Impacts of Land Use on Biodiversity: Development of Spatially Differentiated Global Assessment Methodologies for Life Cycle Assessment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Impacts of Land Use on Biodiversity: Development of Spatially Differentiated Global Assessment Methodologies for Life Cycle Assessment DISS. ETH NO. xx Impacts of land use on biodiversity: development of spatially differentiated global assessment methodologies for life cycle assessment A dissertation submitted to ETH ZURICH for the degree of Doctor of Sciences presented by LAURA SIMONE DE BAAN Master of Sciences ETH born January 23, 1981 citizen of Steinmaur (ZH), Switzerland accepted on the recommendation of Prof. Dr. Stefanie Hellweg, examiner Prof. Dr. Thomas Koellner, co-examiner Dr. Llorenç Milà i Canals, co-examiner 2013 In Gedenken an Frans Remarks This thesis is a cumulative thesis and consists of five research papers, which were written by several authors. The chapters Introduction and Concluding Remarks were written by myself. For the sake of consistency, I use the personal pronoun ‘we’ throughout this thesis, even in the chapters Introduction and Concluding Remarks. Summary Summary Today, one third of the Earth’s land surface is used for agricultural purposes, which has led to massive changes in global ecosystems. Land use is one of the main current and projected future drivers of biodiversity loss. Because many agricultural commodities are traded globally, their production often affects multiple regions. Therefore, methodologies with global coverage are needed to analyze the effects of land use on biodiversity. Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a tool that assesses environmental impacts over the entire life cycle of products, from the extraction of resources to production, use, and disposal. Although LCA aims to provide information about all relevant environmental impacts, prior to this Ph.D. project, globally applicable methods for capturing the effects of land use on biodiversity did not exist. The goal of this thesis was thus to develop operational LCA methods for quantifying the effects of land use on biodiversity. The methods needed to provide global coverage and be spatially explicit. One central research question was how we could measure biodiversity, as a very complex and multi-faceted concept, within LCA using available global data. This thesis encompasses four approaches, which were tested in case studies to assess and illustrate their applicability. We began with an evaluation of how biodiversity loss is modeled within LCA (Chapter 2). Two drivers of biodiversity loss have thus far not been quantified: overexploitation and invasive species. The methodologies for assessing the effects of three other drivers (habitat loss, climate change, and pollution) involve several conceptual shortcomings, with scale considerations largely absent. The current practice of aggregating the impacts of multiple drivers of biodiversity loss into a single score is questionable, because species loss refers to different spatial scales of loss (e.g., local, regional, or global loss). Within existing methods, taxonomic and geographic coverage is very limited, globally applicable methods are largely absent, and most methods are not spatially explicit. Based on the identified conceptual shortcomings, we developed four new methods to overcome some of these limitations. The first method (Chapter 3) is based on a global literature review, which collected data on comparative biological surveys (GLOBIO3). The species richness of used and unused (natural) land was compared within one region, and relative local species loss was calculated. The effects on biodiversity were found to depend on the taxonomic group, the biome, the type of land use, and the choice of the biodiversity indicator. In general, a negative impact of land use on biodiversity was observed, but the results showed considerable variation. In Chapter 4, we further developed this method to quantify differences between organic and conventional agricultural products. We collected specific data on vascular plant species’ richness in organic and conventional fields, and developed a regional weighting scheme to assess the values of different ecosystems. Based on a case study of Swedish milk, we showed that while production of organic milk required twice the area, its impact on biodiversity was 5 Summary half that of conventional milk. Feedstuffs imported from tropical countries largely