DOCSLIB.ORG

Greater Sisters CWPP 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Greater Sisters CWPP 2019 Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................................ ii Declaration of Agreement ............................................................................................................................................... vii Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................................................................... viii Contact information ........................................................................................................................................................ ix Purpose ............................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Planning Summary .......................................................................................................................................................... 3 Collaboration ................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Community Profile .......................................................................................................................................................... 7 Public and Private Accomplishments ............................................................................................................................ 9 Oregon Forestland – Urban Interface Fire Protection Act of 1997 (SB 360) ........................................... 14 Community Base Maps ................................................................................................................................................... 19 Wildland Urban Interface Description ......................................................................................................... 19 Fuel Hazards and Ecotypes ............................................................................................................................ 20 Communities at Risk ....................................................................................................................................... 23 Community Assessment of Risk ..................................................................................................................................... 24 Protection Capability ...................................................................................................................................... 24 Values Protected .............................................................................................................................................. 27 Other Community Values ............................................................................................................................... 27 Structural Vulnerability ................................................................................................................................. 28 Areas of Special Concern ................................................................................................................................ 28 Prioritized Hazard Reduction Recommendations and Preferred Treatment Methods ....................................................................................................................... 30 Goals ................................................................................................................................................................. 30 Preferred Treatments – Public Lands .......................................................................................................... 30 Preferred Treatments – Private and County Owned Lands ...................................................................... 32 Recommendations to Reduce Structural Vulnerability ............................................................................................... 33 Structural Vulnerability ................................................................................................................................ 33 Defensible space checklist ............................................................................................................................... 34 Education ......................................................................................................................................................... 35 Action Plan and Implementation ................................................................................................................................... 37 Improving Fire Protection Capabilities ....................................................................................................... 37 Working Toward a more Fire-Adapted Community ................................................................................... 39 Restoring Fire Resilient Landscapes ............................................................................................................. 40 Evaluation and Monitoring ............................................................................................................................................ 42 Appendices Appendix A – Oregon Wildfire Risk Explorer Report with Maps ............................................................. 44 Appendix B – Glossary of Terms ................................................................................................................... 78 Appendix C – Post Fire Recovery .................................................................................................................. 