Polish Death Camps Obrona

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Polish Death Camps Obrona June 2020 (REVISED) Why it matters not to refer to Nazi German camps as “Polish” Who Is Re-Writing Holocaust History? (The story you won’t find in the mainstream media) Poland’s so-called anti-defamation law1 has sparked an avalanche of harsh criticism and alarmist commentary. Extravagant claims have been made about the scope and intent of the law as, allegedly, suppressing or even forbidding discussion of Second World War crimes committed by Poles. Outrageous charges, often accompanied by unbridled hysteria, are being levelled against the Polish government, which is accused of “Holocaust denial” and even anti- Semitism. Some of these voices simply ooze hate. The Foreign Affairs and Defence Committee of the Knesset declared that “the Polish law is a crime and we will not allow it to happen.” Jack Rosen, President of the American Jewish Congress and chairman of the American Council for World Jewry, goes even further, claiming that Poland has put itself “in the same team as Iran and other Islamic terror states and the alt-right in the US and Holocaust deniers.” The anti-defamation law has also released pent-up aggression against Poles. However, the North American media rarely, if ever, mentions this aspect in the 1 On January 26, 2018 and February 1, 2018, respectively, the Seym (lower chamber) and Senate of the Polish Parliament passed legislation, commonly referred to as an “anti-defamation law,” which was proclaimed into law on February 6, 2019 by Poland’s President. It was an amendment to the 1998 Act on the Institute of National Remembrance – Commission for the Prosecution of Crimes against the Polish Nation. The government says the Act is supposed to target the use of phrases such as “Polish death camps” to describe Nazi facilities such as Auschwitz which were set up in Poland. However, critics say the Act is too broad in its application and vague in its definitions, and so it could be used to stifle historical debates, and as a weapon against critics of the government. The most significant part of the 2018 amendments to the Act is article 55a, clause 1: Whoever claims, publicly and contrary to the facts, that the Polish Nation or the Republic of Poland is responsible or co-responsible for Nazi crimes committed by the Third Reich […] or for other felonies that constitute crimes against peace, crimes against humanity or war crimes, or whoever otherwise grossly diminishes the responsibility of the true perpetrators of said crimes – shall be liable to a fine or imprisonment for up to 3 years. Another key clause is article 55a, clause 3, which protects artists and academics from prosecution: No offence is committed if the criminal act specified in clauses 1 and 2 is committed in the course of one’s artistic or academic activity. 1 tsunami of articles critical of Poland. They show no apparent concern for the many rancorous statements by prominent Jews mentioned later on. In fact, the North American media is in the forefront of the campaign to tarnish Poland’s current government. Background – A Perverse Narrative All the hysteria surrounding the new law serves one purpose: to draw attention away from a very real problem. The Canadian Polish Congress (CPC) has been exposing inaccurate and misleading descriptions of Nazi German camps in the media for several decades. The CPC was successful in obtaining two Ontario Press Council rulings (1988, 1992) that urged the press to be clear on the origin and operation of these camps. The CPC’s longstanding involvement and experience in this area allows it to speak authoritatively. Some context is required to understand what exactly the concerns are, and how they arose. Misleading descriptions of Nazi German camps started to appear in the North American media with increasing frequency after the 1978 TV miniseries The Holocaust. One of several scathing depictions of Poles in that film showed soldiers dressed in Polish military uniforms executing Jews. That was fake news. The incident didn’t happen. Unlike almost everywhere else in Europe, there were no Polish military formations in the service of the Germans. On July 2, 1979, Time Magazine used the description “Polish death camp Sobibor” in an article that made no mention of Germans, only Nazis. This is but one of many such cases. Over the years, it only got worse. What triggered the CPC’s decision to become active in media interventions in the 1980s was the response from the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) to a Polish Canadian who objected to a broadcast that described a Nazi German death camp in a misleading manner. An executive assistant at the CBC wrote back: “Our editors here say that whether one says ‘Nazi death camps in Poland’ or ‘Nazi death camps in occupied Poland’ one cannot get away from the documented fact that the extermination camps were located in Poland. In