contributed to the overall impact. In Chapter 5, we applied species-area relationship models to quantify regional species losses resulting from accumulated land use for all global ecoregions. We distinguished between the potentially reversible regional losses of non-endemic species due to land occupation and transformation and the irreversible, permanent losses of endemic species. The regions with the highest species losses were similar across taxonomic groups (mammals, plants, birds, reptiles, and amphibians) and overlapped with regions where most natural land had been converted in the past. For regions threatened by future habitat loss, we also illustrated how future impacts could be modeled based on land use scenarios. In Chapter 6, we used habitat suitability models for mammals to model impacts of land occupation and transformation per 900m grid-cell. For all grid-cells, we modeled species richness assuming agricultural use, and calculated species losses compared to the richness under the two reference scenarios of non-use or current land use. The loss of species was weighted by the species’ global rarity and threat status (the latter according to IUCN classification), so that the assessment could serve as a proxy for global species extinction risk. Finally, the method was applied to a case study of the land use impacts of coffee, tea, and tobacco cultivation in East Africa. The results were compared to the results of the methods developed in Chapters 3 and 5. In Chapter 7, we compared the methods developed within this thesis with other methods that have the potential for global application, and offered our recommendations on the application and further development of land use assessment methods. The relative, local method (Chapter 3) should only be applied in conjunction with a regional weighting scheme (Chapter 4). The method developed in Chapter 5 is directly applicable on a global scale and encompasses effects on five taxonomic groups and aspects of reversibility. If the origin of a product is known in detail, the method from Chapter 5 should be complemented with the method from Chapter 6, which captures how the threat of land use affects the survival of single mammal species with a fine spatial resolution. However, the method from Chapter 6 is currently only operational for East Africa, and still needs to be expanded to apply to all world regions. This thesis significantly improves on past land use impact assessment methods. However, modeling spatially differentiated biodiversity impacts within LCA still requires methodological improvements in multiple areas. Further development and testing of these methods will contribute to a better understanding of the impacts of economic activities on biodiversity, and help identify and prevent the shifting of burdens between regions or environmental compartments. 6 Zusammenfassung Zusammenfassung Ein Drittel der weltweiten Landfläche wird heute landwirtschaftlich genutzt, was einen massiven Eingriff in die Ökosysteme bewirkt und stark zum globalem Biodiversitätsverlust beiträgt. Da viele landwirtschaftliche Konsumgüter global gehandelt werden, beeinflusst die Herstellung oft mehrere Weltregionen. Um die Auswirkungen von Landnutzung auf die Biodiversität zu bewerten, reicht daher oft eine regionale Analyse nicht aus. Ökobilanzen setzten hier an. Sie erfassen die Umweltauswirkungen von Produkten über deren gesamten Lebensweg, von der Ressourcenentnahme über die Produktion und Nutzung bis hin zur Entsorgung. Obwohl Ökobilanzen ein möglichst vollständiges Bild aller relevanten Umweltauswirkungen bezwecken, fehlten bisher anwendbare Methoden zur globalen Quantifizierung von Landnutzungseffekten auf die Biodiversität. Das Ziel der vorliegenden Arbeit ist es, global anwendbare und räumlich spezifische Ökobilanz-Methoden zur Bewertung von Biodiversitätsverlust durch Landnutzung zu entwickeln. Eine Hauptfragestellung war, wie anhand der global verfügbaren Daten Biodiversität sinnvoll in Ökobilanzen erfasst werden kann. Wir entwickelten vier neue Methodenansätze und testeten sie in Fallstudien, um Schlussfolgerungen über deren Anwendbarkeit ziehen zu können. Die Arbeit beginnt mit einer Evaluation der existierenden Ansätze zur Bewertung von Biodiversitätsverlust in Ökobilanzen (Kapitel 2). Zwei Ursachen von Artenverlust werden bei diesen Ansätzen nicht berücksichtigt: Übernutzung und invasive Arten. Die bestehenden Bewertungsmethoden für Habitatverlust, Klimawandel und Schadstoffbelastung weisen verschiedene