Rally Round the Flag! Accessed 2/19/2015
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Haviland-Historical
*Shall Woman's Voice Be Hushed?": Laura Smith Uavita;1ffi Women's "O,ionist by Tiya Miles In September of 201'0, residents of southeastern Michign gathered at the Lenawee County Historical Museum for a lecture on locally renowned Underground Railroad "conductor" Laura Smith Haviland. The next weekend at a nearby annual art festival, Haviland was a focal point in a dramattc, if exaggerated, historical performance in which she was portrayed as freeing thousands of slaves and facing off a pack of h*gty wolves while en route to Canadal A commissioned poruait of Haviland-eldedy, wise, and gracefirlly holding a bouquet 6f 165ss- hangs in the Michigan W'omen's Historical Center and Hall of Fame in Lansing.2 In the state of Michigan, LawraHaviand is a heroic chatacter subject to the excesses of legend. In the historical literatute on antislavery womeq however, Haviland has been largely ovedooked. In this aricle,I explore Laura Haviland's activism in relation to the historiography of abolitionist women. I consider feasons Haviland failed to become a person of interest in the literature until very recendy' everl as the scholady scope widened in the 1990s and eady 2000s to include women who had been marginalized from the dominant narcattve of antislavery politics. Additionally, this work suggests th^t an examination of Haviland's actions and social networks illuminates the regional particularity of Midwesteffl women's antislavery culture as well as the ftansnational charactet of Great Lakes abolitionism' 1 Haviland's life was also reenacted in a "Historical Dalf' at the Adrian woman's Club in 1948. -
The United States Atomic Army, 1956-1960 Dissertation
INTIMIDATING THE WORLD: THE UNITED STATES ATOMIC ARMY, 1956-1960 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Paul C. Jussel, B.A., M.M.A.S., M.S.S. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2004 Dissertation Committee Approved by Professor Allan R. Millett, Advisor Professor John R. Guilmartin __________________ Professor William R. Childs Advisor Department of History ABSTRACT The atomic bomb created a new military dynamic for the world in 1945. The bomb, if used properly, could replace the artillery fires and air-delivered bombs used to defeat the concentrated force of an enemy. The weapon provided the U.S. with an unparalleled advantage over the rest of the world, until the Soviet Union developed its own bomb by 1949 and symmetry in warfare returned. Soon, theories of warfare changed to reflect the belief that the best way to avoid the effects of the bomb was through dispersion of forces. Eventually, the American Army reorganized its divisions from the traditional three-unit organization to a new five-unit organization, dubbed pentomic by its Chief of Staff, General Maxwell D. Taylor. While atomic weapons certainly had an effect on Taylor’s reasoning to adopt the pentomic organization, the idea was not new in 1956; the Army hierarchy had been wrestling with restructuring since the end of World War II. Though the Korean War derailed the Army’s plans for the early fifties, it returned to the forefront under the Eisenhower Administration. The driving force behind reorganization in 1952 was not ii only the reoriented and reduced defense budget, but also the Army’s inroads to the atomic club, formerly the domain of only the Air Force and the Navy. -
The Lowell 14Th Annual Lowell Community Expo To
ROOI the lowell 97 Wednesday • march • 17 • 2010 I c^ cl ^ " p vol. 39 issue 23 for over 116 years • today - tomorrow - your lowell area news source www, thelowell ledger, com Happy th St. Patrick's Day! 14 annual Lowell Community Expo to maple feature variety of businesses, nonprofits syrup time byv Emma PaloyPalova ^ / i The 14th annual Lowell provide networking oppor- Baker. "We wanted to show- to provide the venue to this This year, the exclusive Community Expo will fea- tunities offered by the Low- case our businesses, organi- day. business sponsor is The ture most area businesses ell Area Chamber of Com- zations and churches." The first Expo was held in Lowell Ledger/Lowell Litho. and nonprofits on March 27 merce. The Lowell Area Schools May, but the committee soon As part of the overall market- at the Lowell High School. "We were one of the first (LAS) were pushing market- found out that was too late ing strategy, a special section The mission remains the small community expos," ing at the time and continue in the year to hold an Expo. covering the Expo with maps same as in the beginning to said chamber director Liz The event was then changed and the schedule will come to March. out in the Buyers Guide on "it's a true community March 21. Expo where everybody "This is a new venture works to create the commu- in our marketing strategy," nity we live in," said Baker. said Baker. "It's good for the 4klt also highlights the Low- sponsoring business." ell Area School districl." The Expo has become a The attendance has huge part of the greater Low- grown over the years from ell community. -
Famous People from Michigan
