17. the United Nations: FDR and the Creation of the Postwar World Fdr4freedoms 2

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

17. the United Nations: FDR and the Creation of the Postwar World Fdr4freedoms 2 fdr4freedoms 1 In the months before his untimely death in April 1945, having led the United States to the brink of victory in World War II, Franklin 17. The United D. Roosevelt was determined to use the catalyst of global conflict to fashion a postwar world organized not by lawless Nations: FDR and violence but by respect and cooperation among nations. In October 1944, as the Allies stood poised for the final assault on the German homeland, FDR spoke to Americans the Creation of the about the next great challenge: “waging peace.” He urged them to support the international peacekeeping organization whose basic shape had been hammered out by the major Postwar World Allies only weeks before at Dumbarton Oaks in Washington, DC. He reminded them how strong had been the inclination among some Americans to maintain a pristine disengagement from world affairs and avoid entanglement in the war at just about any cost. Joining the battle to defend their country and its ideals had, in the end, risen “from the hearts and souls and sinews of the American people,” FDR observed, and the An aerial view of New York City showing, at left, the experience had left them a “seasoned and mature” people with white-edged Secretariat Building of the United Nations a newly prominent role to play in the world. headquarters complex on the shore of the East River. At the tip of the East River’s Roosevelt Island is the Franklin “The power which this Nation has attained—the political, D. Roosevelt Four Freedoms Park. Opened in 2012, this the economic, the military, and above all the moral power—has memorial to FDR in his home state affords visitors a unique vantage on the international peacekeeping organization he brought to us the responsibility, and with it the opportunity, for worked for many years to establish. Iwan Baan leadership in the community of Nations,” FDR said. “It is our IV. Statesman & Commander in Chief: FDR in World War II 17. The United Nations: FDR and the Creation of the Postwar World fdr4freedoms 2 another even more cataclysmic war—World War III—the root causes of this destructive conflagration must be addressed. Nearly a year before Pearl Harbor, as the Nazis exulted in their conquest of continental Europe, FDR, in his historic January 1941 State of the Union address, gave Americans his sense of what was at stake in the conflict: either the dictators’ “new order of tyranny” would soon dominate the world, enslaving the great democracies, perhaps for generations, or “a greater conception— the moral order” would triumph. The essence of this moral order, FDR said, lay not in obscure partisan interests (later that month an unhinged Adolf Hitler would label the Allies a “Jewish-international- capitalist clique”), but in the establishment “everywhere in the world” of four fundamental human freedoms: freedom of speech and expression, freedom of worship, freedom from want, and freedom from fear. Even as Nazi Germany, fascist Italy, and Imperial Japan joined forces to menace the globe, FDR assured the American people that this better world was “attainable in our own time and generation.” He worked assiduously to attain it, always careful to emphasize ultimate goals in his wartime rhetoric, and, on a practical level, orchestrating a series of meetings, conferences, and declarations that ultimately led to the establishment of the United Nations (UN) and the post-1945 multilateral order that prevails to this day. It took a quarter century for FDR’s ideas about international cooperation to come to fruition. Sadly, he died on April 12, 1945, just a few months before the Allies celebrated a final victory over fascism in both Europe and Asia, A New Deal poster promoting Franklin D. Roosevelt’s Four affairs. As a top navy official, he’d been and little more than six months before nations Freedoms, first presented in his January 1941 State of the a passionate advocate for the League of of goodwill formally founded the UN he had Union speech. During that year preceding America’s entry Nations, which was established after World envisioned for so many years. But the legacy of into World War II, FDR worked to define the Allies’ cause by describing the world they would fight to establish—a War I to keep the peace, and he was bitterly his work would be very long lasting indeed. world organized by liberal values that stood in sharp disappointed when the U.S. Senate refused “Take a look at our present world,” the contrast to the ideals of dictators. LOC to join the fledgling organization in 1919, historian Arthur Schlesinger Jr. said in 1998. weakening it substantially. “It is manifestly not Adolf Hitler’s world. His own best interest, and in the name of peace