Standard for Responsible Mineral Processing Draft Version 1.0 June 2021

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Standard for Responsible Mineral Processing Draft Version 1.0 June 2021 Standard for Responsible Mineral Processing Draft version 1.0 June 2021 DRAFT FOR PUBLIC CONSULTATION NOTE TO REVIEWERS This draft Standard for Responsible Mineral Processing has been developed in response to requests from IRMA stakeholders for a comprehensive standard that defines best practices at operations beyond the mine gate. The starting point for the development of this draft was the IRMA Standard for Responsible Mining (referred to as the “Mining Standard”). You will see, however, that terminology has changed, numerous requirements have been adapted, and two new chapters have been developed (Chapter 1.6 on Responsible Sourcing and Chapter 4.9 on Land and Soil Quality). Reviewers are welcome to comment on any aspect of this draft Standard. Throughout the draft Standard, however, you will see NOTES and CONSULTATION QUESTIONS. These appear with a yellow background like the one here. NOTES are informative, to provide readers with a background on the sections mentioned, or drafters’ notes, for example on why particular requirements were removed or combined in this Standard as compared to the Mining Standard. CONSULTATION QUESTIONS are directed at reviewers. These are areas where the drafters are seeking input to help guide and/or improve the wording, help determine the scope or relevancy of proposed requirements, etc. Cross-references to other chapters and Guidance materials will be developed for the final version following the consultation period. When providing comments back to IRMA, it would be appreciated if reviewers could reference specific Chapters, requirement numbers and/or consultation question numbers. Comments may be submitted to IRMA: [email protected] Deadline for Comments: August 16, 2021 1 IRMA MINERAL PROCESSING STANDARD (DRAFT 1.0) – JUNE 2021 www.responsiblemining.net Contents NOTE TO REVIEWERS .......................................................................................................................... 1 Contents ............................................................................................................... 2 Preamble .............................................................................................................. 4 Principle 1: Business Integrity ............................................................................ 10 Chapter 1.1—Legal Compliance ................................................................................................................. 10 Chapter 1.2—Community and Stakeholder Engagement .......................................................................... 14 Chapter 1.3—Human Rights Due Diligence................................................................................................ 20 Chapter 1.4—Complaints and Grievance Mechanism and Access to Remedy .......................................... 27 Chapter 1.5—Financial Transparency and Anti-Corruption ....................................................................... 33 Chapter 1.6—Mineral Supply Chain and Responsible Sourcing NEW ........................................................ 40 Principle 2: Planning and Managing for Positive Legacies .................................. 52 Chapter 2.1—Environmental and Social Impact Assessment and Management ....................................... 52 Chapter 2.2—Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) ............................................................................. 62 Chapter 2.3—Obtaining Community Support and Delivering Benefits ...................................................... 70 Chapter 2.4—Resettlement ....................................................................................................................... 74 Chapter 2.5—Emergency Preparedness and Response ............................................................................. 85 Chapter 2.6—Planning and Financing Decommissioning and Reclamation ............................................... 90 Principle 3: Social Responsibility ........................................................................ 99 Chapter 3.1—Fair Labor and Terms of Work ............................................................................................. 99 Chapter 3.2—Occupational Health and Safety ........................................................................................ 110 Chapter 3.3—Community Health and Safety ........................................................................................... 123 Chapter 3.4—Mineral Processing and Conflict-Affected or High-Risk Areas ........................................... 130 Chapter 3.5—Security Arrangements ...................................................................................................... 139 Chapter 3.6—Artisanal and Small-Scale Mining ....................................................................................... 