Conservation Not by the Seat of Our Pants

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Conservation Not by the Seat of Our Pants CONTRIBUTED AND INVITED ABSTRACTS for Oral Presentations Arranged by session and program number. Presenting author is underlined and their email address is provided. You may search by author, presenter, session, program number or title. SESSION 1: The Science of Threats: Conservation not by the Seat of Our Pants 1.01 Recorded threats to rare Californian plants Shannon Still1, Nick Jensen2, James André3 1Chicago Botanic Garden, Glencoe, IL, USA, 2Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, Claremont, CA, USA, 3University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA, USA, [email protected] The California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) records 45 threat categories for plants and animals in the state. These threat categories cover factors that may cause a species to be vulnerable. When element occurrence (EO) reports are submitted to the CNDDB, threats are recorded into one of these broad categories. Of the 36,309 plant EO records in CNDDB, 30,342 have a recorded threat and 77% of the species have at least one threat listed for more than 5% of the EOs for the species. The four most common reported threats for the rare Californian flora are road and trail construction and maintenance, grazing, development and the impact from non-native plants. While these categories help us understand the vulnerabilities to rare plants in the state, there is room for improvement in how we categorize and track threats. Of the 1,720 rare Californian taxa used in the study, 22% have no threats recorded. More importantly, 12% of species categorized as seriously threatened in California by California Native Plant Society have no reported threats. This presentation will outline the current threats to the rare Californian flora, highlight areas of strengths in current methods, and discuss some overlooked impacts. 1.02 How right are our threat ranks?: More accurately assessing the threats to California's rare plants Nick Jensen1, Aaron E. Sims2, Shannon Still3 1Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, Claremont, CA, USA, 2California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, CA, USA, 3Chicago Botanic Garden, Glencoe, IL, USA, [email protected] Conservation and government agencies are tasked with managing information on threats to more than 2300 plants recognized as rare in the state of California. Primary challenges include accurately identifying specific threats to and maintaining overall threat level rankings for each taxon. The California Native Plant Society maintains a numerical threat ranking for each rare plant and lists information on specific threats in its Online Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants (CNPS Inventory). The California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) uses 45 specific codes to catalog reported threats to occurrences of the state's rare plants and animals. An analysis of these data enable us to compare threat levels and reported threats in the CNDDB with those reported in the CNPS Inventory. For each taxon, we review the percentage of threatened occurrences indicated by the CNPS Inventory threat rank and compare this to the data included in the CNDDB. This analysis allows us to determine if the rank reported in the CNPS Inventory is supported by data included in the CNDDB. We also identify the primary threat categories reported in the CNDDB and compare these with the threats listed in the CNPS Inventory. This analysis shows that data sharing between CNPS and CNDDB would result in more accurate and up-to-date threat data and rankings. We also provide a model for how these data may be presented in future versions of the CNPS Inventory. 1.03 Management of the cryptic threats of genetic erosion, inbreeding depression, and maladaptation Deborah Rogers1,2 1Center for Natural Lands Management, Temecula, CA, USA, 2University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA, [email protected] Even when the primary objective of wildland ecosystems is protection and conservation of native species and ecological processes, it is challenging to maintain the components that comprise a natural system. Genetic diversity is one of those management challenges - cryptic, always changing, and often only signaling a problem when it has reached a critical point. Plant genomics promises to make more efficient the process of assessing adaptive genetic diversity but we still have large potentials in applying available conservation genetic principles. The objective is to provide illustrations of applying genetic principles to conservation and restoration and to review recent literature for specific examples. Principles will be revisited in the context of rapid climate change, where uncertainty remains of the rationale for moving plant materials in anticipation of specific climatic changes. As genetic study results amass for California native plants, it is clear that more genetic diversity and structuring remains than might be predicted for some rare or listed species. Further, variable ploidy within a species is a genetic feature that is rarely taken into account with restoration projects yet is quite common. Genetic diversity is more important than ever in its role of providing a means to adapt to changing conditions-whether they are natural or anthropogenic in origin. Whether we manage for and support that diversity, or undermine it by lack of consideration or inappropriate application of information or misguided assumptions, can have a substantial impact on the longevity of native plant species and resilience of our wildland ecosystems. 