Almost from the moment warfare erupted Thousand-Year Reich turned out to have a and humanity, this Nation cannot, must not, once again in Europe in September 1939, brief and bloody run of a dozen years. It is and will not shirk that responsibility.” FDR as president dedicated himself and manifestly not Joseph Stalin’s world. That A worldly person who traveled extensively his administration to the larger purpose of ghastly world self-destructed before our eyes. even as a child, FDR had always believed that establishing a safer and more just world after Nor is it Winston Churchill’s world. Empire nations were inexorably linked by a web of the peace. Military victory for the Allies, and its glories have long since vanished into overlapping interests and that America should though an immediate and crucial goal, was history. The world we live in today is Franklin therefore take an active part in international not enough. If the world hoped to prevent Roosevelt’s world.” IV. Statesman & Commander in Chief: FDR in World War II 17. The United Nations: FDR and the Creation of the Postwar World fdr4freedoms 3 A Woodrow Wilson and the League of Nations In February 1919, World War I recently On this trip, Wilson’s steps were dogged concluded, Franklin D. Roosevelt and Eleanor by antileague senators Hiram Johnson of Roosevelt sailed home from Europe after California and William Borah of Idaho, who a trip of several weeks during which FDR, spoke against the treaty with a passion equal as undersecretary of the navy, had been to Wilson’s. In the Senate, Borah memorably responsible for demobilizing the American invoked Thomas Jefferson’s warning against fleet. They shared the journey with President “entangling alliances” with foreign nations. Woodrow Wilson, who had been in Paris The isolationists’ main concern was that the negotiating the Treaty of Versailles, which league’s charter would compel America to go set the terms of peace, and in particular to war in defense of other member nations. pressing for the inclusion of a charter that Wilson suffered a major stroke in November, would found the League of Nations. This and the Senate rejected the treaty (and the charter called on member nations to protect League of Nations) in November and again in one another’s political independence and March 1920. territorial integrity from external aggression, America was becoming an ever-more- to reduce armaments, and to submit to an powerful player on the world stage, and its executive council any disputes likely to lead refusal to join the league compromised the to war. It also established a World Court. organization’s perceived muscularity. On Wilson ardently believed the league could several occasions member nations proved help prevent future wars. FDR agreed. The unwilling to take strong action to check mood aboard ship was hopeful, ebullient aggressors, including the Japanese when they even. But the balance of the year would bring invaded Manchuria in 1931 and the Italians great disappointment. when they attacked Ethiopia in 1935. Japan After signing the treaty in July, and Germany dropped out of the league in Wilson presented it to the U.S. Senate 1933. Italy followed in 1937. for ratification, telling senators that the In planning for an international agreement had been set in motion “by no peacekeeping organization during the 1940s, plan of our conceiving, but by the hand of FDR learned from these earlier failures. God.” This remark represented but one He supported a veto power for permanent example (albeit extreme) of the way Wilson members of the United Nations (UN) Security pushed the treaty and its League of Nations Council, a reassurance to the United States with an insistence that failed to take account and other permanent members that their of mounting opposition. He had broken with sovereignty would not be compromised. tradition by traveling personally to negotiate He made sure a bipartisan U.S. delegation the treaty, and when the Senate appeared attended the 1945 San Francisco Conference divided over it, Wilson, though quite ill, took establishing the UN. And he helped ensure UN to the road in September 1919 to take his actions would not require unanimous member cause to the American people. consent, a rule that had stymied the League of Nations in moving against aggressor states. IV. Statesman & Commander in Chief: FDR in World War II 17. The United Nations: FDR and the Creation of the Postwar World fdr4freedoms 4 Left: The Atlantic Charter, issued as B a leaflet by the United States Office of War Information. Signed by only two people—Franklin D. Roosevelt The Atlantic Charter, and British prime minister Winston Churchill—the document laid out the Allies’ basic aspirations for a postwar August 1941 world in August 1941, months before America entered World War II. University of North Texas Over the course of four days in August 1941, Below: Franklin D.
