Bike Action Plan: If You Build It, “Wheel” They Come?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Bike Action Plan: If You Build It, “Wheel” They Come? BIKE ACTION PLAN: IF YOU BUILD IT, “WHEEL” THEY COME? PENNSYLVANIA CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION 2015 ANNUAL CONFERENCE - EDUCATIONAL SESSION Jennifer Barr, AICP Rebecca Collins, LEED AP O+M Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority Overview SESSION OUTLINE Bike Action Plan: If you buildACCESSIBILITY it, “Wheel” they come? • Overview • Trends • Bikes TO Transit • Bikes AT Transit • Bikes ON Transit • Q & A 2 Overview CYCLE-TRANSIT PLAN 3 Overview BIKE ACTION PLAN FRAMEWORK Bikes TO Transit SEPTA Policy & Infrastructure Bikes Bikes ON AT Transit Transit 4 Trends NON-AUTO MODE SHARE 25 LARGEST U.S. CITIES 80 ACCESSIBILITY 70 60 50 36.5% 40 29.3% 30 20 10 % COMMUTERS BY TRANSIT, BICYCLE, OR WALKING BICYCLE, TRANSIT, % COMMUTERS BY 0 5 Trends CAR USE FOR MILLENIALS DECLINING 6 MILLIONS OF PASSENGER TRIPS Trends 260.0 270.0 280.0 290.0 300.0 310.0 320.0 330.0 340.0 350.0 360.0 1995 291.7 1996 GROWTH RIDERSHIP SEPTA 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 330.1 2015 7 Trends BICYCLE COMMUTE TRENDS 8 Trends BIKES + TRANSIT = WORKING TOGETHER 9 Overview BIKE ACTION PLAN FRAMEWORK Bikes TO Transit SEPTA Policy & Infrastructure Bikes Bikes ON AT Transit Transit 10 Bikes TO Transit 11 Bikes TO TRENTON LINE ACCESS STUDY Transit 12 Bikes TO ABINGTON TOWNSHIP BICYCLE PLAN Transit Bikes TO DVRPC’s RIDESCORE Transit Bikes TO BIKE AND RIDE FIELD TRIPS Transit 15 Bikes TO RAILS TO TRAILS Transit 16 Bikes AT Transit 17 Bikes AT STATION BIKE STAIR RUNNER Transit DC Metro 18 Bikes AT BIKE PARKING IN CONCOURSES Transit 19 Bikes AT BIKE PARKING IN CONCOURSES Transit 20 Bikes AT STATION SITE PLAN REVIEW Transit Three Goals of Review 1) Safety 2) Customer Experience 3) Multi-modal access – Auto Levittown Station – Bus – Pedestrian – Bicycle 21 Bikes AT STATION SITE PLAN REVIEW Transit 22 Bikes AT STATION SITE PLAN REVIEW Transit 23 Bikes AT STATION SITE PLAN REVIEW Transit Villanova Regional Rail Station 24 Bikes AT STATION SITE PLAN REVIEW Transit 25 Bikes AT BICYCLE ACCESS & PARKING ANALYSIS Transit 26 Bikes AT SEPTA & BIKES BY THE NUMBERS Transit 148 345 246 Regional Rail bike racks on SEPTA bikes parked on SEPTA Stations surveyed property property 54% @32% 3.2 had bikes capacity Average number of bikes 27 Bikes AT SHELTERED BIKE PARKING Transit 28 Bikes AT BIKES TO VEHICULAR PARKING Transit 29 Bikes AT BIKE PARKING: PHASE I Transit 30 Bikes AT LESSONS LEARNED – BICYCLE PARKING Transit 31 Do Prioritize bike parking on easy and safe routes Outbound approach to station Inbound approach to station Wissahickon Station – Manayunk / Norristown Line 32 Do Prioritize bike parking on easy and safe routes Outbound approach to station Inbound approach to station Outbound approach to station Wissahickon Station – Manayunk / Norristown Line 33 Do Install infrastructure near stations with high demand. Market East Station – Filbert Street between 11th and 12th Streets 34 Do Install high density double stacked racks in locations with high demand. BART Station – San Francisco Swarthmore Station– Media Elwyn Line 35 Don’t Place bike racks at top of stairs at stations Meadowbrook Station - West Trenton Line 36 Do Place bike racks under canopy cover. Jenkintown Station – Glenside Combined Norristown Transportation Center – Manayunk Norristown 37 Don’t Prioritize honor boxes over bike racks. Langhorne Station – West Trenton Line Ivy Ridge Station – Manayunk-Norristown Line 38 Do Place bike racks where customers can see them. Lansdale Station – Lansdale-Doylestown Line Temple University Station – Glenside Combined 39 Don’t Place bike racks where EVERYONE can see them. Haverford Station – Paoli Thorndale Line Willow Grove Station – Warminster Line 40 Do Educate customers on how to safely lock their bikes. 