APPENDIX E Famo[ People fom Michigan any nationally or internationally known people were born or have made Mtheir home in Michigan. BUSINESS AND PHILANTHROPY William Agee John F. Dodge Henry Joy John Jacob Astor Herbert H. Dow John Harvey Kellogg Anna Sutherland Bissell Max DuPre Will K. Kellogg Michael Blumenthal William C. Durant Charles Kettering William E. Boeing Georgia Emery Sebastian S. Kresge Walter Briggs John Fetzer Madeline LaFramboise David Dunbar Buick Frederic Fisher Henry M. Leland William Austin Burt Max Fisher Elijah McCoy Roy Chapin David Gerber Charles S. Mott Louis Chevrolet Edsel Ford Charles Nash Walter P. Chrysler Henry Ford Ransom E. Olds James Couzens Henry Ford II Charles W. Post Keith Crain Barry Gordy Alfred P. Sloan Henry Crapo Charles H. Hackley Peter Stroh William Crapo Joseph L. Hudson Alfred Taubman Mary Cunningham George M. Humphrey William E. Upjohn Harlow H. Curtice Lee Iacocca Jay Van Andel John DeLorean Mike Illitch Charles E. Wilson Richard DeVos Rick Inatome John Ziegler Horace E. Dodge Robert Ingersol ARTS AND LETTERS Mitch Albom Milton Brooks Marguerite Lofft DeAngeli Harriette Simpson Arnow Ken Burns Meindert DeJong W. H. Auden Semyon Bychkov John Dewey Liberty Hyde Bailey Alexander Calder Antal Dorati Ray Stannard Baker Will Carleton Alden Dow (pen: David Grayson) Jim Cash Sexton Ehrling L. Frank Baum (Charles) Bruce Catton Richard Ellmann Harry Bertoia Elizabeth Margaret Jack Epps, Jr. William Bolcom Chandler Edna Ferber Carrie Jacobs Bond Manny Crisostomo Phillip Fike Lilian Jackson Braun James Oliver Curwood 398 MICHIGAN IN BRIEF APPENDIX E: FAMOUS PEOPLE FROM MICHIGAN Marshall Fredericks Hugie Lee-Smith Carl M. -
Bulletin of the College of William and Mary in Virginia
c ii.A^ .-\^ -¥- Vol. 34, No. 3 BULLETIN March, 1940 of The College of William and Mary IN Virginia CATALOGUE of W^t College of l^illiam anb iMarp in Virginia Two Hundred and Forty-Seventh Yeah 1959-mo Announcements , Session 1940-1941 WILLIAMSBURG, VIRGINIA 1940 Entered at the post office at Williamsburg, Virginia, July 3, 1926, under act of August 24, 1912, as second-class matter Issued January, February, March, April, June, August, November Entered at the post office at Williamsburg, Virginia, July 3, 1926, under act of August 24, 1912, as second-class matter Issued January, February, March, April, June, August, November Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with funding from LYRASIS IVIembers and Sloan Foundation http://www.archive.org/details/bulletinofcolleg343coll Wren Building—East Front Showing Lord Botetourt's Statue Vol. 34, No. 3 BULLETIN March, 1940 of The College of William and Mary IN Virginia CATALOGUE W^t College of William anb iHarp in Two Hundred and Forty-Seventh Year 1939-1940 Announcements i Session 1940-1941 WILLIAMSBURG, VIRGINIA 1940 Entered at the post office at Williamsburg, Virginia, July 3, 1926, under act of August 24, 1912, as second-class matter Issued January, February, March, April, June, August, November CONTENTS Page Calendar 4 College Calendar 5 Board of Visitors 6 Standing Committees of the Board of Visitors 7 OflScers of Administration 8 Officers of Instruction 9 Standing Committees of the Faculty 18 Special Lecturers 21 Alumni Association 22 Societies and Publications 24 Athletics for Men 26 -
Laura Haviland and Frances Willard Serving Their “Present Age” in Two Strands of Nineteenth-Century Methodism
Oxford Institute of Methodist Theological Studies August 2007 Kristina LaCelle-Peterson “Our Calling to Fulfill”: Laura Haviland and Frances Willard Serving their “Present Age” in Two Strands of Nineteenth-Century Methodism Frances Willard was a women’s college president while Laura Smith Haviland taught school to African Americans in the basement of churches. Willard fought for justice in the courts while Haviland labored in the trenches (almost literally). Willard agitated for the just treatment of women through channels of respectability while Haviland worked in dangerous and poverty-stricken areas for the very lives of ex-slaves. Out of love for God and a desire to see justice done, these two nineteenth-century Methodist women poured out their lives their “calling to fulfill.” How, we might ask, did they conceive of their calling? How did they justify their efforts for social justice to their conservative audiences and get others to embrace the call? Willard, as educator and leader of the Women’s Christian Temperance Union, and Laura Haviland, as reformer and activist, resembled one another in significant ways, despite their different locations on the Methodist family tree. Most importantly, they each believed that working for the betterment of others’ lives was their Christian duty, so their political agitation and practical service flowed from their own Christian commitments. Despite their own involvement in radical efforts to ameliorate poverty, illiteracy and injustice of various forms, they each managed to stay connected to the conservative Protestantism from which they came. They differed considerably in the focus of their work, however; while Willard directed her energy to improving lives of women, Haviland mainly addressed her efforts to African Americans, both men and women, first as they navigated their escape from slavery and later as they sought to build new lives for themselves. -
