Examining the History of Forest and Fire Management: a Deeper Look at How the Milli Fire Affected the Sisters Oregon Community

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Examining the History of Forest and Fire Management: a Deeper Look at How the Milli Fire Affected the Sisters Oregon Community Western Oregon University Digital Commons@WOU Honors Senior Theses/Projects Student Scholarship Spring 2020 Examining the History of Forest and Fire Management: A deeper look at how the Milli fire affected the Sisters Oregon community Morgan Williams Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wou.edu/honors_theses Running Heading: FIRE MANAGEMENT Examining the History of Forest and Fire Management A deeper look at how the Milli fire effected the Sisters Oregon community By Morgan Williams An Honors Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for Graduation from the Western Oregon University Honors Program Mark VanSteeter, Thesis Advisor Dr. Gavin Keulks, Honors Program Director June 2020 FIRE MANAGEMENT 2 Acknowledgements I want to thank my advisors, Gavin and Mark, for putting up with all my procrastination, questions, and late-night emails. I could not have done this without both of you supporting and encouraging me. My parents, who bore with me through all my breakdowns and helped, put me back together with love and support as well as some research help! My awesome house mom MacKenzie, who helped read over all my research and provide smart sounding words to use! All my roommates and friends, who have listened to me talk, complain about and procrastinate this project; I could not have finished this without any of you. Thank you for being on my team and a part of my life. I’m so grateful for you all! FIRE MANAGEMENT 3 Table of Contents Abstract……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….5 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………………………6 Literature Review: Forest Management Prescribed Burning………………………………..8 Forest Fire History Around the World and the USA……………………………………………21 Oregon Forest Fire History…………………………………………………………………………………29 How Forest Fires are Fought………………………………………………………………………………34 Sisters Oregon History……………………………………………………………………………………….40 Milli Fire…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….44 How Firefighters Lived While Fighting the Milli Fire…………………………………………..55 Economic Effects on a Community…………………………………………………………………….57 Prevention…………………………………………………………………………………………………………61 What to do When There is a Forest Fire…………………………………………………………….65 Summary…………………………………………………………………………………………………………..67 Appendix (Transcribed Interviews)……………………………………………………………………69 Interview with Brad from Sisters Folk Fest……………………………………………..69 Interview with James from the Forest Service………………………………………..88 Interview with Jeri from the Sister City Chamber of Commerce…………….122 Interview with Jinny a Fire Prevention Education Specialist………………….129 Interview with Nate a Wildland Fire Fighter………………………………………….158 Interview with Roger the Sisters Fire Station Chief……………………………….178 References………………………………………………………………………………………………………207 FIRE MANAGEMENT 4 Abstract Forest management is an ever-changing process. With new research and technology, forest management has dramatically changed over the last few decades. In 1995, 16% of the US Forest Service’s budget was devoted to firefighting, in 2015 it was more than 50% of the budget, and estimates say that it could be as much as 70% of the budget by the year 2025 (Struzik, 238). This raise in cost is due in part to the lengthening of wildfire season. Over the last 40 years, the average fire season in the US has gone from 23 days long to an average of 116 days (Davis, p. 92). This compilation will review important literature related to forest management, explore fire management based on differing geological areas, assess how forest fires impact communities using the 2017 Milli Fire as an example, and interview professionals in the field of forest and fire management all in hopes to bring awareness, prevention, and increased social responsibility to readers. FIRE MANAGEMENT 5 Introduction Wildfire has been a natural part of the world’s ecosystem long before humans had the ability or desire to do anything about them. Globally an area the size of New Zealand burns each year, this is about 1% of the world's forest that burns every year (Spilsbury, 2018, p. 5). Over the last few hundred years, human involvement in forest and fire management has dramatically changed the course of wildfires. Over the last 40 years, the average fire season in the US has gone from 23 days long to an average of 116 days (Davis, 2019, p. 92). This in combination with increased population, expansion of dwellings into forested areas, and climate instability has led to a new kind of wildfire that is bigger and more destructive than previous years' wildfires. A Megafire is a fire that burns at least 100,000 acres and over the last three decades, the number of Megafires that occurs each