DOCSLIB.ORG

Shuttle Builds the International Space Station

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Shuttle Builds the International Space Station Shuttle Builds Since its inception, the International Space Station (ISS) was destined to have a close relationship with the Space Shuttle. Conceived for very the International different missions, the two spacecraft drew on each other’s strengths Space Station and empowered each other to achieve more than either could alone. The shuttle was the workhorse that could loft massive ISS elements into space. It could then maneuver, manipulate, and support these pieces John Bacon Melanie Saunders with power, simple data monitoring, and temperature control until the Improvements to the Shuttle pieces could be assembled. The ISS gradually became the port of call Facilitated Assembly of for the shuttles that served it. the International Space Station Lee Norbraten The idea of building a space station dates back to Konstantin Financial Benefits of the Tsiolkovsky’s writings in 1883. A space station would be a small colony Space Shuttle for the United States Melanie Saunders in space where long-term research could be carried out. Visionaries in Psychological Support— many nations offered hundreds of design concepts over the next century Lessons from Shuttle-Mir and a half, and a few simple outposts were built in the late 20th to International Space Station century. The dreams of an enduring international space laboratory Albert Holland coalesced when the shuttle made it a practical reality. As a parent and child grow, so too did the relationship between the shuttle and the ISS as the fledgling station grew out of its total dependence on the shuttle to its role as a port of call. The ISS soon became the dominant destination in the heavens, hosting vehicles launched from many spaceports in four continents below, including shuttles from the Florida coast. 130 The Space Shuttle and Its Operations Creating the In April 1984, STS-41C deployed Spacelab and Spacehab Flights one of the most important and International Space comprehensive test programs—the Skylab had been an interesting first Station Masterpiece— Long Duration Exposure Facility. step in research but, after the Saturn V STS-32 retrieved the facility in January production ceased, all US space station in Well-planned 1990, giving critical evidence of the designs would be limited to something Increments performance and degradation timeline of similar to the Orbiter’s 4.6-m (1 5-ft.) materials in the low-Earth environment. payload bay diameter. The shuttle Building this miniature world in the It was a treasure trove of data about had given the world ample ways vacuum of space was to be the largest the micrometeoroid orbital debris to evolve concepts of space station engineering challenge in history. It was threat that the ISS would face. NASA’s modules, including a European Space made possible by the incomparable ability to launch such huge test fixtures Agency-built Spacelab and an capabilities of the winged fleet of and to examine them back on Earth American-built Spacehab. Each module shuttles that brought and assembled the after flight added immensely to the rode in the payload bay of the Orbiter. pieces. The space station did not spring engineers’ understanding of the These labs had the same outer diameter into being “out of thin air.” Rather, it technical refinements that would be as subsequent ISS modules. made use of progressively sophisticated necessary for the massively complicated engineering and operations techniques The shuttle could provide the necessary ISS construction. that were matured by the Space Shuttle power, communications, cooling, Program over the preceding 17 years. The next stage in the process would and life support to these laboratories. This evolution began before the first involve an international connection and Due to consumables limits, the shuttle International Space Station (ISS) the coming together of great scientific could only keep these labs in orbit assembly flight ever left the ground— and engineering minds. for a maximum of 2 weeks at a time. or even the drawing board. Through the experience, however, Early Tests Form a Blueprint NASA ran a series of tests beginning with a deployable solar power wing experiment on