North Columbus Friends Meeting Woman's Suffrage Movement Time
North Columbus Friends Meeting Woman’s Suffrage Movement Time Line 1787: The US Constitutional Convention places voting qualifications in the hands of the state. Women in all states except New Jersey lose the right to vote. 1807: New Jersey revokes women’s right to vote. 1820: Elizabeth Margaret Chandler begins writing about women’s equality and was one of the earliest women Friends to speak out publicly against slavery. 1832: Chandler and Laura Smith Haviland, help to organize the Logan Female Anti-Slavery Society in Michigan. 1833: Lucretia Mott and others organized the Philadelphia Female Anti-Slavery Society 1837: First Anti-Slavery Convention of American Women, held in New York City 1838: The second Anti-Slavery Convention of American Women, held in Philadelphia 1840: Lucretia Mott and Elizabeth Cady Stanton are barred from attending the World Anti- Slavery Convention held in London. This prompts them to hold a convention in the US 1848: The first women’s rights convention is held in Seneca Falls, NY. Women’s suffrage is proposed by Stanton and agreed to after an impassioned speech by Frederick Douglass. 1848: Elizabeth Cady Stanton writes “The Declaration of Sentiments,” creating the agenda of women’s activism for decades to come. 1850: The first National Woman’s Rights Convention is held in Worcester, Massachusetts, with more than 11,000 participants from 11 states. 1851: The second National Women’s Rights Convention, again in Worcester, Mass. 1851: At a women’s rights convention in Akron, Ohio, Sojourner Truth delivers her memorable speech, “Ain’t I a woman?” 1861-1865: During the Civil War, efforts for the suffrage movement are minimal. -
First Michigan Volunteer Infantry Regiment (Three Months) Receiving Its Colors from the Ladies of Detroit
First Michigan – Three Months Volunteer Infantry Regiment “Thank God for Michigan!” It is confidently expected that the patriotic citizen soldiery of Michigan will promptly come forward to enlist in the cause of the Union, against which an extensive rebellion in arms exists, threatening the integrity and perpetuity of the government.1 Governor and Commander-in-Chief Austin Blair April 16, 1861 On April 12, 1861, the first guns of the Civil War were fired on Fort Sumter. On April 15, Governor Austin only three days later, Lincoln appealed to the “loyal” states for help in putting down the Blair rebellion, calling for 75,000 volunteers to serve for three months.2 Governor Austin Blair received the War Department’s telegram at his home in Jackson, advising him of Lincoln’s call to arms and informing him of Michigan’s quota: one regiment consisting of ten companies, or about 1,000 men. Governor Blair immediately left for Detroit to confer with the state’s Adjutant General, John Robertson.3 The problem: how to recruit, organize, arm, equip and train a regiment as quickly as possible. There were no funds for such an undertaking. Michigan’s treasury in 1861 was nearly depleted. Prominent business and civic leaders around the state stepped forward, pledging $80,000 in loans to get Michigan’s war effort started.4 On April 16, one day after receiving the War Department’s telegram, Governor Blair called for volunteers. The response was wildly enthusiastic, marked by a massive war Adjutant General John Robertson 1 First Michigan – Three Months Volunteer Infantry Regiment Ypsilanti Light Guard, the Marshall Light Guard and the Hardee Cadets— rendezvoused at Fort Wayne to drill and train.7 Colonel Frank W. -
Appendices AJ
CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF WATERFORD MASTER PLAN __________ APPENDIX A – BACKGROUND STUDIES APPENDIX A: BACKGROUND STUDIES An inventory and analysis of background information on Waterford Township was prepared to serve as the foundation for building the Master Plan goals, objectives, and future land use designations. The background studies are intended to provide a clear understanding of the historical and current demographics of Waterford. Basic comparative analyses between Waterford, surrounding communities, and Oakland County are also included to provide a better understanding of Waterford’s status within the surrounding region. Projections of likely future trends and characteristics were developed to offer insight into Waterford’s progress and development as a community during the next twenty years. The background studies are analyses of the following topics: Population Housing Income Economic Conditions Tax Base Employment Education Environmental Resources Historic District and Preservation Existing Land Use & Zoning In addition, background information on community and recreational facilities were reviewed and analyzed in Appendix O and the Township’s transportation issues are addressed in Appendices L, M, and N. POPULATION Historical Trend The 2000 Census population of Waterford Township is 73,150. This represents a population gain of 6,458 people since 1990, or a growth rate of 9.68 percent. The Township's population constitutes nearly six percent of the county's population of 1,194,156. Table A-1 shows that Waterford experienced its highest growth prior to 1970 and mirrored the growth and development patterns of Oakland County. In Table A-2, the significant growth in population occurring in communities surrounding the Township in the period from 1970 to 2000 is shown. -