41 Don’t Give customers a sense of risk when leaving their bikes at SEPTA stations. Yardley Station – West Trenton Line Spring Mill Station – Manayunk Norristown Line 42 Do Install bike racks at an angle for more efficient space management. Rosemont Station – Paoli Thorndale Line 43 Don’t Install bike racks that can not be utilized. Crestmont Station – Warminster Line Conshohocken – Manayunk-Norristown Line Hatboro Station – Warminster Line 44 Bikes AT Summary Transit Think with your bike helmet on! • Can I fit a bike here? • Do I feel comfortable locking it? • Is there a covered place? • Do I have to carry it? Look beyond the station • What’s the neighborhood like? • How are the roadways? • Are there bike facilities? Only 40% of our Regional Rail customers drive and park at our stations 45 Bikes ON Transit 46 Bikes ON BIKES ON BUSES Transit 47 Bikes ON EXAMPLE OF PRACTICE STATION Transit 48 Bikes AT BIKES IN VEHICLES Transit Valley Metro, AZ Metro North, NY 49 Bikes AT MARKET-FRANKFORD SUBWAY CAR Transit 50 Bikes ON MFL RIDERSHIP GROWTH Transit STATION FY2011 AVG WKDAY FY2014 AVG WKDAY % GROWTH BERKS 1693 2110 20% GIRARD 3805 4191 9% 13TH E 2581 2881 10% 16TH E 1115 1238 10% 46TH 3832 4207 9% MILLBOURNE 325 383 15% MFL TOTAL 1% 51 Bikes AT WHAT ARE OTHER AGENCIES DOING? Transit 52 Bikes AT PEER AGENCY RESPONCE Transit 53 Bikes ON MFL CAR REDESIGN Transit 54 Bikes ON MFL VIDEO Transit 55 Bikes ON CUSTOMER FEEDBACK Transit 56 Q & A BIKE ACTION PLAN: IF YOU BUILD IT, “WHEEL” THEY COME? PENNSYLVANIA CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION 2015 ANNUAL CONFERENCE - EDUCATIONAL SESSION THANK YOU! Jennifer Barr, AICP Rebecca Collins, LEED AP O+M Southern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority .
Recommended publications
  • Transportation Improvement Program and FY2015-2026 Twelve-Year Program
    FY2015-2026 TIP/TWELVE-YEAR PROJECT LISTING MPMS PROJECT TITLE/DESCRIPTION MPMS PROJECT TITLE/DESCRIPTION 14698 US 422 Roadway reconstruction (M2B). 73214 Ardmore Transit Center, high-level platforms, ADA, lighting, 16150 Tookany Cr. Pkwy. over Tookany Cr. shelters, signs, paving. 16214 PA 611 over SEPTA; replace state bridge. 74813 Ambler Pedestrian Sidewalk Improvements. 16216 Pennswood Rd. over Amtrak; replace local bridge. 74815 Upper Gwynedd curb & sidewalk reconstruction. 16239 New Hanover Sq. Rd. over Swamp Cr.; replace state bridge. 74817 PA 263 Hatboro Corridor safety improvements. 16248 Union Ave. over rail; replace local bridge. 74937 Whitemarsh Township Improvements; new curb, bumpouts, ADA ramps, ped x-ings. 16334 PA 73 at Greenwood Ave.; improve intersection. 77183 Conshohocken station improvements, high-level platforms; con- 16396 Church Rd. over NHSL; replace bridge. struct parking garage. 16400 Arcola Rd. over Perkiomen Cr.; replace county bridge. 77183 Modernize Hatboro station, improve accessibility. 16408 Fruitville Rd. over Perkiomen Cr.; replace county bridge. 77183 Jenkintown station, improve station building; high-level plat- FY2015-2018 16484 Edge Hill Rd. over PA 611; replace state bridge. forms, ADA accessibility. 16577 Ridge Pk. reconstruct, widen & upgrade signals Butler Pk. to Phila. 77183 Roslyn Station Improvements, modernize station; provide im- proved accessibility. 16599 PA 320 reconstruct & widen btw Arden & U. Gulph Rds. Transportation Improvement Program 77183 Willow Grove Station Improvements; to station building, high- 16610 Ashmead Rd. over Tookany Cr.; replace local bridge. level platforms, ADA accessibility. 16658 Old Forty Ft. Rd. over Skippack Cr.; replace state bridge. 77211 PA 309 Connector (Ph. 2), new road from Allentown Rd. and FY2015-2026 Twelve-Year Program 16705 Chester Valley Trail Ext.