year has been on the rise (TEDx Talks, 2017). This change over time can be attributed to a combination of warmer and dryer climate contributing to less precipitation and enabling more frequent, bigger, and hotter forest fires to occur (Davis, 2019, p. 91-92). Another reason for this new kind of fire is due to the urban-wildland interface or WUI (Struzik, 2017, P. 3). With a growing population, new homes are being built in places prone to wildfire creating more kindling for a fire when one does occur. In the US about 9% of land area is considered to be WUI with around FIRE MANAGEMENT 6 39% of all US housing units are in this fire-prone area (Radeloff et al., 2005). This means that when a wildfire happens in these areas it's even more important for it to be dealt with quickly to protect the people and homes that are there. This has led to a rising cost of forest and fire management. In 1995 16% of the US Forest Service’s budget was devoted to firefighting, in 2015 it was more than 50% of the budget, and estimates say that it could be as much as 70% of the budget by the year 2025 (Struzik, 2017, p. 238). This compilation will review important literature related to forest management, explore fire management based on differing ecological areas, assess how forest fires impact communities using the 2017 Milli Fire as an example, and interview professionals in the field of forest and fire management all in hopes to bring awareness, prevention, and increased social responsibility to readers. FIRE MANAGEMENT 7 Literature Review: Forest Management Prescribed Burning Prescribed burns and forest management are critical aspects of forest health and preservation. Recent research has shown this to be true. An overall theme from some of the research shows how forests have been managed over the past 100 years. In this timeframe, fire management strategy was focused on instantly extinguishing any fires. It can be seen now that this strategy has led to a massive build-up of fuels, creating the potential for larger forest fires later. Over the last 15 years, large wildfires seem more rampant due to poor management years before. The following section will provide an overview of what research literature has shown in the field of forest maintenance in a variety of different areas of the world. Research surveyed forests in the United States, Australia, Spain, Texas, Canada, and a variety of other places. An article from the Journal of Environmental Management, “The role of prescribed burn associations in the application of prescribed fires in rangeland ecosystems,” surveyed people’s perceptions and attitudes toward fire management and how changing that could impact prescribed fire strategies being implemented (Toledo, et al., 2013). This study was conducted by a team of researchers out of the Department of Ecosystem Science and Management at Texas A&M University, the Department of Forest Resources and Environmental Conservation at Virginia Tech, and Sonora AgriLife Research Station also at Texas FIRE MANAGEMENT 8 A&M University. The study was conducted in 12 counties in Texas, made up of groups of four counties in each of three ecoregions, areas with grasslands, savannahs, and those impacted by brush encroachment. A self-administered questionnaire was mailed to 1187 landowners to collect data about landowner attitudes and perceptions toward the use of prescribed fire as a management and restoration tool. Mainly a 7 point Likert-type scale was used in which participants were asked to convey agreement or disagreement with statements about prescribed fire. “Perception of the risk of using fire relative to that of using other woody plant management options, perceived constraints of applying fire including lack of skill, labor, knowledge and equipment, and whether or not they are a member of a PBA (Prescribed Burn Association)” (Toledo, et al., 2013). They found that the reintroduction of fire is essential to restore degraded grassland and savanna ecosystems and to reduce fuel load build-up. The challenge to carrying this out is the perception from landowners to intentionally ignite fires on their land. When they do this, landowners are taking the risk of starting a fire without professional advice. They found that human-influenced changes of fire systems have significantly contributed to “brush encroachment and degradation of many grasslands and savannas” (Toledo, et al., 2013). They emphasize that Prescribed Burn Associations could reduce risk perceptions regarding the use of FIRE MANAGEMENT 9 prescribed fire and their importance for restoring brush-encroached grasslands and savannas. Secondly, a team of researchers published an article titled, “Wildfire fuel management: network-based models and optimization of prescribed burning” (Matsypura, et al., 2018). The study was conducted out of the University of Sydney, University of Pittsburgh, and the
Recommended publications
  • Ten Years After the Biscuit Fire: Evaluating Vegetation Succession and Post- Fire Management Effects
