DOCSLIB.ORG

Crna Gora SKUPŠTINA Administrativni Odbor Broj 00-63-14/14-4 Podgorica, 10

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Crna Gora SKUPŠTINA Administrativni Odbor Broj 00-63-14/14-4 Podgorica, 10 Crna Gora SKUPŠTINA Administrativni odbor Broj 00-63-14/14-4 Podgorica, 10. aprila 2014. godine SKUPŠTINI CRNE GORE P O D G O R I C A Administrativni odbor Skupštine Crne Gore 25. saziva, na 31. sjednici održanoj 25. marta 2014. godine, utvrdio je PREDLOG LISTE ZA IMENOVANJE SAVJETA RTCG PO OVLAŠĆENIM PREDLAGAČIMA sa obrazloženjem i izvještajem o sprovedenom postupku za imenovanje Savjeta, koji vam dostavljamo na razmatranje i odlučivanje. Za izvjestioca Odbora na sjednici Skupštine određen je Radivoje Lala Nikčević, predsjednik Odbora. PREDSJEDNIK ODBORA Radivoje Lala Nikčević PREDLOG LISTE ZA IMENOVANJE SAVJETA RADIO I TELEVIZIJE CRNE GORE PO OVLAŠĆENIM PREDLAGAČIMA: 1. DOC. DR NIKOLA VUKČEVIĆ, kandidat Univerziteta Crne Gore i Univerziteta Donja Gorica “UDG”; 2. AKADEMIK PROF. DR PERKO VUKOTIĆ, kandidat Crnogorske akademije nauka i umjetnosti; 3. DRAGANA TRIPKOVIĆ, kandidatkinja nevladinih organizacija iz oblasti kulture: - Nevladino udruženje “OTVORENI KULTURNI FORUM“, Cetinje; - Nevladina organizacija „Fenomeni“, Kolašin. 4. IVAN MITROVIĆ, kandidat Unije poslodavaca Crne Gore; 5. DOC. DR MIMO DRAŠKOVIĆ, kandidat nevladine organizacije iz oblasti medija: -Nevladino udruženje „CIVILNI FORUM”, Nikšić. 6. GORAN ĐUROVIĆ, kandidat nevladinih organizacija iz oblasti zaštite ljudskih prava i sloboda, koje se bave ostvarivanjem i zaštitom: nacionalne, rodne i ukupne ravnopravnosti; prava na zdravu životnu sredinu; prava potrošača; prava lica sa invaliditetom ili prava na obrazovanje i socijalnu zaštitu: - Nevladino udruženje „NVO ADRIA“, Sutomore; - Nevladino udruženje „UDRUŽENJE ZA POMOĆ LICIMA OMETENIM U PSIHOFIZIČKOM RAZVOJU“, Nikšić; - Nevladino udruženje „ORGANIZACIJA CIVILNIH INVALIDA RATA ZA BAR I ULCINJ“, Bar; - Nevladino udruženje „Organizacija slijepih za Nikšić, Šavnik i Plužine“, Nikšić; - Nevladino udruženje „Udruženje paraplegičara Podgorice“; - Nevladino udruženje „Udruženje paraplegičara Bar“; - Nevladino udruženje „SOS TELEFON ZA ŽENE I DJECU ŽRTVE NASILJA“, Podgorica; - Nevladino udruženje „EKSPEDICIJA“-„EXPEDITIO“, Kotor; - Nevladino udruženje „UDRUŽENJE RODITELJA DJECE SA TEŠKOĆAMA U RAZVOJU ZRAČAK NADE“, Pjevlja; - Nevladino udruženje „Udruženje paraplegičara Bijelo Polje i Mojkovac“, Bijelo Polje; - Nevladina fondacija „FORS MONTENEGRO“ – Fondacija za razvoj sjevera Crne Gore, Nikšić; - Nevladino udruženje „UDRUŽENJE MEDICINSKIH SESTARA I TEHNIČARA BAR“; - Nevladino udruženje HRVATSKO GRAĐANSKO DRUŠTVO CRNE GORE, Kotor; - Nevladino udruženje „29.11.43“, Tivat; - Nevladino udruženje „ORGANIZACIJA BORACA NARODNOOSLOBODILAČKOG RATA 1941-1945 BERANE“; - Nevladino udruženje “Udruženje za podršku osobama sa invaliditetom“ – Bijelo Polje, skraćenog naziva UPOSI-BP, na engleskom jeziku naziva The Association for supporting persons with disabilities – Bijelo Polje, skraćenog naziva ASPWD-BP, Bijelo Polje; - Nevladino udruženje „TOLERANCIJA“ – Berane; - Nevladino udruženje „EKOLOŠKI CENTAR – DELFIN“, Kotor; - Nevladino udruženje „UDRUŽENJE MLADIH SA HENDIKEPOM NIKŠIĆ“; 2 7. MILAN RADOVIĆ, kandidat nevladinih organizacija iz oblasti zaštite ljudskih prava i sloboda, koje se bave ostvarivanjem i zaštitom: nacionalne, rodne i ukupne ravnopravnosti; prava