DOCSLIB.ORG

Morris Dees Before the Founding of the Southern Poverty Law Center

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Morris Dees Before the Founding of the Southern Poverty Law Center James Madison University JMU Scholarly Commons Masters Theses The Graduate School Spring 2017 Assessing the reliability and accuracy of advocacy group data in hate group research Mark S. Purington James Madison University Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/master201019 Part of the Social Influence and Political Communication Commons Recommended Citation Purington, Mark S., "Assessing the reliability and accuracy of advocacy group data in hate group research" (2017). Masters Theses. 521. https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/master201019/521 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the The Graduate School at JMU Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of JMU Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Assessing the Reliability and Accuracy of Advocacy Group Data in Hate Group Research Mark S. Purington A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Writing, Rhetoric and Technical Communication May 2017 FACULTY COMMITTEE: Committee Chair: Traci Zimmerman, PhD Committee Members/ Readers: Sarah O’Connor S. Scott Lunsford, PhD Acknowledgments I have had the unique opportunity of pursuing both an undergraduate and graduate degree at James Madison University while employed in that institution’s Carrier Library. This paper marks the culmination of fifteen years of study, overall, and needless to say, I’ve had a lot of help along the way. I would like to thank my family, and my wife Sandra in particular, for their encouragement and patience during this fascinating adventure. Being a student, even part-time, consumes a lot of one’s free time, but my family has been extremely supportive from the very start. I would also like to thank the members of my thesis committee, Dr. Scott Lunsford, Ms. Sarah O’Connor, and Committee Chair Dr. Traci Zimmerman for agreeing to oversee this final project. Hate group research does not always lend itself to short, simple explanations and so I appreciate their willingness to review my scholarship and share their insights and advice on my work. Special thanks go to Ms. Cindy Allen for agreeing to be my much-needed editor, once again. I greatly appreciate her ability to bring order to the chaos of my written notes. None of this would have been possible if not for the administration of the Carrier Library, especially my managers, past and present, Daille Pettit, Judy Anderson, Cheri Duncan, Laura Drake Davis, and Grace Barth, for encouraging my studies, year after year. In particular, I wish to thank my very first manager at the library, Sharon Gasser, who first convinced a very skeptical 40-year-old that going back to college after a twenty-year hiatus was not only possible but entirely logical, all those years ago. ii Preface If the adage that “college teaches you how to think, not what to think” holds true, one would be hard-pressed to find a better test of this principle than the study of anti-racist advocacy groups. So much about the discussion of these advocacy groups and the alleged “hate groups” they purport to fight is heavily emotion- and value-laden, even within academia, where dispassionate objectivity in research is supposed to reign supreme. The result is that much of the data produced by these advocacy groups may lead the reader to predetermined conclusions, usually based on primal emotional reactions, which is also the primary mechanism behind classic propaganda. Higher education requires us utilize the intellectual methods which we have learned to examine evidence critically so that we may come to reasoned conclusions based on the facts over personal bias. My intent here is not to defend the words and actions of alleged “hate groups,” or at least not the content of such expression. My goal is to move beyond the emotional reflexivity that underlies much “hate group” research and to examine the fundamental structures behind it. What exactly is a “hate group”? Who are the “experts”? How accurate and reliable are the data produced by private advocacy groups, and how does the quality of those claims affect the academic research built around them? Because so much advocacy group data does find its way into our civic discourse, our academic research, and ultimately into our political debates, I feel that it is imperative to take a “trust, but verify” approach when examining all such claims. There are too many important civil rights issues at stake to simply accept the information without proper vetting and review. iii Table of Contents Acknowledgments............................................................................................................... ii Preface................................................................................................................................ iii List of Tables ..................................................................................................................... vi List of Figures ................................................................................................................... vii Abstract ............................................................................................................................ viii Assessing Advocacy Group Data in Hate Group Research ................................................ 1 On Propaganda .................................................................................................................... 