Broch06-E.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Broch06-E.Pdf Inter-Parliamentary Union The Inter-Parliamentary Union is a leading advocate of democracy. It promotes and strengthens the institution of parliament, helping parliamentarians to represent their constituents – freely, safely and effectively. A Global Voice National parliaments are the cor- tional tensions and contribute to the peace and prosperity of the world. nerstone of democracy. Parliamen- This founding idea proved its worth tarians are ultimately responsible in some of the darkest hours of the th for the enactment of sound law 20 century – and is more relevant than ever today. and supervision of the process The IPU is continually active behind of government. the scenes in the world’s hot spots, helping to avoid or resolve confl ict and The Inter-Parliamentary Union – to nurture fl edgling parliaments. IPU – is a global voice and facilitator It offers the world’s 40,000 strong of multilateral contacts for parliamen- community of parliamentarians a col- tarians from over 140 national parlia- lective voice in international affairs. ments. It is the only organization of its It is an increasingly important kind with this global legitimacy. bridge between parliamentarians and It is an independent, self-govern- international decision-making in fi elds ing body, largely fi nanced by member such as peace-building or global parliaments. Its President and Execu- commerce. tive Committee are elected by member It has been instrumental in driving delegates. the greater involvement of women in The organization was established the parliamentary process. in 1889 by enlightened political think- It watches over the rights and ers who believed that better contact liberty of parliamentarians in democra- between the parliaments of different cies where their freedom to speak and nations would help defuse interna- act is at risk. IPU at Work Members the geographic and political make-up Over 140 national parliaments are of the IPU and is also chaired by the members of the IPU. National delega- President. It takes the administrative tions refl ect the prevailing balance in lead within the organization, prepar- multi-party parliaments. IPU staffi ng ing recommendations for action by and programs are fi nanced by mem- the Governing Council. ber contributions from public funds. Assembly Governing Council The Assembly of the IPU is convened The Governing Council, the plenary twice each year to enable multilateral policy-making body of the IPU chaired exchanges between member coun- by the President, adopts programs, try delegates. The agenda of each sets budgets and rules on member- Assembly refl ects both current and ship. It is also responsible for elect- on-going international affairs. Stand- ing the President and the Secretary ing Committees – on International General. Peace and Security, Sustainable Development, Financing and Trade, Executive Committee and Democracy and Human Rights The Executive Committee is composed – report to the Assembly and prepare of 15 member delegates who refl ect resolutions for adoption. Meeting of Women Parliamentarians Women parliamentarians represent- ing the IPU membership meet in con- junction with the Assemblies to dis- . cuss topics relating to the status of . women. This group was established . in 1978 and became part of the gov- . erning structure of the IPU in 1999. 3 . Panel debates World Conference of Speakers The Assemblies provide an oppor- of Parliaments tunity for less formal panel events The Second World Conference of Speakers that bring together parliamentarians, of Parliaments took place at the United experts and journalists to discuss Nations in New York in September 2005. topics ranging from child traffi cking to This landmark event, organized by the IPU, the question of nationality and state- brought together the Speakers of the world’s lessness. parliaments. In a formal declaration, it drew attention to the global nature of many of the challenges democracy faces and the need for national parliaments to participate more fully in the formulation of global responses. æ Democracy is and will remain a fragile concept in many parts of the world, often perilously fl awed in practice. Even where it is well established, democratic institutions are struggling to adapt to the huge new challenges inherent in globalization. The World Conferen- ce of Speakers of Parliament in New York drew attention to the emergence of a potentially dangerous “democracy gap”. As national parliaments lose infl uence, power moves away from the people. It would be catastrophic to accept any of this. The spread of democracy is the start of a journey – never an end state in itself. And parliamentary institutions throughout history have proved remarkably resilient. What is clear, however, is that many of the perceived threats to our democratic well-being – be they from terrorism or world trade – can no longer be solved within the framework of individual nation states. The fi rst duty of all parliaments is to deliver the basic building blocks