DOCSLIB.ORG

Historical Archaeology and the Importance of Material Things

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Historical Archaeology and the Importance of Material Things HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY AND THE IMPORTANCE OF MATERIAL THINGS LELAND FERGUSON, Editor r .\ SPECIAL PUBLICATION SERIES, NUMBER 2 Society for Historical Archaeology Special Publication Series, Number 2 published by The Society for Historical Archaeology The painting on the cover of this volume was adapted from the cover of the 1897 Sears Roebuck Catalogue, publishedby Chelsea House Publishers, New York, New York, 1968. The Society for Historical Archaeology OFFICERS RODERICK SPRAGUE, University ofIdaho President JAMES E. AYRES, Arizona State Museum President-elect JERVIS D. SWANNACK, Canadian National Historic Parks & Sites Branch Past president MICHAEL J. RODEFFER, Ninety Six Historic Site Secretary-treasurer JOHN D. COMBES, Parks Canada ,,,, , , Editor LESTER A. Ross, Canadian National Historic Parks & Sites Branch Newsletter Editor DIRECTORS 1977 KATHLEEN GILMORE, North Texas State University LEE H. HANSON, Fort Stanwix National Monument 1978 KARLIS KARKINS, Canadian National Parks & Sites Branch GEORGE QUIMBY, University ofWashington 1979 JAMES E.. FITTING, Commonwealth Associates,Inc. DEE ANN STORY, Balcones Research Center EDITORIAL STAFF JOHN D. COMBES ,, Editor Parks Canada, Prairie Region, 114 Garry Street, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3C IGI SUSAN JACKSON Associate Editor Institute of Archeology and Anthropology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina 29208 JOHN L. COITER Recent Publications Editor National Park Service, 143South Third Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106 WILLIAM D. HERSHEY , , Recent Publications Editor Temple University, Broad and Ontario, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122 KATHLEEN GILMORE. ....................................................... .. Book Review Editor Institute for Environmental Studies, North Texas State University, Denton, Texas 76201 LESTER A. Ross Newsletter Editor National Historic Parks & Sites Branch, 1600Liverpool Court, Ottawa, Ontario, KIA OH4 R. DARBY ERD Art Institute of Archeology and Anthropology, University of South Carolina. Columbia, South Carolina 29208 EDITORIAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE JOHN D. COMBES, Parks Canada, Chairman IVOR NOEL HUME, Colonial Williamsburg PAUL J. F. SCHUMAKER, Adan E. Treganza Museum STANLEY SOUTH, Institute ofArcheology and Anthropology Historical Archaeology and the Importance of Material Things HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY AND THE IMPORTANCE OF MATERIAL THINGS Papers ofthe Thematic Symposium, Eighth Annual Meeting ofthe Society for Historical Archaeology, Charleston, South Carolina, January 7-11,1975 edited by Leland Ferguson Special Publication Series, Number 2 published by The Society for Historical Archaeology John D. Combes, editor © 1977 by The Society for Historical Archaeology Historical Archaeology-Is It Historical or Archaeological? by Lewis R. Binford was previously printed in PopularArchaeology Vol. 4, no. 3-40. Contents Foreword I Stanley South Preface 3 Leland Ferguson Historical Archaeology and the Importance of Material Things 5 Leland Ferguson Material Culture and Archaeology-What's the Difference? 9 James Deetz Historical Archaeology-Is It Historical or Archaeological? 13 Lewis R. Binford Archaeology and Folklore: Common Anxieties, Common Hopes 23 Henry Glassie In Praise of Archaeology: Le Proiet du Garbage 36 William L. Rathje The New Mormon Temple in Washington, D.C. 43 Mark P. Leone The Structure of Historical Archaeology and the Importance of Material Things 62 James E. Fitting Foreword WHEN ROBERT L. STEPHENSON, host and final day of the conference. However, Leland general chairman for the eighth annual meeting Ferguson, whom I had asked to chair the of the Society for Historical Archaeology, asked thematic presentation, had a far better idea, that I act as program chairman for the Charles­ pointing out that a session hailed as exploring ton event, I welcomed the opportunity. He theoretical concepts would likelybe attended by knew of my concern and disappointment in the very few, whereas one dealing with the impor­ fact that the seven previous meetings of the tance of material things would attract a far wider Society for Historical Archaeology had focused audience. To insure as wide an audience as on historical-descriptive, particularistic topics, possible, including those who normally might with little concern shown for the idea-sets under be reluctant to attend a nondescriptive session, which such topics were explored. I saw this as an the thematic session was not concurrent with opportunity likelyto arise but once in a decade, another session. Our concern over a lack of to structure an SHA program around the belief support for such an idea session was at that system under which archaeology is undertaken, point a reflection of our awareness of the de­ rather than around the data base addressed by velopmental background