DOCSLIB.ORG

Framing Feminisms : Feminist Critiques of Patriarchal News Media

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Framing Feminisms : Feminist Critiques of Patriarchal News Media FRAMING FEMINISMS: FEMINIST CRITIQUES OF PATRIARCHAL NEWS MEDIA Suzanne Monique Strutt B.A., Simon Fraser University, 1987 THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in the School of Communication a Suzanne Monique Strutt 1994 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY May 1994 All rights reserved. This work may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without permission of the author. APPROVAL Name: Suzanne Monique Strutt Degree: Master of Arts (Communication) Title of thesis: Framing feminisms: feminist critiques of patriarchal news media Examining Committee: Chair: Dr. Martin Laba ~r..Robert A. Hackett Associate Professor Senior Supervisor Dr. Alison Beale Assistant Professor Dr. Stephen Kline Professor DC D%% H. Currie Associate Professor of Sociology Department of Anthropology and Sociology The University of British Columbia External Examiner PARTIAL COPYRIGHT LICENSE I hereby grant to Simon Fraser University the right to lend my thesis, project or extended essay (the title of which is shown below) to users of the Simon Fraser University Library, and to make partial or single copies only for such users or in response to a request from the library of any other university, or other educational institution, on its own behalf or for one of its users. I further agree that permission for multiple copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by me or the Dean of Graduate Studies. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Title of Thesis/ProjectlExtended Essay FRAMING FEMINISMS: FEMINIST CRITIQUES OF PATRIARCHAL NEWS Author: signature Suzanne M. Strutt name ABSTRACT The thesis evaluates feminist media critiques in terms of their capacity for promoting sufficient systemic change to correct the patriarchal optic of hegemonic media institutions. It analyses how media interpret and frame feminisms and it probes the evolution of a feminist critique committed to producing a paradigm shift in news - .-" production. Media critique traditions are reviewed primarily within the context of feminist interventions with the Canadian state. The development of these critiques is explored by extracting contributions from three theoretical frameworks. The thesis examines, in a first instance, feminist theory and its various conceptualizations of gender which have influenced political strategies. Secondly, features of the Gramscian hegemony theory are considered, particularly as they acknowledge the agency of social movements in the negotiation of both hegemony and oppositional practices, as well as the role of news media in the process of ideological hegemony. Finally, feminist contributions to communication theory are reviewed. Subsequent to the identification of the theoretical constitution of a feminist media critique, the thesis correlates the evolution of this critique with analogous cycles in feminist epistemologies. It proposes that the direction of feminist analysis and advocacy related to the 'women and the media' question corresponds to initial stages in the feminist critique of traditional epistemology and could therefore be informed by the trajectory of this arguably more mature critique. The thesis identifies within a feminist media critique, the tension between traditional empiricist values of dualisms and of objectivity and more critical analyses located in the social construction of knowledge. It points to the value of current liberal feminist interventions but sees their influence as confined within a transitional stage of deconstruction of sexist practices in media industries. It suggests that liberal feminism must experience fully its inherent contradictions before it can assist the feminist project of paradigm replacement. The thesis argues that to achieve a paradigm shift in the news discourse, feminist interventions should proceed to the second stage of reconstruction, and mobilize for the infusion in media industries of a critical mass of female journalists articulating feminist politics. DEDICATION To Michael, Oliver and the memory of our son and brother, Nathan. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank the members of my supervisory committee, Bob Hackett, Alison Beale and Steve Kline, for their compassion, intellectual support and critical feedback. I sincerely appreciate the guidance, insights and confidence of Alison who supervised my work until her extended research leave in Australia. I am grateful to Bob for so readily and enthusiastically taking over the supervision of my thesis at that time. 1 thank also Martin Laba for his encouragement and understanding when I confronted particularly difficult personal circumstances. I am grateful to supportive and caring friends and colleagues inside and outside the School of Communication. I am particularly indebted to the members of my reading group - Dorothy Kidd, Nick Witheford and Eleanor 07Donnell,and to the many members of Mediawatch whose theoretical insights, political commitment, and dedication to the feminist project inspired me throughout my own involvement in the organization and beyond. I would like to acknowledge the assistance of Lucie Menkveld and Neena Shahani as well as the financial support of the SFU Senate Graduate Awards Committee, CanWest and Cable Television Pioneer. TABLE OF CONTENTS .. APPROVAL .............................................................................. ii ... ABSTRACT .............................................................................. 111 DEDICATION ............................................................................ v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................. vi INTRODUCTION ................................................................... 