DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix a – Glossary and Acronyms

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix a – Glossary and Acronyms APPENDIX A – GLOSSARY AND ACRONYMS A.1 Glossary of Terms Definitions for most terminology used in this document may be found in the Forest Plan glossary. A few select terms are described below for easy reference. Advancing Front. The advancing front consists of that area where beech trees are infested with scale but not yet infected with Nectria . All of the east side of the Hiawatha is included in the advancing front. However, some stands in northwestern Chippewa County appear to have Nectria infection beginning on some trees. Nectria is not yet abundant, and no trees have died yet from Nectria, so these stands would not yet be considered to have entered the killing front. That transition may happen within as little as one year, or may take longer. These stands will likely be where the killing front arrives first. Arterial Roads. Road that provides service to large land areas and usually connect with public highways or other Forest Arterial roads to form an integrated network of primary travel routes. The location and standard often are determined by a demand for maximum mobility and travel efficiency rather than specific resource management service. It is usually developed and operated for long-term land and resource management purposes and constant service (FEIS, p. 6-2). Canopy. The continuous overhead formed from the uppermost spreading branchy layer of a forest. Canopy Gap. A small opening created in the canopy. Classified Road . Roads wholly or partially within or adjacent to national Forest system lands that are determined to be needed for long-term motor vehicle access. It includes state roads, county roads, privately-owned roads, NFS roads and other roads authorized by the Forest Service 936 CFR 212.1). Clearcut. A regeneration cut where all merchantable trees in the stand are cut. Clearcut with Reserves. A variant of the clearcut method in which varying numbers of reserve trees are retained to attain goals other than regeneration. The number of reserve trees retained is sufficient to create a two-aged, two-storied stand. Collector Road. Road that serves smaller land areas than an Arterial road and is usually connected to an arterial or public highway. It collects traffic from local roads. Its location and standard are influenced by both long-term multi-resource service needs and travel efficiency. Compartment. A unit of land with boundaries delineated by geographical features such as rivers, creeks, roads, and property boundaries for administrative purposes. Compartments are approximately 500-2,000 acres in size. Decommission Road. Activities that result in the stabilization and restoration of unneeded roads to a more natural state (FEIS, 6-11). Design Criteria. Site specific application of Forest Plan or other required standards or guidelines that are incorporated into the design of the project activity. A - 1 Appendix A – Glossary and Acronyms Desired Condition. A goal, as stated in the Forest Plan, as to what a specific area should look like in the future. Ecological Landtype (ELT). A framework that allows natural resource managers to identify, describe and map units of land with similar physical and biological characteristics at scales suitable for natural resources planning and management. (FEIS, Appendix I). Fire Regime Condition Class (FRCC). A landscape classification that determines departure of the current landscape conditions from the historic landscape conditions using vegetation type and fire dynamics. The three classes describe low (FRCC1), moderate (FRCC2), and high (FRCC3) departure from historic conditions. Fire Rotation (FR). The length of time necessary for an area equal to the entire area of interest to burn. Size of area of interest must be clearly specified. This definition does not imply that the entire area will burn during a cycle; some sites may burn several times and others not at all. In the Lake States, fires are generally more infrequent than those described by the national Fire Regimes. Cleland (2004) calculated replacement fire rotations at a scale more appropriate to Lake States landscapes. (FEIS, H-3) Forest Type Groups. A group of forest cover types used to define seral classes. The forest type groupings differ by ecological land types. Fuel Breaks. A break in the vegetation (Primarily the canopy) designed to stop, or slow a wildfire. A road corridor can be considered a fuel break because it has a wide corridor void of vegetation. Intermediate Harvest. Any treatment or tending designed to enhance growth, quality, vigor, and composition of the stand after establishment or regeneration and prior to final harvest. Intermittent Streams. A watercourse that flows in a well-defined channel for 20-90% of the year during normal rainfall conditions. Issue. A point of discussion or debate related to the proposed