Fall 1998 200 East Area Biological Vector Contamination Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Fall 1998 200 East Area Biological Vector Contamination Report HNF-3628 Fall 1998 200 East Area Biological Vector Contamination Report Date Published March 1999 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy FLUOR DANIEL HANFORD, INC, Richland, Washington 9 Hanford Management and Integration Contractor for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC06-96RL13200 Approved for Public Release LEGAL DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, nor any of their contractors, subcontractors or their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or any third party's use or the results of such use of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof or its contractors or subcontractors. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. This report has been reproduced from the best available copy. Available in paper copy and microfiche. Available to the U.S. Department of Energy and its contractors from U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI) P.O. Box 62 Oak Ridge, TN 37831 {615) 576-8401 Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce National Technical Information Service (NT1S) 5285 Port Royal Road Springfield, VA 22161 (703) 487-4650 Printed in thB United States of America DISCLM-1.CHP (8-95) RELEASE AUTHORIZATION Document Number. : HNF-3628, Rev. 0 Document Fall 1998 200 East Area Biological Vector Title: Contamination Report This document, reviewed in accordance with DOE Order 241.1, "Scientific and Technical Information Management," and DOE G 241.1-1, "Guide to the Management of Scientific and Technical Information," does not contain classified or sensitive unclassified information and is: APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE 3/17/99 Lockheed Martin Services, Inc. Document Control/Information Clearance Reviewed for Applied Technology, Business Sensitive, Classified, Copyrighted, Export Controlled, Patent, Personal/Private, Proprietary, Protected CRADA, Trademark, Unclassified Controlled Nuclear Information. LEGAL DISCLAIMER. This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, not any of their employees, nor any of their contractors, subcontractors or their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or any third party's use or the results of such use of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof or its contractors or subcontractors. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. This report has been reproduced from the best available copy. Printed in the United States of America. A-6001-400.2 (09/94) This page intentionally left blank. iv HNF-3628 Fall 1998 200 East Area Biological Vector Contamination Report Approvaröy: R. L. ShOUp Date Vice President, Fluor Daniel Hanford, Inc. Environment, Safety, Health and Quality Zônctérence By: ' J. E. Mecca Date Deputy Assistant Manager, Facility Transition U.S. Department of Energy Richland Operations Office FLUOR DANIEL HANFORD, INC. Richland, Washington Hanford Management and Integration Contractor for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC06-96RL13200 This page intentionally left blank. vi Fall 1998 200 East Area Biological Vector Contamination Report HNF-3628 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office, and Fluor Daniel Hanford, Inc. (FDH), offer their sincere appreciation and gratitude to those who cooperated and assisted during the events of the Fall of 1998 that are documented in the following report. Specifically, we thank and commend the City of Richland, the personnel at the City of Richland Landfill, and the Washington State Department of Health. We also thank the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Bechtel Hanford, Inc., and Project Hanford Management Contract team members. They were instrumental in helping FDH and the Hanford Site respond to this incident and identify lessons learned relative to the discovery of a new biological vector for the spread of contamination. The recognition extended to these organizations also encompasses their cooperation in reviewing and commenting on this document. The lessons learned from this event are intended for use not only by the Hanford Site, but also by other U.S. Department of Energy sites and other interested parties. March 18, 1999 vii Fall 1998 200 East Area Biological Vector Contamination Report HNF-3628 This page intentionally left blank. March 18, 1999 viii Fall 1998 200 East Area Biological Vector Contamination Report HNF-3628 PROLOGUE On September 28 and 29, 1998, a biological vector (fruit flies) not previously identified with radioactive contamination within the U.S. Department of Energy complex spread contamination at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington. The contamination was spread from a radioactive waste-transfer-piping diversion pit to clean refuse, which was then transported to the nearby municipal landfill for disposal. This report describes the events leading up to the discovery of the contamination release from the pit, the transfer of contamination by fruit flies, transfer to the landfill via normal refuse disposal activities, and the associated response activities. This response included the actions taken by the U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office, and the Project Hanford Management Contract team, working with regulators and City of Richland officials to track, investigate, mitigate, and