of democracy – representation and ac- countability. The strong must help the weak in this respect and never accept failure. Beyond this, the challenge of the 21st century is for parliamentarians everywhere to be increasingly international in outlook and capability in order to serve the interests of their constituents. The goal of the Inter-Parliamentary Union is to help achieve this. Pier Ferdinando Casini President of the Inter-Parliamentary Union Promoting Democracy æ For the founding fathers of the IPU, world peace and parliamentary democ- racy were critically interlinked. The work of the organization continues to re- fl ect this belief. It has played a key role in the development of generally accepted democratic principles of governance and international standards for free and fair elections and the functioning of multiparty systems. Its Declaration on Criteria for Free and Fair Elections and Universal Declaration on Democ- racy are fundamental components of modern parliamentary thinking. The collective expertise of IPU members is a unique asset in the spread of sound democratic practice. They provide advice, guidance and many forms of technical support for freedom of speech. But the applica- countries in political transition or in tion of these principles is still far from post-confl ict situations. universal. In recent years, the IPU has Some countries fear the freedom played an active part in the develop- of expression that is fundamental to ment of parliamentary systems in the principle of parliamentary debate. over 50 countries, including Afghani- Almost daily, courageous parliamen- stan, Albania, Equatorial Guinea, Iraq, tarians put themselves at risk by Nigeria, Pakistan, Rwanda, Sri Lanka, speaking out on behalf of their con- . East Timor and Uruguay. stituents. The IPU actively supports . Some of the organization’s most those who have been persecuted or . important work takes place quietly jailed for their beliefs. behind the scenes when negotia- The IPU has taken a global lead on . tions between executive branches of the involvement of women in the par- . government have stalled. Patient, liamentary process. Many barriers to 5 . constructive contact between fellow equality fell in the second half of the parliamentarians has often brought 20th century as women began to take results when the world’s headline writ- their place alongside men at all levels ers held out little hope of progress. of government. But global statistics Democracy is a universal concept show that 84% of the world’s parlia- in the sense that all parts of the elec- mentarians are men. In some parts torate should have equal rights of rep- of the world, progress towards gender resentation in parliament and enjoy equality has barely begun. IPU and the United Nations æ By virtue of its global reach and The growing concentration of pow- democracy-building mandate, the IPU er in the executive branch of govern- is an increasingly important player in ment and international institutions is the system of international relations one consequence of globalization that centred on the United Nations. concerns many parliamentarians and The IPU strongly endorses the role limits their ability to represent con- of the UN in promoting and sustain- stituent interests. ing the principles of democracy. But The World Conference of Speak- it also stands apart in the sense that ers of Parliament emphasized the it represents parliaments and is not, growing importance of bringing a par- like the UN, an inter-governmental or- liamentary dimension to the work of ganization. the UN and its belief that international . 6 cooperation should refl ect input from across the political spectrum. “Parliaments are the principal reposi- The IPU’s Permanent Observer tory of democratic legitimacy. Using status at the UN, granted in 2002, your legislative powers and your and its exceptional right to circulate democratic mandate, you can serve documents to the General Assembly as genuine ‘tribunes of the people’ are important factors in enabling this. across traditional frontiers. You The IPU works closely with the UN have a unique role to play in bringing and specialized bodies such as UNDP, institutions such as the United UNHCR, OHCHR, UNAIDS, UNICEF and Nations closer to the peoples they UNDAW. are meant to serve.” Kofi Annan Secretary-General of the United Nations IPU and the World Trade Organization æ The huge shifts in macro econo- – which directly impact the lives of mics and the dynamics of internat- millions of people in both the devel- ional trade that have occurred in the oped and developing worlds – largely last twenty five years have resulted by-pass parliamentary scrutiny. in new global decision-making and The IPU began a dialogue with the control mechanisms. While necessary WTO in 2001 to address this situa- and in most respects benefi cial, they tion. This led to the establishment, to- are controversial. gether with the European Parliament, The World Trade Organization is of a Conference on the WTO, now held one inter-governmental body that is annually.