Discovery’s first flight (Space Transportation System [STS]-41D in 1984) to validate the construction techniques that would be used to build the ISS. On STS-41G (1 984), astronauts demonstrated the safe capability for in-space resupply of dangerous rocket propellants in a payload bay apparatus. Astronauts practiced extravehicular activity (EVA) assembly techniques for space-station-sized structures in experiments aboard STS-61B (1 985). Several missions tested the performance of large heat pipes in space. NASA explored mobility aids and EVA handling limits during STS-37 (1 991 ). Space Shuttle Atlantis (STS-71) is docked with the Russian space station Mir (1995). At the time, Atlantis and Mir had formed the largest spacecraft ever in orbit. Photo taken from Russian Soyuz vehicle as shuttle begins undocking from Mir. Photo provided to NASA by Russian Federal Space Agency. The Space Shuttle and Its Operations 131 astronaut crews and ground engineers discovered many issues of loading and Astronaut Shannon Lucid floats in the deploying real payloads, establishing tunnel that connects optimum work positions and locations, Atlantis’ (STS-79 clearances, cleanliness, mobility, [1996]) cabin to the environmental issues, etc. Spacehab double module in the cargo bay. Lucid and her Shuttle-Mir crew mates were already separated In 1994, the funding of the Space from the Russian Station Program passed the US Senate space station Mir by a single vote. Later that year, and were completing end-of-mission Vice President Al Gore and Russian chores before their Deputy Premier Viktor Chernomyrdin return to Earth. signed the agreement that redefined both countries’ space station programs. That agreement also directed the US Striving for Lofty Heights— when the shuttle could angle enough Space Shuttle Program and the Russian And Reaching Them to meet the Russian orbit. space program to immediately hone the complex cooperative operations The biggest effect on the shuttle in Thus, in a cooperative program with required to build the new, larger-than- this merged program was the need to vehicles like Mir (and later the ISS), the dreamed space station. That operations reach a higher-inclination orbit that shuttle had only a tiny “window” each development effort would come through could be accessed from Baikonur day when it could launch. The brief a series of increasingly complex flights Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan. At an chance to beat any intermittent weather of the shuttle to the existing Russian inclination of 51 .6 degrees to the meant that the launch teams and space station Mir. George Abbey, equator, this new orbit for the ISS Mission Control personnel often had to director of Johnson Space Center, would not take as much advantage of wait days for acceptable weather during provided the leadership to ensure the the speed of the Earth’s rotation toward the launch window. As a result of the success of the Shuttle-Mir Program. the East as had originally been planned. frequent launch slips, the Mir and ISS Instead of launching straight eastward control teams had to learn to pack days The Space Shuttle Program immediately and achieving nearly 1,287 km/hour with spontaneous work schedules for engaged Mir engineers and the Moscow (800 mph) from Earth’s rotation, the the station crew on a single day’s Control Center to begin joint operations shuttle now had to aim northward notice. Flexibility grew to become a planning. Simultaneously, engineers to meet the vehicles launched from high art form in both programs. working on the former US-led Space Baikonur, achieving a benefit of only Once the shuttle had launched into the Station Program, called Freedom, went 901 km/hour (560 mph). The speed orbit plane of the Mir, it had to catch to work with their counterparts who difference meant that each shuttle could up to the station before it could dock had been designing and building Mir’s carry substantially less mass to orbit for and begin its mission at the outpost. successor—Mir-II. The new joint the same maximum propellant load. The Normally, rendezvous and docking program was christened the ISS Mir was already in such an orbit, so the would be completed 2 days after Program. Although NASA’s Space constraint was in place from the first launch, giving the shuttle time to