146 Chapter 3.7—Cultural Heritage ................................................................................................................ 152 Principle 4: Environmental Responsibility ........................................................ 160 Chapter 4.1—Waste and Materials Management ................................................................................... 160 Chapter 4.2—Water Management .......................................................................................................... 173 Chapter 4.3—Air Quality .......................................................................................................................... 192 Chapter 4.4—Noise Management ........................................................................................................... 200 Chapter 4.5—Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Energy Consumption....................................................... 204 Chapter 4.6—Biodiversity, Ecosystem Services and Protected Areas ...................................................... 210 Chapter 4.7—Cyanide Management ........................................................................................................ 222 2 IRMA MINERAL PROCESSING STANDARD (DRAFT 1.0) – JUNE 2021 www.responsiblemining.net Chapter 4.8—Mercury Management ....................................................................................................... 226 Chapter 4.9—Land and Soil Quality NEW ................................................................................................ 232 3 IRMA MINERAL PROCESSING STANDARD (DRAFT 1.0) – JUNE 2021 www.responsiblemining.net Preamble The IRMA Standard for Responsible Mineral Processing Modern societies rely on mined minerals and metals to function. Nearly everything manufactured or constructed – from buildings to roads to computers and trains – contains material that comes from the Earth. The extraction and production of minerals and metals provides important employment and financial opportunities for host communities and host countries. But these complex and intensive processes can also negatively impact the physical environment, such as through the loss of habitat or contamination of water, and local communities’ social and economic situations. IRMA was founded in 2006 by a coalition of nongovernment organizations (NGOs); downstream businesses who purchase minerals and metals for the products they make and sell; trade unions; affected communities; and mining companies. IRMA leaders believe that many of the negative social and environmental impacts can be avoided if mines and facilities that convert raw materials into usable forms of minerals and metals operate according to leading practices. Its vision is: a world where the mining industry is: respectful of the human rights and aspirations of affected communities; provides safe, healthful and respectful workplaces; avoids or minimizes harm to the environment; and leaves positive legacies. IRMA founders set the mission to establish a multi-stakeholder and independently verified responsible mining assurance system that improves social and environmental performance and creates value for leading mine sites. In 2018, IRMA released version 1.0 of its Standard for Responsible Mining (“IRMA Mining Standard”),1 and in 2019 and 2020 the first audits were conducted at mines sites to measure the performance of these sites against the metrics in the IRMA Mining Standard. IRMA stakeholders have expressed that ensuring responsible practices at mine sites is an essential step, but that expectations are being placed on downstream users of metals and minerals to be able to demonstrate that responsible practices are occurring throughout their minerals and metals supply chains. Given that many of the responsible practices at mine sites can and should be applied at other stages in the mineral and metals supply chain, IRMA has drafted a Standard for Responsible Mineral Processing (the “IRMA Mineral Processing Standard”), which specifies performance requirements for environmentally and socially responsible practices during mineral processing. The Standard serves as the basis of a global, voluntary system offering independent third-party review and certification of environmental and social performance measures at smelters, refineries and other operations involved in the processing and extraction of minerals and metals from ores and concentrates. Principles and Objectives The IRMA Standard for Responsible Mineral Processing is designed to support the achievement of four overarching principles. Additionally, each chapter of the IRMA Standard has an objective that meets one or more of these principles.
Recommended publications
  • From Base Metals and Back – Isamills and Their Advantages in African Base Metal Operations