konzeptionelle Mängel auf. Der räumliche Massstab des Artenverlustes ist oft nicht definiert und grösstenteils fehlt eine räumliche Differenzierung. Somit erwies sich die gängige Praxis, die Biodiversitätsverluste von unterschiedlichen Ursachen zu addieren, als wenig sinnvoll, da die Verluste sich auf verschiedene räumliche Massstäbe beziehen (z.B. lokaler, regionaler oder globaler Artenverlust). Nur wenige Artengruppen und Weltregionen sind in den untersuchten Methoden abgebildet, globale Ansätze fehlen weitgehend. Zur Ausbesserung der bestehenden methodischen Mängel wurden vier neue Ansätze entwickelt. Die erste Methode (Kapitel 3) nutzte Daten einer globalen Literaturrecherche biologischer Studien (GLOBIO3). Die Artenzahl von genutzten und ungenutzten (natürlichen) Flächen einer Region wurde verglichen und der relative lokale Artenverlust berechnet. Die Effekte auf die Biodiversität
Recommended publications
  • Blomstedt2014.Pdf (9.403Mb)
    School of GeoSciences DISSERTATION For the degree of MSc in Geographical Information Science William Blomstedt August 2014 COPYRIGHT STATEMENT Copyright of this dissertation is retained by the author and The University of Edinburgh. Ideas contained in this dissertation remain the intellectual property of the author and their supervisors, except where explicitly otherwise referenced. All rights reserved. The use of any part of this dissertation reproduced, transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise or stored in a retrieval system without the prior written consent of the author and The University of Edinburgh (Institute of Geography) is not permitted. STATEMENT OF ORIGINALITY AND LENGTH I declare that this dissertation represents my own work, and that where the work of others has been used it has been duly accredited. I further declare that the length of the components of this dissertation is 5259 words (including in-text references) for the Research Paper and 7917 words for the Technical Report. Signed: Date: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to recognize the faculty and staff of the University of Edinburgh Geosciences Department for the instruction and guidance this school year. Special acknowledgements to Bruce Gittings, William Mackaness, Neil Stuart and Caroline Nichol for sound thoughts and dissertation advice. I also extend a kind thank you to my advisor Alasdair MacArthur for agreeing to undertake this project with me. Thanks to all my fellow students on this MSc program. For the extensive effort leant to providing scale-hive data I am in debt to • Ari Seppälä, Finnish Beekeepers Association, MTT Agrifood Research Finland, Seppo Korpela, Sakari Raiskio • Jure Justinek and Čebelarske zveze Slovenije • René Zumsteg and Verein Deutschschweizerischer Und Rätoromanischer Bienenfreunde, Swise • Centre Apicole de Recherche et Information For his kindness and help starting this project I would like to distinguish Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Robert C. Rhew Dept
    Curriculum vitae: June, 2016 Robert Rhew, UC Berkeley Robert C. Rhew Dept. of Geography / Dept. of Environmental Science, Policy and Management Lab: (510) 643-6984 University of California, Berkeley Facsimile: (510) 642-3370 Berkeley, CA 94720-4740 E-mail: [email protected] EDUCATION 1992 B.A. Earth & Planetary Sciences (Atmospheres and Oceans) Harvard University Magna cum laUde with highest honors Cambridge, MA 1994 Graduate Diploma. Resource & Env’t Management Australian National University Diploma with Distinction Canberra, ACT 2001 Ph.D. Earth Sciences (Geochemistry) Scripps Institution of Oceanography, UCSD Thesis title: Production and Consumption of Methyl Bromide and Methyl La Jolla, CA Chloride by the Terrestrial Biosphere ACADEMIC EMPLOYMENT 2012 – present Associate Professor, Dept. Envt. Science, Policy & Mgt. University of California, Berkeley 2009 – present Associate Professor, Department of Geography University of California, Berkeley 2006 – present Geological Scientist Faculty, Earth Sciences Division Lawrence Berkeley National Labs, CA 2013 – 2014 Visiting Faculty Fellow, National Center for Atmospheric Research NCAR, Boulder, CO 2013 – 2014 CIRES Visiting Fellow, NOAA/ CIRES University of Colorado, Boulder 2003 – 2009 Assistant Professor, Department of Geography University of California, Berkeley 2001 – 2003 Postdoctoral Researcher, Earth System Science University of California, Irvine UCAR/NOAA Climate and Global Change Postdoctoral Fellowship, Host: Prof. Eric Saltzman Other appointments: Affiliate faculty in Energy