na zdravu životnu sredinu; prava potrošača; prava lica sa invaliditetom ili prava na obrazovanje i socijalnu zaštitu: - Nevladina organizacija „35 mm“, Podgorica; - Nevladina fondacija „Građanska alijansa“, na engleskom jeziku naziva „Civic aliance“, na albanskom jeziku naziva „Aliansa qytetare“, Podgorica; - Nevladino udruženje „Inicijativa mladih za ljudska prava“, Podgorica; - Nevladino udruženje „ASOCIJACIJA ZA DEMOKRATSKI PROSPERITET - ZID“, Podgorica; - Nevladina fondacija „Fond za aktivno građanstvo fAKT“ Podgorica; - Nevladino udruženje „INFOMONT“, Budva; - Nevladino udruženje „FORUM MLADI I NEFORMALNA EDUKACIJA“, Podgorica; - Nevladino udruženje „CENTAR ZA ROMSKE INICIJATIVE“, Nikšić; - Nevladino udruženje NVO „ALFA Centar“, Nikšić; - Nevladino udruženje „Udruženje paraplegičara Podgorica“; - Nevladino udruženje „Udruženje paraplegičara Bar“; - Nevladino udruženje HRVATSKO GRAĐANSKO DRUŠTVO CRNE GORE, Kotor; - Nevladino udruženje Ekološki pokret „OZON“, na engleskom jeziku naziva Environmental movement „OZON“, Nikšić; - Nevladino udruženje „DJECA – ENFANTS“, Rožaje; - Nevladino udruženje „SPIRIT ART MONTENEGRO“, Podgorica; - Nevladino udruženje „Udruženje preduzetnica Crne Gore“, Podgorica; 8. DR VLADIMIR PAVIĆEVIĆ, kandidat Unije slobodnih sindikata Crne Gore; 9. IGOR TOMIĆ, kandidat Crnogorskog olimpijskog komiteta i Paraolimpijskog komiteta Crne Gore. 3 O B R A Z L O Ž E NJ E SA IZVJEŠTAJEM O SPROVEDENOM POSTUPKU ZA IMENOVANJE SAVJETA RADIO I TELEVIZIJE CRNE GORE U skupštinskoj proceduri u toku je postupak za imenovanje devet članova Savjeta Radio i Televizije Crne Gore, saglasno Zakonu o javnim radio-difuznim servisima („Službeni list Crne Gore“, br. 79/08, 45/12). Na osnovu člana 33 Zakona o javnim radio-difuznim servisima Crne Gore Administrativni odbor Skupštine Crne Gore 25. saziva, dana 22. januara 2014. godine, uputio je Javni poziv ovlašćenim predlagačima za imenovanje članova Savjeta RTCG, putem web sajta Skupštine, u “Službenom listu Crne Gore” i u dnevnim novinama: „Pobjeda“, „ Dan“, ND „Vijesti“, i „Dnevne novine“. Odbor je na 29. sjednici, održanoj 13. marta 2014. godine, konstatovao da su iz svih kategorija ovlašćenih predlagača određenih članom 28 stav 1 Zakona o javnim radio difuznim servisima dostavljeni predlozi kandidata, i to: 1.Predlozi univerziteta u Crnoj Gori, za jednog člana: 1) DOC. MR KATARINA ŠVABIĆ, kandidatkinja Univerziteta „Mediteran“; 2) DOC. DR NIKOLA VUKČEVIĆ, kandidat Univerziteta Crne Gore i Univerziteta Donja Gorica “UDG”; 2.Predlozi Crnogorske akademije nauka i umjetnosti i Matice crnogorske, za jednog člana: 1) AKADEMIK PROF. DR PERKO VUKOTIĆ, kandidat Crnogorske akademije nauka i umjetnosti; 3.Predlozi nacionalnih ustanova kulture i nevladinih organizacija iz oblasti kulture, za jednog člana: 1) GOJKO KASTRATOVIĆ, kandidat nacionalnih ustanova kulture: -Biblioteka za slijepe Crne Gore; -JU Muzički centar Crne Gore; -JU Centar savremene umjetnosti Crne Gore; -Kraljevsko pozorište “Zetski dom”; -Crnogorsko narodno pozorište; -JU Nacionalna biblioteka Crne Gore “Đurđe Crnojević”; -JU Narodni muzej Crne Gore; -Pomorski muzej Crne Gore; -Prirodnjački muzej Crne Gore. 2) DRAGANA TRIPKOVIĆ, kandidatkinja nevladinih organizacija: -Otvoreni kulturni forum (OKF); -“Zona kulture“ Podgorica; -“Fenomeni“ Kolašin; - „Punkt“; -Crnogorsko društvo nezavisnih književnika (CGNK); -ATAK – NVO Alternativna teatarska aktivna kompanija; -Institut za crnogorski jezik i književnost; -Montenegrin universal theatre-Podgorica; -Crnogorski „P.E.N.