make Shuttle and ISS Programs emerged as flight (STS-63 in 1995). flagships for new, vigorous international up any differences between its location cooperation with the former Soviet The next challenge of the 51 .6-degree around the orbit compared to where states, the immediate technical orbit was a very narrow launch window the Mir or ISS was positioned at the challenges were formidable. The Space each day. In performing a rendezvous, time of launch, as well as time for Shuttle Program had to surmount many the shuttle needed to launch close to ground operators to create the precise of these challenges on shorter notice the moment when the shuttle’s launch maneuvering plan that could only be than did the ISS Program. pad was directly in the same flat plane perfected after the main engines cut as the orbit of the target spacecraft. off 8½ minutes after launch. Typically, there were only 5 minutes 132 The Space Shuttle and Its Operations Generally, the plan was to launch The mechanism—called an The Russian wires were designed to then execute the lengthy rendezvous Androgynous Peripheral Docking be soldered into each pin and socket preparation the day after launch. System—became an integral part of while the US connector pins and sockets The shuttle conducted the last stages of the shuttle’s future. It looked a little were all crimped under pressure to their the rendezvous and docking the next like a three-petal artichoke when seen wires in an exact fit.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Soyuz TMA-11 / Expedition 16 Manuel De La Mission
    Soyuz TMA-11 / Expedition 16 Manuel de la mission SOYUZ TMA-11 – EXPEDITION 16 Par Philippe VOLVERT SOMMAIRE I. Présentation des équipages II. Présentation de la mission III. Présentation du vaisseau Soyuz IV. Précédents équipages de l’ISS V. Chronologie de lancement VI. Procédures d’amarrage VII. Procédures de retour VIII. Horaires IX. Sources A noter que toutes les heures présentes dans ce dossier sont en heure GMT. I. PRESENTATION DES EQUIPAGES Equipage Expedition 15 Fyodor YURCHIKHIN (commandant ISS) Lieu et Lieu et date de naissance : 03/01/1959 ; Batumi (Géorgie) Statut familial : Marié et 2 enfants Etudes : Graduat d’économie à la Moscow Service State University Statut professionnel: Ingénieur et travaille depuis 1993 chez RKKE Roskosmos : Sélectionné le 28/07/1997 (RKKE-13) Précédents vols : STS-112 (07/10/2002 au 18/10/2002), totalisant 10 jours 19h58 Oleg KOTOV(ingénieur de bord) Lieu et date de naissance : 27/10/1965 ; Simferopol (Ukraine) Statut familial : Marié et 2 enfants Etudes : Doctorat en médecine obtenu à la Sergei M. Kirov Military Medicine Academy Statut professionnel: Colonel, Russian Air Force et travaille au centre d’entraînement des cosmonautes, le TsPK Roskosmos : Sélectionné le 09/02/1996 (RKKE-12) Précédents vols : - Clayton Conrad ANDERSON (Ingénieur de vol ISS) Lieu et date de naissance : 23/02/1959 ; Omaha (Nebraska) Statut familial : Marié et 2 enfants Etudes : Promu bachelier en physique à Hastings College, maîtrise en ingénierie aérospatiale à la Iowa State University Statut professionnel: Directeur du centre des opérations de secours à la Nasa Nasa : Sélectionné le 04/06/1998 (Groupe) Précédents vols : - Equipage Expedition 16 / Soyuz TM-11 Peggy A.
    [Show full text]
  • Expedition 11, Space Tourist Back on Earth 11 October 2005
    Expedition 11, Space Tourist Back on Earth 11 October 2005 The Soyuz TMA spacecraft undocked from the station at 5:49 p.m. EDT. Its re-entry was flawless. It brought the three men aboard to a landing about 53 miles northeast of Arkalyk after 179 days and 23 minutes in space for the E11 crew. The recovery team reached the capsule in minutes. Krikalev and Phillips will spend several weeks in Star City, near Moscow, for debriefing and medical examinations. They launched from the Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan last April 14. During their increment they performed a spacewalk, continued station maintenance and did scientific experiments. While aboard the station, Krikalev became the world's most experienced spacefarer. On Aug. 16 The Expedition 11 landed back on Earth Monday his cumulative time in space passed the record of at 9:09 p.m. EDT after undocking from the 747 days, 14 hours and 14 minutes set by international space