ISSN: 1402-1544 ISBN 978-91-7439-XXX-X Se i listan och fyll i siffror där kryssen är
DOCTORAL T H E SI S Fredrik Engström Mineralogical Influence on Leaching Behaviour of Steelmaking Slags Steelmaking Behaviourof Leaching on Influence Mineralogical Engström Fredrik
Department of Chemical Engineering and Geoscience Division of Minerals and Metallurgical Engineering Mineralogical Influence on Leaching ISSN: 1402-1544 ISBN 978-91-7439-197-8
Luleå University of Technology 2010 Behaviour of Steelmaking Slags A Laboratory Investigation
Fredrik Engström A Laboratory Investigation Laboratory A
Mineralogical influence on leaching behaviour of steelmaking slags
A Laboratory Investigation
by
Fredrik Engström
Doctoral Thesis
Luleå University of Technology Department of Chemical Engineering and Geoscience Division of Minerals and Metallurgical Engineering SE-97187 Luleå Sweden
2010
Printed by Universitetstryckeriet, Luleå 2010
ISSN: 1402-1544 ISBN 978-91-7439-197-8 Luleå 2010 www.ltu.se LIST OF PAPERS
This thesis is based on the following papers:
I. Dirk Durinck, Fredrik Engström, Sander Arnout, Jeroen Heulens, Peter Tom Jones, Bo Björkman, Bart Blanpain and Patrick Wollants: Hot stage processing of metallurgical slags. Resources, Conservation and Recycling (2008), Vol 52, No 10, p 1121-1131.
II. Mia Tossavainen, Fredrik Engström, Qixing Yang, Nourreddine Menad, Margareta Lidström Larsson and Bo Björkman: Characteristics of steel slag under different cooling conditions. Waste Management (2007), Vol 27, No 10, p 1335-1344.
III. Fredrik Engström, Daniel Adolfsson, Qixing Yang, Caisa Samuelsson and Bo Björkman: Crystallization behaviour of some steelmaking slags. Steel Research International (2010), Vol 81, No 5, p 362-371.
IV. Fredrik Engström, Margareta Lidström Larsson, Caisa Samuelsson, Åke Sandström, Ryan Robinson and Bo Björkman: Leaching behaviour of aged steel slags. Submitted (Resources, Conservation and Recycling) 2010.
V. Fredrik Engström, Daniel Adolfsson, Caisa Samuelsson, Åke Sandström and Bo Björkman: A study of the solubility of pure slag minerals. Submitted (Minerals Engineering) 2010.
I VI. Sina Mostaghel, Fredrik Engström, Caisa Samuelsson and Bo Björkman: Stability of spinels in a high basicity EAF slag. Proceedings of 6th European Slag Conference, October 20-22, 2010, Madrid, Spain.
F. Engström’s contribution to the papers:
• Practical experiments.
• Responsible for characterization of materials obtained during experimental work using XRD, SEM and leaching.
• Interpretation of leaching data and correlation to mineralogical phases.
• Thermodynamic calculations.
• Responsible for writing Papers II-V and parts of Paper I.
• Supervising and contributing to the discussion of Paper VI.
II Related publications not included in this thesis:
VII. Mia Tossavainen, Fredrik Engström, Nourreddine Menad and Qixing Yang: Stability of modified steel slags. Proceedings of 4th European Slag Conference, June 20-21, 2005, Oulu, Finland.
VIII. Qixing Yang, Fredrik Engström, Mia Tossavainen and Daniel Adolfsson: Treatments of AOD slag to enhance recycling and resource conservation. Proceeding of Securing the Future, International Conference on Mining and the Environment, Metals and Energy Recovery, June 27-July 1, 2005, Skellefteå, Sweden.
IX. Qixing Yang, Fredrik Engström, Mia Tossavainen and Mingzhao He: AOD slag treatment to recover metal and to prevent slag dusting. Proceeding of the 7th Nordic-Japan Symposium on Science and Technology of Process Metallurgy, Jernkontoret, September 15-16, 2005, Stockholm, Sweden.
X. Qixing Yang, Lotta Nedar, Fredrik Engström and Mingzhao He: Treatments of AOD slag to produce aggregates for road construction. Proceeding of AISTech 2006, May 1-4, 2006, Cleveland, USA, Vol. 1, p 573-583.