“ Centar; -Crnogorski filmski festival. 4 3) SENAD GAČEVIĆ, kandidat nevladinih organizacija: -„Studio Horag“; -Folklorni ansambl „Nikola Đurković“, Kotor; -„Udruženje folklornih ansambala Crne Gore“; -Organizacija za promovisanje i razvoj vizuelnih umjetnosti i kulture „MO-ART“ –Mojkovac; -„MEDIA“ Plav; -Javna ustanova „Ratkovićeve večeri poezije“, Bijelo Polje; -„Likovni klub KULA“, Rožaje; -„Međunarodni umjetnički forum-Performa“; -„Glas tradicije, dijaloga, tolerancije“; -„MONTE-FEST“; -„TURIST“, Plav; -„BRUNA“, Herceg Novi; -„ASOCIJACIJA KOMERCIJALNIH EMITERA CRNE GORE“; -„CRNOGORSKA ALTERNATIVNA KULTURA“; -„Stari most“ Bijelo Polje; -„Vokalni sastav ASSA VOCE“ – Podgorica; -„Udruženje -ALMANAH“ –ZA OČUVANJE KULTURNO-ISTORIJSKE BAŠTINE MUSLIMANA-BOŠNJAKA CRNE GORE“; -S.O.S. za planetu, Bar; -Organizacija za zaštitu prava autora muzike Crne Gore „PAM CG“; -„Stari aerodrom ll“, Podgorica; -„Harmonika Montenegrina“, Podgorica; -KULTURNO UMJETNIČKO DRUŠTVO Zeta-Golubovci; -„AKADEMSKO KULTURNO UMJETNIČKO DRUŠTVO – MIRKO SRZENTIĆ“; -FA „MONTE FOLK“; -„Savez mažoretki Crne Gore“; -„MODNI KLUB MODEST-TIVAT“; -„GITARA“, Podgorica; -„Aluminijum“ Podgorica; -„TRITON“ Plav; -Kulturno umjetničko društvo „Boka“ Tivat; -„MUZIČKA ASOCIJACIJA CRNE GORE-MUSIC ASSOCIATION OF MONTENEGRO“; -„ALATA“. 4.Predlozi Privredne komore Crne Gore i udruženja poslodavaca koje je zastupljeno u Socijalnom savjetu, za jednog člana; 1) VOJO BANOVIĆ, kandidat Privredne komore Crne Gore; 2) IVAN MITROVIĆ, kandidat Unije poslodavaca Crne Gore; 5 5.Predlozi nevladinih organizacija iz oblasti medija, osim udruženja emitera, za jednog člana: 1) DOC. DR MIMO DRAŠKOVIĆ, kandidat nevladinih organizacija iz oblasti medija: -“Civilni forum” Nikšić; -“Medija Tim” Nikšić; -“Spona” Berane; -„Koala produkcija”- „Coala production“, Podgorica; -“Adriatik Zvijezda”, Bijelo Polje; -”New Art “, Nikšić. 2) NIKOLA VUJANOVIĆ, kandidat nevladinih organizacija: -Udruženje novinara Cetinja; -„Organizacija žena Budva“; -„Organizacija žena Crne Gore“; -„Cetinjski modni studio“; -Ansambl narodnih igara i pjesama „Đurđevdansko kolo“, Podgorica; -Inicijativa savjesti „INSA“; -Crnogorski kulturni forum Cetinje; -„Organizacija žena Herceg Novi“; -„Moj put-My way“; -„Danas za sjutra“; -„Oro“ Podgorica. 6.Predlozi nevladinih organizacija iz oblasti zaštite ljudskih prava i sloboda, koje se bave ostvarivanjem i zaštitom: nacionalne, rodne i ukupne ravnopravnosti; prava na zdravu životnu sredinu; prava potrošača; prava lica sa invaliditetom ili prava na obrazovanje i socijalnu zaštitu, za dva člana: 1) GORAN ĐUROVIĆ, kandidat nevladinih organizacija: -Adria, Bar; -Djeca Tivta, Tivat; -Akcija za ljudska prava, Podgorica; -Udruženje za pomoć licima ometenim u psihofizičkom razvoju Nikšić; -Udruženje mladih sa hendikepom Crne Gore; -Organizacija civilnih invalida rata
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bulletin1 Medchamps2009 Updated28july
