DOCSLIB.ORG

Minorities in Lithuania

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

[Communicated to the Members of the Council.] C. 149.1 9 2 5 . 1. Geneva, March gth, 1925. LEAGUE OF NATIONS MINORITIES IN LITHUANIA Situation of the Polish Minority in Lithuania (See Council Document C. 31. 1925. I.) Note by the Secretary-General. In a letter dated March 6th, 1925, the Lithuanian Government communicated to the Secre tary-General some further observations regarding the situation of the Polish minority in Lithuania The Secretary-General has the honour to communicate herewith to the Members of the Council for their information the above-mentioned letter and observations. LETTER ADDRESSED TO THE SECRETARY-GENERAL BY THE LITHUANIAN DELEGATE TO THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS. Geneva, March 6th, 1925. I have the honour to forward to you the enclosed memorandum concerning the situation of the Polish minority in Lithuania, with the request that you will communicate it to the Members of the Council. Annexes I to IV will follow this document as soon as possible. (Signed) V. S idzikauskas , Lithuanian Delegate to the League oj Nations. Lithuanian Minister at Berlin. MEMORANDUM CONCERNING THE SITUATION OF THE POLISH MINORITY IN LITHUANIA submitted to the Council of the League oj Nations by the Lithuanian Government. The so-called Committee of Exiled Poles in Lithuania, whose headquarters are at Vilna, has addressed several petitions to the Council of the League of Nations accusing Lithuania of not observing the provisions of the Minorities Declaration of May 12th, 1922, and of persecuting the Polish minority in Lithuania. The Lithuanian Government, in its note of May 28th, 1924, addressed to M. Erik Colban, Chief ol the Minorities Section, and in a letter submitted to Sir Eric Drummond, the Secretary-General of the League, dated November 4th of the same year, had the honour to communicate to the Council of the League all its observations regarding the complaints by the so-called Committee of Exiles. The Council Committee of the League of Nations constituted in conformity with the Council resolution of October 25th, 1920, and consisting of M. Benes, M. Quinones de Léon and Mr. Chamberlain, at its meeting on December n th , 1924, at Rome, expressed the wish to receive from the Lithuanian Government supplementary explanations as regards the following points : 1. The assertion of the petitioners that Polish publications are hardly ever permitted by the authorities (pages 8 et seq. of the petition of June 1st, 1924. and letter of the petitioners dated August 12th, 1924, with annexes). 2. The assertion of the petitioners (page 10 of the Memorandum dated June 1st, 1924) that insurmountable obstacles are placed in the way of Polish private teaching in Lithuania. 3. Agrarian Reform. — In order to appreciate the importance of the complaints of the peti­ tioners on this matter, it would seem desirable that the Lithuanian Government should place at the disposal of the Council statistics showing how agrarian reform has been put into practice. S. d. N. 10J. (A) 3/25. Imp. Kundig The Lithuanian Government may perhaps also desire to furnish the Council with statistics concern­ ing expropriation without compensation carried out in the course of agrarian reform, indicating at the same time the legislative provisions in virtue of which this expropriation was effected. In order to facilitate an exchange of views with the Lithuanian Government on these questions the Council Committee thought it expedient that the question of the situation of the Polish Mino­ rity in Lithuania should be placed upon the agenda of the next session of the Council. The Government of the Lithuanian Republic makes the strictest reservations as to the procedure adopted by the Council Committee in pursuance of the petitions from the so-called Committee of Exiled Poles. These reservations are particularly necessary because : (i) the so-called Committee of Exiled Poles at Vilna, without presenting or possessing any authorisation to speak in the name of the whole Polish minority in Lithuania, poses as the spokesman and defender of the interests of all the Poles in this country ; and (2) the members of the so-called Committee of Poles have never been exiled by the Lithuanian Government from the territory under its administration: they belong to circles which, after having taken part in mischievous plots against the safety and the very existence of the Lithuanian State, established their headquarters on the other side of the line of demarcation between the Lithuanian and Polish troops which was traced immediately after General Zeligowski’s coup de force. Furthermore, the president of this Committee, M. Lopacinski, has never lived in territory forming part of the reconstituted State of Lithuania, but is a native of the province of Vitebsk, which is at present subject to Soviet Russia. As a matter of fact, the persons composing this Committee of Exiles are merely willing