DOCSLIB.ORG

KENNEDY SPACE CENTER – APOLLO to MULTI-USER SPACEPORT Philip J

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
KENNEDY SPACE CENTER – APOLLO to MULTI-USER SPACEPORT Philip J THE 2ND GROUND-BASED SPACE FACILITIES SYMPOSIUM 17-19 October 2017, Toulouse, France KENNEDY SPACE CENTER – APOLLO TO MULTI-USER SPACEPORT Philip J. Weber (1), Howard S. Kanner, PhD, CSEP (2) (1) National Aeronautics and Space Administration MS LX, Kennedy Space Center, FL, 32899, USA, [email protected] (2) All Points Logistics, LLC MS LX-C-LCC, Kennedy Space Center, FL, 32899, USA, [email protected] ABSTRACT NASA Kennedy Space Center (KSC) was established as the gateway to exploring beyond earth. Since the establishment of KSC in December 1963, the Center has been critical in the execution of the United States of America’s bold mission to send astronauts beyond the grasp of the terra firma. On May 25, 1961, a few weeks after a Soviet cosmonaut became the first person to fly in space, President John F. Kennedy laid out the ambitious goal “of landing a man on the moon and returning him safely to the Earth” by the end of the decade. The resultant Apollo program was massive endeavor, driven by the Cold War Space Race, and supported with a robust budget. The Apollo program consisted of 18 launches from newly developed infrastructure, including 12 manned missions and six lunar landings, ending with Apollo 17 that launched on December 7, 1972. Continuing to use this infrastructure, the Skylab program launched four missions. During the Skylab program, KSC infrastructure was redesigned to meet the needs of the Space Shuttle program, which launched its first vehicle (STS-1) on April 12, 1981. The Space Shuttle required significant modifications to the Apollo launch pads and assembly facilities, as well as new infrastructure, such as Orbiter and Payload Processing Facilities, as well as the Shuttle Landing Facility. The Space Shuttle was a workhorse that supported many satellite deployments, but was key for the construction and maintenance of the International Space Station, which required additional facilities at KSC to support processing of the flight hardware. After reaching the new Millennium, United States policymakers searched for new ways to reduce the cost of space exploration. The Constellation Program was initiated in 2005 with a goal of providing a crewed lunar landing with a much smaller budget. The very successful Space Shuttle made its last launch on July 8, 2011, after 135 missions. In the subsequent years, KSC continues to evolve, and this paper will address past and future efforts of the transformation of the KSC Apollo and Space Shuttle heritage infrastructure into a more versatile, multi-user spaceport. The paper will also discuss the US Congressional and NASA initiatives for developing and supporting multiple commercial partners, while simultaneously supporting NASA’s human exploration initiative, consisting of Space Launch System (SLS), Orion spacecraft and associated ground launch systems. In addition, the paper explains the approach with examples for NASA KSC to leverage new technologies and innovative capabilities developed to reduce the cost to individual users. 1. INTRODUCTION NASA Kennedy Space Center (KSC) was established as the gateway to exploring beyond earth. Since the establishment of KSC in December 1963, the Center has been critical in the execution of the United States of America’s bold mission to send astronauts beyond the grasp of the terra firma. On May 25, 1961, a few weeks after a Soviet cosmonaut became the first person to fly in space, President John F. Kennedy laid out the ambitious goal “of landing a man on the moon and returning him safely to the Earth” by the end of the decade. The resultant Apollo program was massive endeavor, driven by the Cold War Space Race, and supported with a robust budget. The Apollo program consisted of 18 launches from newly developed infrastructure, including 12 manned 1 GBSF 2017 missions and six lunar landings, ending with Apollo 17 that launched on December 7, 1972. Continuing to use this infrastructure, the Skylab program launched four missions. During the Skylab program, KSC infrastructure was redesigned to meet the needs of the Space Shuttle program, which launched its first vehicle (STS-1) on April 12, 1981. The Space Shuttle required significant modifications to the Apollo launch pads and assembly facilities, as well as new infrastructure, such as Orbiter and Payload Processing Facilities, as well as the Shuttle Landing Facility. The Space Shuttle was a workhorse that supported many satellite deployments, but was key for the construction and maintenance of the International Space Station, which required additional facilities at KSC to support processing of the flight hardware. After reaching the new Millennium, United States policymakers searched for new ways to reduce the cost of space exploration. The Constellation Program was initiated in 2005 with a goal of providing a crewed lunar landing with a much smaller budget. The very successful Space Shuttle made its last launch on July 8, 2011, after 135 missions. 