DOCSLIB.ORG

Jerzdissertation.Pdf (5.247Mb)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Jerzdissertation.Pdf (5.247Mb) Geochemical Reactions in Unsaturated Mine Wastes Jeanette K. Jerz Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Geological Sciences Committee in charge: J. Donald Rimstidt, Chair James R. Craig W. Lee Daniels Patricia Dove D. Kirk Nordstrom April 22, 2002 Blacksburg, Virginia Keywords: Acid Mine Drainage, Pyrite, Oxidation Rate, Efflorescent Sulfate Salt, Paragenesis, Copyright 2002, Jeanette K. Jerz GEOCHEMICAL REACTIONS IN UNSATURATED MINE WASTES JEANETTE K. JERZ ABSTRACT Although mining is essential to life in our modern society, it generates huge amounts of waste that can lead to acid mine drainage (AMD). Most of these mine wastes occur as large piles that are open to the atmosphere so that air and water vapor can circulate through them. This study addresses the reactions and transformations of the minerals that occur in humid air in the pore spaces in the waste piles. The rate of pyrite oxidation in moist air was determined by measuring over time the change in pressure between a sealed chamber containing pyrite plus oxygen and a control. The experiments carried out at 25˚C, 96.8% fixed relative humidity, and oxygen partial pressures of 0.21, 0.61, and 1.00 showed that the rate of oxygen consumption is a function of oxygen partial pressure and time. The rates of oxygen consumption fit the expression dn −− O2 = 10 648...Pt 05 05. dt O2 It appears that the rate slows with time because a thin layer of ferrous sulfate + sulfuric acid solution grows on pyrite and retards oxygen transport to the pyrite surface. The transformation of efflorescent sulfate minerals (the reaction products of iron sulfide oxidation) from a pyrrhotite-rich massive sulfide is explained using a systematic analysis of their stoichiometry and thermodynamics. Their stabilities are controlled by oxygen partial pressure, relative humidity, and activity of sulfuric acid and can be visualized using logaa− log and logaa− log diagrams developed during OHO22 HSO24 HO 2 this study. Samples from the field site were analyzed in the laboratory to determine mineralogy, equilibrium relative humidity, chemical composition, and acid generation potential. Dissolution experiments showed that fibroferrite-rich samples had the highest acid producing potential, followed by copiapite-rich samples and then halotrichite-rich samples. The most abundant metals in solutions produced by dissolving the salts were magnesium, aluminum, zinc, copper, calcium, and lead. The molar concentrations of the metals varied with mineralogy. However, all of these minerals release metals and acid when they dissolve and therefore represent a significant environmental threat. iii “All Things are Poisonous and yet there is Nothing that is Poisonous; it is only the Dose that makes a Thing Poisonous” --P.A. Paracelsus iv GRANT INFORMATION This project was made possible by funding from the following: - The National Science Foundation (Grant EAR-0003364) - The Waste Policy Institute - The Department of Geological Sciences - The David Wones Geologic Scholarship Fund - The Graduate Student Assembly v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I would like to thank my advisor, Don Rimstidt, for his assistance, advice, and support during my Ph.D. Don has always been available to help me, not only with this project, but also with all other areas of my profession development. I will always be indebted to him for the time and attention he has given me. I would like also like to thank the other members of my committee: James Craig, Lee Daniels, Patricia Dove, and Kirk Nordstrom. Over the years, all of my committee members have provided me a great deal of technical assistance, scientific perspective, and personal guidance. I feel truly fortunate to have such a contributive and invaluable committee. In addition, I would like to thank several people who helped me with this project: - Dan Smith for building the Barcroft apparatus and stand and for generally contributing his skills and knowledge; - Heather Shannon for help in the field and lab, especially with the sulfate mineral relative humidity and acid production experiments; - Jane Hammarstrom and Nadine Piatak (USGS) and Ross Angel (VT) for help with identifying the sulfate minerals; - Rob Weaver for his time and microscopy skills; - Treavor Kendall and Steven Lower for analyzing my samples for bacteria and general discussions of microbes; - All the present and past faculty and graduate students of the Geochemistry Research Group (Don, Mike, Chris, Trish, Nancy, Ross, Maddy, John, Russ, Kevin, Jody, Barry, Eric, Steven, Rob, Erin, Treavor, Tracy, Stacy, Jackson, Andy, Collin, Kevin, Brenda, Mariano, and Darren), who have provided great amounts of scientific discourse and generally support during my tenure at Virginia Tech. vi I would also like to thank the faculty and staff of the Department of Geological Science at Virginia Tech for providing me with an excellent education and an opportunity to pursue my professional goals. Specifically, I am grateful to Cahit Coruh for his vision and leadership of the department while I was here. Also, I appreciate Linda Bland, Mary McMurry, Connie Lowe, Carolyn Williams for always being available and helpful and for making everything go as smoothly as possible. Finally I would like to thank my friends and family who have loved and supported me through out this project. Specifically, I would like to thank my Mom, Dad, brother Jim, and Jason; without them this never would have happened. vii TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract ..................................................................................................................................ii Grant Information ...................................................................................................................v Acknowledgements................................................................................................................vi Table of Contents.................................................................................................................viii List of Figures.........................................................................................................................x List of Tables.........................................................................................................................xi Chapter 1 : Introduction .........................................................................................................1 Chapter 2 : Pyrite oxidation in moist air ................................................................................1 Abstract ..................................................................................................................................1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................2 Materials and Methods............................................................................................................5 Reactor Design....................................................................................................................6 Experimental Procedure ......................................................................................................9 Rate calculation.................................................................................................................12 Results..................................................................................................................................14 Discussion ............................................................................................................................14 Data analysis.....................................................................................................................19 Comparison with other rates..............................................................................................27 Application of data............................................................................................................ 27 Conclusions ..........................................................................................................................31 Acknowledgements...............................................................................................................32 References ............................................................................................................................32 Appendix 1: Data from all Successful Experiments..............................................................38 Appendix 2: Pitzer Equations...............................................................................................43 Chapter 3 : Efflorescent iron sulfate minerals: Paragenesis, relative stability, and environmental impact................................46 Abstract ................................................................................................................................46 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................47 Name and Abbreviation ....................................................................................................49 Methods................................................................................................................................54 Field Methods ...................................................................................................................54
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download PDF About Minerals Sorted by Mineral Name
    MINERALS SORTED BY NAME Here is an alphabetical list of minerals discussed on this site. More information on and photographs of these minerals in Kentucky is available in the book “Rocks and Minerals of Kentucky” (Anderson, 1994). APATITE Crystal system: hexagonal. Fracture: conchoidal. Color: red, brown, white. Hardness: 5.0. Luster: opaque or semitransparent. Specific gravity: 3.1. Apatite, also called cellophane, occurs in peridotites in eastern and western Kentucky. A microcrystalline variety of collophane found in northern Woodford County is dark reddish brown, porous, and occurs in phosphatic beds, lenses, and nodules in the Tanglewood Member of the Lexington Limestone. Some fossils in the Tanglewood Member are coated with phosphate. Beds are generally very thin, but occasionally several feet thick. The Woodford County phosphate beds were mined during the early 1900s near Wallace, Ky. BARITE Crystal system: orthorhombic. Cleavage: often in groups of platy or tabular crystals. Color: usually white, but may be light shades of blue, brown, yellow, or red. Hardness: 3.0 to 3.5. Streak: white. Luster: vitreous to pearly. Specific gravity: 4.5. Tenacity: brittle. Uses: in heavy muds in oil-well drilling, to increase brilliance in the glass-making industry, as filler for paper, cosmetics, textiles, linoleum, rubber goods, paints. Barite generally occurs in a white massive variety (often appearing earthy when weathered), although some clear to bluish, bladed barite crystals have been observed in several vein deposits in central Kentucky, and commonly occurs as a solid solution series with celestite where barium and strontium can substitute for each other. Various nodular zones have been observed in Silurian–Devonian rocks in east-central Kentucky.