XI. Qixing Yang, Björn Haase, Fredrik Engström and Anita Wedholm: Stabilization of EAF slag for use as construction material. Proceedings of REWAS 2008, Global Symposium on Recycling,
III Waste Treatment. Minerals, Metals & Materials Society, October 12- 15, 2008, Cancun, Mexico, p 49-54.
XII. Fredrik Engström, Margareta Lidström Larsson, Caisa Samuelsson and Bo Björkman: Ageing investigation of steel slags from electric arc furnace processes. Proceedings of REWAS 2008, Global Symposium on Recycling, Waste Treatment. Minerals, Metals & Materials Society, October 12-15, 2008, Cancun, Mexico, p 353- 358.
XIII. Qixing Yang, Fredrik Engström, Bo Björkman and Daniel Adolfsson: Modification study of a steel slag to prevent the slag disintegration after metal recovery and to enhance slag utilization. Proceedings of the VIII international conference on molten slags, fluxes and salts, January 18-21, 2009, Santiago, Chile, p 33-41.
XIV. Fredrik Engström, Caisa Samuelsson and Bo Björkman: Mineralogical influence of different cooling conditions on leaching behaviour of steelmaking slags. Proceedings of the 1st International Slag Valorisation Symposium, 6-7 April, 2009, Leuven, Belgium, p 67-80.
XV. Charlotte Andersson, Bo Björkman, Fredrik Engström, Sina Mostaghel and Caisa Samuelsson: The need for fundamental measurements for a sustainable extraction of metals. Seetharaman – Seminar 2010.
IV XVI. Daniel Adolfsson, Fredrik Engström, Ryan Robinson and Bo Björkman: Cementitious phases in ladle slag. Accepted for publication in Steel Research International, November 2010.
XVII. Daniel Adolfsson, Fredrik Engström, Ryan Robinson and Bo Björkman: Hydraulic properties of ladle slag. Submitted to Cement and Concrete Research, September 2010.
XVIII. Daniel Adolfsson, Ryan Robinson, Fredrik Engström and Bo Björkman: Hydraulic properties of mayenite. Submitted to Cement and Concrete Research, September 2010.
XIX. Chandra Sekhar Gahan, Jan-Eric Sundkvist, Fredrik Engström and Åke Sandström: Utilization of steel slags as neutralizing agents in biooxidation of a refractory gold concentrate and their influence on the subsequent cyanidation. Submitted to Resources, Conservation and Recycling, September 2010.
XX. Chandra Sekhar Gahan, Jan-Eric Sundkvist, Fredrik Engström and Åke Sandström: Comparative assessment of Industrial oxidic by- products as neutralising agents in biooxidation and their influence on gold recovery in subsequent cyanidation. Proceedings of the 11th International Seminar on Mineral Processing Technology MPT- 2010, December 15-17, 2010, Jamshedpur, India.
V VI ABSTRACT The Swedish steelmaking industry produces large amounts of by-products. In 2008, the total amount of slag produced reached approximately 1,300,000 metric tons, of which 20% was deposited. Due to its strength, durability and chemistry, steel slag is of interest in the field of construction, since it has similar or better qualities than ordinary ballast stone, which makes it a competitive construction material. However, some steel slags face an array of quality concerns that might hinder their use. These concerns generally involve the following physical and chemical properties:
• Volume expansion • Disintegration • Leaching of metals
By controlling and modifying process parameters during slag handling in liquid state, the physical and chemical properties of steel slags can be adequately modified to obtain a high-quality product for external application. The present work was undertaken as a research project within the Minerals and Metals Recycling Research Centre, MiMeR. The major goal of this work has been to investigate how different treatment methods including hot stage processing, cooling rates, ageing time and chemical composition influence the final properties of the slag. Analysis techniques used in this investigation include: thermodynamic calculations using FactsageTM, X-ray diffraction analyses (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), leaching tests (EN12457-2/3) and thermo-gravimetric analyses (TG).
VII The results from this study show that it is possible to control/change the properties of the final product by additions to the liquid slag, thereby changing the chemical composition, as well as by varying the rate and method of cooling. The mineralogical composition, the size of the crystals and the composition of some solid solutions are affected by the cooling rate. The solubility of elements such as chromium and molybdenum varies, probably due to their presence in different minerals. The reactivity of the investigated slag samples increases as the cooling rate increases.
