Gaetano Filangieri Between Public Happiness and Institutional Economics

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Gaetano Filangieri Between Public Happiness and Institutional Economics Munich Personal RePEc Archive Contemporary of every age: Gaetano Filangieri between public happiness and institutional economics Balzano, Maria Silvia and Vecchione, Gaetano and Zamagni, Vera University of Naples Federico II, University of Naples Federico II, University of Bologna 10 January 2018 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/84538/ MPRA Paper No. 84538, posted 13 Feb 2018 18:03 UTC Contemporary of every age: Gaetano Filangieri between public happiness and institutional economics1 Maria Silvia Balzano Gaetano Vecchione Vera Zamagni University of Naples Federico II University of Naples Federico II University of Bologna [As long as] the evils which afflict humanity are not yetremoved; errors, and prejudices which perpetuate errors, have their advocates and partizans; and truth is known but to a few privileged individuals, and is still kept at an awful distance from the thrones of kings, it is the duty of the scholar and the sage to endeavour to eradicate the former, and to proclaim, support and illustrate the latter. If the lights they scatter are not useful in their own times, and their own country, they may enjoy the certainty of having served other countries and succeeding generations. Citizens of the world, they are contemporaries of every age, the universe is their fatherland, the earth is their school, and posterity will be their disciples. Gaetano Filangeri, The Science of Legislation [Translation by Richard Clayton, 1806] Abstract In the decades around the turn of the eighteenth century, Naples was capital of the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies and Europe’s third most populous city. From the early decades of the eighteenth to the end of the nineteenth century, the city spawned a school of intellectuals that, though predominantly juridical in cast, nevertheless displayed a surprisingly substantial openness to a new approach to the social sciences, which had developed above all in France, heavily influenced by the natural sciences and the experimental method. In harmony with Enlightenment thought, Gaetano Filangieri was the precursor, two centuries back, of the principles of indissoluble interaction between formal and informal institutions and economic development, between governance and social feedback, that are pillars of today’s school of institutional economics. His writings anticipated, in a number of respects, conceptual approaches adopted by later scholars. The present paper offers an institutional focus on his work, referring above all to Douglass North and his treatment of the role of the Glorious Revolution. 1 This paper is a thoroughly revised and extended version of Balzano and Vecchione (2015), Gaetano Filangieri e l’istituzionalismo economico, Rivista economica del Mezzogiorno, 29 (3-4), 583-612, Il Mulino, Bologna. We decided to extend and translate the original version because we believe that the work by Filangieri deserves an international visibility in the academic community. 1 1. Gaetano Filangieri: Life and historical context Gaetano Filangieri was a leading exponent of the Neapolitan Enlightenment, well known abroad and engaged in an epistolary relationship with Benjamin Franklin during the years of the American Declaration of Independence. His writings anticipated, in a number of respects, conceptual approaches adopted by later scholars.1 The present paper offers an institutional focus on his work, referring above all to Douglass North and his treatment of the role of the Glorious Revolution. After a brief biography in section one, his intellectual profile is traced in section two. Section three sets out the main aspects of his work, and section four connects his thought with the school of institutional economics. Section five recounts the events that led to the rise and fall of the Parthenopean Republic in 1799, and section six concludes. The third of eleven children of an ancient, noble house of Norman origin, Gaetano Filangieri (born Cercola, 1753, died Vico Equense, 1788), though he was given the traditional strict military education of the younger sons of the nobility, turned at a very young age to the study of law, philosophy and politics. In 1774, at just 22 years of age, he published his reflections on questions of domestic politics. His intelligent exposition won approval and agreement on many fronts, in Italy and abroad (Ferrone, 2003). The widespread praise for Filangieri drew the attention of the Bourbon court, and in 1777 he was named Majordomo of the Week and Gentleman of the Chamber, as well as Officer of the Royal Corps of “naval volunteers” at the service of King Ferdinand IV of Bourbon, the son of Charles III of Spain (Filangieri, 2003). During the formative years for Filangieri’s thought, the monarchies and principalities of Europe had to confront the ideas of liberalism and democracy espoused by the thinkers of the day, who were not dissuaded by the barriers of censorship, as Filangieri himself recalled: “ the obstacle now surmounted