addition, the Nazis could not have administered the camps without the help of many Polish people.” (Senior officials at the CBC later dissociated themselves from this statement.) There you have it. More fake news. Do we still need reminding that camps like Auschwitz were conceived and built by the German invaders, and were operated by thousands of German personnel brought in for that purpose? Christian Poles, like Jews, populated these camps as prisoners by the hundreds of thousands – 150,000 in Auschwitz alone. Polish political prisoners, half of whom perished, were, by far, the largest group of prisoners of Auschwitz before it became a death camp for Jews in 1942, more than two years later. Yet CBC’s extensive coverage of the 70th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz (in January 2015) made no 2 mention of Polish prisoners at all. There was no mention of who set up Auschwitz, and why it was established in the first place. It was simply referred to as a camp “in Poland” of unspecified origin. (The previous year Auschwitz was described as a “Polish” camp twice in one CBC newscast.) Several Jews were interviewed for the newscast, but not one Christian Pole was featured. (The track record of CTV, another major Canadian television network, is no better.) But ignoring the Polish dimension of Nazi German genocide is not even the major problem. The CPC came to realize that references to Nazi German death and concentration camps as Polish were not, in some cases, simply benign geographical designations. Far too often there was an ugly accompanying narrative – expressed in various ways – that implicated Poland and the Poles collectively in the Holocaust. Yisrael Meir Lau, then Ashkenazi Chief Rabbi of Israel, taught that “a great many Poles cooperated with the Nazis in the annihilation, G-d forbid, of the Jewish people. The six largest extermination camps were located on Polish territory. They knew that with the loss of the Jews they would suffer dearly. But it did not deter them.” Abraham Foxman, national director of the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith, accused the Polish government of “failing to halt the methodical liquidation of its Jewish population.” Students returning from the March of the Living trips to Auschwitz and other camps gave interviews in which they stated, “At the risk of sounding prejudiced … if it was not for the Polish people, the Holocaust would not have happened.” There was no reaction from the CBC radio host. Should we be surprised? Writing in The Canadian Jewish News, Rabbi Reuven P. Bulka of Ottawa, a March of the Living student chaperon, asked rhetorically: “… how can one go to Poland, to the country so steeped in anti-Semitism that it eagerly cooperated with the Nazis in the cold-blooded murder of the Jews?” More recently, New York State Assemblyman Dov Hikind launched a website called PolandMurderedJews.com, which calls Auschwitz a “Polish death camp” and blames Poles for the crimes committed there. The problem persists and raises its ugly head time and time again precisely because it is the result of a deep-seated bias. Reporting from Warsaw on February 13, 2019, Andrea Mitchell, NBC News Chief Foreign Affairs Correspondent, stated that the 1943 Warsaw ghetto uprising was “against the Polish and Nazi regime.” Yes, in that order, with a non-existent Polish regime taking precedence over the acknowledged architects of the Holocaust who, for some reason, are not identified by their nationality. Yet another example of U.S. mainstream media endorsing the Jewish nationalist narrative and revisionist Holocaust history. 3 This was followed, later that month, by Israeli Foreign Minister Yisrael Katz resurrecting former Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir’s scandalous remarks that Poles imbibe anti-Semitism with their mother’s milk. Clearly, Katz was playing into the widespread, albeit not universal, appeal that such statements have among Israelis and Jews. These examples can be multiplied. British historian Norman Davies has called this relentless campaign of defamation “one of meanest of modern historical controversies.” After having abetted this campaign over the years, the mainstream media are now pointing their fingers at Poland as the culprit for taking steps to correct this hatefest. Prominent Historians Try to Correct the Narrative To their credit, some prominent historians spoke strongly against these defamatory allegations. Yisrael Gutman, who lived through the German occupation and was then chief historian at Yad Vashem, stated in blunt and unequivocal terms, “all accusations against the Poles that they were responsible for what is referred to as the ‘Final Solution’ are not even worth mentioning. Secondly, there is no validity at all in the contention that … Polish attitudes were the reason for the siting of the death camps in Poland.” He went on to point out that “Poland was a completely occupied country.