    18 emes Championnats de la Méditerranée de Karaté Cadets et Juniors 1ère Coupe de la Méditerranée de Karaté Under 21 Podgorica/ Montenegro 05/06 septembre 2009 th 18 Mediterranean Cadets and Juniors Karate Championships st 1 Mediterranean Karate Cup Under 21 Podgorica/Montenegro 05/06 September 2009 BULLETIN No. 1 18 emes Championnats de la Méditerranée de Karaté Cadets et Juniors 1ère Coupe de la Méditerranée de Karaté Under 21 Podgorica / Montenegro 05/06 septembre 2009 18 th Mediterranean Cadets and Juniors Karate Championships 1st Mediterranean Karate Cup Under 21 Podgorica / Montenegro 05/06 September 2009 AB 1 18 emes Championnats de la Méditerranée de Karaté Cadets et Juniors 1ère Coupe de la Méditerranée de Karaté Under 21 Podgorica/ Montenegro 05/06 septembre 2009 th 18 Mediterranean Cadets and Juniors Karate Championships st 1 Mediterranean Karate Cup Under 21 Podgorica/Montenegro 05/06 September 2009 GREETINGS FROM MONTENEGRO KARATE FEDERATION PRESIDENT Dear friends in sport, In ones own name, name of Montenegrin Karate Federation and Organizational Committee of Mediterranean Karate Championships – Cadet and Juniors and the first Mediterranean Cup, which will be held in Podgorica, I am blissful and honoured that I could send regards and invite you to come to Montenegro. Me and all the members of our Federation are proud off organizing such prestige and important Championship on both side satisfaction. Sincerely, You are welcome to capital town of Montenegro, Podgorica which will be host of Mediterranean Karate Championships – Cadet and Juniors and the first Mediterranean Cup under 21, on 05/06 September 2009. We will do our best to regale You as better as we could, and hope that Podgorica and Montenegro will stay in nice remembrance, with new knowledge of the first ecological state in Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • European Pulse Foreword / Calendar
    ISSN 1800-7678 EuropeanElectronic monthly magazine pulse for European Integration – No 70, July 2011 FOCUS OF THIS ISSUE Consequences of Montenegro’s potential failure to get the date for negotiations interview Scientific advisor in the Institute for Eu- ropean Studies, Dr Miroslav Prokopijević analysis Is the electoral law the main obstacle on the road to EU region Slovenia too counts corruption European pulse Foreword / Calendar Foreword: Merit Brussels, some time in 2019. Montenegro is about to close Chapter 23, following the verdicts against Vladan Žugić the members of a group which engaged in illicit trade in drugs, oil and weapons. Serbia hopes to close the remaining two chapters and join the EU by the end of the year. Brussels, a year later. Montenegro failed to close Chapter 23 because the judiciary did not demonstrate sufficient inde- pendence in the case against the former high officials charged with corruption. Serbia finished the negotiations, but is formally still not a member of EU. Balkans, July 2011. The last ICTY fugitive Goran Hadžić was delivered to the Hague and the first reactions suggest that Serbia might get the candidate status, maybe even the date for negotiations. Montenegro is also expected to get the date for negotiations. Balkans, a few weeks later. New tensions have erupted between Belgrade and Prishtina, leaving Serbia further away from the candidate status. Podgorica’s chances to get the date for negotiations are also declining, and the ruling elite are seeking an excuse in the regional context. That’s why the EU should stick to individual merit. A conditional date for negotiations with Mon- tenegro, especially if Ranka Čarapić delivers on her promise of two big fish, would dispel the doubts that Montenegro is a hostage to the region, which could further influence the process of European integrations.