is by no means inconsiderable. We have assumed the right of thinking and writing with a freedom that does equal honor to the Princes who permit, and to the subjects who use their permission with propriety and advantage” (Filangieri, 2003, p. 3) [Translation by W. Kendall, 1791]. From Sweden to the Grand Duchy of Tuscany, from the Russia of Catherine the Great to the Austria of Maria Theresa of Habsburg, everywhere it was plain to see that the various sovereigns were seeking to digest the intellectual elaborations of English writers like Locke, Hume and Blackstone, which had fertilized the minds of such French philosophes as Montesquieu, Rousseau and Diderot, spreading then through the most of Europe. Subsequently labelled as enlightened despots, some of these sovereigns of the late eighteenth century were distinguished by their reformist ideas; their abandonment of the dogmas of crown and church and their advocacy of the principles of ratio drew them away from the anachronistic heritage of the Middle Ages. On such auspices of a renovation of 2 governments, Filangieri undertook his monumental Science of Legislation, in which the ideas of the enlightenment thinkers of Europe, but, above all, of thinkers close to his own life, like Giambattista Vico and Bernardo Tanucci,2 merged with his concrete experience of the Bourbon court. Filangieri’s entry into the royal entourage took him to the center of the artificial world of the courtesan, in close contact with the great corruption revolving around the Bourbon crown. The lack of a stable bourgeois class in mid-18th-century Naples (Cuoco, 1980), the survival of a feudalism that had already been abandoned in the northern part of Italy (V. Zamagni, 2017) and the feelings of mistrust and extraneousness with respect to public institutions (Macry, 2012) rendered the distance between the aristocracy and the average citizen, between the noble palaces and the misery of many city streets, palpable. All this, together with the evident conditions of degradation observable both in and outside the kingdom’s capital city, further underpinned the critical approach of his intellectual mission. The initial sections of the Science came out in 1780 (Filangieri, 2003). Unfortunately, Filangieri’s dedication to an ideal born in his youth and maintained with constancy soon had to reckon with health problems that worsened steadily with the passage of time. His marriage in 1783 with Countess Caroline Fremdel of Pressburg, who was in Naples in the entourage of Queen Maria Carolina of Austria, allowed him to move to the relative quiet of Cava dei Tirreni and rest from courtly society. During his absence from the Bourbon court, Filangieri unflaggingly composed new parts of his work, completing the third and fourth books, but without renouncing the company of friends and admirers; he made Cava the destination of an intellectual pilgrimage (D’Alessandro, 1994). Unfortunately, his courtly commitments tore him away from the solitude of Cava and brought him back into the royal entourage in 1787, to take part in the Supreme Council of Finance. He was therefore obliged to move back to the palace of his older brother Cesare in the heart of Naples. Unhappily, his failing health could not withstand the pace of his heavy courtly work load. So he decided to ask for a royal permit of leave in 1788 to go to Vico Equense, in the castle of his sister Teresa, a healthier environment. However, his health did not benefit as hoped from rest and the clean air of the peninsula of Sorrento, and on 21 July 1788, a few months after his arrival, he died in that castle at the age of just 35. 2. Gaetano Filangieri: civil enlightenment thinker In the decades around the turn of the eighteenth century, Naples was capital of the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies and Europe’s third most populous city, behind London and Paris (Malanima, 2006). From the early decades of the eighteenth to the end of the nineteenth century, the city spawned a school of intellectuals that, though predominantly juridical in cast, nevertheless displayed a 3 surprisingly substantial openness to a new approach to the social sciences, which had developed above all in France, heavily influenced by the natural sciences and the experimental method. The leading jurists thus began to grapple with political science, commerce, and the economy, at the same time as Adam Smith was drafting and publishing The Wealth of Nations, which laid the groundwork of modern economics (Amatucci, 2010). Antonio Genovesi, Gaetano Filangieri, Giacinto Dragonetti, and Ferdinando Galiani were some of the scholars who made eighteenth- century Naples a lively workshop of ideas, markedly liberal and egalitarian; together with their colleagues of the Milanese enlightenment, they founded the school of “civil economy.” This paradigm of economic thought fell into protracted oblivion, mostly because it was foreign to the Anglo-American mainstream of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries (Bruni and Zamagni, 2013). Among the major works of this period, certainly one of the most outstanding is Filangieri’s Science of Legislation, written between 1780 and 1788.