2. KSC MASTER PLAN 2012-2032 [1] In 2012, Robert Cabana, the NASA Kennedy Space Center Director, rolled out a 20-year vision for the evolution of KSC in the post-Space Shuttle age, where NASA would continue reaching for the stars, while nurturing nascent commercial space-faring ventures. The KSC Master Plan outlined the philosophy as well as the road map for becoming a multi-user spaceport. The Master Plan’s central focus remains in support of NASA achieving its programmatic mission objectives but additionally it is also designed to maximize the provision of excess capabilities and assets in support of non-NASA access to space. This transformation to a multiuser spaceport will allow NASA to subsidize costs of expensive infrastructure and facilities and still maintain the country’s ability to push the boundaries of our understanding of the universe. To execute such an effort, the document outlined how to transform KSC, from focusing primarily on NASA programs (and collaborations) such as the Space Shuttle and International Space Station, to become a multi-user spaceport, working with commercial industry to be able to collaborate use of common needs, and to efficiently utilize resources, both highly trained people and space- mission-specific facilities, for which the Space Coast of Florida has been so aptly named. Since NASA established a presence on the east coast of Florida, adjacent to Cape Canaveral Air Force Station (CCAFS), it has been managing the launches of NASA’s manned space flight missions, such as Project Mercury, Project Gemini, Apollo, Skylab and the Space Shuttle, as well as robotic missions. The KSC Master Plan details what KSC capabilities and resources exist (Core Competencies), followed by the plan to transition to multi-user access. KSC Core Competencies Building upon over 50 years of experience, the 2012 Master Plan methodically attacks the challenge of thoroughly defining its’ path for a successful transition to being a multi-user spaceport. To lay the necessary groundwork, KSC outlined the launch support capabilities, which includes matching payloads with appropriate launch vehicles, supporting development activities, processing launch vehicles, spacecraft and payloads, performing operations such as launch, landing and recovery, and providing program sustainment support. In addition, KSC has significant experience with the design, development, operation, and sustainment of flight systems, ground systems, and supporting infrastructure, and the activities necessary to bring advanced flight systems and transformational technologies to advance exploration and space systems to operational levels. Planning Strategy The vision for the KSC transformation is to become an economically sustainable multi-user spaceport. To achieve this vision, the Plan’s Core Strategies integrate NASA capabilities and 2 GBSF 2017 resources with emerging non-NASA opportunities, and utilizes development factors, future land use, and right-sizing initiatives to support the success of NASA missions, and the growth and success of non-NASA space initiatives. Development Factors The development approach seeks to balance the operational needs of a spaceport with the protection of the Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge and the Canaveral National Seashore, working closely with the United States Fish & Wildlife Service and the National Park Service, respectively. Currently, about 5% of the 141,829 acre land area is used to support operations. Preserving critical wildlife habitats and wetlands, as well as excluding areas at risk from sea level rise, opens up another 5% of area suitable for development and use for spaceport needs (Fig. 1). With a lot of the very low-lying land, new development needs to avoid regions identified as being within a 500-year flood plain, or the land and facilities need to be hardened to withstand a 500-year flood event. Fig. 1: KSC Development Suitability and Future Land Use Maps Future Land Use The Planning Strategy