3 Institute for Propaganda Analysis ....................................................................................... 5 The Seven Devices .............................................................................................................. 7 Getting Down to Basics: The Hate Group .......................................................................... 8 Morris Dees Before the Founding of the Southern Poverty Law Center .......................... 14 Founding the SPLC ........................................................................................................... 22 “Fighting Hate” ................................................................................................................. 27 Framing the Donald Case .................................................................................................. 30 “Bringing the Klan to its Knees” ...................................................................................... 32 Klan Trials as Fundraising Events .................................................................................... 37 First Amendment Issues .................................................................................................... 40 SPLC as Unbiased “Watchdog”........................................................................................ 44 The Montgomery Advertiser Series .................................................................................. 45 “No Blacks in Center’s Leadership” ................................................................................. 50 “Friendly Board” ............................................................................................................... 52 “A Very Rough Measure” ................................................................................................. 54 Laird Wilcox and the SPLC .............................................................................................. 58 “A Black Man in the White House” ................................................................................. 75 Recent Resurgence ............................................................................................................ 79 Hate Group Counts and the Media.................................................................................... 83 Hate Group Counts and Academic Researchers ............................................................... 92 Hate Group Counts and Law Enforcement ....................................................................... 97 The Threat to Civil Liberties........................................................................................... 102 The “Trump Effect” and the 2016 Presidential Election ................................................ 108 Ethical Issues .................................................................................................................. 119 Questionable Fundraising Practices ................................................................................ 121 iv Jacques Ellul on the Efficacy of Propaganda .................................................................. 128 Conclusions ..................................................................................................................... 132 List of References ........................................................................................................... 138 v List of Tables Table 1. SPLC Financial Information ………………………………………………...…48 Table 2. New Jersey Hate Group Count, 2015-2016…………………………………….65 Table 3. Free America Rally and White Boy Society Counts, 2015-2016.……………...66 Table 4. Aryan Terror Brigade Count, 2015-2016…………………………………...….67 Table 5. Georgia Militia Count, 2011……………………………………………………68 Table 6. Georgia Militia Count, 2012……………………………………………………69 vi List of Figures Figure 1. SPLC Hate Map ………………………………………………..……………..56 Figure 2. SPLC Hate Map for Virginia ……………………..…………………………..57 Figure 3. Wilcox Guides to the American
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The John M. Rezendes Ethics Essay Competition 2021 “One Vision
    The John M. Rezendes Ethics Essay Competition 2021 “One Vision, One Language”: Deconstructing Systemic Language Discrimination in the United States and an Ethical Perspective on the English Only Movement Stephanie Tillotson 22 Clipper Street Cumberland Foreside, Maine 04110 (704) 915-5284 [email protected] Spanish Class of 2023 1 “One Vision, One Language”: Deconstructing Systemic Language Discrimination in the United States and an Ethical Perspective on the English Only Movement While the United States is home to one of the most ethnically diverse populations in the world, it also embodies one of the most linguistically homogeneous.1 Many native English speakers may take for granted the extent to which their connection to a politically and economically dominant language grants them access to power that others do not enjoy. A 2019 U.S. Census Bureau survey on languages spoken at home shows that seventy-eight percent of the population speaks only English;2 English is known to be the globally dominant means of communication and trade, and it has also been proven that higher English proficiency and better economic performance go hand in hand.3 Native English speakers are typically monolingual,4 thriving under the impression that they don’t need to spend time learning another language because it seems unnecessary. While a monolingual way of life is not inherently harmful, it may give way to a mindset of English superiority, which does present grave ethical consequences for American society. English has been the de facto language of the United States since its founding, but has never enjoyed federal official status; however, in recent years, there has been a resurgence of a desire to declare English as the official language of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Jones (Stephen) Oklahoma City Bombing Archive, 1798 – 2003 (Bulk 1995 – 1997)