Recommended publications
  • New Working Papers Series, Entitled “Working Papers in Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics”
    Working Papers in Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics no. 74 the other canon foundation, Norway Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn Ragnar Nurkse Department of Innovation and Governance CONTACT: Rainer Kattel, [email protected]; Wolfgang Drechsler, [email protected]; Erik S. Reinert, [email protected] 80 Economic Bestsellers before 1850: A Fresh Look at the History of Economic Thought Erik S. Reinert, Kenneth Carpenter, Fernanda A. Reinert, Sophus A. Reinert* MAY 2017 * E. Reinert, Tallinn University of Technology & The Other Canon Foundation, Norway; K. Car- penter, former librarian, Harvard University; F. Reinert, The Other Canon Foundation, Norway; S. Reinert, Harvard Business School. The authors are grateful to Dr. Debra Wallace, Managing Director, Baker Library Services and, Laura Linard, Director of Baker Library Special Collections, at Harvard Business School, where the Historical Collection now houses what was once the Kress Library, for their cooperation in this venture. Above all our thanks go to Olga Mikheeva at Tallinn University of Technology for her very efficient research assistance. Antiquarian book dealers often have more information on economics books than do academics, and our thanks go to Wilhelm Hohmann in Stuttgart, Robert H. Rubin in Brookline MA, Elvira Tasbach in Berlin, and, above all, to Ian Smith in London. We are also grateful for advice from Richard van den Berg, Francesco Boldizzoni, Patrick O’Brien, Alexandre Mendes Cunha, Bertram Schefold and Arild Sæther. Corresponding author [email protected] The core and backbone of this publication consists of the meticulous work of Kenneth Carpenter, librarian of the Kress Library at Harvard Busi- ness School starting in 1968 and later Assistant Director for Research Resources in the Harvard University Library and the Harvard College 1 Library.
    [Show full text]
  • Works on Giambattista Vico in English from 1884 Through 2009
    Works on Giambattista Vico in English from 1884 through 2009 COMPILED BY MOLLY BLA C K VERENE TABLE OF CON T EN T S PART I. Books A. Monographs . .84 B. Collected Volumes . 98 C. Dissertations and Theses . 111 D. Journals......................................116 PART II. Essays A. Articles, Chapters, et cetera . 120 B. Entries in Reference Works . 177 C. Reviews and Abstracts of Works in Other Languages ..180 PART III. Translations A. English Translations ............................186 B. Reviews of Translations in Other Languages.........192 PART IV. Citations...................................195 APPENDIX. Bibliographies . .302 83 84 NEW VICO STUDIE S 27 (2009) PART I. BOOKS A. Monographs Adams, Henry Packwood. The Life and Writings of Giambattista Vico. London: Allen and Unwin, 1935; reprinted New York: Russell and Russell, 1970. REV I EWS : Gianturco, Elio. Italica 13 (1936): 132. Jessop, T. E. Philosophy 11 (1936): 216–18. Albano, Maeve Edith. Vico and Providence. Emory Vico Studies no. 1. Series ed. D. P. Verene. New York: Peter Lang, 1986. REV I EWS : Daniel, Stephen H. The Eighteenth Century: A Current Bibliography, n.s. 12 (1986): 148–49. Munzel, G. F. New Vico Studies 5 (1987): 173–75. Simon, L. Canadian Philosophical Reviews 8 (1988): 335–37. Avis, Paul. The Foundations of Modern Historical Thought: From Machiavelli to Vico. Beckenham (London): Croom Helm, 1986. REV I EWS : Goldie, M. History 72 (1987): 84–85. Haddock, Bruce A. New Vico Studies 5 (1987): 185–86. Bedani, Gino L. C. Vico Revisited: Orthodoxy, Naturalism and Science in the ‘Scienza nuova.’ Oxford: Berg, 1989. REV I EWS : Costa, Gustavo. New Vico Studies 8 (1990): 90–92.