1 CHAPTER 1 THE WOMEN'S MOVEMENT. FEMINIST POLITICS AND THEORIES Introduction ............................................................................ -6 Feminism and Politics ............................................................... -6 First Wave of the Women's Movement ................................... 7 Second Wave of the Women's Movement ............................... -8 Feminist Politics and Theory ........................................................ 15 Liberal Feminism ............................................................ -16 Radical Feminism ............................................................. 19 Socialist Feminism ...........................................................-22 Feminist Theory and Ideology ....................................................... 23 Sex and Gender ..............................................................-26 Gender Equality .. Gender Difference .................................... -28 Beyond Gender .. Beyond Women? ........................................ 31 Conclusion ............................................................................. -34 CHAPTER 2 SOCIAL MOVEMENT THEORIES. OPPOSITIONAL PRACTICES AND THE Introduction ............................................................................ -36 Theoretical traditions of contemporary social movement analyses ............ -36 Reflections on theoretical approaches and their limitations ...................... 38 vii Resource-Mobilization Theory ..............................................38 New Social Movement Theory ............................................. -41 Hegemonylcounter-hegemony ............................................. -47 The role of media in ideological hegemony ...................................... 53 The news paradigm .......................................................... -54 Media .. movement dialectic ............................................... -58 Feminism-Media Dimensions ........................................................61 The Concept of Patriarchy ................................................... 61 Patriarchal Ideology .......................................................... 64 Patriarchal Media ............................................................. 66 Conclusion .............................................................................. 67 CHAPTER 3 MEDIA FRAMES OF FEMINISMS AND FEMINIST MEDIA CRITIQUES Introduction............................................................................ -69 From empiricism to ideology .. the shift in feminist media critique ........... 70 Regulating gender equity ....................................................71 Legislating gender equity .................................................... 79 Feminist responses to legislation and regulation .........................80 Research and activism within gender communication frameworks ....82 From 'symbolic alienation' to 'frames' ...........................................-86 Some implications of news frames on the feminist movement ........ -87 Framing devices .a case study ........................................... 90 Conclusion .............................................................................-96 CHAPTER 4 TOWARDS A NEW PARADIGM? Introduction ............................................................................ -99 The critique of conventional epistemology ......................................... 100 Feminist epistemological approaches ............................................... 102 ... Vlll Feminist empiricism .......................................................... 102 Feminist standpoint .......................................................... -105 Postmodern tendencies
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Feminist Epistemological Framework: Preventing Knowledge Distortions in Scientific Inquiry
    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont Scripps Senior Theses Scripps Student Scholarship 2019 A Feminist Epistemological Framework: Preventing Knowledge Distortions in Scientific Inquiry Karina Bucciarelli Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.claremont.edu/scripps_theses Part of the Epistemology Commons, Feminist Philosophy Commons, and the Philosophy of Science Commons Recommended Citation Bucciarelli, Karina, "A Feminist Epistemological Framework: Preventing Knowledge Distortions in Scientific Inquiry" (2019). Scripps Senior Theses. 1365. https://scholarship.claremont.edu/scripps_theses/1365 This Open Access Senior Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Scripps Student Scholarship at Scholarship @ Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scripps Senior Theses by an authorized administrator of Scholarship @ Claremont. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A FEMINIST EPISTEMOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK: PREVENTING KNOWLEDGE DISTORTIONS IN SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY by KARINA MARTINS BUCCIARELLI SUBMITTED TO SCRIPPS COLLEGE IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE DEGREE OF BACHELOR OF ARTS PROFESSOR SUSAN CASTAGNETTO PROFESSOR RIMA BASU APRIL 26, 2019 Bucciarelli 2 Acknowledgements First off, I would like to thank my wonderful family for supporting me every step of the way. Mamãe e Papai, obrigada pelo amor e carinho, mil telefonemas, conversas e risadas. Obrigada por não só proporcionar essa educação incrível, mas também me dar um exemplo de como viver. Rafa, thanks for the jokes, the editing help and the spontaneous phone calls. Bela, thank you for the endless time you give to me, for your patience and for your support (even through WhatsApp audios). To my dear friends, thank you for the late study nights, the wild dance parties, the laughs and the endless support.