station at 5:49 p.m. EDT. Cosmonaut Sergei Avdeyev. Krikalev previously Commander Sergei Krikalev, Flight Engineer John had completed two long-duration spaceflights Phillips and Spaceflight Participant US millionaire aboard the Mir space station, served as a member businessman Greg Olsen boarded a Soyuz TMA-6 of the Expedition 1 crew of the space station and Monday afternoon for re-entry in Kazakhstan. flown two space shuttle missions. The station's new crewmembers arrived at the By Monday's landing, Krikalev's cumulative time in station on Oct. 3. Expedition 12 Commander Bill space had reached 803 days and 9 hours and 39 McArthur and Flight Engineer Valery Tokarev will minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • Back to the the Future? 07> Probing the Kuiper Belt
    SpaceFlight A British Interplanetary Society publication Volume 62 No.7 July 2020 £5.25 SPACE PLANES: back to the the future? 07> Probing the Kuiper Belt 634089 The man behind the ISS 770038 Remembering Dr Fred Singer 9 CONTENTS Features 16 Multiple stations pledge We look at a critical assessment of the way science is conducted at the International Space Station and finds it wanting. 18 The man behind the ISS 16 The Editor reflects on the life of recently Letter from the Editor deceased Jim Beggs, the NASA Administrator for whom the building of the ISS was his We are particularly pleased this supreme achievement. month to have two features which cover the spectrum of 22 Why don’t we just wing it? astronautical activities. Nick Spall Nick Spall FBIS examines the balance between gives us his critical assessment of winged lifting vehicles and semi-ballistic both winged and blunt-body re-entry vehicles for human space capsules, arguing that the former have been flight and Alan Stern reports on his grossly overlooked. research at the very edge of the 26 Parallels with Apollo 18 connected solar system – the Kuiper Belt. David Baker looks beyond the initial return to the We think of the internet and Moon by astronauts and examines the plan for a how it helps us communicate and sustained presence on the lunar surface. stay in touch, especially in these times of difficulty. But the fact that 28 Probing further in the Kuiper Belt in less than a lifetime we have Alan Stern provides another update on the gone from a tiny bleeping ball in pioneering work of New Horizons.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Reed Barratt
    Michael Reed Barratt It gives me great honor to write this citation for Dr. Michael Reed Assigned to long duration flight training in 2005, Dr. Barratt took Barratt to support his Honorary Membership of the European part in two expeditions: Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Expedition 19/20 (March 26, 2009 to October 11, 2009): Dr. Barratt Born on April 16, 1959 in Vancouver, Washington Dr. Barratt was Flight Engineer on Soyuz TMA-14 at the station on March 26, considers Camas, Washington, to be his home town. He is married 2009. During this period, the station underwent a transition from to Michelle Lynne Sasynuik and they have five children. Dr. Barratt’s three to six permanent station crew members, two spacewalks, personal and recreational interests include writing, sailing, boat two visiting space shuttles and the arrival of the first Japanese restoration and maintenance, family and church activities. H-II Transfer Vehicle (HTV). Dr. Barratt performed two spacewalks in the Russian Orlan suit and participated in further station In 1977 he graduated from Camas High School, Camas, WA and construction and onboard experiments. After completing 199 days obtained a bachelor of Science in Zoology from the University of in space, he landed on October 11, 2009. Washington in 1981. Dr Barratt graduated as a Doctor of Medicine (M.D.) from Northwestern University in 1985. He completed a three- STS-133 (February 24 to March 9, 2011): Dr. Barratt served as year residency in Internal Medicine at Northwestern University in Mission Specialist on the STS-133, the 39th and final mission for 1988 and a Chief Residency year at the Veterans’ Administration Space Shuttle Discovery.
    [Show full text]
  • Weather and Aviation: How Does Weather Affect the Safety and Operations of Airports and Aviation, and How Does FAA Work to Manage Weather-Related Effects?