eliminate the contamination spread. Workers and the public did not receive any radiation dose from this event. The contamination spread was found to have originated in the 200 East Area, located in the center of the Hanford Site. It is believed that fruit flies were attracted to a sucrose-basedfixative applied to the inside of a contaminated concrete diversion pit to control smearable radiological contamination before work was initiated inside the pit. After eggs were laid in the sweet mixture by the insects, they hatched, matured, and spread contamination in the pit to nearby mobile office lunchroom refuse and dumpsters. This contaminated refuse was picked up during normal disposal activities and hauled by compactor garbage truck to the City of Richland Landfill. On discovery of the contamination during daily surveys of the mobile office lunchroom, Hanford Site workers immediately implemented contamination-containment and vector-elimination activities. A strong focus was placed on protecting the health and safety of the workers, the public, and the environment. Equally important is that radioactive contamination subsequently discovered at the City of Richland Landfill was recovered with no radiation exposure impacts. This type of biological vector-borne incident appeared to be unique, based on the circumstances. However, routine monitoring and strict controls must be applied to ensure that the health and safety of the workers, the public, and the environment are not jeopardized or compromised. Other sites should review existing practices to see if similar conditions exist, and they should incorporate monitoring and controls for this type of vector. Based on this recent incident, U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office, and Project Hanford Management Contract organizations are reconfirming the processes and resources used to identify, control, and recover from such a biological vector-borne radiological contamination event. The Hanford Site incident highlighted the following conclusions that may apply to other U.S. Department ofEnergy sites with the potential for such incidents. • Identification of possible new biological vectors needs to be integrated into work and survey planning. • Biological vector surveillance and proactive control of waste-handling operations should be integrated with radiological, hazardous, and dangerous material control programs. • A graded approach to handling refuse according to its point of generation may be warranted, based on the potential for radioactive contamination spread. • When municipal landfills are used for refuse disposal, the primary line of defense to prevent the inadvertent release of radiological material is the existing radiological, hazardous, and dangerous material control programs. This includes both administrative and engineering controls at the point of generation of refuse. March 18, 1999 Fall 1998 200 East Area Biological Vector Contamination Report HNF-3628 This page intentionally left blank.
Recommended publications
  • Microsoft Outlook
    Emails pertaining to Gateway Pacific Project For April 2013 From: Jane (ORA) Dewell <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, April 01, 2013 8:12 AM To: '[email protected]'; Skip Kalb ([email protected]); John Robinson([email protected]); Brian W (DFW) Williams; Cyrilla (DNR) Cook; Dennis (DNR) Clark; Alice (ECY) Kelly; Loree' (ECY) Randall; Krista Rave-Perkins (Rave- [email protected]); Jeremy Freimund; Joel Moribe; 'George Swanaset Jr'; Oliver Grah; Dan Mahar; [email protected]; Scott Boettcher; Al Jeroue ([email protected]); AriSteinberg; Tyler Schroeder Cc: Kelly (AGR) McLain; Cliff Strong; Tiffany Quarles([email protected]); David Seep ([email protected]); Michael G (Env Dept) Stanfill; Bob Watters ([email protected]); [email protected]; Jeff Hegedus; Sam (Jeanne) Ryan; Wayne Fitch; Sally (COM) Harris; Gretchen (DAHP) Kaehler; Rob (DAHP) Whitlam; Allen E (DFW) Pleus; Bob (DFW) Everitt; Jeffrey W (DFW) Kamps; Mark (DFW) OToole; CINDE(DNR) DONOGHUE; Ginger (DNR) Shoemaker; KRISTIN (DNR) SWENDDAL; TERRY (DNR) CARTEN; Peggy (DOH) Johnson; Bob (ECY) Fritzen; Brenden (ECY) McFarland; Christina (ECY) Maginnis; Chad (ECY) Yunge; Douglas R. (ECY) Allen; Gail (ECY) Sandlin; Josh (ECY) Baldi; Kasey (ECY) Cykler; Kurt (ECY) Baumgarten; Norm (ECY) Davis; Steve (ECY) Hood; Susan (ECY) Meyer; Karen (GOV) Pemerl; Scott (GOV) Hitchcock; Cindy Zehnder([email protected]); Hallee Sanders; [email protected]; Sue S. PaDelford; Mary Bhuthimethee; Mark Buford ([email protected]); Greg Hueckel([email protected]); Mark Knudsen ([email protected]); Skip Sahlin; Francis X. Eugenio([email protected]); Joseph W NWS Brock; Matthew J NWS Bennett; Kathy (UTC) Hunter; ([email protected]); Ahmer Nizam; Chris Regan Subject: GPT MAP Team website This website will be unavailable today as maintenance is completed.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the SCEC Final Report (Pdf Format)