Recommended publications
  • The Nobel Peace Prize
    TITLE: Learning From Peace Makers OVERVIEW: Students examine The Dalai Lama as a Nobel Laureate and compare / contrast his contributions to the world with the contributions of other Nobel Laureates. SUBJECT AREA / GRADE LEVEL: Civics and Government 7 / 12 STATE CONTENT STANDARDS / BENCHMARKS: -Identify, research, and clarify an event, issue, problem or phenomenon of significance to society. -Gather, use, and evaluate researched information to support analysis and conclusions. OBJECTIVES: The student will demonstrate the ability to... -know and understand The Dalai Lama as an advocate for peace. -research and report the contributions of others who are recognized as advocates for peace, such as those attending the Peace Conference in Portland: Aldolfo Perez Esquivel, Robert Musil, William Schulz, Betty Williams, and Helen Caldicott. -compare and contrast the contributions of several Nobel Laureates with The Dalai Lama. MATERIALS: -Copies of biographical statements of The Dalai Lama. -List of Nobel Peace Prize winners. -Copy of The Dalai Lama's acceptance speech for the Nobel Peace Prize. -Bulletin board for display. PRESENTATION STEPS: 1) Students read one of the brief biographies of The Dalai Lama, including his Five Point Plan for Peace in Tibet, and his acceptance speech for receiving the Nobel Prize for Peace. 2) Follow with a class discussion regarding the biography and / or the text of the acceptance speech. 3) Distribute and examine the list of Nobel Peace Prize winners. 4) Individually, or in cooperative groups, select one of the Nobel Laureates (give special consideration to those coming to the Portland Peace Conference). Research and prepare to report to the class who the person was and why he / she / they won the Nobel Prize.
    [Show full text]
  • Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU)
    Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU) March 16, 2021 In News: Duarte Pacheco, President of Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU), Geneva, was present in Rajya Sabha on Monday to observe the proceedings of the House. About Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU) Headquarters: Geneva, Switzerland. Genesis of the IPU The organization was established in 1889 as the Inter- Parliamentary Congress. Its founders were statesmen Frédéric Passy of France and William Randal Cremer of the United Kingdom. The Inter-Parliamentary Union was created in 1889, in an era when there were no established means for governments or parliaments to work together internationally. The Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU) formed in 1889, is one of the oldest and largest international Parliamentary body consisting of more than 179 Members. The IPU was instrumental in setting up the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague in 1899, and its calls for an international institution linking governments helped lay the foundations for the creation of the League of Nations in 1919 and the United Nations in 1945. Historic first meeting: The historic meeting was organized at the Grand Hotel in Paris on 31 October 1888. International attendance: This time the meeting was attended by 55 French and 28 British MPs, as well as 5 Italians and 1 representative each from the parliaments of Belgium, Denmark, Hungary, Liberia, Spain and the United States. Objective: The Inter-Parliamentary Union is an international organization of national parliaments. Its primary purpose is to promote democratic governance, accountability, and cooperation among its members. Members: As of 2020, the national parliaments of 179 countries are members of the IPU, while 13 regional parliamentary assemblies are associate members.
    [Show full text]
  • Liste Der Nobelpreisträger
    Physiologie Wirtschafts- Jahr Physik Chemie oder Literatur Frieden wissenschaften Medizin Wilhelm Henry Dunant Jacobus H. Emil von Sully 1901 Conrad — van ’t Hoff Behring Prudhomme Röntgen Frédéric Passy Hendrik Antoon Theodor Élie Ducommun 1902 Emil Fischer Ronald Ross — Lorentz Mommsen Pieter Zeeman Albert Gobat Henri Becquerel Svante Niels Ryberg Bjørnstjerne 1903 William Randal Cremer — Pierre Curie Arrhenius Finsen Bjørnson Marie Curie Frédéric John William William Mistral 1904 Iwan Pawlow Institut de Droit international — Strutt Ramsay José Echegaray Adolf von Henryk 1905 Philipp Lenard Robert Koch Bertha von Suttner — Baeyer Sienkiewicz Camillo Golgi Joseph John Giosuè 1906 Henri Moissan Theodore Roosevelt — Thomson Santiago Carducci Ramón y Cajal Albert A. Alphonse Rudyard \Ernesto Teodoro Moneta 1907 Eduard Buchner — Michelson Laveran Kipling Louis Renault Ilja Gabriel Ernest Rudolf Klas Pontus Arnoldson 1908 Metschnikow — Lippmann Rutherford Eucken Paul Ehrlich Fredrik Bajer Theodor Auguste Beernaert Guglielmo Wilhelm Kocher Selma 1909 — Marconi Ostwald Ferdinand Lagerlöf Paul Henri d’Estournelles de Braun Constant Johannes Albrecht Ständiges Internationales 1910 Diderik van Otto Wallach Paul Heyse — Kossel Friedensbüro der Waals Allvar Maurice Tobias Asser 1911 Wilhelm Wien Marie Curie — Gullstrand Maeterlinck Alfred Fried Victor Grignard Gerhart 1912 Gustaf Dalén Alexis Carrel Elihu Root — Paul Sabatier Hauptmann Heike Charles Rabindranath 1913 Kamerlingh Alfred Werner Henri La Fontaine — Robert Richet Tagore Onnes Theodore