of historical archae­ that faith. ology, and our recognition that the field was not I envisioned a thematic framework emphasiz­ traditionally oriented to the testing of ideas. We ing theory on the first day, method on the sec­ had not yet discussed the session in terms of the ond day, and the usual descriptive papers on the participants, and as it turned out, those who Foreword agreed to join Leland in an examination of the The rare happening recognized here in this spe­ importance of material things brought to the cial volume by the Board of Directors of the session credentials enough to insure a full au­ Society for Historical Archaeology and its ditorium under any conditions. Our fears re­ editor, John D. Combes, is seen as a pivotal garding the reception of such a session are re­ event in historical archaeology. The Society for corded here as a matter of historical record Historical Archaeology is indebted to special monitoring attitudes present in January 1975. volume editor, Leland G. Ferguson, and pro­ The strategy we had was that ifwe could bring duction editor, Susan Jackson, for seeing this together in one room an idea-set composed of work to press. Leland G. Ferguson, David L. Clarke, Lewis R. It is difficult to say when another such event Binford, Henry Glassie, James Deetz, William as the Charleston meeting will come about, Rathje, Mark Leone, and James Fitting, each given the depth to which particularism is en­ bringing his own vibrant concepts, that some­ demic in historical archaeology. However, a thing might happen similar to when drops of revolution in thought is underway in the field, mercury are brought close together; a sudden and its seeds are clearly seen in these papers. coalescence might occur to produce a result From such conceptual roots a new vitality will larger than any of the parts. Those who at­ evolve in the decades to come through the pro­ tended the Charleston meeting are well aware cess of exploring and testing our ideas about the that such a happening did occur. past. As the reader enjoys the enclosed papers of Stanley South Ferguson and his colleagues, an awareness of Institute of Archeology the importance of the Charleston meeting will and Anthropology begin to emerge in the image of the future of University of South Carolina historical archaeology that these papers mirror. 2 Preface IN THE SPRING OF 1974 when Stanley South, were convinced that there was a special value to program chairman for the 1975 meeting of the be gained by studying the things people create. Society for Historical Archaeology, asked me to With this approach we felt that the variety of develop a thematic symposium on theory for people attending the meetings would feel an the meeting we were both excited. Our excite­ affinity to the thematic symposium. There ment stemmed from the opportunity of plan­ would be room for those of us religiously in­ ning a general session for such a large group of volved with science, for those who were histori­ archaeologists who dealt with historic sites. cal particularists, for the humanist in us all and However, my excitement was somewhat curbed for the structuralists. The structuralists? by apprehension. Sessions on "theory" were When this symposium was conceived there often stilted and polemic. They often proved were no archaeologists that I knew of who were divisive. The ideal, I thought, was a session that seriously involved with structuralism as an drew the variety of interests in the Society into analytical approach to archaeology, True, an atmosphere of constructive interaction. The James Dectz had alluded to a kind of structural solution? We decided to have a symposium that approach in his introductory book, Invitation would stress the most common interest of all to Archaeology. Yet, no archaeologists had ever archaeologists-material things. We would in­ used and published a structural analysis. vite people, who regardless of their philosophy Nevertheless, when the symposium occurred 3 Preface and we all reflected on what had happened, we and cogent, and I sincerely thank him for ac­ realized that three of the sixinvited participants cepting and completing this difficult task. explicitlyacknowledged the value of a structural In concluding these prefatory remarks I approach to archaeological materials. Indeed, would like to thank several people. Stanley Mark Leone's paper was a seminal structural South's inspiration and encouragement are di­ analysis of a significant piece of American ar­ rectly responsible for the existence of this vol­ chitecture. Subsequent to the symposium, ume. He and John Combes were instrumental Henry Glassie has published a structural in securing the necessary funds from the state of analysis of eighteenth century houses
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The SAA Archaeological Record (ISSN 1532-7299) Is Published five Times a Year Andrew Duff and Is Edited by Andrew Duff