    [Show full text]
  • FRENCH REVOLUTION PART 3 from the Directory 1794-1799 To
    FRENCH REVOLUTION PART 3 From the Directory 1794-1799 to Napoleon Bonaparte The Terror July 1793-July 1794 Robespierre and the Committee of Public Safety Inscription on Engraving from 1795, after pyramid: Thermidor “Here lies all Robespierre guillotines the France.” executioner, after all France has been guillotined Constitutions of 1791 and 1793 are beneath his feet COUP D’ĖTAT OF THERMIDOR JULY Execution of Robespierre, 1794 Saint Just, Couthon July 1794 End of the Jacobin Terror, start of White Terror" -- execution of 72 leading Jacobins in one day The Directory takes power 1794- 1799 The Directory: July 1794-1799 Paul Barras one of the five Directors making up the executive council Legislature under Directory is Drawing of bicameral: member of Council of Council of Elders = upper house Elders -- pseudo-Roman Council of 500 = lower house robes Constitution of the Year V 1795 Third constitution – one every two years 1791, 1793 Ends universal male suffrage Indirect elections (electoral college like USA) Bicameral legislature upper house as more elite restraint on lower house LOUIS XVII -- never reigned son & heir of Louis XVI & Marie Antoinette b. 1785 d. 1795 June in prison of illness at age 10 (age 8 at time of Marie Antoinette’s trial) Set back for royalist hopes for restoration of monarchy – but the eventual Louis XVIII restored in 1814 was the brother (in exile since 1792) of King Louis XVI executed in Jan 1793. REVOLT OF GERMINAL (Spring 1795): Parisian sans culottes riot, call for "bread & Constitution of 1793," but no more political
    [Show full text]
  • Public Happiness As the Wealth of Nations: the Rise of Political Economy in Naples in a Comparative Perspective
    Public Happiness as the Wealth of Nations: The Rise of Political Economy in Naples in a Comparative Perspective Filippo Sabetti The professed object of Dr. Adam Smith’ inquiry is the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. There is another inquiry, however, perhaps still more interesting, which he occasionally mixes with it, I mean an inquiry into the causes which affect the happiness of nations. (Malthus 1798: 303, quoted in Bruni and Porta 2005, 1) The rise of political economy in eighteenth-century Naples was as much a response to the economic conditions of the realm as it was an effort to absorb, modify, and give a hand to the scientific and human progress agitating Transalpine currents of thought. The emerging political economy in Naples stands out in part because its calls for reform and for the creation of a commercial and manufacturing society were not a radical break or rupture with the past. The recognition of the capacity of a commercial society to create wealth was accompanied by the equally important recognition that market transactions between individuals could be perceived both as mutually beneficial exchanges and as genuine social interactions that carried moral value by virtue of the social content. Whereas the Scottish Enlightenment sought to isolate market relationships from other relationships and to separate the concept of a well-governed state from the ideal of the virtuous citizen, the Neapolitan Enlightenment continued to embed the economy in social relations, arguing that good institutions could not function in the absence of good men. Individual happiness was derived from making others happy and not from the accumulation of things.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Napoleon Buonaparte
    THE HISTORY OF NAPOLEON BUONAPARTE JOHN GIBSON LOCKHART CHAPTER I BIRTH AND PARENTAGE OF NAPOLEON BUONAPARTE—HIS EDUCATION AT BRIENNE AND AT PARIS—HIS CHARACTER AT THIS PERIOD—HIS POLITICAL PREDILECTIONS—HE ENTERS THE ARMY AS SECOND LIEUTENANT OF ARTILLERY—HIS FIRST MILITARY SERVICE IN CORSICA IN 1793. Napoleon Buonaparte was born at Ajaccio on the 15th of August, 1769. The family had been of some distinction, during the middle ages, in Italy; whence his branch of it removed to Corsica, in the troubled times of the Guelphs and Gibellines. They were always considered as belonging to the gentry of the island. Charles, the father of Napoleon, an advocate of considerable reputation, married his mother, Letitia Ramolini, a young woman eminent for beauty and for strength of mind, during the civil war— when the Corsicans, under Paoli, were struggling to avoid the domination of the French. The advocate had espoused the popular side in that contest, and his lovely and high-spirited wife used to attend him through the toils and dangers of his mountain campaigns. Upon the termination of the war, he would have exiled himself along with Paoli; but his relations dissuaded him from this step, and he was afterwards reconciled to the conquering party, and protected and patronised by the French governor of Corsica, the Count de Marbœuff. It is said that Letitia had attended mass on the morning of the 15th of August; and, being seized suddenly on her return, gave birth to the future hero of his age, on a temporary couch covered with tapestry, representing the heroes of the Iliad.