    Project Title: Ten years after the Biscuit Fire: Evaluating vegetation succession and post- fire management effects Final Report: JFSP 11-1-1-4 Date of Final Report: 29 June 2015 Principle Investigator: Dr. Daniel C. Donato Washington State Department of Natural Resources 1111 Washington St SE, Box 47014 Olympia, WA 98504-7014 and University of Washington School of Environmental & Forest Sciences Seattle, WA 98195 360-902-1753 [email protected] Co-Principle Investigators: Dr. John L. Campbell Oregon State University Department of Forest Ecosystems & Society 321 Richardson Hall Corvallis, OR 97331 [email protected] Dr. Joseph B. Fontaine Murdoch University School of Veterinary and Life Sciences 90 South St. Perth, WA 6150, Australia [email protected] This research was supported in part by the Joint Fire Sciences Program. For further information go to www.firescience.gov Abstract Increases in the area of high-severity wildfire in the western U.S. have prompted widespread management concerns about post-fire forest succession and fuels. Key questions include the degree to which, and over what time frame: a) forests will regenerate back toward mature forest cover, and b) fire hazard increases due to the falling and decay of fire-killed trees, with and without post-fire (or ‘salvage’) logging. While a number of recent studies have begun to address these questions using chronosequences and model projections, we had the unique opportunity to track regeneration and fuel dynamics over a decade of post-fire succession by re-visiting our network of sample plots distributed in the 2002 Biscuit Fire in southwest Oregon.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Management.Indd
    Fire today ManagementVolume 65 • No. 2 • Spring 2005 LLARGEARGE FFIRESIRES OFOF 2002—P2002—PARTART 22 United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Erratum In Fire Management Today volume 64(4), the article "A New Tool for Mopup and Other Fire Management Tasks" by Bill Gray shows incorrect telephone and fax numbers on page 47. The correct numbers are 210-614-4080 (tel.) and 210-614-0347 (fax). Fire Management Today is published by the Forest Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC. The Secretary of Agriculture has determined that the publication of this periodical is necessary in the transaction of the pub- lic business required by law of this Department. Fire Management Today is for sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, at: Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: 202-512-1800 Fax: 202-512-2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402-0001 Fire Management Today is available on the World Wide Web at http://www.fs.fed.us/fire/fmt/index.html Mike Johanns, Secretary Melissa Frey U.S. Department of Agriculture General Manager Dale Bosworth, Chief Robert H. “Hutch” Brown, Ph.D. Forest Service Managing Editor Tom Harbour, Director Madelyn Dillon Fire and Aviation Management Editor Delvin R. Bunton Issue Coordinator The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communica- tion of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720- 2600 (voice and TDD).
    [Show full text]
  • Amended Complaint
    11/2/2020 9:55 AM 20CV33885 1 2 3 4 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON 5 FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH 6 JEANYNE JAMES, ROBIN COLBERT, Case No. 20cv33885 WENDELL CARPENTER, JANE 7 DREVO, SAM DREVO, BROOKE AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT EDGE AND BILL EDGE, SR., LORI 8 FOWLER, IRIS HAMPTON, JAMES CLAIMS NOT SUBJECT TO MANDATORY HOLLAND, RACHELLE MCMASTER, ARBITRATION 9 KRISTINA MONTOYA, NORTHWEST RIVER GUIDES, LLC, JEREMY SIGEL, AMOUNT SOUGHT: OVER $600,000,000 10 SHARIENE STOCKTON AND KEVIN STOCKTON, individually and on behalf Filing Fee: $1,178 under ORS 21.160(1)(e) 11 of all others similarly situated, JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. 14 PACIFICORP, an Oregon corporation; and PACIFIC POWER, an Oregon 15 registered electric utility and assumed business name of PACIFICORP, 16 Defendants. 17 INTRODUCTION 18 1. 19 Plaintiffs Jeanyne James, Robin Colbert, Wendell Carpenter, Jane Drevo, Sam Drevo, 20 Brooke Edge and Bill Edge, Sr., Lori Fowler, Iris Hampton, James Holland, Rachelle McMaster, 21 Kristina Montoya, Northwest River Guides, LLC, Jeremy Sigel, and Shariene Stockton and Kevin 22 Stockton individually and on behalf of a class of all those similarly, allege the following against 23 PacifiCorp and Pacific Power (hereafter “Defendants” or collectively “Pacific Power”), based, 24 where applicable, on personal knowledge, information and belief, and the investigation and 25 research of counsel. On September 30, 2020, Plaintiffs provided notice and demand to Defendants 26 for damages, and Defendants have not met that demand in the 30-day period specified by ORCP {SSBLS Main Documents/8865/001/00635230-1 } Page 1 – AMENDED COMPLAINT STOLL STOLL BERNE LOKTING & SHLACHTER P.C.
