The Watchdogs

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Watchdogs The Watchdogs A close look at Anti-Racist 6l[atchdog' Groups by Laird lllilcox Copyrtght 1998 by Lalrd lf,ilcox All Rfghtr Rerered rsBrr 0-993592-89-2 Lalrd Wllcox -, Editorlal Research Service PO Box 2(J47 ,f "=':t3:#=:::= i Phone/FAX: (9131 829-0609 Email: [email protected] t The Watchdogs A close look at Anti-Racist *Watchdog' Groups by Laird trIilcox Copyrtght 1998 by Lalrd Wilcox All Rights Resered ISBII 0-993592-49-2 Laird Wilcox Editorial Research Senrice PO Box 2o,47 Olathe, KS 66051 Phone/FAX: (9131 829-o16o9- tmail: [email protected] Foreword Any criticism of so-called "anti-racist" Watchdog activists is not without its dangers. In the "either/or" and "good guys versus bad guys" mentality that characterizes the "anti-racist" milieu it's easy to be misunderstood. Most people, unaware of the ideological roots of many "anti-racist" activists or their general disdain for the civil liberties of their critics, regard them as reasonable response to a legitimate grievances - which in some cases they are. Watchdog groups do some laudable things, particularly in the area of promoting bona fide intergroup harmony. On the other hand, there's a dark side to the Watchdog mindset that itself requires scrutiny. Organizing for or against specific causes is an American tradition and the right to organize, agitate, and propagandize is part of our constitutional heritage. A civil libertarian since my teens, I am a 36- year member of the American Civil Liberties Union. I'm also active in opposing the death penalty and work with Amnesty International toward its abolition. Like most liberals of my era, I have always had a strong sympathy for the underdog. I marched in the picket lines during the early civil rights movement and served as an officer of the Lawrence, KS, chapter of the Congress of Racial Equality (CORE). For me the real issue in the civil rights movement was freedom - freedom in the sense of non-constraint, of having choices, and of being able to speak ones mind. What I objected to about racism was the treatment of individual members of a class (in this case racial minorities) as if they were responsible for all other members of that class, that because they were alike in some respects they were alike in all respects, and that race or ethnic identity was a basis for the granting or denying rights and privileges. I worked hard lobbying on behalf of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 which effectively opened the door for black people in employment, housing and many other areas. I sti[ feel this way today. What I did not realize at that time was the peculiar attraction of "anti-racism" as an ideolory that could explain all things and justify almost any counse of action. In the thirty years since the civil rights advances of the 1960s the voices of "anti-racism" have become progressively more shrill and demanding as market forces have influenced the movement. Simply said, there are careers, status, jobs, and influence to be had as long as "racism" exists. As specific problems are solved new problems are defined and created to keep the movement alive. Indeed, there is an "anti-racist" industry afoot in the United States that has attracted bullying, moralizing fanatics, whose identity and livelihood depend upon growth and expansion. "Anti-racism" is particularly problematic because it's one of those terms that sets off'Teel good" emotions among sympathetic individuals. It's like rescuing puppies, feeding the staruing, protecting children, or helping old people across the street. It overllows with "better than" messages and invokes images of fairness, decency, caring, altruism, and moral superiority - this last a commodity in high demand among individuals who need to define themselves in terms of their goodness and humanitarianism in contrast to the badness and selfishness of others. Another problem with the "anti-racist" moyement is its utility as a trojan horse to hawk a hidden agenda. "Anti-racism" is viewed as a response to an existing evil and by itself avoids the kind of scrutiny that more formal ideologies experience. Marxism-Leninism, for example, can be attacked on multiple grounds. For the casual mind, the only basis for attacking "anti-racism" is racism and no further examination is required. However, many (but not all) radical "anti-racists" today believe that in order to combat racism our social system must be overthrown and replaced with something more t- congenial to their ends, and this involves issues of property, privacy, censorshipr persecution of dissidents, and intolerance of any opposition. Algreat many sins disappear when one becomes an "anti-racist' activist. Lives that would ordinarily be insignificant become important; hostility, contempt and hatred becomes reframed as moral outrage; and one has a delicious