    [Show full text]
  • Between the Political Convenience and Equal Opportunities Project Name: EU Is NOT a Member of Your Party
    Between the political convenience and equal opportunities Project name: EU is NOT a member of your party Donated by: FRESTA Partners: Educational Center - Krusevac Youth Cultural Center - Bitola Albanian Youth Council - Tirana Association for Democratic Initiatives - Gostivar Publisher: Association for Democratic Initiatives Chief editor: Lulzim Haziri Editor: Bekim Abdullai Coordinators: SEE-YN: Igor Milošovic - ADP ZID, Montenegro Sanita Jashari - ADI, Kosova Gerti Shella - AYC, Albania Aleksandar Ivanovic - EDC Krusevac, Serbia Zlatko Talevski - YCC, Macedonia BHRN: Bekim Abdullai - ADI, Macedonia Proofreader: Njomza Selimi Design & Pre-press: Valbon Elmazi Copies: 700 Printed: “Sofija” - Bogdanci South East European Youth Network Balkan Human Rights Network Between the Political Convenience and Equal Opportunities Project with financial support of Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs (FRESTA) Gostivar, 2006 CONTENT Chapter I - Introduction and ID of the Project I.1. Introduction I.2. Identity card of the project Chapter II - The research II.1. The range of multiplication of the number of political parties and political pluralism.· II.1.1. Albania II.1.2. Macedonia II.1.3. Serbia II.1.4. Montenegro II.2. The public about the equal opportunity chance II.3. The media picture of the political party suitability Chapter III - European standards and practice III.1. The analyses of the EU standards III.2. Parallel experiences Chapter IV - Conclusions and references Chapter V - Annexes V.1. Cross cutting initiative V.2. FRESTA program and network of the project participants V.3. Identity card of the partners in the project V.4. Questionnaire Chapter - I - Introduction Between the political convenience and equal opportunity PhD Pande LAZAREVSKI Introduction Being member of some political party is a benefit inherited from democracy, and parties themselves are political organizations aiming at getting the power in order to realize their own programs for leading the society and draw off their own ideas in the reality.
    [Show full text]
  • N5! 01 ~ ::Foil Datum .1'1·0LI' Lorts·
    YHlifBEP3HTET I(PHE roPE UNIVERSITY OF MONTENEGRO <l>MJI030(l>CKH <I)AKYJITET FACULTY OF PHILOSOPHY L(aHHna EojoBHl'la 66 Danila Bojovica bb II.ct>. 91 P.O. Box 91 81400 HI1KUIl1n 81400 Niksi6 UpHa fopa Montenegro Tel.: +3824024392\, 243913, 243976 Fax: +382 40 247 109, e-mail: [email protected] N5! 01 ~ ::foil Datum .1'1·0LI' lortS· UNlVERZITET eRNE GORE Senatu PODGORICA Vije6e Filozofskog fakulteta, na sjednici odrzanoj 8. 04.2015. godine, utvrdilo je PREDLOG Da Senat Univerziteta Crne Gore imenuje Komisiju za ocjenu podobnosti doktorske teze Crnogorska stranka 1925-1945 mr Novaka Adzi6a, u sastavu: 1. Prof. dr Serbo Rastoder, Filozofski fakultet Niksi6 2. Prof. dr Iva Banac, Filozofski fakultet Sveucilista Zagreb 3. Prof. dr Aleksandar Rastavi6, Filozofski fakultet Nis UNIVERZITET eRNE GORE VlJECU FILOZOFSKOG FAKULTETA NIKSIC Predmet: PRI.JAVA TEME ZA IZRADU DOKTORSKE DISERTACI.JE Molim postovano Vijece Filozofskogfakulteta Univerziteta erne Gore da mi odobri temu za izradu doktorske disertacije pod radnim naslovom "CRNOGORSKA STRANKA 1925-1945 ", Za .men/ora predlaiem akademika prof dr Serba Rastodera. U skladu sa Pravilima doktorskih studija, uz prijavu dostavljam: -Obrazloienje feme za izradu doktorske disertacije -biografiju i bibliograjiju kandidata -biografiju i bibliografiju mentora -ovjerenu kopiju magistarske diplome Kandidat U Niksi6u, 17, fe bruara 2015. Y~WP":P::'1I"''''' ,I"".J,," rOPE etJ~ r - ,I rET OBRAZLOZENJE TEME ZA IZRADU DOKTORSKE DISERTACIJE Tem{t: Crnogorska stronka 1925-1945. Tema doktorske disertacije kandidata mr Novaka Adzica radnog je nasJova Crnogorska siranka 1925-1945. Rijec je 0 podrucju naucnog istraZivanja nacionalne (drzavne) istorije Crne Gore i Jugoslavije u ~eriodu od 1925. do t945.