tools in the hands of Poland in the pursuit of her anti-Lithunania policy. Their role consists in representing the situation of the Polish minority in this country in the darkest colours and in thus diverting the attention of the League of Nations and of public opinion throughout the world from the intolerable state of affairs created by the Polish occupation of the Vilna area. At the same time, the Lithuanian Government, not wishing for the moment to emphasise too strongly this aspect of the question, but desiring to throw all possible light upon the present situation of the Polish minority in Lithuania, ventures to submit to the Council certain facts which it is essential to take into account before any accurate view of the complaints received from the so-called Committee of Exiled Poles at Vilna can be formed. The Lithuanian Government desires also to observe that, in its opinion, Lithuanian policy, as regards the use of languages, public education and agrarian reform, can only concern the Council of the League of Nations in so far as this policy is proved by facts to be in flagrant contradiction with international undertakings given by Lithuania. I A s s e r t io n o f t h e P e t i t i o n e r s t h a t P o l is h P ublications a r e h a r d l y e v e r p e r m it t e d b y t h e A u t h o r it ie s (pages 8 et seq. of the Petition of June 1st, 1924, and letter of the petitioners dated August 12th, 1924, with annexes). The question of languages was settled in Lithuania by the Constitution itself, paragraph 6 of which is as follows : “The official language shall be Lithuanian”. The use of local languages is regulated by the law. It has not so far been possible to apply this law, as well as a number of other laws also provided for in the Constitution, owing to the comparatively short time that has elapsed since the Constitution was voted, and owing to the necessity imposed upon the Lithuanian Government and legislative body of devoting themselves almost exclusively to laying the juri­ dical, economic and financial foundations of the State. Nevertheless, the Lithuanian Government is doing its utmost to submit to Parliament at as early a date as possible a bill to give effect to the above-mentioned provision in the Constitution. The Lithuanian Government can here and now declare that the law in question will be in complete harmony with paragraphs 3 and 4 of Article 4 of the Minorities Declaration dated May 12th, 1922, which stipulate that: “No restriction will be imposed on the free use by any Lithuanian national of any language in private intercourse, in commerce, in religion, in the press or in publications of any kind, or at public meetings. “Notwithstanding any establishment of an official language, adequate facilities will be given to Lithuanian nationals of non-Lithuanian speech for the use of their languages, either orally or in writing, before the Courts.” The Lithuanian Government can also state that there is in Lithuania to-day no law or regu­ lation in contradiction with the provisions of the said declaration. The truth of this statsment will be evident from the analysis we are proposing to make, point by point, of the charges brought against the Lithuanian Government by the so-called Committee of Exiled Poles at Vilna. Polish Press. The petitioners complain that, contrary to the provisions of Article 4, paragraph 3, of the declaration dated May 12th, 1922, the Lithuanian authorities have five times suspended the only Polish newspaper in Lithuania. This assertion calls for the following observations: (1) The newspaper Dziennik Kowienski, mentioned in the Committee’s petition, is not the only Polish newspaper in Lithuania. The Polish minority, despite its numerical weakness, has four newspapers appearing in Polish : the Chata Rodzinna, the Dzien Kowienski, the Nowiny and the Wiadomosci Rolnicze. The Lithuanian Government considers that this alone is proof of the tolerance shown towards the Polish minority ; and at a time, too, when Lithuanian newspapers in Lithuanian districts under Polish occupation are persecuted in a manner unparalleled in any civilised country, simply because they appear in Lithuanian. (2) The petitioners have omitted to mention in their appeal that the Dzien Kowienski has several times been punished, not because of the language in which it appears nor because it is a minority organ but by reason of breaches of the general press regulations. Owing to the extremely difficult circumstances in which the reconstitution of Lithuania as a State took place, and in view also of the geographical position of the country, the Lithuanian Government has been compelled to keep an exceedingly watchful eye upon subversive elements which have frequently tried to use the principle of the freedom of the press as a cover under which to conduct campaigns dangerous to the peace and very existence of the State.
Recommended publications
  • Crager on Burkman, 'Japan and the League of Nations: Empire and World Order, 1914-1938'