repertoire of epithets to use against critics and skeptics. As an "anti- racist" crusader, one can do things and say things to other human beings that would be out of the question otherwise and not only get away with them, but receive praise for them as well. How did this happen? First, there is the remarkable appeal of altruism. Generally, the more seemingly noble and altruistic the cause, the more it appears to be removed from the ordinary human vices of pride, malice, and selfishness. For people who need to have their lives reframed in this manner, nothing is so temporarily tranquilizing as a noble cause or crusade to lift the spirits and boost self-esteem. Some therapists even prescribe this: "Go find yourself a nice cause to get involved in and get your mind offof yourself." It often works. A second reason is the growing culture of victimhood. Being a victim means one has a grievance, and to have a grievance elevates one above the crowd. To be sure, there are bona lide victims with bona fide grievances, but what we have seen in recent years is the development of a cult of victimization -- victimization as ideology, identity, and quasi-religion all in one. A third reason is undoubtedly economic. The simple fact is there's money to be made. The classic case of this is Morris I)ees' Southern Poverty Law Center which now (199E) has reserves approaching 100 million dollars squeezed from donors. Even smaller "anti-racist' groups often find themselves awash in donations, government and private grants. In June 1998, for examplg Leonard Zeskind, President of his self-created 56lnstitute for Research and Education on Human Rights" was the recipient of a $295,000 award from the Chicago-based MacArthur Foundationr Finally, because of the manner in which "anti-racism' can be molded and shaped to serve other interests. Activists with a hidden radical agenda find anti-racist organizations very amenable to manipulation. Almost no one buys into traditional class struggle Marxism-Leninism anymore. Democratic capitalism has produced the highest standard of living and most individual freedom the world has ever seen. In rational terms, class struggle Marxism-Leninism is a hard sell. However, when its reframed as anti-racism and anti-fascism, much of the onus is gone. There is a humanist anti-racism that focuses on reconciliation and healing, that works to bring people together, that functions openly and honestly without the use of dossiers, spies, specious lawsuits, disinformation, and that recognizes the rights of individuals whether they agree or not. This I support and always have. On the other hand there is a vindictive and cormpt "anti-racism" that focuses on paybaclis and punishment, that demonizes and degrades its critics, that attempts to carre out special rights for its constituency, that opposes free and open discussion of ideas, that attempts to silence, censor and stifle its opposition through intimidation and harassment, and sics law enforcement on opponents purely because of their alleged values, opinions and beliefs. This kind of anti-racism is more dangerous than the problem it purports to remedy, and this is the anti-racism of the Watchdog organizations. This I oppose. Laird Wilcox I "29 Are Chosen For The MacArthur Foundation's Fellowships," New York Times Q June 1998); John D. & Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation (wvw. macfdn.org), Chicago, IL 1998. Introduction We sure could have fascism here but we'd have to call it anti-fascism, Louisiana Governor Huey "Kingfish" Long, quoted in On 1984 by Peter Stanslcy, 1983. Violent antipathies are always suspicious and betray a secret affinity. William Hazletto Charucteristics, 1 823. A good end cannot sanctifo evil means; nor must we ever do evil, that good may come of it. William Penn, Some Fruits of Solitude in Reflections and Maxims. Given sufficient control over information and enough public distance from the reality of events, even the most unlikely situations can be endowed with powerful emotional trappings. W. Lance Bennett, Public Opinion in American Politics, 1980. To punish a man because we infer from the nature of some doctrine which he holds, or from the conduct of other persons who hold the same doctrines with him, that he will commit a crime, is persecution, and is, in every case, foolish and wicked. Thomas Babington Macaulay, Hallum, 1828. The surest way to work up a crusade in favor of some good cause is to promise people they will have a chance of maltreating someone. To be able to destroy with good conscience, to be able to behave badly and call your bad behavior 'righteous indignation' - this is the height of psychological luxury, the most delicious of moral treats. Aldous H*ley, Chrome Yellan1l9Zl. The slogan, 'the end justifies the meansr' a great favorite of revolutionists and opportunists, is an aflirmation of activist ethics.