82 i Greater Sisters Country CWPP - 2019 Executive Summary Purpose Community Wildfire Protection Plans (CWPPs) are documents that are designed by a local group of stakeholders who are invested in the wildland fire threat to their area. The group of stakeholders typically consists of a representative from the fire department(s), the state Forestry Department, any governing bodies and especially property owners. Each of these representatives should bring their concerns regarding wildland fire to the discussion and propose solutions to their concerns. Although reducing the risk of high-intensity wildland fire is the primary motivation behind this plan, managing the larger landscape to restore forest health and more resilient conditions and improving fire response by all fire agencies are also discussed and addressed in the action plan. Continued efforts have been made by County, State, and Federal land management agencies to reduce the threat of high-intensity wildland fires through education and fuels reduction activities on public lands. In addition, private property owners have responded enthusiastically to the defensible space and preparation guidelines and recommendations to reduce hazardous fuels on their own properties by participating in programs such as Firewise and FireFree. All of these activities allow the Greater Sisters Country Area to become a more Fire Adapted Community. Since its creation in 2005, the Greater Sisters Country Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) has been revised three times (2006, 2009 and 2014) by a local steering committee to be applied as it was intended by a wide variety of private landowners and public agencies to decrease the risks of high-intensity wildfire in the Greater Sisters Country Area. The 2019 Greater Sisters Country CWPP will assist agencies and local property owners in the identification and prioritization of all lands, including surrounding public lands that are at risk from high-intensity wildland fire. The Greater Sisters Country CWPP identifies priorities and strategies for reducing hazardous wildland fuels while improving forest health, supporting local industry, and economy and improving fire protection capabilities. Addressing these goals in a cooperative, collaborative manner maintains alignment with the goals outlined in the National Cohesive Wildland Fire Management Strategy (Cohesive Strategy) – resilient landscapes, Fire Adapted Communities, and safe and effective wildfire response. For more information on Cohesive Strategy, visit http://www.forestsandrangelands.gov/. ii Greater Sisters Country CWPP - 2019 The goals of the Greater Sisters Country CWPP are to: • Protect lives and property from wildland fires; • Instill a sense of responsibility among residents, visitors, conservation groups and federal, state and local agencies to take preventive actions regarding wildland fire; • Provide guidance to federal agencies for implementing fuels reduction treatments; • Prioritize the use of limited funds for the treatment of hazardous fuels; • Create and maintain fire-adapted communities; • Increase public understanding of living in a fire-adapted ecosystem; • Increase the community’s ability to prepare for, respond to and recover from wildland fires; • Restore fire-adapted ecosystems with diverse, multi-structured forests emphasizing large ponderosa pine trees; • Improve the fire resilience of the landscape while protecting other social, economic and ecological values. The Greater Sisters Country CWPP integrates information from a variety of sources to present a comprehensive picture of risk and possible treatments on the landscape and enable community organizations and their partners to act in a coordinated fashion. A completed plan also allows the adjacent federal land management agencies to make
Load more

Recommended publications
  • High Desert Oasis Delivers on Its Relaxation Promise | Lifestyles | Eugene, Oregon
    8/3/2016 High desert oasis delivers on its relaxation promise | Lifestyles | Eugene, Oregon AUGUST 1, 2016 SUBSCRIBER SERVICES The Register-Guard LIFE LIFESTYLES NORTHWEST TRAVEL High desert oasis delivers on its relaxation promise Black Butte Ranch goes low­key as other resorts go big 1/4 – A family of four rides bicycles past Phalarope Lake at Black Butte Ranch. There are more than 18 miles of paved trails at the Central Oregon resort. (Submitted photo) BY JOHN GOTTBERG ANDERSON For The Register‐Guard JULY 31, 2016 http://registerguard.com/rg/life/lifestyles/34615355­74/high­desert­oasis­delivers­on­its­relaxation­promise.html.csp# 1/7 8/3/2016 High desert oasis delivers on its relaxation promise | Lifestyles | Eugene, Oregon LACK BUTTE RANCH — Miles of gentle foot and bicycle trails wind around Phalarope Lake and follow a linked series of B ponds to the source waters of Indian Ford Creek. They skirt a white‐barked aspen grove and cross marshy Big Meadow, sharing the grasses with horses and livestock, on a nature trail with viewing areas for dozens of colorful species of birds. This is summer at the 1,830‐acre Black Butte Ranch. The nearest Central Oregon resort to the Willamette Valley, just 100 miles east of Eugene via Santiam Pass, the 45‐year‐old destination property delivers on a promise of relaxation. Families may enjoy summer visits when swimming pools are open and other activities, including golf, tennis and horseback riding, are going full bore, but Black Butte Ranch, known as BBR, thrives on serenity. Other resorts are all about hustle and bustle, but Black Butte even banishes overhead street lights, enhancing a “night sky” program that makes the heavens come alive.