    JONES (STEPHEN) OKLAHOMA CITY BOMBING ARCHIVE, 1798 ± 2003 (BULK 1995 ± 1997). See TARO record at http://www.lib.utexas.edu/taro/utcah/03493/cah-03493.html (Approximately 620 linear feet) This collection is open for research use. Portions are restricted due to privacy concerns. See Archivist's Note for more details. Use of DAT and Beta tapes by appointment only; please contact repository for more information. This collection is stored remotely. Advance notice required for retrieval. Contact repository for retrieval. Cite as: Stephen Jones Oklahoma City Bombing Archive, 1798 ± 2003 (Bulk 1995 ± 1997), Dolph Briscoe Center for American History, University of Texas at Austin. [AR 98-395; 2003-055; 2005-161] ______________________________________________________________________________ BIOGRAPHICAL NOTE: Stephen Jones (born 1940) was appointed in May 1995 by the United States District Court in Oklahoma City to serve as the lead defense attorney for Timothy McVeigh in the criminal court case of United States of America v. Timothy James McVeigh and Terry Lynn Nichols. On April 19, 1995, two years to the day after the infamous Federal Bureau of Investigation and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms raid on the Branch Davidians at Waco, Texas, a homemade bomb delivered inside of a Ryder rental truck was detonated in front of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. Timothy McVeigh, as well as his accomplice Terry Nichols, were accused of and, in 1997, found guilty of the crime, and McVeigh was executed in 2001. Terry Nichols is still serving his sentence of 161 consecutive life terms without the possibility of parole in the ADX Florence super maximum-security prison in Florence, Colorado.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Annual Report a Message from Morris Dees and Richard Cohen
    2016 ANNUAL REPORT A MESSAGE FROM MORRIS DEES AND RICHARD COHEN WE REDOUBLED OUR WORK TO FIGHT HATE Anti-Muslim hate groups almost tripled in and seek justice in 2016, a year in which the pres- number – an increase fueled by Trump’s incen- idential campaign of Donald Trump energized a diary rhetoric, including his campaign pledge to growing white nationalist movement and engulfed bar Muslims from entering the United States. the country in a wave of xenophobia that threat- • Our Teaching Tolerance project reported a ened to reverse years of progress. In the face of ris- sharp uptick in the bullying and intimidation of ing far-right extremism, we fought for our coun- children whose races, nationalities or religions try’s highest ideals – exposing those who brought were targeted during the campaign. The Trump hate into the mainstream, helping teachers push Effect, based on our survey of 2,000 educators, back against bias in the classroom, and standing garnered national headlines and alerted the up in the courts for the exploited and the abused. country to the alarming trend. A second, post- Prior to the election, we documented the wide- election survey of more than 10,000 educators spread harassment and bullying of minority chil- reinforced the findings. We responded by pro- dren caused by a campaign that vilified their fami- viding teachers with strategies and resources lies on the basis of race, ethnicity or religion. And to help children see through stereotypes and after it, we alerted the country to an outbreak of reject bigotry. violence and intimidation faced by members of • After the election, we documented a spike in minority groups and the LGBT community.
    [Show full text]
  • SAY NO to the LIBERAL MEDIA: CONSERVATIVES and CRITICISM of the NEWS MEDIA in the 1970S William Gillis Submitted to the Faculty
    SAY NO TO THE LIBERAL MEDIA: CONSERVATIVES AND CRITICISM OF THE NEWS MEDIA IN THE 1970S William Gillis Submitted to the faculty of the University Graduate School in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in the School of Journalism, Indiana University June 2013 ii Accepted by the Graduate Faculty, Indiana University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Doctoral Committee David Paul Nord, Ph.D. Mike Conway, Ph.D. Tony Fargo, Ph.D. Khalil Muhammad, Ph.D. May 10, 2013 iii Copyright © 2013 William Gillis iv Acknowledgments I would like to thank the helpful staff members at the Brigham Young University Harold B. Lee Library, the Detroit Public Library, Indiana University Libraries, the University of Kansas Kenneth Spencer Research Library, the University of Louisville Archives and Records Center, the University of Michigan Bentley Historical Library, the Wayne State University Walter P. Reuther Library, and the West Virginia State Archives and History Library. Since 2010 I have been employed as an editorial assistant at the Journal of American History, and I want to thank everyone at the Journal and the Organization of American Historians. I thank the following friends and colleagues: Jacob Groshek, Andrew J. Huebner, Michael Kapellas, Gerry Lanosga, J. Michael Lyons, Beth Marsh, Kevin Marsh, Eric Petenbrink, Sarah Rowley, and Cynthia Yaudes. I also thank the members of my dissertation committee: Mike Conway, Tony Fargo, and Khalil Muhammad. Simply put, my adviser and dissertation chair David Paul Nord has been great. Thanks, Dave. I would also like to thank my family, especially my parents, who have provided me with so much support in so many ways over the years.