Recommended publications
  • Jones (Stephen) Oklahoma City Bombing Archive, 1798 – 2003 (Bulk 1995 – 1997)
    JONES (STEPHEN) OKLAHOMA CITY BOMBING ARCHIVE, 1798 ± 2003 (BULK 1995 ± 1997). See TARO record at http://www.lib.utexas.edu/taro/utcah/03493/cah-03493.html (Approximately 620 linear feet) This collection is open for research use. Portions are restricted due to privacy concerns. See Archivist's Note for more details. Use of DAT and Beta tapes by appointment only; please contact repository for more information. This collection is stored remotely. Advance notice required for retrieval. Contact repository for retrieval. Cite as: Stephen Jones Oklahoma City Bombing Archive, 1798 ± 2003 (Bulk 1995 ± 1997), Dolph Briscoe Center for American History, University of Texas at Austin. [AR 98-395; 2003-055; 2005-161] ______________________________________________________________________________ BIOGRAPHICAL NOTE: Stephen Jones (born 1940) was appointed in May 1995 by the United States District Court in Oklahoma City to serve as the lead defense attorney for Timothy McVeigh in the criminal court case of United States of America v. Timothy James McVeigh and Terry Lynn Nichols. On April 19, 1995, two years to the day after the infamous Federal Bureau of Investigation and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms raid on the Branch Davidians at Waco, Texas, a homemade bomb delivered inside of a Ryder rental truck was detonated in front of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. Timothy McVeigh, as well as his accomplice Terry Nichols, were accused of and, in 1997, found guilty of the crime, and McVeigh was executed in 2001. Terry Nichols is still serving his sentence of 161 consecutive life terms without the possibility of parole in the ADX Florence super maximum-security prison in Florence, Colorado.
    [Show full text]
  • SAY NO to the LIBERAL MEDIA: CONSERVATIVES and CRITICISM of the NEWS MEDIA in the 1970S William Gillis Submitted to the Faculty
    SAY NO TO THE LIBERAL MEDIA: CONSERVATIVES AND CRITICISM OF THE NEWS MEDIA IN THE 1970S William Gillis Submitted to the faculty of the University Graduate School in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in the School of Journalism, Indiana University June 2013 ii Accepted by the Graduate Faculty, Indiana University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Doctoral Committee David Paul Nord, Ph.D. Mike Conway, Ph.D. Tony Fargo, Ph.D. Khalil Muhammad, Ph.D. May 10, 2013 iii Copyright © 2013 William Gillis iv Acknowledgments I would like to thank the helpful staff members at the Brigham Young University Harold B. Lee Library, the Detroit Public Library, Indiana University Libraries, the University of Kansas Kenneth Spencer Research Library, the University of Louisville Archives and Records Center, the University of Michigan Bentley Historical Library, the Wayne State University Walter P. Reuther Library, and the West Virginia State Archives and History Library. Since 2010 I have been employed as an editorial assistant at the Journal of American History, and I want to thank everyone at the Journal and the Organization of American Historians. I thank the following friends and colleagues: Jacob Groshek, Andrew J. Huebner, Michael Kapellas, Gerry Lanosga, J. Michael Lyons, Beth Marsh, Kevin Marsh, Eric Petenbrink, Sarah Rowley, and Cynthia Yaudes. I also thank the members of my dissertation committee: Mike Conway, Tony Fargo, and Khalil Muhammad. Simply put, my adviser and dissertation chair David Paul Nord has been great. Thanks, Dave. I would also like to thank my family, especially my parents, who have provided me with so much support in so many ways over the years.