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Survey of Upper Deschutes River Area, Oregon, Including Parts of Deschutes, Jefferson, and Klamath Counties
    United States In cooperation with Department of United States Department Agriculture of Agriculture, Forest Soil Survey of Service; United States Natural Department of the Interior, Upper Deschutes Resources Bureau of Land Conservation Management; and Oregon Service Agricultural Experiment River Area, Station Oregon, including parts of Deschutes, Jefferson, and Klamath Counties 3 How to Use This Soil Survey General Soil Map The general soil map, which is a color map, shows the survey area divided into groups of associated soils called general soil map units. This map is useful in planning the use and management of large areas. To find information about your area of interest, locate that area on the map, identify the name of the map unit in the area on the color-coded map legend, then refer to the section General Soil Map Units for a general description of the soils in your area. Detailed Soil Maps The detailed soil maps can be useful in planning the use and management of small areas. To find information about your area of interest, locate that area on the Index to Map Sheets. Note the number of the map sheet and turn to that sheet. Locate your area of interest on the map sheet. Note the map unit symbols that are in that area. Turn to the Contents, which lists the map units by symbol and name and shows the page where each map unit is described. The Contents shows which table has data on a specific land use for each detailed soil map unit. Also see the Contents for sections of this publication that may address your specific needs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Crooked River Ranch “Telegraph” Paid Terrebonne, OR Permit No
    PRSRT STD U.S. Postage The Crooked River Ranch “Telegraph” Paid Terrebonne, OR Permit No. 5195 Crooked River Ranch C& MA 5195 SW Clubhouse Road Crooked River Ranch, OR 97760 Phone—541-548-8939 Breaking Address Label news! Jefferson County Board of Commissioners Meeting HOA and Community Life at March 8, 2017 Crooked River Ranch in the 6:00 p.m. Heart of Central Oregon Juniper Room March, 2017 URGENT! Cost, logistics, pros and cons discussed….. Learn about the Crooked River Enhanced Sheriff Patrol on Ranch Ranch Budget before it’s adopted! discussed at Town Hall meeting by Marilynne Keyser, Chair, CRR Budget/Audit Committee By Jim Adkins, Jefferson County Sheriff Some residents living on really want. What level of service Crooked River Ranch have been do you want? We are okay with asking the Home Owners Associa- whatever decision you, “the boss” tion Board and me, the Sheriff of makes. This is a serious matter and I Jefferson County, about the possi- want to help you make an informed bilities of assigning deputies specifi- decision. cally to CRR or increasing the num- Currently, I have my depu- ber of patrols on the Ranch. They ties patrol CRR in the following want to see an increase in traffic manner: When there is a call for safety operations and more roving service at CRR, they respond as patrols. There are other residents soon as possible. CRR calls must be who do not think it is necessary to prioritized along with the other calls have enhanced patrols on the Ranch from other parts of the county.
    [Show full text]
  • Volcanic Vistas Discover National Forests in Central Oregon Summer 2009 Celebrating the Re-Opening of Lava Lands Visitor Center Inside
    Volcanic Vistas Discover National Forests in Central Oregon Summer 2009 Celebrating the re-opening of Lava Lands Visitor Center Inside.... Be Safe! 2 LAWRENCE A. CHITWOOD Go To Special Places 3 EXHIBIT HALL Lava Lands Visitor Center 4-5 DEDICATED MAY 30, 2009 Experience Today 6 For a Better Tomorrow 7 The Exhibit Hall at Lava Lands Visitor Center is dedicated in memory of Explore Newberry Volcano 8-9 Larry Chitwood with deep gratitude for his significant contributions enlightening many students of the landscape now and in the future. Forest Restoration 10 Discover the Natural World 11-13 Lawrence A. Chitwood Discovery in the Kids Corner 14 (August 4, 1942 - January 4, 2008) Take the Road Less Traveled 15 Larry was a geologist for the Deschutes National Forest from 1972 until his Get High on Nature 