1.04 Phylogenetic diversity and phylogenetic endemism in the California flora Brent Mishler, Bruce Baldwin, David Ackerly University and Jepson Herbaria, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA, [email protected] Biodiversity is usually measured by examining changes in the number of species across a region to identify areas of particularly high species diversity and endemism. However, investigation of species distribution alone misses the full richness of analyses that can result from taking a phylogenetic approach. We are applying a novel suite of phylogenetic tools including two new metrics, Relative Phylogenetic Diversity and Relative Phylogenetic Endemism and a new method called Categorical Analysis of Neo- And Paleo-Endemism (CANAPE) that allows, for the first time, a clear, quantitative distinction between centers of recent and old endemism. Application of this approach to the exceptionally rich vascular flora of California is facilitated by the Consortium of California Herbaria database, the online Jepson eFlora for California, and the wealth of phylogenetic studies that have already been done. A comprehensive phylogeny for California plants is being built, using existing data from Genbank as well as fresh material gathered via an innovative collaboration with citizen scientists from the California Native Plant Society. Spatial analysis of phylogenetic diversity and phylogenetic endemism across the state will then be carried out using appropriate statistical tests. Understanding patterns of biodiversity on the landscape is important for conservation planning, given the need to prioritize efforts in the face of rapid habitat loss and human-induced climate change. These new phylogenetic methods allow assessment of protected lands that is not limited by reliance on species assessment alone and can identify complementary areas of biodiversity that have unique evolutionary histories in need of conservation. 1.05 Using experiments and demographic models to assess rare plant vulnerability to renewable energy development in the California Deserts Kara Moore1, Karen Tanner3, James Andre5, Patrick McIntyre4, Bruce Pavlik2 1University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA, 2BMP Ecosciences, Oakland, CA, USA, 3University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA, 4California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Sacramento, CA, USA, 5University of California Natural Reserve System, Riverside, CA, USA, [email protected] Pressing challenges for plant conservation in the California Deserts are the advance of solar energy development and incomplete understanding of basic plant biology and distributions. How can we rapidly collect the information necessary on species- and site-specific population dynamics to effectively design mitigation and conservation measures? We have developed an integrated approach to assessing the vulnerability of a suite of representative rare plant species in the region. We implemented a prioritized series of demographic and experimental studies over the past four years to identify the types of species, populations, and life stages most vulnerable to impact or prone to conservation efforts. We have found substantial variation in vegetative and sexual reproduction between study populations for several rare plants, including between populations that vary in putative impact by development. For a subset of species, we designed population viability analysis and applied them to identify sensitive vital rates and compare quasi-extinction probabilities under different climate and impact scenarios. By utilizing practical experiments to test for the effects of real or simulated impacts, we have found differences in vital rates between natural and disturbed populations adjacent to and within solar installations and significant negative effects of panel shade on rare plant communities. 1.06 Mechanisms underlying vegetation changes due to redistribution of surface water on a desert bajada Darren Sandquist1, April Newlander1, Miguel Macias1, Aimee Roach1, David Bedford2, David Miller2 1California State University, Fullerton,
Recommended publications
  • The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts
    The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: A County Checklist • First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Somers Bruce Sorrie and Paul Connolly, Bryan Cullina, Melissa Dow Revision • First A County Checklist Plants of Massachusetts: Vascular The A County Checklist First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Massachusetts Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program The Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program (NHESP), part of the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, is one of the programs forming the Natural Heritage network. NHESP is responsible for the conservation and protection of hundreds of species that are not hunted, fished, trapped, or commercially harvested in the state. The Program's highest priority is protecting the 176 species of vertebrate and invertebrate animals and 259 species of native plants that are officially listed as Endangered, Threatened or of Special Concern in Massachusetts. Endangered species conservation in Massachusetts depends on you! A major source of funding for the protection of rare and endangered species comes from voluntary donations on state income tax forms. Contributions go to the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Fund, which provides a portion of the operating budget for the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program. NHESP protects rare species through biological inventory,
    [Show full text]
  • State of New York City's Plants 2018
    STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 Daniel Atha & Brian Boom © 2018 The New York Botanical Garden All rights reserved ISBN 978-0-89327-955-4 Center for Conservation Strategy The New York Botanical Garden 2900 Southern Boulevard Bronx, NY 10458 All photos NYBG staff Citation: Atha, D. and B. Boom. 2018. State of New York City’s Plants 2018. Center for Conservation Strategy. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY. 132 pp. STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 INTRODUCTION 10 DOCUMENTING THE CITY’S PLANTS 10 The Flora of New York City 11 Rare Species 14 Focus on Specific Area 16 Botanical Spectacle: Summer Snow 18 CITIZEN SCIENCE 20 THREATS TO THE CITY’S PLANTS 24 NEW YORK STATE PROHIBITED AND REGULATED INVASIVE SPECIES FOUND IN NEW YORK CITY 26 LOOKING AHEAD 27 CONTRIBUTORS AND ACKNOWLEGMENTS 30 LITERATURE CITED 31 APPENDIX Checklist of the Spontaneous Vascular Plants of New York City 32 Ferns and Fern Allies 35 Gymnosperms 36 Nymphaeales and Magnoliids 37 Monocots 67 Dicots 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report, State of New York City’s Plants 2018, is the first rankings of rare, threatened, endangered, and extinct species of what is envisioned by the Center for Conservation Strategy known from New York City, and based on this compilation of The New York Botanical Garden as annual updates thirteen percent of the City’s flora is imperiled or extinct in New summarizing the status of the spontaneous plant species of the York City. five boroughs of New York City. This year’s report deals with the City’s vascular plants (ferns and fern allies, gymnosperms, We have begun the process of assessing conservation status and flowering plants), but in the future it is planned to phase in at the local level for all species.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversidad Y Distribución De La Familia Asteraceae En México
    Taxonomía y florística Diversidad y distribución de la familia Asteraceae en México JOSÉ LUIS VILLASEÑOR Botanical Sciences 96 (2): 332-358, 2018 Resumen Antecedentes: La familia Asteraceae (o Compositae) en México ha llamado la atención de prominentes DOI: 10.17129/botsci.1872 botánicos en las últimas décadas, por lo que cuenta con una larga tradición de investigación de su riqueza Received: florística. Se cuenta, por lo tanto, con un gran acervo bibliográfico que permite hacer una síntesis y actua- October 2nd, 2017 lización de su conocimiento florístico a nivel nacional. Accepted: Pregunta: ¿Cuál es la riqueza actualmente conocida de Asteraceae en México? ¿Cómo se distribuye a lo February 18th, 2018 largo del territorio nacional? ¿Qué géneros o regiones requieren de estudios más detallados para mejorar Associated Editor: el conocimiento de la familia en el país? Guillermo Ibarra-Manríquez Área de estudio: México. Métodos: Se llevó a cabo una exhaustiva revisión de literatura florística y taxonómica, así como la revi- sión de unos 200,000 ejemplares de herbario, depositados en más de 20 herbarios, tanto nacionales como del extranjero. Resultados: México registra 26 tribus, 417 géneros y 3,113 especies de Asteraceae, de las cuales 3,050 son especies nativas y 1,988 (63.9 %) son endémicas del territorio nacional. Los géneros más relevantes, tanto por el número de especies como por su componente endémico, son Ageratina (164 y 135, respecti- vamente), Verbesina (164, 138) y Stevia (116, 95). Los estados con mayor número de especies son Oaxa- ca (1,040), Jalisco (956), Durango (909), Guerrero (855) y Michoacán (837). Los biomas con la mayor riqueza de géneros y especies son el bosque templado (1,906) y el matorral xerófilo (1,254).