    the archaeologicalrecord SAA SEPTEMBER 2007 • VOLUME 7 • NUMBER 4 SOCIETY FOR AMERICAN ARCHAEOLOGY the SAAarchaeologicalrecord The Magazine of the Society for American Archaeology Volume 7, No. 4 September 2007 Editor’s Corner 2 Andrew Duff Letters to the Editor 3 From the President 6 Dean R. Snow In Brief 7 Tobi A. Brimsek Archaeopolitics 8 Dan Sandweiss and David Lindsay Probing during cemetery Vancouver in 2008 9 Dana Lepofsky, Sue Rowley, delineation in Coweta Andrew Martindale, County, Georgia. and Alan McMillan Photo by Ron Hobgood. RPA: The Issue of Commercialism: Proposed Changes 10 Jeffrey H. Altschul to the Register’s Code of Conduct Archaeology’s High Society Blues: Reply to McGimsey 11 Lawrence E. Moore Amerind-SAA Seminars: A Progress Report 15 John A. Ware Email X and the Quito Airport Archaeology 20 Douglas C. Comer Controversy: A Cautionary Tale for Scholars in the Age of Rapid Information Flow Identifying the Geographic Locations 24 German Loffler in Need of More CRM Training Can the Dissertation Be All Things to All People? 29 John D. Rissetto Networks: Historic Preservation Learning Portal: 33 Richard C. Waldbauer, Constance Werner Ramirez, A Performance Support Project for and Dan Buan Cultural Resource Managers Interfaces: 12V 35 Harold L. Dibble, Shannon J.P. McPherron, and Thomas McPherron Heritage Planning 42 Yun Shun Susie Chung In Memoriam: Jaime Litvak King 47 Emily McClung de Tapia and Paul Schmidt Calls for Awards Nominations 48 positions open 52 news and notes 54 calendar 56 EDITOR’S CORNER the SAAarchaeologicalrecord The Magazine of the Society for American Archaeology Volume 7, No.
    [Show full text]
  • Courage and Thoughtful Scholarship = Indigenous Archaeology Partnerships
    FORUM COURAGE AND THOUGHTFUL SCHOLARSHIP = INDIGENOUS ARCHAEOLOGY PARTNERSHIPS Dale R. eroes Robert McGhee's recent lead-in American Antiquity article entitled Aboriginalism and Problems of Indigenous archaeology seems to emphasize the pitfalls that can occur in "indige nolls archaeology." Though the effort is l1ever easy, I would empha­ size an approach based on a 50/50 partnership between the archaeological scientist and the native people whose past we are attempting to study through our field alld research techniques. In northwestern North America, we have found this approach important in sharillg ownership of the scientist/tribal effort, and, equally important, in adding highly significant (scientif­ ically) cullUral knowledge ofTribal members through their ongoing cultural transmission-a concept basic to our explana­ tion in the field of archaeology and anthropology. Our work with ancient basketry and other wood and fiber artifacts from waterlogged Northwest Coast sites demonstrates millennia ofcultl/ral cOlltinuity, often including reg ionally distinctive, highly guarded cultural styles or techniques that tribal members continue to use. A 50/50 partnership means, and allows, joint ownership that can only expand the scientific description and the cultural explanation through an Indigenous archaeology approach. El artIculo reciente de Robert McGhee en la revista American Antiquity, titulado: Aborigenismo y los problemas de la Arque­ ologia Indigenista, pC/recen enfatizar las dificultades que pueden ocurrir en la "arqueologfa indigenista
    [Show full text]
  • THE HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY of NATIVE AMERICANS Patricia E
    P1: FBH August 28, 2000 9:45 Annual Reviews AR111-16 Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 2000. 29:425–46 Copyright c 2000 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved THE HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY OF NATIVE AMERICANS Patricia E. Rubertone Department of Anthropology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912; e-mail: Patricia [email protected] Key Words acculturation, direct-historical approaches, landscapes, multicultural communities, colonialism ■ Abstract Historical archaeologists have given relatively scant attention to the study of Native Americans. Despite the potential to contribute to new understandings about Native peoples during and after European contact, the research commitment has been ambivalent at best. In this review, I ground this relationship in early debates about the field’s subject matter and concurrent discussions in anthropology about direct- historical and acculturation models. In addition, I highlight currents in research that have refined these approaches as well as those that have charted new directions. The latter are notable for helping comprehend the role of place and tradition in Native peoples’ lives, but also for reminding us of the complexities of identity construction in America after European contact. I reason that historical archaeology’s use of multiple sources, if linked creatively, can be crucial in producing knowledge about the past that illuminates the rich diversity of experiences among Native Americans. “Did these occurrences have a paradigm ... that went back in time? Or are we working out the minor details of a strictly random pattern?” Erdrich (1998:240) “...all of us remembering what we have heard together—that creates the whole story the long story of the people.” Silko (1981:7) INTRODUCTION Today, definitions of what constitutes historical archaeology are more broadly conceived than ever before.