    Seattle Commission on Electronic Communication Steve Clifford Michele Lucien Commission Chair Fisher Communications/KOMO-TV Former CEO, KING Broadcasting Betty Jane Narver Rich Lappenbusch University of Washington Commission Vice Chair Microsoft Amy Philipson UWTV David Brewster Town Hall Vivian Phillips Family Business Margaret Gordon University of Washington Josh Schroeter Founder, Blockbuy.com Bill Kaczaraba NorthWest Cable News Ken Vincent KUOW Radio Norm Langill One Reel Jean Walkinshaw KCTS-TV Commission Staff City Staff Anne Fennessy Rona Zevin Cocker Fennessy City of Seattle Kevin Evanto JoanE O’Brien Cocker Fennessy City of Seattle Table of Contents Final Report Letter from the Commission Chair ......................................................................... 2 Executive Summary .................................................................................................. 3 Diagram of TV/Democracy Portal.......................................................................... 4 Commission Charge & Process ............................................................................... 6 Current Environment................................................................................................. 8 Recommended Goal, Mission Statement & Service Statement...................... 13 Commission Recommendations ............................................................................ 14 Budget & Financing ................................................................................................ 24 Recommended
    [Show full text]
  • Section 9202 Joint Information Center Manual
    Section 9202 Joint Information Center Manual Communicating during Environmental Emergencies Northwest Area: Washington, Oregon, and Idaho able of Contents T Section Page 9202 Joint Information Center Manual ........................................ 9202-1 9202.1 Introduction........................................................................................ 9202-1 9202.2 Incident Management System.......................................................... 9202-1 9202.2.1 Functional Units .................................................................. 9202-1 9202.2.2 Command ............................................................................ 9202-1 9202.2.3 Operations ........................................................................... 9202-1 9202.2.4 Planning .............................................................................. 9202-1 9202.2.5 Finance/Administration....................................................... 9202-2 9202.2.6 Mandates ............................................................................. 9202-2 9202.2.7 Unified Command............................................................... 9202-2 9202.2.8 Joint Information System .................................................... 9202-3 9202.2.9 Public Records .................................................................... 9202-3 9202.3 Initial Information Officer – Pre-JIC................................................. 9202-3 9202.4 Activities of Initial Information Officer............................................ 9202-4
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Delegate Selection Plan
    Delegate Selection Plan For the 2020 Democratic National Convention Issued by the Washington State Democratic Party (The State Democratic Chair shall be empowered to make any technical revisions to this document as required by the DNC Rules and Bylaws Committee to correct any omissions and/or deficiencies as found by the DNC Rules and Bylaws Committee to ensure its full compliance with Party Rules. (Reg. 2.5, Reg. 2.6 & Reg. 2.7)) 1 The Washington State Delegate Selection Plan For the 2020 Democratic National Convention Table of Contents SECTION I INTRODUCTION & DESCRIPTION OF DELEGATE SELECTION PROCESS ....................................3 SECTION II PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES ...............................................................................................8 SECTION III SELECTION OF DELEGATES AND ALTERNATES ....................................................................9 SECTION IV NATIONAL CONVENTION STANDING COMMITTEE MEMBERS .......................................... 33 SECTION V THE DELEGATION ............................................................................................................ 37 SECTION VI PRESIDENTIAL ELECTORS ................................................................................................ 38 SECTION VII GENERAL PROVISIONS AND PROCEDURAL GUARANTEES ................................................ 41 SECTION VIII AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, OUTREACH AND INCLUSION PLAN ............................................. 45 SECTION IX CHALLENGES .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Exhibit 15 a TT .....•..• C" • •• Q
    Exhibit 15 A TT .....•..• c" • •• q .........""....• i(:ji~. ..",.·:.~.E"ti~r~~S (!.)' .~.". I. ChicagoLand Television January 1, 1993 Chicago, IL, its suburbs, and northwest 1.7 million Tribune Indiana 2. NYI September 8, 1992 five boroughs ofNew York, NY 1.5 million Time Warner Cable 3. Texas Cable News January 1, 1999 Dallas-Fort Worth, Houston, and San 1.3 million Belo Antonio 4. New England Cable News March 1992 New England communities 2.8 million AT&T Broadband and the Hearst Corporation 5. NorthWest Cable News December 18, 1995 Washington, Oregon, Idaho, western 2.3 million Belo Montana, Alaska, and northern California 6. News 12 Long Island December 15, 1986 Nassau and Suffolk counties 800,000 Rainbow Media Holdings, Inc. 7. News 8 Austin September 13, 1999 Central Texas 300,000 Time Warner Cable 8. NewsChannel 8 October 7, 1991 Washington, D.C. metro area 1.1 million Allbritton Communications Co. 9. News 14 Carolina late 2001 Raleigh, Durham, Chapel Hill, 448,000 Time Warner Cable Fayetteville, Goldsboro, and surrounding areas 10. RNews April 22, 1990 An 11 county area in upstate New York 325,000 Time Warner Cable II. Capital News 9 October 11, 2002 Albany, NY 325,000 Time Warner Cable 12. BayNews 9 September 24, 1997 Tampa, FL 900,000 Time Warner Cable 13. Local News on Cable February 24, 1997 Norfolk, VA area 394,000 Belo, Landmark Communications, and Cox 14. Arizona News Channel November 4, 1996 Phoenix, AZ area 420,000 MAC American Communications and Cox 15. NewsWatch on Channel 15 October 1998 New Orleans, LA area 326,000 Belo 16.