    [Show full text]
  • Objectivity in the Feminist Philosophy of Science
    OBJECTIVITY IN THE FEMINIST PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requisites for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Karen Cordrick Haely, M.A. ***** The Ohio State University 2003 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor Louise M. Antony, Adviser Professor Donald C. Hubin _______________________ Professor George Pappas Adviser Philosophy Graduate Program ABSTRACT According to a familiar though naïve conception, science is a rigorously neutral enterprise, free from social and cultural influence, but more sophisticated philosophical views about science have revealed that cultural and personal interests and values are ubiquitous in scientific practice, and thus ought not be ignored when attempting to understand, describe and prescribe proper behavior for the practice of science. Indeed, many theorists have argued that cultural and personal interests and values must be present in science (and knowledge gathering in general) in order to make sense of the world. The concept of objectivity has been utilized in the philosophy of science (as well as in epistemology) as a way to discuss and explore the various types of social and cultural influence that operate in science. The concept has also served as the focus of debates about just how much neutrality we can or should expect in science. This thesis examines feminist ideas regarding how to revise and enrich the concept of objectivity, and how these suggestions help achieve both feminist and scientific goals. Feminists offer us warnings about “idealized” concepts of objectivity, and suggest that power can play a crucial role in determining which research programs get labeled “objective”.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae Riane Eisler
    CURRICULUM VITAE RIANE EISLER August 2015 PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES Riane Eisler is a cultural historian, systems scientist, attorney, and author whose interdisciplinary research and writing span fields including anthropology, psychology, sociology, economics, political science, law, gender studies, the humanities, systems science, biology, and evolutionary studies. Profoundly impacted by her early childhood experiences as a Holocaust survivor, Eisler’s research focus has been on identifying the conditions that support our human capacities for consciousness, creativity, and caring, or alternately for insensitivity, destructiveness, and cruelty. 2014-present Co-founder and editor in chief, Interdisciplinary Journal of Partnership Studies, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (http://pubs.lib.umn.edu/ijps/) 2009-present Adjunct professor, California Institute for Integral Studies Transformative Leadership Graduate Program, San Francisco 1987-present Co-founder and president, Center for Partnership Studies (CPS), Pacific Grove, California (http://www.centerforpartnership.org/, http://caringeconomy.org/, http://saiv.org) 1978-1986 Co-founder and co-director, Institute for Futures Forecasting, Carmel, California 1968-1978 1 Public and private law practice and research on the interaction between law and society, Los Angeles, California 1969-1972 Lecturer, Department of Anthropology and Council for Educational Development, University of California, Los Angeles Lecturer, Immaculate Heart College, Los Angeles Founding director, Women's Center Legal Program, Los Angeles 1968-1971 Staff attorney, Los Angeles Women's Center 1966-1968 Attorney, Zagon, Schiff, Hirsch and Levine, Beverly Hills, California 1955-1957 Social Scientist, Rand-Systems Development Corporation, Santa Monica, California 1953-1954 Social Worker, Superior Court, Ann Arbor, Michigan DEGREES 2008 Honorary Ph.D. degree (Doctor of Humane Letters), Saybrook Institute 2005 Honorary Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Feminist Empiricism Draws in Various Ways