When steel slags are aged, the leaching properties of the materials are changed. The total leachability and the pH decrease for all the investigated samples. All elements except magnesium decrease in leachability. As the slags are aged CaCO3 is formed on the slag surfaces. The degree of carbonation differs between different slags, due to the presence of different calcium-rich minerals in the slag. In order to form
CaCO3, the calcium-containing mineral must be dissolved. This means that the solubility of the calcium-containing mineral will affect the outcome of the carbonation. The rate of dissolution for six typical slag minerals was investigated in order to distinguish the difference in solubility between the different minerals. Acidic to alkaline pHs (4, 7 and 10) were selected to investigate the solubility of the minerals under conditions comparable to those prevailing in newly produced slags and the potential future pH values obtained under acid conditions. It can be concluded that all six minerals behave differently when dissolving and that the rate of dissolution is generally slower at higher pH. At pH 10, the solubility of merwinite, akermanite and gehlenite is considered slow. The dissolution of -Ca2SiO4 is not affected in the same way as the other minerals when the pH is changed.
VIII ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I wish to thank my thesis advisors, Professor Bo Björkman, Associate Professor Caisa Samuelsson and Dr Qixing Yang for all your help and guidance during the course of my work. Dr Margareta Lidström Larsson, för att jag fick lära känna dig samt för den korta men lärorika tiden vi fick tillsammans inom området slagg, du är saknad.
I would also like to thank my colleagues and friends for putting up with me all these years. Danny P, Ryro, Ulla, Anaitich, Raggsockan, Challe and Secharo, you have all ‘now left the building’, so to speak. Åke B, Sempan, Biggish, Anders, Samuel, LILLKORVEN, U-tuff och sist men inte minst Muchtagellerna; without you, this work would have been considerably more difficult. Thanks also to Associate Professor Nourreddine Menad, now working at BRGM in France, for all the fruitful and entertaining discussions. To member companies in MiMeR, Jernkontoret – The Swedish Steel Producers Association (TO55 – Steel production residues), VINNOVA – The Swedish Governmental Agency for Innovation Systems, Mistra – The foundation for Strategic Environmental Research and CAMM – Centre for Advanced Mining & Metallurgy, I extend my sincere thanks for invaluable financial support and commitment. Without your help, this study would never have been possible.
Finally, I wish to thank my family. Linda, thanks for all your help and wonderful support. Thank you Moa and Emil, you mean everything to me. Johan, Mum and Dad, Thank you for helping to make me the person I am.
Fredrik Engström, December 2010, Luleå, Sweden
IX
X CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION ...... 1
1.1 BACKGROUND...... 1 1.2 STEELMAKING SLAGS ...... 9 1.3 UTILIZATION OF STEELMAKING SLAGS ...... 12 1.4 CRYSTALLIZATION THEORY ...... 15 1.5 AIM AND SCOPE ...... 19 2 MATERIALS AND EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE ...... 21
2.1 MATERIAL ...... 21 2.2 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE ...... 21 3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ...... 27
3.1 LITERATURE REVIEW - HOT STAGE MODIFICATION, PAPER I ...... 27 3.2 A MINERALOGICAL INTERPRETATION OF THE SOLIDIFICATION /SOLUBILITY OF STEEL SLAGS. PAPERS II & III ...... 28 3.3 AGEING INVESTIGATION OF EAF SLAGS, PAPER IV ...... 43 3.4 A STUDY OF THE SOLUBILITY OF PURE SLAG MINERALS, PAPER V ...... 49 3.5 STABILITY OF SPINELS IN HIGH-BASICITY EAF SLAG, PAPER VI...... 51 4 CONCLUDING DISCUSSION ...... 55 5 CONCLUSIONS ...... 63 6 FUTURE WORK ...... 65 7 REFERENCES ...... 67
XI
XII 1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND
Large amounts of by-products are produced by the Swedish steelmaking industry each year. In 2008, the total amount of slag produced reached approximately 1.3 million tonnes, corresponding to almost 0.3% of the total steel slag production worldwide the same year [1,2]. 35%, mostly blast furnace slag, was sold as external products and approximately 20% was used for landfilling. The remaining 45% was used internally at the steel plants. The landfilled amount is high in comparison to Europe overall. In 2006, only 7% of the slags produced was dumped, while approximately 80% was used in external applications [1]. There are several reasons for the low utilization of steel slags in Sweden compared to other European countries: high availability of good stone material, high availability of land for landfilling, and a high share of scrap-based and high-alloy steelmaking. In Sweden, a number of goals have been formulated in order to obtain a so-called good building environment, promoting sustainable management of land, water and other resources [3]. Among these criteria are:
• By 2010, extraction of natural gravel in the country will not exceed 12 million tonnes per year. • The total quantity of waste generated will not increase and maximum use will be made of its resource potential while minimizing health and environmental effects and associated risks.