    [Show full text]
  • Society for Historical Archaeology
    Historical Archaeology Volume 46, Number 42 2012 Journal of The Society for Historical Archaeology J. W. JOSEPH, Editor New South Associates, Inc. 6150 East Ponce de Leon Avenue Stone Mountain, Georgia 30083 InN assocASSOCIATIONIatIon wWITHIth aRudreyEBECCA h ornALLENIng,, JcAMIEhrIs BMRANDONatthews, ,C MHRISargaret MATTHEWS Purser, , andPAUL g MraceULLINS ZIes, DIngELLA, a ssocSCOTTIate-I RETONedItors, B; RENT WEISMAN, GRACE ZEISING, rASSOCIATEIchard V eEItDITORS, reVIews; CHARLES edItor ;E MWENary, RBEVIEWSeth reed EDITOR, co;- eMdARYItor BETH REED, CO-EDITOR Published by THE SOCIETY FOR HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY Front Matter - 46(2) for print.indd i 9/7/12 9:28 AM HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY IS INDEXED IN THE FOLLOWING PUBLICATIONS: ABSTRACTS OF ANTHROPOLOGY; AMERICA: HISTORY AND LIFE; ANTHROPOLOGICAL LITERATURE; ART AND ARCHAEOLOGY TECHNICAL ABSTRACTS; ARTS AND HUMANITIES INDEX; BRITISH ARCHAEOLOGICAL ABSTRACTS; CURRENT CONTENTS/ ARTS AND HUMANITIES; HISTORICAL ABSTRACTS; HUMANITIES INDEX; AND INTERNATIONAL BIBLIOGRAPHY OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCES. Copyediting by Richard G. Schaefer Composition by OneTouchPoint/Ginny’s Printing Austin, Texas ©2012 by The Society for Historical Archaeology Printed in the United States of America ISSN 0440-9213 The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of the American National Standard for Information Sciences–Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1984. Contents Volume 46, No. 4, 2012 MEMORIAL RODERICK SPRAGUE 1933–2012 1 ARTICLES “Their Houses are Ancient and Ordinary”: Archaeology and Connecticut’s Eighteenth-Century Domestic Architecture ROSS K. HARPER 8 Evaluating Spanish Colonial Alternative Economies in the Archaeological Record AMANDA D. ROBERTS THOMPSON 48 Pueblo Potsherds to Silver Spoons: A Case Study in Historical Archaeology from New Mexico MELISSA PAYNE 70 Hard Labor and Hostile Encounters: What Human Remains Reveal about Institutional Violence and Chinese Immigrants Living in Carlin, Nevada (1885–1923) RYAN P.
    [Show full text]
  • Traditional and Naturally Significant Places Process Primer for the Oglala Sioux Tribe
    St. Cloud State University theRepository at St. Cloud State Culminating Projects in Cultural Resource Management Department of Anthropology 12-2019 Traditional and Naturally Significant Places Process Primer for the Oglala Sioux Tribe Michael Catches Enemy Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.stcloudstate.edu/crm_etds Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Catches Enemy, Michael, "Traditional and Naturally Significant Places Process Primer for the Oglala Sioux Tribe" (2019). Culminating Projects in Cultural Resource Management. 32. https://repository.stcloudstate.edu/crm_etds/32 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Anthropology at theRepository at St. Cloud State. It has been accepted for inclusion in Culminating Projects in Cultural Resource Management by an authorized administrator of theRepository at St. Cloud State. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Traditional and Naturally Significant Places Process Primer for the Oglala Sioux Tribe by Michael Bryan Catches Enemy, Sr. A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of St. Cloud State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in Cultural Resource Management Archaeology December, 2019 Starred Paper Committee: Mark Muñiz Darlene St. Clair Kelly Branam 2 Abstract The Oglala Sioux Tribe, through its various tribal programs like the Historic Preservation Office & the Cultural Affairs Advisory Council (2009-2013), decided to initiate the development of a process primer for the future creation of a more holistic and culturally-relevant identification process for Lakólyakel na ečhá waŋkátuya yawá owáŋka “traditional and naturally significant places” (TNSP’s) to protect and preserve these places within the realm of cultural resource management.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Brett R. Lenz