    [Show full text]
  • Hidden Fungal Diversity from the Neotropics: Geastrum Hirsutum, G
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Hidden fungal diversity from the Neotropics: Geastrum hirsutum, G. schweinitzii (Basidiomycota, Geastrales) and their allies 1☯ 1☯ 2 3 Thiago AcciolyID , Julieth O. Sousa , Pierre-Arthur Moreau , Christophe LeÂcuru , 4 5 5 6 7 Bianca D. B. Silva , MeÂlanie Roy , Monique Gardes , Iuri G. Baseia , MarõÂa P. MartõÂnID * 1 Programa de PoÂs-GraduacËão em SistemaÂtica e EvolucËão, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil, 2 EA4483 IMPECS, UFR Pharmacie, Universite de Lille, Lille, France, 3 Herbarium LIP, UFR Pharmacie, Universite de Lille, Lille, France, 4 Departamento de BotaÃnica, Instituto de a1111111111 Biologia, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Ondina, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil, 5 Laboratoire UMR5174 Evolution a1111111111 et Diversite Biologique (EDB), Universite Toulouse 3 Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France, 6 Departamento de a1111111111 BotaÃnica e Zoologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil, a1111111111 7 Departamento de MicologõÂa, Real JardõÂn BotaÂnico-CSIC, Madrid, Spain a1111111111 ☯ These authors contributed equally to this work. * [email protected] OPEN ACCESS Abstract  Citation: Accioly T, Sousa JO, Moreau P-A, Lecuru Taxonomy of Geastrum species in the neotropics has been subject to divergent opinions C, Silva BDB, Roy M, et al. (2019) Hidden fungal diversity from the Neotropics: Geastrum hirsutum, among specialists. In our study, type collections were reassessed and compared with G. schweinitzii (Basidiomycota, Geastrales) and recent collections in order to delimit species in Geastrum, sect. Myceliostroma, subsect. their allies. PLoS ONE 14(2): e0211388. https://doi. Epigaea. A thorough review of morphologic features combined with barcode and phyloge- org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211388 netic analyses (ITS and LSU nrDNA) revealed six new species (G.
    [Show full text]
  • Broken Hill Complex
    Broken Hill Complex Bioregion resources Photo Mulyangarie, DEH Broken Hill Complex The Broken Hill Complex bioregion is located in western New South Wales and eastern South Australia, spanning the NSW-SA border. It includes all of the Barrier Ranges and covers a huge area of nearly 5.7 million hectares with approximately 33% falling in South Australia! It has an arid climate with dry hot summers and mild winters. The average rainfall is 222mm per year, with slightly more rainfall occurring in summer. The bioregion is rich with Aboriginal cultural history, with numerous archaeological sites of significance. Biodiversity and habitat The bioregion consists of low ranges, and gently rounded hills and depressions. The main vegetation types are chenopod and samphire shrublands; casuarina forests and woodlands and acacia shrublands. Threatened animal species include the Yellow-footed Rock- wallaby and Australian Bustard. Grazing, mining and wood collection for over 100 years has led to a decline in understory plant species and cover, affecting ground nesting birds and ground feeding insectivores. 2 | Broken Hill Complex Photo by Francisco Facelli Broken Hill Complex Threats Threats to the Broken Hill Complex bioregion and its dependent species include: For Further information • erosion and degradation caused by overgrazing by sheep, To get involved or for more information please cattle, goats, rabbits and macropods phone your nearest Natural Resources Centre or • competition and predation by feral animals such as rabbits, visit www.naturalresources.sa.gov.au
    [Show full text]
  • Global Ecological Forest Classification and Forest Protected Area Gap Analysis