To date, these criteria “goals” have not been reached. Due to its strength, durability and chemistry, steel slag could be considered in the field of construction, since the material provides similar and sometimes even better
1 properties than granite and flint gravel [4]. Using slag in construction would contribute to a reduction in the amount of landfilled material and, at the same time, preserve natural resources, fulfilling the environmental goal. However, the possibility of using slag is limited due to the lack of rules and guidelines regarding testing, assessment and use of slag in Sweden. The technical and environmental obstacles for not using some slags in construction include:
• Volumetric expansion • Disintegration • Leaching of metals
According to Monaco and Lu [5], the volumetric expansion is considered to be associated with the presence of free lime (CaO) and free periclase (MgO) in the solidified slag. Free lime and periclase react with moisture, resulting in an expansion due to the formation of Mg(OH)2 and Ca(OH)2 [6]. The understanding of these phenomena has led to the development of several treatment techniques, including steam and water treatment, in order to enhance the hydration [7].
It is well established that, upon cooling, pure dicalcium silicate undergoes several phase transformations from the high-temperature -Ca2SiO4 to the low-temperature -Ca2SiO4 polymorph, Figure 1. As the athermal, martensitic-like transformation of the monoclinic -polymorph to the orthorhombic -polymorph is accompanied by a volume expansion of about 12%, high internal stresses are built up in the slag during this transformation, finally causing the disintegration of the slag [8,9].
2
Figure 1: Phase transformation of pure Ca2SiO4 [10].
The polymorphic transformation of to -Ca2SiO4 is known to occur in some EAF (Electric Arc Furnace) and AOD slags (Argon Oxygen Decarburization) from stainless steel production depending on composition and the cooling rate [11]. In addition to dust problems at the slag yard, the usage of the disintegrating slag in external applications is limited due to the high amount of fines. One route to preventing slag disintegration is to inhibit the - to -transformation of Ca2SiO4 or completely avoid the presence of
Ca2SiO4. The first option was elaborated in 1986 by the development of a borate-based stabiliser for stainless steel slags [12]. Seki and co-workers [12] corroborated that by adding borates to a high-temperature slag,
Ca2SiO4 grains in the slag could be stabilized. The addition of only 0.2 wt%
3 of B2O3 was sufficient to prevent the disintegration of a slag with 51 wt%
CaO, 33 wt% SiO2 and 11 wt% MgO. Phosphorus also exhibits a stabilizing effect of Ca2SiO4. Experiments conducted in laboratory scale have shown promising results; however, larger amounts are required compared to borate additions [13]. Instead of using chemical additions, the - to - transformation of Ca2SiO4 can also be avoided by rapid cooling [14]. According to the laboratory experiments, the required slag cooling rate is about 5°C/s [15,16]. This stabilization method was further developed by showing, in laboratory scale, that a granulation process transforms a disintegrating slag into a slag product suitable for construction applications [17]. The second option to avert slag disintegration is by avoiding the presence of Ca2SiO4 by modifying the slag composition. Adding a relatively large amount of a SiO2 source seems to be the best way to avoid Ca2SiO4 precipitation. In laboratory experiments, AOD slag was stabilized with 12 wt% of waste glass, containing 70–75 wt% of SiO2 [18]. The cost of such an operation would be far lower than that of the borate additions. However, the limited heat content and heat conductivity of slags make it difficult to apply this method of dissolving large amounts of SiO2 in an industrial environment.