Recommended publications
  • Crager on Burkman, 'Japan and the League of Nations: Empire and World Order, 1914-1938'
    H-US-Japan Crager on Burkman, 'Japan and the League of Nations: Empire and World Order, 1914-1938' Review published on Wednesday, March 11, 2009 Thomas W. Burkman. Japan and the League of Nations: Empire and World Order, 1914-1938. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2008. xv + 289 pp. $58.00 (cloth), ISBN 978-0-8248-2982-7. Reviewed by Kelly E. Crager (Texas Tech University)Published on H-US-Japan (March, 2009) Commissioned by Yone Sugita Japanese Interwar Diplomacy In Japan and the League of Nations, Thomas W. Burkman recounts the history of Japan's foreign affairs from the close of World War I through the beginning of the Second Sino-Japanese War. Traditional understanding of Japan's role in the world during this era has been grossly simplified, according to the author, and a new and more balanced treatment of this topic was necessary to help bring about a fuller understanding of the developments in East Asia and the Pacific region prior to the Second World War. Although generally considered to have been an aggressive world power that largely eschewed international involvement to pursue its national interests, the empire, as Burkman insists, was very much committed to the promotion of ideals espoused by Woodrow Wilson and embodied in the League of Nations. Even though the Japanese readily embraced internationalist ideas, and participated fully, Japanese internationalism was influenced by peculiarly Japanese ideas concerning power and place. The author believes that when Wilsonian internationalism began to wane and when the economic pressures of the global depression began to set in, Japanese policymakers sought to protect national interests in the region rather than holding fast to internationalist policies that would make the empire vulnerable to foreign powers.
    [Show full text]
  • UNDER ORDERS: War Crimes in Kosovo Order Online
    UNDER ORDERS: War Crimes in Kosovo Order online Table of Contents Acknowledgments Introduction Glossary 1. Executive Summary The 1999 Offensive The Chain of Command The War Crimes Tribunal Abuses by the KLA Role of the International Community 2. Background Introduction Brief History of the Kosovo Conflict Kosovo in the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia Kosovo in the 1990s The 1998 Armed Conflict Conclusion 3. Forces of the Conflict Forces of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia Yugoslav Army Serbian Ministry of Internal Affairs Paramilitaries Chain of Command and Superior Responsibility Stucture and Strategy of the KLA Appendix: Post-War Promotions of Serbian Police and Yugoslav Army Members 4. march–june 1999: An Overview The Geography of Abuses The Killings Death Toll,the Missing and Body Removal Targeted Killings Rape and Sexual Assault Forced Expulsions Arbitrary Arrests and Detentions Destruction of Civilian Property and Mosques Contamination of Water Wells Robbery and Extortion Detentions and Compulsory Labor 1 Human Shields Landmines 5. Drenica Region Izbica Rezala Poklek Staro Cikatovo The April 30 Offensive Vrbovac Stutica Baks The Cirez Mosque The Shavarina Mine Detention and Interrogation in Glogovac Detention and Compusory Labor Glogovac Town Killing of Civilians Detention and Abuse Forced Expulsion 6. Djakovica Municipality Djakovica City Phase One—March 24 to April 2 Phase Two—March 7 to March 13 The Withdrawal Meja Motives: Five Policeman Killed Perpetrators Korenica 7. Istok Municipality Dubrava Prison The Prison The NATO Bombing The Massacre The Exhumations Perpetrators 8. Lipljan Municipality Slovinje Perpetrators 9. Orahovac Municipality Pusto Selo 10. Pec Municipality Pec City The “Cleansing” Looting and Burning A Final Killing Rape Cuska Background The Killings The Attacks in Pavljan and Zahac The Perpetrators Ljubenic 11.