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Build a Dissident Public Order. Actors and Strategies of the Neapolitan Folks' Political Mobilization During the 1848
    How to build a dissident public order. Actors and strategies of the Neapolitan folks’ political mobilization during the 1848 revolution Pierre-Marie Delpu To cite this version: Pierre-Marie Delpu. How to build a dissident public order. Actors and strategies of the Neapolitan folks’ political mobilization during the 1848 revolution. Rechtskultur - Zeitschrift für Europäische Rechtsgeschichte/European Journal of Legal History/Journal européen d’histoire du droit, Edition Rechtskultur, 2019, pp.145-161. 10.36213/8-8. halshs-03156967 HAL Id: halshs-03156967 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-03156967 Submitted on 9 Mar 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. How to build a dissident public order. Actors and strategies of the Neapolitan folks’ political mobilization during the 1848 revolution Pierre-Marie Delpu When revolution broke out in Palermo on January 12 1848 and then spread throughout the whole Kingdom of the Two Sicilies, it constituted the first experience of massive po- litical mobilization in the state. It followed from a long tradition of riots and revolutions since the Early Modern period1, and very quickly became part of a wider revolutionary wave, both Italian and European, and mainly characterised by the delegitimation of the Bourbon monarchy as an institution and as a means of government.
    [Show full text]
  • Indice General
    Indice general Volumen II: Juristas modernos — Relación de abreviaturas y siglas especiales 13 TERCERA PARTE: JURISTAS DE LOS SIGLOS XVI Y xvn 21 — Introducción (Alejandro Guzmán) 23 — Semblanzas Ulrico Zasio (Udalricus Zasius; Muldricus Zasius; Ulrich Zäsy) 89 Nicülaas EveraertS (Nicolaus Everardi) 92 Johann von Schwarzenberg 95 Guillaume Budé (Budaeus) 97 Tomás Diplovatacio (Tommaso Diplovataccio, Thomas Diplovatatius) 101 Nicolás Maquiavelo (Niccolö Machiavelli) 106 Tomás (Je Vio (Cajetanus) (Tommaso de Vio Gaetano; Cardenal Cayetano) . Ill Anthony Fitzherbert 114 Tomás Moro (Sir Thomas More) 116 Francisco de Vitoria 121 Martín Lutero (Martin Luther) 128 Johann Apel (Johannes Apell o Apellus) 130 Pierre Rebuffe (Rebuffus; Rebuffi) 132 André Tiraqueau (Andreas Tiraquellus) 134 Johann Oldendorp 137 Claude Chansonnette (Claudius Cantiuncula) 140 Gregorio López 142 Andrea AlciatO (Giovanni Andrea Alciati; Andreas Alciatus) 147 Martín de Azpilcueta (Doctor Navarro; Doctor Navamis) 150 Eguiner Baron (Eguinaire François Baron de Kerlouan, Eguinarius) 155 Alfonso de Castro 157 Domingo de Soto 160 Bonifacius Amerbach 166 5 JURISTAS UNIVERSALES Johann Sichardt - 168 Gabriel van der Muy den (Gabriel Mudacus) 171 Charles Dumoulin (Charles du Moulin; Molinaeus) 174 Gregor Haloander (Gregorius Haloandrus) 177 Melchior Kling 180 François Connan (Franciscus Connanus) - 183 François Le Douaren (Francisco Duarcno; Franciscus Duarenus) 185 Melchor Cano •• Benvenulo Stracca (Benvenutus Straccha) 191 Juan de Matienzo 193 Fernando Vázquez de Menchaca 198
    [Show full text]
  • Sir William Hamilton KB, PC, FRS, FRSE (13 December 1730 – 6 April 1803)