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 OAH Annual Meeting • New York 1
    Welcome ear colleagues in history, welcome to the one-hundred-fi rst annual meeting of the Organiza- tion of American Historians in New York. Last year we met in our founding site of Minneap- Dolis-St. Paul, before that in the national capital of Washington, DC. On the present occasion wew meet in the world’s media capital, but in a very special way: this is a bridge-and-tunnel aff air, not limitedli to just the island of Manhattan. Bridges and tunnels connect the island to the larger metropolitan region. For a long time, the peoplep in Manhattan looked down on people from New Jersey and the “outer boroughs”— Brooklyn, theth Bronx, Queens, and Staten Island—who came to the island via those bridges and tunnels. Bridge- and-tunnela people were supposed to lack the sophistication and style of Manhattan people. Bridge- and-tunnela people also did the work: hard work, essential work, beautifully creative work. You will sees this work in sessions and tours extending beyond midtown Manhattan. Be sure not to miss, for example,e “From Mambo to Hip-Hop: Th e South Bronx Latin Music Tour” and the bus tour to my own Photo by Steve Miller Steve by Photo cityc of Newark, New Jersey. Not that this meeting is bridge-and-tunnel only. Th anks to the excellent, hard working program committee, chaired by Debo- rah Gray White, and the local arrangements committee, chaired by Mark Naison and Irma Watkins-Owens, you can chose from an abundance of off erings in and on historic Manhattan: in Harlem, the Cooper Union, Chinatown, the Center for Jewish History, the Brooklyn Historical Society, the New-York Historical Society, the American Folk Art Museum, and many other sites of great interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Alan Berkman Papers Pdf Finding
    Archives & Special Collections, Columbia University Health Sciences Library Alan Berkman Papers BERKMAN, ALAN Pape rs, circa 1960-2010 (bulk 1985-2000) 4 cubic feet (9 manuscript boxes, 1 re cord carton) #M-0019 BIOGRAPHICAL NOTE: Alan Berkman, physician, member of the Black Liberation Army and “Resistance Conspiracy Six,” convicted criminal, fugitive, prisoner and AIDS activist, was born September 4, 1945 in Brooklyn, the second of four children to father Samuel Berkman, and mother Mona. His family moved to Middletown, New York, where his father owned a plumbing and building supply company. He attended Cornell University (BA 1967) and the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University (MD 1971). He married physician Barbara Zeller and had two daughters, Sarah Machel (b. 1976) and Harriet Josina Clark (b. 1980). Berkman became radicalized as a medical student at Columbia University. One year after he enrolled in the College of Physicians & Surgeons, the Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) famously occupied Columbia’s Morningside Heights campus in protest of the University’s research ties to the Vietnam War and its relations with Harlem residents. Berkman claimed that his experience working with minority populations in poor communities awakened him to the class and racial divides he had been protected from as a white person growing up in Middletown, N.Y. He was also personally affected by hearing Kwame Toure (then Stokely Carmichael) speak about the Vietnam War. His commitment to fighting oppression is shown throughout his life’s work. In 1971, he treated prisoners injured during the Attica Prison riot in New York. In New York City, he interned at the North East Neighborhood Association (NENA) Community Health Center and the Betances Health Center, and was staff physician at Lincoln Hospital in the Bronx.