    Crager on Burkman, 'Japan and the League of Nations: Empire and World Order, 1914-1938'

    H-US-Japan Crager on Burkman, 'Japan and the League of Nations: Empire and World Order, 1914-1938' Review published on Wednesday, March 11, 2009 Thomas W. Burkman. Japan and the League of Nations: Empire and World Order, 1914-1938. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2008. xv + 289 pp. $58.00 (cloth), ISBN 978-0-8248-2982-7. Reviewed by Kelly E. Crager (Texas Tech University)Published on H-US-Japan (March, 2009) Commissioned by Yone Sugita Japanese Interwar Diplomacy In Japan and the League of Nations, Thomas W. Burkman recounts the history of Japan's foreign affairs from the close of World War I through the beginning of the Second Sino-Japanese War. Traditional understanding of Japan's role in the world during this era has been grossly simplified, according to the author, and a new and more balanced treatment of this topic was necessary to help bring about a fuller understanding of the developments in East Asia and the Pacific region prior to the Second World War. Although generally considered to have been an aggressive world power that largely eschewed international involvement to pursue its national interests, the empire, as Burkman insists, was very much committed to the promotion of ideals espoused by Woodrow Wilson and embodied in the League of Nations. Even though the Japanese readily embraced internationalist ideas, and participated fully, Japanese internationalism was influenced by peculiarly Japanese ideas concerning power and place. The author believes that when Wilsonian internationalism began to wane and when the economic pressures of the global depression began to set in, Japanese policymakers sought to protect national interests in the region rather than holding fast to internationalist policies that would make the empire vulnerable to foreign powers.
  • In Search of the Law Governed State

    In Search of the Law Governed State

    THE NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR SOVIET AND EAST EUROPEAN RESEARCH TITLE: IN SEARCH OF THE LAW-GOVERNED STAT E Conference Paper #17 of 1 7 Commentary : The Printed versions of Conference Remarks by Participant s AUTHOR: Berman et al . CONTRACTOR: Lehigh University PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR : Donald D. Barry COUNCIL CONTRACT NUMBER : 805-0 1 DATE : October 199 1 The work leading to this report was supported by funds provided by the National Council for Soviet and East European Research. The analysis and interpretations contained in the report are those of the author. NCSEER NOTE This paper is #17 in the series listed on the following page. The series is the product of a major conferenc e entitled, In Search of the Law-Governed State: Political and Societal Reform Under Gorbachev, which was summarized in a Council Report by that title authored by Donald D . Barry, and distributed by the Council i n October, 1991. The remaining papers were distributed seriatim . This paper was written prior to the attempted coup of August 19, 1991 . The Conference Papers 1. GIANMARIA AJANI, "The Rise and Fall of the Law-Governed Stat e in the Experience of Russian Legal Scholarship . " 2. EUGENE HUSKEY , "From Legal Nihilism to Pravovoe Gosudarstvo : Soviet Legal Development, 1917-1990 . " 3. LOUISE SHELLEY, "Legal Consciousness and the Pravovoe Gosudarstvo . " 4. DIETRICH ANDRE LOEBER, "Regional and National Variations : The Baltic Factor . " 5. JOHN HAZARD, "The Evolution of the Soviet Constitution . " 6. FRANCES FOSTER-SIMONS, "The Soviet Legislature : Gorbachev' s School of Democracy . " 7. GER VAN DEN BERG, "Executive Power and the Concept of Pravovo e Gosudarstvo .
  • UNESCO – United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization News (Bi-Monthly); United Nations Task Trative Apparatus of Its Own

    UNESCO – United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization News (Bi-Monthly); United Nations Task Trative Apparatus of Its Own