    [Show full text]
  • Medijski Dijalozi No. 26
    MEDIJSKI DIJALOZI časopis za istraživanje medija i društva MEDIA DIALOGUES journal for research of the media and society Godina X Broj 26 Podgorica Februar 2017. ISSN 1800‐7074 COBISS.CG‐ID 12734480 IM C Istraživački medijski centar ‐ Podgorica Osnivač i izdavač / Publisher IVPE‐ Cetinje Partner: Istraživački medijski centar – Podgorica Redakcija / Editorial Board Robert W. McChesney (USA), Boguslawa Dobek‐Ostrowska (Poljska), Nayia Roussou (Kipar), Andrew Balas (USA), Chunyang Zhu (NR Kina), Slavko Splichal (Slovenija) Tapas Ray (India), Frances E. Olsen (USA), Ratko Božović (Srbija), Nada Zgrabljić Rotar (Hrvatska), Gabriel J. Botma (Južna Afrika), Čedomir Čupić (Srbija), Valentina Mansurova (Rusija), Stjepan Malović (Hrvatska), Oleksandr Dorokhov (Ukraina), Divna Vuksanović (Srbija), Veselin Drašković (Crna Gora), Sead Alić (Hrvatska), Sandra Bašić Hrvatin (Slovenija), Yesim Kaptan (Turska), Slavo Kukić (Bosna i Hercegovina), Gordana Vilović (Hrvatska), Christos Frangonikolopoulos (Grčka), Željko Simić (Srbija), Wincharles Coker (Gana), Wu Feng (NR Kina), Željko Simić (Srbija), Nataša Ružić (Crna Gora), Rrapo Zguri (Albanija), Alexander Kashumov (Bugarska), Janko Nikolovski (Makedonija), Lejla Turčilo (Bosna i Hercegovina), Marija Čutura (Bosna i Hercegovina), Đorđe Obradović (Hrvatska), Vedada Baraković (Bosna i Hercegovina), Dubravka Valić Nedeljković (Srbija), Marko M. Đorđević (Srbija), Dejan Donev (Makedonija). Glavni i odgovorni urednik / Editor in Chief : dr Mimo Drašković Sekretar Redakcije/Sekretary of Editorial Board: mr Jelena Filipović PR i međunarodna saradnja/PR and International Cooperation: mr Anđelka Rogač Tehnički urednik / Technical Editor: Milojko Pušica Prevod / Translation: Dina Kajević Časopis izlazi tri puta godišnje / The Journal is published three times a year Radovi se recenziraju/ Papers are reviewed Štampa / Printed by : IVPE – Cetinje Tiraž / Circulation: 1000 primjeraka / 1000 copies Korisnički servis / Journal customer service: mob.
    [Show full text]
  • POLITICAL PARTY BUILDING and CIVIC DEVELOPMENT USAID Cooperative Agreement No: EE-A-00-98-00028-00 October 1 to December 31, 2001
    Quarterly Report MONTENEGRO: POLITICAL PARTY BUILDING AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT USAID Cooperative Agreement No: EE-A-00-98-00028-00 October 1 to December 31, 2001 I. SUMMARY Uncertainty over the question of Montenegrin independence has continued with no end in sight to the political crisis. An October meeting among Serb, Montenegrin and Federal representatives did not resolve the federation's future. Although the U.S. and the European Union (EU) have pressured Montenegrin authorities to resume dialogue with Serbia and abandon independence plans, the Montenegrin government announced that the issue would be decided in a referendum held in early 2002. However, at the insistence of EU High Representative Javier Solana, the negotiations on the future of the federation resumed in mid-December. Meanwhile, a draft referendum law, heavily criticized by the OSCE since it provides for passage by simple majority only, did not pass in parliament. The pro-Yugoslavia opposition continued to demand an investigation of cigarette smuggling operations that implicate President Milo Djukanovic. Whether independent or not, Montenegro’s transition to a modern European actor will depend on its ability to build a democratic system that allows for informed and open debate related to the political reform process. The National Democratic Institute for International Affairs (NDI) is committed to supporting democratic reforms in Montenegro as it addresses the continued need for internal political liberalization. The long-term goal of NDI’s Montenegro program is to strengthen Montenegro’s emerging democratic political system through increased organizational capacity of and improved public outreach by political parties and through the initiation of direct participation in the political process by nongovernmental organizations as a means to promote civil society and broad-based citizen participation in political affairs.