    [Show full text]
  • International and Regional Organizations Lector:Bobonazar Karimzoda First Term, 2-Credits, Course: 3 a Specialty: 1-230101 International Relations
    Correct answers are option A THE ACADEMY OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION UNDER THE PRESIDENT OF REPUBLIC OF TAJIKISTAN Faculty of International Relations Department of Diplomacy and International Relations Subject: International and Regional Organizations Lector:Bobonazar Karimzoda First term, 2-credits, course: 3 A Specialty: 1-230101 International Relations @1.Which two security organizations dominated the Cold War Era? $A) The North Atlantic Treaty Organization and the Warsaw Pact; $B) The Security Council and NATO; $C) Trusteeship Council; $D) UN and Commonwealth of Nations; $E) None of these; @2.Anthony Lake, best known as Tony Lake is the executive director of _________for 2013. $A) United Nations Children`s Fund (UNICEF); $B) International Health Organization; $C) International Atomic Energy Agency; $D) International Labor Organization; $E) Food and Agriculture Organization; @3.Which of the following is not associated with the UNO? $A) ASEAN; $B) WHO; $C) ILO; $D) EU; $E) None of these; @4.The chairmanship/presidency of the UN Security Council rotates among the Council Members __________. $A) every month; $B) every 3 month; $C) every 2 year; $D) every year; $E) every 7 month; @5.Which of these organization has been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize three times? $A) International Committee of the Red Cross; $B) United Nations Organization; $C) Transparency International; $D) Amnesty International; $E) All of these; @6.Which of the following organization works towards ending grave abuses of human rights? $A) Amnesty International; $B) United Nations Organization; $C) Transparency International; $D) International Red Cross; $E) NGO; @7.Which of the following publishes the Red List of Threatened Species? $A) IUCN - International Union for Conservation of Nature; $B) UNEP - United Nations Environment Program; $C) WWF - World Wildlife Fund; $D) WNO - Welsh National Opera; $E) none of the above; @8.United Nations Environment Program was established in ____.
    [Show full text]
  • The International Peace Movement 1815-1914: an Outline
    The international peace movement 1815-1914: an outline Script of an online lecture given by Guido Grünewald on 9 June 2020* I will try to give an outline of the emergence and development of an international peace movement during its first 100 years. Since English is not my mother tongue and I haven’t spoken it for a longer time I will follow a written guideline in order to finish the job in the short time I have. The first peace organisations emerged in America and in Britain. This was no coincidence; while on the European continent after the end of the Napoleonic Wars restoration took over there were evolving democracies in the anglo-Saxon countries and a kind of peace tradition as for example carried by the quakers who renounced any kind of war. For those early societies the question if a war could be defensive and therefore justified was from the beginning a thorny issue. The New York Peace Sciety founded by merchant David Low Dodge followed a fundamental pacifism rejecting all kind of wars while the Massachussets Peace Society (its founder was unitarian minister Noah Worcester) gathered both fundamental pacifists and those who accepted strictly defensive wars. With about 50 other groups both organisations merged to become the American Peace Society in 1828. The London Peace Society had an interesting top-tier approach: its leadership had to pursue a fundamental pacifist course while ordinary members were allowed to have different ideas about defensive wars. On the European continent some short-lived peace organisations emerged only later. The formation of those first societies occured under the influence of Quakers (one of the 3 historic peace churches which renounced violence) and of Christians who were convinced that war was murderous and incompatible with Christian values.