    UNESCO – United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization News (bi-monthly); United Nations Task trative apparatus of its own. (The Com- Force on Environment and Human Settle- mittee worked as advisory organ from ments: Report to the Secretary-General, 1922 until 1946 when its role was taken 15 June 1998, New York 1998. over by UNESCO.) Internet: Homepage of UNEP: www. In 1925, France, responding to a re- unep.org; UNEP Industry and Environment quest by the Assembly of the → League Unit: www.unepie.org/; International Insti- of Nations, after the latter had been un- tute for Sustainable Development, Earth Ne- gotiations Bulletin (reports on the sessions able to secure funding to maintain a sig- of the Governing Council of UNEP and on nificant office in Geneva, created the In- other important UNEP meetings): www.iisd. ternational Institute for Intellectual Co- ca; further: www.ecologic-events.de/ieg-con operation, a legally independent institu- ference/en/index.htm; www.reformtheun.org/ tion with a secretariat of its own, fi- index.php/united_nations/c495?theme=alt 2. nanced by the French government. The International Committee of Intellectual Co-operation continued to exist as the UNESCO – United Nations Institute’s Board of Trustees. Educational, Scientific and Cultural From the beginning, conflicts sur- Organization rounded the creation of UNESCO: Should it be a governmental or a non- I. Introduction governmental organization? (→ NGOs) UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Should the Organization be concerned Scientific and Cultural Organization) solely with education and culture was founded on the initiative of the (“UNECO”) or should it encompass fur- Conference of Allied Ministers of Edu- ther areas, such as science and commu- cation, set up during World War II.
  • UNITED NATIONS CEDAW Convention on the Elimination of All

    UNITED NATIONS CEDAW Convention on the Elimination of All

    CEDAW/C/LTU/1 English Page 1 CEDAW UNITED NATIONS Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women COMMITTEE ON THE ELIMINATION OF DISCRIMINATION AGAINST WOMEN (CEDAW) CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES UNDER ARTICLE 18 OF THE CONVENTION ON THE ELIMINATION OF ALL FORMS OF DISCRIMINATION AGAINST WOMEN Initial report of States parties LITHUANIA Part I Land and people1 Lithuania is located on the eastern coast of the Baltic Sea. It borders Latvia to the north, Belarus to the east, and Poland and the Kaliningrad region of the Russian Federation to the south. Lithuania covers an area of 65,300 square kilometres. At the beginning of 1998 the population totalled 3,704 million. The capital of Lithuania is Vilnius. Average income per capita: in the first quarter of 1998, it was 452 litas (LT), and average disposable income per capita was LT 393.7. GDP: in 1996, LT 31,569 million; and in 1997, LT 38,201 million. /... CEDAW/C/LTU/1 English Page 2 Rate of inflation has been decreasing in recent years: in 1994, it was 45.1 per cent, and in 1997, 8.4 per cent. External debt: as of 1 July 1998, it comprised US$ 1,402.70 million. Rate of unemployment: in 1997, 5.9 per cent; in April 1998, 6.9 per cent. Literacy rate: according to the census of 1989, 99.8 per cent of the population 9-49 years of age were literate. Religion: the majority of the population is Roman Catholic. Ethnic composition of the population: according to the data of the beginning of 1997, Lithuanians comprised 81.6 per cent; Russians, 8.2; Poles, 6.9; Belarussians, 1.5; Ukrainians, 1.0; Jews, 0.1; and other nationalities, 0.7 per cent.
  • The League of Nations

    The League of Nations

    CFMUNESCO Cividale del Friuli Model United Nations UNESCO HISTORICAL COMMITTEE BOOKLET 2020 1920 – The League of Nations INDEX Part 1 - Work in the Historical Committee…………………………………………………..…page 3 Part 2 - Historical Background…………………………………………………………………page 6 Part 2.1 Historical Background - Aftermath of the world……………………………………...page 6 Part 2.2 Historical Background - Paris Peace Conference………………………………….…..page 9 Part 2.3 Historical Background - The League of Nations………………………………….….page 15 Part 2.4 Historical Background - First session of the League of Nations……………………..page 20 Part 3 - Chronology……………………………………………………………………………page 22 Part 4 - Nations and characters represented……………………………………………….…..page 23 Part 5 - Historical documents……………………………………………………….…………page 24 Sources……………………………………………………………………………….………..page 32 2 Historical Committee Booklet Part 1- Work in the Historical Committee A Historical Committee is a specialised committee that will be part of CFMUNESCO 2020. Its rules of procedure are slightly different from those of other MUN committees and so this Booklet is necessary to future delegates to understand them well. 1. How will the Historical committee work? A Historical Committee is a committee focused on historical events, which occurred in past times. For this reason, throughout the conference, delegates will have to pretend they are taking a step back into the past. The discussion will cover the period after the end of the Great War, from the Paris Peace Conference in 1919 until the approval of the Locarno Pact on the 1st December 1925. Delegates will discuss about real crises that endangered the stability of our world in the above mentioned period. The crises discussed occurred in different years and, during the debate, they will be discussed following their chronological order.
  • From Nuremberg to the Hague