action. Landtype Association (LTA). An ecological unit that describes areas of common ecosystem characteristics and generally (but not always) numbering in the thousands of acres. Landtype associations are defined by similarities in general topography, geomorphic process, geology, soil and potential plant communities (FEIS, 6-7). Local Road. Connects terminal facilities (resources) with a Forest collector, arterial, or state highway. Its location and standards are usually controlled by a single specific resource activity rather than travel efficiency. Maintenance Levels (Roads). Each Forest System road is to be maintained to a level commensurate with the planned function and use of the road. The intended level of maintenance to be received by each road is termed the Objective maintenance level (OML), which are divided into five levels of maintenance intensity. OML-1 is the lowest level and OML-5 is the highest level (FEIS, 6-7). Management Area. A specific geographic location on the HNF where specific management direction will be applied. The HNF is divided into 21 potential management areas (FEIS, 6-7). A - 2 Appendix A – Glossary and Acronyms Management Indicator Species (MIS). Species whose presence in a certain location or situation, at a given population, indicate a given environmental condition. Their population changes are believed to indicate effects of management activities on a number of other species. Mitigation Measure. Includes avoiding an impact altogether by not taking a certain action or part of an action; minimizing an impact by limiting the degree or magnitude of an action and its implementation; rectifying the impact by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the affected environment; reducing or eliminating the impact over time by preservation and maintenance operations during the life of the action; or compensating for the impact by replacing or providing substitute resources or environments. Modification. A VQO meaning human activity may dominate the characteristic landscape but must at the same time utilize naturally established form, line, color, and texture. It should appear as a natural occurrence when viewed in the foreground. Monitoring. The collection of information over time, generally on a sample basis by measuring change in an indicator or variable, to determine the effects of resource management treatments in the long term. New Road Construction. Activity that results in the addition of forest classified or temporary road miles (36 CFR 212.1). Overstory Removal Cut . The cutting of trees constituting an upper canopy layer to release trees or other vegetation in an understory. Overstocked Stand. Any stand having more trees per acre or basal area higher than the average stocking as shown on Table 2400-1 Stocking Levels for Northern Hardwoods. Partial Removal Cut. Removal of only part of a stand for purposes other than regenerating a new age class. Partial Retention. A VQO which, in general, means human activities may be evident but must remain subordinate to the characteristic landscape (Forest Plan, E-13). Retention. A visual quality objective which, in general, means human activities are not evident to the casual forest visitor (Forest Plan, E-13). Road (Forest). A motor vehicle travelway over 50 inches wide, unless classified and managed as a trail. A road may be classified or unclassified (FEIS, 6-11). Road Closure. Process of closing a road to public vehicle traffic. Closures are used on system roads (roads intended for future use) to limit or prohibit particular types of travel (FEIS 6-11). Road Maintenance. The ongoing upkeep of a road necessary to retain or restore the road to the approved road maintenance objective (FSM 7712.3). Roaded Natural (RN). A classification of the Recreation Opportunity Spectrum that characterizes a predominantly natural environment with evidence of moderate permanent alternative resource and resource utilization. Evidence of the sights and sounds of human is moderate but in harmony with the natural environment. Opportunities exist for both social interaction and moderate isolation from sights and sounds of humans (Forest Plan, E-9). A - 3 Appendix A – Glossary and Acronyms Scoping. Involving the public in order to identify and focus attention on important matters early in an environmental analysis, resulting in informed decisions, cost-effective analysis and decision making, and increased credibility. Selection Cut. An uneven-aged regeneration cutting method where the objective is to maintain a multi- aged structure by removing some trees in all size classes either singly, in small groups or in strips (FEIS A-3). Semi-Primitive Motorized (SPM). A classification of the Recreation Opportunity Spectrum that characterizes
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Michigan Technological University Archives' Postcard Collection MTU-196