    [Show full text]
  • A True Deliverance: the Joan Little Case
    Michigan Law Review Volume 79 Issue 4 1981 A True Deliverance: The Joan Little Case Michigan Law Review Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Criminal Law Commons, Law and Gender Commons, and the Law and Race Commons Recommended Citation Michigan Law Review, A True Deliverance: The Joan Little Case, 79 MICH. L. REV. 861 (1981). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol79/iss4/34 This Review is brought to you for free and open access by the Michigan Law Review at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Michigan Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. March 1981] Equality and Women~ Rights 861 A TRUE DELIVERANCE: THE JOAN LITTLE CASE. By Fred Har­ well. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. 1980. Pp. x, 298. $10.95. During the early morning hours of August 27, 1974, Joan Little, a black prisoner at the Beaufort County Jail in North Carolina, stabbed to death a white male jailer and fled the prison. Little claimed that she had acted in self-defense when the jailer sexually assaulted her. The prosecutor claims that the prisoner had lured the jailer into the cell as part of an escape plot. Little's defense became a cause celebre, attracting support from advocates of women's rights, civil rights, and prison reform. Ultimately, the jury acquitted Little of murder. However, it is this book's thesis that because the defense "failed in court to prove that Joan Little was not guilty, just as [the 862 Michigan Law Review [Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Anti-Semitic Hate Crimes and Addressing the Security Needs of Jewish Communities a Practical Guide
    Understanding Anti-Semitic Hate Crimes and Addressing the Security Needs of Jewish Communities A Practical Guide ODIHR Understanding Anti-Semitic Hate Crimes and Addressing the Security Needs of Jewish Communities A Practical Guide Published by the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR) Ul. Miodowa 10 00-251 Warsaw Poland www.osce.org/odihr © OSCE/ODIHR 2017 All rights reserved. The contents of this publication may be freely used and copied for educational and other non-commercial purposes, provided that any such reproduction is accompanied by an acknowledgement of the OSCE/ ODIHR as the source. ISBN 978-92-9234-945-5 Cover designed by Nona Reuter Designed by Nona Reuter Printed in Poland by Poligrafus Jacek Adamiak Understanding Anti-Semitic Hate Crimes and Addressing the Security Needs of Jewish Communities A Practical Guide Acknowledgments ODIHR would like to express its gratitude to the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and the following individual experts, whose contributions were instrumental in the devel- opment of this guide: Rabbi Andrew Baker, Personal Representative of the OSCE Chairperson-in- Office on Combating Anti-Semitism, United States Stacy Burdett, Vice President, Government Relations, Advocacy & Community Engagement, Anti-Defamation League (ADL), United States Jakub Cygan, Main Specialist, Ministry of Internal Affairs and Administration, Poland Paul Giannasi, Head of the Cross-Government Hate Crime Programme, Ministry of Justice, United Kingdom Gabriela Jiraskova, Crisis Management Consultant, World Jewish Congress, Czech Republic Robin Sclafani, Director, CEJI – A Jewish Contribution to an Inclusive Europe, Belgium Michael Whine, Director, Government & International Affairs, Community Security Trust (CST), United Kingdom Contents Foreword vii Executive Summary ix Introduction 1 PART ONE: UNDERSTANDING THE CHALLENGE 5 I.
    [Show full text]
  • Nixon's Caribbean Milieu, 1950–1968
    Dark Quadrant: Organized Crime, Big Business, and the Corruption of American Democracy Online Appendix: Nixon’s Caribbean Milieu, 1950–1968 By Jonathan Marshall “Though his working life has been passed chiefly on the far shores of the continent, close by the Pacific and the Atlantic, some emotion always brings Richard Nixon back to the Caribbean waters off Key Biscayne and Florida.”—T. H. White, The Making of the President, 19681 Richard Nixon, like millions of other Americans, enjoyed Florida and the nearby islands of Cuba and the Bahamas as refuges where he could leave behind his many cares and inhibitions. But he also returned again and again to the region as an important ongoing source of political and financial support. In the process, the lax ethics of its shadier operators left its mark on his career. This Sunbelt frontier had long attracted more than its share of sleazy businessmen, promoters, and politicians who shared a get-rich-quick spirit. In Florida, hustlers made quick fortunes selling worthless land to gullible northerners and fleecing vacationers at illegal but wide-open gambling joints. Sheriffs and governors protected bookmakers and casino operators in return for campaign contributions and bribes. In nearby island nations, as described in chapter 4, dictators forged alliances with US mobsters to create havens for offshore gambling and to wield political influence in Washington. Nixon’s Caribbean milieu had roots in the mobster-infested Florida of the 1940s. He was introduced to that circle through banker and real estate investor Bebe Rebozo, lawyer Richard Danner, and Rep. George Smathers. Later this chapter will explore some of the diverse connections of this group by following the activities of Danner during the 1968 presidential campaign, as they touched on Nixon’s financial and political ties to Howard Hughes, the South Florida crime organization of Santo Trafficante, and mobbed-up hotels and casinos in Las Vegas and Miami.