    [Show full text]
  • The Honorable Michael Mecaul 131 Cannon I-Louse 0111Cc Building
    ADVANCING FAITH, FAMILY AND FREEDOM JUI 27, 2015 The Honorable Michael MeCaul 131 Cannon I-louse 0111cc Building United Slates House of Representatives Washington. D.C. 20515 The 1-lonorabie Bennie Thompson 2466 Rayburn I-louse Office Building United Slates [louse of Representatives Washington, DC. 20515 Dear Representatives McCaul and Thompson: I ;ould like 10 thank you both and the Comrnftcee for the hard work you are doIrn! in atlcmpIin to assess and eliminate the terrorist threats our nation laces whether domestic or foreign. Your July 15 hearing. “The Rise of Radicalization: Is the US. Government Failing to Counter International rmd Domestic Terrorism,” prompted the filing of a letter into the record to which I must respond. lam speaking of a July 16 letter by Mr. Richard Cohen of the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) that attacks the organization for hich I am the executive vice-president, the Family Research Council (FRC). The letter is representative of the sort of work that the SPLC does best: attack and denunciation. One of America’s foremost experts on political extremism. Laird Wilcox.’ has said of the SPLC that it is an organization that has ‘specialized a highly developed and ritualized form of defamation..” In this instance, one merely has to examine the fourth paragraph of Mr. Cohen’s letier to see how the SPLC operates. His language is simply unhinged. The letter is unwonh of a Congressional committee We have addressed the issues raised by the 2 SPLC previously, but let it be noted that the FRC works regularly with religious and political leaders across America.
    [Show full text]
  • Palimpsest World: the Serpentine Trail of Roy Frankhouser from the SWP, the KKK, and the “Knights of Malta” to Far Beyond the Grassy Knoll1
    1 Palimpsest World: The Serpentine Trail of Roy Frankhouser from the SWP, the KKK, and the “Knights of Malta” to Far Beyond the Grassy Knoll1 Introduction In the summer of 1987 the National Caucus of Labor Committees (NCLC) submitted a document in a legal action that attempted to prove that Roy Frankhouser, a well-known KKK member and Lyndon LaRouche‘s longtime paid ―security consultant,‖ was highly connected inside the CIA. The document, ―Attachment 2,‖ began: During 1974-75, Roy Frankhauser [sic], claiming to be working on behalf of the CIA, established contact with the NCLC. In approximately June 1975, Frankhauser submitted to three days of intensive debriefings, during which time he provided details of his employment with the National Security Council on a special assignment to penetrate a Canada-based cell of the Palestinian terrorist Black September organization, and other aspects of his CIA career dating back to his involvement in the Bay of Pigs.2 Frankhauser said he served as the ―babysitter‖ for [Mario] Garcia- Kholy [sic], one of the Brigade leaders who was to have a high government post in a post-Castro Cuba.3 Subsequently, NCLC researchers found a brief reference in PRAVDA citing a 1962 expulsion of one ―R. Frankhauser‖ from a low-level post at the U.S. Embassy in Moscow on charges that he was spying.4 The NCLC reference to a ―R. Frankhauser‖ being in Moscow in 1962 as somehow relevant evidence that Roy E. Frankhouser was working for the CIA suggests just how much we have entered the Mad Hatter‘s World.
    [Show full text]
  • An Expert on Fringe Political Movements Reflects on the SPLC's
    Spring 2018 The Social Contract An Expert on Fringe Political Movements Reflects on the SPLC’s Political Agenda An exclusive interview with author and researcher Laird Wilcox INTRODUCTION aird Wilcox, founder of the Wilcox Collection on Contemporary Political Movements in the Kenneth Spencer LResearch Library at the University of Kansas, received a “Freedom of Information Award” for “outstanding commitment to intellectual freedom” from the Kansas Library Association, and the “H.L. Mencken Award” from the Free Press Association for “outstanding journalism in defense of liberty.” He is the author and co-author of several books and monographs, including Nazis, Communists, Klansmen, and Others on the Fringe: Political Extremism in America (Prometheus Books, 1992), Be Reasonable: Selected Quotations for Inquiring Minds (Prometheus Books, 1994), and American Extremists: Militias, Supremacists, Klansmen, Communists, and Others (Prometheus Books, 1996). Laird Wilcox was a member of the Carpenters Union for 20 years and had been a member of the American Civil Liberties