Recommended publications
  • The Resurgence of Antisemitic Discourse in Poland Rafał Pankowski
    Israel Journal of Foreign Affairs, 2018 https://doi.org/10.1080/23739770.2018.1492781 The Resurgence of Antisemitic Discourse in Poland Rafał Pankowski Rafał Pankowski is an associate professor in sociology at Warsaw’s Collegium Civitas University and a co-founder of the Nigdy Wiecej̨ [Never Again] Association, which monitors and combats antisemitism and xenophobia. His books include The Populist Radical Right in Poland (2010) and the forthcoming Poland: Inventing the Nation. The surge of hostility to Jews and the Jewish State in the Polish media and politics in early 2018 took many observers by surprise. For some, it was shocking to witness a virtual tidal wave of antisemitism in the mainstream discourse of one of the largest member states of the European Union—on territory which, during the German occupation, was the epicenter of the Holocaust. It was also a great shock because for many years, bilateral relations between Poland and Israel had been especially cordial and fruitful. While the history of antisemitism in Poland is relatively well known and has been thoroughly researched, few observers adequately assessed its potential as a tool with which to whip up the masses in contemporary Polish society. As late as Feb- ruary 4, 2018, Jonny Daniels, a controversial Anglo-Israeli public relations specialist frequently quoted in the Polish media on Jewish issues, boldly declared, “There is no such thing as Polish antisemitism.”1 Daniels, who mysteriously sur- faced in Poland after the elections in 2015 that brought the radical, right-wing Prawo i Sprawiedliwosċ́(PiS) party to power, became the Orthodox Jewish poster boy of the Polish right.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish-Polish-German Realms of Memory a Triple
    Partner of the conference: CONFERENCE 4 – 5 SEPTEMBER 2019 Zentrum für Historische Forschung Berlin der Polnischen Akademie der Wissenschaften JEWISH-POLISH-GERMAN Majakowskiring 47 13156 Berlin REALMS OF MEMORY Tel. +49 30 486 285 40 Faks: +49 30 486 285 56 A TRIPLE NEIGHBORHOOD e-mail: [email protected] www.cbh.pan.pl/de CONFERENCE JEWISH-POLISH-GERMAN REALMS OF MEMORY 4 SEPTEMBER Screenshot from the film „The Promised Land” © Studio Filmowe ZEBRA A TRIPLE NEIGHBORHOOD 9.00 Conference opening and welcome Igor Kąkolewski (Center for Historical Research Polish Academy of Sciences), Małgorzata Stolarska-Fronia (Center for Historical Research Polish Academy of Sciences) 9.15 Igor Kąkolewski (Center for Historical Research Polish Academy of Sciences), Ha-mekomot. Jewish-Polish-German realms of memory. A triple neighborhood 9. 30 Key-note lecture Gertrud Pickhan (Freie Universität Berlin), "I am small, but important". The Reception of Janusz Korczak in the GDR 10. 30 Coffee break 11. 00 ASHKENAZ - BETWEEN POLAND AND GERMANY Chair: Jeanette Hoffmann Madeleine Cohen (Yiddish Book Center, Amherst), Do’ikayt and the Politics of Place in Modern Yiddish Culture 5 SEPTEMBER Małgorzata Stolarska-Fronia (Center for Historical Research PAN, Berlin), The image of the Ostjude in the art Johannes Czakai (Freie Universität, Berlin), Jewish Family Names in Polish and German Memory 10.00 REALMS OF MEMORY IN EDUCATION Małgorzata A. Quinkenstein, The Kitchen – a meeting place and realm of memory. Longue durée of Ashkenazi cuisine in Polish and German traditions Chair: Lidia Zessin-Jurek Jeanette Hoffmann (TU Dresden), Remembering Jewish-Polish-German History while Reading and Talking 12.30 Discussion about Contemporary Historical Young-Adult Literature in Classrooms in Germany and in Poland 12.45 Lunch Jacek Konik (The Warsaw Family Alliance Institute of Higher Education), History of Jews in Polish memory.