    2 FEMINIST EMPIRICISM CATHERINE E. HUNDLEBY eminist empiricism draws in various ways developing new accounts of agency in knowl- on the philosophical tradition of empiri- edge emerges as the second theme in feminist F cism, which can be defined as epistemol- empiricism. ogy that gives primary importance to knowledge Most feminist empiricists employ the meth- based on experience. Feminist demands for atten- odology for developing epistemology known as tion to women’s experiences suggest that empiri- naturalized or naturalist epistemology. Naturalism cism can be a promising resource for developing is controversial, but it welcomes disputation, a feminist account of knowledge. Yet feminists takes up new resources for epistemology on an also value empiricism’s purchase on science and ongoing basis, and encourages multiple approaches the empiricist view that knowers’ abilities depend to the evaluation of knowledge. This pluralism on their experiences and their experiential histo- undercuts naturalism’s and empiricism’s conser- ries, including socialization and psychological vative tendencies and imbues current formula- development. tions of empiricism with radical potential. This chapter explores the attractions of empiricism for feminists. Feminist empiricist analysis ranges from broad considerations about FEMINIST ATTRACTION TO EMPIRICISM popular understandings to technical analysis of narrowly defined scientific fields. Whatever the Empiricism traces in the philosophy of the scope, feminist reworkings of empiricism have global North as far back as Aristotle,1 but it is two central themes. The first theme is the inter- classically associated with the 18th-century play among values in knowledge, especially British philosophers, John Locke, George connecting traditionally recognized empirical Berkeley, and David Hume.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing a Critical Realist Positional Approach to Intersectionality
    Developing a Critical Realist Positional Approach to Intersectionality ANGELA MARTINEZ DY University of Nottingham LEE MARTIN University of Nottingham SUSAN MARLOW University of Nottingham This article identifies philosophical tensions and limitations within contemporary intersectionality theory which, it will be argued, have hindered its ability to explain how positioning in multiple social categories can affect life chances and influence the reproduction of inequality. We draw upon critical realism to propose an augmented conceptual framework and novel methodological approach that offers the potential to move beyond these debates, so as to better enable intersectionality to provide causal explanatory accounts of the ‘lived experiences’ of social privilege and disadvantage. KEYWORDS critical realism, critique, feminism, intersectionality, methodology, ontology Introduction Intersectionality has emerged over the past thirty years as an interdisciplinary approach to analyzing the concurrent impacts of social structures, with a focus on theorizing how belonging to multiple exclusionary social categories can influence political access and equality.1 It conceptualizes the interaction of categories of difference such as gender, race and class at many levels, including individual experience, social practices, institutions and ideologies, and frames the outcomes of these interactions in terms of the distribution and allocation of power.2 As a form of social critique originally rooted in black feminism,3 intersectionality is described by Jennifer
    [Show full text]
  • The Foundation of Feminist Research and Its Distinction from Traditional Research Joanne Ardovini-Brooker, Ph.D
    Home | Business|Career | Workplace | Community | Money | International Advancing Women In Leadership Feminist Epistemology: The Foundation of Feminist Research and its Distinction from Traditional Research Joanne Ardovini-Brooker, Ph.D. ARDOVINI-BROOKER, SPRING, 2002 ...feminist epistemologies are the golden keys that unlock the door to feminist research. Once the door is unlocked, a better understanding of the distinctive nature of feminist research can occur. There are many questions surrounding feminist research. The most common question is: “What makes feminist research distinctive from traditional research within the Social Sciences?” In trying to answer this question, we need to examine feminist epistemology and the intertwining nature of epistemology, methodology (theory and analysis of how research should proceed), and methods (techniques for gathering data) utilized