    [Show full text]
  • M15224211I* SESSIONE AUTUNNALE Livello Superiore
    Codice del candidato: Državni izpitni center *M15224211I* SESSIONE AUTUNNALE Livello superiore Prova d'esame 1 A) Comprensione di testi scritti B) Conoscenza e uso della lingua Mercoledì, 26 agosto 2015 / 60 minuti (35 + 25) Materiali e sussidi consentiti: Al candidato è consentito l'uso della penna stilografica o della penna a sfera. Al candidato viene consegnata una scheda di valutazione. MATURITÀ GENERALE INDICAZIONI PER IL CANDIDATO Leggete con attenzione le seguenti indicazioni. Non aprite la prova d'esame e non iniziate a svolgerla prima del via dell'insegnante preposto. Incollate o scrivete il vostro numero di codice negli spazi appositi su questa pagina in alto a destra e sulla scheda di valutazione. La prova d'esame si compone di due parti, denominate A e B. Il tempo a disposizione per l'esecuzione dell'intera prova è di 60 minuti: vi consigliamo di dedicare 35 minuti alla risoluzione della parte A, e 25 minuti a quella della parte B. La prova d'esame contiene 2 esercizi per la parte A e 2 esercizi per la parte B. Potete conseguire fino a un massimo di 20 punti nella parte A e 27 punti nella parte B, per un totale di 47 punti. È prevista l'assegnazione di 1 punto per ciascuna risposta esatta. Scrivete le vostre risposte negli spazi appositamente previsti all'interno della prova utilizzando la penna stilografica o la penna a sfera. Scrivete in modo leggibile e ortograficamente corretto. In caso di errore, tracciate un segno sulla risposta scorretta e scrivete accanto ad essa quella corretta. Alle risposte e alle correzioni scritte in modo illeggibile verranno assegnati 0 punti.
    [Show full text]
  • For Human Rights and for Fundamental Freedoms for All, and the Formal And
    Inter-parliamentary Union – Claudia Kissling 1 Inter-parliamentary Union – Claudia Kissling 2 Inter-parliamentary Union – Claudia Kissling 1. Introduction This article is based on extensive research into historical and legal aspects of the 120 years' history of the Inter-Parliamentary Union (Kissling 2006). Its goal is twofold: on the one hand in order to cover the history of the IPU, including its political and legal work, its related success stories and failures in influencing international and global politics, and, closely linked, its political and legal relevance from its early years until now. A special focus in this regard is put on the discussion of global democracy and world parliamentary ideas within the Union and among its members in a historic perspective, and the handling of the question of whether the IPU itself would qualify for and would be willing to strive for transforming itself into something like a global parliament. On the other hand, this article looks at the (internal) democratic features and democratization processes within the Union as an inter-parliamentary organization active at the global level and measures them by resorting to the International Democracy Watch and its macro-indicators appointment, democracy at the national level, input legitimacy, participation, control, inter-state democracy, supra-nationalism, power limitation, human rights, and output legitimacy. 2. The historical development of the IPU and its role in shaping international politics and institutions 2.1. The Purpose of Founding an Inter-Parliamentary
    [Show full text]
  • List of Nobel Leaureates in Peace Year Laureates Country
    List of Nobel Leaureates in Peace Year Laureates Country Rationale Henry Dunant Switzerland For his role in founding the International Committee of the Red Cross "For being one of the main founders of the Inter-Parliamentary Union and also the main organizer 1901 Frédéric Passy France of the first Universal Peace Congress" Élie Ducommun "For his role as the first honorary secretary of the International Peace Bureau" 1902 Charles Albert Gobat Switzerland "For his role as the first Secretary General of the Inter-Parliamentary Union" 1903 William Randal Cremer United Kingdom "For his role as the 'first father' of the Inter-Parliamentary Union" 1904 Institute of International Law Belgium "For its efforts as an