    The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy Base Metals Conference 2013 H. de Waal, K. Barns, and J. Monama From base metals and back – IsaMills and their advantages in African base metal operations H. de Waal, K. Barns, and J. Monama Xstrata IsaMill™ technology was developed from Netzsch Feinmahltechnik GmbH stirred milling technology in the early 1990s to bring about a step change in grinding efficiency that was required to make Xstrata’s fine-grained lead/zinc orebodies economic to process. From small-scale machines suited to ultrafine grinding, the IsaMill™ has developed into technology that is able to treat much larger tonnages, in coarser applications, while still achieving high energy efficiency, suited for coarser more standard regrind and mainstream grinding applications. The unique design of the IsaMillTM, combining high power intensity and effective internal classification, achieves high energy efficiency and tight product distribution which can be effectively scaled from laboratory scale to full-sized models. The use of fine ceramic media also leads to significant benefits in downstream flotation and leaching operations. These benefits are key drivers for the adoption of the technology into processing a diverse range of minerals worldwide, and offer major opportunities for power reduction and improved metallurgy for the African base metal operations. Keywords: IsaMill, regrind, energy efficiency, inert grinding. Introduction The development of the IsaMillTM, by MIM (now GlencoreXstrata) and Netzsch Feinmahltechnik GmbH, was initiated to enable the development of the fine-grained ore deposits at Mt Isa and McArthur River in Northern Australia. To liberate the valuable minerals and so produce a saleable concentrate this ultrafine-grained ore needed to be ground to a P80 of 7 μm.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Processing
    Mineral Processing Foundations of theory and practice of minerallurgy 1st English edition JAN DRZYMALA, C. Eng., Ph.D., D.Sc. Member of the Polish Mineral Processing Society Wroclaw University of Technology 2007 Translation: J. Drzymala, A. Swatek Reviewer: A. Luszczkiewicz Published as supplied by the author ©Copyright by Jan Drzymala, Wroclaw 2007 Computer typesetting: Danuta Szyszka Cover design: Danuta Szyszka Cover photo: Sebastian Bożek Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej Wybrzeze Wyspianskiego 27 50-370 Wroclaw Any part of this publication can be used in any form by any means provided that the usage is acknowledged by the citation: Drzymala, J., Mineral Processing, Foundations of theory and practice of minerallurgy, Oficyna Wydawnicza PWr., 2007, www.ig.pwr.wroc.pl/minproc ISBN 978-83-7493-362-9 Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................................9 Part I Introduction to mineral processing .....................................................................13 1. From the Big Bang to mineral processing................................................................14 1.1. The formation of matter ...................................................................................14 1.2. Elementary particles.........................................................................................16 1.3. Molecules .........................................................................................................18 1.4. Solids................................................................................................................19
    [Show full text]
  • Metal Extraction Processes for Electronic Waste and Existing Industrial Routes: a Review and Australian Perspective
    Resources 2014, 3, 152-179; doi:10.3390/resources3010152 OPEN ACCESS resources ISSN 2079-9276 www.mdpi.com/journal/resources Review Metal Extraction Processes for Electronic Waste and Existing Industrial Routes: A Review and Australian Perspective Abdul Khaliq, Muhammad Akbar Rhamdhani *, Geoffrey Brooks and Syed Masood Faculty of Science, Engineering and Technology, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC 3122, Australia; E-Mails: [email protected] (A.K.); [email protected] (G.B.); [email protected] (S.M.) * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +61-3-9214-8528; Fax: +61-3-9214-8264. Received: 11 December 2013; in revised form: 24 January 2014 / Accepted: 5 February 2014 / Published: 19 February 2014 Abstract: The useful life of electrical and electronic equipment (EEE) has been shortened as a consequence of the advancement in technology and change in consumer patterns. This has resulted in the generation of large quantities of electronic waste (e-waste) that needs to be managed. The handling of e-waste including combustion in incinerators, disposing in landfill or exporting overseas is no longer permitted due to environmental pollution and global legislations. Additionally, the presence of precious metals (PMs) makes e-waste recycling attractive economically. In this paper, current metallurgical processes for the extraction of metals from e-waste, including existing industrial routes, are reviewed. In the first part of this paper, the definition, composition and classifications of e-wastes are described. In the second part, separation of metals from e-waste using mechanical processing, hydrometallurgical and pyrometallurgical routes are critically analyzed.