    United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre Global Ecological Forest Classification and Forest Protected Area Gap Analysis Analyses and recommendations in view of the 10% target for forest protection under the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) 2nd revised edition, January 2009 Global Ecological Forest Classification and Forest Protected Area Gap Analysis Analyses and recommendations in view of the 10% target for forest protection under the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) Report prepared by: United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC) World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) Network World Resources Institute (WRI) Institute of Forest and Environmental Policy (IFP) University of Freiburg Freiburg University Press 2nd revised edition, January 2009 The United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP- WCMC) is the biodiversity assessment and policy implementation arm of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), the world's foremost intergovernmental environmental organization. The Centre has been in operation since 1989, combining scientific research with practical policy advice. UNEP-WCMC provides objective, scientifically rigorous products and services to help decision makers recognize the value of biodiversity and apply this knowledge to all that they do. Its core business is managing data about ecosystems and biodiversity, interpreting and analysing that data to provide assessments and policy analysis, and making the results
    [Show full text]
  • Ecosystem Profile Madagascar and Indian
    ECOSYSTEM PROFILE MADAGASCAR AND INDIAN OCEAN ISLANDS FINAL VERSION DECEMBER 2014 This version of the Ecosystem Profile, based on the draft approved by the Donor Council of CEPF was finalized in December 2014 to include clearer maps and correct minor errors in Chapter 12 and Annexes Page i Prepared by: Conservation International - Madagascar Under the supervision of: Pierre Carret (CEPF) With technical support from: Moore Center for Science and Oceans - Conservation International Missouri Botanical Garden And support from the Regional Advisory Committee Léon Rajaobelina, Conservation International - Madagascar Richard Hughes, WWF – Western Indian Ocean Edmond Roger, Université d‘Antananarivo, Département de Biologie et Ecologie Végétales Christopher Holmes, WCS – Wildlife Conservation Society Steve Goodman, Vahatra Will Turner, Moore Center for Science and Oceans, Conservation International Ali Mohamed Soilihi, Point focal du FEM, Comores Xavier Luc Duval, Point focal du FEM, Maurice Maurice Loustau-Lalanne, Point focal du FEM, Seychelles Edmée Ralalaharisoa, Point focal du FEM, Madagascar Vikash Tatayah, Mauritian Wildlife Foundation Nirmal Jivan Shah, Nature Seychelles Andry Ralamboson Andriamanga, Alliance Voahary Gasy Idaroussi Hamadi, CNDD- Comores Luc Gigord - Conservatoire botanique du Mascarin, Réunion Claude-Anne Gauthier, Muséum National d‘Histoire Naturelle, Paris Jean-Paul Gaudechoux, Commission de l‘Océan Indien Drafted by the Ecosystem Profiling Team: Pierre Carret (CEPF) Harison Rabarison, Nirhy Rabibisoa, Setra Andriamanaitra,
    [Show full text]
  • The Vegetation and Flora of Auyuittuq National Park Reserve, Baffin Island
    THE VEGETATION AND FLORA OF AUYUITTOQ NATIONAL PARK RESERVE, BAFFIN ISLAND ;JAMES E. HINES AND STEVE MOORE DEPARTMENT OF RENEWABLE RESOURCES GOVERNMENT OF THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES YELLOWKNIFE I NORTHWEST TERRITORIES I XlA 2L9 1988 A project completed under contract to Environment Canada, Canadian Parks Service, Prairie and Northern Region, Winnipeg, Manitoba. 0 ~tona Renewable Resources File Report No. 74 Renewabl• R•sources ~ Government of tha N p .0. Box l 310 Ya\lowknif e, NT XlA 2L9 ii! ABSTRACT The purposes of this investigation were to describe the flora and major types of plant communities present in Auyuittuq National Park Reserve, Baffin Island, and to evaluate factors influencing the distribution of the local vegetation. Six major types of plant communities were recognized based on detailed descriptions of the physical environment, flora, and ground cover of shrubs, herbs, bryophytes, ·and lichens at 100 sites. Three highly interrelated variables (elevation, soil moisture, and texture of surficial deposits) seemed to be important in determining the distribution and abundance of plant communities. Continuous vegetation developed mainly at low elevations on mesic to wet, fine-textured deposits. Wet tundra, characterized by abundant cover of shrubs, grasses, sedges, and forbs, occurred most frequently on wet, fine-textured marine and fluvial sediments. Dwarf shrub-qram.inoid comm.unities were comprised of abundant shrubs, grasses, sedges and forbs and were found most frequently below elevations of 400 m on mesic till or colluvial deposits. Dwarf shrub comm.unities were characterized by abundant dwarf shrub and lichen cover. They developed at similar elevations and on similar types of surficial deposits as dwarf-shrub graminoid communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Buhlmann Etal 2009.Pdf