by feminist researchers. Feminist epistemology in contrast to traditional epistemologies is the foundation on which feminist methodology is built. In turn, the research that develops from this methodology differs greatly from research that develops from traditional methodology and epistemology. Therefore, I argue that one must have a general understanding of feminist epistemology and methodology before one can understand what makes this type of research unique. Such a foundation will assist us in our exploration of the realm of feminist research, while illuminating the differences between feminist and traditional research. An Introduction to Feminist Epistemology Epistemology is the study of knowledge and how it is that people come to know what they know (Johnson, 1995, p. 97). Originating from philosophy, epistemology comes to us from a number of disciplines, i.e.: sociology, psychology, political science, education, and women’s studies (Duran, 1991, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Experimental Philosophy and Feminist Epistemology: Conflicts and Complements
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 9-2018 Experimental Philosophy and Feminist Epistemology: Conflicts and Complements Amanda Huminski The Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/2826 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] EXPERIMENTAL PHILOSOPHY AND FEMINIST EPISTEMOLOGY: CONFLICTS AND COMPLEMENTS by AMANDA HUMINSKI A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Philosophy in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2018 © 2018 AMANDA HUMINSKI All Rights Reserved ii Experimental Philosophy and Feminist Epistemology: Conflicts and Complements By Amanda Huminski This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Philosophy in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. _______________________________ ________________________________________________ Date Linda Martín Alcoff Chair of Examining Committee _______________________________ ________________________________________________ Date Nickolas Pappas Executive Officer Supervisory Committee: Jesse Prinz Miranda Fricker THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iii ABSTRACT Experimental Philosophy and Feminist Epistemology: Conflicts and Complements by Amanda Huminski Advisor: Jesse Prinz The recent turn toward experimental philosophy, particularly in ethics and epistemology, might appear to be supported by feminist epistemology, insofar as experimental philosophy signifies a break from the tradition of primarily white, middle-class men attempting to draw universal claims from within the limits of their own experience and research.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Place of Feminist Epistemology in Philosophy of Education
    education sciences Article Knowledge for a Common World? On the Place of Feminist Epistemology in Philosophy of Education Claudia Schumann Department of Education, Stockholm University, Stockholm S-106 91, Sweden; [email protected]; Tel.: +46-816-2000 Academic Editor: Andrew Stables Received: 7 January 2016; Accepted: 3 March 2016; Published: 9 March 2016 Abstract: The paper discusses the place of feminist epistemology in philosophy of education. Against frequently raised criticisms, the paper argues that the issues raised by feminist standpoint theory lead neither to a reduction of questions of knowledge to questions of power or politics nor to the endorsement of relativism. Within the on-going discussion in feminist epistemology, we can find lines of argument which provide the grounds for a far more radical critique of the traditional, narrow notion of objectivity, revealing it as inherently flawed and inconsistent and allowing for the defense of a re-worked, broader, more accurate understanding of objectivity. This is also in the interest of developing a strong basis for a feminist critique of problematically biased and repressive epistemological practices which can further be extended to shed light on the way in which knowledge has become distorted through the repression of other non-dominant epistemic standpoints. Thus, requiring a thorough re-thinking of our conceptions of objectivity and rationality, feminist epistemologies need to be carefully considered in order to improve our understanding of what knowledge for a common world implies in the pluralistic and diverse societies of post-traditional modernity in the 21st century. Keywords: feminist epistemology; situated knowledge; objectivity; relativism 1.