    [Show full text]
  • Programmer Tyingiproblem Examples
    Programmer TyingIProblem Examples KGW (Portland Channel 8-Local NBC affiliate) retransmission negotiations- they required Canby Telephone Association, dba Canby Telcom ("Canby") to take NBC Weather Plus (along with Northwest Cable News which Canby Telcom already carried). Canby did not need nor did Canby want another weather channel. NFL Network required that if Canby took their programming package, we had to put it on our basic tier and not on a different tier, such as a sports tier. Canby could not afford the cost of paying for all of our subscribers and asked to be allowed to put it on a tier for which we could charge for those that wanted the NFL Network, in order to cover the additional cost. NFL Network refused to negotiate or return Canby's calls. Comcast SportsNet- has acquired the rights to broadcast the majority of the NBA Portland Trailblazer games. As with the NFL Network, Comcast also required that Canby put their channel on our basic tier (excluding lifeline) and would not negotiate to allow us to put their programming on a sports tier, where we could charge those who wanted to view the NBA games. They would not negotiate with Canby. In both the NFL and Comcast SportsNet situations Canby wanted to add these channels, but Canby could not afford to pay for this programming as an additional expense within the basic tier, nor could Canby justify increasing rates to all customers to cover the added cost, whether the customer wanted the sports programming or not. We had hoped to provide choice to our customers.
    [Show full text]
  • On Press Online
    ON PRESS ONLINE Annual Report 1999 The Financial Chairman’s Belo Belo Belo Operating Corporate Financial Company Highlights Letter Properties Interactive Companies Information Information 1 2 3 8 12 16 30 31 Belo is one of the nation’s largest diversified media companies with a superior group of television broadcasting, newspaper publishing, cable news and interactive media assets. Belo enters the 21st Century with more than 157 years of experience in providing quality news and information to viewers and readers, and a long-standing commitment to community service and journalistic excellence. the company Belo is distinctively positioned as an industry leader in an ever-changing media environment. Committed to the standards of excellence that have shaped the Company’s achievements, Belo is focused on the future and the technological advancements that continue to make ours the most exciting business in the world today. 1 financial highlights Year ended December 31 (in thousands, except per share amounts) Revenues 1999 1998 1997 Broadcasting $ 598,637 (a) $ 593,426 $ 522,560 Newspaper Publishing 816,976 (b) 784,327 693,777 Interactive Media 6,520 3,214 718 Other 11,849 10,736 17,149 Net operating revenues $1,433,982 $1,391,703 $1,234,204 Earnings Broadcasting $ 143,200 (a) $ 143,751 (d) $ 136,715 Newspaper Publishing 176,985 (b) 138,289 (e) 154,612 Interactive Media (8,908) (2,778) (1,584) Other (7,726) (5,212) (9,237) Corporate Expenses (39,056) (40,965) (39,704) Earnings from operations $ 264,495 $ 233,085 $ 240,802 Operating Cash Flow
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 State of the News Media Report
    Overview By Tom Rosenstiel and Amy Mitchell of the Project for Excellence in Journalism By several measures, the state of the American news media improved in 2010. After two dreadful years, most sectors of the industry saw revenue begin to recover. With some notable exceptions, cutbacks in newsrooms eased. And while still more talk than action, some experiments with new revenue models began to show signs of blossoming. Among the major sectors, only newspapers suffered continued revenue declines last year—an unmistakable sign that the structural economic problems facing newspapers are more severe than those of other media. When the final tallies are in, we estimate 1,000 to 1,500 more newsroom jobs will have been lost—meaning newspaper newsrooms are 30% smaller than in 2000. Beneath all this, however, a more fundamental challenge to journalism became clearer in the last year. The biggest issue ahead may not be lack of audience or even lack of new revenue experiments. It may be that in the digital realm the news industry is no longer in control of its own future. News organizations — old and new — still produce most of the content audiences consume. But each technological advance has added a new layer of complexity—and a new set of players—in connecting that content to consumers and advertisers. In the digital space, the organizations that produce the news increasingly rely on independent networks to sell their ads. They depend on aggregators (such as Google) and social networks (such as Facebook) to bring them a substantial portion of their audience. And now, as news consumption becomes more mobile, news companies must follow the rules of device makers (such as Apple) and software developers (Google again) to deliver their content.