Apart from volume stability and disintegration, leaching of potentially hazardous compounds during reuse is another key issue in slag valorisation. The leaching from steel slags is generally characterized as a surface reaction, followed by a solid-solid diffusion process, in order to retain equilibrium in the materials [19]. It is therefore reasonable to believe that the rate of leaching decreases with time as the diffusion from the bulk of the solid slag to the surface is slow. Minimization of the surface area and/or formation of a less reactive surface layer on the slag can therefore
4 be assumed to decrease the leachability. One way of introducing such a layer is by letting the slag react with CO2 (g), forming calcium carbonates,
CaCO3. Research has shown that carbonation of alkaline solid material can lead to an improvement of their environmental qualities [20,21]. The mechanism behind this formation depends on several factors such as temperature, particle size, porosity and CO2 diffusivity [22-24]. According to Huijgen et al. [22], the diffusion of calcium through the solid slag matrix, towards the surface, appears to be the rate-determining step in carbonation, implying that the solubility of all calcium-containing mineral in the slag will affect the outcome of the carbonation of the slag surface. However, when it comes to leaching, the exact mechanisms still remain unclear. Therefore, a lot of effort is being put into a mineralogical interpretation of the leaching. High resolution techniques such as XANES (X-ray absorption near-edge structure) and WDS (wavelength dispersive spectroscopy) together with simulations of the leaching behaviour are today used in order to characterize the slag in detail, in order to identify all possible sources of release. The possibility to simulate the leaching behaviour from aged steel slags, using geochemical modelling has been investigated [25,26]. These types of simulations sometimes fail to fully describe these complex systems, mostly because available data (solubility/thermodynamic/sorption) for the minerals occurring in the slag systems often are incomplete or missing.
Chromium is the metal in the slag that is given the most attention when it comes to leaching. Several types of slag contain a significant fraction of oxidized chromium [27]. This is especially the case for ferrochromium and stainless steel slags. Nevertheless, chromium oxides are also encountered in regular steel slags and several types of non-ferrous slags. When these
5 slags are recycled, chromium comes in contact with the environment. Although Cr3+ is an essential nutrient for mammals, elevated levels are hazardous and may cause, for example, skin rashes. Cr6+ is carcinogenic; hence, its presence in ground water should be prevented [28,29].
One way to decrease Cr release from the slag is by incorporating the chromium into stable mineral phases during cooling of the slag. The leaching levels are believed to be limited substantially when chromium is contained in a spinel phase—AB2O4, with A being a bivalent cation and B a trivalent cation [30]. Based on this, Kühn and Mudersbach [31] related chromium leaching to the concentration of spinel-forming compounds in the slag. They performed a large number of extraction tests on industrial stainless steel electric arc furnace slags and derived an empirical formula, factor sp, to relate the overall slag composition to the chromium leaching:
Factor sp = 0.2MgO + 1.0Al2O3 +nFeOx 0.5Cr2O3
‘n’ is a number between 1 and 4, depending on the oxidation state of the slag. When factor sp is below 5, a high chromium leaching is observed. When factor sp is above 5, chromium leaching is low. In addition to enrichment of chromium in spinel phases, microprobe measurements performed on synthetic manufactured steel slags have shown that chromium can be enriched in numerous phases, e.g. bredigite
(Ca7MgSi4O16), merwinite (Ca3MgSi2O8) and wollastonite (CaSiO3) [32]. As in the case of carbonation, this means that the solubility of the different chromium-containing slag minerals must be known before the leaching of metals, e.g. chromium, can be explained.
6 Apart from what already has been discussed, very little is reported in the literature regarding the influence of cooling on the properties of slag, especially for steelmaking slags. As the solidification behaviour is highly dependent on the exact composition, results are not easily transferable to other slags. Ground granulated blast furnace slags (GGBS) are known to possess improved hydration reactivity compared to slowly cooled blast furnace slag, due to the formation of glass [33]. The formation of a glassy material depends on both the chemical composition and the cooling conditions. According to Daugherty et al. [34], glass was easier to produce, as the acidity of the slag increased for a series of synthetic slag compositions that was quenched and annealed. Ionescu et al. [35], [36] have shown how water quenching of steel slag results in products with a high content of glassy material. Silicate melts have high viscosity due to long molecule chains, and rearrangement into crystals only takes place slowly. If the cooling is rapid, the slag passes from a liquid state to a solid without development of a crystalline structure [37]. Glasses, such as granulated slags, can be regarded as super-cooled liquids having a very high viscosity.