16 retirement in June 2007. Larry was deeply involved in the creation of Newberry National Volcanic Monument and with the exhibits dedicated in 2009 at Lava Lands What's Your Interest? Visitor Center. He was well known throughout the The Deschutes and Ochoco National Forests are a recre- geologic and scientific communities for his enthusiastic support for those wishing ation haven. There are 2.5 million acres of forest including to learn more about Central Oregon. seven wilderness areas comprising 200,000 acres, six rivers, Larry was a gifted storyteller and an ever- 157 lakes and reservoirs, approximately 1,600 miles of trails, flowing source of knowledge. Lava Lands Visitor Center and the unique landscape of Newberry National Volcanic Monument. Explore snow- capped mountains or splash through whitewater rapids; there is something for everyone.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Whychus Creek Monitoring Report
    Upper Deschutes Watershed Council Technical Report 2015 Whychus Creek Monitoring Report Mork, L. and Houston, R. Editors Upper Deschutes Watershed Council Bend, OR December 2016 i Suggested Citation Formats Entire report: Mork L, Houston R, Editors. 2016. 2015 Whychus Creek Monitoring Report. Upper Deschutes Watershed Council. Bend, Oregon. 144 p. Chapters: Mork L. 2016. “Restoration effectiveness monitoring in Whychus Creek.” Pages 1-8 in Mork L, Houston R, Editors. 2015 Whychus Creek Monitoring Report. Upper Deschutes Watershed Council. Bend, Oregon. 144 p. ii Table of Contents Table of Contents .......................................................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................................................... iii Symbols and Abbreviations .......................................................................................................................... iv Restoration Effectiveness Monitoring in Whychus Creek ............................................................................ 1 Whychus Creek Stream Flow Report ............................................................................................................ 9 Whychus Creek Water Quality Status, Temperature Trends, and Stream Flow Restoration Targets ........ 22 Stream Connectivity in Whychus Creek .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Whychus Creek Students, Streams & Stewardship
    Whychus Creek Students, Streams & Stewardship PRODUCED BY UPPER DESCHUTES WATERSHED COUNCIL WRITTEN AND EDITED BY KOLLEEN MILLER & KELLY BECK DESIGN BY CASEY DAVIS ARTWORK & JOURNAL WRITING BY LOCAL STUDENTS FUNDED BY Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board The Roundhouse Foundation Clabough Foundation The Environmental Protection Agency 2016 www.UpperDeschutesWatershedCouncil.org 2 3 Trees sway in the breeze. Their needles fall like pinecones. They drift slowly down. Chloe FOURTH GRADE STUDENT, CASCADES ACADEMY The Upstream Project Ridgeview High School students helped restore willows to the banks of Whychus Creek. he Upper Deschutes Watershed Council seeks to protect and restore the rivers and streams throughout Central Oregon through collaborative projects in res- toration, monitoring, and education. Our education program, The Upstream Project, works with thousands of students, teachers, and parents every year to guide communi- ty members to develop a long-term sense of watershed stewardship. When integrated effectively, restoration, monitoring, and education create valuable lasting benefits for an entire watershed community. Everyone who inhabits the watershed, including fish, wildlife, private landowners, public land managers, children, parents, teachers, and civic leaders benefits from collaborative watershed outreach and restoration. Our watershed outreach goals are to connect community members to our watershed through hands-on stewardship projects. We have been coordinating on- the-ground restoration and outreach activities in the Whychus watershed since 2006 and, by engaging students, teachers, and community members in these ac- tivities, we have sought to foster a widespread sense of stewardship for Whychus Creek. The reintroduction of salmon and steelhead and renewed streamflows in Whychus are now joined by an invigorated community embrace for a creek that once ran completely dry.