    Sir William Hamilton KB, PC, FRS, FRSE (13 December 1730 – 6 April 1803) Married Emma Hart (Lyon) at St Marylebone Parish Church on 6 September 1791 Sir William Hamilton was a Scottish diplomat, antiquarian, archaeologist and vulcanologist. After a short period as a Member of Parliament, he served as British Ambassador to the Kingdom of Naples from 1764 to 1800. He studied the volcanoes Vesuvius and Etna, becoming a Fellow of the Royal Society and recipient of the Copley Medal. His second wife was Emma Hamilton, famed as Horatio Nelson's mistress. Hamilton was born on 13 December 1730 (or 12 January 1731) in either London or at Park Place, Berkshire, the fourth son of Lord Archibald Hamilton, governor of Jamaica and seventh son of the 3rd Duchess of Hamilton, and Lady Jane Hamilton, daughter of James Hamilton, 6th Earl of Abercorn. His mother was a favourite, and possibly a mistress, of the Prince of Wales and William grew up with his son George III, who would call him his "foster brother". At age nine, he went to Westminster School, where he made lifelong friends of Frederick Hervey and David Murray. Hamilton used to say that he was born with an ancient name and a thousand pounds; as a younger son he would have to make his own way in life. So, six weeks after his sixteenth birthday, he was commissioned into the 3rd Foot Guards as an ensign. He spent some time with the regiment in the Netherlands, and advanced to lieutenant in 1753. In September 1757 he was present as aide-de-camp to General Henry Seymour Conway at the abortive attack on Rochefort.
    [Show full text]
  • C a T H O L I C C H U R C H
    EC A TP H OI L IP C H A C HN U R CY H Fourth Sunday of Easter April 25, 2021 recently passed away from Covid-19. Our thoughts and prayers FROM POPE FRANCIS are with Don Romagnuolo, his family, friends and brethren, as well as the parishioners at Casamari. Requiescat in pace. NEW BLESSEDS OF CASAMARI Dear brothers and sisters, On April 17 in the Abbey of Casamari, Simeon Cardon and five companion martyrs, Cistercian monks of that Ab- bey, were proclaimed Blessed. In 1799, when French soldiers with- drawing from Naples sacked churches and monasteries, these meek disciples of Christ resisted with heroic courage, unto death, to defend the Eucharist from desecration. May their example spur us to a greater commitment of fidelity to God, even capable of transforming society and making it more just and fraternal. A round of applause for the new Blesseds! During the French invasion of the Kingdom of Naples in 1798, Napoleon’s Grande Armée installed the short-lived and widely unpopular Parthenopean Republic, a treacherous Franco- Jacobin satellite state propped up with French bayonets. Though Sicily remained in control of the Bourbons, the brutal conquest of the Neapolitan portion of the Kingdom was violent and bloody, and as so often is the case with anti-Bourbon his- torians, the abominable crimes of the Republic receive little to no attention in comparison to the loyalists’ reprisals. Among the many atrocities committed by the so-called “enlightened” conquerors, was the massacre of six Cistercian friars on May 13, 1799 at the Gothic Abbey of Casamari, bor- dering the Papal States.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberalism in Brazil · Econ Journal Watch
    Discuss this article at Journaltalk: https://journaltalk.net/articles/6019 ECON JOURNAL WATCH 17(2) September 2020: 405–441 Liberalism in Brazil Lucas Berlanza1 LINK TO ABSTRACT Brazil is the largest country in South America and the fifth-largest in the world by area, sixth by population. It is noted for its soccer and popular celebrations. It is also known for its undeniable problems. And it is one of the most closed and regulated economies on the planet. The Economic Freedom Index published by the Fraser Institute rates 162 countries for the year 2017. In that listing, Brazil comes in 120th place (Gwartney et al. 2019, 9). Brazil was under Portugal’s power for centuries, becoming a united kingdom under a traditional monarchy in 1815. It became a constitutional monarchy after its independence in 1822; a republic controlled by oligarchies after a coup d’état in 1889; a dictatorship in the 1930s; it tried to maintain a constitutional democracy between 1946 and 1964; and it was a military regime between 1964 and 1985. Then the current democratic period began, called the New Republic. Regardless of the period, the same kinds of challenges were experienced, varying only by degree. Economic problems like inflation, public debt, and excessive regulation are a constant in Brazilian history, appearing in all of its historical periods and political regimes. Brazilian intellectuals have blamed Brazil’s troubles on several cultural char- acteristics. One of them is the prevalence of patrimonialism, a system “in which the leader organizes his political power as the exercise of his domestic management” (Medard 1991, 326).2 Brazil’s history is marked by many military coups, dictatorial cycles, and chronic economic statism.