    COLONIZER GEOARCHAEOLOGY OF THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST REGION A Dissertation DR. BRETT R. LENZ COLONIZER GEOARCHAEOLOGY OF THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST REGION, NORTH AMERICA Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Leicester By Brett Reinhold Lenz Department of Archaeology and Ancient History University of Leicester June 2011 1 DEDICATION This work is dedicated to Garreck, Haydn and Carver. And to Hank, for teaching me how rivers form. 2 Abstract This dissertation involves the development of a geologic framework applied to upper Pleistocene and earliest Holocene archaeological site discovery. It is argued that efforts to identify colonizer archaeological sites require knowledge of geologic processes, Quaternary stratigraphic detail and an understanding of basic soil science principles. An overview of Quaternary geologic deposits based on previous work in the region is presented. This is augmented by original research which presents a new, proposed regional pedostratigraphic framework, a new source of lithic raw material, the Beezley chalcedony, and details of a new cache of lithic tools with Paleoindian affinities made from this previously undescribed stone source. 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The list of people who deserve my thanks and appreciation is large. First, to my parents and family, I give the greatest thanks for providing encouragement and support across many years. Without your steady support it would not be possible. Thanks Mom and Dad, Steph, Jen and Mellissa. To Dani and my sons, I appreciate your patience and support and for your love and encouragement that is always there. Due to a variety of factors, but mostly my own foibles, the research leading to this dissertation has taken place over a protracted period of time, and as a result, different stages of my personal development are likely reflected in it.
    [Show full text]
  • Peut-On Dépasser L'alternative Entre Animaux Réels Et
    Peut-on dépasser l’alternative entre animaux réels et animaux imaginaires? Pierre Lagrange To cite this version: Pierre Lagrange. Peut-on dépasser l’alternative entre animaux réels et animaux imaginaires?. Préten- taine, Prétentaine, 2016. halshs-02137380 HAL Id: halshs-02137380 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-02137380 Submitted on 23 May 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Peut-on dépasser l’alternative entre animaux réels et animaux imaginaires ? Pierre L AGRANGE ES HISTORIENS ONT une méthode pour Deux façons de parler des animaux parler des animaux imaginaires (dra- gons, licornes, sirènes). Méthode qui Malheureusement, ces deux méthodes sont irré- consiste à décrire la genèse de ces conciliables. La méthode qui permet d’étudier les créaturesL dans les cultures et l’imaginaire hu- animaux imaginaires ne permet pas de rendre mains, et les raisons pour lesquelles des gens ont compte des animaux réels car la frontière entre la pu, et peuvent encore parfois, y croire (1). réalité biologique et l’imaginaire culturel consti- tue une frontière hermétique, infranchissable. Les historiens ont aussi, depuis le grand livre de Comme le notait Jacques Le Goff dans sa célèbre Robert Delort, Les Animaux ont une histoire, étude sur le dragon de Saint Marcel : « Si le dra- publié en 1984 (2), une méthode pour parler des gon dont Saint Marcel a débarrassé les Parisiens a animaux réels.