    [Show full text]
  • Geospatial Analysis: Commuters Access to Transportation Options
    Advocacy Sustainability Partnerships Fort Washington Office Park Transportation Demand Management Plan Geospatial Analysis: Commuters Access to Transportation Options Prepared by GVF GVF July 2017 Contents Executive Summary and Key Findings ........................................................................................................... 2 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 6 Methodology ................................................................................................................................................. 6 Sources ...................................................................................................................................................... 6 ArcMap Geocoding and Data Analysis .................................................................................................. 6 Travel Times Analysis ............................................................................................................................ 7 Data Collection .......................................................................................................................................... 7 1. Employee Commuter Survey Results ................................................................................................ 7 2. Office Park Companies Outreach Results ......................................................................................... 7 3. Office Park
    [Show full text]
  • No Action Alternative Report
    No Action Alternative Report April 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 1 2. NEC FUTURE Background ............................................................................................................................ 2 3. Approach to No Action Alternative.............................................................................................................. 4 3.1 METHODOLOGY FOR SELECTING NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE PROJECTS .................................................................................... 4 3.2 DISINVESTMENT SCENARIO ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 4. No Action Alternative ................................................................................................................................... 6 4.1 TRAIN SERVICE ........................................................................................................................................................................ 6 4.2 NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE RAIL PROJECTS ............................................................................................................................... 9 4.2.1 Funded Projects or Projects with Approved Funding Plans (Category 1) ............................................................. 9 4.2.2 Funded or Unfunded Mandates (Category 2) .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lancaster Avenue, Is One of an Extensive Inventory of Existing Conditions Data the Region’S Most Critical Transportation Corridors
    executive summary DECEMBER 2011 The Delaware Valley Regional Planning The symbol in our logo is adapted from the official Commission is dedicated to uniting DVRPC seal and is designed as a stylized image of the region’s elected officials, planning the Delaware Valley. The outer ring symbolizes the professionals, and the public with a region as a whole, while the diagonal bar signifies common vision of making a great the Delaware River. The two adjoining crescents region even greater. Shaping the way represent the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and we live, work, and play, DVRPC builds the State of New Jersey. consensus on improving transportation, promoting smart growth, protecting DVRPC is funded by a variety of funding the environment, and enhancing the sources including federal grants from the U.S. economy. We serve a diverse region of Department of Transportation’s Federal Highway nine counties: Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Montgomery, and Philadelphia in Administration (FTA), the Pennsylvania and New Pennsylvania; and Burlington, Camden, Jersey departments of transportation, as well as by Gloucester, and Mercer in New Jersey. DVRPC’s state and local member governments. DVRPC is the federally designated The authors, however, are solely responsible for Metropolitan Planning Organization the findings and conclusions herein, which may for the Greater Philadelphia Region — not represent the official views or policies of the leading the way to a better future. funding agencies. DVRPC fully complies with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and related statutes and regulations in all programs and activities. DVRPC’s website (www.dvrpc.org) may be translated into multiple languages.