    [Show full text]
  • Beaverite- Ptumbojarosite Solid Solutions
    Carudian Mineralogist Vol. 2l,pp. l0l-ll3 (1983) BEAVERITE- PTUMBOJAROSITE SOLID SOLUTIONS J. L. JAMBOR eNn J. E. DUTRIZAC CANMET, 555 Booth Steet, Ottawa, Ontario KIA OGl ABSTRACT pens6es par substitution d'hydronium. Bien qge les min6raux du groupe de la jgLrositeuent c -17 A, In synthetic plumbojarosite, incorporation of une raie de diffraction e I I A, observ6e dans plu- significant Cu or Zn (or both) increases with in- sieurs'6chantillons synthdtiques et naturels, mais creasing concentrations of Cu2+ or Zrf+ in solution sans relation avec Ia composition, indique que and, to a lesser extent, with increasing Pb/Fet+ certaines notions courantes sur la jarosite sont i ratio. Replacement of Fe3+ by Znz+ is minor, but r6viser' the replacement by Cu2+ is sufficient to indicate (Traduit par la R6daction) that a compositional series probably extends from plumbojarosite Pb[Fe"(SOJ:(OH)"1, to beaverite Mots-clls: plumbojarosite, beaverite, osarizawaite, PbCuFer(SOJr(OH)e. In the synthetic series, the syntldse de jarosite, substitution (Fe, Cu) et atomic ratio Pb:(C\ f Zn) deviates from the ex- (Fe, Zn), solution solide plumbojarosite-beaverite. pected value l:1, and vacancies in R sites (involving Fe"+, Cu2+, Zn2+) are sornmon. Variations in cell parameters calculated from X-ray powder patterns INrnonuctroN show that c is related mainly to tbe amount of Cu2* that has replaced Fe3+; a is controlled princi- Metallurgical interest in beaverite PbCuFez pally by the proportions of Cu, Zn and Fe and the (SO4)r(OH)sand copper-zinc-bearing synthetic vacant R sites. Apparently significant deficiencies in plumbojarosite Pb[Fes(SO,),(OH)o],has increased alkali-site occupancy in jarosite partly may be com- recently as a result of the recognition that pensated by hydronium substitution.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Processing
    Mineral Processing Foundations of theory and practice of minerallurgy 1st English edition JAN DRZYMALA, C. Eng., Ph.D., D.Sc. Member of the Polish Mineral Processing Society Wroclaw University of Technology 2007 Translation: J. Drzymala, A. Swatek Reviewer: A. Luszczkiewicz Published as supplied by the author ©Copyright by Jan Drzymala, Wroclaw 2007 Computer typesetting: Danuta Szyszka Cover design: Danuta Szyszka Cover photo: Sebastian Bożek Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej Wybrzeze Wyspianskiego 27 50-370 Wroclaw Any part of this publication can be used in any form by any means provided that the usage is acknowledged by the citation: Drzymala, J., Mineral Processing, Foundations of theory and practice of minerallurgy, Oficyna Wydawnicza PWr., 2007, www.ig.pwr.wroc.pl/minproc ISBN 978-83-7493-362-9 Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................................9 Part I Introduction to mineral processing .....................................................................13 1. From the Big Bang to mineral processing................................................................14 1.1. The formation of matter ...................................................................................14 1.2. Elementary particles.........................................................................................16 1.3. Molecules .........................................................................................................18 1.4. Solids................................................................................................................19
    [Show full text]
  • Raman Spectroscopy of Efflorescent
    ASTROBIOLOGY Volume 13, Number 3, 2013 ª Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. DOI: 10.1089/ast.2012.0908 Raman Spectroscopy of Efflorescent Sulfate Salts from Iron Mountain Mine Superfund Site, California Pablo Sobron1 and Charles N. Alpers2 Abstract The Iron Mountain Mine Superfund Site near Redding, California, is a massive sulfide ore deposit that was mined for iron, silver, gold, copper, zinc, and pyrite intermittently for nearly 100 years. As a result, both water and air reached the sulfide deposits deep within the mountain, producing acid mine drainage consisting of sulfuric acid and heavy metals from the ore. Particularly, the drainage water from the Richmond Mine at Iron Mountain is among the most acidic waters naturally found on Earth. The mineralogy at Iron Mountain can serve as a proxy for understanding sulfate formation on Mars. Selected sulfate efflorescent salts from Iron Mountain, formed from extremely acidic waters via drainage from sulfide mining, have been characterized by means of Raman spectroscopy. Gypsum, ferricopiapite, copiapite, melanterite, coquimbite, and voltaite are found within the samples. This work has implications for Mars mineralogical and geochemical investigations as well as for terrestrial environmental investigations related to acid mine drainage contamination. Key Words: Acid mine drainage—Efflorescent sulfate minerals—Mars analogue—Iron Mountain—Laser Raman spectroscopy. Astro- biology 13, 270–278. 1. Introduction efflorescent sulfate minerals. This reconnaissance sampling resulted in characterization of the extremely acidic mine ron Mountain, California, is the host of massive sulfide waters (pH values from - 3.6 to + 0.5) and a variety of iron- Ideposits that were mined for copper, zinc, gold, silver, and sulfate efflorescent salts (Nordstrom and Alpers, 1999; pyrite (for sulfuric acid) between the early 1860s and the early Nordstrom et al., 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Azu Td Hy E9791 1968 43 Sip
    A study of crystallization from water of compounds in the system Fe² - Cu² - So₄². Item Type Thesis-Reproduction (electronic); text Authors Walton, Wayne J. A. Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 24/09/2021 05:15:43 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/191508 A STUDY OF CRYSTALLIZATION FROM WATER OF COMPOUNDS IN THE SYSTEM Fe -CU++ - SO4= by Wayne J. A. Walton, Jr. A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1968 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfill- ment of requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknow- ledginent of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author.