    Michigan Technological University Archives' Postcard Collection MTU-196 This finding aid was produced using ArchivesSpace on February 08, 2019. Description is in English Michigan Technological University Archives and Copper Country Historical Collections 1400 Townsend Drive Houghton 49931 [email protected] URL: http://www.lib.mtu.edu/mtuarchives/ Michigan Technological University Archives' Postcard Collection MTU-196 Table of Contents Summary Information .................................................................................................................................... 3 Biography ....................................................................................................................................................... 3 Collection Scope and Content Summary ....................................................................................................... 4 Administrative Information ............................................................................................................................ 4 Controlled Access Headings .......................................................................................................................... 4 Collection Inventory ....................................................................................................................................... 5 A ................................................................................................................................................................... 5 B ..................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Communities of Michigan: Classification and Description
    Natural Communities of Michigan: Classification and Description Prepared by: Michael A. Kost, Dennis A. Albert, Joshua G. Cohen, Bradford S. Slaughter, Rebecca K. Schillo, Christopher R. Weber, and Kim A. Chapman Michigan Natural Features Inventory P.O. Box 13036 Lansing, MI 48901-3036 For: Michigan Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Division and Forest, Mineral and Fire Management Division September 30, 2007 Report Number 2007-21 Version 1.2 Last Updated: July 9, 2010 Suggested Citation: Kost, M.A., D.A. Albert, J.G. Cohen, B.S. Slaughter, R.K. Schillo, C.R. Weber, and K.A. Chapman. 2007. Natural Communities of Michigan: Classification and Description. Michigan Natural Features Inventory, Report Number 2007-21, Lansing, MI. 314 pp. Copyright 2007 Michigan State University Board of Trustees. Michigan State University Extension programs and materials are open to all without regard to race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, marital status or family status. Cover photos: Top left, Dry Sand Prairie at Indian Lake, Newaygo County (M. Kost); top right, Limestone Bedrock Lakeshore, Summer Island, Delta County (J. Cohen); lower left, Muskeg, Luce County (J. Cohen); and lower right, Mesic Northern Forest as a matrix natural community, Porcupine Mountains Wilderness State Park, Ontonagon County (M. Kost). Acknowledgements We thank the Michigan Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Division and Forest, Mineral, and Fire Management Division for funding this effort to classify and describe the natural communities of Michigan. This work relied heavily on data collected by many present and former Michigan Natural Features Inventory (MNFI) field scientists and collaborators, including members of the Michigan Natural Areas Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Euconulus Alderi Gray a Land Snail
    Euconulus alderi, Page 1 Euconulus alderi Gray A land snail State Distribution Photo by Matthew Barthel and Jeffery C. Nekola Best Survey Period Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Status: State listed as Special Concern are smaller, have a more shiny luster, and a darker shell color. Also, the microscopic spiral lines on the base of Global and state ranks: G3Q/S2 the shell are stronger than the radial striations. This is reversed in E. fulvus (Nekola 1998). For more Family: Helicarionidae information on identifying land snails, see Burch and Jung (1988) pages 155-158 or Burch and Pearce (1990) Synonyms: none pages 211-218. Total range: The global range of Euconulus alderi Best survey time: Surveys for E. alderi are best includes Ireland, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the performed after rain, when the soil and vegetation are United States. Within the U.S. it has been found in moist. During dry periods, a survey site can appear Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, and completely devoid of snails, while after a rain the same Wisconsin (Frest 1990, NatureServe 2007, Nekola site can be found to contain numerous individuals. 1998). This species was not known from North Temperatures should be warm enough that the ground is America until 1986 when it was discovered in Iowa and not frozen and there is no snow. Dry, hot periods during Wisconsin (Frest 1990, Nekola 1998). mid-summer should be avoided. The best time of day to survey is often in early morning when conditions are State distribution: E.