Besides glass formation, controlling cooling conditions can be a means of affecting mineral transformation and, consequently, the solubility of 6+ elements like chromium. According to Lee and Nassarella [38], Cr is usually formed at lower temperatures. They suggest that by cooling the slag rapidly, the formation of Cr6+ will be limited due to the slower kinetics. Monaco and Lu [39] have reported variations in the composition of the wustite-type solid solution as well as a variation in crystal size when cooling differently. Despite extensive research efforts on these topics, a number of
7 questions remain. The leaching behaviour is still the primary cause for difficulties with valorisation.
8 1.2 STEELMAKING SLAGS Slag is formed through a chemical reaction of a flux and the gangue of an ore, the ash from a fuel, or with the impurities oxidized during the production and refining of a metal. In most iron- and steelmaking processes, the slag is in intimate contact with the liquid metal and chemical reactions readily occur between the slag and the metal. The main purpose of slag in processes such as basic oxygen furnace (BOF) and electric arc furnace (EAF) is to extract unwanted elements from the steel bath, help preventing metal oxidation and limit the heat losses from the steel [40].
1.2.1 BOF slag BOF slag is produced as a by-product when iron is converted into steel in the BOF converter through the injection of oxygen. The slag is produced by the addition of fluxes, such as limestone and dolomite, during the process. Unwanted elements such as carbon, silicon and phosphor are either oxidized to gases or chemically bonded into the slag. The most common minerals found in the BOF slag are listed in Table 1. All minerals may not necessarily be present in all slags of a given type.
Table 1: Most abundant minerals usually found in BOF slag.
Mineral name Structural formula
Larnite -Ca2SiO4
Srebrodolskite Ca2Fe2O5
Tricalcium silicate Ca3SiO5 2+ 3+ Spinel (Fe,Mg,Mn,Al) Me Me 2O4 Wustite FeO Lime CaO Periclase MgO
9 1.2.2 EAF slag EAF slag is produced as a by-product during the melting of scrap, when processed in the electric arc furnace at temperatures above 1600°C. Phosphorus, sulphur, silicon and sometimes carbon are removed by lancing oxygen into the melt, forming a liquid oxide slag. In Sweden, two types of EAF slag are produced; carbon and high-alloyed steel. EAF slag which originates from the carbon steel manufacturing usually has a high content of iron and basicity B2 (CaO/SiO2) around 2.5, while the EAF slag generated from the production of high-alloyed steel might differ considerably. The most common minerals found in the two EAF slags are listed in Table 2.
Table 2: Most abundant minerals usually found in EAF slags. Electric arc furnace slag (carbon steel)
Mineral name Structural formula
Larnite -Ca2SiO4
Srebrodolskite Ca2Fe2O5
Brownmillerite Ca2(Al,Fe)O5 2+ 3+ Spinel (Fe,Mg,Mn,Al,Cr) Me Me 2O4 Wustite FeO Periclase MgO
Electric arc furnace slag (high alloy steel)
Mineral name Structural formula
Bredegite Ca14Mg2(SiO4)8
Merwinite Ca3MgSi2O8
Akermanite Ca2MgSi2O7
Gehlenite Ca2Al2SiO7
Cuspidine Ca4F2Si2O7 Periclase MgO 2+ 3+ Spinel (Fe,Mg,Mn,Al,Cr) Me Me 2O4
10 1.2.3 AOD slag In the manufacture of high-alloyed stainless steel the AOD (Argon Oxygen Decarburization) converter is often the first refining step after the electric arc furnace. By decreasing the oxygen content in the decarburization gas gradually, using inert gas (nitrogen and/or argon), a significant removal of carbon is achieved without extensive losses of chromium to the slag. The AOD slag often shows disintegrating properties due to the formation of -
Ca2SiO4. The most likely minerals to be found in the AOD slag are listed in Table 3.
Table 3: Most abundant minerals usually found in AOD slag.