    [Show full text]
  • 5Th International Fire Behavior and Fuels Conference Portland, Oregon
    5th International Fire Behavior and Fuels Conference Portland, Oregon April 11-14, 2016 Oral Presentation Abstracts 1. Is It Time To Say Goodbye to Fire Rotations? Cecil Frost, Landscape Fire Ecologist, University of North Carolina Abstract: The idea of fire rotations goes back to widespread dawning, in the 1960s, of the realization that we had to get fire back into the woods. This was a part of a ponderous midstream turnaround that began with a few small voices such as H.H. Chapman, speaking against the unresistable tide of fire suppression of the early 20th century. Movement in the new direction toward restoration of fire gained way with early publications in the Proceedings of the Tall Timbers Fire Ecology Conferences from 1960- 1966. The idea of fire rotations at its simplest was to take a natural area, say a 500,000 acre national forest, and if you had the resources to burn 5000 acres a year, start in one place, burn the next 5000 acres the next year and so on until you had reached the beginning. 500,000/5000 = 100 years to complete one rotation. This, we now can see, is a long term recipe for disaster. What we see from the most recent iterations of LANDFIRE—from Florida, through the central grasslands to the Palouse prairie of eastern Oregon and Washington—is that most of the U.S. was a non-seral landscape, naturally stabilized by frequent fire—the more frequent, the more stable. Within this fire system, recent maps show that local fire frequency at fine scales was far more complex than previously perceived.
    [Show full text]
  • National Interagency Mobilization Guide
    NATIONAL INTERAGENCY MOBILIZATION GUIDE Geographic Areas March 2019 NFES 2092 Produced annually by the National Interagency Coordination Center, located at the National Interagency Fire Center, Boise, Idaho. __________________________________________________________________ Additional copies of this publication may be ordered from: National Interagency Fire Center, Great Basin Cache Supply Office, 3833 S, Development Avenue, Boise, Idaho 83705. Order: NFES #2092. This publication is also available on the Internet at www.nifc.gov/news/nicc.html This page intentionally left blank. NATIONAL INTERAGENCY FIRE CENTER 3833 South Development Avenue Boise, Idaho 83705 TO: Agency Personnel FROM: NIFC-Multi-Agency Coordinating Group DATE: March 1, 2019 SUBJECT: 2019 National Interagency Mobilization Guide Attached is the 2019 National Interagency Mobilization Guide. This Guide is written to reflect the interagency needs of the user and formatted to accept local inserts. The signatory agencies have directed the National Interagency Coordination Center (NICC) with review and oversite from the National Multi-agency Coordinating Group (NMAC) to annually revise, publish, and distribute the National Interagency Mobilization Guide by March 1, and issue errata to this document. The National Interagency Mobilization Guide establishes the standards for mobilization and demobilization of resources in response to wildland fire and all-hazard events. It is the foundational document instituting overarching processes for total mobility of resources. Suggestions for modification of the publication should be sent through your Coordination Center Manager (the NICC and the GACCs) and they will bring forward change requests that have been vetted through recognized interagency groups within their respective areas. The NICC will accept change requests from recognized interagency groups (CGAC, ACIC, etc.), NWCG Committees and sub-committees, and functional areas (NIRSC, RAWS, Contracting, etc.), as well as signatory agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Area Interagency Mobilization Guide 2021