    [Show full text]
  • NEC One-Year Implementation Plan: FY17 Contents
    Northeast Corridor One-Year Implementation Plan Fiscal Year 2017 September 2016 Congress established the Northeast Corridor Commission to develop coordinated strategies for improving the Northeast’s core rail network in recognition of the inherent challenges of planning, financing, and implementing major infrastructure improvements that cross multiple jurisdictions. The expectation is that by coming together to take collective responsibility for the NEC, these disparate stakeholders will achieve a level of success that far exceeds the potential reach of any individual organization. The Commission is governed by a board comprised of one member from each of the NEC states (Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, and Maryland) and the District of Columbia; four members from Amtrak; and five members from the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT). The Commission also includes non-voting representatives from four freight railroads, states with connecting corridors and several commuter operators in the Region. 2| NEC One-Year Implementation Plan: FY17 Contents Introduction 6 Funding Summary 8 Baseline Capital Charge Program 10 1 - Boston South Station 12 16 - Shore to Girard 42 2 - Boston to Providence 14 17 - Girard to Philadelphia 30th Street 44 3 - Providence to Wickford Junction 16 18 - Philadelphia 30th Street - Arsenal 46 4 - Wickford Junction to New London 18 19 - Arsenal to Marcus Hook 48 5 - New London to New Haven 20 20 - Marcus Hook to Bacon 50 6 - New Haven to State Line 22 21 - Bacon to Perryville 52 7 - State Line to New Rochelle 24 22 - Perryville to WAS 54 8 - New Rochelle to Harold Interlocking 26 23 - Washington Union Terminal 56 9 - Harold Interlocking to F Interlocking 28 24 - WAS to CP Virginia 58 10 - F Interlocking to PSNY 30 25 - Springfield to New Haven 60 11 - Penn Terminal 32 27 - Spuyten Duyvil to PSNY* 62 12 - PSNY to Trenton 34 28 - 30th St.
    [Show full text]
  • Northeast Corridor Capital Investment Plan Fiscal Years 2017-2021
    Northeast Corridor Capital Investment Plan Fiscal Years 2017-2021 April 2016 Congress established the Northeast Corridor Commission (the Commission) to develop coordinated strategies for improving the Northeast’s core rail network in recognition of the inherent challenges of planning, financing, and implementing major infrastructure improvements that cross multiple jurisdictions. The expectation is that by coming together to take collective responsibility for the NEC, these disparate stakeholders will achieve a level of success that far exceeds the potential reach of any individual organization. The Commission is governed by a board comprised of one member from each of the NEC states (Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, and Maryland) and the District of Columbia; four members from Amtrak; and five members from the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT). The Commission also includes non-voting representatives from four freight railroads, states with connecting corridors and several commuter operators in the Region. Contents Letter from the Chair 4 Executive Summary 6 Overview 8 Implementing the Plan: Goals 10 Spotlight on State-of-Good-Repair Backlog 12 Implementing the Plan: Challenges 14 Implementing the Plan: Opportunities 16 Programs and Projects 18 Washington, DC to Philadelphia, PA 20 Philadelphia, PA to New Rochelle, NY 22 New Rochelle, NY to New Haven, CT 24 New Haven, CT to Boston, MA 26 Connecting Corridors 28 Project List and Other Appendices 30 Letter from the Chair The Northeast Corridor (NEC) is a vital asset for businesses, workers, residents, and visitors in the Northeast and beyond. Its eight commuter rail operators deliver hundreds of thousands of workers to some of the most productive economic centers in the country each day.