Mineral name Structural formula
Ingesonite -Ca2SiO4
Larnite -Ca2SiO4
Merwinite Ca3MgSi2O8
Melilite (Ca,Na)2(Al,Mg,Fe)(Si,Al)2O7
Fluorite CaF2 2+ 3+ Spinel (Fe,Mg,Mn,Al,Cr) Me Me 2O4 Lime CaO Periclase MgO
1.2.4 Secondary metallurgical slag Secondary metallurgical slag is produced during the treatment of crude steel, and arises from the subsequent treatment of steel produced both in the BOF and EAF processes. Regardless of whether they originate in ore- or scrap-based steelmaking, secondary metallurgical slags often have a high content of CaO, SiO2, Al2O3 and MgO. The most common minerals found in the secondary metallurgical slag are listed in Table 4.
11 Table 4: Most abundant minerals usually found in secondary metallurgical slag.
Mineral name Structural formula
Ingesonite -Ca2SiO4
Larnite -Ca2SiO4
Bredegite Ca14Mg2(SiO4)8
Mayenite Ca12Al14O33
Tricalcium aluminate Ca3Al2O6
Cuspidine Ca4F2Si2O7 2+ 3+ Spinel (Fe,Mg,Mn,Al,Cr) Me Me 2O4 Lime CaO Periclase MgO
1.3 UTILIZATION OF STEELMAKING SLAGS An analysis of the focus areas in slag-related research in the periods 1996– 2000 and 2001–2004 indicates that slag recycling issues have gained importance in research, reflecting the increasing awareness of sustainable production and environmentally friendly processes [41,42], Within this research, the emphasis is primarily on finding and evaluating slag- containing products, such as:
• metallurgical fluxes • cement • aggregates for road and waterway construction • soil improvers and fertilizers
The usage of iron and steel slags in external applications such as road building and cement is nothing new. The earliest reports on the utilization of slags refer to Aristotle, who used slags as a medicament already around
12 350 BC [43]. During the following centuries, slag was mainly used as construction material. The Romans used slag in road construction about 2000 years ago. In 1813, the first road made of slag in modern times was built in England. However, slag has not only been used in road construction. In 1589, the Germans used slag from iron making when manufacturing cannonballs [44].
In Europe, the total slag production in 2006 reached approximately 45.5 million tonnes (blast furnace slag included). 80% of the slag produced was used in external applications such as road construction and manufacturing of cement, Figure 2.
Figure 2: Use of steel slags in Europe 2006: 45.5 million tonnes [1].
13 In Sweden today, by far the largest external application area for slag is within road construction. The physical and chemical properties of the steel slags often make them suitable for ballast in asphalt manufacturing. The highly basic steel slags easily react with the acid bitumen, forming a high- performance asphalt product. Tests performed by the Danish Road Directorate show an increase of 30% in durability when comparing normal mastic asphalt to asphalt made with EAF slag. The increase in porosity compared to ordinary stone material also helps to keep the road free of water, thereby reducing the risk for aquaplaning while at the same time lowering the noise generated by the rolling tires. Apart from road construction, steel slags may be suitable for applications such as reinforcement of riverbanks and in the manufacture of cement and fertilizer. As a fertilizer, converter lime combines many positive characteristics. Thanks to its mineral composition, it promotes plant growth. The immune system of the plants is especially strengthened by the high concentration of silica in the slag [45]. Apart from external recycling of steel slags, internal recycling is also applied. Tata Steel [46], Sidera [47] and Ferriere Nord [48] recycle their ladle slag back into the process as slag former. Apart from use as slag formers, ladle slag can also substitute some of the cement needed when manufacturing briquettes, which contributes to the reduction of CO2 emissions.
14 1.4 CRYSTALLIZATION THEORY As a new phase is formed in a system, the reaction is always associated with the Gibbs free energy of the system. When comparing Gibbs free energy of two mineral arrangements to determine which is the more stable, it is necessary to have a common basis for comparison. The widely adopted convention in chemistry is to compare Gibbs free energy levels based on the free energy of formation from the elements, Gf. The free energy of formation is the energy difference between the elements in their standard state and the elements chemically bonded to form a mineral at a certain temperature and/or pressure. The stability of a mineralogical arrangement may be expressed in terms of Gibbs free energy according to reaction (1).
= − G mineralogical reaction G f(products) G f(reactants) (1)
If, at a specific temperature – pressure condition, G reaction < 0, the product is more stable and the reaction may occur spontaneously. If G reaction > 0, then the reactants are more stable. The equilibrium condition is obtained if