    [Show full text]
  • The Consideration of the Yalta Conference As an Executive Agreement
    University of Nebraska at Omaha DigitalCommons@UNO Student Work 8-1-1973 The consideration of the Yalta Conference as an executive agreement John Brayman University of Nebraska at Omaha Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/studentwork Recommended Citation Brayman, John, "The consideration of the Yalta Conference as an executive agreement" (1973). Student Work. 372. https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/studentwork/372 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UNO. It has been accepted for inclusion in Student Work by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE CONSIDERATION OF THE YALTA CONFERENCE AS AN EXECUTIVE AGREEMENT A Thesis Presented to the Department of History and the Faculty of the Graduate College University of Nebraska at Omaha In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts John Brayman August, 1973 UMI Number: EP73010 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI EP73010 Published by ProQuest LLC (2015). Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code ProQuest ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 THESIS ACCEPTANCE Accepted for fee facility of The Graduate College of fee University of Nebraska at Omaha, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts, Graduate Committee: Name Departmin Chairman THE CONSITERATION GP :THS YALTA CONFERENCE AS AN EXECUTIVE AGREEMENT : The story of the Yalta Conference is a complex and a difficult one.
    [Show full text]
  • The Atlantic Charter (1941). Source: Samuel Rosenman (Ed.), Public Papers and Addresses of Franklin D
    THE ATLANTIC CHARTER (1941). SOURCE: SAMUEL ROSENMAN (ED.), PUBLIC PAPERS AND ADDRESSES OF FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT, VOL. 10, 1938-1950, 314 The President of the United States of America and the Prime Minister, Mr. Churchill, representing His Majesty's Government in the United Kingdom, being met together, deem it right to make known cer- tain common principles in the national policies of their respective countries on which they base their hopes for a better future for the world. First, their countries seek no aggrandizement, territorial or other; Second, they desire to see no territorial changes that do not accord with the freely expressed wishes of the peoples concerned; Third, they respect the right of all peoples to choose the form of government under which they will live; and they wish to see sovereign rights and self government restored to those who have been forci- bly deprived of them; Fourth, they will endeavor, with due respect for their existing obligations, to further the enjoyment by all States, great or small, victor or vanquished, of access, on equal terms, to the trade and to the raw materials of the world which are needed for their economic prosperity; Fifth, they desire to bring about the fullest collaboration between all nations in the economic field with the object of securing, for all, improved labor standards, economic advancement and social security; Sixth, after the final destruction of the Nazi tyranny, they hope to see established a peace which will afford to all nations the means of dwelling in safety within their own boundaries, and which will afford assurance that all the men in all the lands may live out their lives in freedom from fear and want; Seventh, such a peace should enable all men to traverse the high seas and oceans without hindrance; Eighth, they believe that all of the nations of the world, for realistic as well as spiritual reasons must come to the abandonment of the use of force.
    [Show full text]
  • Experience the Round of Roosevelt!
    Experience the Round of Roosevelt! Brasserie-Restaurant Huys van Roosevelt in Oud-Vossemeer One of the most popular activities that is arranged for our guests from all over the world is the ‘Round of Roosevelt’. The ancestors of the former presidents of the United States of America, Theodore and Franklin Delano Roosevelt and his spouse Eleanor Roosevelt, descent from Oud-Vossemeer. The ‘Four Freedoms monument’ While taking a cultural walk through the old centre of the homey Zealandish village, our guide will take you to several sights that memorialize the roots of the Roosevelt family. Furthermore you will be visiting the exposition at the Roosevelt information centre and the place where the ancestors of the legendary world leaders used to live. The cultural promenade is a legitimate recommendation for everyone who’s interested in the history of Oud- Vossemeer and the special history of the Roosevelt family. The Roosevelt information centre Brasserie-Restaurant Huys van Roosevelt A home for everybody Experience the Round of Roosevelt! Costs and general information • The costs of the Round of Roosevelt including lunch are €27,- p.p. • The costs for the Round of Roosevelt including dinner are €38,50 p.p. • The lunch as well as the dinner pertains that you are able to choose between two dishes. The Roosevelt information centre • The Round of Roosevelt can be booked during the entire year from Activity with lunch Monday to Saturday by groups that exist of at least six people. You will be welcomed by our guide at Huys van Roose- • With reference to the visit to the velt.