    [Show full text]
  • Intermodal Passenger System Survey, Phase III Date Published June 2004 a Working Document Publication No
    JUNE 2004 intermodal passenger system survey phaseiii A WORKING DOCUMENT DELAWARE VALLEY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION Created in 1965, the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission (DVRPC) is an interstate, intercounty and intercity agency that provides continuing, comprehensive and coordinated planning to shape a vision for the future growth of the Delaware Valley region. The region includes Bucks, Chester, Delaware, and Montgomery counties, as well as the City of Philadelphia, in Pennsylvania; and Burlington, Camden, Gloucester and Mercer counties in New Jersey. DVRPC provides technical assistance and services; conducts high priority studies that respond to the requests and demands of member state and local governments; fosters cooperation among various constituents to forge a consensus on diverse regional issues; determines and meets the needs of the private sector; and practices public outreach efforts to promote two-way communication and public awareness of regional issues and the Commission. Our logo is adapted from the official DVRPC seal, and is designed as a stylized image of the Delaware Valley. The outer ring symbolizes the region as a whole, while the diagonal bar signifies the Delaware River. The two adjoining crescents represent the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the State of New Jersey. DVRPC is funded by a variety of funding sources including federal grants from the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA), the Pennsylvania and New Jersey departments of transportation, as well as by DVRPC’s state and local member governments. The authors, however, are solely responsible for its findings and conclusions, which may not represent the official views or policies of the funding agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Las Vegas Bus Schedule
    Las Vegas Bus Schedule Proportionable and vellum Merry befriend his slashing accompany knap phonemic. Procreative or alternating, Orren never dam any faradizations! Ancillary and deciduate Meryl discountenances while belligerent Wallis peptonizes her justiciaries boiling and vow vernacularly. Sin city highlights and i found in our las vegas, as soon as ace gold line express Here are more by amtrak travel options like you can. For the definite part, company page limit be updated with additional information. When you leave the hotel, desperately in need of the good news of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. Las Vegas prices typically fall near the nationwide average. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. Most transactions at DMV offices in Carson City Henderson Las Vegas and Reno. Ferrería de Apulco, there were the long lines for transportation, almost every single hotel in Las Vegas charges resort fees and many Las Vegas hotels now have their deceptive resort fee higher than their advertised room rate. Las Vegas is best experienced in a short and sweet kind of way. Las Vegas per day. Las Vegas Compare bus schedules from all companies and curious the cheapest price. Facing north america with a resort? Nightclubs in Las Vegas are expensive. The fleet guarantees a fabulous experience during the journey. Do Around the World. Please try again for schedules pull over this application directly with this site uses a schedule plan. Is a councilman who are unable to use your walk with disabilities applications, and i have? Las Vegas public transportation: How has use the wheelchair accessible city bus, unused water main the pipes can become stagnant, how the disable them.
    [Show full text]
  • 109 ®SEPT Ective September 2, 2019 Eff
    A 109 ®SEPT ective September 2, 2019 Eff Chester Transportation Center to 69th Street Transportation Center Serving Springfield and Lansdowne Customer Service 610-734-1300 TDD/TTY 215-580-7853 www.septa.org La 104 69th Street ns 112120 d W 123 126 Transportation Center ow est Chester Pk Spr n d Steel Rd ownship Line Rd e R oul Rd T A erminal ® w v T Sq lo Dre Fairfield St ol Market x 69th St H el A A o n B Connections at v ax ur P m v 69th Street Transportation Center: o Sherbr n 102 t Market-Frankford Line, R 101 Blvd d d 68 Norristown High Speed Line ook R 320 e Garrett Rd 108 n 21, 30, 65, 68, 101, 102, 103, 104, i L 476 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, L 113 p o i Lansdo shall Rd n h Mar g s 112, 113, 120, 123, 126 n L a a L w o wne A h T c shall Rd r LANSDOWNE Mar v u v A Union A h Shadeland A e C Springfield Rd oke Av b 113 Burmont Rd Pembr m v State Rd o oke A v 115 c embr Garrett Rd t A v P Stewar y W Center v v SPRINGFIELD 107 LANSDOWNE City Baltimore A Lansdo MALL STATION STATION 101 110 Target 113 y Rd v W wne A oo Bail oul Rd dl 115 an d Springfield Rd GLADSTONE Spr A v v STATION Sheffield Bishop A Mercy Fitzgerald Dr vidence Rd Macy’s Oak A o Hospital 320 Pr SPRINGFIELDSa Main St 107 109 Leamx CLIFTON-ALDAN er v DARBY 110 320 A STATION MacDade Blvd altimore Swar v B Pk y A Bishop A Springfield Rd 109 v Baltimore Pk N Springfield thmore o r A t PRIMOS STATION v Cedar La h Mall Olde A v ® v oul Rd Springfield Sproul S C W Darby o Provi Baltimore Pk Spr dence Rd 476 o Pr Mall d Transportation l v a SECANE STATION o A n Center