further clarifies the development factors to expand upon KSC’s current capabilities and infrastructure to promote clustering of facilities such that compatible capabilities are grouped together, while hazardous and non-hazardous operations will be appropriately separated. Such a clustering plan will encourage synergy among users, improve the efficiency of spaceport operations, provide safety for the workforce, improve security considerations for all operations and hardware, and maximize the preservation of critical habitats. Asset Strategy To best execute the development of the infrastructure and launch operation facilities will require a different approach to allocation and management of the spaceport assets. The transition to a multi- user spaceport will require a reduction of aging NASA-funded facilities and infrastructure, reducing the NASA operational footprint to be optimally sized to accomplish NASA program objectives while supporting the growth and relative independence of non-NASA operations. Future NASA assets will need to be evolvable to meet the needs of the current missions, as well as be able to 3 GBSF 2017 evolve to support future missions. To do so, development will need to minimize unique program- specific capabilities.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NASA's Lunar Orbital Platform-Gatway
    The Space Congress® Proceedings 2018 (45th) The Next Great Steps Feb 28th, 9:00 AM NASA's Lunar Orbital Platform-Gatway Tracy Gill NASA/KSC Technology Strategy Manager Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-proceedings Scholarly Commons Citation Gill, Tracy, "NASA's Lunar Orbital Platform-Gatway" (2018). The Space Congress® Proceedings. 17. https://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-proceedings/proceedings-2018-45th/presentations/17 This Event is brought to you for free and open access by the Conferences at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Space Congress® Proceedings by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA’s Lunar Orbital Platform- Gateway Tracy Gill NASA/Kennedy Space Center Exploration Research & Technology Programs February 28, 2018 45th Space Congress Space Policy Directive-1 “Lead an innovative and sustainable program of exploration with commercial and international partners to enable human expansion across the solar system and to bring back to Earth new knowledge and opportunities. Beginning with missions beyond low-Earth orbit, the United States will lead the return of humans to the Moon for long-term exploration and utilization, followed by human missions to Mars and other destinations.” 2 LUNAR EXPLORATION CAMPAIGN 3 4 STRATEGIC PRINCIPLES FOR SUSTAINABLE EXPLORATION • FISCAL REALISM • ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY Implementable in the near-term with the buying
    [Show full text]
  • The Orion Spacecraft As a Key Element in a Deep Space Gateway
    The Orion Spacecraft as a Key Element in a Deep Space Gateway A Technical Paper Presented by: Timothy Cichan Lockheed Martin Space [email protected] Kerry Timmons Lockheed Martin Space [email protected] Kathleen Coderre Lockheed Martin Space [email protected] Willian D. Pratt Lockheed Martin Space [email protected] July 2017 © 2014 Lockheed Martin Corporation Abstract With the Orion exploration vehicle and Space Launch System (SLS) approaching operational status, NASA and the international community are developing the next generation of habitats to serve as a deep space platform that will be the first of its kind, a cislunar Deep Space Gateway (DSG). The DSG is evolvable, flexible, and modular. It would be positioned in the vicinity of the Moon and allow astronauts to demonstrate they can operate for months at a time well beyond Low Earth Orbit. Orion is the next generation human exploration spacecraft being developed by NASA. It is designed to perform deep space exploration missions, and is capable of carrying a crew of 4 astronauts on independent free-flight missions up to 21 days, limited only by consumables. Because Orion meets the strict requirements for deep space flight environments (reentry conditions, deep-space communications, safety, radiation, and life support for example) it is a key element in a DSG and is more than just a transportation system. Orion has the capability to act as the command deck of any deep space piloted vehicle. To increase affordability and reduce the complexity and number of subsystem functions the early DSG must be responsible for, the DSG can leverage these unique deep space qualifications of Orion.