    [Show full text]
  • On Robert Alter's Bible
    Barbara S. Burstin Pittsburgh's Jews and the Tree of Life JEWISH REVIEW OF BOOKS Volume 9, Number 4 Winter 2019 $10.45 On Robert Alter’s Bible Adele Berlin David Bentley Hart Shai Held Ronald Hendel Adam Kirsch Aviya Kushner Editor Abraham Socher BRANDEIS Senior Contributing Editor Allan Arkush UNIVERSITY PRESS Art Director Spinoza’s Challenge to Jewish Thought Betsy Klarfeld Writings on His Life, Philosophy, and Legacy Managing Editor Edited by Daniel B. Schwartz Amy Newman Smith “This collection of Jewish views on, and responses to, Spinoza over Web Editor the centuries is an extremely useful addition to the literature. That Rachel Scheinerman it has been edited by an expert on Spinoza’s legacy in the Jewish Editorial Assistant world only adds to its value.” Kate Elinsky Steven Nadler, University of Wisconsin March 2019 Editorial Board Robert Alter Shlomo Avineri Leora Batnitzky Ruth Gavison Moshe Halbertal Hillel Halkin Jon D. Levenson Anita Shapira Michael Walzer J. H.H. Weiler Ruth R. Wisse Steven J. Zipperstein Executive Director Eric Cohen Publisher Gil Press Chairman’s Council Blavatnik Family Foundation Publication Committee The Donigers of Not Bad for The Soul of the Stranger Marilyn and Michael Fedak Great Neck Delancey Street Reading God and Torah from A Mythologized Memoir The Rise of Billy Rose a Transgender Perspective Ahuva and Martin J. Gross Wendy Doniger Mark Cohen Joy Ladin Susan and Roger Hertog Roy J. Katzovicz “Walking through the snow to see “Comprehensive biography . “This heartfelt, difficult work will Wendy at the stately, gracious compelling story. Highly introduce Jews and other readers The Lauder Foundation– home of Rita and Lester Doniger recommended.” of the Torah to fresh, sensitive Leonard and Judy Lauder will forever remain in my memory.” Library Journal (starred review) approaches with room for broader Sandra Earl Mintz Francis Ford Coppola human dignity.” Tina and Steven Price Charitable Foundation Publishers Weekly (starred review) March 2019 Pamela and George Rohr Daniel Senor The Lost Library Jewish Legal Paul E.
    [Show full text]
  • Poles As Pigs in MAUS the Problems with Spiegelman’S MAUS
    May 2019 Poles as Pigs in MAUS The Problems with Spiegelman’s MAUS Spiegelman’s representation of Poles as pigs is “a calculated insult” leveled against Poles. The Norton Anthology of American Literature, 7th edition Maus made me feel that Poland was somehow responsible for the Holocaust, or at least that many Poles collaborated in it.1 These materials were prepared for the Canadian Polish Congress by a team of researchers and reviewed for accuracy by historians at the Institute for World Politics, Washington, DC. 1. Background MAUS is a comic book – sometimes called a graphic novel – authored by American cartoonist Art Spiegelman. The core of the book is an extended interview by the author/narrator with his father, a Polish Jew named Vladek, focusing on his experiences as a Holocaust survivor. Although MAUS has been described as both a memoir and fiction, it is widely treated as non-fiction. Time placed it on their list of non-fiction books. MAUS is considered to be a postmodern book. It is a story about storytelling that weaves several conflicting narratives (historical, psychological and autobiographical). The book employs various postmodern techniques as well as older literary devices. A prominent feature of the book is the author’s depiction of 1 Seth J. Frantzman, “Setting History Straight – Poland Resisted Nazis,” Jerusalem Post, January 29, 2018. 1 national groups in the form of different kinds of animals: Jews are drawn as mice, Germans as cats, and (Christian) Poles as pigs. MAUS has been taught widely in U.S. high schools, and even elementary schools, as part of the literature curriculum for many years.