    [Show full text]
  • POLITICAL PARTY BUILDING and CIVIC DEVELOPMENT USAID Cooperative Agreement No: EE-A-00-98-00028-00 January 1 to March 31, 2002
    Quarterly Report MONTENEGRO: POLITICAL PARTY BUILDING AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT USAID Cooperative Agreement No: EE-A-00-98-00028-00 January 1 to March 31, 2002 I. SUMMARY After four months of negotiations between Serbia and Montenegro with the participation of the European Union’s High Representative Javier Solana, President Milo Djukanovic and Prime Minister Filip Vujanovic signed an agreement on March 14 that outlines the basis for a redefined state called Serbia and Montenegro and provides the opportunity for either member state to initiate efforts to secede after three years. Djukanovic’s return to Podgorica with a signed agreement was a surprise to the pro-independence Montenegrins, especially the Liberal Alliance in Montenegro (LSCG) and the Social Democratic Party (SDP). Both parties announced their intention to withdraw their support from the current government, which had been formed on the promise of a referendum in May 2002. As a result, protracted discussions on a cabinet reshuffle or early parliamentary elections are now underway. Meanwhile, as the parties negotiate and debate the redefinition of relations between Serbia and Montenegro in the parliament, they also must plan for local elections to be held in 19 of the 21 municipalities1 on May 15. Montenegro’s transition to democracy requires strong political and governing institutions that can provide for transparency, accountability, representation and citizen participation. The National Democratic Institute for International Affairs (NDI) is committed to supporting democratic reforms in Montenegro as it addresses the continued need for internal political liberalization. The long-term goal of NDI’s Montenegro program is to strengthen Montenegro’s emerging democratic political system through increased organizational capacity of and improved public outreach by political parties, and through the initiation of direct participation in the political process by nongovernmental organizations as a means to promote civil society and broad-based citizen participation in political affairs.
    [Show full text]
  • Montenegro's Independence Drive Crisis Group Europe Report N°169, 7 December 2005 Page Ii
    MONTENEGRO’S INDEPENDENCE DRIVE Europe Report N°169 – 7 December 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS................................................. i I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 II. MONTENEGRO IN BRIEF.......................................................................................... 2 A. HISTORICAL OVERVIEW........................................................................................................2 III. MONTENEGRINS AND SERBS.................................................................................. 4 A. INTERMINGLING....................................................................................................................4 B. R-E-S-P-E-C-T ....................................................................................................................4 IV. STATE UNION POLITICS........................................................................................... 5 A. DIVERGENT PRIORITIES.........................................................................................................6 B. DIVERGENT ECONOMIES .......................................................................................................7 C. A NEAR COLLAPSE ...............................................................................................................8 V. REFERENDUM POLITICS.......................................................................................... 9 A. HOW WILL
    [Show full text]
  • Balkans Briefing
    Balkans Briefing Podgorica/Brussels, 18 April 2001 MONTENEGRO: TIME TO DECIDE Pre-election Briefing I. INTRODUCTION The extraordinary parliamentary election to be held in Montenegro on 22 April 2001 is focused on the single issue of the republic’s future status, whether in a continued federal union with Serbia, or as an independent state. The election was called following the break-up of Montenegro’s ruling coalition at the end of December 2000 over this very question. Following the ouster of Slobodan Milošević as president of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (FRY) in October 2000, Montenegrin President Milo Djukanović opted to formalise the republic’s break with the FRY, which in practice had already ceased to function in any meaningful sense.1 On 28 December 2000 two of the parties in the ruling “For a Better Life” (DŽB) coalition, Djukanović’s Democratic Party of Socialists (DPS) and the Social Democratic party (SDP), adopted a new Platform on relations with Serbia, which envisaged a loose association of fully independent states. The anti- independence People’s Party (NS) promptly left the DŽB coalition, thus precipitating the forthcoming election. This briefing paper examines the key campaign issues and strategies of the main participants in the election. It considers the possible courses that events may take after the election. On the basis of this analysis it makes recommendations to the international community as well as to the political actors in Montenegro and Serbia as to policy options during and after the election period. The options for Montenegro’s future relationship with Serbia, the issues that will need to be resolved in defining a new relationship and the possible consequences for Montenegro and for the region of a Montenegrin move towards independence are discussed at length in the ICG report Montenegro: Settling for Independence? 2 The present briefing paper concentrates on the immediate issues connected with the election campaign.