    [Show full text]
  • ORU History & Humanities Modern World
    Oral Roberts University Digital Showcase Textbooks Educational Materials 2019 ORU History & Humanities Modern World - Reader I 1600 - 1850 Gary Pranger Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalshowcase.oru.edu/textbooks Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Pranger, Gary, "ORU History & Humanities Modern World - Reader I 1600 - 1850" (2019). Textbooks. 1. https://digitalshowcase.oru.edu/textbooks/1 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Educational Materials at Digital Showcase. It has been accepted for inclusion in Textbooks by an authorized administrator of Digital Showcase. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ORU HISTORY & HUMANITIES MODERN WORLD - READER I 1600 - 1850 Gary K. Pranger, Editor 1 THE MODERN WORLD I 1600-1850 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE 5 1. INTRODUCTION AND GENERAL OVERVIEW 7 2. TIME LINE 3. THE RENAISSANCE Gary K. Pranger 12 4. THE REFORMATION Gary K. Pranger 20 5. RESTORATION & GLORIOUS REVOLUTION Harold Paul & Gary K. Pranger 46 6. EUROPE AND FRANCE 1600-1715 J. Franklin Sexton & Gary K. Pranger 54 7. NEOCLASSICAL LITERATURE David Ringer 80 8. THE ENLIGHTENMENT Gary K. Pranger 90 9. THE LASTING SIGNIFICANCE OF THE ENLIGHTENMENT L. Lee Peterson & Gary K. Pranger 96 10. THE GERMAN EMPIRE AFTER 1648: PRUSSIA & AUSTRIA Gary K. Pranger 113 11. 18TH CENTURY STATE COMPETITION 1713-1763 J. Franklin Sexton 132 12. ECONOMICS & HISTORY Gary K. Pranger 136 13. MARX & MARXISM: IDEAL AND REALITY 148 14. THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY NOVEL Carl Hamilton 157 15. METHODISM Harold J. Paul 163 16. THE FIRST GREAT AWAKENING Gary K. Pranger 176 17. GREAT BRITAIN & THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION 1763-1815 J.
    [Show full text]
  • EIGHTEENTH CENTURY HUMANITARIANISM: Collaboration "Between Surope and ^America HE Growth of a Humanitarian Spirit Is Clearly in Evidence in the Eighteenth Century
    EIGHTEENTH CENTURY HUMANITARIANISM: Collaboration "Between Surope and ^America HE growth of a humanitarian spirit is clearly in evidence in the eighteenth century. Much of its literature inspired it, as well Tas reflected it, and a number of organizations aimed to ame- liorate the sad lot of mankind. One of the hardest fights was against Negro slavery and the slave trade, and the most forceful campaigners in this struggle were the Quakers of England and America. The spirit and the letter of legislation affecting bonded whites was also affected by eighteenth century rationalism and humanity. But even before their influence was felt, a new world community that valued the life of man more highly than the old world demanded less fre- quently the ultimate penalty. Subject as it naturally was to English precedents, the colonial code reduced the great many offences still punishable by death in England to eleven in Massachusetts. These New England Puritans were more humane, too, in drawing up laws protecting women, children, strangers, servants, and dumb animals. Almost alone among the seventeenth century legislators, Preserved Smith notes, "the Massachusetts General Court forbade any man to exercise any tyranny or cruelty toward any brute creature which are usually kept for man's use."1 More fundamental changes in the character of the laws did not come until after the epoch-making works of Montesquieu and Bec- caria. Stemming from these sources there accumulated a number of plans and discussions that called for a reconsideration of legal systems, particularly with reference to crime and punishment. Jefferson made a careful study of William Eden's "Principles of Venal J^aw (London, 1772), and into his Common Vlace "Book the young Virginian copied long passages from On Qrimes and Punishments and extracts from Montesquieu.
    [Show full text]