    [Show full text]
  • Polish Death Camps Obrona
    December 2019 (REVISED) Why it matters not to refer to Nazi German camps as “Polish” The story you won’t find in the North American mainstream media Poland’s new anti-defamation law has sparked an avalanche of alarmist commentary and harsh criticism.1 Extravagant claims have been made about the scope and intent of the law as, allegedly, suppressing discussion of Second World War crimes committed by Poles. Outrageous charges, often accompanied by unbridled hysteria, are being levelled against the Polish government, which is accused of “Holocaust denial” and even anti-Semitism. The Foreign Affairs and Defence Committee of the Knesset declared that “the Polish law is a crime and we will not allow it to happen.” Jack Rosen, President of the American Jewish Congress and chairman of the American Council for World Jewry, goes even further, claiming that Poland has put itself “in the same team as Iran and other Islamic terror states and the alt-right in the US and Holocaust deniers.” The anti-defamation law has also released pent-up aggression against Poles. However, the North American media rarely, if ever, mentions this aspect in the tsunami of articles critical of Poland. They show no apparent concern for the many rancorous statements by prominent Jews mentioned later on. In fact, the 1 On January 26, 2018 and February 1, 2018, respectively, the Seym (lower chamber) and Senate of the Polish Parliament passed legislation, commonly referred to as an “anti-defamation law,” which was proclaimed into law on February 6, 2019 by Poland’s President. It was an amendment to the 1998 Act on the Institute of National Remembrance – Commission for the Prosecution of Crimes against the Polish Nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Szymon Datner German Nazi Crimes Against Jews Who
    JEWISH HISTORICAL INSTITUTE BULLETIN NO. 75 (1970) SZYMON DATNER GERMAN NAZI CRIMES AGAINST JEWS WHO ESCAPED FROM THE GHETTOES “LEGAL” THREATS AND ORDINANCES REGARDING JEWS AND THE POLES WHO HELPED THEM Among other things, the “final solution of the Jewish question” required that Jews be prohibited from leaving the ghettoes they were living in—which typically were fenced off and under guard. The occupation authorities issued inhumane ordinances to that effect. In his ordinance of October 15, 1941, Hans Frank imposed draconian penalties on Jews who escaped from the ghettoes and on Poles who would help them escape or give them shelter: “§ 4b (1) Jews who leave their designated quarter without authorisation shall be punished by death. The same penalty shall apply to persons who knowingly shelter such Jews. (2) Those who instigate and aid and abet shall be punished with the same penalty as the perpetrator; acts attempted shall be punished as acts committed. A penalty of severe prison sentence or prison sentence may be imposed for minor offences. (3) Sentences shall be passed by special courts.” 1 In the reality of the General Government (GG), § 4b (3) was never applied to runaway Jews. They would be killed on capture or escorted to the nearest police, gendarmerie, Gestapo or Kripo station and, after being identified as Jews and tortured to give away those who helped or sheltered them, summarily executed. Many times the same fate befell Poles, too, particularly those living in remote settlements and woodlands. The cases of Poles who helped Jews, which were examined by special courts, raised doubts even among the judges of this infamous institution because the only penalty stipulated by law (death) was so draconian.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Behavior During the Holocaust