    From Nuremberg to the Hague

    From Nuremberg to The Hague: Teaching from the Past - Challenges for the Future Background: Making War More “Civilized” Efforts to mitigate the impact of military conflicts extend well back into the 19th century. One turning point came with Henry Dunant’s experiences in Italy in 1859, when more than 30,000 dead and wounded were left untended or unburied after the battle of Solferino. Dunant did what he could to help the wounded and care for the dead on the battlefield, but his options were very limited. He then went on to advocate founding a neutral entity to care for the wounded – a desire that met with widespread support. The new organization, founded in 1863, would name itself the “International Committee of the Red Cross” (ICRC) in 1876. By August 1864, twelve countries had already adopted the first Geneva Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded in Armies in the Field (the “First Geneva Convention”). But the Red Cross and Geneva Convention focused “only” on such casualties as wounded soldiers and prisoners of war, not the way in which war itself was waged (ius in bello) or the right to wage war (ius ad bellum). Ten years later, at the Brussels Conference of August 1874, a group of countries entered into negotiations on the “Laws and Customs of War.” While the Brussels declaration failed to take effect for lack of adequate ratification, 25 years later the treaties based on it – the Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907 – brought a breakthrough. The Hague Conventions on Land Warfare prohibited certain means and methods of waging war, and can be viewed as an attempt to civilize the very process of waging war itself.
  • NUREMBERG) Judgment of 1 October 1946

    NUREMBERG) Judgment of 1 October 1946

    INTERNATIONAL MILITARY TRIBUNAL (NUREMBERG) Judgment of 1 October 1946 Page numbers in braces refer to IMT, judgment of 1 October 1946, in The Trial of German Major War Criminals. Proceedings of the International Military Tribunal sitting at Nuremberg, Germany , Part 22 (22nd August ,1946 to 1st October, 1946) 1 {iii} THE INTERNATIONAL MILITARY TRIBUNAL IN SESSOIN AT NUREMBERG, GERMANY Before: THE RT. HON. SIR GEOFFREY LAWRENCE (member for the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) President THE HON. SIR WILLIAM NORMAN BIRKETT (alternate member for the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) MR. FRANCIS BIDDLE (member for the United States of America) JUDGE JOHN J. PARKER (alternate member for the United States of America) M. LE PROFESSEUR DONNEDIEU DE VABRES (member for the French Republic) M. LE CONSEILER FLACO (alternate member for the French Republic) MAJOR-GENERAL I. T. NIKITCHENKO (member for the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics) LT.-COLONEL A. F. VOLCHKOV (alternate member for the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics) {iv} THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE FRENCH REPUBLIC, THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND, AND THE UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS Against: Hermann Wilhelm Göring, Rudolf Hess, Joachim von Ribbentrop, Robert Ley, Wilhelm Keitel, Ernst Kaltenbrunner, Alfred Rosenberg, Hans Frank, Wilhelm Frick, Julius Streicher, Walter Funk, Hjalmar Schacht, Gustav Krupp von Bohlen und Halbach, Karl Dönitz, Erich Raeder, Baldur von Schirach, Fritz Sauckel, Alfred Jodl, Martin
  • The Security Council and the Legitimacy of the Use of Force: Legal, Normative and Social Aspects

    The Security Council and the Legitimacy of the Use of Force: Legal, Normative and Social Aspects