    [Show full text]
  • USA National
    USA National Hartselle Enquirer Alabama Independent, The Newspapers Alexander Islander, The City Outlook Andalusia Star Jacksonville News News Anniston Star Lamar Leader Birmingham News Latino News Birmingham Post-Herald Ledger, The Cullman Times, The Daily Marion Times-Standard Home, The Midsouth Newspapers Daily Mountain Eagle Millbrook News Monroe Decatur Daily Dothan Journal, The Montgomery Eagle Enterprise Ledger, Independent Moundville The Florence Times Daily Times Gadsden Times National Inner City, The Huntsville Times North Jefferson News One Mobile Register Voice Montgomery Advertiser Onlooker, The News Courier, The Opelika- Opp News, The Auburn News Scottsboro Over the Mountain Journal Daily Sentinel Selma Times- Pelican, The Journal Times Daily, The Pickens County Herald Troy Messenger Q S T Publications Tuscaloosa News Red Bay News Valley Times-News, The Samson Ledger Weeklies Abbeville Sand Mountain Reporter, The Herald Advertiser Gleam, South Alabamian, The Southern The Atmore Advance Star, The Auburn Plainsman Speakin' Out News St. Baldwin Times, The Clair News-Aegis St. Clair BirminghamWeekly Times Tallassee Tribune, Blount Countian, The The Boone Newspapers Inc. The Bulletin Centreville Press Cherokee The Randolph Leader County Herald Choctaw Thomasville Times Tri Advocate, The City Ledger Tuskegee Clanton Advertiser News, The Union Clarke County Democrat Springs Herald Cleburne News Vernon Lamar Democrat Conecuh Countian, The Washington County News Corner News Weekly Post, The County Reaper West Alabama Gazette Courier
    [Show full text]
  • Andrea Nakano C/O Napoli Management Group 8844 West Olympic Boulevard, Suite 100 Beverly Hills, California 90211
    Andrea Nakano c/o Napoli Management Group 8844 West Olympic Boulevard, Suite 100 Beverly Hills, California 90211 CAREER SUMMARY Emmy Award-winning sports anchor/reporter with an extensive background in daily deadline story development, live sportscast production, and live field coverage, with fifteen years experience. EDUCATION San Francisco State University Stanford University San Francisco, California Palo Alto, California Bachelor of Arts in Broadcast Communication Mass Media Institute Summer Program American School in Japan Tokyo, Japan Diploma PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Freelance Sports /Reporter Spring 2013 to Present Comcast SportsNet-Bay Area (NBC Sports), San Francisco, California Freelance field sports coverage as assigned for the Bay Area regional sports network. Sports Anchor/Reporter February 2010 to February 2013 KING-TV/KONG-TV/Northwest Cable News (Belo Corp.), Seattle, Washington Weekend sports anchor and reporter responsible for managing all weekend sports live programming on three combined Belo stations. Host weekly MLS Sounders FC Weekly Show including writing and editing features for the show. Report weekdays, covering Seahawks, Mariners, and college sports including Pac 12 teams including the University of Washington and Washington State. Contribute and anchor daily 30 minute Northwest Sports Tonight show, which includes highlights, guest sports interviews Sports Anchor/Reporter February 2007 to March 2009 XETV-TV, San Diego, California Anchor/reporter of Friday/Saturday sports segment. Also produced, wrote and edited the segment. Co-host of 30-minute “That Sunday Sports Show”. General Assignment Reporter October 2003 to February 2007 KFMB-TV, San Diego, California Reported live with packages for the noon, 4, 5 and 6:30pm newscasts. Emphasis on breaking news.