    [Show full text]
  • Političko Oglašavanje Između Spina I Činjenica
    SPINoFAKT političko oglašavanje između spina i činjenica Pregled političkog oglašavanja na lokalnim izborima u Mojkovcu, Cetinju i Petnjici Izdavač: Centar za građansko obrazovanje (CGO) Urednica: Daliborka Uljarević Autor: Damir Nikočević Saradnice na publikaciji: Bojana Tomić Svetlana Tomić Dizajn i produkcija: Centar za građansko obrazovanje (CGO) ISBN 978-86- 85591-89- 1 COBISS.CG-ID 35111696 Izdavanje ove publikacije podržala je ambasada Kraljevine Holandije. Sadržaj ove publikacije je isključiva odgovornost Centra za građansko obrazovanje (CGO). Sadržaj: Uvod 6 1. Političko oglašavanje u Crnoj Gori – Prednosti i ograničenja 8 2. Monitoring medija tokom kampanje za lokalne izbore u Mojkovcu, Cetinju i Petnjici 12 Metodologija 12 Praćeni mediji 14 Parametri koji su praćeni 14 2.1 Ukupan broj objava o sve tri teme po vrsti medija 15 Televizije 17 Štampani mediji 20 Online mediji 22 Trend 22 2.2. Medijsko prisustvo političkih subjekata 23 2.2.1. Medijsko prisustvo političkih subjekata (zbirno sve tri opštine) 23 2.2.2. Lokalni izbori - Cetinje 26 Televizije 30 Štampani mediji 34 Online mediji 35 Trend 36 2.2.3 Lokalni izbori - Mojkovac 37 Televizije 40 Štampani mediji 43 Online mediji 44 Trend 45 2.2.4 Lokalni izbori - Petnjica 46 Televizije 49 Štampani mediji 51 Online mediji 52 Trend 53 2.3. Monitoring reklamiranja – Lokalni izbori 2017. 54 Uvodne napomene 54 Opšti podaci (TV i štampani mediji) 55 3. Zaključci i preporuke 62 Literatura 64 Uvod Političko oglašavanje je kao i svako drugo oglašavanje - zasniva se na dobrom predstavljanju izborne ponude i ima ubjeđivački karakter prema ciljanoj javnosti. Posljedice uticaja na birače su vidljive, a naročito u izbornoj kampanji.
    [Show full text]
  • Montenegro: Headed for New Divisions?
    Conflict Studies Research Centre Balka ns Series 07/11 Defence Academy of the United Kingdom Montenegro: Headed for New Divisions? Misa Djurkovic Key Points * The recent history of the Balkans suggests that the easiest way to challenge regional stability is combining a bad economic and social situation with oppressive national identity politics. * After the proclamation of independence, the problem of identity has dominated the Montenegrin political scene. Ethnic groups are becoming increasingly politicised. The ruling Montenegrin elite sees no need for dialogue. * Issues like the new constitution, symbols of the state and the church are highly volatile and could lead to new conflicts * Corruption, organised crime and absence of the rule of law still seriously threaten Montenegro's future in Europe. Contents Introduction 1 Electoral politics 2 State symbols and minorities 6 Old friends or new? 7 Unconstitutional processes 8 07/09 Montenegro: Headed for New Divisions? Misa Djurkovic Introduction Apart from being the set of the latest James Bond adventure,1 the small Balkan country of Montenegro is unique and interesting in many ways. Although it has only 670,000 inhabitants, its population could be used as a case study of just how complex the identity issue in the Balkans is. For example, the theorists of nationalism and national identity would find in Montenegro Firstly, a traditional pluralistic identity of majority Christian Orthodox population, which used to perceive itself at the same time as part of the Serbian nation, but also as Montenegrins; Secondly, a history of social engineering that succeeded in creating a breakdown of the Orthodox population into two separate nations; Finally, within the Muslim population, which represents approximately 11 per cent of the population, those who view themselves as a Bosniac minority and those who declare themselves ethnic Muslims.
    [Show full text]
  • From Multiplicity to Synergy? Organisational
    FROM MULTIPLICITY TO SYNERGY? ORGANISATIONAL PERSPECTIVES OF DEALING WITH THE PAST PROCESS IN SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO Nataša Milenković Belgrade, July 2003 – January 2004 Proofreading by: Tanja Ružić 1 Acknowledgments I would like to thank all the interviewees for the time and effort invested, despite their busy daily schedules. I would also like to extend special thanks to the people who attended the focus groups and the Women in Black group interview, who have considerably contributed to these reports. Moreover, I would like to extend many thanks to my colleagues, who facilitated focus groups, for their committed and supportive work. The people who did the transcription were under extreme pressure and without their utmost efforts none of this would have been available. Another special thanks goes to the women, who sorted out all the interviews according to interview questions. This report would have never been completed without the feedback and contribution provided by several colleagues and friends of mine. Special thanks to the dedicated interpreter, who made these reports readable in English. Last but not the least are my team members and managers of the QPSW, who offered me valuable support and demonstrated great patience for all the deadlines broken during the composing of this very important survey. 2 Content I Introduction 4 II Process Description 4 III Main Actors 8 IV Beneficiaries 9 V Approaches Used in DWP 10 VI Cooperation at Local, National and Regional Level 19 VII Products 27 VIII Obstacles 28 IX Donors 30 X Future Plans 32 XI Recommendations 33 Annexes 35 3 I Introduction This report is a part of the regional survey conducted in Serbia & Montenegro, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Croatia on dealing with the past (hereinafter DWP) issues by Quaker Peace and Social Witness (hereinafter QPSW).
    [Show full text]