    [Show full text]
  • Nextstep Habitation
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA’s Lunar Orbital Platform- Gateway Tracy Gill NASA/Kennedy Space Center Exploration Research & Technology Programs February 28, 2018 45th Space Congress Space Policy Directive-1 “Lead an innovative and sustainable program of exploration with commercial and international partners to enable human expansion across the solar system and to bring back to Earth new knowledge and opportunities. Beginning with missions beyond low-Earth orbit, the United States will lead the return of humans to the Moon for long-term exploration and utilization, followed by human missions to Mars and other destinations.” 2 LUNAR EXPLORATION CAMPAIGN 3 4 STRATEGIC PRINCIPLES FOR SUSTAINABLE EXPLORATION • FISCAL REALISM • ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY Implementable in the near-term with the buying power Opportunities for U.S. commercial business to further of current budgets and in the longer term with budgets enhance their experience and business base; commensurate with economic growth; • ARCHITECTURE OPENNESS AND RESILIENCE • SCIENTIFIC EXPLORATION Resilient architecture featuring multi-use, evolvable space Exploration enables science and science enables infrastructure, minimizing unique developments, with each exploration; leveraging scientific expertise for human mission leaving something behind to support subsequent exploration of the solar system. missions; • TECHNOLOGY PULL AND PUSH • GLOBAL COLLABORATION AND LEADERSHIP Application of high TRL technologies for near term Substantial new international and commercial missions,
    [Show full text]
  • Deep Space Gateway - Enabling Missions to Mars
    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20180000122 2019-08-30T13:29:25+00:00Z National Aeronautics and Space Administration Deep Space Gateway - Enabling Missions to Mars Mars Study Capability Team – Michelle Rucker, John Connolly Introduction • The Global Exploration Roadmap reflects that human missions to Mars remain the consensus horizon goal of participating agencies – Sustainable human missions, including missions to the lunar surface, will be enabled by international cooperation • NASA analyses and planning for Mars missions have informed Global Exploration Roadmap timing and content 2 Deep Space Gateway & Transport Extensibility to Mars • There are many opportunities for commonality between Lunar vicinity and Mars mission hardware and operations – Best approach: • Identify Mars mission risks that can be bought down with testing in the Lunar vicinity • Then explore hardware and operational concepts that work for both missions with minimal compromise • Deep Space Transport will validate the systems and capabilities required to send humans to Mars orbit and return to Earth – Deep Space Gateway provides a convenient assembly, checkout, and refurbishment location to enable Mars missions • Current deep space transport concept is to fly missions of increasing complexity – Shakedown cruise, Mars orbital mission, Mars surface mission • Mars surface mission would require additional elements 3 Deep Space Gateway (DSG) Concept Phase 2: Deep Space Transport PHASE 2 Deep Space Gateway 180-Day DST Checkout and 1-Year Shakedown Cruise 4 Shakedown
    [Show full text]
  • Subcommittee on Space and Aeronautics Committee on Science, Space, and Technology U.S
    SUBCOMMITTEE ON SPACE AND AERONAUTICS COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE, SPACE, AND TECHNOLOGY U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES HEARING CHARTER Keeping Our Sights on Mars: A Review of NASA’s Deep Space Exploration Programs and Lunar Proposal Wednesday, May 8, 2019 2:00 p.m. 2318 Rayburn House Office Building PURPOSE The purpose of the hearing is to review the National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s (NASA’s) deep space human exploration programs, including proposed lunar activities and the budgetary resource requirements for those activities, in the context of the long-term goal of sending humans to the surface of Mars. WITNESSES Mr. William H. Gerstenmaier, Associate Administrator, Human Exploration and Operations, National Aeronautics and Space Administration Mr. Mark Sirangelo, Special