    Kulesa 1 Weather and Aviation: How Does Weather Affect the Safety and Operations of Airports and Aviation, and How Does FAA Work to Manage Weather-related Effects? By Gloria Kulesa Weather Impacts On Aviation In addition, weather continues to play a significant role in a number of aviation Introduction accidents and incidents. While National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) reports ccording to FAA statistics, weather is most commonly find human error to be the the cause of approximately 70 percent direct accident cause, weather is a primary of the delays in the National Airspace contributing factor in 23 percent of all System (NAS). Figure 1 illustrates aviation accidents. The total weather impact that while weather delays declined with overall is an estimated national cost of $3 billion for NAS delays after September 11th, 2001, delays accident damage and injuries, delays, and have since returned to near-record levels. unexpected operating costs. 60000 50000 40000 30000 20000 10000 0 1 01 01 0 01 02 02 ul an 01 J ep an 02 J Mar May S Nov 01 J Mar May Weather Delays Other Delays Figure 1. Delay hours in the National Airspace System for January 2001 to July 2002. Delay hours peaked at 50,000 hours per month in August 2001, declined to less than 15,000 per month for the months following September 11, but exceeded 30,000 per month in the summer of 2002. Weather delays comprise the majority of delays in all seasons. The Potential Impacts of Climate Change on Transportation 2 Weather and Aviation: How Does Weather Affect the Safety and Operations of Airports and Aviation, and How Does FAA Work to Manage Weather-related Effects? Thunderstorms and Other Convective In-Flight Icing.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Leak on Space Station 29 September 2020
    Russia reports 'non-standard' air leak on Space Station 29 September 2020 manned space programmes, in a televised comment. He said the ISS always has slight air loss due to the air purifying system. "These leaks are predictable. What's happening now is more than the standard leakage and naturally if it lasts a long time, it will require supplies of extra air to the station," he said. He said the crew were now resting but hoped to find the precise spot and fix the leak on Wednesday. Credit: Pixabay/CC0 Public Domain "That's not for sure," he added, saying there was quite a large area to search. "We have time. The leak exists of course. It's not Russia said Tuesday that astronauts had found an good that it's there, but it's not critical," he said. air leak in its section of the International Space Station, with a senior space official calling the air NASA said that the leak had appeared to grow in loss beyond expected levels. size overnight Monday to Tuesday and the crew were awakened by flight controllers to carry out a The crew on the ISS—Russian cosmonauts Anatoly search. Ivanishin and Ivan Vagner and NASA astronaut Christopher Cassidy—have been searching for the It was later found that a temperature change had air leak since August, first checking the US made the leak seem to grow, while the rate of air segment. escaping was "unchanged," the US space agency said. Russia's space agency, Roscosmos, said in a statement that after analysis and a search for the Previously, astronauts had searched for the source leak "it was established that the spot is located in of the leak in the US segment of the station using the Zvezda (star) service module, which contains an ultrasound detector.
    [Show full text]
  • For Immediate Release
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE ASTRONAUTS, EXPERTS, AND SPACE AGENCIES DISCUSS ASTEROIDS, OPPORTUNITIES, AND RISKS ON ASTEROID DAY, 30 JUNE LUXEMBOURG, 22 June 2020 /PRNewswire/ -- The Asteroid Foundation returns with Asteroid Day LIVE ​ ​ ​ Digital from Luxembourg. This year, the event is a fully digital celebration of asteroid science and exploration. Panel discussions and one-on-one interviews with astronauts and world experts will be broadcast on 30 June 2020. Each year Asteroid Day presents the public with a snap-shot of cutting-edge asteroid research from the largest ​ telescopes on Earth to some of the most ambitious space missions. Topics of discussion this year include the ​ acceleration in the rate of our asteroid discoveries and why it is set to accelerate even faster, the imminent arrival of samples from asteroid Ryugu and Bennu, the exciting preparations for the joint US-Europe mission to binary asteroid Didymos, and much more. Asteroids are the leftover remnants of the birth of the planets in the Solar System, and many are the shattered fragments of these diminutive proto-planets that never made it to maturity. “Asteroid exploration missions tell ​ us about the birth of our own planet and reveal how asteroids can serve astronauts as stepping stones to Mars,” says Tom Jones, PhD, veteran astronaut and planetary scientist, and Asteroid Day Expert Panel ​ member. Each asteroid is an individual with its own story to tell. And that’s what Asteroid Day is all about: bringing those stories to the widest audience possible. “Space and science have been an endless source of inspiration ​ for SES! This is one of the reasons why we and our partners continue to do extraordinary things in space to deliver amazing experiences everywhere on earth,” says Ruy Pinto, Chief Technology Officer at SES.