    [Show full text]
  • Principles of Extractive Metallurgy Lectures Note
    PRINCIPLES OF EXTRACTIVE METALLURGY B.TECH, 3RD SEMESTER LECTURES NOTE BY SAGAR NAYAK DR. KALI CHARAN SABAT DEPARTMENT OF METALLURGICAL AND MATERIALS ENGINEERING PARALA MAHARAJA ENGINEERING COLLEGE, BERHAMPUR DISCLAIMER This document does not claim any originality and cannot be used as a substitute for prescribed textbooks. The information presented here is merely a collection by the author for their respective teaching assignments as an additional tool for the teaching-learning process. Various sources as mentioned at the reference of the document as well as freely available material from internet were consulted for preparing this document. The ownership of the information lies with the respective author or institutions. Further, this document is not intended to be used for commercial purpose and the faculty is not accountable for any issues, legal or otherwise, arising out of use of this document. The committee faculty members make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this document and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. BPUT SYLLABUS PRINCIPLES OF EXTRACTIVE METALLURGY (3-1-0) MODULE I (14 HOURS) Unit processes in Pyro metallurgy: Calcination and roasting, sintering, smelting, converting, reduction, smelting-reduction, Metallothermic and hydrogen reduction; distillation and other physical and chemical refining methods: Fire refining, Zone refining, Liquation and Cupellation. Small problems related to pyro metallurgy. MODULE II (14 HOURS) Unit processes in Hydrometallurgy: Leaching practice: In situ leaching, Dump and heap leaching, Percolation leaching, Agitation leaching, Purification of leach liquor, Kinetics of Leaching; Bio- leaching: Recovery of metals from Leach liquor by Solvent Extraction, Ion exchange , Precipitation and Cementation process.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Tailings1
    A HISTORY OF MINERAL CONCENTRATION: A HISTORY OF TAILINGS1 by Timothy c. Richmond2 Abstract: The extraction of mineral values from the earth for beneficial use has been a human activity- since long before recorded history. Methodologies were little changed until the late 19th century. The nearly simultaneous developments of a method to produce steel of a uniform carbon content and the means to generate electrical power gave man the ability to process huge volumes of ores of ever decreasing purity. The tailings or waste products of mineral processing were traditionally discharged into adjacent streams, lakes, the sea or in piles on dry land. Their confinement apparently began in the early 20th century as a means for possible future mineral recovery, for the recycling of water in arid regions and/or in response to growing concerns for water pollution control. Additional Key Words: Mineral Beneficiation " ... for since Nature usually creates metals in an impure state, mixed with earth, stones, and solidified juices, it is necessary to separate most of these impurities from the ores as far as can be, and therefore I will now describe the methods by which the ores are sorted, broken with hammers, burnt, crushed with stamps, ground into powder, sifted, washed ..•. " Agricola, 1550 Introduction identifying mining wastes. It is frequently used mistakenly The term "tailings" is to identify all mineral wastes often misapplied when including the piles of waste rock located at the mouth of 1Presented at the 1.991. National mine shafts and adi ts, over- American. Society for Surface burden materials removed in Mining and Reclamation Meeting surface mining, wastes from in Durango, co, May 1.4-17, 1.991 concentrating activities and sometimes the wastes from 2Timothy c.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Flux Materials on the Fire Assay of Oxide Gold Ores
    Effects of Flux Materials on the Fire Assay of Oxide Gold Ores Haluk Ozden Basaran1, Ahmet Turan1,2*, Onuralp Yucel1 1Istanbul Technical University; Chemical Metallurgical Faculty, Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering; Maslak, Istanbul, 34469, Turkey 2Yalova University, Yalova Community College, 77100, Yalova, Turkey Abstract: Fire assay is the most accurate and widely used method for the determination of gold, silver and the PGM contents of ores and other solid materials. The technique has three steps; first step is the smelting of charge mixtures which consist of ground ore samples, acidic and basic fluxes, lead oxide and a carbon source. Isolation of precious metals which are collected in metallic lead phase as a result of the reduction of PbO is the second step and it is called cupellation. Obtained precious metals are analyzed by using wet analysis methods such as AAS (Atomic absorption spectrometry) and ICP (Inductively coupled plasma spectrometry) at the last stage. The aim of this study is the investigation of the effects of the acidic flux materials for the fire assay of oxide gold ores. Acidic fluxes, sodium borax decahydrate (Borax, Na2B4O7·10H2O) and quartz (SiO2), were individually and together added to the charge mixtures which contain oxide gold ore samples, sodium carbonate (Na2CO3) and lead oxide with flour as a carbon source. Acidic flux additions were performed in different amounts. Smelting stage of the experiments was conducted at 1100 °C in fire clay crucibles for a reaction time of 60 minutes by using a chamber furnace. After the cupellation step in the chamber furnace, gold containing beads were obtained.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Beneficiation Contents
    Lecture 10: Mineral Beneficiation Contents: Preamble What constitutes mineral beneficiation Size reduction technology Concentration technologies: Basics Recovery and grade Separation efficiency Illustration on separation efficiency Concentration methods Conclusions References Keywords: mineral beneficiation, Milling, gravity concentration flotation Preamble Mineral beneficiation is the first step in extraction of metal from natural resources. With the depletion of high grade metal ores it is important to increase the metal grade of an ore by physical methods; which are termed mineral beneficiation .The objectives of mineral beneficiation are • To increase the metal grade of ore • To reduce the amount of gangue minerals so that lower volume of slag forms in pyromettallurgical extraction of metals .Slag contains mostly gangue minerals. • To decrease the thermal energy required to separate liquid metal from gangue minerals. • To decrease the aqueous solution requirement in hydrometturgical extraction of metals. In this lecture, mineral beneficiation science and technology are briefly reviewed so that readers can apply materials balance principles. Details about the mineral beneficiation can be studied in the reference given in this lecture. What constitutes mineral beneficiation? Ore is an aggregate of minerals and contains valuable and gangue minerals .The mineral beneficiation involves separations of gangue minerals from ore and is done in the following two stages: 1. Liberation of valuable mineral by size reduction technologies. In most ores the valuable minerals is distributed in the matrix of ore. 2. Concentration technologies to separate the gangue minerals and to achieve increase in the content of the valuable mineral to increase the metal grade. Sizes reduction technologies Size reduction or communication is an important step and may be used 9 To produce particles of required sizes and shapes 9 To liberate valuable mineral so that it can be concentrated.