    [Show full text]
  • Searching for Sasquatch
    SEARCHING FOR SASQUATCH 9780230111479_01_prexii.indd i 1/16/2011 5:40:31 PM PALGRAVE STUDIES IN THE HISTORY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY James Rodger Fleming (Colby College) and Roger D. Launius (National Air and Space Museum), Series Editors This series presents original, high-quality, and accessible works at the cut- ting edge of scholarship within the history of science and technology. Books in the series aim to disseminate new knowledge and new perspectives about the history of science and technology, enhance and extend education, foster public understanding, and enrich cultural life. Collectively, these books will break down conventional lines of demarcation by incorporating historical perspectives into issues of current and ongoing concern, offering interna- tional and global perspectives on a variety of issues, and bridging the gap between historians and practicing scientists. In this way they advance schol- arly conversation within and across traditional disciplines but also to help define new areas of intellectual endeavor. Published by Palgrave Macmillan: Continental Defense in the Eisenhower Era: Nuclear Antiaircraft Arms and the Cold War By Christopher J. Bright Confronting the Climate: British Airs and the Making of Environmental Medicine By Vladimir Janković Globalizing Polar Science: Reconsidering the International Polar and Geophysical Years Edited by Roger D. Launius, James Rodger Fleming, and David H. DeVorkin Eugenics and the Nature-Nurture Debate in the Twentieth Century By Aaron Gillette John F. Kennedy and the Race to the Moon By John M. Logsdon A Vision of Modern Science: John Tyndall and the Role of the Scientist in Victorian Culture By Ursula DeYoung Searching for Sasquatch: Crackpots, Eggheads, and Cryptozoology By Brian Regal 9780230111479_01_prexii.indd ii 1/16/2011 5:40:31 PM Searching for Sasquatch Crackpots, Eggheads, and Cryptozoology Brian Regal 9780230111479_01_prexii.indd iii 1/16/2011 5:40:31 PM SEARCHING FOR SASQUATCH Copyright © Brian Regal, 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Songs by Title
    Karaoke Song Book Songs by Title Title Artist Title Artist #1 Nelly 18 And Life Skid Row #1 Crush Garbage 18 'til I Die Adams, Bryan #Dream Lennon, John 18 Yellow Roses Darin, Bobby (doo Wop) That Thing Parody 19 2000 Gorillaz (I Hate) Everything About You Three Days Grace 19 2000 Gorrilaz (I Would Do) Anything For Love Meatloaf 19 Somethin' Mark Wills (If You're Not In It For Love) I'm Outta Here Twain, Shania 19 Somethin' Wills, Mark (I'm Not Your) Steppin' Stone Monkees, The 19 SOMETHING WILLS,MARK (Now & Then) There's A Fool Such As I Presley, Elvis 192000 Gorillaz (Our Love) Don't Throw It All Away Andy Gibb 1969 Stegall, Keith (Sitting On The) Dock Of The Bay Redding, Otis 1979 Smashing Pumpkins (Theme From) The Monkees Monkees, The 1982 Randy Travis (you Drive Me) Crazy Britney Spears 1982 Travis, Randy (Your Love Has Lifted Me) Higher And Higher Coolidge, Rita 1985 BOWLING FOR SOUP 03 Bonnie & Clyde Jay Z & Beyonce 1985 Bowling For Soup 03 Bonnie & Clyde Jay Z & Beyonce Knowles 1985 BOWLING FOR SOUP '03 Bonnie & Clyde Jay Z & Beyonce Knowles 1985 Bowling For Soup 03 Bonnie And Clyde Jay Z & Beyonce 1999 Prince 1 2 3 Estefan, Gloria 1999 Prince & Revolution 1 Thing Amerie 1999 Wilkinsons, The 1, 2, 3, 4, Sumpin' New Coolio 19Th Nervous Breakdown Rolling Stones, The 1,2 STEP CIARA & M. ELLIOTT 2 Become 1 Jewel 10 Days Late Third Eye Blind 2 Become 1 Spice Girls 10 Min Sorry We've Stopped Taking Requests 2 Become 1 Spice Girls, The 10 Min The Karaoke Show Is Over 2 Become One SPICE GIRLS 10 Min Welcome To Karaoke Show 2 Faced Louise 10 Out Of 10 Louchie Lou 2 Find U Jewel 10 Rounds With Jose Cuervo Byrd, Tracy 2 For The Show Trooper 10 Seconds Down Sugar Ray 2 Legit 2 Quit Hammer, M.C.