    [Show full text]
  • And Post-Laramide Geology of the South-Central
    Syn- and post-Laramide geology of the south-central Gravelly Range, southwestern Montana by Ernest Jan Luikart A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Earth Sciences Montana State University © Copyright by Ernest Jan Luikart (1997) Abstract: The geologic history of post-Laramide basin evolution in the foreland of southwestern Montana has been a matter of controversy. A complex assemblage of Upper Cretaceous to Tertiary sedimentary and volcanic rocks which record some of that history are exposed on and near the crest of the Gravelly Range. Past interpretations of their relations and tectonic implications conflict. The present investigation of a portion of the southern Gravelly Range crest helps to resolve the physical stratigraphy and ages of the post-Laramide deposits and suggests the following sequence of events: (1) syn- and post-Laramide erosional beveling of the Madison-Gravelly arch; (2) Late Cretaceous deposition of quartzite gravel from a thrust belt source, locally containing Archean metamorphic clasts from a foreland source; (3) conformable transition to deposition of limestone conglomerate derived from the Blacktail-Snowcrest arch, with interbedded siltstone, sandstone and lacustrine limestone, deposited prior to the end of Laramide deformation; (4) final movement of Laramide faults; (5) erosion represented by a 28-38 my-long unconformity; (6) deposition of tuffaceous mudstones beginning in the Duchesnean (40-37 Ma) and proceeding into the Whitneyan (32-29 Ma) interrupted by erosion at about 32 Ma; (7) eruption of basalt flows from local vents between 33 and 30 Ma; (8) minor erosion followed by early Miocene (23 Ma) eruption of an isolated mafic volcanic center; (9) emplacement of Huckleberry Ridge Tuff at 2.1 Ma after erosion or nondeposition of Miocene strata; (10) significant uplift of the range in Quaternary time; (11) Pleistocene deposition of glacial moraines in the deeper valleys, and ongoing mass-movement and colluvial processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of 1997–2008 Groundwater Level Changes in the Upper Deschutes Basin, Central Oregon
    Prepared in cooperation with the Oregon Water Resources Department Analysis of 1997–2008 Groundwater Level Changes in the Upper Deschutes Basin, Central Oregon Scientific Investigations Report 2013–5092 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: Upper Left: Irrigation diversion dam on the Deschutes River in Bend, Oregon, May 2002. Upper Right: Groundwater-fed wetland between Cultus Lake and Crane Prairie Reservoir, August 2012. Lower Left: Headwater spring feeding Fall River, Oregon, May 2002. Lower right: Strata of the Deschutes Formation and overlying lavas exposed along the Crooked River, May 2002. All photographs taken by Marshall Gannett, U.S. Geological Survey. Analysis of 1997–2008 Groundwater Level Changes in the Upper Deschutes Basin, Central Oregon By Marshall W. Gannett and Kenneth E. Lite, Jr. Prepared in cooperation with the Oregon Water Resources Department Scientific Investigations Report 2013–5092 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2013 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Whychus Creek
    w h y c h u s c r e e k : progress in restoration Acknowledgements prepared by: The Deschutes Partnership written and edited by: Upper Deschutes Watershed Council funded by: Bonneville Environmental Foundation Laird Norton Family Foundation Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board The information presented in this publication is based on the following technical reports available at www.RestoreTheDeschutes.org: 2012 Whychus Creek Monitoring Report 2011 Whychus Creek Monitoring Report Compiled and edited by the Upper Deschutes Watershed Council and Deschutes River Conservancy. The following entities provided information, data or support used in the development of this publication: Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Oregon Department of Water Resources Portland General Electric The Xerces Society U.S. Forest Service U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service The reintroduction of salmon and steelhead in Whychus Creek is led by Portland General Electric, the Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs and Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife. Please see www.DeschutesPassage.com for information. 2 whychus creek: progress in restoration Introduction I n the spring of 2007, the historic reintroduction of steelhead trout in Whychus Creek began with the release of 250,000 fry into the creek. These small fish, barely two inches in length, were the first steelhead trout to swim in Whychus Creek for more than 50 years since dams on the Deschutes River blocked the historic mi- grations. Two years later, in 2009, annual steelhead releases were complemented by the first reintroduction of chinook salmon fry and smolts. Hundreds of thousands of young fish representing both seagoing species have been released each year since, and will continue to be placed in Whychus Creek for years to come.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021.06.11 BBR Resort Map Ktk.Indd