    [Show full text]
  • Isamill™ Technology Used in Efficient Grinding Circuits
    1 IsaMill™ Technology Used in Efficient Grinding Circuits B.D. Burford1 and L.W. Clark2 High intensity stirred milling is now an industry accepted method to efficiently grind fine and coarse particles. In particular, the IsaMill™, which was invented for, and transformed the fine grinding industry, is now being included in many new comminution circuits in coarser applications. While comminution has always been regarded as important from a processing perspective, the pressure being applied by environmental concerns on all large scale power users, now make highly energy efficient processes more important than ever. The advantages that were developed in fine grinding in the early IsaMill™ installations have been carried over into coarse grinding applications. These advantages include a simple grinding circuit that operates in open circuit with a small footprint, the ability to offer sharp product size classification, as well as the use of inert media in a high energy intensive environment. This paper will examine the use of IsaMill™ technology in fine grinding (P80 below 15 micron), and examine the use of the technology in conventional grinding applications (P80 20 - 150 µm). Recent installations will be examined, including fine and coarse grinding applications, as well as the recent test work that was undertaken using an IsaMill™ in a primary grinding circuit, and the resulting circuit proposal for this site. While comminution has been relatively unchanged for the last century, the need to install energy efficient technology will promote further growth in IsaMill™ installations, and result in one of the biggest challenges to traditional comminution design. 1. Senior Process Engineer, Xstrata Technology, L4, 307 Queen Street, Brisbane 4000, Qld, Australia 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Damage Cases and Environmental Releases from Mines and Mineral Processing Sites
    DAMAGE CASES AND ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES FROM MINES AND MINERAL PROCESSING SITES 1997 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Solid Waste 401 M Street, SW Washington, DC 20460 Contents Table of Contents INTRODUCTION Discussion and Summary of Environmental Releases and Damages ......................... Page 1 Methodology for Developing Environmental Release Cases ............................... Page 19 ARIZONA ASARCO Silver Bell Mine: "Waste and Process Water Discharges Contaminate Three Washes and Ground Water" ................................................... Page 24 Cyprus Bagdad Mine: "Acidic, Copper-Bearing Solution Seeps to Boulder Creek" ................................ Page 27 Cyprus Twin Buttes Mine: "Tank Leaks Acidic Metal Solution Resulting in Possible Soil and Ground Water Contamination" ...................................... Page 29 Magma Copper Mine: "Broken Pipeline Seam Causes Discharge to Pinal Creek" ................................ Page 31 Magma Copper Mine: "Multiple Discharges of Polluted Effluents Released to Pinto Creek and Its Tributaries" .................................................... Page 33 Magma Copper Mine: "Multiple Overflows Result in Major Fish Kill in Pinto Creek" ............................... Page 36 Magma Copper Mine: "Repeated Release of Tailings to Pinto Creek" .......................................... Page 39 Phelps Dodge Morenci Mine: "Contaminated Storm Water Seeps to Ground Water and Surface Water" ................................................................ Page 43 Phelps Dodge
    [Show full text]
  • Identification and Description of Mineral Processing Sectors And
    V. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS As shown in Exhibit 5-1, EPA determined that 48 commodity sectors generated a total of 527 waste streams that could be classified as either extraction/beneficiation or mineral processing wastes. After careful review, EPA determined that 41 com modity sectors generated a total of 354 waste streams that could be designated as mineral processing wastes. Exhibit 5-2 presents the 354 mineral processing wastes by commodity sector. Of these 354 waste streams, EPA has sufficient information (based on either analytical test data or engineering judgment) to determine that 148 waste streams are potentially RCRA hazardous wastes because they may exhibit one or more of the RCRA hazardous characteristics: toxicity, ignitability, corro sivity, or reactivity. Exhibit 5-3 presents the 148 RCRA