    [Show full text]
  • Efflorescent Iron Sulfate Minerals: Paragenesis, Relative Stability, and Environmental Impact
    American Mineralogist, Volume 88, pages 1919–1932, 2003 Efflorescent iron sulfate minerals: Paragenesis, relative stability, and environmental impact JEANETTE K. JERZ* AND J. DONALD RIMSTIDT Department of Geological Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, U.S.A. ABSTRACT This study of a pyrrhotite-dominated massive sulfide deposit in the Blue Ridge province in south- western Virginia shows that sulfate minerals formed by the oxidation of the pyrrhotite transform from one to another by a combination of oxidation, dehydration, and neutralization reactions. Significant quantities of sulfate minerals occur in the underground adits (Area I) and under overhangs along the high sidewall of the adjoining open pit (Area II). Samples from this site were analyzed to determine mineralogy, equilibrium relative humidity, chemical composition, and acid generation potential. In Area I, pyrrhotite oxidizes to marcasite + melanterite, which eventually oxidizes to melanterite + sul- furic acid. Melanterite is extruded from the rocks as a result of the volume change associated with this reaction. It accumulates in piles where halotrichite, copiapite, and fibroferrite form. In Area II, FeSO4 solutions produced by pyrrhotite oxidation migrate to the exposed pit face, where they evaporate to form melanterite. The melanterite rapidly dehydrates to form rozenite, which falls into a pile at the base of the wall, where melanterite, copiapite, and halotrichite are present. The observed paragenesis a a can be understood using a log O2 – log H2O diagram that we developed from published thermody- namic data and observations of coexisting phases. Dissolution experiments showed that fibroferrite-rich samples had the highest acid producing po- tential, followed by copiapite-rich samples and then halotrichite-rich samples.
    [Show full text]
  • Italian Type Minerals / Marco E
    THE AUTHORS This book describes one by one all the 264 mi- neral species first discovered in Italy, from 1546 Marco E. Ciriotti was born in Calosso (Asti) in 1945. up to the end of 2008. Moreover, 28 minerals He is an amateur mineralogist-crystallographer, a discovered elsewhere and named after Italian “grouper”, and a systematic collector. He gradua- individuals and institutions are included in a pa- ted in Natural Sciences but pursued his career in the rallel section. Both chapters are alphabetically industrial business until 2000 when, being General TALIAN YPE INERALS I T M arranged. The two catalogues are preceded by Manager, he retired. Then time had come to finally devote himself to his a short presentation which includes some bits of main interest and passion: mineral collecting and information about how the volume is organized related studies. He was the promoter and is now the and subdivided, besides providing some other President of the AMI (Italian Micromineralogical As- more general news. For each mineral all basic sociation), Associate Editor of Micro (the AMI maga- data (chemical formula, space group symmetry, zine), and fellow of many organizations and mine- type locality, general appearance of the species, ralogical associations. He is the author of papers on main geologic occurrences, curiosities, referen- topological, structural and general mineralogy, and of a mineral classification. He was awarded the “Mi- ces, etc.) are included in a full page, together cromounters’ Hall of Fame” 2008 prize. Etymology, with one or more high quality colour photogra- geoanthropology, music, and modern ballet are his phs from both private and museum collections, other keen interests.