    [Show full text]
  • Biosystematic Studies of Phacelia Capitata
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF J. Steph nShelly for the degree of Master of Science in Botanyand PlantPathologypresented on April 11. 1985. Title: Biosystematic Studies of Phacelia capitata (Hydrophyllaceae). a Species Endemic to Serpentine Soils in Southwestern OregonRedacted for privacy Abstract approved: Renton L. Chambers Phacelia capitataRruckeberg is a member of the Phacelia magellanica polyploidcomplex (species group Magellanicae), a group of wide-ranging, polymorphic perennials in westernNorthAmerica related to the South American P. secunda (= P. magellanica). The purpose of thisproject was to determine, to the extent possible, the interrelationships ofP. capitata within the Magellanicae, using studies of its distribution, cytology, morphology, reproductive biology, and population ecology. Phaceliacapitata is endemic to ultramafic (serpentine and peridotite) outcrops, or similar metamorphic substrates, in Coos, Douglas, and JacksonCounties, southwesternOregon. Field surveys revealed22 extant populations. The species occurs on open serpentine slopes, outcrops, and roadbanks or similarlydisturbed sites, generally in areas with a south to southeast exposure. The nativeplant community with which P. capitata is frequently associated is a Pinus ieffreyi/grass savanna. Soils from five P. capitata sites and two E. corvmbosa sites werechemically analyzed. At six of these locations the soils were derived from fully serpentinized parent materials, and were found to possess low levels of phosphorus and very low calcium/magnesium ratios when compared to an eighth sample from a non-serpentine soil. A soil sample fromone P. capitata site, derived from a metamorphic rock similar in appearance to serpentine, had chemical characteristics intermediatebetween those of serpentine and non-serpentine soils. Chromosome counts from 20 P. capitata populations revealed the existence of diploids (n=11) at 19 of them; tetraploid (n=22) counts were obtained from two populations, oneof these populations also containing diploids.
    [Show full text]
  • The Jepson Manual: Vascular Plants of California, Second Edition Supplement II December 2014
    The Jepson Manual: Vascular Plants of California, Second Edition Supplement II December 2014 In the pages that follow are treatments that have been revised since the publication of the Jepson eFlora, Revision 1 (July 2013). The information in these revisions is intended to supersede that in the second edition of The Jepson Manual (2012). The revised treatments, as well as errata and other small changes not noted here, are included in the Jepson eFlora (http://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/IJM.html). For a list of errata and small changes in treatments that are not included here, please see: http://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/JM12_errata.html Citation for the entire Jepson eFlora: Jepson Flora Project (eds.) [year] Jepson eFlora, http://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/IJM.html [accessed on month, day, year] Citation for an individual treatment in this supplement: [Author of taxon treatment] 2014. [Taxon name], Revision 2, in Jepson Flora Project (eds.) Jepson eFlora, [URL for treatment]. Accessed on [month, day, year]. Copyright © 2014 Regents of the University of California Supplement II, Page 1 Summary of changes made in Revision 2 of the Jepson eFlora, December 2014 PTERIDACEAE *Pteridaceae key to genera: All of the CA members of Cheilanthes transferred to Myriopteris *Cheilanthes: Cheilanthes clevelandii D. C. Eaton changed to Myriopteris clevelandii (D. C. Eaton) Grusz & Windham, as native Cheilanthes cooperae D. C. Eaton changed to Myriopteris cooperae (D. C. Eaton) Grusz & Windham, as native Cheilanthes covillei Maxon changed to Myriopteris covillei (Maxon) Á. Löve & D. Löve, as native Cheilanthes feei T. Moore changed to Myriopteris gracilis Fée, as native Cheilanthes gracillima D.