Assistant to the Administrator, National Aeronautics and Space Administration Dr. Jonathan Lunine, Director, Cornell Center for Astrophysics and Planetary Science, Co-Chair of the Former Committee on Human Spaceflight, National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine Dr. Patricia Sanders, Chair, Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel Mr. J. Walter Faulconer, President, Faulconer Consulting Group OVERARCHING QUESTIONS What are the goals, objectives, plans, and budgetary requirements for the Administration’s proposal to send humans to the lunar surface in 2024 and to sustain a long-term presence there? To what extent do the Administration’s proposed lunar plans contribute directly to buying-down the technical and overall risks involved in a human mission to Mars? What are the safety, technical, and programmatic risks associated with the lunar proposal? 1 BACKGROUND The NASA deep space human exploration program and activities include the heavy-lift Space Launch System (SLS), the Orion crew vehicle, Exploration Ground Systems (EGS), and Exploration Research and Development.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA's Management of the Orion Multi-Purpose Crew
    NASA Office of Inspector General National Aeronautics and Space Administration Office of Audits NASA’S MANAGEMENT OF THE ORION MULTI-PURPOSE CREW VEHICLE PROGRAM July 16, 2020 Report No. IG-20-018 Office of Inspector General To report, fraud, waste, abuse, or mismanagement, contact the NASA OIG Hotline at 800-424-9183 or 800-535-8134 (TDD) or visit https://oig.nasa.gov/hotline.html. You can also write to NASA Inspector General, P.O. Box 23089, L’Enfant Plaza Station, Washington, D.C. 20026. The identity of each writer and caller can be kept confidential, upon request, to the extent permitted by law. To suggest ideas for or to request future audits contact the Assistant Inspector General for Audits at https://oig.nasa.gov/aboutAll.html. RESULTS IN BRIEF NASA’s Management of the Orion Multi‐Purpose Crew Vehicle Program NASA Office of Inspector General Office of Audits July 16, 2020 IG‐20‐018 (A‐19‐012‐00) WHY WE PERFORMED THIS AUDIT Since 2006, NASA has been developing the Orion Multi‐Purpose Crew Vehicle (Orion) to transport astronauts beyond low Earth orbit. With the announcement of the Artemis Program in May 2019, NASA set the ambitious goal of using Orion to return humans to the Moon by 2024. As of July 2020 Orion has flown three test flights but none with astronauts on board. The Orion Program is one‐third of NASA’s Exploration System Development Division, which is also overseeing development of a heavy‐lift rocket known as the Space Launch System (SLS) and a ground and launch support program known as Exploration Ground Systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Enabling Deep Space Exploration with an In-Space Propellant Depot Supplied from Lunar Ice
    AIAA SPACE Forum 10.2514/6.2017-5376 12 - 14 Sep 2017, Orlando, FL AIAA SPACE and Astronautics Forum and Exposition Enabling Deep Space Exploration with an In-Space Propellant Depot Supplied from Lunar Ice Sophia Casanova1, Jack Henry de Frahan2, Vinicius Guimaraes Goecks3, Sumudu Herath4, Mercedes Herreras Martinez5, Nicholas Jamieson6, Therese Jones7, Sung Wha Kang8, Sydney Katz9, Gary Li10, Donal O’Sullivan11, Daniel Pastor12, Nathan Sharifrazi13, Bryan Sinkovec14, Joseph Sparta15, Matthew Vernacchia16 Deep-space missions are heavily constrained by the amount of payload mass the launch vehicle can carry. Furthermore, the amount of payload mass the launch vehicle can carry is limited by the delta-V losses of escaping both Earth’s gravity well and its atmosphere. Instead of launching the propellant mass to be used for trajectories to deep- space, if the propellant can be delivered in-space, the vehicle may carry a significantly larger payload from the surface of the Earth to the destination. Such an architecture is a paradigm shift for space exploration, enabling spacecraft to fly to the furthest reaches of the Solar System with more mass and/or in less time. An international team of sixteen students met at the 2017 Caltech Space Challenge to design Lunarport: a station which provides vehicles traveling to destinations around the solar system with propellant created from water ice extracted at the lunar south pole. A complete system concept design and architecture was produced, entitled ‘Ice Rush’, which leverages mostly TRL 6+ technology and is capable of refueling crewed Mars missions by 2032 at a total cost of $17B.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings Of
    INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY OF ASTRONAUTICS 10th IAA SYMPOSIUM ON THE FUTURE OF SPACE EXPLORATION: TOWARDS THE MOON VILLAGE AND BEYOND Torino, Italy, June 27-29, 2017 NASA’S SPACE LAUNCH SYSTEM: PROGRESS TOWARD THE PROVING GROUND Angie Jackman NASA Marshall Space Flight Center [email protected] Les Johnson NASA Marshall Space Flight Center [email protected] Abstract: With significant and substantial progress being accomplished toward readying the Space Launch System (SLS) rocket for its first test flight, work is already also underway on preparations for the second flight – using an upgraded version of the vehicle – and beyond. SLS is the most powerful human-rated launch vehicle the United States has ever undertaken, and together with the Orion spacecraft will support human exploration missions into the proving ground of cislunar space and ultimately to Mars. This paper will provide a description of the SLS vehicle, and an overview of the vehicle’s capabilities and utilization potential. Keywords: Space Launch System, SLS, Orion, Mars, Payloads 1. INTRODUCTION Conceived and designed to enable exploration and discovery in deep space, NASA’s Space Launch System represents a transformative capability for a wide range of potential missions. The exploration-class launch vehicle’s primary purpose is to provide the foundational launch capability for human exploration of deep space, propelling humans beyond low Earth orbit for the first time in almost half a century, and then supporting previously-impossible missions farther into space than ever before, demonstrating new capabilities and ultimately enabling crewed landings on Mars. In providing the performance required for those tasks, SLS offers capabilities that are paradigm-shifting for spacecraft designers and mission planners, enabling architectures and mission profiles not currently possible.
    [Show full text]
  • The Humans to Mars Report 2019 an Explore Mars, Inc
    THE HUMANS TO MARS REPORT 2019 AN EXPLORE MARS, INC. PUBLICATION HTTPS://EXPLOREMARS.ORG The HUMANS TO MARS Report 2019 Landing Humans on Mars by 2033 he Humans to Mars Report (H2MR) is an annual publication that presents a snapshot of current progress in mission architectures, science, domestic and international policy, human factors, and public perception Tregarding human missions to Mars - and highlights progress and challenges from year to year. By doing so, H2MR provides stakeholders and policy makers with an invaluable resource to assist them in making decisions that are based on current facts rather than on the dated information and speculation that sometimes tends to persist in the public arena where Mars is concerned. H2MR does not advocate any particular approach to getting to Mars, nor will this report address speculation or rumor about future architectures - except when such are impacting public perception and policy decisions. The past year has been a particularly active year with regard to space policy. The National Space Council announced that it is now the goal of the United States to return humanity to the Moon by the year 2024. According to NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine, this will help enable human missions to Mars by 2033, as required by the NASA Transition Authorization Act of 2017. This is essential as Mars exploration maintains broad-based bi-partisan support, with unwavering support coming from NASA, Congress, and industry. Public interest in Mars also remains strong, as evidenced by recent public polling. Although a recent report argued that missions to Mars in 2033 may not be feasible under certain conditions, we maintain that if the United States adopts leaner architecture approaches than those assumed in that report and if both funding and political capital are applied to the new accelerated space policy, humans on Mars in 2033 remains an achievable goal.