    [Show full text]
  • Alunogen Al2(SO4)3 • 17H2O C 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, Version 1
    Alunogen Al2(SO4)3 • 17H2O c 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, version 1 Crystal Data: Triclinic. Point Group: 1. Crystals rare, as thin plates or prismatic [001] or {010} with a six-sided outline about [010], very complex, with about 60 forms noted. Commonly fibrous, to 5 mm, forming delicate masses, crusts, and efflorescences. Twinning: On {010}. Physical Properties: Cleavage: {010}, perfect; probable on {100} and {313}. Hardness = 1.5–2 D(meas.) = 1.72–1.77 D(calc.) = 1.79 Soluble in H2O; taste alumlike, acid and sharp. Optical Properties: Transparent. Color: Colorless in crystals, aggregates white, or pale yellow or red from impurities; colorless in transmitted light. Luster: Vitreous to silky. Optical Class: Biaxial (+). Orientation: X ' b; Z ∧ c =42◦. α = 1.459–1.475 β = 1.461–1.478 γ = 1.470–1.485 2V(meas.) = 31◦ Cell Data: Space Group: P 1. a = 7.420(6) b = 26.97(2) c = 6.062(5) α =89◦57(5)0 β =97◦34(5)0 γ =91◦53(5)0 Z=2 X-ray Powder Pattern: Nov´aBaˇna, Slovakia. 4.489 (100), 4.390 (81), 3.969 (81), 4.329 (76), 13.46 (54), 3.897 (52), 3.675 (45) Chemistry: (1) (2) SO3 37.74 37.04 Al2O3 16.59 15.73 H2O 44.64 47.23 insol. 0.94 Total 99.91 100.00 • (1) Pintado Canyon, Guadalupe Co., New Mexico, USA. (2) Al2(SO4)3 17H2O. Occurrence: Forms by reaction of sulfates from decomposing sulfides with aluminous minerals in shales and slates; in gossan or altered wall rock of pyritic deposits in arid regions; in coal seams; in relatively low-temperature fumaroles.
    [Show full text]
  • New Insights on Secondary Minerals from Italian Sulfuric Acid Caves Ilenia M
    International Journal of Speleology 47 (3) 271-291 Tampa, FL (USA) September 2018 Available online at scholarcommons.usf.edu/ijs International Journal of Speleology Off icial Journal of Union Internationale de Spéléologie New insights on secondary minerals from Italian sulfuric acid caves Ilenia M. D’Angeli1*, Cristina Carbone2, Maria Nagostinis1, Mario Parise3, Marco Vattano4, Giuliana Madonia4, and Jo De Waele1 1Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, University of Bologna, Via Zamboni 67, 40126 Bologna, Italy 2DISTAV, Department of Geological, Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Genoa, Corso Europa 26, 16132 Genova, Italy 3Department of Geological and Environmental Sciences, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Piazza Umberto I 1, 70121 Bari, Italy 4Department of Earth and Marine Sciences, University of Palermo, Via Archirafi 22, 90123 Palermo, Italy Abstract: Sulfuric acid minerals are important clues to identify the speleogenetic phases of hypogene caves. Italy hosts ~25% of the known worldwide sulfuric acid speleogenetic (SAS) systems, including the famous well-studied Frasassi, Monte Cucco, and Acquasanta Terme caves. Nevertheless, other underground environments have been analyzed, and interesting mineralogical assemblages were found associated with peculiar geomorphological features such as cupolas, replacement pockets, feeders, sulfuric notches, and sub-horizontal levels. In this paper, we focused on 15 cave systems located along the Apennine Chain, in Apulia, in Sicily, and in Sardinia, where copious SAS minerals were observed. Some of the studied systems (e.g., Porretta Terme, Capo Palinuro, Cassano allo Ionio, Cerchiara di Calabria, Santa Cesarea Terme) are still active, and mainly used as spas for human treatments. The most interesting and diversified mineralogical associations have been documented in Monte Cucco (Umbria) and Cavallone-Bove (Abruzzo) caves, in which the common gypsum is associated with alunite-jarosite minerals, but also with baryte, celestine, fluorite, and authigenic rutile-ilmenite-titanite.