    Chelonian Conservation and Biology, 2009, 8(2): 116–149 g 2009 Chelonian Research Foundation A Global Analysis of Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle Distributions with Identification of Priority Conservation Areas 1 2 3 KURT A. BUHLMANN ,THOMAS S.B. AKRE ,JOHN B. IVERSON , 1,4 5 6 DENO KARAPATAKIS ,RUSSELL A. MITTERMEIER ,ARTHUR GEORGES , 7 5 1 ANDERS G.J. RHODIN ,PETER PAUL VAN DIJK , AND J. WHITFIELD GIBBONS 1University of Georgia, Savannah River Ecology Laboratory, Drawer E, Aiken, South Carolina 29802 USA [[email protected]; [email protected]]; 2Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Longwood University, 201 High Street, Farmville, Virginia 23909 USA [[email protected]]; 3Department of Biology, Earlham College, Richmond, Indiana 47374 USA [[email protected]]; 4Savannah River National Laboratory, Savannah River Site, Building 773-42A, Aiken, South Carolina 29802 USA [[email protected]]; 5Conservation International, 2011 Crystal Drive, Suite 500, Arlington, Virginia 22202 USA [[email protected]; [email protected]]; 6Institute for Applied Ecology Research Group, University of Canberra, Australian Capitol Territory 2601, Canberra, Australia [[email protected]]; 7Chelonian Research Foundation, 168 Goodrich Street, Lunenburg, Massachusetts 01462 USA [[email protected]] ABSTRACT. – There are currently ca. 317 recognized species of turtles and tortoises in the world. Of those that have been assessed on the IUCN Red List, 63% are considered threatened, and 10% are critically endangered, with ca. 42% of all known turtle species threatened. Without directed strategic conservation planning, a significant portion of turtle diversity could be lost over the next century. Toward that conservation effort, we compiled museum and literature occurrence records for all of the world’s tortoises and freshwater turtle species to determine their distributions and identify priority regions for conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Reorienting Systematic Conservation Assessment for Effective Conservation Planning
    Contributed Paper Reorienting Systematic Conservation Assessment for Effective Conservation Planning BRENT J. SEWALL,∗†‡¶ AMY L. FREESTONE,† MOHAMED F. E. MOUTUI,§ NASSURI TOILIBOU,§ ISHAKA SA¨ID,§ SAINDOU M. TOUMANI,§ DAOUD ATTOUMANE,§ AND CHEIKH M. IBOURA§ ∗Department of Wildlife, Fish, and Conservation Biology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, U.S.A. †Department of Biology, Temple University, 1900 N. 12th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19122, U.S.A. ‡Action Comores International, The Old Rectory, Stansfield, Suffolk CO10 8LT, United Kingdom §Action Comores antenne Anjouan, B.P. 279, Mutsamudu, Anjouan, Union of the Comoros, Western Indian Ocean Abstract: Systematic conservation assessment (an information-gathering and prioritization process used to select the spatial foci of conservation initiatives) is often considered vital to conservation-planning efforts, yet published assessments have rarely resulted in conservation action. Conservation assessments may lead more directly to effective conservation action if they are reoriented to inform conservation decisions. Toward this goal, we evaluated the relative priority for conservation of 7 sites proposed for the first forest reserves in the Union of the Comoros, an area with high levels of endemism and rapidly changing land uses in the western Indian Ocean. Through the analysis of 30 indicator variables measured at forest sites and nearby villages, we assessed 3 prioritization criteria at each site: conservation value, threat to loss of biological diversity from human activity, and feasibility of reserve establishment. Our results indicated 2 sites, Yim´er´eand Hassera-Ndreng´e, were priorities for conservation action. Our approach also informed the development of an implementation strategy and enabled an evaluation of previously unexplored relations among prioritization criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Mozambique Channel Seascape