    [Show full text]
  • 8123 Songs, 21 Days, 63.83 GB
    Page 1 of 247 Music 8123 songs, 21 days, 63.83 GB Name Artist The A Team Ed Sheeran A-List (Radio Edit) XMIXR Sisqo feat. Waka Flocka Flame A.D.I.D.A.S. (Clean Edit) Killer Mike ft Big Boi Aaroma (Bonus Version) Pru About A Girl The Academy Is... About The Money (Radio Edit) XMIXR T.I. feat. Young Thug About The Money (Remix) (Radio Edit) XMIXR T.I. feat. Young Thug, Lil Wayne & Jeezy About Us [Pop Edit] Brooke Hogan ft. Paul Wall Absolute Zero (Radio Edit) XMIXR Stone Sour Absolutely (Story Of A Girl) Ninedays Absolution Calling (Radio Edit) XMIXR Incubus Acapella Karmin Acapella Kelis Acapella (Radio Edit) XMIXR Karmin Accidentally in Love Counting Crows According To You (Top 40 Edit) Orianthi Act Right (Promo Only Clean Edit) Yo Gotti Feat. Young Jeezy & YG Act Right (Radio Edit) XMIXR Yo Gotti ft Jeezy & YG Actin Crazy (Radio Edit) XMIXR Action Bronson Actin' Up (Clean) Wale & Meek Mill f./French Montana Actin' Up (Radio Edit) XMIXR Wale & Meek Mill ft French Montana Action Man Hafdís Huld Addicted Ace Young Addicted Enrique Iglsias Addicted Saving abel Addicted Simple Plan Addicted To Bass Puretone Addicted To Pain (Radio Edit) XMIXR Alter Bridge Addicted To You (Radio Edit) XMIXR Avicii Addiction Ryan Leslie Feat. Cassie & Fabolous Music Page 2 of 247 Name Artist Addresses (Radio Edit) XMIXR T.I. Adore You (Radio Edit) XMIXR Miley Cyrus Adorn Miguel Adorn Miguel Adorn (Radio Edit) XMIXR Miguel Adorn (Remix) Miguel f./Wiz Khalifa Adorn (Remix) (Radio Edit) XMIXR Miguel ft Wiz Khalifa Adrenaline (Radio Edit) XMIXR Shinedown Adrienne Calling, The Adult Swim (Radio Edit) XMIXR DJ Spinking feat.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer Assignment AP Language
    2020 Junior/Senior AP Language Summer Reading Assignment Read the following ten essays: 1. President Abraham Lincoln, “First Inaugural Address, March 4, 1861” 2. George Orwell, “A Hanging” 3. Loren Eiseley, “The Bird and the Machine” 4. Henry David Thoreau, “Brute Neighbors” 5. Bernard Cooper, “The Fine Art of Sighing” 6. Dave Barry, “Breaking the Ice” 7. Mark Twain, “Two Ways of Seeing a River” 8. Annie Dillard, “This is the Life” 9. George Koch, “Naked in Orlando” 10. Langston Hughes, “The Negro Artist and the Racial Mountain” Each AP English language and composition student must read the essays listed above over the summer months and analyze each essay utilizing the S.O.A.P. analysis format to be turned in by the end of the second week of class in the fall. The finished project will contain the S.O.A.P. analysis for each of the ten essays in order, typed, properly labeled and formatted. I advise you to begin reading and writing immediately as both the reading and the writing requirements are extensive. Finally, you must maintain both your integrity and your moral standards when completing this assignment. Do not ask another student to share his or her work with you. By doing this you compromise both yourself and the standards of the person assisting you. Summer reading for AP English is not optional. All students must complete the reading and the writing activities if they wish to continue in AP classes. Students who do not complete and turn in the summer reading assignment ON TIME may be dropped from AP English.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Archaeology : 070-313
    HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY : 070-313 FALL 2020 : PROVISIONAL COURSE SCHEDULE (Please note that additional clips, movies, etc will be added to this schedule as needed) Instructor: Professor Carmel Schrire Class Location: Biosciences Bldg., DC, Room 206 Class Hours: T, Th. 3.55-5.15 pm Office: RAB 201, DC Email: [email protected] Office Hours: By apt, on Zoom, FaceTime, or email WEEK 1 (Sept 3) Introduction to Historical Archaeology The field is defined and described and the processes of site discovery, excavation and analysis are discussed. Readings: Deetz, 1996, Chapters 1, 2; Noel Hume 1983, Chapters 1-3 Clip: Ivor Noel Hume: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6i3k2BKz-WA WEEK 2 (Sept 8,10) Elements of Historical Archaeology The building blocks of the field – sites, artefacts and written records - are explored. Artifacts are described and collections are handled in order to understand how their contexts and characteristics help date and interpret a variety of sites. Historical documents, including travel accounts and iconography and ships’ records, as well as probates and inventories, are studied to show how class and status is constructed from written documents Readings: Deetz, 1996, chapters 1-5; Hicks & Beaudry 2006; Noel Hume 1983, Chapters 4,5; Schrire et al 1990 Movie: Other Peoples Garbage (Short version via Odyssey) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S_zmCD4Eojg Clip: Ceramics: http://historicjamestowne.org/collections/ceramics-research- group/ WEEK 3 (Sept 15,17) Archaeology of Exploration : Ships, Shipwrecks, Trade The history of the expansion of European power and trade into Asia, Africa and America and the impact of European colonization on indigenous people.
    [Show full text]