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan Coastal and Estuarine Land Conservation Plan DRAFT April
    Michigan Coastal and Estuarine Land Conservation Plan DRAFT April 2008 Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Coastal Zone Management Program Table of Contents List of Figures......................................................................................................................................... iv I. Introduction a. Program background and federal requirements ..............................................................................1 b. Purpose and goals of Michigan’s CELC plan ..................................................................................2 II. Priorities for Coastal and Estuarine Protection a. Geographic extent of Michigan’s CELCP areas ..............................................................................2 b. Types of lands to be protected and the need for conservation of these resources.........................3 c. Project areas that represent Michigan’s priority areas for conservation..........................................6 d. Descriptions of existing plans, or elements thereof that are incorporated into Michigan’s plan......8 III. State Process for Implementing the CELCP a. Identification of state lead agency .................................................................................................13 b. List of state or local agencies, or types of agencies, that are eligible to hold title to property.......13 c. Description of the state’s project nomination process ...................................................................13 IV. Program Procedures and Coordination
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Evaluation REACH 3MC II Fiber Optic Project Merit Network, Inc
    Biological Evaluation REACH 3MC II Fiber Optic Project Merit Network, Inc. United States Department of Agriculture Hiawatha National Forest April 2012 Forest Service Eastern Region Hiawatha National Forest 2 Biological Evaluation REACH 3MC II Fiber Optic Project Merit Network, Inc. Hiawatha National Forest April 2012 /s/ Andrea Kline Prepared By: ____________________________ Andrea Kline Merit Network , Inc. Date: ___5/3/12___ /s/ Derek Huebner /s/ Stephanie Blumer Reviewed By: ____________________________ Reviewed By: _______________________________ Derek Huebner Stephanie Blumer Wildlife Biologist Botanist Date: _____5/7/12___ Date: __5/7/12_______ The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). The USDA is an equal opportunity
    [Show full text]
  • Border Security Threatens Northern Border Wildernesses
    Wilderness In Peril: Border Security Measures Threaten Wilderness along the Northern Border with Canada An Analysis Prepared by Wilderness Watch October 2012 Wilderness Watch P.O. Box 9175 Missoula, MT 59807 406-542-2048 www.wildernesswatch.org For more information, contact: George Nickas, Executive Director Kevin Proescholdt, Conservation Director [email protected] [email protected] 406-542-2048 612-201-9266 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary………………………………………………...…………….Page 3 Introduction………………………………………………………..………..….....Page 4 Background…………………………………………………..………………....…Page 4 A. Early 20th Century Border Easements B. International Boundary Treaties with Canada C. 2005 REAL ID Act D. 2006 Interagency Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) Border Patrol Practices on the Southern Border and Lessons for the North……………………………………………………………….Page 9 A. Border Wall Construction B. Illegal Roads and Vehicle Routes C. Border Security Infrastructure D. Motorized Patrols Emerging Major Threats to Wildernesses near the Northern Border……...…Page 13 A. Congressional Legislation B. Northern Border Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement C. 2006 MOU and Motorized Patrols D. Administrative Waiver of Federal Laws E. Clearing and Construction in Border Reservations F. Conclusion Needed Actions to Reestablish and Affirm Wilderness Protections Along the Northern Border……………………………………….……………..Page 17 A. Existing Homeland Security Laws B. 2006 MOU C. Northern Border PEIS D. Pending Legislation E. Restore Wilderness Protection Appendix - Wildernesses at Risk along the Northern Border………………....Page 18 3 Executive Summary Under the guise of border security, a plethora of new and proposed laws, policies, memoranda, and other governmental actions pose an unprecedented threat to Wildernesses, including in many national parks, along our nation’s Northern Border. This whitepaper describes the threats and presents several recommendations for securing the protection of Wilderness and parks along the Northern Border.