    [Show full text]
  • 381 Part 117—Drawbridge Operation
    Coast Guard, DOT Pt. 117 c. Betterments llll $llll other than an order of apportionment, Expected savings in repair or maintenance nor relieve any bridge owner of any li- costs: ability or penalty under other provi- a. Repair llll $llll b. Maintenance llll $llll sions of that act. Costs attributable to requirements of rail- [CGD 91±063, 60 FR 20902, Apr. 28, 1995, as road and/or highway traffic llll amended by CGD 96±026, 61 FR 33663, June 28, $llll 1996; CGD 97±023, 62 FR 33363, June 19, 1997] Expenditure for increased carrying capacity llll $llll Expired service life of old bridge llll PART 117ÐDRAWBRIDGE $llll OPERATION REGULATIONS Subtotal llll $llll Share to be borne by the bridge owner Subpart AÐGeneral Requirements llll $llll Contingencies llll $llll Sec. Total llll $llll 117.1 Purpose. Share to be borne by the United States 117.3 Applicability. llll $llll 117.4 Definitions. Contingencies llll $llll 117.5 When the draw shall open. Total llll $llll 117.7 General duties of drawbridge owners and tenders. (d) The Order of Apportionment of 117.9 Delaying opening of a draw. Costs will include the guaranty of 117.11 Unnecessary opening of the draw. costs. 117.15 Signals. 117.17 Signalling for contiguous draw- § 116.55 Appeals. bridges. (a) Except for the decision to issue an 117.19 Signalling when two or more vessels are approaching a drawbridge. Order to Alter, if a complainant dis- 117.21 Signalling for an opened drawbridge. agrees with a recommendation regard- 117.23 Installation of radiotelephones. ing obstruction or eligibility made by a 117.24 Radiotelephone installation identi- District Commander, or the Chief, Of- fication.
    [Show full text]
  • 5.4 Origins of the Cold
    Origins of the Cold War Truman is NOT FDR • Didn’t trust Stalin & did not feel connection to Allies – Doesn’t listen to WC on keeping troops east of line to see what Stalin will do in SoIà Withdraws troops to line & UK follows. – Thinks he can mediate like FDR • Stalin: Why do these silly Americans negotiate E.EUR on moral/legal grounds? Objective reality. Potsdam Conference • July-Aug, 1945 in eastern GER • New Big Three: Stalin, Truman, Attlee • $20B in GER reparations (1/2 to USSR) • Neisse River confusion; USSR obviously wants eastern one to make POL smaller • Stalin wants, but doesn’t get: – Base in Bosporus, Soviet trusteeship of ITA-Afr. Colonies, four- power control of Ruhr, Western recognition of Soviet govs. in ROM & BUL • Agreement: Four powers take reparations out of Zones, W. Neisse border, Stalin helps w/JPN Truman’s Journal 8/2/1945 Peace? • Sept.-Dec. 1945 – Foreign ministers meet to draw up peace treaties for FIN, HUN, ROM, BUL – Stalin accepts some democratic measures in E.EURà Basically lies. • No more Four Policemen idea • KISSINGER: Despite losing 20M people in WWII 20M in purges, and devastating W. RUS, Stalin was aggressive and had no fear of bomb. Didn’t think US would use it. – Aggressive pro-war propaganda campaign post-war because he realized USSR couldn’t exist w/ a peaceful foreign policy Iron Curtain • 3/5/1946 – Churchill gives “Iron Curtain” speech – Russians will control E.EUR, US/UK need to ally and avoid war at all costs – Sept. 1947 – Cominform – group of worldwide Communist parties in FIN, YUG, POL, CZE, ALB, BUL, ROM, HUN George Kennan • Leading anti-Soviet advisor under HST – E.EUR occupation inevitable b/c USSR forces already occupied area – BUT believed USSR couldn’t maintain domination – AMBROSE: All his predictions come true, but not for four decades – “Long Telegram” (1946) – “[USSR needed to be] contained by the adroit and vigilant application of counterforce at a series of constantly shifting geographical and political points”à Foundation for Truman Doctrine (“Containment”) Brisk • Amb.