Union for 50 years before resigning in protest over their abandonment of First Amendment advocacy; he was a member of Amnesty International since 1970 before resigning for the same reason. The Wilcox Collection of Contemporary Political Movements comprises more than 16,000 books, pamphlets, and periodicals, 800 audio tapes and DVDs, 210 linear feet of manuscript and materials, and more than 100,000 pieces of ephemera, including flyers, brochures, mailings, and clippings—much of the collection consists of primary source documents. Information about Laird Wilcox and his research can be found at www.lairdwilcox.com. Peter B. Gemma: The Wilcox Collection on Contemporary Political Movements is one of the largest resource centers for American political history in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • 375-Mihet-Declaration
    Case 2:12-cv-00184-wks Document 375 Filed 08/27/19 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF VERMONT ) JANET JENKINS, ET AL., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) Docket No. 2:12-cv-00184 v. ) ) KENNETH L. MILLER, ET AL., ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) DECLARATION OF HORATIO G. MIHET, ESQ. IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL HORATIO G. MIHET, being first duly sworn, deposes and states as follows: 1) I am over the age of 18, competent to testify to the matters herein, and, if called upon to testify, I could and would do so competently, based upon my personal knowledge, as follows: 2) I am Vice President of Legal Affairs and Chief Litigation Counsel for Liberty Counsel. I am one of the attorneys representing Liberty Counsel and Rena Lindevaldsen as defendants in this litigation. I was personally involved in searching for documents responsive to Jenkins’ discovery requests, as well as meet and confer attempts to request that Jenkins narrow some of her requests to make them reasonable and proportional to the needs of this case. A) The Protracted, Multi-Jurisdictional Jenkins-Miller Custody Litigation Has Produced A Gigantic Paper and Electronic File. 3) Beginning in 2004, Liberty Counsel attorneys, including Rena Lindevaldsen and Mathew Staver, represented Lisa Miller in protracted, multi-jurisdictional litigation against Janet Jenkins, in connection with their custody dispute over Isabella Miller (hereinafter the “Dispute.”). 1 Case 2:12-cv-00184-wks Document 375 Filed 08/27/19 Page 2 of 13 4) The Dispute was massive. It spanned multiple years (over five), two jurisdictions (Virginia and Vermont), and multiple courts within each jurisdiction at every level (trial, appellate and supreme courts).
    [Show full text]
  • Immigration and SPLC
    Center for Immigration Studies Backgrounder March 2010 Immigration and the SPLC How the Southern Poverty Law Center Invented a Smear, Served La Raza, Manipulated the Press, and Duped its Donors By Jerry Kammer Introduction This report examines the efforts by the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) to smear the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) and, by extension, the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) and NumbersUSA. With no serious analysis, the SPLC in late 2007 unilaterally labeled FAIR a “hate group.” That poisonous designation became the centerpiece of a “Stop the Hate” campaign launched by the National Council of La Raza (NCLR), also known as La Raza, to call on Congress and the media to exclude FAIR from the national debate on immigration. The campaign gathered strength as newspapers across the country reported that FAIR had been “designated a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center.” While the news stories generally included FAIR’s denial of the charge, thereby providing a semblance of balance, the designation’s taint lingered. The SPLC, presenting itself as a non-partisan, public-interest watchdog, never acknowledged — and no reporter ever disclosed — that the center was an active ally of the NCLR in the campaign. The evidence presented here demonstrates that the SPLC became a propaganda arm of the NCLR. The SPLC’s decision to smear FAIR was the work of a kangaroo court, one convened to reach a pre-determined verdict by inventing or distorting evidence. The “Stop the Hate” campaign would more accurately be labeled as a campaign to “Stop the Debate.” As this report notes, FAIR, CIS, and NumbersUSA have raised questions about the social, economic, and fiscal costs of the “comprehensive immigration reform” sought by La Raza and such allies as the National Immigration Forum and America’s Voice.