    [Show full text]
  • Oregon's Anti-Immigrant Movement
    Oregon’s Anti-Immigrant Movement A resource from the Center for New Community ________________________________________________________________________ The recent wave of nativist ballot measures proposed in Oregon did not come out of nowhere. The statewide nativist group Oregonians for Immigration Reform (OFIR) has long been fostering relationships with state legislators and building a grassroots base, helping the national anti-immigrant movement gain a strong foothold in Oregon. Reporters and outlets planning to cover OFIR and their latest efforts should provide important context, including: Evidence of OFIR’s ideological extremism and fringe rhetoric OFIR’s links to national organizations that have hate group designations OFIR’s dependence on financial assistance from a notorious white nationalist Who Is OFIR? OFIR is by far one of the strongest state contact groups of the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), the flagship national anti-immigrant organization. FAIR is considered a hate group because of its roots in white nationalism and eugenics and its current day virulent and false attacks on immigrants. FAIR, and other anti-immigrant organizations connected to FAIR, have shown an increasing interest in using Oregon as a testing ground for state-wide anti-immigrant policies because of Oregon’s low barrier to qualify a ballot measure. This, coupled with OFIR’s strong relationships and coordination with legislators and grassroots activists, creates a unique situation for the anti-immigrant movement to advance far-right nativist measures in a conventional blue state. Nativist victories in Oregon can be used to build momentum for the anti-immigrant movement around the country. For instance, politicians and nativist leaders used the 2014 failure of Measure 88, which would have allowed undocumented Oregon residents to obtain driver licenses, to support legislation in Georgia that would block access to driver licenses to anyone with DACA or DAPA.
    [Show full text]
  • Klansville, U.S.A.: the Rise and Fall of the Civil Rights-Era Ku Klux Klan
    The UNC-Chapel Hill Journal of History David Cunningham. KLANSVILLE, U.S.A.: THE RISE AND FALL OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS-ERA KU KLUX KLAN. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. Reviewed by Evan Faulkenbury Travelers moving westward along Highway 70 near Smithfeld, North Carolina, in 1966 would have noticed a brightly painted billboard that boldly proclaimed: “You are in the Heart of Klan Country. Welcome to North Carolina. Help Fight Integration & Communism!” For some, the notice spelled welcome, but for others, it sent an ominous warning. Dozens of identical signs littered the state’s roads, simultaneously promoting the United Klans of America (UKA) and intimidating those who dared believe that the rights of citizenship extended beyond white Protestants. Whether in Smithfeld, Salisbury, Greensboro, or Goldsboro, UKA members proudly declared their state to be “Klansville, U.S.A.,” home to the largest and most active Ku Klux Klan in the country. Klansville, U.S.A.: Te Rise and Fall of the Civil Rights-Era Ku Klux Klan is an iconoclastic account of the Old North State during the mid-twentieth century. A sociologist at Brandeis University whose previous work revolves around federal counterintelligence of both the Klan and the New Lef, author David Cunningham exposes a dark underside of North Carolina, one that is far removed from the progressive bastion that politicians and business leaders led the nation to believe North Carolina to be. Te state housed a powerful terrorist organization that shaped local politics, united communities, and harassed African Americans, all while hiding in plain sight in a place known for its moderation among its Deep South brethren.