    [Show full text]
  • May 2012 [.Pdf]
    CMU’S NEWS SOURCE FOR FACULTY & STAFF 5/12 ISSUE 2 S ILICON V ALLEY C AMPU S C ELEBRATE S D ECA D E OF S UCCE ss 4 QATAR ANNOUNCES CAMPUS SERVICE Hats Off! WINNERS 9 E A S T H ARLEM S TU D ENT S V I S IT CMU, P ITT 11 M EC H ANICAL E NGINEERING R ECOGNIZE D BY L EAGUE OF A MERICAN B ICYCLI S T S Breaking Ground Innovative Hub To House Biomedical, Nanotechnology, Energy Research n Bruce Gerson Carnegie Mellon’s recently approved 10-year master plan won’t be gathering dust anytime soon. The first building to be built under ELLON QATAR the new plan is a new research facility M that will house the Biomedical Engi- neering Department; an energy institute CARNEGIE focused on developing technologies to F Y O improve energy production, efficiency S and sustainability; and a nanotechnology fabrication lab, with space for approxi- HOTO COURTE mately 200 faculty members, researchers P and graduate students. Scheduled to break ground in the M EMBERS OF THE C A RNEGIE M ELLON IN Q A T A R C L A SS OF 2 0 1 2 RECEIVE D THEIR D IPLOM A S A T A M A Y 7 GR ad U A TION fall and to be completed in spring of CEREMONY A T THE Q A T A R N A TION A L C ONVENTION C ENTRE . W ITH 6 1 MEMBERS , THIS YE A R ’ S CL A SS W A S THE L A RGEST TO 2015, the 100,000-square-foot, GR ad U A TE FROM THE D OH A C A MPUS .
    [Show full text]
  • UNESCO – United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization News (Bi-Monthly); United Nations Task Trative Apparatus of Its Own
    UNESCO – United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization News (bi-monthly); United Nations Task trative apparatus of its own. (The Com- Force on Environment and Human Settle- mittee worked as advisory organ from ments: Report to the Secretary-General, 1922 until 1946 when its role was taken 15 June 1998, New York 1998. over by UNESCO.) Internet: Homepage of UNEP: www. In 1925, France, responding to a re- unep.org; UNEP Industry and Environment quest by the Assembly of the → League Unit: www.unepie.org/; International Insti- of Nations, after the latter had been un- tute for Sustainable Development, Earth Ne- gotiations Bulletin (reports on the sessions able to secure funding to maintain a sig- of the Governing Council of UNEP and on nificant office in Geneva, created the In- other important UNEP meetings): www.iisd. ternational Institute for Intellectual Co- ca; further: www.ecologic-events.de/ieg-con operation, a legally independent institu- ference/en/index.htm; www.reformtheun.org/ tion with a secretariat of its own, fi- index.php/united_nations/c495?theme=alt 2. nanced by the French government. The International Committee of Intellectual Co-operation continued to exist as the UNESCO – United Nations Institute’s Board of Trustees. Educational, Scientific and Cultural From the beginning, conflicts sur- Organization rounded the creation of UNESCO: Should it be a governmental or a non- I. Introduction governmental organization? (→ NGOs) UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Should the Organization be concerned Scientific and Cultural Organization) solely with education and culture was founded on the initiative of the (“UNECO”) or should it encompass fur- Conference of Allied Ministers of Edu- ther areas, such as science and commu- cation, set up during World War II.
    [Show full text]
  • The Queens Ribbon
    The Queens Ribbon The proposed “Queens Ribbon” a bicycle-pedestrian bridge connecting Queens to Manhattan (rendering by T.Y. Lin International). A plan for three new car-free bridges to Manhattan’s Business District from Queens, Brooklyn, and New Jersey June 24, 2020 Table of Contents 1. Introduction 2. Background 3. The Need for Bicycle-Pedestrian Bridges 4. Three New Bridges – Alignment Options 5. Queens-Roosevelt Island-Midtown Manhattan Ribbon Bridge Case Study 6. Conclusion Appendices A. Worldwide Bicycle-Pedestrian Bridges B. Bicycling Growth in New York City C. Level of Service on East River Bridges D. Our Team 2 1. Introduction At the start of the Covid-19 crisis a group of transportation engineers began working together, on a pro bono basis, to develop a transportation system that would provide an almost risk-free method of travel to Manhattan’s Central Business District (CBD – Manhattan south of Central Park). The impetus for this grouping was the realization that the city may face similar epidemics, a severe flu season, or other man-made or natural disasters in the future. Experience told the group that the two forms of transportation that are most risk-free from both infections and crashes are walking and bicycling. These “active transportation” options are also healthy modes that burn calories, and build muscle, bone, heart, and lung strength while improving mental and emotional health. From this discussion, the idea of a bicycle-pedestrian bridge was born. Importantly, these facilities would be equitable. Costs to use them would be a pair of shoes or a bicycle. The group included teams from the Institute of Design & Each bridge could handle Construction (IDC) Innovation Hub of the NYU Tandon School approximately 20,000 people of Engineering, T.Y.