    [Show full text]
  • Shells of Maine: a Catalogue of the Land, Fresh-Water and Marine Mollusca of Maine
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Maine The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Maine History Documents Special Collections 1908 Shells of Maine: a Catalogue of the Land, Fresh-water and Marine Mollusca of Maine Norman Wallace Lermond Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/mainehistory Part of the History Commons This Monograph is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Maine History Documents by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Pamp 353 c. 2 Vickery SHELLS OF MAINE Norman Wallace Lermond Thomaston SHELLS OF MAINE. A Catalogue of the Land, Fresh-water and Marine Mollusca of Maine, by Norman Wallace Lermond. INTRODUCTORY. No general list of Maine shells—including land, fresh-water and marine species—-has been published since 1843, when Dr. J. W. Mighels’ list was printed in the Boston Journal of Natural History. Dr. Mighels may be called the “Pioneer” conchologist of Maine. By profession a physician, in his leisure hours he was a most enthusiastic collector and student of all forms of molluscan life. Enthusiasm such as his was “contagious” and he soon had gathered about him a little band of active students and collectors. Of these Capt. Walden of the U. S. Revenue Cutter “Morris” was dredging in deep water and exploring the eastern shores and among the islands, and “by his zeal procured many rare species;” Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter VII State Parks and Recreation Areas
    Chapter VII State Parks and Recreation Areas 7.1 Hunting or trapping in state parks or game refuges; designating where permissible; permits; hunting or trapping in state recreation areas. Sec. 7.1 (1) Except as otherwise provided in this chapter or by permit issued by the director, no person shall trap or hunt with firearms or dogs or in any other manner in any state park, state game refuge, or other lands under the control of and dedicated by the department as a game refuge or wildlife sanctuary. (2) Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, state recreation areas shall be open to hunting and trapping during established seasons. (3) Trapping in state recreation areas, except as otherwise provided in this chapter, and in state parks open to trapping, shall be limited to those areas at least 50 feet outside of the mowed portions of developed picnic areas, swimming beaches, parking lots, boat launches, children’s playground structures, campgrounds or headquarters’ areas. A duffer-type, egg-type, or similarly designed foothold trap for raccoon may be used within the exempted area only by written permission by the designated department representative. History: Eff. Mar 31, 1989; Am. 16, 1989, Eff. Aug 1, 1989; Am. 9, 2008 Eff. Jun 6, 2008; Am. 2, 2016, Eff. April 15, 2016; Am. 2, 2021, Eff. Mar. 12, 2021. 7.2 Repealed. Am. 2, 2016, Eff. April 15, 2016. Publishers note: The repealed section pertained to Brimley state park, hunting and trapping allowed. History: Eff. Mar 31, 1989; Am. 2, 2016, Eff. April 15, 2016. 7.3 Craig lake state park; hunting and trapping allowed.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1464 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1132
    § 1132 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION Page 1464 Department and agency having jurisdiction of, and reports submitted to Congress regard- thereover immediately before its inclusion in ing pending additions, eliminations, or modi- the National Wilderness Preservation System fications. Maps, legal descriptions, and regula- unless otherwise provided by Act of Congress. tions pertaining to wilderness areas within No appropriation shall be available for the pay- their respective jurisdictions also shall be ment of expenses or salaries for the administra- available to the public in the offices of re- tion of the National Wilderness Preservation gional foresters, national forest supervisors, System as a separate unit nor shall any appro- priations be available for additional personnel and forest rangers. stated as being required solely for the purpose of managing or administering areas solely because (b) Review by Secretary of Agriculture of classi- they are included within the National Wilder- fications as primitive areas; Presidential rec- ness Preservation System. ommendations to Congress; approval of Con- (c) ‘‘Wilderness’’ defined gress; size of primitive areas; Gore Range-Ea- A wilderness, in contrast with those areas gles Nest Primitive Area, Colorado where man and his own works dominate the The Secretary of Agriculture shall, within ten landscape, is hereby recognized as an area where years after September 3, 1964, review, as to its the earth and its community of life are un- suitability or nonsuitability for preservation as trammeled by man, where man himself is a visi- wilderness, each area in the national forests tor who does not remain. An area of wilderness classified on September 3, 1964 by the Secretary is further defined to mean in this chapter an area of undeveloped Federal land retaining its of Agriculture or the Chief of the Forest Service primeval character and influence, without per- as ‘‘primitive’’ and report his findings to the manent improvements or human habitation, President.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1517 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1131 (Pub. L