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plants and a Brief History of the Kiowa and Rita Blanca National Grasslands
    United States Department of Agriculture Vascular Plants and a Brief Forest Service Rocky Mountain History of the Kiowa and Rita Research Station General Technical Report Blanca National Grasslands RMRS-GTR-233 December 2009 Donald L. Hazlett, Michael H. Schiebout, and Paulette L. Ford Hazlett, Donald L.; Schiebout, Michael H.; and Ford, Paulette L. 2009. Vascular plants and a brief history of the Kiowa and Rita Blanca National Grasslands. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS- GTR-233. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 44 p. Abstract Administered by the USDA Forest Service, the Kiowa and Rita Blanca National Grasslands occupy 230,000 acres of public land extending from northeastern New Mexico into the panhandles of Oklahoma and Texas. A mosaic of topographic features including canyons, plateaus, rolling grasslands and outcrops supports a diverse flora. Eight hundred twenty six (826) species of vascular plant species representing 81 plant families are known to occur on or near these public lands. This report includes a history of the area; ethnobotanical information; an introductory overview of the area including its climate, geology, vegetation, habitats, fauna, and ecological history; and a plant survey and information about the rare, poisonous, and exotic species from the area. A vascular plant checklist of 816 vascular plant taxa in the appendix includes scientific and common names, habitat types, and general distribution data for each species. This list is based on extensive plant collections and available herbarium collections. Authors Donald L. Hazlett is an ethnobotanist, Director of New World Plants and People consulting, and a research associate at the Denver Botanic Gardens, Denver, CO.
    [Show full text]
  • Quail-Friendly Plants of North-West Baja California
    RANCHO SANTA ANA BOTANIC GARDEN OCCASIONAL PUBLICATIONS NUMBER 11 QUAIL-FRIENDLY PLANTS OF BAJA CALIFORNIA: AN EXPLORATION OF THE FLORA OF THE SANTO TOMÁS, SAN VICENTE, SAN JACINTO, AND SAN QUINTÍN VALLEYS, CORE HABITAT FOR THE CALIFORNIA QUAIL (CALLIPEPLA CALIFORNICA SUBSP. PLUMBEA) Sula Vanderplank Contributors John Trendler is Curator of Visual Jim Folsom is Director of Huntington Resources at Scripps College and Graphic Botanical Gardens. Jim is the primary and Information Design Consultant. His collaborator on this project. His layout and design work was assisted by assistance with the project development, Winona Bechtle and Nicole Frazer. and the contributions of his employees, made this guide possible. John Macdonald is Photographer at the Barbara Eisenstein is a Native Plant Seed Bank of Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden Consultant from Pasadena. In Gardens. Co-author of “Processing Seeds addition to her participation in field work of California Native Plants”, John has and via image contributions, Barbara contributed seed images for most plants was heavily involved in image selection, in this guide. color correction and formatting. The following people contributed images to this publication after their participation in field work: Cover photos: Quail: (Nueva York, Baja California) Alan Harper © 2011 (alanharper.com) Landscape: (Eréndira, Baja California) Sula Vanderplank Cody Coyotee John Trager is Sean Lahmeyer is This work was made possible by the generous financial assistance of Club La Misión of SanVicente, Baja California, Mexico; the Howard is Curator of Desert Plant Conservation Miller Family Charitable Trust; and the Walter Lantz Foundation. Cost-sharing was graciously provided by Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Conservation Collections at Specialist at the Garden and Huntington Botanical Gardens.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- BIBLIOGRAPHY
    Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- BIBLIOGRAPHY BIBLIOGRAPHY Ackerfield, J., and J. Wen. 2002. A morphometric analysis of Hedera L. (the ivy genus, Araliaceae) and its taxonomic implications. Adansonia 24: 197-212. Adams, P. 1961. Observations on the Sagittaria subulata complex. Rhodora 63: 247-265. Adams, R.M. II, and W.J. Dress. 1982. Nodding Lilium species of eastern North America (Liliaceae). Baileya 21: 165-188. Adams, R.P. 1986. Geographic variation in Juniperus silicicola and J. virginiana of the Southeastern United States: multivariant analyses of morphology and terpenoids. Taxon 35: 31-75. ------. 1995. Revisionary study of Caribbean species of Juniperus (Cupressaceae). Phytologia 78: 134-150. ------, and T. Demeke. 1993. Systematic relationships in Juniperus based on random amplified polymorphic DNAs (RAPDs). Taxon 42: 553-571. Adams, W.P. 1957. A revision of the genus Ascyrum (Hypericaceae). Rhodora 59: 73-95. ------. 1962. Studies in the Guttiferae. I. A synopsis of Hypericum section Myriandra. Contr. Gray Herbarium Harv. 182: 1-51. ------, and N.K.B. Robson. 1961. A re-evaluation of the generic status of Ascyrum and Crookea (Guttiferae). Rhodora 63: 10-16. Adams, W.P. 1973. Clusiaceae of the southeastern United States. J. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc. 89: 62-71. Adler, L. 1999. Polygonum perfoliatum (mile-a-minute weed). Chinquapin 7: 4. Aedo, C., J.J. Aldasoro, and C. Navarro. 1998. Taxonomic revision of Geranium sections Batrachioidea and Divaricata (Geraniaceae). Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 85: 594-630. Affolter, J.M. 1985. A monograph of the genus Lilaeopsis (Umbelliferae). Systematic Bot. Monographs 6. Ahles, H.E., and A.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Baja California, Mexico, and a Vegetation Map of Colonet Mesa Alan B
    Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany Volume 29 | Issue 1 Article 4 2011 Plants of the Colonet Region, Baja California, Mexico, and a Vegetation Map of Colonet Mesa Alan B. Harper Terra Peninsular, Coronado, California Sula Vanderplank Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, Claremont, California Mark Dodero Recon Environmental Inc., San Diego, California Sergio Mata Terra Peninsular, Coronado, California Jorge Ochoa Long Beach City College, Long Beach, California Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Botany Commons, and the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Recommended Citation Harper, Alan B.; Vanderplank, Sula; Dodero, Mark; Mata, Sergio; and Ochoa, Jorge (2011) "Plants of the Colonet Region, Baja California, Mexico, and a Vegetation Map of Colonet Mesa," Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: Vol. 29: Iss. 1, Article 4. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol29/iss1/4 Aliso, 29(1), pp. 25–42 ’ 2011, Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden PLANTS OF THE COLONET REGION, BAJA CALIFORNIA, MEXICO, AND A VEGETATION MAPOF COLONET MESA ALAN B. HARPER,1 SULA VANDERPLANK,2 MARK DODERO,3 SERGIO MATA,1 AND JORGE OCHOA4 1Terra Peninsular, A.C., PMB 189003, Suite 88, Coronado, California 92178, USA ([email protected]); 2Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, 1500 North College Avenue, Claremont, California 91711, USA; 3Recon Environmental Inc., 1927 Fifth Avenue, San Diego, California 92101, USA; 4Long Beach City College, 1305 East Pacific Coast Highway, Long Beach, California 90806, USA ABSTRACT The Colonet region is located at the southern end of the California Floristic Province, in an area known to have the highest plant diversity in Baja California.