    [Show full text]
  • The Creation of a Public Identity For
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of the Liberal Arts PATRIOTS OR PARANOIDS? THE CREATION OF A PUBLIC IDENTITY FOR THE MODERN MILITIA MOVEMENT A Thesis in Speech Communication By Heather M. Norton Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2005 ii The thesis of Heather M. Norton was reviewed and approved* by the following: J. Michael Hogan Professor of Communication Arts and Sciences Thesis Advisor Chair of Committee Thomas W. Benson Professor of Speech Communication Edwin Erle Sparks Professor of Rhetoric Stephen H. Browne Professor of Communication Arts and Sciences John D. McCarthy Professor of Sociology James P. Dillard Professor of Communication Arts and Sciences Head, Department of Communication Arts and Sciences *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School. iii ABSTRACT The Oklahoma City bombing brought the modern Militia Movement to the forefront of the nation’s consciousness. After uncovering accused bomber Timothy McVeigh’s anti-government sentiments and his connections to the Michigan Militia, the federal government and the news media rushed to investigate the dangers posed by this movement—a movement that criticized the government for allegedly seeking to disarm law-abiding Americans and to limit their constitutional rights. The struggle that ensued over the public identity of the militias is the focus of this study. The study investigates the public debate over the militias beginning with the Oklahoma City bombing on April 19, 1995, and ending in 1996, when the militias disappeared from the headlines. Focusing on the “portraits” of the militias produced by the movement’s own leaders, so-called “watchdog” groups, and the Clinton administration, it examines how a variety of advocates worked to shape public perceptions of the movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Battling John Birch in California's Conservative Cradle
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Theses and Dissertations--History History 2015 Save Our Republic: Battling John Birch in California's Conservative Cradle James A. Savage University of Kentucky, [email protected] Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Savage, James A., "Save Our Republic: Battling John Birch in California's Conservative Cradle" (2015). Theses and Dissertations--History. 25. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/history_etds/25 This Doctoral Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the History at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations--History by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STUDENT AGREEMENT: I represent that my thesis or dissertation and abstract are my original work. Proper attribution has been given to all outside sources. I understand that I am solely responsible for obtaining any needed copyright permissions. I have obtained needed written permission statement(s) from the owner(s) of each third-party copyrighted matter to be included in my work, allowing electronic distribution (if such use is not permitted by the fair use doctrine) which will be submitted to UKnowledge as Additional File. I hereby grant to The University of Kentucky and its agents the irrevocable, non-exclusive, and royalty-free license to archive and make accessible my work in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I agree that the document mentioned above may be made available immediately for worldwide access unless an embargo applies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Militia Movement and American History
    Wilfrid Laurier University Scholars Commons @ Laurier History Faculty Publications History 2004 Conversing with the Dead: The Militia Movement and American History Darren Mulloy Wilfrid Laurier University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.wlu.ca/hist_faculty Recommended Citation Mulloy, Darren, "Conversing with the Dead: The Militia Movement and American History" (2004). History Faculty Publications. 1. https://scholars.wlu.ca/hist_faculty/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the History at Scholars Commons @ Laurier. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Scholars Commons @ Laurier. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Journal of American Studies, 38 (2004), 3, 439–456 f 2004 Cambridge University Press DOI: 10.1017/S0021875804008734 Printed in the United Kingdom Conversing with the Dead: The Militia Movement and American History DARREN MULLOY If one forgets the past, he will not be prepared for the future. The Militia of Montana YES! TODAY JUST AS YESTERDAY. The Michigan Militia When the militia movement emerged in the United States during the mid 1990s its members were widely seen as simply the latest practitioners of what Richard Hofstadter famously called ‘‘the paranoid style in American politics.’’1 There was much comfort to be had in this characterization. It fitted the militia movement into a long-standing model for understanding right-wing extremism in American life, one in which the principal characteristics of such extremism were readily understood: conspiratorial, Manichean, absolutist – if not apocalyptic – and, of course, paranoid. The problem with this ap- proach, though, is that it tends to discourage any examination of mainstream Darren Mulloy is Assistant Professor of US History at Wilfrid Laurier University, Canada.
    [Show full text]