    ICIP WORKING PAPERS: 2010/09 ICIP 2010/09 GRAN VIA DE LES CORTS CATALANES 658, BAIXOS 08010 BARCELONA (SPAIN) The Security Council and the T. +34 93 554 42 70 | F. +34 93 554 42 80 [email protected] | WWW.ICIP.CAT Legitimacy of the Use of Force: Legal, Normative and Social Aspects Matilde Pérez Herranz The Security Council and the Legitimacy of the Use of Force: Legal, Normative and Social Aspects The Security Council and the Legitimacy of Use Force: The Security Council and the Legitimacy of the Use of Force: Legal, Normative, and Social Aspects Matilde Pérez Herranz Institut Català Internacional per la Pau Barcelona, December 2010 Gran Via de les Corts Catalanes 658, baixos · 08010 Barcelona T. +34 93 554 42 70 | F. +34 93 554 42 80 [email protected] | http://www.icip.cat Editors Javier Alcalde and Rafael Grasa Editorial Board Pablo Aguiar, Alfons Barceló, Catherine Charrett, Gemma Collantes-Celador, Caterina Garcia, Abel Escribà, Vicenç Fisas, Tica Font, Antoni Pigrau, Xavier Pons, Alejandro Pozo, Mònica Sabata, Jaume Saura, Antoni Segura and Josep Maria Terricabras Text Correction Charles Southgate Graphic Design Fundació Tam-Tam ISSN 2013-5793 (edición en línea) 2013-5785 (edición en papel) DL B-38.039-2009 © 2010 Institut Català Internacional per la Pau All rights reserved THE AUTHOR Matilde Pérez Herranz is Lecturer in International Relations at the De- partment of International Law and International Relations at the Uni- versitat Pompeu Fabra. She graduated in Law and Political Science and Public Administration and she holds an MA in International Studies from the Universidad Autónoma of Madrid.
  • The Abyssinian War and the League of Nations: Debates in the Council

    The Abyssinian War and the League of Nations: Debates in the Council

    RJHIS 3 (2) 2016 The Abyssinian War and the League of Nations: Debates in the Council Vlad Moghioroși* Abstract: The study will analyze how the Council of the League of Nations acted as a forum for discussions during the Abyssinian war (1935-1936). Most studies focused on the war underline the powerless of the League and of its Council. Moreover, the Council’s role as a forum for discussions during the dispute is generally overlooked. However, the Council offered the parties involved or with interest in the conflict the opportunity to express their position and test the world opinion. The paper will study this issue by examining the minutes of the Council’s meetings, published in the League of Nations Official Journal. Other sources used are the Italian media, and memoires and journals of Italian, French and British representatives. Keywords: Ethiopia, Italy, League Council, Mussolini, France, Britain. Introduction A key event in understanding the collapse of the League of Nations’ collective security is the Italian conquest of Ethiopia (1935-1936). The war was part of a chain of events that questioned the League’s capacity to secure peace. Among them, the Manchurian crisis (1931-1932), the re- militarization of the Rhineland (1936), the Spanish Civil War (1936-1939), the partition of Czechoslovakia (1938-1939) and the Italian invasion of Albania (1939). The League proved that it was unable to protect one of its * Vlad Moghioroși is a MA student, with a specialization in the History of the Romanian West at the University of Oradea, Faculty of History, International Relations, Political Sciences and Communication Sciences.
  • COMPLETED NOTES WWII Introduction Part I: Long-Term Causes of WWII WHAT WAS IT? WHOSE IDEA WAS IT? GOAL? DID IT HAPPEN? DID IT

    COMPLETED NOTES WWII Introduction Part I: Long-Term Causes of WWII WHAT WAS IT? WHOSE IDEA WAS IT? GOAL? DID IT HAPPEN? DID IT