hazardous mineral processing wastes that will be subject to the Land Disposal Restrictions. Exhibit 5-4 identifies the mineral processing commodity sectors that generate RCRA hazardous mineral processing wastes that are likely to be subject to the Land D isposal Restrictions. Exhibit 5-4 also summarizes the total number of hazardous waste streams by sector and the estimated total volume of hazardous wastes generated annually. At this time, however, EPA has insufficient information to determine whether the following nine sectors also generate wastes that could be classified as mineral processing wastes: Bromine, Gemstones, Iodine, Lithium, Lithium Carbonate, Soda Ash, Sodium Sulfate, and Strontium.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Energy Efficiency Across Mineral Processing and Smelting Operations – a New Approach
    Improving Energy Efficiency Across Mineral Processing and Smelting Operations – A New Approach C L Evans1, B L Coulter2, E Wightman3 and A S Burrows4 ABSTRACT now reporting their performance in this area using a range of sustainability indicators. Among these, energy use and its impact With their commitment to sustainable development in an increasingly carbon-constrained world, many resources companies are focused on on climate change are priorities, with many company reducing the energy required to create their final products. In particular, sustainability reports including total energy use and associated the comminution and smelting of metal-bearing ores are both highly greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in both absolute and relative energy-intensive processes. If resource companies can optimise the terms (ie normalised to a per unit product) among their key energy efficiency across these two processing stages, they can directly environmental sustainability indicators. Companies are setting reduce their overall energy consumption per unit mass of metal produced targets to achieve improvements in these indicators, but at the and thus reduce their greenhouse gas footprint. same time there is a global trend to more complex and lower Traditional grinding and flotation models seek to improve the grade orebodies which are more energy-intensive to process. As efficiency of mineral processing, but they do not consider the energy used a result, resource companies are having to become more by downstream metal production, eg smelting and refining. Concentrators innovative to improve the environmental sustainability and the and smelters individually may be running efficiently, but are they optimising energy consumption of the overall system? A key step towards efficiency of their operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Gravity Concentration in Artisanal Gold Mining
    minerals Review Gravity Concentration in Artisanal Gold Mining Marcello M. Veiga * and Aaron J. Gunson Norman B. Keevil Institute of Mining Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 21 September 2020; Accepted: 13 November 2020; Published: 18 November 2020 Abstract: Worldwide there are over 43 million artisanal miners in virtually all developing countries extracting at least 30 different minerals. Gold, due to its increasing value, is the main mineral extracted by at least half of these miners. The large majority use amalgamation either as the final process to extract gold from gravity concentrates or from the whole ore. This latter method has been causing large losses of mercury to the environment and the most relevant world’s mercury pollution. For years, international agencies and researchers have been promoting gravity concentration methods as a way to eventually avoid the use of mercury or to reduce the mass of material to be amalgamated. This article reviews typical gravity concentration methods used by artisanal miners in developing countries, based on numerous field trips of the authors to more than 35 countries where artisanal gold mining is common. Keywords: artisanal mining; gold; gravity concentration 1. Introduction Worldwide, there are more than 43 million micro, small, medium, and large artisanal miners extracting at least 30 different minerals in rural regions of developing countries (IGF, 2017) [1]. Approximately 20 million people in more than 70 countries are directly involved in artisanal gold mining (AGM), with an estimated gold production between 380 and 450 tonnes per annum (tpa) (Seccatore et al., 2014 [2], Thomas et al., 2019 [3], Stocklin-Weinberg et al., 2019 [4], UNEP, 2020 [5]).
    [Show full text]