    Eastern Area Interagency Mobilization Guide 2021 CHAPTER 10 OBJECTIVES, POLICY AND SCOPE OF OPERATION *** This page intentionally left blank *** Objectives, Policy, And Scope Of Operation Chapter 10 CHAPTER 10 - OBJECTIVES, POLICY AND SCOPE OF OPERATION MISSION STATEMENT - EASTERN AREA COORDINATION CENTER The Eastern Area coordination center (EACC), located in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, is the Geographic Area Coordination Center (GACC) for the 20 northeastern states, Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), National Park Service (NPS), Forest Service (FS), Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), and other cooperating agencies. The principal mission of the Eastern Area Coordination Center is the cost effective and timely coordination of land management agency successful emergency response for wildland fire. As a partner in the National Response Framework (NRF) and as interagency cooperators, we will also meet the requirements of all-hazard incidents as directed by the NRF or Presidential and Secretarial direction. This is accomplished through planning, situation monitoring, and expediting resource orders between the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) Areas, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), States, the National Association of State Foresters (NASF), Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) Regions, Forest Service (FS) Regions, National Park Service (NPS)Regions, National Weather Service (NWS) Regions, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Regions through the United States Fire Administration (USFA) and other cooperating agencies. The Eastern Area Interagency Mobilization Guide (EMG) supplements the National Interagency Mobilization Guide (NMG) and identifies standard Eastern Area procedures which guide the operations of multi-agency logistical support activity throughout the coordination system. This guide is intended to facilitate interagency dispatch coordination, ensuring the timeliest and cost-effective incident support services available are provided.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Mass Action Cases
    1 Derek C. Johnson, OSB No. 882340 [email protected] 2 Marilyn A. Heiken, OSB No. 923308 [email protected] 3 Leslie W. O’Leary, OSB No. 990908 4 [email protected] JOHNSON JOHNSON LUCAS & MIDDLETON, P.C. 5 975 Oak Street, Suite 1050 Eugene, OR 97401-3124 6 Tel: (541) 484-2434 Fax: (541) 484-0882 7 8 Of Attorneys for Plaintiffs 9 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OR OREGON 10 FOR THE COUNTY OF MARION 11 SHYLA ZEOBER, JAYCE DELHOYO, Case No.: KAIDEN DELHOYO, CARL WILLSON, 12 JAMES WILLSON, JOHNNY WHEELER, COMPLAINT GRACE WELLMAN, JASON WELLMAN, 13 (Negligence; Nuisance; Trespass) TERRY WELLMAN, HEATHER 14 WEAVER, RYAN WEAVER, JAMES Prayer: $750,000,000 VAUGHN, ALEXIS WILLIAMS, 15 SAMANTHA WILLIAMS, RICKEY Fee Authority: ORS 21.160(e) THOMAS, UTE THOMAS, TRINA 16 THOMAS, CALEB STEEPLES, SHALYNN JURY TRIAL REQUESTED HICKS, ALEXANDER CALDWELL 17 CLAIM NOT SUBJECT TO MANDATORY MOTLEY, SOPHIA CALDWELL ARBITRATION 18 MOTLEY, DONALD TESDAL, MICHELE TESDAL, EVON TESDAL, LAUREN 19 TESDAL, SAM TESDAL, THOMAS TESDAL, MICHAEL SULLIVAN, 20 DEANNA SULLIVAN, TREVIN CONNER, 21 AIDEN SULLIVAN, HEATHER ADAIR SULLIVAN, THOMAS STROSCHINE, 22 DARYL STROSCHINE, GRANT SPEER, MARCUS SPEARS, DOUG GIBSON, 23 STEPHEN SMITHER, CAROLE SMITHER, MIRANDA SMITH, ROBERT 24 SHELLABARGER JR., AYDEN 25 COFFMAN, ROXANNA SCHROEDER, FREDRICK SCHROEDER, SCOT 26 ROONEY, MISTI ROONEY, LYLE ROGERS JR., WAYNE REPOSA, LINDA 27 REPOSA, GARY RAMAGE, JOANN ROBINSON, and SADIE ROBINSON, 28 Page 1 - COMPLAINT 1 Plaintiffs, 2 v. 3 PACIFICORP, an Oregon Corporation,
    [Show full text]
  • Crews Chapter 30