    VICTIMS’ POLITICS: JEWISH BEHAVIOR DURING THE HOLOCAUST by Evgeny Finkel A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Political Science) at the UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN–MADISON 2012 Date of final oral examination: 07/12/12 The dissertation is approved by the following members of the Final Oral Committee: Yoshiko M. Herrera, Associate Professor, Political Science Scott G. Gehlbach, Professor, Political Science Andrew Kydd, Associate Professor, Political Science Nadav G. Shelef, Assistant Professor, Political Science Scott Straus, Professor, International Studies © Copyright by Evgeny Finkel 2012 All Rights Reserved i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This dissertation could not have been written without the encouragement, support and help of many people to whom I am grateful and feel intellectually, personally, and emotionally indebted. Throughout the whole period of my graduate studies Yoshiko Herrera has been the advisor most comparativists can only dream of. Her endless enthusiasm for this project, razor- sharp comments, constant encouragement to think broadly, theoretically, and not to fear uncharted grounds were exactly what I needed. Nadav Shelef has been extremely generous with his time, support, advice, and encouragement since my first day in graduate school. I always knew that a couple of hours after I sent him a chapter, there would be a detailed, careful, thoughtful, constructive, and critical (when needed) reaction to it waiting in my inbox. This awareness has made the process of writing a dissertation much less frustrating then it could have been. In the future, if I am able to do for my students even a half of what Nadav has done for me, I will consider myself an excellent teacher and mentor.
    [Show full text]
  • Rigorózní Práce
    Univerzita Karlova Filozofická fakulta Ústav světových dějin Rigorózní práce Mgr. Tomáš Blümel Příspěvek ke studiu ozbrojeného neorganizovaného odporu proti nacistické/fašistické okupační moci za druhé světové války zemí Visegrádské skupiny ve filmu Contribution to the Study of Military Non-organized Resistance Movement against Nazi/Fascist Occupied Power during WWII in the Lands of the Visegrad group in the Big Screen Praha 2020 Poděkování Na tomto místě bych rád poděkoval profesorovi PhDr. Martinu Kovářovi, Ph.D., zároveň vedoucímu mé diplomové práce, který mi byl vždy oporou při studiu filmové problematiky, a který mi na počátku vytváření rigorózní práce pomohl s vhodným vymezením tématu. Rovněž jsem vděčný za jeho odborné rady a věcné připomínky. Za výpomoc při překladu filmu Budapešťský anděl ze španělského jazyka děkuji belgickým přátelům, zejména Alexie Rojas Espiose. Nemohu opomenout ani ředitelku Ústřední knihovny UK, PhDr. Radku Římanovou, Ph.D, které tímto děkuji za příležitost pracovně se rozvíjet v univerzitních prostorách, čímž jsem zůstal v úzkém kontaktu s akademickým prostředím. V neposlední řadě děkuji své rodině, která mě po celou dobu psaní práce podporovala. Prohlašuji, že jsem rigorózní práci vypracoval samostatně, že jsem řádně citoval všechny prameny a literaturu a že práce nebyla využita v rámci jiného vysokoškolského studia či k získání jiného nebo stejného titulu. V Praze, dne …………………………………… Mgr. Tomáš Blümel Klíčová slova (česky) Ozbrojený odpor; protinacistický odboj; protifašistický odboj; druhá světová válka; Visegrádská skupina; historický film; kultura paměti Klíčová slova (anglicky) Armed Resistance; Anti-nazi Resistance; Antinacist Resistance; World War II., Visegrad Group, Historical Film; Culture of Memory Abstrakt V rigorózní práci se zabývám ozbrojeným neorganizovaným odporem proti nacistické/fašistické okupační moci za druhé světové války v historickém filmu.