    [Show full text]
  • The League of Nations
    CFMUNESCO Cividale del Friuli Model United Nations UNESCO HISTORICAL COMMITTEE BOOKLET 2020 1920 – The League of Nations INDEX Part 1 - Work in the Historical Committee…………………………………………………..…page 3 Part 2 - Historical Background…………………………………………………………………page 6 Part 2.1 Historical Background - Aftermath of the world……………………………………...page 6 Part 2.2 Historical Background - Paris Peace Conference………………………………….…..page 9 Part 2.3 Historical Background - The League of Nations………………………………….….page 15 Part 2.4 Historical Background - First session of the League of Nations……………………..page 20 Part 3 - Chronology……………………………………………………………………………page 22 Part 4 - Nations and characters represented……………………………………………….…..page 23 Part 5 - Historical documents……………………………………………………….…………page 24 Sources……………………………………………………………………………….………..page 32 2 Historical Committee Booklet Part 1- Work in the Historical Committee A Historical Committee is a specialised committee that will be part of CFMUNESCO 2020. Its rules of procedure are slightly different from those of other MUN committees and so this Booklet is necessary to future delegates to understand them well. 1. How will the Historical committee work? A Historical Committee is a committee focused on historical events, which occurred in past times. For this reason, throughout the conference, delegates will have to pretend they are taking a step back into the past. The discussion will cover the period after the end of the Great War, from the Paris Peace Conference in 1919 until the approval of the Locarno Pact on the 1st December 1925. Delegates will discuss about real crises that endangered the stability of our world in the above mentioned period. The crises discussed occurred in different years and, during the debate, they will be discussed following their chronological order.
    [Show full text]
  • Yalta, a Tripartite Negotiation to Form the Post-War World Order: Planning for the Conference, the Big Three’S Strategies
    YALTA, A TRIPARTITE NEGOTIATION TO FORM THE POST-WAR WORLD ORDER: PLANNING FOR THE CONFERENCE, THE BIG THREE’S STRATEGIES Matthew M. Grossberg Submitted to the faculty of the University Graduate School in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in the Department of History, Indiana University August 2015 Accepted by the Graduate Faculty, Indiana University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts. Master’s Thesis Committee ______________________________ Kevin Cramer, Ph. D., Chair ______________________________ Michael Snodgrass, Ph. D. ______________________________ Monroe Little, Ph. D. ii ©2015 Matthew M. Grossberg iii Acknowledgements This work would not have been possible without the participation and assistance of so many of the History Department at Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis. Their contributions are greatly appreciated and sincerely acknowledged. However, I would like to express my deepest appreciation to the following: Dr. Anita Morgan, Dr. Nancy Robertson, and Dr. Eric Lindseth who rekindled my love of history and provided me the push I needed to embark on this project. Dr. Elizabeth Monroe and Dr. Robert Barrows for being confidants I could always turn to when this project became overwhelming. Special recognition goes to my committee Dr. Monroe Little and Dr. Michael Snodgrass. Both men provided me assistance upon and beyond the call of duty. Dr. Snodgrass patiently worked with me throughout my time at IUPUI, helping my writing progress immensely. Dr. Little came in at the last minute, saving me from a fate worse than death, another six months of grad school. Most importantly, all credit is due Dr.
    [Show full text]