziņk. maks. maks. maks. novērt. zonā maks. novērt.maks. zonā novērt. zonā vid. vid. Āgenskalns Āgenskalns maks. Āgensk. maks. maks. maks. novērt. zonā maks. novērt.maks. zonā novērt. zonā vid. vid. robežlieluma robežlieluma Ķīpsala maks. Ķīpsala Ķīpsala maks. maks. 2 gada maks. novērt. zonā maks. novērt.maks. zonā novērt. zonā vid. vid. vidējā maks. Salas (200 µg/m (200 maks. maks. Salas Salas maks. novērt. zonā maks. novērt.maks. zonā novērt. zonā koncentrācija vid. vid. Pleskodāle Pleskodāle Pleskodāle maks. 3 maks. ) maks. pārsniegumu pārsniegumu maks. novērt. zonā maks. novērt.maks. zonā novērt. zonā vid. vid. gadā 2020. Vecpilsēta maks. Vecpils. Vecpils. maks. maks. maks. novērt. zonā maks. novērt.maks. zonā novērt. zonā reižu reižu vid. vid. ir ir maks. Brasa augstāka skaits apkaimēs apkaimēs skaits maks. Brasa maks. Brasa maks. novērt. zonā maks. novērt.maks. zonā novērt. zonā vid. vid. Maskavas forštate par Maskavas maks. Mask. f. forštate maks. maks. robežlielumu robežlielumu maks. novērt. zonā maks. novērt.maks. zonā novērt. zonā – vid. norādītas tikai tās tās tikai norādītas vid. Andrejsala Pētersala- Andrejsala Pētersala- maks. Andrejs. Pēters.- maks. maks. maks. novērt. zonā maks. novērt.maks. zonā novērt. zonā (40 µg/m (40 vid. vid. Mūkupurvs Mūkupurvs Mūku- maks. maks. maks.
    [Show full text]
  • Ministry of Transport Republic of Latvia Mobility Plan and Action Program for Riga and Pieriga SEA Report
    Ministry of Transport Republic of Latvia Mobility Plan and Action Program for Riga and Pieriga SEA Report Mobility Plan Riga and Pieriga Tornu iela 4, III C, office no. 203 Riga, LV-1050 Latvia Phone: +371 7 223 144 Fax: +371 7 223 830 INDEX P. ABBREVIATIONS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1. Framework 1 1.2. Project background 1 1.3. Objectives of the RPMP 2 1.4. Strategic Environmental Assessment 3 1.5. SEA Scoping 5 1.6. Consultation meetings 5 1.7. Relation SEA and RPMP 6 1.8. Contents of the report 6 2. LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK 7 2.1. SEA Directive 7 2.2. Other EU regulations 8 2.3. Other international conventions 11 2.4. Latvian regulations 11 2.4.1. SEA regulations 11 2.4.2. Other relevant Latvian regulations 14 2.4.3. Latvian transport development policy documents 16 3. THE CURRENT STATE OF THE ENVIRONMENT IN RIGA AND PIERIGA 17 3.1. Introduction 17 3.2. About Riga and Pieriga 17 3.3. Climate, air, water, soil and the landscape 18 3.3.1. Climate 18 3.3.2. Air 19 3.3.3. Noise 25 3.3.4. Water 30 3.3.5. Landscape and soil 30 3.4. Flora and fauna 31 3.4.1. Biological diversity 31 3.4.2. Special protected areas 31 3.5. Cultural heritage 32 4. ANALYSIS OF CURRENT MOBILITY IN RIGA AND PIERIGA 33 4.1. The study area 33 4.2. Socio-economic characteristics 35 4.3. The policy framework 37 4.4.
    [Show full text]
  • IFF 3Rd Associations Meeting Tampere, Finland 11Th and 12Th of October
    IFF 3 rd Associations Meeting Tampere, Finland 11 th and 12 th of October, 2015 INTERNATIONAL FLOORBALL FEDERATION (IFF) Recognised by the IOC Ordinary member of SportAccord Welcome and Opening Key points of Development and Actions Taken Mr. Tomas Eriksson, IFF President IFF 3rd Association Meeting 11th to 12th of December 2015 INTERNATIONAL FLOORBALL FEDERATION (IFF) Recognised by the IOC Ordinary member of SportAccord Actions taken towards the Olympic Movement and the IOC • During the last two years there has been a lot of lobbying towards the Olympic movement, the NOC’s, the IOC and the Orgnisers of the Multi-Sport Games to secure Floorball participation: • World Games 2021 Birmingham, USA • SEA Games 2017 Malaysia and 2019 Philippines • European Master Games 2019 tbd • Asia Indoor and Marshal Arts Games 2017/2021 • Euro Games 2019 Sochi, Russia • Youth Olympic Games 2018, Buenos Aires, Argentina • FISU Winter Universiade 2021 in Switzerland • Carefully analyzed the Olympic Agenda 2020 recommendations and acted in accordance to fulfil these, in order to be compliant with the IOC requirements. • Good Governance Policy and Ethics Commission in place • Development work with new Countries and Seminars • Developing our Events and the IFF Marketing portfolio • IFF CC Brand Manager • Social Media and streaming INTERNATIONAL FLOORBALL FEDERATION (IFF) Recognised by the IOC Ordinary member of SportAccord IFF Strategic Vision 2009-2020 Half-Time Revision update Vision for the rest of the decade: - Be an active and recognised Partner of the International
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Recreational Pressure on Urban Pine Forest Vegetation in Riga City, Latvia
    Issue 4, Volume 6, 2012 406 The impact of recreational pressure on urban pine forest vegetation in Riga city, Latvia Inga Straupe, Ilze Jankovska, Solvita Rusina, Janis Donis and the well-being of its residents. Urban forests can strongly Abstract: - The article focuses on the analysis of impact of influence the physical/biological environment and mitigate recreational pressure on Myrtillosa type pine forest vegetation many impacts of urban development by moderating climate, in Riga city, Latvia. The composition of the plant conserving energy, carbon dioxide, and water, improving air communities, projective coverage of tree, shrub, herb and quality, controlling rainfall runoff and flooding, lowering noise moss layer as well as the coverage of each separate species and levels, harboring wildlife, and enhancing the attractiveness of plant strategy types has been evaluated. All urban Myrtillosa cities. In an urbanized society, urban green areas are important type pine forests can be divided into two groups – unimpacted as a place for contact with nature. The level of biodiversity of and impacted pine forests. Insignificant changes of forest urban green areas is often surprisingly high, representing environment are preserved in in three plant communities 1 - nature close to where people live. Urban forests can be viewed Pyrola rotundifolia-Pinus sylvestris (Bulli and Mangalsala), 2 as a ’living technology’, a key component of the urban – Pleurozium schreberii-Pinus sylvestris (Bolderaja, Jaunciems and Smerlis), 3 – Calamagrostis epigeios-Pinus infrastructure that helps to maintain a healthy environment for sylvestris (Jugla and Bikernieki). Significant changes and urban dwellers and stability of urban ecosystems [1]-[5]. degradation are observed in other three plant communities of Forests are prominent components of the landscape in most impacted pine forests: 4 – Amelanchier spicata-Pinus urban areas, at the same time urban forests provide a wide sylvestris (Kleisti, Katlakalns, Sampeteris and Ulbroka), 5 – range of recreational and outdoor leisure opportunities.
    [Show full text]