    [Show full text]
  • Bruno Kamiński
    Fear Management. Foreign threats in the postwar Polish propaganda – the influence and the reception of the communist media (1944 -1956) Bruno Kamiński Thesis submitted for assessment with a view to obtaining the degree of Doctor of History and Civilization of the European University Institute Florence, 14 June 2016 European University Institute Department of History and Civilization Fear Management. Foreign threats in the postwar Polish propaganda – the influence and the reception of the communist media (1944 -1956) Bruno Kamiński Thesis submitted for assessment with a view to obtaining the degree of Doctor of History and Civilization of the European University Institute Examining Board Prof. Pavel Kolář (EUI) - Supervisor Prof. Alexander Etkind (EUI) Prof. Anita Prażmowska (London School Of Economics) Prof. Dariusz Stola (University of Warsaw and Polish Academy of Science) © Bruno Kamiński, 2016 No part of this thesis may be copied, reproduced or transmitted without prior permission of the author Researcher declaration to accompany the submission of written work Department of History and Civilization - Doctoral Programme I <Bruno Kamiński> certify that I am the author of the work < Fear Management. Foreign threats in the postwar Polish propaganda – the influence and the reception of the communist media (1944 -1956)> I have presented for examination for the Ph.D. at the European University Institute. I also certify that this is solely my own original work, other than where I have clearly indicated, in this declaration and in the thesis, that it is the work of others. I warrant that I have obtained all the permissions required for using any material from other copyrighted publications.
    [Show full text]
  • 18 Zygmunt Woźniczka Która — Jako Kilkunastoletnia Dziewczyna — Trafiła Do Obozu Wraz Z Matką
    D Z IE JE NAJNOWSZE, ROCZNIK XXXI — 1999, 4 PL ISSN 0419-8824 Zygmunt Woźniczka Katowice Obóz pracy w Świętochłowicach-Zgodzie i jego komendant Istnienie obozu w Świetochłowicach-Zgodzie i działalność jego komendanta Salomona Morela długo pozostawała jedynie w pamięci ocalałych więźniów. Cała sprawa wyszła na jaw za sprawą amerykańskiego dziennikarza żydowskiego pochodzenia Johna Sacka, który poznał przypadkowo w USA córkę Loli Polok i przyjechał do Katowic w maju 1989 r., aby napisać książkę o ciekawych i tragicznych losach jej matki. Lola była bowiem jedną z nielicznych ocalałych osób żydowskiego pochodzenia z Będzina, które po wojnie pracowały w aparacie bezpieczeństwa na Górnym Śląsku; potem uciekła na Zachód. Zbierając materiały do książki „zaprzyjaźnił” się Sack z Salomonem Morelem, który znał Lolę. Jak pisał Morel w paździer­ niku 1993 r. w liście do ówczesnego ministra sprawiedliwości Włodzimierza Cimoszewicza: „Ten łajdak Jack zmienił kurs i napisał książkę o Żydach, którzy po wojnie pracowali w apa­ racie ucisku, a przede wszystkim o mnie (...) Jak można się dopuścić takiej podłości, nie potrafię pojąć”1. W 1993 r. ukazał się w Stanach Zjednoczonych artykuł Sacka pt. Gniew Salomona na łamach „The Village Voice”, który został przedrukowany w Izraelu, m.in. w gazecie „Marin”. Następnie wyszła po angielsku książka Sacka pt. Oko za oko wydana także i w Polsce2. Mimo to Sack słał listy do Morela, w których tłumaczył się, dlaczego musiał o tym wszystkim napisać. Informował go także, jakie są postępy śledztwa prowadzonego przeciwko niemu przez Prokuraturę w Katowicach, i zapowiadał Morelowi, że w 1993 r. będzie sądzony3. Cała sprawa stawała się głośna i w kraju4.