    [Show full text]
  • Becktv and TEGNA Media Collaborate in Relocating Seattle Stations to New Broadcast Facilities in Popular Sodo Area
    Agency Contact: BeckTV Contact: Elisabetta Fernandez Kelly Bell Landgraf Wall Street Communications Corporate Office Manager Tel: +1 (503) 577-3125 Tel: +1 (512) 252-7555 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Photo Links: www.wallstcom.com/BeckTV/BeckTV_KING5-First-Air-BTS-Jerry-and-Lois.jpg www.wallstcom.com/BeckTV/BeckTV-King5_News_Studio.jpg Photo Caption: King-5 News Studio For Immediate Release BeckTV and TEGNA Media Collaborate in Relocating Seattle Stations to New Broadcast Facilities in Popular SoDo Area AUSTIN, Texas — Aug. 9, 2016 — BeckTV, one of the United States’ premier design-build systems integrators, has completed the relocation of the TEGNA Media-owned stations KING, KONG, and 24-hour regional news channel Northwest Cable News (NWCN) to a newly remodeled building located across town in Seattle’s SoDo neighborhood and adjacent to the home fields of the city’s Major League Baseball and National Football League teams, the Mariners and Seahawks. Collaborating with TEGNA Media on the design and build of broadcast facilities within “Home Plate Center,” BeckTV assisted with programming, space planning, broadcast system design, broadcast budget development, and system integration to enable a rapid transition to more robust and innovative facilities. “Working closely with BeckTV, we designed and built our robust, flexible technical TV facilities ahead of schedule and smoothly cut our broadcast channels over to the beautifully designed new SoDo space two weeks earlier than originally planned,” said Dick Trumbo, technology manager at KING5. “BeckTV not only aided us in negotiating the complexity of busy production schedules and in establishing a floor plan conducive to better collaboration and greater efficiency, but also saved us time and money in moving from our old building.” From its highly visible position near popular sports and social gathering venues, Home Plate Center transmits three primary master control channels including the No.
    [Show full text]
  • Comcast 2008 Annual Report – Final.Doc
    Report to the Clark County Board of Commissioners And Vancouver City Council From the City/County Telecommunications Commission PROGRESS REPORT ON THE COMCAST CORPORATION VANCOUVER/CLARK COUNTY FRANCHISE AGREEMENT May 2009 I. INTRODUCTION - BACKGROUND This is the Twenty-Seventh Annual Report by the Vancouver/Clark County Telecommunications Commission ("Commission") reviewing the status of the franchise agreement with the cable television operator, TCI of Southern Washington ("TCI"), doing business as Comcast Corporation (“Comcast”). This is the twelfth Annual Report since a 10-year franchise agreement with TCI, now Comcast, was adopted in November 1997. In June 2002, the City of Vancouver (“City”) and Clark County (“County”) extended the franchise agreements with Comcast an additional 5-years, through December 31, 2012. The 2008 Annual Report is consistent with the format for the previous evaluations of the cable operator's performance (1981-1986 Cox Cable; June 1986-1995 Columbia Cable; December 1995-1998 TCI; 1999-February 2003 AT&T Broadband; and now Comcast Corporation). The Commission's review focuses on the calendar year 2008 although, as appropriate, more recent developments and issues are noted. The Commission recognizes the importance of conducting annual reviews – not only as a franchise obligation, but also in light of changes in the marketplace, population growth in the Vancouver and Clark County area and the requirements of the Federal Cable Act to give an operator the opportunity to correct any franchise violations. The Commission understands that as a citizen advisory board it is responsible for the efficient and effective management and enforcement of the franchise. In addition, one of the most effective roles of the Commission through the years has been to inform various stakeholders – from the cable operator, to PEG access providers, to elected officials – about the needs and issues of interest to the community.
    [Show full text]