Comparing Film with Book

‘The Attack’: Comparing film with book “The Attack” is a powerful film, a must-see for those of us interested in Israel and the conflict with the Palestinians. I very much enjoyed meeting the Lebanese filmmaker, Ziad Doueiri, and wrote (in the Open Zion blog of the Daily Beast) of his evolution from hating Israelis into someone who could appreciate both sides of the conflict. Sadly, the fact that he depicts both sides realistically and filmed in Israel, working with Israeli-Jewish actors and crew (as well as Palestinians in Israel and the West Bank) has subjected him to vilification in the Arab world, where his film has been banned. Filmmaker Ziad Doueiri Interestingly, Doueiri knows the writer, Yasmina Khadra, who wrote the novel of the same name from which the film is drawn. Both currently live in Paris, where they occasionally get together socially. Novelist Yasmina Khadra It turns out that Khadra is the nom de plume for Mohammed Moulessehoul, a former Algerian army officer who wrote under his wife’s name while still a professional soldier. When he retired, he found it convenient to continue to write as Khadra, because he had already established a reputation with that name. Doueiri said that Khadra was initially upset that he had changed the ending of his book, but is now okay with it. On balance, I found the film somewhat more sympathetic toward Israel than the book. The book portrays Palestinian resistance to Israel’s invasion of the West Bank in April 2002; the author does not indicate that “Operation Defensive Shield” was Israel’s response to a series of devastating terror attacks. For example, it began a few days after an attack on a Passover seder at a hotel in Netanya, which killed 30 and injured 140. The film is not obvious about the exact time period of the eponymous attack, but there was an actual attack by a woman suicide bomber on a restaurant in Haifa, similar to the pivotal incident described in this story, in which the bomber also exploded herself in the midst of young children. The film comes closest to being placed during the Intifada in a scene in which the main character, Dr. Amin Jaafari, views the destroyed remains of the Jenin refugee camp where the IDF battled Palestinian fighters. This scene implies that there was a “massacre” there, as widely claimed and believed. But the truth is much less clear. This is from a Wikipedia article on Mohammad Bakri’s documentary, “Jenin, Jenin”: Human Rights Watch investigations found ‘no evidence to sustain claims of massacres or large-scale extrajudicial executions by the IDF in Jenin refugee camp'[,] although they reported that ‘Israeli forces committed serious violations of international humanitarian law…. Human Rights Watch estimates that between 53-56 Palestinians were killed during the Israeli offensive, just over half of them suspected to be armed combatants. Israel concurs that around 50 Palestinian died, but describes the event as a battle and blames civilian deaths on the close proximity of fighters and civilians. 23 Israeli soldiers died. The book begins and ends with a bloody Israeli attack in Jenin, which is completely excised from the plot of the film. Its inclusion might have made the movie more palatable to Arab audiences, but this might also have obscured the filmmaker’s focus upon the way in which the main character — a Palestinian of West Bank origin who is a naturalized Israeli citizen and a highly regarded surgeon living and working in Tel Aviv — has his life and sense of identity shattered by another violent event. This central conflict within the main character is further accentuated by the filmmaker’s decision to portray his friendship with Kim, a Jewish colleague at the hospital, in other than romantic terms. Indeed, she is more ordinary in the film than as described in the book. In fact, Doueiri confided that there’s a scene they ultimately deleted toward the end where Kim shows a clear desire to get close to him physically, only to be rebuffed, with her lashing out at him as a result. Doueiri and I agreed that a romantic subplot with Kim might have undercut the main drama of the story: Amin being left bereft and alone, without his loving wife and without his sense of place in either Israeli or Palestinian society. Sihem, Amin’s wife, is portrayed as Christian in the film, rather than Muslim as in the book. Doueiri explained in a radio interview that he wanted to emphasize that the conflict is national and ethnic rather than religious. A further change is more incidental: Doueiri set scenes in Nablus, written by Khadra as occurring in Bethlehem, simply because he found Nablus more interesting to film than Bethlehem. .

Load more