    Fire Dept.non–emergency: 541-693-6911 | 911 | 541-693-6911 Dept.non–emergency: Fire . 13511 Hawks Beard, near Bishop’s Cap Cap Bishop’s near Beard, Hawks 13511 ROCK CLIMBING helicopters transport from the Sports Field. Field. Sports the from transport helicopters EXPLORE THE make up the Ranch. Ranch. the up make First Ascent Climbing o¡ers specialized climbing and has a fully-equipped fi rst aid room. Medical Medical room. aid rst fi fully-equipped a has and ums and various cabin clusters. About 1,200 homesites homesites 1,200 About clusters. cabin various and ums ADVENTURES services at Smith Rock State Park for all abilities. The BBR Fire Dept. is sta¡ ed with paramedics 24/7 24/7 paramedics with ed sta¡ is Dept. Fire BBR The Meadow (south). There also are three sets of condomini- of sets three are also There (south). Meadow BBR recommends helmets for all riders. all for helmets recommends BBR 1-866-climb11 | GoClimbing.com Home, South Meadow and Rock Ridge (center), and Glaze Glaze and (center), Ridge Rock and Meadow South Home, FIRST AID AID FIRST BACKYARD WITH OUTFITTERS when operating a bicycle, Razor, or inline skates. skates. inline or Razor, bicycle, a operating when into sections: Golf Home (NW), East Meadow (NE), Spring Spring (NE), Meadow East (NW), Home Golf sections: into BLACK BUTTE LOOKOUT • Anyone under 16 needs to wear a HELMET HELMET a wear to needs 16 under Anyone • for such a large residential resort. The Ranch is divided divided is Ranch The resort. residential large a such for FLY FISHING Police non–emergency: 541-693-6911 | 911 | 541-693-6911 non–emergency: Police Ranch Homeowners’ Association, a unique arrangement arrangement unique a Association, Homeowners’ Ranch Hike BBR’s namesake in this 3.6 mile, 1,556 foot climb.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Butte Ranch R.F.P.D
    BLACK BUTTE RANCH R.F.P.D. BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING September 28, 2017 Rodger Gabrielson called the meeting to order at 09:03 a.m. Board of Directors: Don Bowler Rodger Gabrielson Dave Gibson Tom Sawyer Larry Stuker Administration: Chief Dan Tucker Deputy Chief Dave Phillips Jamie Vohs APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion: Tom Sawyer moved to approve the July 27, 2017 meeting minutes as presented, seconded by Don Bowler, unanimously passed. REPORTS Treasurer Report Larry briefly went through the treasurer reports and inquired on the following line items: uniforms, professional & legal, training and ambulance revenue. Motion: Don Bowler moved to accept the July & August 2017 financial reports as presented, seconded by Larry Stuker, unanimously passed. Chief’s Report – Chief Tucker Fire and Ambulance Report – Chief Tucker The fire and ambulance report will be changing a bit. The current process is lengthy and Chief Tucker hopes to be able to use Intterra more frequently in the future as it will be offering more options. Intterra was a great resource during the fires. There were less medical calls during the times of the fires. It is believed people were more alert and aware of the busyness of the fire department. Chief Tucker discussed: The department was well prepared for the eclipse. Sisters did not see the amount of people that were projected. With that said, it is believed that Black Butte Ranch saw more people than projected. Madras area saw what was expected. D/C Phillips was at the MACC (Multi-Agency Coordination Center) the week of the eclipse and he felt it served the Tri-County area very well.
    [Show full text]
  • Whychus Creek Restoration Project at Camp Polk Meadow Preserve
    Whychus Creek Restoration Project at Camp Polk Meadow Preserve June 29, 2007 A collaborative project of the: Upper Deschutes Watershed Council Deschutes Basin Land Trust Deschutes National Forest Project design funding provided by the Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board, Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation, Deschutes River Conservancy and The Nature Conservancy. Technical design prepared for the Upper Deschutes Watershed Council by the Deschutes National Forest under Collection Agreement No. 06-CO-11060120-011. Please direct project inquiries to Ryan Houston, Upper Deschutes Watershed Council, www.RestoreTheDeschutes.org TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................2 Background .......................................................................................................2 Development and Planning ...............................................................................4 Project Goal and Objectives..............................................................................6 Alternatives .......................................................................................................7 PROJECT ANALYSIS..........................................................................................9 Previous Assessments ......................................................................................9 Project Team Assessment
    [Show full text]