unofficial body to formulate the general principles of the science of international law" 1905 Bertha von Suttner Austria-Hungary For writing Lay Down Your Arms and contributing to the creation of the Prize "For his successful mediation to end the Russo-Japanese war and for his interest in arbitration, 1906 Theodore Roosevelt United States having provided the Hague arbitration court with its very first case" Ernesto Teodoro Moneta Italy "For his work as a key leader of the Italian peace movement" 1907 Louis Renault France "For his work as a leading French international jurist and a member of the Permanent Court of Arbitration at The Hague" Klas Pontus Arnoldson Sweden "For his work as founder of the Swedish Peace and Arbitration League" "For being the foremost peace advocate in Scandinavia, combining work in the Inter-Parliamentary 1908
    [Show full text]
  • Environments Shoreditchthe Star
    Spring 2009 Fifth Issue: Environments ShoreditchThe Star A Themed Newspaper Created by 9-11 Year-Olds in Shoreditch Environments H Charles Darwin H More Light, More Power H Eco-Web H Climate Change H Building Green H Food Commissioned and developed by Shoreditch Trust In partnership with Burbage, Randal Cremer, Queensbridge & St Monica’s RC Schools Credits & Contents ShoreditchThe Star Introduction ShoreditchThe Star Credits Contents Dylan Potter Editor & Project Co-ordinator Jacqui Roberts PART 1 INTRODUCTIONS Project Manager 2 Credits & Contents Chilli Pepper Creative 3 Editor’s Introduction Graphic Design 4 A Green Encyclopedia Additional Contributors to PART 2 EVOLUTION! Workshops & Content 11 The Theory of Evolution: An Introduction Ashley McCormick & Claire Toogood 12 An Illustrated Evolutionary Timeline EDItor’s Building Exploratory 16 Charlies Darwin: His Life & Work Andrew Waugh 18 The Adventures of Charles Darwin Waugh Thistleton Architects INTRODUCTION Dr Nicola Dempsey PART 3 ENVIRONMENTS Oxford Institute for Sustainable Development at Oxford Brookes University 23 Learning from Our Ancestors Our planet Earth has been around for a very long time Today we are experiencing another climate change. When Roy Stephenson & Jon Cotton & 26 Learning from the Iron Age Way of Life – around 4.5 billion years, scientists believe. Unlike all the we talk about climate change (or global warming) we are other planets in our Solar System – and, as far as we know, talking about an overall rise in global temperature. This rise Dan Nesbitt & Glynn Davis 27 More Light, More Power: Museum of London in our galaxy – ours is the only planet to have developed in temperature will change many things about our planet The Industrial Age in Shoreditch life.
    [Show full text]
  • Keeping Missions in Africa- a Focus on Sudan
    International Journal of Public Administration and Management Research (IJPAMR), Vol. 5, No. 2, August, 2019. Available online at http://www.rcmss.com/index.php/ijpamr; www.academix.ng ISSN: 2350-2231(E) ISSN: 2346-7215 (P) Akwara, Azalahu F.; Akpan, Nse Etim; Ibiam, Egwu & Arua ,Christopher, 2019, 5(2):17-34 THE CHALLENGES AND PROSPECTS OF UNITED NATIONS PEACE- KEEPING MISSIONS IN AFRICA- A FOCUS ON SUDAN 1Akwara, Azalahu F., 2Akpan, Nse Etim, 3Ibiam, Egwu Okechukwu, & 4Arua, Christopher 1,3&4Department of Political Science, Alex Ekwueme Federal University Ndufu Alike Ikwo. Abakaliki, Ebonyi State, Nigeria. 1([email protected]; +2348038032062; +2348072412414) (Corresponding author). 2Department of Political Science, Federal University Wukari, Taraba State, Nigeria. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT The political evolution of Africa is replete with conflicts which have unfortunately gone beyond the capabilities of the continent to resolve without resort to foreign assistance especially in the critical field of military assistance. This study discusses the concept and practice of the United Nations peacekeeping missions in Africa, the challenges facing such operations as well as the prospects of resolving them. It conceptualizes peacekeeping, adopts the collective security paradigm in discussing the changing operational environment that has transformed UN traditional peacekeeping