    [Show full text]
  • Retaliatory Hate Crime
    Bias Crime Offenders Session C Overview of the Session: At a Glance Presentation: Offender Typology 30 minutes Presentation: Organized Hate Groups 15 minutes Activity: Analysis of Three Video Segments 45 minutes TOTAL TIME 90 minutes Objectives By the end of this session, participants will be able to: • Describe the characteristics of three types of bias crime offenders • Give examples of retaliatory hate crimes and discuss the impor- tance of appropriate responses • Describe the characteristics of organized hate groups • Identify offender typology, given a case example Materials and Equipment Time: 90 minutes Videos: “That Old Gang of Mine” (interview with Eric, former skinhead), 1990 “On Hate Street,” 48 Hours, CBS, 1992 “Licensed to Kill,” Arthur Dong, Deepfocus Productions, 1997 (See page 56 for ordering information.) Handouts: Thrill-Seeking Offenders; Case Studies of Typical Offenders; Reactive Offenders; Mission Offenders; Offender Typology Video Observation Form Transparencies: Important of Understanding Offender Typology; Retaliatory Hate Crimes; Organized Hate Groups Equipment: Overhead projector; screen; VCR; monitor Session C. Bias Crime Offenders Instructor’s Notes I. Presentation: Offender Typology (30 minutes) Explain the following: • Jack Levin and Jack McDevitt of Northeastern University identified three different types of hate crime offenders in their book on bias crime, Hate Crime: The Rising Tide of Bigotry and Bloodshed: thrill-seeking offenders, reactive offenders, and mission offenders. • These are not necessarily
    [Show full text]
  • The Epic Courtroom Battle That Brought Down the Klan Pdf, Epub, Ebook
    THE LYNCHING: THE EPIC COURTROOM BATTLE THAT BROUGHT DOWN THE KLAN PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Laurence Leamer | 384 pages | 30 Jun 2016 | HarperCollins Publishers Inc | 9780062458346 | English | New York, United States The Lynching: The Epic Courtroom Battle That Brought Down the Klan PDF Book In March , members of Klavern of the United Klans of America pondered how to lash out against a jury that refused to find a black bank robber guilty of shooting a white police officer. Henry Francis Hays November 10, — June 6, was convicted of capital murder. Charging them with conspiracy, Dees put the Klan on trial, resulting in a verdict that would level a deadly blow to its organization. He doesn't understand the criminal justice system OR the civil justice system very well and he's abysmal at details. It may shed some light on the appeal of a certain kind of political machinations. Retrieved from Google News 96 of on March 3, Readers also enjoyed. The beginning of the book that covers the actual crime is especially powerful. The two Klansmen found nineteen-year-old Michael Donald walking home alone. For the most part, it's compelling. He has worked in a factory in France, a coal mine in West Virginia and as a Peace Corps volunteer in a remote village in Nepal two days from a road. February 6, Otherwise, this was a great book about a tragedy that should not have happened. It would be bad if we did. The prosecutor announced his intention to retry the case for a third time. This book is congratulatory over the "defeat" of racism by modern sensibilities even as racism and nationalism appear to be on the rise in America.
    [Show full text]
  • Jolene Unsoeld PDF.Indd
    JOLENE UNSOELD “Un-sold” www.sos.wa.gov/legacy who ARE we? | Washington’s Kaleidoscope Jolene addresses an anxious group of employees at Hoquiam Plywood Company in 1988 as the uncertainty over timber supplies intensifies. Kathy Quigg/The Daily World Introduction: “The Meddler” imber workers in her district were mad as hell over set- asides to protect the Northern Spotted Owl. Rush Lim- Tbaugh branded her a “feminazi.” Gun-control advocates called her a flip-flopper. It was the spring of 1994 and Con- gresswoman Jolene Unsoeld of Olympia was girding for the political fight of her life. CSPAN captured her in a bitter de- bate with abortion opponents. Dick Armey, Newt Gingrich’s sidekick, was standing tall in his armadillo-skin cowboy boots, railing against the “self-indulgent conduct” of women who had been “damned careless” with their bodies. As other Republi- cans piled on, Unsoeld’s neck reddened around her trademark pearl choker. Men just don’t get it, she shot back. “Reproductive health is at the very core of a woman’s existence. If you want to be brutally frank, what it compares with is if you had health- care plans that did not cover any illness related to testicles. I “Un-sold” 3 think the women of this country are being tolerant enough to allow you men to vote on this!” Julia Butler Hansen, one of Jolene’s predecessors repre- senting Washington’s complicated 3rd Congressional District, would have loved it. Brutally frank when provoked, Julia was married to a logger and could cuss like one.
    [Show full text]