    WWF MDCO priority landscapes NEWSLETTER FACTSHEET APRIL Northern Mozambique Channel Seascape 2016 A hotspot of marine and coastal biodiversity and one of the last large marine sanctuaries in the Western Indian Ocean © WWF / Iñaki Relanzon AT A GLANCE Promoting integrated ocean management for sustainable development • Size: 800,000 km² The Northern Mozambique Channel (NMC) region is one of world’s outstanding marine and terrestrial biodiversity areas and a biological reservoir for all East African coastal areas. The • Population: 10 biological and conservation values of the NMC area are of global importance as confirmed by million multiple reports including the 2012 assessment of Ecologically or Biologically Significant Areas (EBSAs). • Ecosystems: coral The economic importance of the NMC has emerged as a future driver of national and regional reefs, mangroves, development on a scale not previously realized in East Africa, due to the high fishery productivity coastal wetlands, of the Mozambique Channel, recent findings of globally significant natural gas deposits and a high seagrasses, islands potential for coastal tourism development. Accelerating population growth in the NMC region (rising and islets, deep to 20 million, by 2040) will increase demands for and pressures on resources, while at the same time ocean, coastal forests providing opportunities for economic growth and building prosperity. • Landscape The region is characterized by lackluster governance of marine resources, including low capacity, features: the second weak law
    [Show full text]
  • Baseline Study
    Nostra Project – Baseline study Gulf of Finland This document is presented in the name of BIO by Deloitte. BIO by Deloitte is a commercial brand of the legal entity BIO Intelligence Service. The legal entity BIO Intelligence Service is a 100% owned subsidiary of Deloitte Conseil since 26 June 2013. Disclaimer: The views expressed in this report are purely those of the authors and may not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the partners of the NOSTRA network. The methodological approach that was applied during the baseline study is presented in the final report of the study. The analysis that is provided in this report is based on the data collected and reported by the Nostra partners, a complementary literature review conducted by the consultants, and the results provided by the methodological toolkit developed in the framework of the baseline study. Acknowledgement: This report has received support from the County of Helsinki-Uusimaa, and the county of Tallinn- Harju, Estonia. The authors would like to thank them for providing information requested for completing this study. Limitations of the analysis: The consultants faced a limited amount of data. In general, In general, on both sides of the strait, involved partners are facing difficulties in collecting social-economic and biodiversity related data. Moreover, the analytical results provided in this report represent mainly the perspective of the Finnish side of the strait, as the Estonian side does not have the research capacity to provide required data. Baseline study of
    [Show full text]
  • Building Nature's Safety Net 2008
    Building Nature’s Safety Net 2008 Progress on the Directions for the National Reserve System Paul Sattler and Martin Taylor Telstra is a proud partner of the WWF Building Nature's Map sources and caveats Safety Net initiative. The Interim Biogeographic Regionalisation for Australia © WWF-Australia. All rights protected (IBRA) version 6.1 (2004) and the CAPAD (2006) were ISBN: 1 921031 271 developed through cooperative efforts of the Australian Authors: Paul Sattler and Martin Taylor Government Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage WWF-Australia and the Arts and State/Territory land management agencies. Head Office Custodianship rests with these agencies. GPO Box 528 Maps are copyright © the Australian Government Department Sydney NSW 2001 of Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts 2008 or © Tel: +612 9281 5515 Fax: +612 9281 1060 WWF-Australia as indicated. www.wwf.org.au About the Authors First published March 2008 by WWF-Australia. Any reproduction in full or part of this publication must Paul Sattler OAM mention the title and credit the above mentioned publisher Paul has a lifetime experience working professionally in as the copyright owner. The report is may also be nature conservation. In the early 1990’s, whilst with the downloaded as a pdf file from the WWF-Australia website. Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service, Paul was the principal This report should be cited as: architect in doubling Queensland’s National Park estate. This included the implementation of representative park networks Sattler, P.S. and Taylor, M.F.J. 2008. Building Nature’s for bioregions across the State. Paul initiated and guided the Safety Net 2008.
    [Show full text]