    [Show full text]
  • Alphabetical List
    LIST L - MINERALS - ALPHABETICAL LIST Specific mineral Group name Specific mineral Group name acanthite sulfides asbolite oxides accessory minerals astrophyllite chain silicates actinolite clinoamphibole atacamite chlorides adamite arsenates augite clinopyroxene adularia alkali feldspar austinite arsenates aegirine clinopyroxene autunite phosphates aegirine-augite clinopyroxene awaruite alloys aenigmatite aenigmatite group axinite group sorosilicates aeschynite niobates azurite carbonates agate silica minerals babingtonite rhodonite group aikinite sulfides baddeleyite oxides akaganeite oxides barbosalite phosphates akermanite melilite group barite sulfates alabandite sulfides barium feldspar feldspar group alabaster barium silicates silicates albite plagioclase barylite sorosilicates alexandrite oxides bassanite sulfates allanite epidote group bastnaesite carbonates and fluorides alloclasite sulfides bavenite chain silicates allophane clay minerals bayerite oxides almandine garnet group beidellite clay minerals alpha quartz silica minerals beraunite phosphates alstonite carbonates berndtite sulfides altaite tellurides berryite sulfosalts alum sulfates berthierine serpentine group aluminum hydroxides oxides bertrandite sorosilicates aluminum oxides oxides beryl ring silicates alumohydrocalcite carbonates betafite niobates and tantalates alunite sulfates betekhtinite sulfides amazonite alkali feldspar beudantite arsenates and sulfates amber organic minerals bideauxite chlorides and fluorides amblygonite phosphates biotite mica group amethyst
    [Show full text]
  • Minerals Found in Michigan Listed by County
    Michigan Minerals Listed by Mineral Name Based on MI DEQ GSD Bulletin 6 “Mineralogy of Michigan” Actinolite, Dickinson, Gogebic, Gratiot, and Anthonyite, Houghton County Marquette counties Anthophyllite, Dickinson, and Marquette counties Aegirinaugite, Marquette County Antigorite, Dickinson, and Marquette counties Aegirine, Marquette County Apatite, Baraga, Dickinson, Houghton, Iron, Albite, Dickinson, Gratiot, Houghton, Keweenaw, Kalkaska, Keweenaw, Marquette, and Monroe and Marquette counties counties Algodonite, Baraga, Houghton, Keweenaw, and Aphrosiderite, Gogebic, Iron, and Marquette Ontonagon counties counties Allanite, Gogebic, Iron, and Marquette counties Apophyllite, Houghton, and Keweenaw counties Almandite, Dickinson, Keweenaw, and Marquette Aragonite, Gogebic, Iron, Jackson, Marquette, and counties Monroe counties Alunite, Iron County Arsenopyrite, Marquette, and Menominee counties Analcite, Houghton, Keweenaw, and Ontonagon counties Atacamite, Houghton, Keweenaw, and Ontonagon counties Anatase, Gratiot, Houghton, Keweenaw, Marquette, and Ontonagon counties Augite, Dickinson, Genesee, Gratiot, Houghton, Iron, Keweenaw, Marquette, and Ontonagon counties Andalusite, Iron, and Marquette counties Awarurite, Marquette County Andesine, Keweenaw County Axinite, Gogebic, and Marquette counties Andradite, Dickinson County Azurite, Dickinson, Keweenaw, Marquette, and Anglesite, Marquette County Ontonagon counties Anhydrite, Bay, Berrien, Gratiot, Houghton, Babingtonite, Keweenaw County Isabella, Kalamazoo, Kent, Keweenaw, Macomb, Manistee,
    [Show full text]
  • Pyrite Oxidation: a State-Of-The-Art Assessment of the Reaction Mechanism
    Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, Vol. 67, No. 5, pp. 873–880, 2003 Copyright © 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd Pergamon Printed in the USA. All rights reserved 0016-7037/03 $30.00 ϩ .00 doi:10.1016/S0016-7037(02)01165-1 Pyrite oxidation: A state-of-the-art assessment of the reaction mechanism 1, 2, J. DONALD RIMSTIDT * and DAVID J. VAUGHAN 1Department of Geological Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA 2Department of Earth Sciences and Williamson Research Centre for Molecular Environmental Science, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK (Received October 29, 2001; accepted in revised form August 20, 2002) Abstract—The oxidation of pyrite to release ferrous iron and sulfate ions to solution involves the transfer of seven electrons from each sulfur atom in the mineral to an aqueous oxidant. Because only one or, at most, two electrons can be transferred at a time, the overall oxidation process is quite complex. Furthermore, pyrite is a semiconductor, so the electrons are transferred from sulfur atoms at an anodic site, where oxygen atoms from water molecules attach to the sulfur atoms to form sulfoxy species, through the crystal to cathodic Fe(II) sites, where they are acquired by the oxidant species. The reaction at the cathodic sites is the rate-determining step for the overall process. This paper maps out the most important steps in this overall process. Copyright © 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd 1. INTRODUCTION particular pyrite sample or even the zone or region of a partic- ular sample. Thus, as further discussed below, subtle differ- The oxidation of pyrite, the most abundant of all metal ences in stoichiometry influence electrical properties and may sulfide minerals, is the dominant process giving rise to the in turn significantly affect reactivity.
    [Show full text]