    Page 1517 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1131 (Pub. L. 88–363, § 10, July 7, 1964, 78 Stat. 301.) Sec. 1132. Extent of System. § 1110. Liability 1133. Use of wilderness areas. 1134. State and private lands within wilderness (a) United States areas. The United States Government shall not be 1135. Gifts, bequests, and contributions. liable for any act or omission of the Commission 1136. Annual reports to Congress. or of any person employed by, or assigned or de- § 1131. National Wilderness Preservation System tailed to, the Commission. (a) Establishment; Congressional declaration of (b) Payment; exemption of property from attach- policy; wilderness areas; administration for ment, execution, etc. public use and enjoyment, protection, preser- Any liability of the Commission shall be met vation, and gathering and dissemination of from funds of the Commission to the extent that information; provisions for designation as it is not covered by insurance, or otherwise. wilderness areas Property belonging to the Commission shall be In order to assure that an increasing popu- exempt from attachment, execution, or other lation, accompanied by expanding settlement process for satisfaction of claims, debts, or judg- and growing mechanization, does not occupy ments. and modify all areas within the United States (c) Individual members of Commission and its possessions, leaving no lands designated No liability of the Commission shall be im- for preservation and protection in their natural puted to any member of the Commission solely condition, it is hereby declared to be the policy on the basis that he occupies the position of of the Congress to secure for the American peo- member of the Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of the Portland Society of Natural History
    1 : .1 J <) U K N A L POET LAND SOCIETY NATURAL HISTORY Vol. 1. - - No. 1. PORTLAND STEPHEN I5EKRY, PRINTER. IStU. i^ \1 \ -_^ J52 JOURNAL PORTLAND SOCIETY OF NATURAL HISTORY, Art, I.— Ohservations on the Terrestrial Pulmonifera of Maine^ includmr/ a Catalogue of all the species of terrestrial and flu- viatile Mollusca known to inhabit the State. By Edward S. Morse. Twenty-one years ago, Dr. J. W. Mighels, then of Portland, presented to the Boston Society of Natural History a catalogue of the shells of Maine, which was accepted and published by them in the fourth volume of their Journal. Since that time the number of species of terrestrial and fluviatile Mollusca detected in the State has been nearly doubled. To make these additions known, I commenced the preparation of a simple catalogue. Such cata- logues, however brief, are of value in the study of geographical distribution, which is rapidly becoming an element of v^st import- ance in the study of Zoology. At the same time their value is greatly enhanced by observations concerning the relative scarcity or abundance, habits, etc., of each s^iecies. While making these brief notes, I was led to examine the subject still more closely. This paper, the result of that investigation, is offered as a first contribution to a more intimate knowledge of our native species. In the preparation of these pages I have received great assistance from W. G. Binney, Esq., of Burlington, New Jersey, to whom I feel under grateful obligations for aid, without which it Avould have been impossible to present certain species in the light recently thrown upon them by the labors of certain European writers.
    [Show full text]
  • 19-Tahquamenon, Waiska and St. Marys BCA Regional Unit
    19. Tahquamenon, Waiska and St. Marys HEALTHY WATERS REPORT CARD OFFSHORE NA ISLANDS A NEARSHORE C COASTAL WETLANDS C EMBAYMENTS & C COASTAL TERRESTRIAL A INSHORE TRIBUTARIES & C OVERALL B- WATERSHEDS Report card denotes general condition/health of each biodiversity target in the region based on condition/stress indices. See introduction to the regional summaries. A Ecologically desirable status; requires little intervention for Very maintenance Good B Within acceptable range of variation; may require some Good intervention for maintenance. C Outside of the range of acceptable variation and requires Fair management. If unchecked, the biodiversity target may be vulnerable to serious degradation. D Allowing the biodiversity target to remain in this condition for Poor an extended period will make restoration or preventing extirpation practically impossible. Unknown Insufficient information. The mouth of the Tahquamenon River. Photo provided by William Taft. Photo credit: David Kenyon/ Michigan Department of Natural Resources Summary/ Description The Tahquamenon, Waiska and St. Marys region (HUC 04020202, HUC 04020203 and HUC 04070001) extends from Emerson to Sault Ste Marie and the Michigan/Ontario border at the St. Marys River. It is 2,939.00 km2 in size, including the associated nearshore waters. It is part of Subregion 0402 – Southern Lake Superior-Lake Superior. The Bay Mills Indian Community is located in this regional unit. Waiska River and Bay, also known as Waishkey River and Bay, were originally named after an Ojibwe chief who signed several treaties on behalf of his band. His name was recorded on these documents variously as 'Wayishkey' and ’Wayishkee’. The descendants of this chief are still present in Bay Mills area and spell their name 'Waishkey’.
    [Show full text]