    Crews Chapter 30 1 Chapter 30 -CREWS 2 3 California Conservation Corps (CCC) 4 CCC Support and Type 2 crews are available for assignments nationwide. Support crews can be 5 utilized for a wide variety of incident support activities not requiring direct supervision such as traffic 6 control, runners, equipment set-up, waste management, etc. 7 8 CCC Type 2 crews are fully equipped and the crew supervisors are federally qualified Crew Bosses. 9 CCC Type 2 crews will be available through their local Unit or through the CCC Duty Officer. 10 CCC has a centralized dispatch system for crews. All calls for crew assistance go directly to the 11 CCC Duty Officer. The CCC Duty Officer will secure the closest available crew(s) for the 12 assignment. 13 14 CCC Type 1 crews are CAL FIRE Type 1 crews and should be ordered as CAL FIRE Type 1 crews 15 (Page 59, CAL FIRE/Type 1). If there is a need to specifically order A CAL FIRE Type 1 crew with 16 CCC crew personnel, document in special needs 17 18 Unit and/or GACC: 19 Contact CCC Duty Officer 24 hour contact number at 916-599-1415 and leave a message. If no 20 answer within 2 hours, call CCC Emergency Manager at 916-341-3103 or 916-764-9922 21 (cell). If no answer within 2 hours, call CCC Operations Chief at 530-945-1651(cell). 22 For CCC Support crews, order in the current ordering system of record as: 23 Crew, Camp. 24 For CCC Type 2 crews, order in the current ordering system of record as: 25 Crew, Type 2.
    [Show full text]
  • NFIRS 5.0 Self-Study Program: Wildland Fire Module: NFIRS-8
    NFIRS 5.0 Self-Study Program Wildland Fire Module: NFIRS-8 Objectives After completing the Wildland Fire Module the student will be able to: 1. Describe when the Wildland Fire Module is to be used. 2. Demonstrate how to complete the Wildland Fire Module and identify appropriate other modules, given the scenario of a hypothetical incident. 8-1 Table of Contents Pretest #8 – Wildland Fire Module. 8-3 Wildland Fire Module Use. .8-4 Section A: FDID, State, Incident Date, Station, Incident Number, Exposure. 8-5 Section B: Alternate Location Specification . 8-6 Section C: Area Type . 8-6 Section D: Wildland Fire Cause, Human and Other Factors Contributing To Ignition, and Fire Suppression Factors. .8-6 Section E: Heat Source. .8-8 Section F: Mobile Property Type. .8-8 Section G: Equipment Involved in Ignition . 8-8 Section H: Weather Information. .8-9 Section I: Number of Buildings Ignited, Number of Buildings Threatened, Total Acres Burned, and Primary Crops Burned. 8-11 Section J: Property Management. 8-12 Section K: NFDRS Fuel Model at Origin. 8-13 Section L: Person Responsible For Fire, Gender of Person Involved, Age or Date of Birth, and Activity of Person Involved . .8-13 Section M: Type of Right-of-Way . .8-14 Section N: Fire Behavior. 8-15 Summary. 8-16 EXAMPLE: Grass and Brush Fire. 8-17 EXERCISE SCENARIO 8-1: Brush Fire Incident . 8-19 EXERCISE SCENARIO 8-2: Vehicle Fire on I-95. 8-22 NFIRS 5.0 Self-Study Program Pretest #8 – Wildland Fire Module 1. A Basic Module must be completed if the Wildland Fire Module is completed.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 Annual Fire Report
    Northwest Annual Fire Report 2012 Northwest Interagency Coordination Center Predictive Services Unit - Intelligence Section Available on www.nwccweb.us Published April 22, 2013 SUMMARY INFORMATION | NWCC Mission Table of Contents SUMMARY INFORMATION .......................................................................................... 2 NWCC Mission....................................................................................................................2 NWCC Annual Fire Report ...................................................................................................3 Table 1: Agency Identifier Legend ......................................................................................................... 3 2012 Northwest Fire Season Summary ................................................................................4 Chart 1: NW 2012 Reported Acres Burned vs. 10-Year Average ....................................................... 4 Chart 2: 2012 NW Preparedness Levels ............................................................................................ 4 FIRE MAPS & STATISTICS ............................................................................................. 5 Table 2: NW 2012 Large Fires List ........................................................................................5 Table 3: NW 2012 Fires List: Confine/Monitor/Point Zone Protection ..................................6 NW 2012 Large Fire Location Maps .....................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Fire Logging Summary of Key Studies and Findings