    [Show full text]
  • ~Ethinking Standpoint Epistemology: What Is "Strong Objectivity"?
    ~ethinkingStandpoint Epistemology: What Is "Strong Objectivity"? ~andraHarding "Feminist objectivity means quite simply situated knowledges." -Donna Harawayl . Both Ways For almost two decades, feminists have engaged in a complex and harged conversation about objectivity. Its topics have included which inds of knowledge projects have it, which don't, and why they don't; ihether the many different feminisms need it, and if so why they do; nd if it is possible to get it, how to do so.2 This conversation has been >formed by complex and charged prefeminist writings that tend to et stuck in debates between empiricists and intentionalists, objectiv- its and interpretationists, and realists and social constructionists (in- luding p~ststructuralists).~ Most of these feminist discussions have not arisen from attempts ) find new ways either to criticize or carry on the agendas of the isciplines. Frequently they do not take as their problematics the ones ~miliarwithin the disciplines. Instead, these conversations have merged mainly from two different and related concerns. First, what -e the causes of the immense proliferation of theoretically and em- irically sound results of research in biology and the social sciences at have discovered what is not supposed to exist: rampant sexist and ldrocentric bias-"politicsu!-in the dominant scientific (and pop- .ar) descriptions and explanations of nature and social life? To put .e point another way, how should one explain the surprising fact that ~liticallyguided research projects have been able to produce
    [Show full text]
  • Tuning Gender Studies
    Tuning Educational Structures in Europe Reference Points for the Design and Delivery of Degree Programmes in Gender Studies Life Long Learning Reference Points for the Design and Delivery of Degree Programmes in Gender Studies Reference Points for the Design and Delivery of Degree Programmes in Gender Studies Tuning Educational Structures in Europe The name Tuning was chosen for the project to refl ect the idea that universities do not look for uniformity in their degree programmes or any sort of unifi ed, prescriptive or defi nitive European cur- ricula but simply for points of reference, convergence and common understanding. The protection of the rich diversity of European education has been paramount in the Tuning Project from the very start and the project in no way seeks to restrict the independence of academic and subject special- ists, or undermine local and national academic authority. The Tuning Project is supported by the European Commission through the Socrates and Tempus programmes (of the Directorate-General for Education and Culture) This publication refl ects the views of the authors only, and the European Com- mission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. © Tuning Project Although all material that has been developed as part of the Tuning Project is owned by its formal participants, other Higher Education Institutions are free to test and use the material after publication, provided that the source is ac- knowledged. No part of this publication, including the cover design, may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form or by any means, whether electronical, chemical, mechanical, optical, by recording or photocopying, without prior permission of the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Sense of 'Intersectionality'