operations to the contemporary peacekeeping methods and the challenges that has led to half-baked results in such African operations. The study highlights the challenges and the prospects of these operations, recommends an improvement in the quality of preparation, planning, monitoring and evaluation of the processes by the Security Council, adoption of clear and actionable mandates by the UN, proper coordination between the Security Council and countries contributing troops, good risk analysis and transparency across the chain of command among others as necessary steps to address the challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Nobel Laureates 1
    List of Nobel laureates 1 List of Nobel laureates The Nobel Prizes (Swedish: Nobelpriset, Norwegian: Nobelprisen) are awarded annually by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, the Swedish Academy, the Karolinska Institute, and the Norwegian Nobel Committee to individuals and organizations who make outstanding contributions in the fields of chemistry, physics, literature, peace, and physiology or medicine.[1] They were established by the 1895 will of Alfred Nobel, which dictates that the awards should be administered by the Nobel Foundation. Another prize, the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences, was established in 1968 by the Sveriges Riksbank, the central bank of Sweden, for contributors to the field of economics.[2] Each prize is awarded by a separate committee; the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences awards the Prizes in Physics, Chemistry, and Economics, the Karolinska Institute awards the Prize in Physiology or Medicine, and the Norwegian Nobel Committee awards the Prize in Peace.[3] Each recipient receives a medal, a diploma and a monetary award that has varied throughout the years.[2] In 1901, the recipients of the first Nobel Prizes were given 150,782 SEK, which is equal to 7,731,004 SEK in December 2007. In 2008, the winners were awarded a prize amount of 10,000,000 SEK.[4] The awards are presented in Stockholm in an annual ceremony on December 10, the anniversary of Nobel's death.[5] As of 2011, 826 individuals and 20 organizations have been awarded a Nobel Prize, including 69 winners of the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences.[6] Four Nobel laureates were not permitted by their governments to accept the Nobel Prize.
    [Show full text]
  • A Peace Odyssey Commemorating the 100Th Anniversary of the Awarding of the Nobel Peace Prize
    CALL FOR PAPERS HOFSTRA CULTURAL CENTER in cooperation with THE PEACE HISTORY SOCIETY presents 2001: A Peace Odyssey Commemorating the 100th Anniversary of the Awarding of the Nobel Peace Prize AN INTERDISCIPLINARY CONFERENCE THURSDAY, FRIDAY, SATURDAY NOVEMBER 8, 9, 10, 2001 HEMPSTEAD, NEW YORK 11549 JEAN HENRI DUNANT, FRÉDÉRIC PASSY, ÉLIE RALPH BUNCHE, LÉON JOUHAUX, ALBERT SCHWEITZER, DUCOMMUN, CHARLES ALBERT GOBAT, SIR WILLIAM GEORGE CATLETT MARSHALL, THE OFFICE OF THE RANDAL CREMER, INSTITUT DE DROIT INTERNATIONAL, UNITED NATIONS HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR REFUGEES, BARONESSPROBERTHAPACESOPHIE ETFELICITA VON SUTTNER, LESTER BOWLES PEARSON, GEORGES PIRE, PHILIP J. NÉEFCOUNTESSRATERNITATEKINSKY VON CHINIC UND TETTAU, NOEL-BAKER, ALBERT JOHN LUTULI, DAG HJALMAR THEODOREENTIUMROOSEVELT, ERNESTO TEODORO MONETA, AGNE CARL HAMMARSKJÖLD, LINUS CARL PAULING, LOUISGRENAULT, KLAS PONTUS ARNOLDSON, FREDRIK COMITÉ INTERNATIONAL DE LA CROIX ROUGE, LIGUE BAJER(F, ORAUGUSTE THE PMEACEARIE FRANŸOIS AND BEERNAERT, PAUL DES SOCIÉTÉS DE LA CROIX-ROUGE, MARTIN LUTHER ROTHERHOOD OF EN HENRIB BENJAMIN BALLUET, BARONM D)E CONSTANT DE KING JR., UNITED NATIONS CHILDREN'S FUND, RENÉ REBECQUE D'ESTOURNELLE DE CONSTANT, THE CASSIN, THE INTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANIZATION, PERMANENT INTERNATIONAL PEACE BUREAU, TOBIAS N ORMAN ERNEST BORLAUG, WILLY BRANDT, MICHAEL CAREL ASSER, ALFRED HERMANN FRIED, HENRY A. KISSINGER, LE DUC THO, SEÁN E LIHU ROOT, HENRI LA FONTAINE, MACBRIDE, EISAKU SATO, ANDREI COMITÉ INTERNATIONAL DE LA DMITRIEVICH SAKHAROV, B ETTY CROIX ROUGE, THOMAS
    [Show full text]