    [Show full text]
  • MAY 2017 | Aerospaceamerica.Org
    In this artist’s rendering of a concept for a Deep Space Gateway near the moon, an Orion spacecraft approaches from right. NASA 40 | MAY 2017 | aerospaceamerica.org 40-47_May_Mars_v1.indd 40 4/20/17 2:25 PM STRATEGIZING ABOUT MARS BY TOM RISEN | [email protected] Little consensus exists among scientists and policymakers about the best strategy for getting humans into orbit around Mars and someday to the surface. The Trump administration and a re-established U.S. National Space Council are expected to take yet another look at a possible role for the moon in the Mars strategy. Tom Risen spoke to NASA’s Bill Gerstenmaier, Mars exploration visionary Robert Zubrin and others about their views of the best path ahead. aerospaceamerica.org | MAY 2017 | 41 40-47_May_Mars_v1.indd 41 4/20/17 2:25 PM The far side of the moon never faces Earth but it gets two weeks of sun- light during each of its synchronous rotations. This would give astronauts riding in one of NASA’s forthcoming Orion capsules an opportunity to telerobotically pilot rovers on the surface while also proving the perfor- mance of equipment including communications, life support and other technology in anticipation of a voyage to Mars orbit. The crew, perhaps in the 2020s, could do all this with little propulsive energy by orbiting around a position 65,000 kilometers from the moon known as a Lagrange point, one of the gravitational sweet spots between planetary orbits, in this case between the gravity of Earth and the moon. This was one of the visions proposed before the nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Propulsion Shakedown and In-Flight Testing
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Deep Space Gateway - Enabling Missions to Mars Mars Study Capability Team – Michelle Rucker, John Connolly Introduction • The Global Exploration Roadmap reflects that human missions to Mars remain the consensus horizon goal of participating agencies – Sustainable human missions, including missions to the lunar surface, will be enabled by international cooperation • NASA analyses and planning for Mars missions have informed Global Exploration Roadmap timing and content 2 Deep Space Gateway & Transport Extensibility to Mars • There are many opportunities for commonality between Lunar vicinity and Mars mission hardware and operations – Best approach: • Identify Mars mission risks that can be bought down with testing in the Lunar vicinity • Then explore hardware and operational concepts that work for both missions with minimal compromise • Deep Space Transport will validate the systems and capabilities required to send humans to Mars orbit and return to Earth – Deep Space Gateway provides a convenient assembly, checkout, and refurbishment location to enable Mars missions • Current deep space transport concept is to fly missions of increasing complexity – Shakedown cruise, Mars orbital mission, Mars surface mission • Mars surface mission would require additional elements 3 Deep Space Gateway (DSG) Concept Phase 2: Deep Space Transport PHASE 2 Deep Space Gateway 180-Day DST Checkout and 1-Year Shakedown Cruise 4 Shakedown Cruise Simulating Key Segments of Mars Orbital Mission Simulated Segment of
    [Show full text]
  • EVA-EXP-0042 REVISION B National Aeronautics and EFFECTIVE D at E: OCTOBER 19, 2020 Space Administration
    EVA-EXP-0042 REVISION B National Aeronautics and EFFECTIVE D AT E: OCTOBER 19, 2020 Space Administration EXPLORATION EVA SYSTEM CONCEPT OF OPERATIONS “This document has been reviewed for Proprietary, SBU, and Export Control (ITAR/EAR) and has been determined to be non-sensitive. It has been released to the public via the NASA Scientific and Technical Information (STI) Process DAA Number 20205008200.” Verify that this is the correct version before use EVA-CM-001 01/28/2020 Revision: B Document No: EVA-EXP-0042 Effective Date: October 19, 2020 Page: 2 of 175 Title: Exploration EVA System Concept of Operations Prepared by: David Coan Digitally signed by David Coan (affiliate) ___________________________________________________(affiliate) Date: 2020.10.16 10:29:48 -05'00' XX/David Coan, EVA Operations & Engineering Specialist Concurred by: Digitally signed by LORI LORI CROCKER Date: 2020.10.16 11:06:58 ______________________________________________________CROCKER -05'00' XX/Lori Crocker, EVA Strategic Integration Office, Manager Approved by: Digitally signed by CHRISTOPH CHRISTOPHER HANSEN Date: 2020.10.19 09:19:13 ____________________________________________ER HANSEN -05'00' XX/Christopher P. Hansen, EVA Office, Manager "This document does not contain export control information” Revision: B Document No: EVA-EXP-0042 Effective Date: October 19, 2020 Page: 3 of 175 Title: Exploration EVA System Concept of Operations REVISION AND HISTORY PAGE Revision Change Release Description No. No. Date B Revision B (Reference EVA-CR-00082) 10/07/2020 New
    [Show full text]