    [Show full text]
  • Flowering Plants of California
    A MANUAL OF THE \ Flowering- Plants of California- WILLIS LINN I JEPSON L- UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS Berkeley and Los Angeles • 1970 ■, 834 HYDROPHYLLACEA:fu BORAGINACEAE 835 ia~e.-~on)tane, 4000 to 6500 ft.: s._ Sierra Nevada (Shadequarter Mt. TRASKIAEBrand. Similar to var. niveum; sepals black-glandular; corolla 2½ u are . o. ; San Emigdio, San Gabnel, San Bernardino, Santa Ana and to 3 lines long.-Santa Inez Mts.; Santa Catalina Isl. (E. traskiae Eastw.) San Jacmto mountains; Palomar Mt.; Cuyamaca Mts.; s. to L. Cal. 11. TRICARDIA Torr. 10. ERIODfCTYON Benth Perennial herb, the leaves mostly in a basal rosette. Flowers purplish, rather few in loose spicate racemes. Sepals almost distinct, very dissimilar, , re~~~f~tse;it~or~~~: 0~;~ ter;:s~~:;:ati tnnately veined, fi~ely the 3 outer large and cordate, becoming much enlarged, scarious and reticu­ ~:~~:i:· late-veiny in fruit, the 2 inner linear. Corolla broad-campanulate, slightly g~~~m:~::~~if~:::/~1: ~:r:;~~t\i\~ch~~~b~?~i:onfrr~~~:~~ciu!tet;r~i~~'. contracted at the mouth, deciduous, the 10 narrow internal appendages free 1 from the filaments. Stamens unequal, equally inserted on the lower part of ;~:~eY; ~!:s~fe~at~t~r~hen~~~l; of/heuU~ro~~~~l~~:rle ~!?!~taft;?:~~:r~~t the corolla-tube. Ovary 1-celled, glabrous; ovules 4 on each placenta; style 2-cleft. Capsule thin-walled, I-celled. (Greek tri, three, and cardia, heart, l~~~tfic~it1;!i~~hi:n t~:pfk\daf,t{i~s 2l~!~~~t~a~~p!~~::~i~:1t;i{£r~:~~~ referring to the 3 outer sepals.) 0 8 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Flora of Greater San Quintín, Baja California, Mexico (2005–2010)," Aliso: a Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: Vol
    Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany Volume 29 | Issue 2 Article 2 2011 The lorF a of Greater San Quintín, Baja California, Mexico (2005–2010) Sula E. Vanderplank Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, Claremont Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso Part of the Biodiversity Commons, and the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Vanderplank, Sula E. (2011) "The Flora of Greater San Quintín, Baja California, Mexico (2005–2010)," Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: Vol. 29: Iss. 2, Article 2. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol29/iss2/2 Aliso, 29(2), pp. 65–103 ’ 2011, Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden THE FLORA OF GREATER SAN QUINTI´N, BAJA CALIFORNIA, MEXICO (2005–2010) SULA E. VANDERPLANK Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, 1500 North College Avenue, Claremont, California 91711-3157, USA ABSTRACT The plants of San Quintı´n (Baja California, Mexico) were documented through intensive fieldwork and collection of herbarium specimens to create a checklist of species. The region is located near the southernmost extent of the California Floristic Province, and the flora is influenced by the adjacent desert to the south. A total of 435 plant taxa were documented, of which 82% are native plants. Almost one in three native plant taxa in Greater San Quintı´n is a sensitive species, here documented as rare and/or locally endemic, and many taxa have yet to be evaluated fully for rarity and threats. Four major habitats were identified, and a checklist is presented for each. Shell middens and vernal pools represent micro-habitats with unique species that also warrant conservation consideration.
    [Show full text]
  • Dudleya Anthonyi Rose Como Taxón En La Categoría De Amenazada De
    Propuesta preparada por: Sociedad de Plantas Nativas de Baja California para la inclusión de Dudleya anthonyi Rose © Vanderplank,2009. como taxón en la categoría de Amenazada de la NORMA OFICIAL MEXICANA NOM-059-SEMARNAT Elaborado por: Gabriela Corona (Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, México) Matt Guilliams (University of California, Berkeley, EE. UU. ) Sula Vanderplank (Botanical Research Institute of Texas, EE.UU.) Con el apoyo financiero de: Jiji Foundation 31 de enero 2014 EVALUACIÓN DEL RIESGO DE EXTINCIÓN DE Dudleya anthonyi Rose DE ACUERDO AL NUMERAL 5.7 DE LA NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010 Indice 5.7.1 Datos generales del responsable de la propuesta. ................................................................. 3 5.7.2 Nombre científico válido. ...................................................................................................... 3 5.7.3 Mapa del área de distribución geográfica de la especie o población en cuestión................... 5 5.7.4 Justificación técnica científica de la propuesta. ...................................................................... 7 a) Análisis diagnóstico del estado actual de las poblaciones y su hábitat. ................................... 7 b) Relevancia ecológica, taxonómica, cultural y económica. ....................................................... 8 c) Factores de riesgo reales y potenciales para la especie o población, así como la evaluación de la importancia relativa de cada uno. ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]