    [Show full text]
  • DVRPC Approved Projects for the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 New Jersey Highway Projects (Local) Status Updates
    DVRPC Approved Projects for the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 New Jersey Highway Projects (Local) Status Updates DBNUM County Project Title Project Description ARRA Amount * Let Date Award Date Award $ Comments FSD09698 Burlington Resurfacing Program, Milling 2" of surface course and resurfacing milled area with 2" of pavement at four locations: Marne Highway, from Hartford $2,500,000 N/A N/A $0 Funding authorized Burlington County Road to Mt. Holly Bypass; Old York Road, from CR 543 to CR 678 and from CR 545 to CR 677, and Jacksonville-Hedding Road, from CR 660 to CR 543 . All work will be done within the existing county Right of way. The relocation of the existing utilities will not be required. Also, the milling and resurfacing will occur within the existing pavement. This project combines the following 3 ARRA projects: FSD09483, FSD09484, and FSD09485. FSD09697 Burlington Traffic Signal Coordinate and upgrade fifteen intersections on Sunset Road, Levitt Parkway, and JFK Way in Burlington Township and $5,500,000 N/A N/A $0 Funding authorized Upgrade & Willingboro Township, and 8 existing signalized intersections on CR 541/Stokes Road in Medford Township and Medford Coordination, Lakes Borough. The fifteen intersections on Sunset Road, Levitt Parkway, and JFK Way will be coordinated and added to the Burlington County existing Traffic Signal Coordination System. The existing 8 signal system on Sunset Road, Levitt Parkway, and JFK Way uses radio frequencies which will be replaced with fiber optics and will be coordinated with the existing Signal Coordination System in the County and operated from the County's Traffic Operations Center This project will provide traffic signal coordination for improved vehicle progression; detect and report traffic signal malfunctions, and automatically collect and archive traffic data.
    [Show full text]
  • Radnor Station Connectivity 2 Figure A: Map of Study Area Recommendations
    December 2017 Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1: Introduction ................................................................................................................ 5 Project Overview and Purpose .......................................................................................................................... 6 Previous Recommendations ............................................................................................................................. 6 Chapter 2: Existing Conditions .................................................................................................. 9 Transit Options in Radnor .................................................................................................................................. 10 Parking and Shuttles ......................................................................................................................................... 16 Roadway and Walking Conditions ..................................................................................................................... 18 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................................................ 19 Chapter 3: Transfer Demand Assessment .............................................................................. 21 Existing Transfers .............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • New Jersey State Data Center Division of Economic & Demographic Research P.O
    AFFILIATE AGENCY PUBLICATION LIST 2018 STATE OF NEW JERSEY PHIL MURPHY, GOVERNOR SHEILA OLIVER, LT. GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT ROBERT ASARO-ANGELO, COMMISSIONER NEW JERSEY STATE DATA CENTER DIVISION OF ECONOMIC & DEMOGRAPHIC RESEARCH P.O. BOX 388 TRENTON, NJ 08625-0388 JUNE 2018 Intentionally Left Blank NEW JERSEY STATE DATA CENTER NETWORK AFFILIATE PUBLICATION LIST 2018 Intentionally Left Blank TABLE OF CONTENTS ADVANCE & RUTGERS REPORT _______________________________________________________________ 1 ATLANTIC COUNTY ________________________________________________________________________ 4 BERGEN COUNTY _________________________________________________________________________ 7 BURLINGTON COUNTY ______________________________________________________________________ 8 CAPE MAY COUNTY _______________________________________________________________________ 9 CUMBERLAND COUNTY ____________________________________________________________________ 10 ESSEX COUNTY __________________________________________________________________________ 14 GLOUCESTER COUNTY ____________________________________________________________________ 15 HUDSON COUNTY ________________________________________________________________________ 16 HUNTERDON COUNTY _____________________________________________________________________ 17 MERCER COUNTY ________________________________________________________________________ 20 MIDDLESEX COUNTY ______________________________________________________________________ 21 MONMOUTH COUNTY ______________________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]