    POST-FIRE LOGGING SUMMARY OF KEY STUDIES AND FINDINGS Prepared by Dominick A. DellaSala, Ph.D. Forest Ecologist and Director World Wildlife Fund February 2006 @K. Schaffer EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Recent congressional hearings and interest in the science of post-fire logging have prompted this summary on the current level of scientific knowledge regarding post- disturbance regeneration and management. In general traditional forestry has viewed fire as bad and dead trees as a waste. These views have skewed public policies about post-fire logging. However, current scientific understanding recognizes that disturbance and dead trees are in fact critical to forest health. Of the approximately thirty scientific papers on post-fire logging and additional government reports published to date, not a single one indicates that logging provides benefits to ecosystems regenerating post-disturbance. In general, post-fire logging impedes regeneration when it compacts soils, removes “biological legacies” (e.g., large dead standing and downed trees), introduces or spreads invasive species, causes soil erosion when logs are dragged across steep slopes, and delivers sediment to streams from logging roads. Further, a large body of science on disturbance ecology (e.g., recent books on Mt. St Helens and studies in the Yellowstone Ecosystem and elsewhere) indicate that when natural disturbance events are preceded and/or followed by land management activities they often impair the recovery of forest ecosystems. Notably, post-fire logging in 2005 represented a substantial amount of the 1 timber volume sold on Forest Service lands nation-wide (~40% of total volume sold) as well as the Pacific Northwest (~50%) (USFS Washington Office, timber volume spread sheets - Timber Management Staff).
    [Show full text]
  • Synthesis of Knowledge on the Effects of Fire and Fire Surrogates on Wildlife in U.S
    Archival copy. For current version, see: https://catalog.extension.oregonstate.edu/sr1096 Synthesis of Knowledge on the Effects Synthesis of Knowledge on the Effects of Fire and Fire Surrogates on Wildlife in U.S. Dry Forests (SR 1096)—Oregon State University State 1096)—Oregon (SR Forests Dry U.S. in Wildlife on Surrogates Fire and Fire of Effects the on Knowledge of Synthesis of Fire and Fire Surrogates on Wildlife in U.S. Dry Forests Patricia L. Kennedy and Joseph B. Fontaine Special Report 1096 Archival copy. For current version, see: https://catalog.extension.oregonstate.edu/sr1096 Synthesis of Knowledge on the Effects of Fire and Fire Surrogates on Wildlife in U.S. Dry Forests Patricia L. Kennedy Professor Eastern Oregon Agricultural Research Center Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Oregon State University Union, Oregon Joseph B. Fontaine Postdoctoral Researcher School of Environmental Science Murdoch University Perth, Australia Previously: Postdoctoral Researcher Eastern Oregon Agricultural Research Center Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Oregon State University Union, Oregon Special Report 1096 September 2009 Archival copy. For current version, see: https://catalog.extension.oregonstate.edu/sr1096 Synthesis of Knowledge on the Effects of Fire and Fire Surrogates on Wildlife in U.S. Dry Forests Special Report 1096 September 2009 Extension and Experiment Station Communications Oregon State University 422 Kerr Administration Building Corvallis, OR 97331 http://extension.oregonstate.edu/ © 2009 by Oregon State University. This publication may be photocopied or reprinted in its entirety for noncommercial purposes. This publication was produced and distributed in furtherance of the Acts of Congress of May 8 and June 30, 1914.
    [Show full text]