    OCCASIONAL PAPER Making sense of ‘intersectionality’ A manual for lovers of people and forests Carol J. Pierce Colfer Bimbika Sijapati Basnett Markus Ihalainen OCCASIONAL PAPER 184 Making sense of ‘intersectionality’ A manual for lovers of people and forests Carol J. Pierce Colfer CIFOR Cornell University Bimbika Sijapati Basnett CIFOR Markus Ihalainen CIFOR Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) Occasional Paper 184 © 2018 Center for International Forestry Research Content in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0), http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ISBN 978-602-387-069-1 DOI: 10.17528/cifor/006793 Colfer CJP, Basnett BS and Ihalainen M. 2018. Making sense of ‘intersectionality’: A manual for lovers of people and forests. Occasional Paper 184. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR. Photo by Ulet Ifansasti/CIFOR Yordana Yawate carries a sack of sago pith as her husband Silas Matoke harvests sago known as ‘pangkur’ on the banks of the Tuba River in Honitetu village, West Seram Regency, Maluku Province, Indonesia. CIFOR Jl. CIFOR, Situ Gede Bogor Barat 16115 Indonesia T +62 (251) 8622-622 F +62 (251) 8622-100 E [email protected] cifor.org We would like to thank all funding partners who supported this research through their contributions to the CGIAR Fund. For a full list of the ‘CGIAR Fund’ funding partners please see: http://www.cgiar.org/our-funders/ Any views expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not necessarily represent the views of CIFOR, the editors, the authors’ institutions, the financial sponsors or the reviewers.
    [Show full text]
  • Front & Back Cover.Indd
    ﺗﻘﻴﻴﻢ ﻣﻨﻬﺠﻴﺔاﻟﺠﻨﺪر ﻟﻺﻧﱰﻧﺖ وﺗﻜﻨﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺎت اﳌﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎت واﻹﺗﺼﺎﻻت أداة ﺗﻌﻠﻢ ﻣﻦ أﺟﻞ اﻟﺘﻐﻴ) واﻟﺘﻤﻜ! ﻣﺮﻓﻖ اﻟﻘﺮص اﳌﺪﻣﺞ ﻣﻨﻬﺠﻴﺔ ﺗﻘﻴﻴﻢ اﻟﺠﻨﺪر ﻟﻺﻧﱰﻧﺖ وﺗﻜﻨﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺎت اﳌﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎت واﻹﺗﺼﺎﻻت أداة ﺗﻌﻠﻢ ﻣﻦ أﺟﻞ اﻟﺘﻐﻴ) واﻟﺘﻤﻜ! ﻣﻨﻬﺠﻴﺔ ﺗﻘﻴﻴﻢ اﻟﺠﻨﺪر ﻟﻺﻧﱰﻧﺖ وﺗﻜﻨﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺎت اﳌﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎت واﻹﺗﺼﺎﻻت أداة ﺗﻌﻠﻢ ﻣﻦ أﺟﻞ اﻟﺘﻐﻴ) واﻟﺘﻤﻜ! راﺑﻄﺔ اﻻﺗﺼﺎﻻت اﳌﺘﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﺞ دﻋﻢ اﻟﺸﺒﻜﺎت اﻻﻟﻜﱰوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻨﺴﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺑﺮاﺑﻄﺔ اﻻﺗﺼﺎﻻت اﳌﺘﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﻣﻨﻬﺠﻴﺔ ﺗﻘﻴﻴﻢ اﻟﺠﻨﺪر ﻧﴩت ﰲ ﻋﺎم 2005. اﻟﱰﺟﻤﺔ اﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ واﻟﻨﴩ ﻋﺎم 2009 ﻣﻨﻬﺠﻴﺔ ﺗﻘﻴﻴﻢ اﻟﺠﻨﺪر ﻟﻺﻧﱰﻧﺖ وﺗﻜﻨﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺎت اﳌﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎت واﻹﺗﺼﺎﻻت أداة ﺗﻌﻠﻢ ﻣﻦ أﺟﻞ اﻟﺘﻐﻴA واﻟﺘﻤﻜ< ﻣﻨﺸﻮرات راﺑﻄﺔ اﻻﺗﺼﺎﻻت اﳌﺘﻘﺪﻣﺔ (APC) ص. ب 29755 ﻣﻴﻠﻔﻴﻞ 2109 ﺟﻨﻮب أﻓﺮﻳﻘﻴﺎ [email protected], www.apc.org وﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﺞ دﻋﻢ اﻟﺸﺒﻜﺎت اﻻﻟﻜﱰوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻨﺴﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺑﺮاﺑﻄﺔ اﻻﺗﺼﺎﻻت اﳌﺘﻘﺪﻣﺔ (APC WNSP) [email protected], www.apcwomen.org ﺗﻢ ﻧﴩ ﻫﺬا اﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﻃﺒﻘﺎً ﻟﻘﻮاﻋﺪ "اﻹﺳﻨﺎد-اﻻﺳﺘﺨﺪاﻣﺎت ﻏ) اﻟﺘﺠﺎرﻳﺔ-اﳌﺸﺎﻃﺮة اﳌﺘﺴﺎوﻳﺔ" (Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike) ﻟﺤﻘﻮق اﻟﻄﺒﻊ واﻟﻨﴩ، اﻟﺼﺎدرة ﻋﻦ ﻣﺆﺳﺴﺔ ee Creative Commons، اﻟﺘﻲ ﺗﺴﻤﺢ ﻟﻠﻘﺎرئ ﺑﻨﺴﺦ أﺟﺰاء ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬا اﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ أو ﺟﻤﻴﻊ ﻣﺤﺘﻮﻳﺎﺗﻪ أو ﺗﻮزﻳﻌﻬﺎ أو ﻋﺮﺿﻬﺎ، أو اﻟﻘﻴﺎم ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺸﺎﻃﺎت اﳌﻮﺿﺤﺔ ﰲ ﻫﺬا اﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ، أو اﺷﺘﻘﺎق أﻋmل أﺧﺮى ﻣﻨﻪ، وذﻟﻚ وﻓﻘﺎً ﻟﻠﴩوط اﻟﺘﺎﻟﻴﺔ: اﻹﺳﻨﺎد: إﻋﻄﺎء اﳌﺆﻟﻒ/اﳌﺆﻟﻔ! ﺣﻘﻪ/ﺣﻘﻬﻢ اﳌﻌﻨﻮي. ﻏA ﺗﺠﺎري: اﺳﺘﺨﺪام اﳌﺎدة ﻟﻸﻏﺮاض ﻏ) اﻟﺘﺠﺎرﻳﺔ ﻓﻘﻂ. اﳌﺸﺎﻃﺮة اﳌﺘﺴﺎوﻳﺔ: إذا ﺗﻢ ﺗﻐﻴ) أو ﺗﺤﻮﻳﻞ أو اﻟﺒﻨﺎء ﻋﲆ ﻣﺤﺘﻮﻳﺎت ﻫﺬا اﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ، ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺗﻮزﻳﻊ اﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ وﻓﻘﺎً ﻟﱰﺧﻴﺺ ﻣﻄﺎﺑﻖ ﻟﻬﺬا اﻟﱰﺧﻴﺺ. ﻣﻦ أﺟﻞ أﻳﺔ إﻋﺎدة اﺳﺘﺨﺪام ﳌﻮاد ﻫﺬا اﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ أو ﺗﻮزﻳﻌﻬﺎ، ﻳﺮﺟﻰ أن ﺗﻮﺿﺢ ﻟﻶﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﴍوط ﺗﺮﺧﻴﺺ ﻫﺬا اﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ. ﻜﻦ اﻟﺘﻨﺎزل ﻋﻦ أي ﴍط ﻣﻦ اﻟﴩوط اﻟﻮاردة أﻋﻼه إذا ﻣﺎ ﺗﻢ اﻟﺤﺼﻮل ﻋﲆ ﻣﻮاﻓﻘﺔ اﳌﺆﻟﻒ/ اﳌﺆﻟﻔ!. إن اﺳﺘﺨﺪاﻣﻚ اﳌﻨﺼﻒ ﳌﻮاد ﻫﺬا اﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ واﻟﺤﻘﻮق اﻷﺧﺮى ﻟﻦ ﺗﺘﺄﺛﺮ ﺑﺄي ﺣﺎل ﻣﻦ اﻷﺣﻮال ﺑﺎﻟﴩوط اﻟﻮاردة أﻋﻼه. اﻟﺮﻗﻢ اﳌﻌﻴﺎري اﻟﺪوﱄ ﻟﻠﻜﺘﺎب: ISBN 92-95049-67-5.
    [Show full text]