    [Show full text]
  • December 2012 Newsletter
    December 2012 Inside This Issue: pg: Sierra Lobo’s Headline News 1 Corporate News 2 USAF AFRL ARES III 15 Wolf Tracks NASA AMES Research Center (ARC) 16 NASA Glenn Research Center (GRC) 18 NASA Johnson Space Center (JSC) 20 NASA Kennedy Space Center (KESC) 21 NASA Kennedy Space Center (KISC) 22 NASA Langley Research Center (LaRC) 23 Michoud Assembly Facility (MAF) 25 Redstone Test Center (RTC) 26 Wright-Patterson AFB (WPAFB) 28 Technology Development and Engineering Center (TDEC) 29 Corporate Safety 32 Environmental Issues in T&E 33 Industry News 34 Welcome to the Pack 38 Industry Trivia 40 Sierra Lobo Wins the Engineering Fabrication Services (EFS) Contract at Johnson Space Center (JSC), Absorbs the Wind Tunnel Support Contract on RDSTS, and is Selected for the NASA Space Launch System Advance Development Program. Sierra Lobo (SLI) Primes EFS Win Sierra Lobo Wins SLS Contract The Cryo-Tracker® sensor is a winner of the The Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center, in SLI announces that NASA, Marshall Space R&D 100 Award, recognizing the top 100 ® best new technologies in the world. The Cryo Houston, Texas, NASA’s lead Center for Flight Center, selected our Cryo-Tracker ® human rated spaceflight hardware design and Mass Gauging System for their Space -Tracker sensor proposed for use as SLS’s production, selected Sierra Lobo to “Prime” Launch System (SLS) Advance Development cryogenic liquid-level sensing system is the its EFS Contract. The primary goals of this Program. This selection is part of NASA’s result of more than 16 years of concept contract are to provide JSC organizations and Research Announcement (NRA) to support exploration, validation, and extensive testing external customers the highest quality, cost the evolutionary development strategy for in laboratory and relevant environments.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Rocket Booklet
    A guide to building and understanding the physics of Water Rockets Version 1.02 June 2007 Warning: Water Rocketeering is a potentially dangerous activity and individuals following the instructions herein do so at their own risk. Exclusion of liability: NPL Management Limited cannot exclude the risk of accident and, for this reason, hereby exclude, to the maximum extent permissible by law, any and all liability for loss, damage, or harm, howsoever arising. Contents WATER ROCKETS SECTION 1: WHAT IS A WATER ROCKET? 1 SECTION 3: LAUNCHERS 9 SECTION 4: OPTIMISING ROCKET DESIGN 15 SECTION 5: TESTING YOUR ROCKET 24 SECTION 6: PHYSICS OF A WATER ROCKET 29 SECTION 7: COMPUTER SIMULATION 32 SECTION 8: SAFETY 37 SECTION 9: USEFUL INFORMATION 38 SECTION 10: SOME INTERESTING DETAILS 40 Copyright and Reproduction Michael de Podesta hereby asserts his right to be identified as author of this booklet. The copyright of this booklet is owned by NPL. Michael de Podesta and NPL grant permission to reproduce the booklet in part or in whole for any not-for-profit educational activity, but you must acknowledge both the author and the copyright owner. Acknowledgements I began writing this guide to support people entering the NPL Water Rocket Competition. So the first acknowledgement has to be to Dr. Nick McCormick, who founded the competition many years ago and who is still the driving force behind the activity at NPL. Nick’s instinct for physics and fun has brought pleasure to thousands. The inspiration to actually begin writing this document instead of just saying that someone ought to do it, was provided by Andrew Hanson.
    [Show full text]
  • IAF-01-T.1.O1 Progress on the International Space Station
    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20150020985 2019-08-31T05:38:38+00:00Z IAF-01-T.1.O1 Progress on the International Space Station - We're Part Way up the Mountain John-David F. Bartoe and Thomas Holloway NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, Texas, USA The first phase of the International Space Station construction has been completed, and research has begun. Russian, U.S., and Canadian hardware is on orbit, ard Italian logistics modules have visited often. With the delivery of the U.S. Laboratory, Destiny, significant research capability is in place, and dozens of U.S. and Russian experiments have been conducted. Crew members have been on orbit continuously since November 2000. Several "bumps in the road" have occurred along the way, and each has been systematically overcome. Enormous amounts of hardware and software are being developed by the International Space Station partners and participants around the world and are largely on schedule for launch. Significant progress has been made in the testing of completed elements at launch sites in the United States and Kazakhstan. Over 250,000 kg of flight hardware have been delivered to the Kennedy Space Center and integrated testing of several elements wired together has progressed extremely well. Mission control centers are fully functioning in Houston, Moscow, and Canada, and operations centers Darmstadt, Tsukuba, Turino, and Huntsville will be going on line as they are required. Extensive coordination efforts continue among the space agencies of the five partners and two participants, involving 16 nations. All of them continue to face their own challenges and have achieved significant successes.