    COMPLETED NOTES WWII Introduction Part I: Long-Term Causes of WWII WHAT WAS WHOSE GOAL? DID IT DID IT IT? IDEA WAS HAPPEN? WORK? IT? LEAGUE OF Representatives President Prevent war Yes, Treaty No – US NATIONS from various Wilson – Fourteen of Versailles didn’t join countries met to Points discuss problems SELF- People in an area President Less conflict Yes, Map of It made some DETERMATION would get to Wilson – Fourteen because people will Europe people happy, decide on own Points be able to practice redrawn in but countries government their culture as Treaty of that lost land they want. Versailles unhappy. REPARATIONS Germany had to Allied Powers – Punish Germany, Yes, Treaty Put Germany pay $33 billion in Treaty of keep them from of Versailles in depression, damages for Versailles becoming a world low morale, WWI. power again looked for someone to help them. Based on our discussion so far, describe the long-term causes of WWII in 2-3 sentences. By punishing Germany with reparations, it left them in a situation in which they would look for a way to grow great again. They wanted to regain land and there was no real way to stop them since the League of Nations was so weak. Part II: Short-Term Cause of WWII Appeasement Giving in to some demands in order to avoid conflict. *Please Totalitarianism A system in which the government suppresses all opposition * Total Control and controls most aspects of peoples’ lives. Describe the situation in Germany after WWI. Why did Hitler come to power in Germany? - Depression, money worthless, low - Well spoken, promised Germans a great nation morale, thought Treaty of Versailles again.
  • 1935 Sanctions Against Italy: Would Coal and Crude Oil Have Made a Difference?

    1935 Sanctions Against Italy: Would Coal and Crude Oil Have Made a Difference?

    1935 SANCTIONS AGAINST ITALY: WOULD COAL AND CRUDE OIL HAVE MADE 1 A DIFFERENCE? CRISTIANO ANDREA RISTUCCIA LINACRE COLLEGE OXFORD OX1 3JA GREAT BRITAIN Telephone 44 1865 721981 [email protected] 1 Thanks to (in alphabetical order): Dr. Leonardo Becchetti, Sergio Cardarelli (and staff of the ASBI), Criana Connal, John Fawcett, Prof. Charles Feinstein, Dr. James Foreman-Peck, Paola Geretto (and staff of the ISTAT library and archive), Gwyneira Isaac, Clare Pettitt, Prof. Maria Teresa Salvemini, Prof. Giuseppe Tattara, Leigh Shaw-Taylor, Prof. Gianni Toniolo, Dr. Marco Trombetta, and two anonymous referees who made useful comments on a previous version of this paper. The responsibility for the contents of the article is, of course, mine alone. ABSTRACT This article assesses the hypothesis that in 1935 - 1936 the implementation of sanctions on the export of coal and oil products to Italy by the League of Nations would have forced Italy to abandon her imperialistic war against Ethiopia. In particular, the article focuses on the claim that Britain and France, the League’s leaders, could have halted the Italian invasion of Ethiopia by means of coal and oil sanctions, and without the help of the United States, or recourse to stronger means such as a military blockade. An analysis of the data on coal consumption in the industrial census of 1937 - 1938 shows that the Italian industry would have survived a League embargo on coal, provided that Germany continued her supply to Italy. The counterfactual proves that the effect of an oil embargo was entirely dependent on the attitude of the United States towards the League’s action.
  • The Implementation and Protection of the Principles of the Rule of Law in Georgia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Moldova, and Ukraine

    The Implementation and Protection of the Principles of the Rule of Law in Georgia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Moldova, and Ukraine

    THE IMPLEMENTATION AND PROTECTION OF THE PRINCIPLES OF THE RULE OF LAW IN GEORGIA, THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA, THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA, AND UKRAINE 2016 Published within the framework of the project “Assistance to the Constitutional Courts of Georgia, the Republic of Moldova, and Ukraine in Ensuring the Implementation and Protection of the Principles of the Rule of Law”. The project is financed under the Development Cooperation and Democracy Promotion Programme of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Lithuania. Edited by: Prof. Dr. Dainius Žalimas President of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania Dr. Ingrida Danėlienė Secretary General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania (Project leader) Dr. Ieva Saudargaitė Judicial assistant of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania (Coordinator of project activities) This publication is a compendium of reports from the International Conference of the Justices of the Constitutional Courts of Georgia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Moldova, and Ukraine (Vilnius Forum), held in Vilnius on 24–25 October 2016, and the relevant material – the doctrine of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania, the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Courts of Georgia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Moldova, and Ukraine, and certain reflections on the application of the principles of the rule of law following the analysis of questionnaire responses carried out by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania. ISBN 978-9955-688-28-0 © The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania, 2016 CONTENTS Foreword by President of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania Dainius Žalimas ..........................................................................