    [Show full text]
  • Moskiewskie Korzenie Komunistycznej Elity Władzy W Polsce
    Wrocławskie Studia Wschodnie 21 (2017) Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego Mirosław szuMiło Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej w Lublinie, Instytut Pamięci Narodowej Moskiewskie korzenie komunistycznej elity władzy w Polsce W powszechnej świadomości funkcjonuje słuszne przekonanie, że władza ko- munistyczna została przywieziona do Polski na sowieckich bagnetach. W niniej- szym tekście chciałbym przyjrzeć się owym moskiewskim korzeniom elity komunistycznej sprawującej władzę w tzw. Polsce Ludowej. Spróbuję okre- ślić formy i metody kształtowania przyszłych kadr rządzących naszym krajem przez Komintern (Międzynarodówkę Komunistyczną) i NKWD oraz rzeczy- wisty (ilościowy i jakościowy) udział tych ludzi w powojennej elicie władzy. Pod pojęciem „elita władzy” rozumiem elitę rzeczywistą PPR i PZPR, do której oprócz członków kierownictwa partii (Biura Politycznego i Sekretariatu KC) należy zaliczyć osoby zajmujące najwyższe stanowiska kierownicze w róż- nych segmentach aparatu władzy na szczeblu centralnym: kierowników wydzia- łów KC PPR/PZPR, członków Rady Ministrów i Prezydium KRN, a od 1947 r. Rady Państwa, wiceministrów i dyrektorów departamentów w Ministerstwie Bezpieczeństwa Publicznego, a później MSW, oraz członków tzw. Zespołu Partyjnego MON. Ponadto uwzględniam I sekretarzy komitetów wojewódzkich PPR/PZPR jako najważniejsze osoby na poziomie województwa. W powojennej elicie władzy zdecydowanie przeważali dawni członkowie Komunistycznej Partii Polski (KPP) lub Komunistycznego Związku Mło- dzieży Polski (KZMP). W latach 1944–1948 przedwojenni komuniści, tzw. kapepowcy, stanowili 90% elity PPR1. Działaczom komunistycznym w II Rzeczypospolitej przez cały czas przyświecała myśl o zwycięstwie rewo- lucji i objęciu władzy w Polskiej Republice Rad. Ich sowieccy protektorzy starali się przygotowywać odpowiednie, z punktu widzenia Moskwy, kadry polskich komunistów. Podstawową formą selekcji było prawdopodobnie 1 Dokładna analiza elity PPR zob. M. Szumiło, Elita Polskiej Partii Robotniczej (1944– 1948).
    [Show full text]
  • Polish Army Order of Battle in 1939 - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia 12/18/15, 12:50 AM Polish Army Order of Battle in 1939 from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    Polish army order of battle in 1939 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 12/18/15, 12:50 AM Polish army order of battle in 1939 From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Polish OOB during the Invasion of Poland. In the late thirties Polish headquarters prepared "Plan Zachód" (Plan "West), a plan of mobilization of Polish Army in case of war with Germany. Earlier, the Poles did not regard the Germans as their main threat, priority was given to threat from the Soviets (see: Plan East). The overall operational plan assumed the creation of 30 infantry divisions, 9 reserve divisions, 11 cavalry brigades, two motorized brigades, 3 mountain brigades and a number of smaller units. Most Polish forces were grouped into 6 armies and a number of corps-sized "Operational Groups". Later in the course of the war other operational units were created. Contents 1 Armies 1.1 Karpaty Army 1.2 Kraków Army 1.3 Lublin Army Placement of Polish divisions on September 1st 1.4 Łódź Army 1.5 Modlin Army 1.6 Pomorze Army 1.7 Poznań Army 1.8 Prusy Army 1.9 Warszawa Army 2 Operational Groups 2.1 Operational Group Wyszków https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish_army_order_of_battle_in_1939 Page 1 of 9 Polish army order of battle in 1939 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 12/18/15, 12:50 AM 2.2 Independent Operational Group Narew 2.3 Independent Operational Group Polesie 3 Supporting forces 4 See also Armies Karpaty Army Placement of divisions on September 1, 1939 Created on July 11, 1939, under Major General Kazimierz Fabrycy. Armia Karpaty was created after Germany annexed Czechoslovakia and created a puppet state of Slovakia.
    [Show full text]