    [Show full text]
  • Expedition 16 Adding International Science
    EXPEDITION 16 ADDING INTERNATIONAL SCIENCE The most complex phase of assembly since the NASA Astronaut Peggy Whitson, the fi rst woman Two days after launch, International Space Station was fi rst occupied seven commander of the ISS, and Russian Cosmonaut the Soyuz docked The International Space Station is seen by the crew of STS-118 years ago began when the Expedition 16 crew arrived Yuri Malenchenko were launched aboard the Soyuz to the Space Station as Space Shuttle Endeavour moves away. at the orbiting outpost. During this ambitious six-month TMA-11 spacecraft from the Baikonur Cosmodrome joining Expedition 15 endeavor, an unprecedented three Space Shuttle in Kazakhstan on October 10. The two veterans of Commander Fyodor crews will visit the Station delivering critical new earlier missions aboard the ISS were accompanied by Yurchikhin, Oleg Kotov, components – the American-built “Harmony” node, the Dr. Sheikh Muzaphar Shukor, an orthopedic surgeon both of Russia, and European Space Agency’s “Columbus” laboratory and and the fi rst Malaysian to fl y in space. NASA Flight Engineer Japanese “Kibo” element. Clayton Anderson. Shukor spent nine days CREW PROFILE on the ISS, returning to Earth in the Soyuz Peggy Whitson (Ph. D.) TMA-10 on October Expedition 16 Commander 21 with Yurchikhin and Born: February 9, 1960, Mount Ayr, Iowa Kotov who had been Education: Graduated with a bachelors degree in biology/chemistry from Iowa aboard the station since Wesleyan College, 1981 & a doctorate in biochemistry from Rice University, 1985 April 9. Experience: Selected as an astronaut in 1996, Whitson served as a Science Offi cer during Expedition 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Highlights in Space 2010
    International Astronautical Federation Committee on Space Research International Institute of Space Law 94 bis, Avenue de Suffren c/o CNES 94 bis, Avenue de Suffren UNITED NATIONS 75015 Paris, France 2 place Maurice Quentin 75015 Paris, France Tel: +33 1 45 67 42 60 Fax: +33 1 42 73 21 20 Tel. + 33 1 44 76 75 10 E-mail: : [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Fax. + 33 1 44 76 74 37 URL: www.iislweb.com OFFICE FOR OUTER SPACE AFFAIRS URL: www.iafastro.com E-mail: [email protected] URL : http://cosparhq.cnes.fr Highlights in Space 2010 Prepared in cooperation with the International Astronautical Federation, the Committee on Space Research and the International Institute of Space Law The United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs is responsible for promoting international cooperation in the peaceful uses of outer space and assisting developing countries in using space science and technology. United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs P. O. Box 500, 1400 Vienna, Austria Tel: (+43-1) 26060-4950 Fax: (+43-1) 26060-5830 E-mail: [email protected] URL: www.unoosa.org United Nations publication Printed in Austria USD 15 Sales No. E.11.I.3 ISBN 978-92-1-101236-1 ST/SPACE/57 *1180239* V.11-80239—January 2011—775 UNITED NATIONS OFFICE FOR OUTER SPACE AFFAIRS UNITED NATIONS OFFICE AT VIENNA Highlights in Space 2010 Prepared in cooperation with the International Astronautical Federation, the Committee on Space Research and the International Institute of Space Law Progress in space science, technology and applications, international cooperation and space law UNITED NATIONS New York, 2011 UniTEd NationS PUblication Sales no.
    [Show full text]