Historical Society of Michigan Michigan History Calendar
Historical Society of Michigan Michigan History Calendar Day Year Events 1 APR 1840 The Morris Canal and Banking Company defaulted on payments on Michigan's internal improvement bonds. Michigan's fiscal reputation was ruined when it refused to honor bonds that had been sold, but for which the state had not received payment. 1 APR 1889 The Moiles brothers of De Tour avoided foreclosure of their sawmill by loading all the machinery on 2 barges and taking it to Canada. 1 APR 1901 The last known mastodon to live in Michigan died at the John Ball Zoological Park in Grand Rapids. 1 APR 1906 The state’s first yellow-pages directory was issued by the Michigan State Telephone Company in Detroit. 1 APR 1963 Voters approved Michigan’s fourth state constitution. It replaced the 1908 constitution, changing the terms of the governor and state senators to 4 years. 1 APR 1976 Conrail, a government corporation taking over bankrupt Eastern railroads, began operations in Michigan. The state offered subsidies to private lines operating some former Penn Central and Ann Arbor Railroad lines. 2 APR 1881 Grand Opening of J.L. Hudson’s men and boy’s clothing store in the Detroit Opera House. At start of the Great Depression Hudson’s with its 25 story building was the largest in Michigan and the third largest department store in the country. 2 APR 1966 The first of 850,000 Coho salmon were planted in the Platte River in Benzie County. Salmon stimulated fishing and helped the state deal with alewives that had entered the lakes through the Saint Lawrence Seaway. -
1315 Duke Street Alexandria , Virginia
BUILDING AND PROPERTY HISTORY 1315 DUKE STREET ALEXANDRIA , VIRGINIA BENJAMIN A. SKOLNIK , PHD ALEXANDRIA ARCHAEOLOGY OFFICE OF HISTORIC ALEXANDRIA CITY OF ALEXANDRIA , VIRGINIA JANUARY 2021 1315 Duke Street – Building and Property History FRANKLIN AND ARMFIELD OFFICE NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK REFERENCE NUMBER : 78003146 VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HISTORIC RESOURCES ARCHITECTURE ID 100-0105 ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCE SITE NUMBER : 44AX0075 Cover image: Front of "slave pen," Alexandria, Va., Russell, Andrew J., photographer, [between 1861- 1865], Library of Congress, https://www.loc.gov/item/2006683273/ . See Figure 89. Office of Historic Alexandria P a g e | 2 City of Alexandria, Virginia 1315 Duke Street – Building and Property History CONTENTS SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................. 9 RESIDENCE (1812– 1828) ....................................................................................................................... 11 FRANKLIN & ARMFIELD (1828-1837) ............................................................................................... 20 GEORGE KEPHART & CO., ET AL. (1837-1859) .............................................................................. 53 PRICE, BIRCH, & CO. (1859-1861) ....................................................................................................... 86 MILITARY OCCUPATION DURING THE CIVIL WAR (1861-1866) ............................................. 91 BOARDING HOUSE -
Final Armory Historic Context
FINAL ARMORY HISTORIC CONTEXT ARMY NATIONAL GUARD NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU June 2008 FINAL HISTORIC CONTEXT STUDY Prepared for: Army National Guard Washington, DC Prepared by: Burns & McDonnell Engineering Company, Inc Engineers-Architects-Consultants Kansas City, Missouri And Architectural and Historical Research, LLC Kansas City, Missouri Below is the Disclaimer which accompanied the historic context when submitted to the NGB in draft form in 2005. Due to reorganization of the document prior to its finalization, the section in which Burns & McDonnell references below has been changed and is now Section II of the document, which is written in its entirety by Ms. Renee Hilton, Historical Services Division, Office of Public Affairs &Strategic Communications, National Guard Bureau. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION, BACKGROUND, AND METHODOLOGY ........................... 1-1 1.1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 BACKGROUND............................................................................................. 1-1 1.3 SURVEY BOUNDARIES AND RESOURCES ............................................... 1-2 1.4 SURVEY OBJECTIVES................................................................................. 1-2 1.5 METHODOLOGY .......................................................................................... 1-3 1.6 REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS.............................................................. 1-4 1.7 HISTORIC INTEGRITY ................................................................................